• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of epidinfectJournal HomepageSubscribeSumbitJournal Homepage
Epidemiol Infect. Aug 2007; 135(6): 1014–1020.
Published online Jan 12, 2007. doi:  10.1017/S0950268806007801
PMCID: PMC2870657

Optimizing typhoid fever case definitions by combining serological tests in a large population study in Hechi City, China

SUMMARY

Blood culture-based diagnosis can only detect a fraction of the total burden of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi. The objective of the study was to detect additional typhoid fever cases through serological tests. A total of 1732 prolonged fever episodes were evaluated using three serological tests, Widal, Tubex® and Typhidot-M® in a typhoid fever endemic area of southern China. A case definition which included a positive Widal test (TO[gt-or-equal, slanted]80 & TH>A), a positive Tubex® test ([gt-or-equal, slanted]4) and a positive Typhidot-M® test, increased the detection of cases by more than twofold from 13 to 28 cases. The case definition has a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 39%. Case definitions based on combinations of serological tests can detect additional typhoid fever cases with higher specificity than a single serological test. Improved case detection is essential to understand the true disease burden and can help to boost the power of intervention trials.

INTRODUCTION

The isolation of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of typhoid fever [1]. However the isolation rate of S. Typhi from blood cultures of typhoid fever patients is relatively low. Culturing bone marrow aspirates has a much higher sensitivity, but for large population-based studies it is neither appropriate nor feasible to perform on all fever cases. Large studies have to rely on blood cultures which have a sensitivity between 30% and 70% [2, 3]. Reasons for reduced S. Typhi detection rates in blood cultures include pre-medication with antibiotics and low bacterial load in the peripheral circulation. The latter point can be partially overcome by incubation of relatively large amounts of blood (10 ml).

Evidence for the relatively low sensitivity of blood cultures in the detection of typhoid fever comes from vaccine probe studies. A Vi polysaccharide (Vi PS) vaccine trial carried out in Guangxi China in 1995 showed similar protection whether cases where detected by blood culture or Widal serology (69% and 68% respectively) [4]. However Widal serology tests (Lanzhou Institute, China) detected 2·6-fold (sum of blood-culture positives and serology positives) more cases than detection based on blood culture alone.

More recently two antibody-based rapid tests, IDL-Tubex® (IDL Biotech AB, Borlange, Sweden) and Typhidot-M® (Malaysian Bio-Diagnostics Research Sdn. Bhd., Selangor, Malaysia), have become available for the detection of typhoid fever in clinical settings [58]. We evaluated the use of serological tests to generate a case definition that can identify S. Typhi blood-culture-negative individuals with 100% specificity in Hechi City in preparation of a large Vi PS vaccine trial which may rely on serology in addition to culture for case detection [9]. Such a definition, if valid, could be of great benefit when assessing burden of disease or when evaluating public health interventions including vaccines.

METHODS

Study site

The study took place in a typhoid endemic area of southern China, Hechi Prefecture of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Guangxi Province). The study site included the two most populous areas in the prefecture Jin Cheng Jiang, an urban area, and Don Jiang, a rural area. Typhoid fever cases were detected through passive surveillance in preparation for a trial with the Vi PS vaccine. All 85 health facilities in the catchment area; five hospitals, two township health centres, 10 factory clinics and 68 private clinics, participated in the surveillance. Patients aged between 5 and 60 years who reported a history of fever for [gt-or-equal, slanted]3 days were eligible to participate in the study. If the patient or a parent/guardian consented a 10 ml blood sample was obtained, of which 8 ml were inoculated in blood culture bottles and sera from the remaining 2 ml blood were used for serology.

Laboratory methods

Blood samples were inoculated immediately after collection into BACTEC® Plus blood culture bottles (Becton, Dickinson & Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and cultures were performed by customary methods [10]. All isolates were confirmed at the Oxford University–Wellcome Trust Research Unit in Ho Chi Min City, Vietnam. Three serological tests, Widal, IDL-Tubex® and Typhidot-M®, were used to detect immune responses to S. Typhi.

Widal

The Widal test was performed with standardized S. Typhi O (TO) and S. Typhi H (TH) antigens and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi A (S. Paratyphi A) O and H antigens (A) [6, 11, 12]. Serial tube dilutions were prepared in normal saline and 500 μl of each TO, TH, and A antigens were added to 500 μl of each antiserum dilution. The solutions were incubated at 37°C overnight and checked visually for agglutination. The titre was determined as the highest dilution that showed visible agglutination. The dilutions used were 1:80, 1:160, 1:320 and 1:640.

Typhidot-M®

The Typhidot-M® is a dot enzyme immunosorbent assay that identifies serum immunoglobulin (Ig)M against a 50 kDa outer membrane protein (OMP) from S. Typhi. In total, 15 μl of serum are incubated with 15 μl of IgG inactivation reagent [5, 7]. The IgG-inactivated serum is incubated with the strips at a final dilution of 1:100. The strips are incubated with the serum for 1 h followed by three washes, and then incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-human IgM for 1 h followed by another three washes. The strips are incubated with the colour reagent and the intensity of the two dots is compared with the intensity of the corresponding dots produced on the positive control strip. The results are qualitative, either negative or positive.

Tubex®

The IDL-Tubex® test is a semi-quantitative competitive agglutination test designed to detect the presence of antibodies directed against S. Typhi O9 antigens [68]. A total of 45 μl of S. Typhi LPS-coated magnetic beads are mixed with 45 μl of serum, then 90 μl of a solution containing monoclonal anti-O9 antibodies, as competitive antibodies, are added. The solution is placed on a magnet. The intensity of the resulting colour is used to assign a score (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10) according to the colour scale provided by the manufacturer.

Analysis

We combined serological tests with the aim of developing a definition of a typhoid fever case with 100% specificity and the highest sensitivity. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of patients from whose blood S. Typhi was isolated and whose serological tests were positive for S. Typhi. Specificity was defined as the proportion of patients from whom S. Paratyphi A was isolated and whose serological tests were negative for S. Typhi. Among the definitions with the highest specificity, the definition with the highest sensitivity was selected. This approach was applied to Widal and IDL-Tubex® tests which are semi-quantitative tests, for which different cut-offs could be used to calculate the specificity and sensitivity. In contrast, Typhidot-M® is a qualitative test and the results are either positive or negative. The three serological tests were combined utilizing the Boolean operator ‘and’. The analysis was performed using stata version 7.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Ethical considerations

Ethical considerations and required approvals were obtained for the study following the principles that govern biomedical research involving human subjects. The local ethics committee, the WHO Secretariat Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, and the International Vaccine Institute (IVI) Institutional Review Board approved the protocol.

RESULTS

From August 2001 to March 2003, a total of 1874 episodes with [gt-or-equal, slanted]3 days of fever were detected in 1861 residents aged 5–60 years attending the Hechi health facilities. All three serological tests, Widal, IDL-Tubex® and Typhidot-M® were performed on specimens collected from 1732 febrile episodes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
Assembling a study population for the case definition.

The highest specificity for the Widal test, 95%, was reached by 7 of 12 case definitions (Table 1). Of which the definition ‘TO[gt-or-equal, slanted]80 & TH>A’ had the highest sensitivity 62%. A Tubex score of [gt-or-equal, slanted]4 was chosen as the definition of a positive according to the manufacturer's recommendations, which had 95% specificity and 69% sensitivity. The Typhidot-M® test had specificity and sensitivity of 91% and 54% respectively.

Table 1
Sensitivity and specificity of 1732 serological tests

Combining the three individual case definitions increased the number of putative typhoid cases by more than twofold from 13 to 28 cases (Table 2, Fig. 2). The sensitivity of the case definition was 39% while the specificity remained at 100%.

Fig. 2
Sensitivity, specificity and yield of the selected case definition, in all episodes (n=1732) (TH[gt-or-equal, slanted]80 & TH>A, Tx[gt-or-equal, slanted]4, Td=positive). Wi, Widal test; Tx, Tubex®; Td, Typhidot-M®. A greater than twofold increase ...
Table 2
Proposed definition of (Widal, Tubex® and Typhidot-M®) with different cut-off values in 1732 fever episodes

DISCUSSION

A typhoid fever case definition, prolonged fever ([gt-or-equal, slanted]3 days of fever) plus a combination of positive serological tests resulted in a twofold increase in case detection retaining 100% specificity. The twofold increase in typhoid fever case detection using three serological tests is within the expected range considering the sensitivity of the blood culture compared to the bone marrow (30–70%). A case definition with specificity close to 100% minimizes misclassification which is paramount in a vaccine trial. A key aspect of our study is to base the specificity on a true S. Typhi culture-negative group, for which we chose the S. Paratyphi A-positive group. Paratyphoid fever has a clinical course indistinguishable to that of typhoid fever. The underlying assumption is that dual infections with S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi are exceedingly rare and the risk that controls are misclassified false positives is therefore much reduced. Although S. Paratyphi A is closely related to S. Typhi, all three serological tests are specific to Typhi antigens (O and H antigens for Widal, O9 antigen for Tubex®, and a S. Typhi-specific OMP for Typhidot-M®), hence the S. Paratyphi A culture-positive group can be used as the comparison group. Additionally, the cut-off values used in the Widal test included the criterion TH>AH, which could mean that the current infection is probably due to S. Typhi rather than S. Paratyphi A.

Nevertheless serology-based detection of typhoid fever cases has to be interpreted with caution. The background levels of agglutinins and antibodies detectable in populations without acute typhoid fever can vary depending on the degree of typhoid fever endemicity [1118]. Although it was not the case with our study (results not shown), there are reports that the prevalence of antibodies increases with age [12, 19]. Moreover, the level of antibodies can change in areas where typhoid vaccines are widely in use. False positives can be caused by non-typhoid Salmonella; other bacterial species [20], and with other conditions such as malaria, immunological disorders and chronic liver diseases [21]. Furthermore, culture-positive typhoid fever patients may not produce detectable antibody levels resulting in a false-negative serology [14, 16, 18, 22, 23]. Our findings are based on the acute phase of the febrile illness in which antibody responses may not yet be detectable; hence we may still be underestimating the true number of cases. All these factors can decrease specificity and sensitivity of serological tests in regions where typhoid fever is endemic. Finally, our conclusions are based on relatively small numbers of cases and evaluation in other datasets is required, although typhoid fever phase-III clinical trials are generally powered by small numbers of cases. To achieve a more complete understanding of the antibody responses and serological tests for typhoid fever we are currently comparing and contrasting findings from four additional Asian countries.

The newer serological tests did not offer substantial advantages over the established Widal test. Only the shorter time to generate a result may be of an importance to clinicians. Dutta and co-workers have estimated that 18 h are required for the Widal tube agglutination test, 3 h for Typhidot-M®, and 10 min for the Tubex® test [24]. Recently it has been reported that the nested PCR-based diagnosis of typhoid could be a more useful tool than either blood culture or Widal test owing to its greater discriminatory ability [2527]. It might possibly be of great use in vaccine trials assuming the availability of sophisticated equipment and specialized skills of the laboratory workers.

In summary, case definitions based on combinations of serological tests can detect additional cases while maintaining 100% specificity. These tests were relatively easy to perform and feasible in a small laboratory setting in China. Serology-based case definitions can provide a more accurate picture of the true typhoid fever burden and boost the power of intervention trials.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Yang Honghui, Tang Dongmei, M. John Albert, John Wain, Amanda Walsh, Jeremy Farrar, Yanning Gao, Michael Goon, Eun Young Kim, Sue Kyoung Jo, and the staff of the Guangxi Center for Prevention and Disease Control (CDC), China. This work was supported by the Diseases of the Most Impoverished Program, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. International Vaccine Institute (IVI) is supported by the governments of the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Kuwait.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

1. Bhutta ZA, Mansurali N. Rapid serologic diagnosis of pediatric typhoid fever in an endemic area: a prospective comparative evaluation of two dot-enzyme immunoassays and the Widal test. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1999;61:654–657. [PubMed]
2. Bopp CA, Murray PR. Escherichia, Shigella and Salmonella. 8th edn Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2003. Manual of clinical microbiology; pp. 654–671. , pp.
3. Cherian T. et al. Prevalence of Salmonella typhi O and H antibodies in the serum of infants and preschool children. Indian Pediatrics. 1990;27:293–294. [PubMed]
4. Chongsa-nguan M. et al. Current status of widal test in diagnosis of typhoid fever in an endemic area. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 1989;20:493–495. [PubMed]
5. Clegg A. et al. Re-evaluation of the Widal agglutination test in response to the changing pattern of typhoid fever in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Acta Tropica. 1994;57:255–263. [PubMed]
6. Coovadia YM. et al. Comparison of passive haemagglutination test with Widal agglutination test for serological diagnosis of typhoid fever in an endemic area. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1986;39:680–683. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Espersen F. et al. Quantitative immunoelectrophoretic analysis of Salmonella typhi antigens and of corresponding antibodies in human sera. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica (B) 1980;88:237–242. [PubMed]
8. Farooqui BJ. et al. Comparative yield of Salmonella typhi from blood and bone marrow cultures in patients with fever of unknown origin. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1991;44:258–259. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Hoffman SL. et al. Duodenal string-capsule culture compared with bone-marrow, blood, and rectal-swab cultures for diagnosing typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1984;149:157–161. [PubMed]
10. House D. et al. Serology of typhoid fever in an area of endemicity and its relevance to diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2001;39:1002–1007. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Levine MM. et al. Diagnostic value of the Widal test in areas endemic for typhoid fever. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1978;27:795–800. [PubMed]
12. Olsen SJ. et al. Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for typhoid fever. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2004;42:1885–1889. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Oracz G. et al. Rapid diagnosis of acute Salmonella gastrointestinal infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2003;36:112–115. [PubMed]
14. Pang T, Pothocheary SD. False-positive widal test in nontyphoid Salmonella infections. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 1989;20:163–164. [PubMed]
15. Parry CM. et al. Value of a single-tube widal test in diagnosis of typhoid fever in Vietnam. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1999;37:2882–2886. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Prokopec J. et al. Typhoid fever survey in two localities in Vietnam. Journal of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Microbiology, and Immunology. 1991;35:9–16. [PubMed]
17. Saha SK. et al. Interpretation of the Widal test in the diagnosis of typhoid fever in Bangladeshi children. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics. 1996;16:75–78. [PubMed]
18. Schroeder SA. Interpretation of serologic tests for typhoid fever. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1968;206:839–840. [PubMed]
19. Senewiratne B, Senewiratne K. Reassessment of the Widal test in the diagnosis of typhoid. Gastroenterology. 1977;73:233–236. [PubMed]
20. Somerville PC. et al. The Widal test in the diagnosis of typhoid fever in the transvaal. South African Medical Journal. 1981;59:851–854. [PubMed]
21. Vallenas C. et al. Efficacy of bone marrow, blood, stool and duodenal contents cultures for bacteriologic confirmation of typhoid fever in children. Pediatric Infectious Disease. 1985;4:496–498. [PubMed]
22. Yang J. et al. A mass vaccination campaign targeting adults and children to prevent typhoid fever in Hechi; expanding the use of Vi polysaccharide vaccine in southeast China: a cluster-randomized trial. BioMed Central Public Health. 2005;5:49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Yang HH. et al. Efficacy trial of Vi polysaccharide vaccine against typhoid fever in south-western China. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79:625–631. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Dutta SB. et al. Evaluation of new-generation serological tests for the diagnosis of typhoid fever: Data from a community-based surveillance in Calcutta, India. 2006. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. Published online: 25 August 2006 . doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.024
25. Prakash P. et al. Evaluation of nested PCR in diagnosis of typhoid fever. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005;43:431–432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Haque A, Ahmed J, Quereshi J. Early detection of typhoid by polymerase chain reaction. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 1999;19:337–340. [PubMed]
27. Massi MN. et al. Rapid diagnosis of typhoid fever by PCR assay using one pair of primers from flagellin gene of Salmonella typhi. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2003;9:233–237. [PubMed]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...