• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of molcancBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleMolecular CancerJournal Front Page
Mol Cancer. 2010; 9: 57.
Published online Mar 12, 2010. doi:  10.1186/1476-4598-9-57
PMCID: PMC2850884

Targeting mTORC2 inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation in vitro and tumor formation in vivo

Abstract

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which exists in two functionally distinct complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2 plays an important role in tumor growth. Whereas the role of mTORC1 has been well characterized in this process, little is known about the functions of mTORC2 in cancer progression. In this study, we explored the specific role of mTORC2 in colon cancer using a short hairpin RNA expression system to silence the mTORC2-associated protein rictor. We found that downregulation of rictor in HT29 and LS174T colon cancer cells significantly reduced cell proliferation. Knockdown of rictor also resulted in a G1 arrest as observed by cell cycle analysis. We further observed that LS174T cells deficient for rictor failed to form tumors in a nude mice xenograft model. Taken together, these results show that the inhibition of mTORC2 reduces colon cancer cell proliferation in vitro and tumor xenograft formation in vivo. They also suggest that specifically targeting mTORC2 may provide a novel treatment strategy for colorectal cancer.

Findings

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine-threonine kinase that regulates cell growth and proliferation in response to the availability of growth factors and nutrients [1,2]. mTOR exists in two functionally distinct complexes: mTORC1 and mTORC2, which have different functions and are differentially sensitive to rapamycin [3]. mTORC1 is composed of mTOR, mLST8, PRAS40, deptor and raptor and is sensitive to rapamycin. mTORC1 enhances cell growth and proliferation through various mechanisms including synthesis of proteins and lipids as well as reduction of autophagy. Part of the functions of mTORC1 are mediated by the phosphorylation and activation of S6K1 and 4E-BP1, two well characterized downstream effectors of mTORC1 [1]. mTORC2 contains mTOR, mLST8, mSIN1, deptor, protor-1 and rictor. Although mTORC2 is classically insensitive to rapamycin, prolonged exposure to rapamycin may also inhibit mTORC2 activity by blocking its assembly in certain cell types [4]. In contrast to mTORC1, relatively little is known about the functions of mTORC2. It has been described that mTORC2 regulates cell survival and cytoskeletal organization through the regulation of Akt and PKCα respectively [5,6].

Since mTOR plays a major role in cell growth and proliferation, targeting mTOR in cancer therapy has been viewed as a promising approach [3,7]. Indeed, alterations of mTOR signaling pathway are commonly observed in solid tumors. Whereas the role of mTORC1 in cancer progression has been extensively characterized, the role of mTORC2 is much less documented. So far it has been shown that targeting mTORC2 might be beneficial in tumors harboring high levels of activated Akt, such as gliomas or tumors caused by PTEN deletion [8,9]. Since the activation of Akt is frequently observed in colorectal cancer [10], we wish here to analyse the role of mTORC2 in colon cancer.

To investigate the role of mTORC2 in colon cancer, we used a lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression system that suppresses the expression of rictor to block the activity of mTORC2 [5]. In addition we also suppressed the expression of raptor to block mTORC1 or the expression of mTOR to block both complexes. HT29 and LS174T colon cancer cells were infected with lentiviruses expressing either a scramble shRNA, raptor shRNA, rictor shRNA or mTOR shRNA. The gene knockdown efficiency following infection was analysed by Western Blot. Using this technique, we observed that raptor, rictor and mTOR expression was significantly reduced in both HT29 and LS174T cells (Figure (Figure1A).1A). We further observed that mTOR and raptor downregulation reduced the phosphorylation of S6K1, a downstream target of mTORC1. In addition, we also found that mTOR and rictor shRNA significantly reduced the phosphorylation of Akt, a downstream effector of mTORC2. Finally, targeting raptor increased the phosphorylation of Akt consistent with a previously reported negative feedback loop whereby inhibition of mTORC1 induces the activation of Akt (Figure (Figure1A)1A) [3]. These results show that mTORC1 and mTORC2 activity can be efficiently blocked by raptor or rictor shRNA respectively in HT29 and LS174T cells. To further document the role of mTOR in colon cancer cells, we also treated HT29 and LS174T cells with rapamycin, a chemical inhibitor of mTORC1. Similarly to the inhibition of mTORC1 by raptor shRNA, we found that, while blocking S6K1 phosphorylation, rapamycin increased Akt phosphorylation, These results show that rapamycin inhibits mTORC1 but not mTORC2 in HT29 and LS174T cells (Figure (Figure1B1B).

Figure 1
Downregulation of mTOR, rictor and raptor in HT29 and LS174T colon cancer cells. (A) Knockdown of raptor, rictor or mTOR in HT29 (HT) and LS174T (LS). HT29 and LS174T cells were infected with recombinant lentiviruses containing the indicated shRNA. Two ...

After selection by puromycin for 48 hours, we also found that knockdown of mTOR and rictor significantly changed the morphology of HT29 and LS174T cells. While HT29 and LS174T cells had a small distinct cytoplasm and grew in cell clusters, mTOR or rictor deficient HT29 and LS174T cells were small and round with absent cytoplasm, and which failed to grow (Figure (Figure2A).2A). In contrast, raptor knockdown did not alter the morphology of HT29 and LS174T cells. To exclude that the morphological changes observed in mTOR and rictor knockdown cells was indeed due to an increased cell death, we monitored apoptosis by quantifying DNA fragmentation. We did not find a significant change in cell apoptosis between cells expressing scramble, raptor, mTOR or rictor shRNA (Figure (Figure2B2B).

Figure 2
Morphological changes induced by mTORC2 knockdown in colon cancer cells. (A) Morphological effects of mTOR and Rictor downregulation in HT29 and LS174T cells. HT29 or LS174T cells were infected with lentiviruses expressing shRNAs targeting the indicated ...

To further characterize the role of mTORC2 in colon cancer progression, we analyzed the effect of rictor knockdown on colon cancer cell proliferation. We found that the proliferation of HT29 and LS174T cells deficient for rictor or mTOR was markedly reduced (Figure (Figure3A).3A). Knockdown of raptor also significantly reduced the proliferation of HT29 and LS174T cells compared to control cells, however to a lesser extend than rictor or mTOR knockdown. Finally, rapamycin treatment also reduced cell proliferation to a similar extend than raptor knockdown. To gain insight into the mechanism by which rictor and mTOR knockdown reduced colon cancer cell proliferation, we analyzed cell cycle progression using propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry analysis. We found that mTOR or rictor knockdown in LS174T cells resulted in a G1 arrest as observed by a marked increase in the G1 population. Similar results were observed in HT29 cells (Figure (Figure3B3B).

Figure 3
Effects of mTORC2 knockdown on HT29 and LS174T cell proliferation. (A) Knockdown of mTOR or rictor reduces the proliferation of HT29 and LS174T cells. HT29 and LS174T cells were infected with lentiviral particles containing scramble, raptor, rictor or ...

We next tested the effect of mTOR and rictor knockdown on tumor growth in vivo. LS174T cells deficient for mTOR, raptor and rictor as well as LS174T expressing a scramble shRNA as a control were injected subcutaneously into nude mice and tumor growth was monitored. We found that mTOR or rictor deficient LS174T cells failed to form a tumor xenograft even after 60 days of observations (Figure (Figure4).4). In contrast, LS174T cells deficient for raptor formed tumor xenografts which grew however slower than control xenografts.

Figure 4
Colon cancer cells require mTOR or rictor to form tumors as xenografts. LS174T cells were infected with lentiviral particles containing scramble, raptor, rictor or mTOR shRNA. Stable transfectants were selected for resistance to puromycin for 48 hours ...

Several studies have demonstrated that the activity of mTOR is increased in tumors [7]. Particularly in colorectal cancer, mTOR signaling components were highly activated in tumor specimen compared to non cancerous mucosa [11]. Furthermore, targeting mTOR with a specific siRNA to mTOR also reduced SW480 and HCT116 colon cancer cell proliferation and survival in vitro and injection of small interfering RNA to mTOR into HCT116 tumor xenografts also blocked tumor growth in vivo [11]. In addition, the inhibition of mTORC1 suppressed the formation of colonic adenomas and cancers in a mouse model of familial adenomatous polyposis [12]. Therefore, targeting mTOR in colorectal cancer might be a successful strategy. mTOR exists in two distinct complexes, however, no study so far has analyzed the specific role of mTORC2 in colorectal cancer development. Here, we found that mTORC2 plays an important role in colon cancer cell proliferation. Downregulation of mTORC2, by either blocking the expression of mTOR or rictor, reduced the proliferation of HT29 and LS174T colon cancer cells in vitro and inhibited the formation of tumor xenografts in vivo. We therefore propose that targeting mTORC2 in colon cancer could be a promising therapeutical strategy.

Targeting mTOR with rapamycin or its analogs in clinical studies has been less successful than expected [7]. However, as mTORC2 and part of mTORC1 functionality are resistant to rapamycin, one may speculate that therapies that target both complexes will be much more efficient in cancer therapy. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that the inhibition of mTORC1 reduced colon cancer cell proliferation, however to a lesser extend than the inhibition of both complexes, or mTORC2 alone. Recently, several groups have developed ATP-competitive and selective mTOR inhibitors that target simultaneously both complexes [13-15]. Initial experiments have shown that the antiproliferative efficacy of these inhibitors is superior to rapamycin [15]. Future studies will reveal the efficacy of such inhibitors in cancer therapy; one major concern being that these inhibitors might have considerable toxicity in vivo. However, our results suggest that targeting only mTORC2 might be sufficient to prevent colon cancer progression and thus give a rationale for the development of drugs that specifically target mTORC2.

Abbreviations

mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; shRNA: small hairpin RNA.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

DR, YC, ADM performed the experiments and interpreted the experimental findings. YC and OD conceived the study. DR drafted the manuscript. ND and OD wrote the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank David Sabatini for sharing plasmids. This work was supported by a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SCORE 32323B-123821 to OD).

References

  • Wullschleger S, Loewith R, Hall MN. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell. 2006;124:471–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1926–1945. doi: 10.1101/gad.1212704. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Guertin DA, Sabatini DM. Defining the role of mTOR in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.05.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Sengupta S, Sheen JH, Hsu PP, Bagley AF, Markhard AL, Sabatini DM. Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKB. Mol Cell. 2006;22:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.029. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sarbassov DD, Guertin DA, Ali SM, Sabatini DM. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science. 2005;307:1098–1101. doi: 10.1126/science.1106148. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jacinto E, Loewith R, Schmidt A, Lin S, Ruegg MA, Hall A, Hall MN. Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:1122–1128. doi: 10.1038/ncb1183. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Faivre S, Kroemer G, Raymond E. Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:671–688. doi: 10.1038/nrd2062. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Masri J, Bernath A, Martin J, Jo OD, Vartanian R, Funk A, Gera J. mTORC2 activity is elevated in gliomas and promotes growth and cell motility via overexpression of rictor. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11712–11720. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2223. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Guertin DA, Stevens DM, Saitoh M, Kinkel S, Crosby K, Sheen JH, Mullholland DJ, Magnuson MA, Wu H, Sabatini DM. mTOR complex 2 is required for the development of prostate cancer induced by Pten loss in mice. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:148–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.12.017. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rychahou PG, Kang J, Gulhati P, Doan HQ, Chen LA, Xiao SY, Chung DH, Evers BM. Akt2 overexpression plays a critical role in the establishment of colorectal cancer metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:20315–20320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810715105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang YJ, Dai Q, Sun DF, Xiong H, Tian XQ, Gao FH, Xu MH, Chen GQ, Han ZG, Fang JY. mTOR signaling pathway is a target for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2617–2628. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0555-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fujishita T, Aoki K, Lane HA, Aoki M, Taketo MM. Inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway suppresses intestinal polyp formation and reduces mortality in ApcDelta716 mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:13544–13549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800041105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Thoreen CC, Kang SA, Chang JW, Liu Q, Zhang J, Gao Y, Reichling LJ, Sim T, Sabatini DM, Gray NS. An ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor reveals rapamycin-resistant functions of mTORC1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:8023–8032. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900301200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Feldman ME, Apsel B, Uotila A, Loewith R, Knight ZA, Ruggero D, Shokat KM. Active-site inhibitors of mTOR target rapamycin-resistant outputs of mTORC1 and mTORC2. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e38. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000038. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yu K, Toral-Barza L, Shi C, Zhang WG, Lucas J, Shor B, Kim J, Verheijen J, Curran K, Malwitz DJ. Biochemical, cellular, and in vivo activity of novel ATP-competitive and selective inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6232–6240. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0299. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Molecular Cancer are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...