• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of developeTOCContact usSubmitCurrent IssueAbout usView PDFDevelopment
Development. Mar 15, 2010; 137(6): 859–870.
PMCID: PMC2834456

Maternal control of early mouse development


The hiatus between oocyte and embryonic gene transcription dictates a role for stored maternal factors in early mammalian development. Encoded by maternal-effect genes, these factors accumulate during oogenesis and enable the activation of the embryonic genome, the subsequent cleavage stages of embryogenesis and the initial establishment of embryonic cell lineages. Recent studies in mice have yielded new findings on the role of maternally provided proteins and multi-component complexes in preimplantation development. Nevertheless, significant gaps remain in our mechanistic understanding of the networks that regulate early mammalian embryogenesis, which provide an impetus and opportunities for future investigations.

Keywords: Maternal-effect genes, Mater (Nlrp5), Floped (Ooep), Padi6, Tle6, Filia, Embryonic cell lineage, Cleavage-stage arrest, Embryonic gene activation, Preimplantation development, Subcortical maternal complex


Mammalian gametes share an unequal burden in ensuring the successful initiation of development. Following acrosome exocytosis and penetration of the zona pellucida (see Glossary, Box 1), the mouse sperm fuses with the plasma membrane of the egg and is incorporated into the cytoplasm. The haploid sperm provides DNA for the male pronucleus and is essential for egg activation (Saunders et al., 2002). However, the sperm mitochondria (Shitara et al., 1998), the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) precursors (Schatten et al., 1985) and the stored cellular components of the sperm play no major role in cleavage-stage embryogenesis (Sutovsky and Schatten, 2000). Thus, the early embryo is almost entirely dependent on the egg for its initial complement of the subcellular organelles and macromolecules that are required for survival prior to the robust activation of the embryonic genome at cleavage-stage development (Fig. 1A). These maternal components are encoded by maternal-effect genes.

Box 1. Glossary

Acrosome. A Golgi-derived subcellular organelle underlying the head of mature sperm. Initial sperm-egg recognition triggers exocytosis of lytic enzymes, the functions of which remain enigmatic.

Ampulla. The portion of the oviduct closest to the ovary and site of fertilization.

Autoimmune oophoritis. A T-cell-mediated inflammation of ovaries induced in C57BL/6 thymectomized mice and a fortuitous source of antibodies that recognize MATER.

Blastocyst. A ≥32-cell embryo with a developing fluid-filled internal blastocoel.

Cleavage-stage embryogenesis. The first three cell divisions of embryonic development prior to compaction to form the morula.

Compaction. After the third cell division, blastomeres increase cell surface contacts with one another to form the morula, with morphologically obscured cell-cell contacts.

Embryonic gene activation. When the embryonic genome initiates transcription at the 1- to 2-cell stage and becomes the primary regulator of development.

Equatorial cleavage. When the plane of cytoplasmic cleavage passes orthogonal to the egg axis (i.e. at right angles to meridional cleavage).

Genomic imprinting. The process whereby a gene or genomic domain is biochemically marked (usually by DNA methylation) with information about its parental origin.

Imprinting control region (ICR). A region of DNA with sexually dimorphic methylation that directs silencing of gene clusters on the maternal or paternal allele to ensure monoallelic expression of a locus.

Inner cell mass (ICM). The ICM is derived from the inner cells of the morula and is eccentrically located in the blastocysts. It provides precursor cells for the developing fetus.

Meridional cleavage. When the plane of cytoplasmic cleavage passes through the animal and vegetal pole of the egg.

Morula. A compacted 8- to 16-cell epithelialized embryo with polarized outer cells and non-polar inner cells, which are precursors of the placenta and fetus, respectively.

Parthenogenesis. Preimplantation development without fertilization by a male.

Preimplantation development. Embryonic development between fertilization and implantation of the blastocyst into the wall of the uterus.

Pseudopregnant. A physiological state characterized by uterine receptivity for embryo implantation following copulation with sterile males.

Regulative development. The ability of the early embryo to adjust to, or substitute for, loss of individual cells.

Subcortical maternal complex (SCMC). The SCMC forms during oogenesis and is required for cleavage-stage mouse development.

Syngamy. When male and female haploid pronuclei approximate one another after fertilization. Their membranes interdigitate and breakdown and a metaphase plate forms on which chromosomes congress prior to cell division.

Trophectoderm. Precursor of the placenta; the polar trophectoderm is adjacent to the ICM and the mural trophectoderm lines the blastocoel cavity.

Zona pellucida. An extracellular matrix that surrounds the ovulated egg and dividing embryo prior to hatching at the time of implantation.

Zygote. The 1-cell embryo resulting from fertilization of an ovulated egg by a spermatozoon.

Fig. 1.
Preimplantation mouse development. (A) Oogenesis and early development. Maternal RNA and proteins accumulate within individual oocytes during a ~2 week growth phase, but many are degraded during meiotic maturation and ovulation. The zona pellucida surrounds ...

Maternal-effect genes are transcribed during oogenesis and, by definition, mutant embryonic phenotypes reflect the genotype of the mother rather than that of the offspring. Some maternal-effect genes are expressed only in female gametes, but others are also expressed after activation of the embryonic genome, which complicates differentiating maternal from embryonic effects.

Maternal-effect genes were first described in Drosophila and included dorsal (Nusslein-Volhard et al., 1980), bicoid (Frohnhofer and Nusslein-Volhard, 1986) and torso (Schupbach and Wieschaus, 1986). These early pioneering investigations (St Johnston and Nusslein-Volhard, 1992) were extended to other model organisms (Morisato and Anderson, 1995; Bowerman, 1998; Dosch et al., 2004; Heasman, 2006), but maternal-effect genes were not described in mammals until 2000 (Christians et al., 2000; Tong et al., 2000).

After fertilization, one of the first roles of maternal factors is the processing of the male genome, which is necessary for its participation in embryogenesis. A second role is the removal of maternal detritus (RNA and protein), and a third is the robust activation of the embryonic genome, which is essential for the development of the embryo beyond two cells. A common phenotype among mouse embryos with mutations in maternal-effect genes is arrested progression during cleavage-stage embryogenesis, which indicates that the transcription and translation of embryonic genes is required to replenish depleted (or degraded) maternal stores of factors involved in cyclical biological processes. However, if maternal genes impose epigenetic marks that are stably inherited (e.g. DNA methylation) or modify structures important for development (e.g. maternal sterile mutants), these maternal effects might become manifest only at later developmental stages. Targeted mutagenesis experiments in mice have provided researchers with a wealth of insight into candidate maternal factors that participate in the regulation of these essential early steps of development.

In this review, we discuss the roles of known maternal-effect genes in early mouse development. The genes were initially discovered serendipitously (Christians et al., 2000; Tong et al., 2000) or through homology with those in other model organisms (Burns et al., 2003; Giraldez et al., 2005). However, the more systematic transcriptome profiling of growing oocytes has begun to identify new candidate factors (Hamatani et al., 2004a; Evsikov et al., 2006). In particular, the categorization of downstream targets of oocyte-specific transcription factors has provided a rich source of additional candidate maternal-effect genes (Joshi et al., 2007). More recently, the repertoire of maternal-effect genes has been further expanded to include multi-protein complexes that have crucial roles in mouse preimplantation development (Li et al., 2008a; Zheng and Dean, 2009). Although the current number of maternal-effect genes in mice is modest (Table 1), we believe that this number is likely to increase dramatically in the near future.

Table 1.
Maternal-effect genes in preimplantation development in mice

From egg to embryo

During intraovarian growth, the diameter of mouse oocytes increases from ~10 μm to 80 μm, with a concomitant ~500-fold increase in volume. The maternal genome is transcribed and transcripts accumulate (~100 pg) until oocytes reach a diameter of ~65 μm (De Leon et al., 1983). Most transcripts are translated directly into proteins, many of which have been cataloged in proteomic screens (Latham et al., 1991; Vitale et al., 2007). Some transcripts, however, remain dormant, and become activated later in oogenesis by carefully orchestrated polyadenylation (Racki and Richter, 2006). Within 24 hours of fertilization, male and female pronuclei replicate their DNA in the 1-cell zygote and then their chromosomes congress at syngamy (see Glossary, Box 1) prior to mitosis, cytokinesis and formation of the 2-cell embryo.

Minor activation of the embryonic genome occurs in the male pronucleus of the 1-cell embryo (Nothias et al., 1996), but the two major waves of activation are observed first at the 2-cell stage and then at the 4- to 8-cell transition (Carter et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004; Hamatani et al., 2004a). The second and third embryonic divisions occur at ~12-hour intervals, and the resultant blastomeres appear to be morphologically symmetric. However, prior to the next cell division, the 8-cell embryo undergoes a Ca2+-mediated compaction to form the morula (see Glossary, Box 1; Fig. 1B), in which individual blastomeres greatly increase their area of cell-cell contact (Ziomek and Johnson, 1980). Subsequent asymmetric cell divisions result in two distinct cell populations: ‘inner’ cells that form the embryonic ectoderm/endoderm inner cell mass (ICM); and ‘outer’ cells, which contribute progeny to the trophectoderm, the precursor of the placenta (Fig. 1B) (Tarkowski and Wroblewska, 1967; Johnson and Ziomek, 1981). The establishment of these two cell fates involves homotypic interactions between maternal stores of E-cadherin along the basolateral membranes; this maternal E-cadherin interacts with subcortical elements of the cytoskeleton (De Vries et al., 2004). In contrast to the flattening of these cell-cell contacts, the apical subcortical region remains rich in microvilli, forming a polar domain that persists in outer cells as preimplantation development progresses (Reeve and Ziomek, 1981).

Thus, following compaction, the embryo becomes an epithelialized sphere with distinct polarization of individual blastomeres and two cell populations. The formation of adhesion complexes (adherens, gap and tight junctions) between outer cells enables the directional translocation of ions via basolateral Na+/K+-ATPase into the embryonic interior. The concomitant passage of water forms a fluid-filled blastocoel at the 32-cell stage that defines the early blastocyst (Fig. 1B), and at embryonic day 4.5 (E4.5) the fully formed blastocysts implants into the wall of the uterus (Madan et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2008). Early embryonic development is regulative (see Glossary, Box 1) and cells derived from blastomeres prior to compaction can participate in all tissues of the adult (Tarkowski, 1959; Rossant, 1976). However, such plasticity does not preclude the existence of differences among embryonic cells during early cleavage stages, although there is controversy as to their effects on subsequent embryonic polarity (Rossant and Tam, 2009).

Maternal RNA and protein degradation

During meiotic maturation in the ~12 hours prior to ovulation, mouse oocytes become transcriptionally quiescent and the majority of their polyadenylated RNA disappears (Clegg and Piko, 1983; De Leon et al., 1983) (Fig. 2). Although the mechanisms responsible for this RNA degradation are incompletely understood, small, non-coding RNAs have been implicated in this process (Giraldez et al., 2006). Normally, small RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), are loaded into an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which contains Argonaute proteins. miRNAs or siRNAs then target the RISC to specific mRNAs, which are cleaved or translationally repressed. Loss of maternal DICER (DICER1) (Table 1), an endonuclease that cleaves small RNA precursors into mature miRNAs and siRNAs, impairs the completion of meiosis in mouse oocytes (Murchison et al., 2007; Tang et al., 2007), as does the loss of argonaute 2 (Ago2; Eif2c2), which encodes a catalytically active RNase (Kaneda et al., 2009). Depletion, rather than complete loss of maternal argonaute 2, disrupts gene expression and 2-cell embryos fail to progress to blastocysts (Lykke-Andersen et al., 2008). In a second RNA degradation pathway, a family of CCH tandem zinc-finger proteins has been implicated in destabilizing somatic mRNAs by binding to their 3′ untranslated region (Lai et al., 2000). Genetically altered mice with a truncated form of ZFP36L2 (zinc-finger protein 36, C3H type-like 2) do not progress beyond cleavage-stage embryogenesis, although the mechanism of this block remains unknown (Table 1) (Ramos et al., 2004). These mutations do not completely account for the loss of maternal transcripts and it is thus likely that additional pathways are required for the effective degradation of maternal RNA.

Fig. 2.
Molecular changes initiate development. (A) The onset of mouse development. Transcriptionally inert gametes fuse at fertilization and the entire sperm is incorporated into the cytoplasm. The sperm nucleus is decondensed and repackaged with egg-stored ...

Maternal proteins also are degraded early in development (Fig. 2), some by ubiquitin-proteasome pathways (Suzumori et al., 2003; Roest et al., 2004), others by macroautophagy, which involves a cellular program in which superfluous proteins and organelles are rapidly captured in a double-membrane vesicle (autophagosome) for fusion with lysosomes and subsequent degradation. A complex of ATG12-ATG5-ATG16 proteins decorates the outer surface of the developing autophagosome and is recycled into the cytosol for future use (Xie and Klionsky, 2007; Melendez and Neufeld, 2008). Oocyte-specific conditional mutation of Atg5 has a dramatic effect on early embryogenesis, and Atg5 mutant mouse embryos do not progress beyond the 4- to 8-cell stage of development (Table 1) (Tsukamoto et al., 2008). Presumably, without the degradation of maternal RNA and proteins, embryonic developmental programs cannot be activated. However, this degradation must have some selectivity (Alizadeh et al., 2005; Su et al., 2007) so as to maintain the maternal factors that are required to bridge the interregnum between the maternal and embryonic control of development.

Chromatin remodeling

During gametogenesis, the haploid male and female genomes are packaged with protamines and histones, respectively. After fertilization, the male genome undergoes decondensation and is repackaged with maternal histones, a process that incurs DNA breaks that must be repaired (Derijck et al., 2006). HR6A (official symbol UBE2A, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2A, RAD6 homolog) has been implicated in DNA repair and histone modification, and mice lacking this protein ovulate eggs that can be fertilized but that arrest at the 2-cell stage (Table 1) (Roest et al., 2004). However, the molecular basis for this early block remains to be determined. Although implicated in decondensation of the male pronucleus in Xenopus eggs (Philpott et al., 1991), the absence of nucleoplasmin (encoded by Npm2) does not result in a similar phenotype in mice. Instead, abnormalities in histone acetylation and in heterochromatin formation in oocytes and in early embryos derived from Npm2-null females are associated with decreased fecundity (Table 1) (Burns et al., 2003).

Once packaged with histones, each haploid genome forms a pronucleus and undergoes DNA replication. At this point of development, low levels of transcription are observed, which are higher in the male than in the female pronucleus. The histones that form the male pronucleus are hyperacetylated compared with those associated with the female genome (Adenot et al., 1997), and the male DNA is hypomethylated (Santos et al., 2002). Either of these epigenetic modifications could provide greater access to the genome for activators of transcription in the male pronucleus, although it is not clear whether the presence of the modified histones is causative or reflective of transcription. At syngamy, the male and female pronuclei approximate one another, their nuclear membranes break down, and MTOCs form a barrel-shaped mitotic spindle on which chromosomes congress prior to the first mitotic division (Fig. 2A) (Zamboni et al., 1972; Schatten et al., 1986). Despite early transcription in the 1-cell zygote, little de novo embryonic protein synthesis is observed prior to the 2-cell embryo (Flach et al., 1982; Howlett and Bolton, 1985). Zar1 (zygote arrest 1) encodes an oocyte-specific cytoplasmic protein of unknown function, and its absence in genetically ablated females affects pronuclear syngamy, a process that is crucial for the progression of the embryo beyond the 1-cell stage (Table 1) (Wu et al., 2003). The molecular signals that activate the transcription of specific embryonic genes remain unknown, and only a few factors that have a global effect on gene activation this early on in development have been identified. These include TIF1α (transcription intermediary factor 1, alpha; official symbol TRIM24), which translocates from the cytoplasm to the pronuclei and modulates the first wave of activation of the embryonic genome (Table 1) (Torres-Padilla and Zernicka-Goetz, 2006).

Robust activation of embryonic gene expression requires chromatin remodeling, during which well-defined clusters of proteins use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to restructure or move nucleosome constraints to transcription. Four conserved protein families have been described that have specialized functions in this process (Clapier and Cairns, 2009): SWI/SNF (switching defective/sucrose non-fermenting, first described in yeast); ISWI (imitation switch, first described in Drosophila); CHD (chromodomain, helicase, DNA binding, first described in Xenopus); and INO88 (inositol requiring 80, first described in yeast). Mouse Brg1 (official symbol Smarca4, SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4) encodes a component of the SWI/SNF remodeling complex and is required for full activation of the embryonic genome, without which embryos arrest at the 2- to 4-cell stage (Table 1) (Bultman et al., 2006). BRWD1 (bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1) interacts with BRG1, and, in its absence, oocytes exhibit defects in meiosis and progress poorly beyond pronuclear formation following fertilization (Table 1) (Philipps et al., 2008). It is likely that other remodeling families play essential roles in the activation of the embryonic genome, but conditional oocyte-specific mutations coupled with genome-wide screens to detect affected genes will be required to dissect out their maternal effects in early development.

Embryonic gene activation

After remodeling, the embryonic genome becomes accessible to activation by transcription factors. Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), a master regulator of stress-inducible genes, is highly expressed in mouse oocytes. Although its expression is not limited to oocytes, Hsf1-null females have defects in meiosis (Metchat et al., 2009), and embryos derived from their ovulated eggs arrest, primarily at the 1-cell stage (Table 1) (Christians et al., 2000). Two zinc-finger transcription factors are also required for early embryogenesis. The first is basonuclin 1 (encoded by Bnc1), which is abundant in keratinocytes and germ cells and affects RNA polymerase I- and II-mediated transcription. Its depletion in mouse oocytes is associated with defects in oogenesis, fertilization and cleavage-stage embryogenesis, leading to decreased fecundity (Table 1) (Ma et al., 2006). A second zinc-finger DNA-binding protein, CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), is ubiquitously expressed in mice. It has well-reported roles in genetic and epigenetic regulation (Filippova, 2008), including in X chromosome inactivation in embryonic stem (ES) cells via its interactions with the pluripotency transcription factor OCT4 (POU5F1) (Donohoe et al., 2009). Maternal depletion of CTCF results in widespread defects in meiosis, maternal transcription and preimplantation development (Table 1) (Wan et al., 2008).

Following fertilization, the zygote, derived from two terminally differentiated gametes, is endowed with totipotency through the reprogramming of its DNA. The pluripotency transcription factor OCT4 is expressed during oogenesis and its mRNA persists in 1- and 2-cell embryos. It has recently been reported that depletion of Oct4 mRNA at the 1-cell stage causes embryonic arrest during cleavage-stage development. The data suggest that maternal OCT4 both facilitates zygotic genome activation and enhances maternal RNA degradation, including that of Zar1 and Nobox, two known oocyte-specific transcription factors (Table 1) (Foygel et al., 2008). Another pluripotency transcription factor, SOX2, is also abundantly expressed in oocytes, where it is sequestered in the cytoplasm, presumably to prevent activation of gene targets. Maternal SOX2 translocates to the nucleus of 2-cell embryos, where it remains in the cells of the ICM, but redistributes to the cytoplasm of trophectodermal cells, where, again, it is sequestered from the nucleus. Its embryonic expression is not detected until the morula stage (Fig. 1A), and Sox2-null embryos do not survive past early implantation (Table 1) (Avilion et al., 2003). It seems likely that maternal SOX2 has an effect on the early embryo, which could be investigated in greater detail using conditional mutant mice that lack maternal SOX2.

The subcortical maternal complex

Beyond the effect of individual maternal proteins, a subcortical maternal complex (SCMC) has been described that is essential for embryonic progression past the 2-cell stage (Table 1) (Fig. 3). The founding member of this complex is encoded by Mater (maternal antigen that embryos require; official symbol Nlrp5), which was originally characterized as an antigen associated with a mouse model of autoimmune oophoritis (see Glossary, Box 1) (Tong and Nelson, 1999). Additional members of the complex are encoded by Floped (factor located in oocytes permitting embryonic development; official symbol Ooep) (Pierre et al., 2007; Herr et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008a), Tle6 (transducin-like enhancer of split 6) (Li et al., 2008a) and Filia (RIKEN cDNA 2410004A20) (Ohsugi et al., 2008). The interactions of these proteins, which co-localize in the subcortex as seen by confocal microscopy, have been confirmed by co-expression of Myc- or HA-tagged recombinant proteins in heterologous cell lines and by co-immunoprecipitation (Ohsugi et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008a). Based on its subcortical localization in the oocyte/embryo and on its null phenotype (see below), Padi6 (peptidylarginine deiminase 6) might also encode a protein that participates in the SCMC (Yurttas et al., 2008).

Fig. 3.
Proteins of the subcortical maternal complex (SCMC). (A) MATER is the largest protein in the complex and has a novel 5× N-terminal repeat, a NACHT domain (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) and a 13× leucine-rich repeat that is implicated in protein-protein ...

The absence of MATER, FLOPED, PADI6 or FILIA following genetic ablation in mice does not affect intraovarian follicle formation or germ cell development. Adult male and female Mater- and Floped-null animals appear normal, but the absence of either protein precludes the formation of the SCMC. Male mice are fertile, but females produce no offspring. Ovulated eggs can be fertilized, but embryos progress poorly past the first cell division and perish prior to implantation. This phenotype is not rescued by normal males, and neither Mater nor Floped is expressed from the embryonic genome (Tong et al., 2000; Li et al., 2008a). A similar phenotype is observed in embryos derived from Padi6-null females, which lack the cytoplasmic lattices in eggs that are thought to store maternal ribosomes for the early embryo (Yurttas et al., 2008). In the absence of these lattices, embryos derived from Padi6-null females do not develop significantly past the 2-cell stage (Esposito et al., 2007). Although defects in embryonic transcription are observed in embryos derived from Mater- and Padi6-null females, the severity of the embryonic lethal phenotype makes it difficult to determine whether these metabolic abnormalities are causative or reflective of impending cell death (Table 2).

Table 2.
Null phenotypes of subcortical maternal complex (SCMC) components

Environmental effects

Environmental perturbations also arrest embryogenesis at the 2-cell stage. α-Amanitin is a mushroom toxin that binds to RNA polymerase II and blocks elongation of transcription (Vaisius and Wieland, 1982). Exposure of late 1-cell zygotes to doses of this toxin that inhibit RNA polymerase II (Flach et al., 1982; Vaisius and Wieland, 1982) induce arrest at the 2-cell stage (Warner and Versteegh, 1974). In addition, embryonic cytoplasmic components appear to play a role in making 2-cell embryos competent to complete embryonic cleavage. For example, in vitro development from the 1-cell to the blastocyst stage is restricted in certain inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids (Shire and Whitten, 1980). In some strains, the 1-cell embryo becomes arrested at the 2-cell stage, which has been termed the ‘in vitro 2-cell block’ (Whittingham and Biggers, 1967). This block can be surmounted by injecting small amounts of cytoplasm from embryos that do not exhibit this block (Muggleton-Harris et al., 1982). This rescue occurs independently of the presence of maternal chromosomes, indicating the importance of stored, rather than newly synthesized, components (Zanoni et al., 2009). It has been suggested that in some types of clinical infertility, the transfer of donor ooplasm into human eggs might permit successful embryonic development (Cohen et al., 1997). However, the specific maternally provided cytoplasmic proteins that control embryonic development have not been identified. The in vitro 2-cell block in mice can also be circumvented by modifications to the culture conditions (Lawitts and Biggers, 1993), which has implications for human in vitro fertilization, in which embryos are cultured prior to transfer to recipients.

Most maternal effects are observed early in mouse development, which reflects the rapid degradation of the encoded products in the absence of compensatory expression from the inactive embryonic genome. Although progress has been made, there remains a significant shortfall in the number of maternal-effect genes that have been identified and characterized (Table 1) and a gap in our knowledge of the transcriptome of mouse oocytes (Hamatani et al., 2004b; Evsikov et al., 2006). It is likely that the combined approaches of biochemistry, cell biology and more sophisticated genetics will help to define the interactions of these maternal proteins to provide a more inclusive picture of the regulatory networks that initiate the onset of mouse development.

Beyond two-cell embryogenesis

After activation of the embryonic genome, stored maternal factors play a smaller role in preimplantation development and a surprising number of degraded maternal proteins are replaced immediately by newly synthesized embryonic gene products (Hamatani et al., 2004a; Evsikov et al., 2006). However, the phenotype of mutations in some maternal-effect genes only becomes manifest later in development, including those genes required to impose epigenetic marks that are inherited by the progeny of early embryonic cells.

DNA methylation patterns

The haploid genomes of egg and sperm are methylated during gametogenesis. However, within hours of fertilization, the male pronucleus is actively demethylated, whereas female genes are passively demethylated during rounds of semiconservative DNA replication in the early embryo (Fig. 2). By the blastocyst stage, the bulk of embryonic DNA has been demethylated, except for the differentially methylated imprinting control regions (ICRs; see Glossary, Box 1) (Reik et al., 2001; Santos et al., 2002). Both a male and a female haploid genome are needed for successful embryogenesis, and parthenogenetically activated eggs do not progress beyond the blastocyst (McGrath and Solter, 1984; Barton et al., 1984). The major barrier to parthenogenesis (see Glossary, Box 1) appears to be the monoallelic expression that results from epigenetic modifications (primarily DNA methylation) of imprinted genes (Kono et al., 2004). To date, ~130 imprinted genes have been identified (http://www.har.mrc.ac.uk/research/genomic_imprinting). Those with monoallelic male expression would not be available to parthenotes.

Although epigenetic modifications to sperm chromatin may contribute to embryonic development (Hammoud et al., 2009), maternal factors have been proven to play crucial roles in regulating epigenetic marks. For example, during oogenesis de novo DNA methylation is accomplished by DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) (Table 1) (Okano et al., 1999; Kaneda et al., 2004), which forms a complex with the enzymatically inactive co-factor DNA cytosine-5-methyltransferase 3-like (DNMT3L) (Table 1) (Bourc'his et al., 2001). This complex is targeted by DNMT3L to the N-terminal tail of histone H3 (Kaneda et al., 2004), and the methylase modifies adjacent DNA to establish imprinted loci. The tethering of DNMT3A-DNMT3L to the tail of histone H3 depends on the methylation status of lysine 4 on this histone (H3K4) and is required for the de novo DNA methylation of differentially methylated regions (Ooi et al., 2007; Ciccone et al., 2009).

Maternal factors also maintain DNA imprints during preimplantation development, a process that is complicated by ongoing passive demethylation associated with the semiconservative DNA replication noted above. DNA methyltransferase (cytosine-5) 1 (DNMT1), which has oocyte- and somatic-specific isoforms, is both necessary and sufficient to ensure monoallelic expression of imprinted genes (Table 1) (Hirasawa et al., 2008). Stella (Dppa3, developmental pluripotency-associated 3) is an oocyte-specific maternal-effect gene that is required for early development (Table 1) (Payer et al., 2003; Bortvin et al., 2004). STELLA binds to Ran-binding protein 5 (RanBP5; importin 5, IPO5) and is transported into the nucleus, where it maintains methylation marks on most of the maternal genome (Table 1) (Nakamura et al., 2007). Another maternal-effect gene, Zfp57 (zinc-finger protein 57), is not only required for the establishment of germline methylation, but also plays a broad role in maintaining maternal and paternal methylation patterns in early embryos (Table 1) (Li et al., 2008b).

Protein-enriched cell cortex

The subcortex of the egg and early dividing embryo contains a plethora of proteins important for early development. For example, maternal E-cadherin (encoded by Cdh1) is present in the cortex and is required for the adherence of early blastomeres. However, if the proximity of the blastomeres is assured by the zona pellucida, the dividing embryo can survive the absence of maternal E-cadherin and can undergo normal compaction at the morula stage because of the embryonic expression of paternal Cdh1 (De Vries et al., 2004). As noted above, the absence of MATER or FLOPED prevents the formation of the SCMC (Table 2), another subcortical complex, and embryos do not progress beyond cleavage-stage embryogenesis (Li et al., 2008a). Although FILIA also participates in the SCMC, its absence in genetically ablated mice has a less catastrophic phenotype (Table 2). Importantly, the absence of FILIA does not preclude the subcortical localization of other components of the SCMC, and Filia-null female mice have a ~50% decrease in fecundity rather than sterility. Ovulated eggs from Filia-null mice are fertilized, but cell cycle progression is delayed by 6-8 hours during cleavage-stage embryogenesis. This more subtle phenotype provides mechanistic insight into the role of the SCMC in ensuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation during preimplantation mouse development. A relatively high rate of aneuploidy in embryos derived from Filia-null females implicates FILIA (and, by extension, the SCMC) in normal spindle formation via a RHOA signaling pathway and in maintaining the integrity of the spindle assembly checkpoint (Zheng and Dean, 2009).

Other maternal proteins become geographically polarized during preimplantation development, some as early as the 2-cell stage, such as T-cell leukemia/lymphoma 1 (TCL1) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1). TCL1 shuttles between the cortex and nucleus in a cell cycle-dependent manner, and embryos derived from Tcl1-null females have delayed cleavage-stage progression with decreased fecundity (Table 1) (Narducci et al., 2002). TCL1 heterodimerizes with AKT (thymoma viral proto-oncogene 1, AKT1; also known as protein kinase B, PKB), a serine/threonine kinase implicated in cell growth. Rather than activating AKT by phosphorylation, TCL1 promotes blastomere proliferation by translocating AKT to the nucleus of early blastomeres, although the targets of the kinase remain unknown (Fiorenza et al., 2008). UCHL1, which participates in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for protein degradation, is also expressed during oogenesis. It has a subcortical location and is excluded from cell-cell contacts, as occurs with the SCMC. Decreased fecundity is observed in mice lacking UCHL1, which might be partly due to increased rates of polyspermy, the basis of which remains unknown (Table 1) (Sekiguchi et al., 2006). Whether or not these proteins directly participate in the SCMC remains to be determined.

These results emphasize the participation of maternal proteins in maintaining the epigenetic marks that are necessary to prevent embryonic lethality and that are required to foster the progressive transition from maternal to embryonic control of development. The increasingly detailed characterization of interacting proteins in the subcortex and of the ability of components to shuttle to the nucleus might provide insight into protein networks, some of which might ensure the pluripotency of embryonic blastomeres.

Establishing embryonic cell lineages

Although gene products expressed after fertilization are key in establishing initial embryonic cell lineages (Rossant and Tam, 2009; Zernicka-Goetz et al., 2009), maternal factors may also play a role in this process. The 1-cell embryo normally divides into two totipotent blastomeres. These cells then divide sequentially, either parallel (meridional) or orthogonal (equatorial) to the initial cleavage plane of the 2-cell embryo (see Glossary, Box 1; Fig. 4). If parallel-oriented division occurs, the 4-cell embryo establishes a planar structure (~20%), whereas if orthogonal division occurs (~80%), a tetrahedron results (see Fig. 4) (Gardner, 2002). When the cleavage of the first dividing blastomere is meridional and the second is equatorial (or vice versa), the progeny of the early dividing blastomere will preferentially contribute to the embryonic axis of the blastocyst (Piotrowska-Nitsche et al., 2005). The vegetal blastomere that lies beneath the other three cells in the tetrahedron has an altered epigenetic mark on histone H3 (H3R26me) (Torres-Padilla et al., 2007), as well as increased levels of Cdx2 mRNA (Jedrusik et al., 2008), which might contribute to a trophectodermal cell fate (Bischoff et al., 2008). The diminished level of cell-cell contact of the vegetal blastomere, coupled with the exclusion of the SCMC from such regions (see below), predicts a greater occupancy of the cortex by the SCMC, but its role in initial cell lineage establishment remains to be determined.

Fig. 4.
Initial embryonic cleavages. (A,B) The first cleavage of the fertilized egg forms the symmetric 2-cell embryo, in which each blastomere (orange and red) remains totipotent. (C) The second embryonic cleavage occurs sequentially and can either be parallel ...

After compaction and formation of the morula, the SCMC segregates to the outer cells of the morula and blastocyst, where the complex is asymmetrically restricted to the apical cortex of the outer cells (Fig. 5B). The exclusion of the SCMC from cell-cell contact is reversed when blastomeres are separated (Ohsugi et al., 2008; Herr et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008a), which indicates that a dynamic equilibrium exists between a cytoplasmic pool of preassembled complex (or components of it) and the subcortical complex (Fig. 5). Cell division non-parallel to the apicobasal axis of the polarized blastomeres results in cell populations that are marked by the presence or absence of the SCMC. These observations are consistent with a model in which the early embryo differentially accumulates a maternally expressed protein complex in topologically distinct blastomeres. The progeny of those outer cells that contain the SCMC are known to preferentially form the trophectoderm, whereas those without the complex preferentially become the ICM of the blastocyst. One could envision a role for the SCMC in sequestering macromolecules that eventually trigger, either directly or indirectly, a commitment of the outer cell progeny to becoming trophoblasts (Johnson and McConnell, 2004). The localization of Cdx2 transcripts in the periphery of outer cells (Jedrusik et al., 2008) and the observation that FLOPED binds to ribonucleotide homopolymers (Herr et al., 2008) are consistent with the complex having a role in sequestering RNA in outer cells to influence the subsequent pathways that direct cells into trophectoderm or ICM lineages.

Fig. 5.
Localization of the SCMC in the early mouse embryo. (A) Exclusion from cell-cell contacts. Zona-pellucida-free 2-cell mouse embryos incubated in the presence (+) or absence (−) of calcium, and fixed, permeabilized and stained with antibodies to ...

In theory, initial cell lineages (trophectoderm versus ICM) could be set at the 2-cell stage, but by deferring this dichotomous fate choice until eight cells, the risk of embryonic lethality from the loss or damage of a single cell is substantially reduced. However, this requires pluripotency to be maintained in all cells during the first three cell divisions and for compensatory mechanisms to exist for the loss of a single blastomere. Following asymmetric cell division at the 8-cell stage, the absence of the SCMC in the inner cells may initiate developmental lineage decisions in the ICM. This formulation is consistent with models in which cell fate is determined by cleavage pattern and by the positions of blastomeres (or by the molecular determinants in them) in the embryo (Tarkowski and Wroblewska, 1967; Johnson and McConnell, 2004; Zernicka-Goetz et al., 2009). The ability of the SCMC to redistribute during cleavage-stage embryogenesis (Ohsugi et al., 2008; Herr et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008a) may play an important role in the regulative nature of early mammalian development, in which ablation of individual blastomeres need not prevent normal development (Tarkowski, 1959; Tsunoda and McLaren, 1983). The observation that some inner cells become outer cells with trophectoderm descendents after incubation with morulae (Ziomek and Johnson, 1982) might reflect the restoration of the SCMC (from cytoplasmic stores) in the absence of cell-cell contact, as observed after immunosurgery (Ohsugi et al., 2008). Alternatively, the complex might participate in maintaining the pluripotency of cleavage-stage blastomeres.

Other proteins expressed by the embryonic genome, including ezrin and the partitioning defective protein 3 (PAR3, also known as PARD3)-atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) complex, do not become geographically polarized until later in preimplantation development. Ezrin, a member of the ERM (Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin) family of proteins (Sato et al., 1992), has been reported to be an early marker of blastomere polarization and of trophoblast precursor cells (Louvet et al., 1996). Ezrin is widely expressed in the adult mouse, in which it localizes to the apical cortex of epithelial cells (Berryman et al., 1993). Although not essential for development (Saotome et al., 2004), ezrin, derived from maternal and embryonic transcripts, remains symmetrically present at the periphery of blastomeres until the 8-cell stage, when it becomes confined to the apical cytocortex. The PAR3-aPKC complex is also asymmetrically located in the 8-cell embryo, and the experimental disruption of either protein in individual blastomeres in vitro at the 4-cell stage partially redirects their cell fate towards that of an inner cell after the fourth embryonic cleavage (Plusa et al., 2005). Whether these aforementioned proteins interact with the SCMC beginning at the 8-cell stage of development has not been ascertained.


Following fertilization, successful preimplantation development depends on: the degradation of maternal detritus; the activation of the embryonic genome; cell cycle progression that is orchestrated to ensure the proper allocation of initial cell lineages; and the formation of a blastocyst that implants on the uterine wall. The molecular basis of these physiological processes is heavily dependent on components that are stored in the oocyte and encoded by maternal-effect genes.

Compared with other model organisms, relatively few maternal-effect genes (fewer than 30) have been investigated in mice since the first two were described in 2000. Thus, there continues to be major gaps in our knowledge of what are very fundamental developmental processes, concerning, for example: selectivity in the initial turnover of maternal RNA and proteins; the chromatin reprogramming that is required to restore totipotency in terminally differentiated gametes; the activation of the embryonic genome; the initiation of embryonic cell division; the compaction to form the morula; and the plasticity of genetic programs and how they might relate to the regulative nature of early development. However, a more complete cataloguing of the egg transcriptome and proteome, as well as the advent of the genome-wide analysis of epigenetic marks, transcription factor regulatory networks and small RNAs promises future advances in understanding these events of early development.

Mouse transgenesis continues to play an important role in identifying the genes that are essential for normal development. The most accessible maternal-effect genes are those that are oocyte, or at least gamete, specific, because genetic ablation provides phenotypes that offer insight into their function in embryos derived from homozygous null mothers. More challenging to study are those genes that are expressed both maternally and in the zygote. However, the creation of conditional mutants should make these genetic circuitries more amenable to investigation and should dramatically broaden our understanding of early development. Heterozygous mutants might also provide a useful means of studying the molecular interactions of genetic networks that might be more subtly perturbed and thus do not produce overt phenotypes that arrest development.

The initial cohort of maternal-effect genes that has been studied to date has been used to identify binding partners and to investigate other potential participants in specific developmental signaling and metabolic pathways. In addition, recently described oocyte-specific transcription factors offer powerful tools for use in mouse genetics, particularly when coupled with genome-wide screens to identify potential downstream maternal-effect genes. Investigating such genes in mice could afford new mechanistic insights into the reprogramming of terminally differentiated cells into pluripotent embryonic cells, with possible therapeutic implications for treating human disorders such as diabetes, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. The genetic ablation of individual, or groups of, maternal-effect genes might also provide useful models for investigating abnormal human physiology that can affect early development and reproduction.


We appreciate the critical review of the manuscript by Dr Scott Coonrod and the expert insight provided during the review process. The authors are funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, NIDDK. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.


Competing interests statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.


  • Adenot P. G., Mercier Y., Renard J. P., Thompson E. M. (1997). Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. aDevelopment 124, 4615-4625 [PubMed]
  • Alizadeh Z., Kageyama S., Aoki F. (2005). Degradation of maternal mRNA in mouse embryos: selective degradation of specific mRNAs after fertilization. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 72, 281-290 [PubMed]
  • Avilion A. A., Nicolis S. K., Pevny L. H., Perez L., Vivian N., Lovell-Badge R. (2003). Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev. 17, 126-140 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Barton S. C., Surani M. A., Norris M. L. (1984). Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature 311, 374-376 [PubMed]
  • Berryman M., Franck Z., Bretscher A. (1993). Ezrin is concentrated in the apical microvilli of a wide variety of epithelial cells whereas moesin is found primarily in endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 105, 1025-1043 [PubMed]
  • Bischoff M., Parfitt D. E., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2008). Formation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the mouse blastocyst: relationships between orientation of early cleavage divisions and pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions. Development 135, 953-962 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bortvin A., Goodheart M., Liao M., Page D. C. (2004). Dppa3/Pgc7/stella is a maternal factor and is not required for germ cell specification in mice. BMC Dev. Biol. 4, 2 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bourc'his D., Xu G. L., Lin C. S., Bollman B., Bestor T. H. (2001). Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 294, 2536-2539 [PubMed]
  • Bowerman B. (1998). Maternal control of pattern formation in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 39, 73-117 [PubMed]
  • Bultman S. J., Gebuhr T. C., Pan H., Svoboda P., Schultz R. M., Magnuson T. (2006). Maternal BRG1 regulates zygotic genome activation in the mouse. Genes Dev. 20, 1744-1754 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Burns K. H., Viveiros M. M., Ren Y., Wang P., DeMayo F. J., Frail D. E., Eppig J. J., Matzuk M. M. (2003). Roles of NPM2 in chromatin and nucleolar organization in oocytes and embryos. Science 300, 633-636 [PubMed]
  • Carter M. G., Hamatani T., Sharov A. A., Carmack C. E., Qian Y., Aiba K., Ko N. T., Dudekula D. B., Brzoska P. M., Hwang S. S., et al. (2003). In situ-synthesized novel microarray optimized for mouse stem cell and early developmental expression profiling. Genome Res. 13, 1011-1021 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Christians E., Davis A. A., Thomas S. D., Benjamin I. J. (2000). Maternal effect of hsf1 on reproductive success. Nature 407, 693-694 [PubMed]
  • Ciccone D. N., Su H., Hevi S., Gay F., Lei H., Bajko J., Xu G., Li E., Chen T. (2009). KDM1B is a histone H3K4 demethylase required to establish maternal genomic imprints. Nature 461, 415-418 [PubMed]
  • Clapier C. R., Cairns B. R. (2009). The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 273-304 [PubMed]
  • Clegg K. B., Piko L. (1983). Poly(A) length, cytoplasmic adenylation and synthesis of poly(A)+ RNA in early mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 95, 331-341 [PubMed]
  • Cohen J., Scott R., Schimmel T., Levron J., Willadsen S. (1997). Birth of infant after transfer of anucleate donor oocyte cytoplasm into recipient eggs. Lancet 350, 186-187 [PubMed]
  • De Leon V., Johnson A., Bachvarova R. (1983). Half-lives and relative amounts of stored and polysomal ribosomes and poly(A)+ RNA in mouse oocytes. Dev. Biol. 98, 400-408 [PubMed]
  • De Vries W. N., Evsikov A. V., Haac B. E., Fancher K. S., Holbrook A. E., Kemler R., Solter D., Knowles B. B. (2004). Maternal beta-catenin and E-cadherin in mouse development. Development 131, 4435-4445 [PubMed]
  • Derijck A. A., van der Heijden G. W., Giele M., Philippens M. E., van Bavel C. C., de Boer P. (2006). gammaH2AX signalling during sperm chromatin remodelling in the mouse zygote. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5, 959-971 [PubMed]
  • Donohoe M. E., Silva S. S., Pinter S. F., Xu N., Lee J. T. (2009). The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting. Nature 460, 128-132 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dosch R., Wagner D. S., Mintzer K. A., Runke G., Wiemelt A. P., Mullins M. C. (2004). Maternal control of vertebrate development before the midblastula transition: mutants from the zebrafish I. Dev. Cell 6, 771-780 [PubMed]
  • Esposito G., Vitale A. M., Leijten F. P., Strik A. M., Koonen-Reemst A. M., Yurttas P., Robben T. J., Coonrod S., Gossen J. A. (2007). Peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) 6 is essential for oocyte cytoskeletal sheet formation and female fertility. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 273, 25-31 [PubMed]
  • Evsikov A. V., Graber J. H., Brockman J. M., Hampl A., Holbrook A. E., Singh P., Eppig J. J., Solter D., Knowles B. B. (2006). Cracking the egg: molecular dynamics and evolutionary aspects of the transition from the fully grown oocyte to embryo. Genes Dev. 20, 2713-2727 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Filippova G. N. (2008). Genetics and epigenetics of the multifunctional protein CTCF. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 80, 337-360 [PubMed]
  • Fiorenza M. T., Torcia S., Canterini S., Bevilacqua A., Narducci M. G., Ragone G., Croce C. M., Russo G., Mangia F. (2008). TCL1 promotes blastomere proliferation through nuclear transfer, but not direct phosphorylation, of AKT/PKB in early mouse embryos. Cell Death Differ. 15, 420-422 [PubMed]
  • Flach G., Johnson M. H., Braude P., Taylor R. A. S., Bolton V. N. (1982). The transition from maternal to embryonic control in the 2-cell mouse embryo. EMBO J. 1, 681-686 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Foygel K., Choi B., Jun S., Leong D. E., Lee A., Wong C. C., Zuo E., Eckart M., Reijo Pera R. A., Wong W. H., et al. (2008). A novel and critical role for Oct4 as a regulator of the maternal-embryonic transition. PLoS One 3, e4109 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Frohnhofer H. G., Nusslein-Volhard C. (1986). Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid. Nature 324, 120-125
  • Gardner R. L. (2002). Experimental analysis of second cleavage in the mouse. Hum. Reprod. 17, 3178-3189 [PubMed]
  • Giraldez A. J., Cinalli R. M., Glasner M. E., Enright A. J., Thomson J. M., Baskerville S., Hammond S. M., Bartel D. P., Schier A. F. (2005). MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science 308, 833-838 [PubMed]
  • Giraldez A. J., Mishima Y., Rihel J., Grocock R. J., Van D. S., Inoue K., Enright A. J., Schier A. F. (2006). Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science 312, 75-79 [PubMed]
  • Hamatani T., Carter M. G., Sharov A. A., Ko M. S. (2004a). Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse preimplantation development. Dev. Cell 6, 117-131 [PubMed]
  • Hamatani T., Falco G., Carter M. G., Akutsu H., Stagg C. A., Sharov A. A., Dudekula D. B., VanBuren V., Ko M. S. (2004b). Age-associated alteration of gene expression patterns in mouse oocytes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 2263-2278 [PubMed]
  • Hammoud S. S., Nix D. A., Zhang H., Purwar J., Carrell D. T., Cairns B. R. (2009). Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460, 473-478 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Heasman J. (2006). Maternal determinants of embryonic cell fate. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 93-98 [PubMed]
  • Herr J. C., Chertihin O., Digilio L., Jha K. N., Vemuganti S., Flickinger C. J. (2008). Distribution of RNA binding protein MOEP19 in the oocyte cortex and early embryo indicates pre-patterning related to blastomere polarity and trophectoderm specification. Dev. Biol. 314, 300-316 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hirasawa R., Chiba H., Kaneda M., Tajima S., Li E., Jaenisch R., Sasaki H. (2008). Maternal and zygotic Dnmt1 are necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of DNA methylation imprints during preimplantation development. Genes Dev. 22, 1607-1616 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Howell C. Y., Bestor T. H., Ding F., Latham K. E., Mertineit C., Trasler J. M., Chaillet J. R. (2001). Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmt1 gene. Cell 104, 829-838 [PubMed]
  • Howlett S. K., Bolton V. N. (1985). Sequence and regulation of morphological and molecular events during the first cell cycle of mouse embryogenesis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 87, 175-206 [PubMed]
  • Jedrusik A., Parfitt D. E., Guo G., Skamagki M., Grabarek J. B., Johnson M. H., Robson P., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2008). Role of Cdx2 and cell polarity in cell allocation and specification of trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 22, 2692-2706 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Johnson M. H., Ziomek C. A. (1981). The foundation of two distinct cell lineages within the mouse morula. Cell 24, 71-80 [PubMed]
  • Johnson M. H., McConnell J. M. (2004). Lineage allocation and cell polarity during mouse embryogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 583-597 [PubMed]
  • Joshi S., Davies H., Sims L. P., Levy S. E., Dean J. (2007). Ovarian gene expression in the absence of FIGLA, an oocyte-specific transcription factor. BMC Dev. Biol. bold>7, 67 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaneda M., Okano M., Hata K., Sado T., Tsujimoto N., Li E., Sasaki H. (2004). Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature 429, 900-903 [PubMed]
  • Kaneda M., Tang F., O'Carroll D., Lao K., Surani M. A. (2009). Essential role for Argonaute2 protein in mouse oogenesis. Epigenetics Chromatin 2, 9 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kono T., Obata Y., Wu Q., Niwa K., Ono Y., Yamamoto Y., Park E. S., Seo J. S., Ogawa H. (2004). Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 428, 860-864 [PubMed]
  • Lai W. S., Carballo E., Thorn J. M., Kennington E. A., Blackshear P. J. (2000). Interactions of CCCH zinc finger proteins with mRNA. Binding of tristetraprolin-related zinc finger proteins to Au-rich elements and destabilization of mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17827-17837 [PubMed]
  • Latham K. E., Garrels J. I., Chang C., Solter D. (1991). Quantitative analysis of protein synthesis in mouse embryos. I. Extensive reprogramming at the one- and two-cell stages. Development 112, 921-932 [PubMed]
  • Lawitts J. A., Biggers J. D. (1993). Culture of preimplantation embryos. Methods Enzymol. 225, 153-164 [PubMed]
  • Li L., Baibakov B., Dean J. (2008a). A subcortical maternal complex essential for pre-implantation mouse embryogenesis. Dev. Cell 15, 416-425 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li X., Ito M., Zhou F., Youngson N., Zuo X., Leder P., Ferguson-Smith A. C. (2008b). A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev. Cell 15, 547-557 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Louvet S., Aghion J., Santa-Maria A., Mangeat P., Maro B. (1996). Ezrin becomes restricted to outer cells following asymmetrical division in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 177, 568-579 [PubMed]
  • Lykke-Andersen K., Gilchrist M. J., Grabarek J. B., Das P., Miska E., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2008). Maternal Argonaute 2 is essential for early mouse development at the maternal-zygotic transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4383-4392 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ma J., Zeng F., Schultz R. M., Tseng H. (2006). Basonuclin: a novel mammalian maternal-effect gene. Development 133, 2053-2062 [PubMed]
  • Madan P., Rose K., Watson A. J. (2007). Na/K-ATPase beta1 subunit expression is required for blastocyst formation and normal assembly of trophectoderm tight junction-associated proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12127-12134 [PubMed]
  • McGrath J., Solter D. (1984). Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37, 179-183 [PubMed]
  • Melendez A., Neufeld T. P. (2008). The cell biology of autophagy in metazoans: a developing story. Development 135, 2347-2360 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Merz E. A., Brinster R. L., Brunner S., Chen H. Y. (1981). Protein degradation during preimplantation development of the mouse. J. Reprod. Fertil. 61, 415-418 [PubMed]
  • Metchat A., Akerfelt M., Bierkamp C., Delsinne V., Sistonen L., Alexandre H., Christians E. S. (2009). Mammalian heat shock factor 1 Is essential for oocyte meiosis and directly regulates Hsp90(alpha) expression. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 9521-9528 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Morisato D., Anderson K. V. (1995). Signaling pathways that establish the dorsal-ventral pattern of the Drosophila embryo. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29, 371-399 [PubMed]
  • Muggleton-Harris A., Whittingham D. G., Wilson L. (1982). Cytoplasmic control of preimplantation development in vitro in the mouse. Nature 299, 460-462 [PubMed]
  • Murchison E. P., Stein P., Xuan Z., Pan H., Zhang M. Q., Schultz R. M., Hannon G. J. (2007). Critical roles for Dicer in the female germline. Genes Dev. 21, 682-693 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nakamura T., Arai Y., Umehara H., Masuhara M., Kimura T., Taniguchi H., Sekimoto T., Ikawa M., Yoneda Y., Okabe M., et al. (2007). PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 64-71 [PubMed]
  • Narducci M. G., Fiorenza M. T., Kang S. M., Bevilacqua A., Di G. M., Remotti D., Picchio M. C., Fidanza V., Cooper M. D., Croce C. M., et al. (2002). TCL1 participates in early embryonic development and is overexpressed in human seminomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11712-11717 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nothias J. Y., Miranda M., DePamphilis M. L. (1996). Uncoupling of transcription and translation during zygotic gene activation in the mouse. EMBO J. 15, 5715-5725 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nusslein-Volhard C., Lohs-Schardin M., Sander K., Cremer C. (1980). A dorso-ventral shift of embryonic primordia in a new maternal-effect mutant of Drosophila. Nature 283, 474-476 [PubMed]
  • Ohsugi M., Zheng P., Baibakov B., Li L., Dean J. (2008). Maternally derived FILIA-MATER complex localizes asymmetrically in cleavage-stage mouse embryos. Development 135, 259-269 [PubMed]
  • Okano M., Bell D. W., Haber D. A., Li E. (1999). DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99, 247-257 [PubMed]
  • Ooi S. K., Qiu C., Bernstein E., Li K., Jia D., Yang Z., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Lin S. P., Allis C. D., et al. (2007). DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature 448, 714-717 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Payer B., Saitou M., Barton S. C., Thresher R., Dixon J. P., Zahn D., Colledge W. H., Carlton M. B., Nakano T., Surani M. A. (2003). Stella is a maternal effect gene required for normal early development in mice. Curr. Biol. 13, 2110-2117 [PubMed]
  • Philipps D. L., Wigglesworth K., Hartford S. A., Sun F., Pattabiraman S., Schimenti K., Handel M., Eppig J. J., Schimenti J. C. (2008). The dual bromodomain and WD repeat-containing mouse protein BRWD1 is required for normal spermiogenesis and the oocyte-embryo transition. Dev. Biol. 317, 72-82 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Philpott A., Leno G. H., Laskey R. A. (1991). Sperm decondensation in Xenopus egg cytoplasm is mediated by nucleoplasmin. Cell 65, 569-578 [PubMed]
  • Pierre A., Gautier M., Callebaut I., Bontoux M., Jeanpierre E., Pontarotti P., Monget P. (2007). Atypical structure and phylogenomic evolution of the new eutherian oocyte- and embryo-expressed KHDC1/DPPA5/ECAT1/OOEP gene family. Genomics 90, 583-594 [PubMed]
  • Piotrowska-Nitsche K., Perea-Gomez A., Haraguchi S., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2005). Four-cell stage mouse blastomeres have different developmental properties. Development 132, 479-490 [PubMed]
  • Plusa B., Frankenberg S., Chalmers A., Hadjantonakis A. K., Moore C. A., Papalopulu N., Papaioannou V. E., Glover D. M., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2005). Downregulation of Par3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J. Cell Sci. 118, 505-515 [PubMed]
  • Racki W. J., Richter J. D. (2006). CPEB controls oocyte growth and follicle development in the mouse. Development 133, 4527-4537 [PubMed]
  • Ramos S. B. V., Stumpo D. J., Kennington E. A., Phillips R. S., Bock C. B., Ribeiro-Neto F., Blackshear P. J. (2004). The CCCH tandem zinc-finger protein Zfp36I2 is crucial for female fertility and early embryonic development. Development 131, 4883-4893 [PubMed]
  • Reeve W. J., Ziomek C. A. (1981). Distribution of microvilli on dissociated blastomeres from mouse embryos: evidence for surface polarization at compaction. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 62, 339-350 [PubMed]
  • Reik W., Dean W., Walter J. (2001). Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 293, 1089-1093 [PubMed]
  • Roest H. P., Baarends W. M., de Wit J., van Klaveren J. W., Wassenaar E., Hoogerbrugge J. W., van Cappellen W. A., Hoeijmakers J. H., Grootegoed J. A. (2004). The ubiquitin-conjugating DNA repair enzyme HR6A is a maternal factor essential for early embryonic development in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5485-5495 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rossant J. (1976). Postimplantation development of blastomeres isolated from 4- and 8-cell mouse eggs. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 36, 283-290 [PubMed]
  • Rossant J., Tam P. P. (2009). Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse. Development 136, 701-713 [PubMed]
  • Santos F., Hendrich B., Reik W., Dean W. (2002). Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 241, 172-182 [PubMed]
  • Saotome I., Curto M., McClatchey A. I. (2004). Ezrin is essential for epithelial organization and villus morphogenesis in the developing intestine. Dev. Cell 6, 855-864 [PubMed]
  • Sato N., Funayama N., Nagafuchi A., Yonemura S., Tsukita S., Tsukita S. (1992). A gene family consisting of ezrin, radixin and moesin. Its specific localization at actin filament/plasma membrane association sites. J. Cell Sci. 103, 131-143 [PubMed]
  • Saunders C. M., Larman M. G., Parrington J., Cox L. J., Royse J., Blayney L. M., Swann K., Lai F. A. (2002). PLC zeta: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca(2+) oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development 129, 3533-3544 [PubMed]
  • Schatten G., Simerly C., Schatten H. (1985). Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4152-4156 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schatten H., Schatten G., Mazia D., Balczon R., Simerly C. (1986). Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 105-109 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schupbach T., Wieschaus E. (1986). Germline autonomy of maternal-effect mutations altering the embryonic body pattern of Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 113, 443-448 [PubMed]
  • Sekiguchi S., Kwon J., Yoshida E., Hamasaki H., Ichinose S., Hideshima M., Kuraoka M., Takahashi A., Ishii Y., Kyuwa S., et al. (2006). Localization of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in mouse ova and its function in the plasma membrane to block polyspermy. Am. J. Pathol. 169, 1722-1729 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shire J. G., Whitten W. K. (1980). Genetic variation in the timing of first cleavage in mice: effect of maternal genotype. Biol. Reprod. 23, 369-376 [PubMed]
  • Shitara H., Hayashi J. I., Takahama S., Kaneda H., Yonekawa H. (1998). Maternal inheritance of mouse mtDNA in interspecific hybrids: segregation of the leaked paternal mtDNA followed by the prevention of subsequent paternal leakage. Genetics 148, 851-857 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • St Johnston D., Nusslein-Volhard C. (1992). The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 68, 201-219 [PubMed]
  • Su Y. Q., Sugiura K., Woo Y., Wigglesworth K., Kamdar S., Affourtit J., Eppig J. J. (2007). Selective degradation of transcripts during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev. Biol. 302, 104-117 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sutovsky P., Schatten G. (2000). Paternal contributions to the mammalian zygote: fertilization after sperm-egg fusion. Int. Rev. Cytol. 195, 1-65 [PubMed]
  • Suzumori N., Burns K. H., Yan W., Matzuk M. M. (2003). RFPL4 interacts with oocyte proteins of the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 550-555 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tang F., Kaneda M., O'Carroll D., Hajkova P., Barton S. C., Sun Y. A., Lee C., Tarakhovsky A., Lao K., Surani M. A. (2007). Maternal microRNAs are essential for mouse zygotic development. Genes Dev. 21, 644-648 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tarkowski A. K. (1959). Experiments on the development of isolated blastomers of mouse eggs. Nature 184, 1286-1287 [PubMed]
  • Tarkowski A. K., Wroblewska J. (1967). Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4- and 8-cell stage. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 18, 155-180 [PubMed]
  • Tong Z.-B., Nelson L. M. (1999). A mouse gene encoding an oocyte antigen associated with autoimmune premature ovarian failure. Endocrinology 140, 3720-3726 [PubMed]
  • Tong Z. B., Gold L., Pfeifer K. E., Dorward H., Lee E., Bondy C. A., Dean J., Nelson L. M. (2000). Mater, a maternal effect gene required for early embryonic development in mice. Nat. Genet. 26, 267-268 [PubMed]
  • Torres-Padilla M. E., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2006). Role of TIF1alpha as a modulator of embryonic transcription in the mouse zygote. J. Cell Biol. 174, 329-338 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Torres-Padilla M. E., Parfitt D. E., Kouzarides T., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2007). Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo. Nature 445, 214-218 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tsukamoto S., Kuma A., Murakami M., Kishi C., Yamamoto A., Mizushima N. (2008). Autophagy is essential for preimplantation development of mouse embryos. Science 321, 117-120 [PubMed]
  • Tsunoda Y., McLaren A. (1983). Effect of various procedures on the viability of mouse embryos containing half the normal number of blastomeres. J. Reprod. Fertil. 69, 315-322 [PubMed]
  • Vaisius A. C., Wieland T. (1982). Formation of a single phosphodiester bond by RNA polymerase B from calf thymus is not inhibited by alpha-amanitin. Biochemistry 21, 3097-3101 [PubMed]
  • Vitale A. M., Calvert M. E., Mallavarapu M., Yurttas P., Perlin J., Herr J., Coonrod S. (2007). Proteomic profiling of murine oocyte maturation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74, 608-616 [PubMed]
  • Wan L. B., Pan H., Hannenhalli S., Cheng Y., Ma J., Fedoriw A., Lobanenkov V., Latham K. E., Schultz R. M., Bartolomei M. S. (2008). Maternal depletion of CTCF reveals multiple functions during oocyte and preimplantation embryo development. Development 135, 2729-2738 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wang H., Ding T., Brown N., Yamamoto Y., Prince L. S., Reese J., Paria B. C. (2008). Zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) is involved in morula to blastocyst transformation in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 318, 112-125 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wang Q. T., Piotrowska K., Ciemerych M. A., Milenkovic L., Scott M. P., Davis R. W., Zernicka-Goetz M. (2004). A genome-wide study of gene activity reveals developmental signaling pathways in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev. Cell 6, 133-144 [PubMed]
  • Warner C. M., Versteegh L. R. (1974). In vivo and in vitro effect of alpha-amanitin on preimplantation mouse embryo RNA polymerase. Nature 248, 678-680 [PubMed]
  • Whittingham D. G., Biggers J. D. (1967). Fallopian tube and early cleavage in the mouse. Nature 213, 942-943 [PubMed]
  • Wu X., Viveiros M. M., Eppig J. J., Bai Y., Fitzpatrick S. L., Matzuk M. M. (2003). Zygote arrest 1 (Zar1) is a novel maternal-effect gene critical for the oocyte-to-embryo transition. Nat. Genet. 33, 187-191 [PubMed]
  • Xie Z., Klionsky D. J. (2007). Autophagosome formation: core machinery and adaptations. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 1102-1109 [PubMed]
  • Yurttas P., Vitale A. M., Fitzhenry R. J., Cohen-Gould L., Wu W., Gossen J. A., Coonrod S. A. (2008). Role for PADI6 and the cytoplasmic lattices in ribosomal storage in oocytes and translational control in the early mouse embryo. Development 135, 2627-2636 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zamboni L., Chakraborty J., Smith D. M. (1972). First cleavage division of the mouse zygot. An ultrastructural study. Biol. Reprod. 7, 170-193 [PubMed]
  • Zanoni M., Garagna S., Redi C. A., Zuccotti M. (2009). The 2-cell block occurring during development of outbred mouse embryos is rescued by cytoplasmic factors present in inbred metaphase II oocytes. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 129-134 [PubMed]
  • Zernicka-Goetz M., Morris S. A., Bruce A. W. (2009). Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 467-477 [PubMed]
  • Zheng P., Dean J. (2009). Role of Filia, a maternal effect gene, in maintaining euploidy during cleavage-stage mouse embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7473-7478 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ziomek C. A., Johnson M. H. (1980). Cell surface interaction induces polarization of mouse 8-cell blastomeres at compaction. Cell 21, 935-942 [PubMed]
  • Ziomek C. A., Johnson M. H. (1982). The roles of phenotype and position in guiding the fate of 16-cell mouse blastomeres. Dev. Biol. 91, 440-447 [PubMed]

Articles from Development (Cambridge, England) are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...