• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 7, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2846107

Multiscale Mechanics of Fibrin Polymer: Gel Stretching with Protein Unfolding and Loss of Water


Blood clots and thrombi consist primarily of a mesh of branched fibers made of the protein fibrin. We propose a molecular basis for the marked extensibility and negative compressibility of fibrin gels based on the structural and mechanical properties of clots at the network, fiber, and molecular levels. The force required to stretch a clot initially rises linearly and is accompanied by a dramatic decrease in clot volume and a peak in compressibility. These macroscopic transitions are accompanied by fiber alignment and bundling after forced protein unfolding. Constitutive models are developed to integrate observations at spatial scales that span six orders of magnitude and indicate that gel extensibility and expulsion of water are both manifestations of protein unfolding, which is not apparent in other matrix proteins such as collagen.

Fibrin clots are proteinaceous gels that polymerize in the blood as a consequence of biochemical cascades at sites of vascular injury. Together with platelets, this meshwork stops bleeding and supports active contraction during wound healing (1, 2). Fibrin also provides a scaffold for thrombi, clots that block blood vessels and cause tissue damage, leading to myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases (3). To maintain hemostasis while minimizing the impact of thrombosis, fibrin must have suitable stiffness and plasticity (4), but also sufficient permeability so that the network can be effectively decomposed (lysed) by proteolytic enzymes (5, 6). It is challenging to meet all of these conditions because open scaffolds would be expected to break at low strains, as is true for collagen gels (7). To address how fibrin clots are both permeable and highly extensible, we studied fibrin structures across multiple spatial scales, from whole clots to single fibers and single molecules (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
Blood clots are highly extensible supramolecular protein polymers formed from well-separated, relatively straight and stiff fibers ~200 nm in diameter. When stretched (see movie S1), the fiber network aligns in the direction of the applied strain and ...

Fibrin clots were made from purified human fibrinogen under conditions (8) that resulted in the formation of long, straight fibers, similar to those found in physiological clots. To simplify the interpretation, the clots were covalently ligated with the use of a transglutaminase (blood clotting factor XIIIa), as naturally occurs in the blood, which prevents protofibrils from sliding past one another, thus eliminating persistent creep (9).

Measurements of the extensibility of 2-mm-diameter fibrin clots (Fig. 2A) demonstrated that the clots could be stretched to more than three times their relaxed length before breaking, with an average stretch of 2.7 ± 0.15–fold (n =6)(10). This is comparable to the single-fiber extensibility that is observed when a fibrin fiber is laterally stretched with an atomic force microscope (11). Qualitatively, the resulting force-strain curve for fibrin is similar to those observed for rubbers and other materials made from flexible chains (12). However, for fibrin clots, which are made of longer, straighter fibers than the thermally fluctuating polymer chains in rubber, models of rubber-like elasticity predict a branching density that is wrong by seven orders of magnitude (4). Therefore, new models are needed to understand clot mechanics.

Fig. 2
(A)Representative force-extension curve of a cylindrical fibrin clot reaching a threefold longitudinal stretch. The average stretch before breaking was 2.7 ± 0.15–fold (mean ± SEM, n = 6 experiments). As the strain (stretched length/initial ...

In addition to the large extensibility of fibrin clots, these gels also displayed a dramatic decrease in volume upon stretching [supporting online material (SOM) movie S1], unlike most rubbery materials. This unusual effect is quantified in Fig. 2B where the lateral contraction of the gel λ* allows one to calculate the relative volume (λ1λ2), which is plotted as function of strain (black circles) and contrasted with a volume-conserving incompressible material (black dashed line). The shrinkage of the stretched clot was due to water expulsion, as confirmed by an ~10-fold increase in the protein content in clots at a strain of 2 (fig. S1B). This protein concentrating effect, or syneresis, is mechanically induced and corresponds to a negative compressibility for the gel (Fig. 2B, inset); the intrinsic compressibility of proteins is usually positive and small, ~2 × 10−4 MPa−1 (Fig. 2B inset, open circle) (13). This effect might be related to the phenomenon of negative normal stress observed for networks of semiflexible polymers, because even though fibrin fibers are relatively stiff, it is still possible that they buckle more easily than they stretch, thus leading to an effective inward force (14). However, our data below support an alternative explanation in which the volume change is associated with protein unfolding and bundling of stretched fibrin fibers.

To understand what makes fibrin so different from other highly extensible polymers, including rubbers and hydrogels, we quantified the structural changes that occur in stretched clots at the network and fiber levels. Unstrained clots imaged with the use of scanning electron microscopy have well-separated fibers with an essentially random orientation (Fig. 3A, top image). When strain is applied (Fig. 3A, lower images), the fibers begin to align and the network orientational order parameter (15) increases gradually from 0.1 to 0.7 at a strain of ~2.5 (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
Structural changes in stretched fibrin clots at the network and fiber levels. Scanning electron micrographs of stretched clots (A) show how the fibrin fibers align with strain. (B) These scanning electron micrographs are segmented using a Laplace of Gaussian ...

Transmission electron microscopy of transverse sections through fibrin clots at increasing strain (Fig. 3C, insets) provides a clear picture of how the fibers become thinner, closer together, and bundle. The area occupied by fibers increases from ~5 to 24% at a strain of 2 (Fig. 3C, graph). This increase is smaller than expected given the macroscopic shrinkage of the entire clot (see SOM), indicating that the volume decrease is a combined result of fiber bundling and a decrease in fiber diameter from 185 ± 36 to 74 ± 16 nm (mean ± SD, P << 0.0001, Student's t test). Similar transmission electron micrographs (although without corresponding scanning electron micrographs) of fiber ordering have been reported (16), but quantifying the strain dependence of these observations proves important below in constraining possible models. Furthermore, knowing the stress applied and the fractional cross section occupied by fibers allows for an estimate of the force per protofibril of ~75 pN at a strain of 2. Given the small loading rate that we used, this force is large enough to result in substantial unfolding of fibrin (17). Protein unfolding is generally associated with increased exposure of hydrophobic groups that would tend to interact (e.g., bundle) and expel water, as observed here.

The half-staggered packing of fibrin (Fig. 4A) leads to a ~22-nm repeat that can be measured by small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS), and this measurement can be used as a readout of the molecular length (18). The position of the peak corresponding to the 22-nm spacing does not change substantially as the clot is stretched (Fig. 4B), ruling out a gradual extension of molecules during the stretch, which would otherwise increase this spacing, as suggested by Roska et al.(19). The marked increase in peak width that we observed indicates an increase in disorder that is consistent with an increasing number of molecules unfolding in response to the large strain. This increase in disorder is captured by the decrease in the Scherrer length L (Fig. 4C): The length over which the 22-nm repeat is correlated (20). A decrease in L indicates that the average size of the regions containing a consistent 22-nm repeat becomes smaller because of intervening regions of unfolded molecules. To control for the effect on L of fiber alignment that accompanies strain, we made magnetically prealigned samples in which the fibers were already oriented along the direction of applied strain. In this case, the decrease in L occurs at lower strains because fiber alignment cannot take up as much of the applied strain (Fig. 4C, blue circles). This change is reversible when fibers are allowed to relax (Fig. 4C, blue arrow). Similarly, to control for fiber sliding as an alternative mechanism of strain accommodation, we stretched samples that were not covalently ligated using factor XIIIa. Without ligation, protofibrils slide with respect to each other instead of stretching, and unfolding is suppressed (Fig. 4C, black circles). This behavior is expected for two-state extension in which some molecules extend completely while others remain folded, consistent with our earlier single-molecule observations of the forced unfolding of coiled coils in fibrinogen oligomers (17). A more gradual unfolding has been observed in molecular dynamics simulations (21), but the coiled-coil spanning αC region is missing from published crystal structures of fibrinogen and is therefore not included in the simulation. Early wide-angle x-ray scattering measurements of fibrin clots support this view of molecular extension (22), providing evidence for a folding transition from α helix to β sheet, as has been observed for stretched keratin (23, 24).

Fig. 4
Structural changes in stretched fibrin clots at the molecular level. (A) Schematic of afibrin protofibril showing the half-staggered pattern that leads to a characteristic 22-nm repeat. A fibrin monomer within the protofibril is shown in red. (B) SAXS ...

When these results are taken together, the following picture of fibrin mechanics emerges (Fig. 1). Because fibrin fibers are straight and relatively stiff, thermally induced bends are negligible, and so there is no slack to be pulled out upon extension. Instead, even at relatively low strains, the fibers themselves must begin to orient and stretch along the direction of the applied strain. The volume fraction of protein within the fibers has been estimated at ~20% (25), and the protofibrils that make up the fibers are known to adopt a twisted conformation (26) so that, at low strains, fibers could stretch somewhat by having protofibrils straighten and untwist within the fibers. However, to reach even a strain of ~0.15, unfolding must start to play a role. It is this structural transition that allows fibrin clots to maintain their linear response until strains of 1.2, at which point the coiled coils, or perhaps some other compact structures, are stretched to near their unfolded contour lengths, leading to strain hardening. The unfolded domains then interact and expel water, as many denatured proteins do.

To quantitatively test this mechanism, two approaches to model the stress-strain behavior of networks of semi-flexible filaments can be adapted for fibrin. A first model for random networks of folded proteins (27) uses a system of connected fibers. Although this model is not explicitly based on the microscopic structure of the network, it has been shown to accurately describe other random networks and serves to connect the microscopic and macroscopic processes. This leads to an expression for the force-extension (or stress-strain) relation of the network in terms of the force-extension relation of a single fiber. The molecules making up the fiber are modeled as two-state systems that can be either folded, in which case the fiber behaves as a linear spring, or unfolded, in which case it is modeled as a wormlike chain (28) (see SOM).

An alternative model of filamentous gels starts from the assumption that the networks are homogeneous and isotropic, and strain uniformly (29). Such a model can be used to compute the mechanical properties of the network after choosing a fiber force-extension curve as above. This model captures the trend in the data if buckling is taken into account by setting the force on a fiber to zero whenever it is under compression.

With either modeling approach, protein unfolding is required to fit the experimental data. Without unfolding, the fit rapidly diverges from the experimental force-extension curve (Fig. 2A, black dashed line). The fraction of folded domains nf determined from the model correlates with the decreasing Scherrer length L observed with SAXS (Fig. 4D), providing further evidence that sample disordering is due to molecular extension. The divergence at high strains is probably due to unfolding of structures in the fibrin molecules other than coiled coils, which has been suggested as a possible mechanism to account for the extensibility of single fibrin fibers (11) and could be straightforwardly incorporated into our model to fit the force-extension data at the highest strains. In contrast, a linear model without unfolding fits collagen force extension data reasonably well (see SOM). This further highlights the uniqueness of fibrin's ability to balance large extensibility with a large pore size.

To account for the measured volume change in addition to the other results, we modified the first model (27) by associating a volume decrease with the unfolding transition. By matching the volume change at high strain, we determined the fractional volume change per domain and then, with no further fitting, the observed volume drop at low strain was captured using the same parameters as those used to fit the force-extension curve (compare Figs. Figs.2B2B and and4D).4D). The approximate fit to the negative peak in the compressibility (Fig. 2B, inset) further increases confidence in the model and again suggests a connection between clot shrinkage and an unfolding transition (SOM Eq. 29). A likely mechanism is aggregation that buries hydrophobic residues exposed during forced unfolding of protein (fig. S3).

Thus, it is the molecular extensibility of fibrin that allows clots' long straight fibers to extend and that endows them with essential properties, such as large pore sizes and low fibrin volume fraction in combination with extensibility. This allows for efficient permeation and lysis of clots (5) and maintenance of mechanical integrity in dynamic environments (e.g., platelet-induced clot retraction, skin and internal wounds that could stretch during healing, arterial thrombi, and pulsatory thrombotic aneurysms). The fact that these molecular transitions occur at small strains that cells can exert (30) and are manifested directly in the macroscopic mechanics of fibrin may represent a clear example of an important biological function of forced protein unfolding, as also demonstrated for some proteins in stressed cells (31). Unfolded domains could be promising targets for modification in applications such as tissue engineering and cell biophysics, where stiffness is known to be important (30), and for designs of tougher fibrin sealants used in surgeries (32). Controlling unfolding could also lead to new strategies for breaking thrombi, perhaps by stabilizing the coiled coil, rendering clots more brittle for thrombectomy, or by destabilizing the coiled coil, making clots softer and less occlusive. Structural transitions observable at multiple scales may also be involved in the mechanics of other protein assemblies.

Supplementary Material



We thank P. Heiney for help with the x-ray diffraction measurements (NSF–Materials Research Science and Engineering Center partial support); C. Nagaswami for scanning electron microscopy; D. Galanakis for his gift of fibrinogen; S. Pickup for access to the magnet facility; A. Kota for help with the tensile testing; J. Torbet for discussions of x-ray diffraction and magnetic alignment; and P. Janmey, T. Lubensky, H. Shuman, and C. Storm for useful discussions. This work was supported by NIH (grants HL090774 and HL30954 to J.W.W. and grant HL62352 to D.E.D.) and by the Nano/Bio Interface Center through NSF Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center (grant DMR-0425780). A.E.X.B. was supported by a scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.


Supporting Online Material


Materials and Methods

SOM Text

Figs. S1 to S11


Movie S1

References and Notes

1. Weisel JW. Advances in Protein Chemistry. Vol. 70. Academic Press; London: 2005. pp. 247–299. [PubMed]
2. Laurens N, Koolwijk P, DeMaat MPM. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2006;4:932. [PubMed]
3. Colman RW, et al. Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2005.
4. Weisel JW. Biophys. Chem. 2004;112:267. [PubMed]
5. Collet JP, et al. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000;20:1354. [PubMed]
6. Gabriel DA, Muga K, Boothroyd EM. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:24259. [PubMed]
7. Roeder BA, et al. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002;124:214. [PubMed]
8. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
9. Janmey PA, Amis EJ, Ferry JD. J. Rheol. 1983;27:135.
10. The clots typically break where they are clamped, suggesting that the true clot extensibility is larger than that measured here.
11. Liu W, et al. Science. 2006;313:634. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Treloar LRG. The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. Clarendon; Oxford: 1975.
13. Kharakoz DP. Biophys. J. 2000;79:511. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Kang H, et al. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:3799. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. The orientational order parameter is defined as <cos2θ>, where θ is the angle of the fiber determined at each fiber pixel (see SOM for a description of the analysis algorithm).
16. Müller MF, Ris H, Ferry JD. J. Mol. Biol. 1984;174:369. [PubMed]
17. Brown AEX, Litvinov RI, Discher DE, Weisel JW. Biophys. J. 2007;92:L39. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Stryer L, Cohen C, Langridge R. Nature. 1963;197:793. [PubMed]
19. Roska FJ, Ferry JD, Lin JS, Anderegg JW. Biopolymers. 1982;21:1833. [PubMed]
20. Alexander LE. X-Ray Diffraction Methods in Polymer Science. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ: 1979.
21. Lim BBC, Lee EH, Sotomayor M, Schulten K. Structure. 2008;16:449. [PubMed]
22. Bailey K, Astbury WT, Rudall KM. Nature. 1943;151:716.
23. Astbury WT, Woods HJ. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1934;114:314.
24. Hearle JWS. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2000;27:123. [PubMed]
25. Voter WA, Lucaveche C, Erickson HP. Biopolymers. 1986;25:2375. [PubMed]
26. Weisel JW, Nagaswami C, Makowski L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987;84:8991. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Qi HJ, Ortiz C, Boyce MC. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2006;128:509.
28. Bustamante C, Marko JF, Siggia ED, Smith S. Science. 1994;265:1599. [PubMed]
29. Storm C, et al. Nature. 2005;435:191. [PubMed]
30. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y.-l. Science. 2005;310:1139. [PubMed]
31. Johnson CP, Tang H-Y, Carag C, Speicher DW, Discher DE. Science. 2007;317:663. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Albala DM. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003;11:5. [PubMed]


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...