• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jcmPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJCM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
J Clin Microbiol. Apr 2010; 48(4): 1026–1034.
Published online Jan 27, 2010. doi:  10.1128/JCM.01869-09
PMCID: PMC2849548

Determination of Genotypic Diversity of Mycobacterium avium Subspecies from Human and Animal Origins by Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive-Unit-Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat and IS1311 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Typing Methods [down-pointing small open triangle]


Members of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) are ubiquitous bacteria that can be found in water, food, and other environmental samples and are considered opportunistic pathogens for numerous animal species, mainly birds and pigs, as well as for humans. We have recently demonstrated the usefulness of a PCR-based mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing for the molecular characterization of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and M. avium strains exclusively isolated from AIDS patients. In the present study we extended our analysis, based on eight MIRU-VNTR markers, to a strain collection comprehensively comprising the other M. avium subspecies, including M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, and M. avium subsp. silvaticum, isolated from numerous animal species, HIV-positive and HIV-negative humans, and environmental sources. All strains were fully typeable, with the discriminatory index being 0.885, which is almost equal to that obtained by IS1311 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing as a reference. In contrast to IS1311 RFLP typing, MIRU-VNTR typing was able to further discriminate M. avium subsp. avium strains. MIRU-VNTR alleles strongly associated with or specific for M. avium subspecies were detected in several markers. Moreover, the MIRU-VNTR typing-based results were consistent with a scenario of the independent evolution of M. avium subsp. avium/M. avium subsp. silvaticum and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis from M. avium subsp. hominissuis, previously proposed on the basis of multilocus sequence analysis. MIRU-VNTR typing therefore appears to be a convenient typing method capable of distinguishing the three main subspecies and strains of the complex and providing new epidemiological knowledge on MAC.

The most frequent agents of nontuberculous mycobacterioses belong to the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC); in particular, M. avium subsp. hominissuis is a frequent agent of human mycobacterioses (12, 25). Members of this subspecies are also frequent infectious agents for pigs, leading to significant economic losses in pig farming, albeit that subspecies produces very low rates of morbidity in this animal species (23, 24). Two other MAC members, M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, are the causative agents of two other important, often fatal (2) animal pathologies, avian tuberculosis (40) and ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) (6), respectively. Like other opportunistic agents, M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. hominissuis are also capable of infecting a wide range of animal species, including cattle, deer, wild boars, goats, and horses (40). In contrast, M. avium subsp. silvaticum is taxonomically very close to M. avium subsp. avium but almost exclusively infects wood pigeons (41).

In the particular case of M. avium subsp. hominissuis, strains with similar or identical genotypes are usually found in common between pigs and human patients (26), which does not permit the potential zoonotic risk of this subspecies to be discarded. Moreover, these mycobacteria can be found in environmental sources such as water, biofilms, soil, aerosols, and phagocytic protozoa and amoebae (11), all of which can act as common sources of infection for animals and humans.

For epidemiological investigations of MAC, the current reference molecular typing technique is restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (RFLP) based on the IS1245 (47) and IS1311 (19, 20) insertion sequences. Whereas IS1311 RFLP usually generates clear hybridization patterns, IS1245 RFLP yields complex multiband patterns which are difficult to compare among different experiments and laboratories, mainly because of the heterogeneity in the intensities of the hybridization bands (19, 20, 42). Recently, an even simpler PCR-based molecular typing method, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), which is based on mycobacterial repetitive elements called mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTRs) (14, 34, 36, 37), has been described for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (38). This method presented better results for the differentiation of strains of this subspecies than those obtained by the standard IS900 RFLP method (38) and showed a promisingly good discrimination index (DI) with a panel of M. avium strains isolated from human AIDS patients (38).

In the study described here, we extended that initial study by applying MIRU-VNTR typing to a large strain panel set comprising M. avium subsp. hominissuis, M. avium subsp. avium, and M. avium subsp. silvaticum strains isolated from diverse animal and human sources. Our aim was to further analyze the power of MIRU-VNTR typing to discriminate isolates within these subspecies and to identify possible specific signatures within the complex for better characterization and detection of interspecies transmission patterns.


Strain collection and species identification.

A collection of 117 strains was assembled for this study: 62 isolated from domesticated pigs, 9 from wild birds, 4 from wood pigeons, 8 from poultry, 14 from cattle, 5 from HIV-positive (HIV+) patients, 9 from HIV-negative (HIV) patients, 2 from wild boars, 1 from a kangaroo, 1 from a goat, 1 from a cat, and 1 from a soil sample (see Table S1 in the supplemental material for details). The human isolates belonged to the Pasteur Institute (Paris, France) collection (31). The animal isolates belonged to the Animal Mycobacterioses National Reference Laboratory (AFSSA; Maisons-Alfort, France). All strains except the strains isolated from wood pigeons were grown until they reached stationary phase in 10 ml Middlebrook 7H9 broth without mycobactin. For the strains isolated from wood pigeons, considered to be M. avium subsp. silvaticum, mycobactin J was added. Strain identification was performed by biochemical and culture phenotypic characterization, which does not distinguish M. avium from M. intracellulare strains (8). In order to retain only taxonomically recognized M. avium strains and discard any M. intracellulare strains from our collection, a PCR targeting IS1245, which is present in M. avium genomes but not in M. intracellulare genomes (15, 19), was performed as described previously (19). Likewise, M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. silvaticum, and M. avium subsp. hominissuis were distinguished by testing for the presence of IS901 (22), which is present in the M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. silvaticum genomes but not in the M. avium subsp. hominissuis genome (10, 21, 30). One hundred eighty-three M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates previously studied by Thibault et al. (38) were additionally considered for analysis of the MIRU-VNTR typing results.

DNA extraction.

DNA was extracted as described previously (1), with the following modifications. The cell pellets from the centrifugation of 10 ml of concentrated culture were washed in 1 ml of 1× TE buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA). After a second centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in 400 μl of 1× TE buffer and lysed by addition of 50 μl of 10 mg/ml lysozyme and 12 h of incubation at 37°C with agitation at 650 rpm, followed by addition of 70 μl of 10% SDS and 5 μl of 10 mg/ml proteinase K and 10 min of incubation at 65°C with agitation at 650 rpm. Subsequently, 100 μl of 5 M NaCl and 100 μl of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-NaCl (10%/0.7 M) preheated at 65°C were added, followed by addition of 750 μl of isoamyl-chloroform (24/1). The aqueous phase was recovered by using Phase Lock Gels 5′-3′ (Eppendorf). DNA was precipitated with 450 μl of isopropanol and then centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 18°C and washed with 200 μl of cold 70% ethanol. After evaporation of the ethanol at 37°C, the DNA was resuspended in 1× TE buffer and standardized at a concentration of 50 ng/μl by use of a Biophotometer apparatus (Eppendorf).

MIRU-VNTR typing.

MIRU-VTNR typing was performed by using the eight loci identified as polymorphic for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis K10 and called MIRU or VNTR 292, X3, 25, 47, 3, 7, 10, and 32, as described previously (38). Repeat numbers (alleles) were determined according to the amplified fragment sizes by the use of Gel Doc 2000 (Bio-Rad) and Quantity One 4.2.1 (Bio-Rad) software for fragment size calculation and according to the results obtained with a previously described allele-calling table (38). New profiles were assigned INRA, Nouzilly, MIRU-VNTR (INMV) codes (38).

IS1311 RFLP typing.

IS1311 RFLP typing was performed as described previously (19, 20). Briefly, an IS1311 probe was obtained by PCR of the M. avium 104 reference strain (GenBank accession number NC_008595) genome, purified with QIAquick (Qiagen), and labeled by using an enhanced chemiluminescence direct labeling and detection system (Amersham, General Electric Healthcare). Genomic DNA (1 to 2 μg) was digested with the PvuII enzyme (Promega). The migrations of the restriction fragments, resolved on 0.8% agarose gels, were standardized by using a 1-kb Plus Ladder (Invitrogen) as a molecular size marker (wt/vol). The restriction fragments were blotted onto a Nytran membrane (Schleicher-Schuel) by vacuum transfer, and hybridized DNA fragments were detected according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Strain comparison.

The IS1311 RFLP and MIRU-VNTR patterns were analyzed by using Bionumerics software (version 5.0; Applied Maths, St-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Dendrograms for strain genotype comparisons were obtained by using individual or combined IS1311 RFLP and MIRU-VNTR results and the unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) clustering method. Categorical and Dice coefficients were used for the MIRU-VTNR and IS1311 RFLP (with 3% optimization, 3% size tolerance, and visual inspection) methods, respectively. As described previously (39), the MIRU-VNTR minimum-spanning tree was calculated by using the maximum number of single-locus variants (SLVs) as a priority parameter.

Calculation of discriminatory power.

The DIs for each typing methods and their combination were calculated by use of the formula described by Hunter and Gaston (16). MIRU-VNTR allelic diversity was calculated by using Nei's index (27).


MIRU-VNTR typing.

Twenty-three MIRU-VNTR patterns, called INMVs (38), were identified for the 81 M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates and 8 were identified for the 32 M. avium subsp. avium isolates, while a single pattern was observed for the 4 M. avium. subsp. silvaticum isolates (Fig. (Fig.1;1; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). None of the patterns deduced for M. avium subsp. avium matched those of M. avium subsp. hominissuis or M. avium subsp. silvaticum. Moreover, none of these MIRU-VNTR profiles matched those previously identified in M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (38). In contrast, two of the M. avium subsp. avium strain patterns and seven of the M. avium subsp. hominissuis strain patterns were identical to the MIRU-VNTR genotypes found among other, previously analyzed M. avium strains isolated from AIDS patients (38) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Among these, INMV patterns 51 and 43 consistently represented the majority of the isolates in both studies (39% and 19% of the M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates analyzed in the present study, respectively, and 26% and 29% of the M. avium isolates analyzed in the previous study, respectively). In addition, 23 genotypes were newly identified (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

FIG. 1.
Dendrogram based on combined IS1311 RFLP typing and MIRU-VNTR typing of M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, and M. avium subsp. silvaticum. One hundred seventeen strains were isolated from pigs (green), cattle (blue), humans (red), poultry ...

The allelic diversities were higher for virtually all MIRU-VNTR markers in M. avium subsp. hominissuis than in M. avium subsp. avium, and only two markers were monomorphic in the former species, whereas five markers were monomorphic in the latter species (Table (Table1),1), in keeping with the 3-fold higher number of M. avium subsp. hominissuis genotypes. In terms of the discriminatory hierarchy, locus X3 displayed the highest allelic diversity for both M. avium subsp. hominissuis and M. avium subsp. avium. Interestingly, in the latter case, this locus actually provided most of the discriminatory power per se, as the only two other informative markers (markers 10 and 32) displayed a distribution highly skewed toward one strongly overrepresented allele among two or three alleles, at most. At the other extremity, markers 3 and 7 were completely monomorphic among all the M. avium strains in our panel.

MIRU-VNTR allelic distribution among M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. silvaticum, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates

The allelic signatures strongly or strictly associated with the subspecies. Indeed, several loci were found to be monomorphic in certain taxons. For instance, allele 1 of marker 25 was exclusively restricted to and shared by all M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. silvaticum strains, while all M. avium subsp. hominissuis and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains contained two or more repeats in this locus (Table (Table1;1; see Table S1 in the supplementary material). Likewise, only minimal overlap was detected among the allelic distributions of locus 32. All of the M. avium subsp. silvaticum strains and all but one of the M. avium subsp. avium strains shared allele 7 in this marker, while all but one M. avium subsp. hominissuis strain and all but one M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strain displayed eight repeats or more. Alleles 3 and 4 of locus 292 were exclusively restricted to and shared by most M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains.

MIRU-VNTR typing versus IS1311 RFLP typing.

As was observed previously (19), two main groups could easily be distinguished by IS1311 RFLP (Fig. (Fig.1):1): one group comprising the 35 M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. silvaticum strains of our set presenting simple double-band patterns and another group comprising the 82 M. avium subsp. hominissuis strains of our collection with multiband patterns. In addition, the 31 M. avium subsp. avium isolates formed a single large cluster (named cluster J) with identical double-band patterns, which was distinct from the double-band pattern (cluster K) shared by the 4 M. avium subsp. silvaticum isolates. In contrast, within the group of M. avium subsp. hominissuis strains, only one large cluster (cluster E) of 16 isolates was observed, whereas clusters of no more than 2 strains (clusters A to D and F to I) were otherwise found.

The four strains of M. avium subsp. silvaticum were identically clustered by IS1311 RFLP and MIRU-VNTR typing into patterns K and 99, respectively (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Five other small IS1311 RFLP clusters (clusters A, C, D, F, H, and I), including M. avium subsp. hominissuis strains, were concordantly matched by MIRU-VNTR clusters.

Only two small M. avium subsp. hominissuis IS1311 RFLP clusters (clusters B and G) were subdivided by MIRU-VNTR loci, and in each case this was only by an SLV. Likewise, large IS1311 RFLP cluster E was subdivided into two MIRU-VNTR types, INMV patterns 43 and 51, that differed only by an SLV. In contrast, cluster J, which included the 31 M. avium subsp. avium isolates, was divided into eight MIRU-VNTR types (INMV patterns 44, 67, 88, 89, 90, 100, 101, and 106) that differed by one to three loci.

Conversely, the main MIRU-VNTR clusters, corresponding to INMV patterns 51 and 43 patterns, were divided by IS1311 RFLP into 21 and 9 different profiles, respectively. Some other smaller clusters were likewise subdivided: INMV patterns 53 and 107 into four profiles, INMV 97 and 42 into three profiles, and 110 into two profiles (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

Discrimination indexes were calculated for each typing method and for the two methods in combination for the strain collection as a whole and for each subspecies individually (Table (Table2).2). Each method separately provided very similar discrimination indexes (Table (Table2)2) for the total collection (0.885 for MIRU-VNTR versus 0.912 for IS1311 RFLP). The slightly better resolution power of IS1311 RFLP was explained by the better performance of IS1311 RFLP with M. avium subsp. hominissuis (0.961 versus 0.807 for MIRU-VNTR), which was better represented in this strain collection. This difference was therefore only partly compensated for by the clearly superior discriminatory power of MIRU-VNTR typing among M. avium subsp. avium strains (0.723 versus 0 for IS1311 RFLP). As a result of the ability of each method to subdivide some of the clusters defined by the other method, use of the combination of IS1311 RFLP and MIRU-VNTR gave maximal resolution power for the overall strain collection. However, this additive effect was smaller when only M. avium subsp. hominissuis was considered, as a result of the less frequent cross-subdivision of clusters obtained by the two methods for this taxon (see above).

Discrimination index (DI) of IS1311 RFLP, MIRU-VNTR used alone, and RFLP and MIRU-VNTR in combination among M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, and M. avium subsp. silvaticum isolates

Phylogeny and host preference analysis.

As it provides a high resolution power and is based on multiple independent markers, MIRU-VNTR typing is especially suitable for analysis of clonal complexes and phylogenetic groupings in closely related subspecies when the minimum-spanning-tree approach is used (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Two consistent MIRU-VNTR-based complexes were clearly identified and distinguished (complexes B and C in Fig. Fig.2)2) among the M. avium isolates, completely separating IS901-negative strains considered to be M. avium subsp. hominissuis (dark gray) and IS901-positive strains considered to be M. avium subsp. avium or M. avium subsp. silvaticum (light gray). The M. avium subsp. hominissuis complex was mostly composed of pig strains but also comprised the totality of human strains. The other complex, that of M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. silvaticum, included all the bird isolates. Within each complex, no correlation between genotype groupings and host origin or clinical status was observed among the human isolates.

FIG. 2.
Minimum spanning tree based on MIRU-VNTR typing results for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (A), M. avium subsp. hominissuis (B), M. avium subsp. avium (C), and M. avium subsp. silvaticum (D) isolates. Circles correspond to the different patterns identified ...

Furthermore, these two M. avium complexes were also separated from the complex that comprised the MIRU-VNTR genotypes of the 183 M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates (Fig. (Fig.2,2, complex A). This M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis branch mainly includes cattle isolates, as a result of their abundance in the corresponding strain collection (38).


The subspecies division of M. avium has been studied by molecular typing techniques, such as by the identification and analysis of subspecies-associated insertion elements (45) and MLSA based on gene sequence variation (43, 44). In the present study, we used a large set of M. avium isolates from different sources, including humans, pigs, and cattle, as well as rarely studied isolates from birds, poultry, and wood pigeons, to evaluate the relevance of the MIRU-VNTR markers, initially identified in M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (38), in order to (i) distinguish strains of the different subspecies, (ii) examine the genetic consistency of taxonomic separations, and (iii) analyze the correlation between genotype and host origin.

Interestingly, all the strains in the M. avium panel used in the present study were fully typeable by the use of these eight MIRU-VNTR markers when the same set of primers designed on the basis of the M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis genomic sequence was used. This observation points to both the important genetic conservation among the M. avium subspecies, in line with previous evidence (43), and the general applicability of these MIRU-VNTR markers for the whole M. avium species.

To evaluate the resolution power of the MIRU-VNTR markers, IS1311 RFLP instead of IS1245 RFLP was used as a reference method, because the former RFLP technique provides more easily interpretable patterns (especially for M. avium subsp. hominissuis) and has discriminatory power almost equal to that of the latter one (19, 20). MIRU-VNTR and IS1311 RFLP typing overall provided very similar discrimination indexes for the total collection, but the maximal resolution power for the total strain collection was obtained by using the combination of both methods. Whereas IS1311 RFLP typing offered the better resolution of M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates, only MIRU-VNTR typing was capable of discriminating M. avium subsp. avium strains. In the latter case, the corresponding large IS1311 RFLP cluster (cluster J) was subdivided by one to three MIRU-VNTR markers, while three other IS1311 RFLP clusters in the rest of the collection were subdivided by SLVs. The other six RFLP clusters were fully matched by MIRU-VNTR clusters. Although it was not possible to test the clonal stability of the MIRU-VNTR markers with this set of M. avium strains, the same markers were found to be clonally stable among different M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis vaccine batches (38). This suggests that most of the subdivisions of IS1311 RFLP clusters by MIRU-VNTR markers (even by SLVs) are probably epidemiologically meaningful; i.e., they reflect infection by different strains. The same conclusion has been reached for the interpretation of MIRU-VNTR genotypic differences between M. tuberculosis isolates, based on the analysis of large sets of epidemiologically well defined strains (33, 35, 46).

Most of the discriminatory power of typing by MIRU-VNTR analysis was clearly concentrated in a few more variable markers, especially at the infrataxon level. Interestingly, however, allelic signatures strictly or strongly associated with subspecies were identified for several MIRU-VNTR markers, including some monomorphic loci within taxons (e.g., alleles 1 and ≥2 of marker 25 were restricted to M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. silvaticum strains and M. avium subsp. hominissuis and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains, respectively; alleles 3 and 4 of locus 292 were restricted to most M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains) (Table (Table2).2). As a result of this minimal overlap among the allelic distributions between the different subspecies, MIRU-VNTR-based genotype complexes were found to perfectly correlate with the separation of IS901-negative strains considered to be M. avium subsp. hominissuis and IS901-positive strains considered to be M. avium subsp. avium or M. avium subsp. silvaticum (Fig. (Fig.2).2). In turn, these two complexes were perfectly separated from the complex grouping 183 M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates typed with the same MIRU-VNTR markers (38).

MLSA of 56 strains indicated more genetic variability and a more nonclonal population structure in M. avium subsp. hominissuis than in M. avium subsp. avium/M. avium subsp. silvaticum and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. The results suggested that M. avium subsp. hominissuis represents a heterogeneous group of organisms from which the other subspecies have evolved as two independent pathogenic clones (43). The results of MIRU-VNTR-based analysis of our larger collection of 300 isolates (including results published previously [38]) (Fig. (Fig.2)2) are fully consistent with this scenario of independent evolution from a M. avium subsp. hominissuis-like pool. Within our sampling limits, more variability was also seen among M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates, as reflected by a higher number of independently connected genotypes across the minimum-spanning tree. This contrasts with the common connection of many peripheral, minor genotypes to two central, major genotypes for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, indicative of some variants arising from only two major clones (corresponding to INMV patterns 1 and 2 [38]). Thus, analysis of a small set of MIRU-VNTR loci, particularly those that are more phylogenetically informative (i.e., with subspecies-specific allelic distributions; see above), is sufficient for obtaining a taxonomic classification equivalent to that obtained by MLSA or other molecular typing methods (19, 20, 43).

Concerning the relevance of distinguishing M. avium subsp. silvaticum from M. avium subsp. avium strains (45), we note that both IS1311 RFLP and MIRU-VNTR typing distinguished the corresponding isolates in this panel. However, the variations were very limited, as is the case with MLSA (43). Variations consisted of band positions in a common two-band RFLP pattern and MIRU-VNTR SLVs between the respective strain clusters. A clear limitation is that our strain panel and that of Turenne et al. (43) included only four and three strains of M. avium subsp. silvaticum, respectively, revealing the small number of strains described in the literature. Whether M. avium subsp. silvaticum can be monophyletically distinguished from M. avium subsp. avium will require analysis of a larger and more representative set of strains.

As for MLSA (43), the M. avium subsp. hominissuis MIRU-VNTR-based complex included mostly pig and human isolates, but no bird isolates. This is consistent with the notion that M. avium subsp. hominissuis is an environmental bacterium that specifically causes opportunistic infections in some mammals, such as swine, and immunocompromised or immunocompetent people with some predisposing factors (3, 7, 13, 29). Therefore, the finding of identical genotypes between pig and human isolates, also observed by IS1245 RFLP typing (38), may indicate common sources of infection but does not exclude a potential zoonotic risk of this subspecies. Similarly, the M. avium subsp. avium/M. avium subsp. silvaticum MIRU-VNTR-based complex included all the bird isolates but also isolates from other animal species, some of which had the same genotypes as the avian strains. This could also be explained by the ubiquitous environmental distribution of these bird pathogens and/or by host spillover effects (43).

Before molecular typing was developed, the different M. avium types within the MAC were defined by serotyping. Thirty-one distinct MAC serovars were established by the presence of surface-located glycopeptidolipids (GPLs) harboring various glycosylation patterns (5). More precisely, serotypes 1 to 6, 8 to 11, 21, and 28 were assigned to M. avium, either to M. avium subsp. avium or M. avium subsp. hominissuis, while serotypes 7, 12 to 20, and 25 were assigned to M. intracellulare (10, 18, 25, 48). Many previous reports describing inter-animal species transmission patterns based on such serotyping data have been published, and environmental distribution studies were done on the basis of such serotyping data. Although it is difficult to compare the results obtained by this technique due to its lack of standardization (9), it would be interesting to analyze the correlation between MIRU-VNTR types and serotypes, in order to capitalize on previous knowledge related to strain, virulence, host preference, and zoonotic risk.

In conclusion, we demonstrated here that MIRU-VNTR markers can be used for the subspecies and infra- and intrasubspecies differentiation of strains of any subspecies of MAC. The technical ease of performance of PCR and the numerical genotype format make this method a very useful additional tool that can be applied as a first-line analysis technique or as a complement to MLSA or classical RFLP methods. In addition to our first report, other reports have described the use of MIRU-VNTR markers for the genotyping of MAC strains (4, 17, 28, 32). In particular, Inagaki et al. described the use of some additional VNTR loci for the typing of a panel of M. avium subsp. hominissuis strains, but these were only strains of human origin (17). Three of our eight markers, namely, MIRU-VNTR 292, 10, and X3, were also used in one or more of those studies. To facilitate the use of these markers and future comparisons between studies, we recommend that the same primers and allele calling system used in our studies be used (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). As for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (35), a consensus-based MIRU-VNTR typing method could thus become the new standard for refined molecular epidemiological screening, to analyze the origins and transmission patterns of M. avium mycobacterioses in human and animal outbreaks.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]


This work received support from the Veterinary Network of Laboratories Researching into Improved Diagnosis and Epidemiology of Mycobacterial Diseases (VENoMYC). This work was supported by the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique and Agence Française de la Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (contract AIP P00297).

P.S. is a researcher of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).


[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 27 January 2010.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/.


1. Baulard, A., L. Kremer, and C. Locht. 1996. Efficient homologous recombination in fast-growing and slow-growing mycobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178:3091-3098. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Biet, F., M. L. Boschiroli, M. F. Thorel, and L. A. Guilloteau. 2005. Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC). Vet. Res. 36:411-436. [PubMed]
3. Bodle, E. E., J. A. Cunningham, P. Della-Latta, N. W. Schluger, and L. Saiman. 2008. Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients without HIV infection, New York City. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14:390-396. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Bull, T. J., K. Sidi-Boumedine, E. J. McMinn, K. Stevenson, R. Pickup, and J. Hermon-Taylor. 2003. Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units (MIRU) differentiate Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis from other species of the Mycobacterium avium complex. Mol. Cell. Probes 17:157-164. [PubMed]
5. Chatterjee, D., and K. H. Khoo. 2001. The surface glycopeptidolipids of mycobacteria: structures and biological properties. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58:2018-2042. [PubMed]
6. Cocito, C., P. Gilot, M. Coene, M. de Kesel, P. Poupart, and P. Vannuffel. 1994. Paratuberculosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 3:328-345. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Dailloux, M., M. L. Abalain, C. Laurain, L. Lebrun, C. Loos-Ayav, A. Lozniewski, and J. Maugein. 2006. Respiratory infections associated with nontuberculous mycobacteria in non-HIV patients. Eur. Respir. J. 28:1211-1215. [PubMed]
8. David, H., V. Lévy-Frebault, and M. F. Thorel. 1989. Isolement des mycobactéries à partir de produits pathologiques d'origine humaine et animal, p. 29-43. In Méthodes de laboratoire pour mycobactériologie clinique. Commission des Laboratoires de Référence et d'Expertise, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
9. Dvorska, L., M. Bartos, O. Ostadal, J. Kaustova, L. Matlova, and I. Pavlik. 2002. IS1311 and IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses, serotypes, and drug susceptibilities of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates obtained from a human immunodeficiency virus-negative patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3712-3719. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Dvorska, L., L. Matlova, M. Bartos, I. Parmova, J. Bartl, P. Svastova, J. T. Bull, and I. Pavlik. 2004. Study of Mycobacterium avium complex strains isolated from cattle in the Czech Republic between 1996 and 2000. Vet. Microbiol. 99:239-250. [PubMed]
11. Falkinham, J. O. 2004. Environmental sources of Mycobacterium avium linked to routes of exposure, p. 26-38. In S. Pedley, J. Bartram, G. Rees, A. Dufour, and J. Cotruvo (ed.), Pathogenic mycobacteria in water: a guide to public health consequences, monitoring and management. IWA Publishing, London, United Kingdom.
12. Falkinham, J. O. 1996. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 9:177-215. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Field, S. K., D. Fisher, and R. L. Cowie. 2004. Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease in patients without HIV infection. Chest 126:566-581. [PubMed]
14. Frothingham, R., and W. A. Meeker-O'ConnelI. 1998. Genetic diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on variable numbers of tandem DNA repeats. Microbiology 144:1189-1196. [PubMed]
15. Guerrero, C., C. BernasconiI, D. Burki, T. Bodmer, and A. Telenti. 1995. A novel insertion element from Mycobacterium avium, IS1245, is a specific target for analysis of strain relatedness. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:304-307. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hunter, P. R., and M. A. Gaston. 1988. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:2465-2466. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Inagaki, T., K. Nishimori, T. Yagi, K. Ichikawa, M. Moriyama, T. Nakagawa, T. Shibayama, K. Uchiya, T. Nikai, and K. Ogaw. 2009. Comparison of a variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) method for typing Mycobacterium avium with mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-VNTR and IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:2156-2164. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Inderlied, C. B., C. A. Kemper, and L. M. Bermudez. 1993. The Mycobacterium avium complex. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6:266-310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Johansen, T. B., B. Djønne, M. R. Jensen, and I. Olsen. 2005. Distribution of IS1311 and IS1245 in Mycobacterium avium subspecies revisited. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2500-2502. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Johansen, T. B., I. Olsen, M. R. Jensen, U. R. Dahle, G. Holstad, and B. Djønne. 2007. New probes used for IS1245 and IS1311 restriction fragment length polymorphism of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis isolates of human and animal origin in Norway. BMC Microbiol. 7:1-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Kunze, Z. M., F. Portaels, and J. J. McFadden. 1992. Biologically distinct subtypes of Mycobacterium avium differ in possession of insertion sequence IS901. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2366-2372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Kunze, Z. M., S. Wall, R. Appelberg, M. T. Silva, F. Portaels, and J. J. McFadden. 1991. IS901, a new member of a widespread class of atypical insertion sequences, is associated with pathogenicity in Mycobacterium avium. Mol. Microbiol. 5:2265-2272. [PubMed]
23. Matlova, L., L. Dvorska, W. Y. Ayele, M. Bartos, T. Amemori, and I. Pavlik. 2005. Distribution of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates in tissue samples of pigs fed peat naturally contaminated with mycobacteria as a supplement. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:1261-1268. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Matlova, L., L. Dvorska, K. Palecek, L. Maurenc, M. Bartos, and I. Pavlik. 2004. Impact of sawdust and wood shavings in bedding on pig tuberculous lesions in lymph nodes, and IS1245 RFLP analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis of serotypes 6 and 8 isolates from pigs and environments. Vet. Microbiol. 102:227-236. [PubMed]
25. Mijs, W., P. de Haas, R. Rossau, T. van der Laan, L. Rigouts, F. Portaels, and D. van Soolingen. 2002. Molecular evidence to support a proposal to reserve the designation Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium for bird-type isolates and M. avium subsp. hominissuis for the human/porcine type of M. avium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1505-1518. [PubMed]
26. Möbius, P., P. Lentzsch, I. Moser, L. Naumann, G. Martin, and H. Köhler. 2006. Comparative macrorestriction and RFLP analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis isolates from man, pig, and cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 117:284-291. [PubMed]
27. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Overduin, P., L. Schouls, P. Roholl, A. van der Zanden, N. Mahmmod, A. Herrewegh, and D. van Soolingen. 2004. Use of multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for typing Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:5022-5028. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Parrish, S. C., J. Myers, and A. Lazarus. 2008. Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infections in non-HIV patients. Postgrad. Med. 120:78-86. [PubMed]
30. Pavlik, I., P. Svastova, J. Bartl, L. Dvorska, and I. Rychlik. 2000. Relationship between IS901 in the Mycobacterium avium complex strains isolated from birds, animals, humans, and the environment and virulence for poultry. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 7:212-217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Picardeau, M., A. Varnerot, T. Lecompte, F. Brel, T. May, and V. Vincent. 1997. Use of different molecular typing techniques for bacteriological follow-up in a clinical trial with AIDS patients with Mycobacterium avium bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2503-2510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Romano, M. I., A. Amadio, F. Bigi, L. Klepp, I. Etchechoury, M. N. Llana, C. Morsella, F. Paolicchi, I. Pavlik, M. Bartos, S. C. Leäo, and A. Cataldi. 2005. Further analysis of VNTR and MIRU in the genome of Mycobacterium avium complex, and application to molecular epidemiology of isolates from South America. Vet. Microbiol. 110:221-237. [PubMed]
33. Savine, E., R. M. Warren, G. D. van der Spuy, N. Beyers, P. D. van Helden, C. Locht, and P. Supply. 2002. Stability of variable-number tandem repeats of mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units from 12 loci in serial isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4561-4566. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Skuce, R. A., T. P. McCorry, J. F. McCarroll, S. M. M. Roring, A. N. Scott, D. Brittain, S. L. Hughes, R. Glyn Hewinson, and S. D. Neill. 2002. Discrimination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria using novel VNTR-PCR targets. Microbiology 148:519-528. [PubMed]
35. Supply, P., C. Allix, S. Lesjean, M. Cardoso-Oelemann, S. Rüsch-Gerdes, E. Willery, E. Savine, P. de Haas, H. van Deutekom, S. Roring, P. Bifani, N. Kurepina, B. Kreiswirth, C. Sola, N. Rastogi, V. Vatin, M. C. Gutierrez, M. Fauville, S. Niemann, R. Skuce, K. Kremer, C. Locht, and D. van Soolingen. 2006. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4498-4510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Supply, P., J. Magdalena, S. Himpens, and C. Locht. 1997. Identification of novel intergenic repetitive units in a mycobacterial two-component system operon. Mol. Microbiol. 26:991-1003. [PubMed]
37. Supply, P., E. Mazars, S. Lesjean, V. Vincent, B. Gicquel, and C. Locht. 2000. Variable human minisatellite-like regions in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome. Mol. Microbiol. 36:762-771. [PubMed]
38. Thibault, V. C., M. Grayon, M. L. Boschiroli, C. Hubbans, P. Overduin, K. Stevenson, M. C. Gutierrez, P. Supply, and F. Biet. 2007. New variable-number tandem-repeat markers for typing Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and M. avium strains: comparison with IS900 and IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2404-2410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Thibault, V. C., M. Grayon, M. L. Boschiroli, E. Willery, C. Allix-Béguec, K. Stevenson, F. Biet, and P. Supply. 2008. Combined multilocus short-sequence-repeat and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem-repeat typing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:4091-4094. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Thorel, M. F., H. Huchzermeyer, R. Weiss, and J. J. Fontaine. 1997. Mycobacterium avium infections in animals. Vet. Res. 28:439-447. [PubMed]
41. Thorel, M. F., M. Krichevsky, and V. V. Lévy-Frébault. 1990. Numerical taxonomy of mycobactin-dependent mycobacteria, emended description of Mycobacterium avium, and description of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium subsp. nov., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis subsp. nov., Mycobacterium avium subsp. silvaticum subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40:254-260. [PubMed]
42. Tirkkonen, T., J. Pakarinen, A. M. Moisander, J. Makinen, H. Soini, and T. Ali-Vehmas. 2007. High genetic relatedness among Mycobacterium avium strains isolated from pigs and humans revealed by comparative IS1245 RFLP analysis. Vet. Microbiol. 125:175-181. [PubMed]
43. Turenne, C. Y., D. M. Collins, D. C. Alexander, and M. A. Behr. 2008. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and M. avium subsp. avium are independently evolved pathogenic clones of a much broader group of M. avium organisms. J. Bacteriol. 190:2479-2487. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Turenne, C. Y., M. Semret, D. V. Cousins, D. M. Collins, and M. A. Behr. 2006. Sequencing of hsp65 distinguishes among subsets of the Mycobacterium avium complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:433-440. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Turenne, C. Y., R. J. Wallace, and M. A. Behr. 2007. Mycobacterium avium in the postgenomic era. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20:205-229. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. van Deutekom, H., P. Supply, P. E. W. de Haas, E. Willery, S. P. Hoijng, C. Locht, R. A. Coutinho, and D. van Soolingen. 2005. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat analysis, a more accurate method for identifying epidemiological links between patients with tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4473-4479. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. van Soolingen, D., J. Bauer, V. Ritacco, S. L. O. Cardoso, I. Pavlik, V. Vincent, N. Rastogi, A. Gori, T. Bodmer, C. Garzelli, and M. J. Garcia. 1998. IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of Mycobacterium avium isolates: proposal for standardization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3051-3054. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Wayne, L. G., R. C. Good, A. Tsang, R. Butler, D. Dawson, D. Groothuis, W. Gross, J. Hawkins, J. Kilburn, M. Kubin, K. H. Schröder, V. A. Silcox, C. Smith, M. F. Thorel, C. Woodley, and M. A. Yakrus. 1993. Serovar determination and molecular taxonomic correlation in Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium scrofulaceum: a cooperative study of the International Working Group on Mycobacterial Taxonomy. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:482-489. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...