- We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

# Staircase tableaux, the asymmetric exclusion process, and Askey-Wilson polynomials

^{a}Laboratoire d’Informatique Algorithmique: Fondements et Applications, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Université Paris Diderot–Paris 7, Case 7014, 75205, Paris Cedex 13, France; and

^{b}Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

^{1}To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ude.yelekreb.htam@smailliw.

## Abstract

We introduce some combinatorial objects called staircase tableaux, which have cardinality 4^{n}*n* !, and connect them to both the asymmetric exclusion process (ASEP) and Askey-Wilson polynomials. The ASEP is a model from statistical mechanics introduced in the late 1960s, which describes a system of interacting particles hopping left and right on a one-dimensional lattice of *n* sites with open boundaries. It has been cited as a model for traffic flow and translation in protein synthesis. In its most general form, particles may enter and exit at the left with probabilities α and γ, and they may exit and enter at the right with probabilities β and δ. In the bulk, the probability of hopping left is *q* times the probability of hopping right. Our first result is a formula for the stationary distribution of the ASEP with all parameters general, in terms of staircase tableaux. Our second result is a formula for the moments of (the weight function of) Askey-Wilson polynomials, also in terms of staircase tableaux. Since the 1980s there has been a great deal of work giving combinatorial formulas for moments of classical orthogonal polynomials (e.g. Hermite, Charlier, Laguerre); among these polynomials, the Askey-Wilson polynomials are the most important, because they are at the top of the hierarchy of classical orthogonal polynomials.

**Keywords:**Markov chain, matrix ansatz, permutation, orthogonal polynomial, traffic flow

The asymmetric exclusion process (ASEP) is an important model from statistical mechanics which was introduced independently in the context of biology (1) and in mathematics (2) around 1970. Since then the ASEP and its variants have been intensely studied, for various reasons: although the definition is quite simple, the ASEP is surprisingly rich. For example, it exhibits boundary-induced phase transitions, spontaneous symmetry breaking, and phase separation. Furthermore, the ASEP is a model for translation in protein synthesis (1) and traffic flow (3); it also appears in a kind of sequence alignment problem in computational biology (4). More recently it has been noticed that the ASEP has remarkable connections to orthogonal polynomials (5, 6), and to combinatorial phenomena (7–11).

The ASEP (sometimes also called the PASEP, for partially asymmetric exclusion process) describes a system of particles hopping left and right on a one-dimensional lattice of *n* sites. Particles enter the system from the left at rate *αdt* and exit the system from the right at rate *βdt*. In the most general form of the model, particles also enter from the right at rate *δdt* and exit to the left at rate *γdt*. The probability of hopping left and right is *qdt* and *udt*, respectively. Actually there is no loss of generality in setting *u* = 1, so we will often make this assumption.

Our first result is a combinatorial formula for the stationary distribution of the ASEP, with all parameters general. Our formula is in terms of some unique staircase tableaux, which generalize permutation tableaux (12, 13) and alternative tableaux (14). This generalizes our previous results (10, 11) for the ASEP when *γ* = *δ* = 0 and is a combinatorial formula for the stationary distribution of the ASEP with all parameters general.

Our second result is a combinatorial formula for the moments of (the weight function of) Askey-Wilson polynomials, also in terms of staircase tableaux. The Askey-Wilson polynomials are a family of *q*-orthogonal polynomials with parameters *a*, *b*, *c*, *d*, and *q* (14). They reside at the top of the hierarchy of the one-variable *q*-orthogonal polynomial family in the Askey scheme. In the early 1980s, following groundbreaking work of Flajolet (15), Viennot (16) initiated a combinatorial approach to orthogonal polynomials. Since then, combinatorial formulas have been given for the moments of (the weight functions of) many of the polynomials in the Askey scheme, including *q*-Hermite, Tchebycheff, *q*-Laguerre, Charlier, and Al-Salam-Chihara polynomials, see e.g. refs. 17–20). However, until now, no such formula was known for the moments of the Askey-Wilson polynomials.

Staircase tableaux seem to have a great deal of combinatorial interest, as well as a potential connection to geometry. For example, staircase tableaux of size *n* have cardinality 4^{n}*n* !, and hence are in bijection with doubly signed permutations. In a subsequent paper we will present an explicit bijection, as well as connections to other combinatorial objects. Furthermore, because of the connection to the ASEP, we know that our staircase tableaux have some hidden symmetries which are not at all apparent from their definition. For instance, it is clear from the definition of the ASEP that the model remains unchanged if we reflect it over the *y*-axis, and exchange parameters α and δ, β and γ, and *q* and *u*. However, the corresponding bijection on the level of tableaux has so far eluded us. Finally, staircase tableaux generalize permutation tableaux, which index certain cells in the nonnegative part of the Grassmannian (13); it would be interesting to better understand the relationship between the tableaux, the ASEP, and the geometry, and potentially generalize it to staircase tableaux.

Here we provide an outline of the proofs. However, details will appear elsewhere.

## Discussion

### The Asymmetric Exclusion Process (ASEP).

The ASEP is often defined using a continuous time parameter (22). However, one can equivalently define it as a discrete-time Markov chain (7), as follows.

Let α, β, γ, δ, *q*, and *u* be constants such that 0 ≤ *α* ≤ 1, 0 ≤ *β* ≤ 1, 0 ≤ *γ* ≤ 1, 0 ≤ *δ* ≤ 1, 0 ≤ *q* ≤ 1, and 0 ≤ *u* ≤ 1. The ASEP is the Markov chain on the 2^{n} words in the language {,•}^{}, with transition probabilities:

- If
*X*=*A*•*B*and*Y*=*A*•*B*then (particle hops right) and (particle hops left). - If
*X*=*B*and*Y*= •*B*then . - If
*X*=*B*• and*Y*=*B*then . - If
*X*= •*B*and*Y*=*B*then . - If
*X*=*B*and*Y*=*B*• then . - Otherwise
*P*_{X,Y}= 0 for*Y*≠*X*and .

Note that we will sometimes denote a state of the ASEP as a word in {0,1}^{n} and sometimes as a word in {,•}^{n}. In the latter notation, the symbol denotes the absence of a particle, which one can also think of as a white particle.

See Fig. 1 for an illustration of the four states, with transition probabilities, for the case *n* = 2. The probabilities on the loops are determined by the fact that the sum of the probabilities on all outgoing arrows from a given state is 1.

In the long time limit, the system reaches a steady state where all the probabilities *P*_{n}(*τ*_{1},*τ*_{2},…,*τ*_{n}) of finding the system in configurations (*τ*_{1},*τ*_{2},…,*τ*_{n}) are stationary, i.e. satisfy

Moreover, the stationary distribution is unique, as shown by Derrida, Evans, Hakim, and Pasquier (21).

When the parameters are all positive, it is clear that the ASEP has multiple symmetries, including the following.

- The “left-right” symmetry: if we reflect the ASEP over the
*y*axis, we get back the same model, except that the parameters α and δ, γ and β, and*u*and*q*are switched. - The “arrow-reversal” symmetry: if we exchange black and white particles, we get back the same model, except that the parameters α and γ, β and δ, and
*u*and*q*are switched. - The “particle-hole” symmetry: if we compose the above two symmetries, i.e. reflect the ASEP over the
*y*axis and exchange black and white particles, we get back the same model, except that α and β, and γ and δ are switched.

These symmetries imply results about the stationary distribution.

#### Observation 1.

*The steady state probabilities satisfy the following identities*:

*P*_{n}(*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) =*P*_{n}(*τ*_{n},…,*τ*_{1})|_{α↔δ,β↔γ,u↔q},*P*_{n}(*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) =*P*_{n}(1 -*τ*_{1},…,1 -*τ*_{n})|_{α↔γ,β↔δ,u↔q},*P*_{n}(*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) =*P*_{n}(1 -*τ*_{n},…,1 -*τ*_{1})|_{α↔β,γ↔δ}.

Above, the notation |_{α↔δ} indicates that the parameters α and δ are exchanged.

### Staircase Tableaux and the ASEP

The main combinatorial objects of this paper are some new tableaux which we call *staircase tableaux*. These tableaux generalize permutation tableaux (12, 13) and also Viennot’s alternative tableaux.

A staircase tableau of size *n* is a Young diagram of “staircase” shape (*n*,*n* - 1,…,2,1) such that boxes are either empty or labeled with α, β, γ, or δ, subject to the following conditions:

- no box along the diagonal is empty;
- all boxes in the same row and to the left of a β or a δ are empty;
- all boxes in the same column and above an α or a γ are empty.

The *type* of a staircase tableau is a word in {,•}^{n} obtained by reading the diagonal boxes from northeast to southwest and writing a • for each α or δ, and a for each β or γ.

See Fig. 2 for an example.

The *weight* of a staircase tableau is a monomial in α, β, γ, δ, *q*, and *u*, which we obtain as follows. Every blank box of is assigned a *q* or *u*, based on the label of the closest labeled box to its right in the same row and the label of the closest labeled box below it in the same column, such that

- every blank box which sees a β to its right gets a
*u*; - every blank box which sees a δ to its right gets a
*q*; - every blank box which sees an α or γ to its right, and an α or δ below it, gets a
*u*; - every blank box which sees an α or γ to its right, and a β or γ below it, gets a
*q*.

After filling all blank boxes, we define the *weight* of to be the product of all labels in all boxes.

Fig. 3 shows that the staircase tableau of Fig. 2 has weight *α*^{3}*β*^{2}*γ*^{3}*δ*^{3}*q*^{9}*u*^{8}.

The weight of a staircase tableau always has degree *n*(*n* + 1)/2. For convenience, we will sometimes set *u* = 1, since this results in no loss of information.

Our first main result is the following.

Consider any state τ of the ASEP with *n* sites, where the parameters α, β, γ, δ, *q* and *u* are general. Set , where the sum is over all staircase tableaux of size *n*. Then *Z*_{n} is the partition function for the ASEP, and the steady state probability that the ASEP is at state τ is precisely

where the sum is over all staircase tableaux of type τ.

Fig. 4 illustrates Theorem 2 for the state •• of the ASEP. All staircase tableaux of type •• are shown. It follows that the steady state probability of •• is

### A Moment Formula for Askey-Wilson Polynomials.

The Askey-Wilson polynomial is a *q*-orthogonal polynomial with four free parameters besides *q*. It resides at the top of the hierarchy of the one-variable *q*-orthogonal polynomial family in the Askey scheme (14, 22).

The *q*-shifted factorial is defined by

and the basic hypergeometric function is defined by

The Askey-Wilson polynomial *P*_{n}(*x*) = *P*_{n}(*x*; *a*,*b*,*c*,*d*|*q*) is explicitly defined to be

with *x* = cos *θ* for .

For |*a*|, |*b*|, |*c*|, |*d*| < 1, using *z* = *e*^{iθ}, the orthogonality is expressed by

where the integral contour *C* is a closed path which encloses the poles at *z* = *aq*^{k}, *bq*^{k}, *cq*^{k}, *dq*^{k} () and excludes the poles at *z* = (*aq*^{k})^{-1}, (*bq*^{k})^{-1}, (*cq*^{k})^{-1}, (*dq*^{k})^{-1} (), and where

(In the other parameter region, the orthogonality is continued analytically.)

The moments of the weight function of the Askey-Wilson polynomials (which are commonly referred to as simply the moments of the Askey-Wilson polynomials) are defined by

The second main result of this paper is a combinatorial formula for the moments of the Askey-Wilson polynomials. In Theorem 3 below, we use the substitution

Recall that , where the sum is over all staircase tableaux of size .

The *k*th moment of the Askey-Wilson polynomials is given by

We will prove Theorem 3 in a separate publication, by combining Theorem 2 with the results of ref. 6.

### A More Flexible Matrix Ansatz.

One of the most powerful techniques for studying the ASEP is the so-called *matrix ansatz*, an ansatz given by Derrida, Evans, Hakim, and Pasquier (21) as a tool for solving the steady state probabilities *P*_{n}(*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) of the ASEP. In this section we recall their matrix ansatz, then give a slight generalization which is a primary tool for proving Theorem 2.

For convenience, we set *u* = 1. Also, we define unnormalized weights *f*_{n}(*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}), which are equal to the *P*_{n}(*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) up to a constant:

where *Z*_{n} is the *partition function* . The sum defining *Z*_{n} is over all possible configurations *τ*{0,1}^{n}. Derrida *et al* showed the following (21).

Suppose that *D* and *E* are matrices, *V* is a column vector, and *W* is a row vector, such that the following conditions hold:

Then for any state *τ* = (*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) of the ASEP,

Note that is simply a product of *n* matrices *D* or *E* with matrix *D* at position *i* if site *i* is occupied (*τ*_{i} = 1). Also note that Theorem 4 implies that *Z*_{n} = *W*(*D* + *E*)^{n}*V*.

We now give a more flexible version of Theorem 4.

Let {*λ*_{n}}_{n≥0} be a family of constants. Suppose that *W* and *V* are row and column vectors, and *D* and *E* are matrices such that for any words *X* and *Y* in *D* and *E*, we have

*WX*(*DE*-*qED*)*YV*=*λ*_{|X|+|Y|+2}*WX*(*D*+*E*)*YV*;*βWXDV*-*δWXEV*=*λ*_{|X|+1}*WXV*;*αWEYV*-*γWDYV*=*λ*_{|Y|+1}*WYV*.

(Here |*X*| is the length of *X*). Then for any state *τ* = (*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) of the ASEP,

In the next section we will explain how to use Theorem 5 to prove Theorem 2.

### A Sketch of the Proof of Theorem 2.

Our method for proving Theorem 2 is to define vectors *W*, *V* and matrices *D*, *E*; prove that they have the requisite combinatorial interpretation in terms of staircase tableaux; and check that they satisfy the relations of Theorem 5, with *λ*_{0} = 1 and *λ*_{n} = *αβ* - *γδq*^{n-1} for *n*≥1.

We define “row” and “column” vectors *W* = (*W*_{ik})_{i,k} and *V* = (*V*_{j})_{j,}, and matrices *D* = (*D*_{i,j,k,})_{i,j,k,} and *E* = (*E*_{i,j,k,})_{i,j,k,} (where *i*, *j*, *k*, range over the nonnegative integers) by the following:

We say that a row of a staircase tableau is *indexed by* β if the leftmost box in that row which is not occupied by a *q* or *u* is a β. Note that every box to the left of that β must be a *u*. Similarly we will talk about rows which are *indexed by* δ; in this case, every box to the left of that δ must be a *q*. We will also talk about row *α*/*γ*, which is shorthand for rows which are indexed by α or γ.

It is not too hard to give a combinatorial interpretation to products of our matrices and vectors. In what follows, if *X* is a word in *D*’s and *E*’s, we say that its *type* is the corresponding word in •’s and ’s.

If *X* is a word in *D*’s and *E*’s, then

- , where the sum is over all staircase tableaux of type
*X*which have*j*rows indexed by δ and rows indexed by*α*/*γ*(and hence |*X*| -*j*- rows indexed by β); - , where the sum is over all staircase tableaux of type
*X*.

We want to show that our matrices and vectors *D*, *E*, *W*, *V* satisfy the relations of Theorem 5. It is easy to give a combinatorial proof that they satisfy relation (**3**) of Theorem 5; however, we have not found a combinatorial proof that they satisfy relations (**1**) or (**2**). Instead, our strategy is to give an algebraic proof that they satisfy the following two identities, which suffices to show that they satisfy relations (**1**) and (**2**) of Theorem 5.

For all nonnegative integers *j* and we have

- (
*WXDE*)_{j}=*q*(*WXED*)_{j}+*αβ*(*WX*(*D*+*E*))_{j}-*γδq*^{|X|+1}(*WX*(*D*+*E*))_{j-1,}. *β*(*WXD*)_{j}=*δ*(*WXE*)_{j-1,}+*αβ*(*WX*)_{j,-1}-*γδq*^{|X|}(*WX*)_{j-1,-1}.

### Open Problems.

This work suggests a variety of open problems, which we briefly mention below.

#### Specializing the Askey-Wilson moment formula.

Show directly that the moment formula of Theorem 3 recovers already-known moment formulas for specializations or limiting cases of Askey-Wilson polynomials.

#### A combinatorial proof of the relations of the matrix ansatz.

Give a combinatorial proof that the matrices *D*, *E* and vectors *V*, *W* we defined in the previous section satisfy relations (**1**) and (**2**) of Theorem 5.2.

When *q* = *t*, or one of α, β, γ, δ is 0, this problem is easy.

#### Symmetries in the ASEP.

As mentioned in the Introduction, the ASEP has a “left-right symmetry.” (It also has an “arrow-reversal symmetry” and a “particle-hole symmetry,” which is the composition of the other two.)

Find an involution on staircase tableaux which corresponds to the “left-right symmetry” in the ASEP.

#### Lifting the ASEP to a Markov chain on staircase tableaux.

Find a Markov chain on the set of all staircase tableaux of size *n* which projects to the ASEP in the sense of ref. 11, such that the steady state probability of a tableau is proportional to wt(*T*). Such an approach would give a completely combinatorial proof of Theorem 2. (This was done in ref. 11 for *γ* = *δ* = 0.)

#### Keeping track of where the particles come from.

In the ASEP, a black particle enters from either the left (at rate α) or from the right (at rate δ). Similarly, a “hole” (or a white particle) enters from either the left (at rate γ) or from the right (at rate β). We might therefore hope to define a more refined Markov chain on 4^{n} states, which “projects” to the ASEP and keeps track of where the black and white particles came from. Indeed, the staircase tableaux themselves seem to be keeping track of more information than just the color of the particles.

Fix a lattice of *n* sites, and define a Markov chain on 4^{n} states (words of length *n* on the alphabet {*α*,*β*,*γ*,*δ*}) with the following properties:

- particles labeled α and γ always enter from the left, and particles labeled β and δ always enter from the right;
- the Markov chain projects to the ASEP in the sense of ref. 11;
- the steady state probability of state (
*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}) is proportional to the generating function for all staircase tableaux whose border is (*τ*_{1},…,*τ*_{n}).

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.

We are grateful to I. Gessel, M. Josuat-Vergès, and R. Stanley for interesting remarks. S.C. and L.K.W. were partially supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche Grants blan07-2 195422 and 08-JCJC-0011, and L.K.W. was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant DMS-0854432 and an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship.

## Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

## References

*q*-Laguerre polynomials. 2009. arXiv:0810.3232.

**National Academy of Sciences**

## Formats:

- Article |
- PubReader |
- ePub (beta) |
- PDF (220K)

- Role of the particle's stepping cycle in an asymmetric exclusion process: a model of mRNA translation.[Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 20...]
*Ciandrini L, Stansfield I, Romano MC.**Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 May; 81(5 Pt 1):051904. Epub 2010 May 5.* - Asymmetric exclusion process with next-nearest-neighbor interaction: some comments on traffic flow and a nonequilibrium reentrance transition[Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat I...]
*Antal T, Schutz GM.**Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 2000 Jul; 62(1 Pt A):83-93.* - Dynamic boundaries in asymmetric exclusion processes.[Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 20...]
*Nowak SA, Fok PW, Chou T.**Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):031135. Epub 2007 Sep 27.* - Totally asymmetric exclusion process with extended objects: a model for protein synthesis.[Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 20...]
*Shaw LB, Zia RK, Lee KH.**Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Aug; 68(2 Pt 1):021910. Epub 2003 Aug 18.* - Application of adjoint Monte Carlo to accelerate simulations of mono-directional beams in treatment planning for boron neutron capture therapy.[Med Phys. 2007]
*Nievaart VA, Légràdy D, Moss RL, Kloosterman JL, van der Hagen TH, van Dam H.**Med Phys. 2007 Apr; 34(4):1321-35.*

- PubMedPubMedPubMed citations for these articles

- Staircase tableaux, the asymmetric exclusion process, and Askey-Wilson polynomia...Staircase tableaux, the asymmetric exclusion process, and Askey-Wilson polynomialsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Apr 13, 2010; 107(15)6726PMC

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

See more...