• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb 9, 2010; 107(6): 2413–2418.
Published online Feb 1, 2010. doi:  10.1073/pnas.0909329107
PMCID: PMC2823905
Agricultural Sciences

Enhancement of fruit shelf life by suppressing N-glycan processing enzymes


In a globalized economy, the control of fruit ripening is of strategic importance because excessive softening limits shelf life. Efforts have been made to reduce fruit softening in transgenic tomato through the suppression of genes encoding cell wall–degrading proteins. However, these have met with very limited success. N-glycans are reported to play an important role during fruit ripening, although the role of any particular enzyme is yet unknown. We have identified and targeted two ripening-specific N-glycoprotein modifying enzymes, α-mannosidase (α-Man) and β-D-N-acetylhexosaminidase (β-Hex). We show that their suppression enhances fruit shelf life, owing to the reduced rate of softening. Analysis of transgenic tomatoes revealed ≈2.5- and ≈2-fold firmer fruits in the α-Man and β-Hex RNAi lines, respectively, and ≈30 days of enhanced shelf life. Overexpression of α-Man or β-Hex resulted in excessive fruit softening. Expression of α-Man and β-Hex is induced by the ripening hormone ethylene and is modulated by a regulator of ripening, rin (ripening inhibitor). Furthermore, transcriptomic comparative studies demonstrate the down-regulation of cell wall degradation- and ripening-related genes in RNAi fruits. It is evident from these results that N-glycan processing is involved in ripening-associated fruit softening. Genetic manipulation of N-glycan processing can be of strategic importance to enhance fruit shelf life, without any negative effect on phenotype, including yield.

Keywords: α-mannosidase, β-D-N-acetylhexosaminidase, fruit softening, RNAi

The postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables in the developing countries account for almost 50% of the produce. India, the world’s second largest producer of fruits and vegetables, loses 35–40% of produce because of excessive softening. The softening that accompanies ripening of fruits exacerbates damage during shipping and handling processes. It plays a major role in determining the cost factor, because it has a direct impact on palatability, consumer acceptability, shelf life, and postharvest disease/pathogen resistance (1 3). Generally, reduction in fruit firmness due to softening is accompanied by increased expression of cell wall–degrading enzymes acting upon proteins and carbohydrates (4). However, many efforts to suppress expression of cell wall–degrading enzymes have not provided the insight needed to genetically engineer fruits whose softening can be adequately controlled (5 11). Previous studies have shown that polygalacturonase, pectin methylesterase, β-glucanase, and β-galactosidase are not sufficient to significantly impact texture (510, 12). This may be due to the presence of functionally redundant components of a complicated metabolic process (6, 7, 10, 13). It also suggests that the suppression of enzymes acting on cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin is not sufficient to prevent softening. The improvement in fruit shelf life achieved to date is not adequate, and therefore the identification of new targets is required.

N-glycoproteins are commonly found in plant cell walls, and free N-glycans occur as the precursors of glycosylation or glycoprotein proteolysis. The biologic activity of free N-glycans has been noted: injection of Man3(Xyl)GlcNAc(Fuc)GlcNAc and Man3GlcNAc into mature green tomatoes stimulated ripening, as measured by the red coloration and ethylene production (14). Free N-glycans constitute a significant fraction of the soluble oligosaccharide pool in the tomato pericarp. They are present in the pericarp tissue at all stages of tomato development, and the amount increases particularly during ripening. Moreover, the blocking of N-glycosylation delayed fruit ripening, which suggests that N-glycan processing may be important in the ripening process (15). Therefore, among the suite of enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, we targeted the N-glycan processing enzymes α-mannosidase (α-Man; EC and β-D-N-acetylhexosaminidase (β-Hex; EC α-Man and β-Hex, members of glycosyl hydrolase families 38 and 20, respectively, are known to break the glycosidic bonds between carbohydrates, as well as between carbohydrate and noncarbohydrate (16, 17). α-Man cleaves the terminal α-mannosidic linkages from both the high mannose type and plant complex type N-glycans present in glycoproteins (18), whereas, β-Hex cleaves the terminal N-acetyl-D-hexosamine residues and generates the paucimannosidic N-glycans present in most plant glycoproteins (19, 20). Moreover, α-Man and β-Hex are present at high levels during the ripening of many fruits, including the climacteric fruit tomato (16, 17). However, their molecular function remains to be elucidated. Here we report the isolation and functional characterization of α-Man and β-Hex and their use to produce transgenic fruits with enhanced shelf life.

Results and Discussion

Identification and Cloning of Tomato Ripening–Specific α-Man and β-Hex.

One of the strategies to elucidate fruit softening is to identify and characterize proteins expressed during ripening and whose biochemical activities can be mechanistically related to the observed cell wall changes. Using p-nitrophenyl-α-D-mannopyranoside (pNP-Man, K m 4.6 mM) and p-nitrophenyl-β-D-N-acetylglucosaminide (pNP-GlcNAc, K m 0.225 mM) as substrates, we found the maximum activity of α-Man and β-Hex at the breaker and pink stages of tomato ripening, respectively (Figs. 1A and 2A). However, α-Man and β-Hex activities were not detected in other parts of the plant (e.g., stem, leaves, and roots). To correlate specific activity with protein accumulation patterns during ripening, immunoblot analysis was performed using polyclonal antibodies raised against β-Hex and α-Man. The analysis revealed maximum accumulation of α-Man and β-Hex proteins at the breaker and pink stages, respectively (Figs. 1B and 2B). Ripening-related changes like climacteric ethylene production, chlorophyll degradation, lycopene synthesis, and cell wall disassembly start at the breaker stage, and subsequently an increase in expression of ripening-related cell wall hydrolases is evident (13, 21). The accumulation of α-Man and β-Hex at the critical stage of tomato ripening strengthened our hypothesis that they are involved in ripening and/or softening. To address this issue, we purified (Table S1) and characterized both α-Man and β-Hex from tomato pericarp. Purified α-Man and β-Hex constituted ≈360- and ≈300-kDa proteins, respectively, on nondenaturing PAGE (Figs. 1C and 2C). However, the molecular masses of α-Man and β-Hex on superdex 200 analytical gel filtration column were found to be ≈290 and ≈206 kDa, respectively. This discrepancy in molecular mass determined by gel filtration and nondenaturing PAGE analyses could be due to the glycoprotein nature, which was confirmed by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining and deglycosylation with endoglycosidase H (Fig. S1 A–D). Further, when separated on SDS/PAGE, α-Man and β-Hex resolved into two (70 and 45 kDa) and a single (80 kDa) polypeptide(s), respectively, suggesting that they function as oligomeric proteins in tomato cells (Figs. 1D and 2D).

Fig. 1.
Identification and isolation of ripening–specific tomato α-Man. (A) α-Man activity at ripening stage of tomato. MG, mature green; B, breaker; P, pink; RR, red ripe. Data are mean ± SEM, n = 4. (B) Immunoblot analysis of ...

On SDS/PAGE, purified α-Man was resolved into two subunits of 70 and 45 kDa, under reducing (with β-mercaptoethanol; Fig. 1D) as well as nonreducing conditions (without β-mercaptoethanol; Fig. S1E). This indicated that the subunits are associated with the hydrophobic interaction rather than the interdisulfide bonds. These two subunits are probably derived by cleavage of the 114-kDa precursor polypeptide (Fig. S2A), which is encoded by α-Man mRNA (3,090 nt). This assumption was made on the basis of the fact that the amino acid sequences of 70- and 45-kDa polypeptides were actually matching with the N-terminal and C-terminal, respectively, of the encoded polypeptide (mass spectrometry analysis). Northern blot analysis using 32P-labeled 3′ or 5′ end sequence (≈500 bp) of α-Man identified a single mRNA species of ≈3 kb (Fig. 1F). This suggests that the subunits are the consequence of posttranslational protease cleavage rather than posttranscriptional modification.

The roles of α-Man and β-Hex in ripening and/or softening were examined by cloning the genes from tomato using degenerate primers and then systematically testing their functions. In silico analysis of the α-Man sequence revealed the coding region to be 3,090 bp long, encoding a polypeptide of 1,029 aa, with a calculated molecular mass of 114 kDa (Fig. S2A). This is comparable to the combined molecular mass of the α-Man subunits (115 kDa), as determined by SDS/PAGE (Fig. 1D). The protein has three glycosyl hydrolase domains (Fig. S2B) and showed 69% identity with Vitis vinifera α-Man (XP_002276092.1). The coding region of β-Hex is 1,728 bp long, encoding a polypeptide of 575 aa with a calculated molecular mass of 64 kDa (Fig. S2C), which is less than the molecular mass determined by SDS/PAGE (80 kDa). This was attributed to posttranslational modifications because it has eight probable N-glycosylation sites (Fig. S2C), and the glycoproteic nature of the protein was confirmed by PAS staining (Fig. S1A). However, deglycosylation of the purified protein with EndoH revealed a ≈5-kDa glycans moiety (Fig. S1C). This suggests that there could be an involvement of other kinds of posttranslational modification(s) in addition to the glycosylation. β-Hex has two domains related to glycosyl hydrolase 20 (Fig. S2D) and showed 68% identity with the V. vinifera ortholog (XP_002266897.1). To verify gene expression patterns and to corroborate earlier results, Northern blot analysis was performed, which revealed that α-Man and β-Hex transcripts were most abundant at the breaker and pink stages of ripening, respectively (Figs. 1F and 2F).

α-Man and β-Hex Are the Cell Wall Proteins Involved in N-glycan Processing.

During ripening, many fruits, including tomato, disassemble the components of the cell wall, resulting in changes in the cell wall rheologic properties and softening of the ripe fruit (3, 4). The subcellular localization revealed both α-Man and β-Hex to be cell wall proteins (Fig. S3 A and B). Free N-glycans in the pericarp account for >1 μg/g of the fresh weight of tomato, which further increases during the ripening process (15). Moreover, blocking of N-glycosylation with tunicamycin delays fruit ripening. Further, when injected in fruits, N-glycans are known to stimulate red coloration and ethylene production (14). To determine the N-glycan processing ability of α-Man and β-Hex, the purified enzymes were incubated with different N-glycans commonly found in fruit pericarp. Further, release of mannose or GlcNAc was determined by high-performance anion exchange chromatography (Figs. 1E and 2E). Cell wall localization and N-glycan processing abilities of α-Man and β-Hex suggest their participation in the degradation of cell wall N-glycoproteins and the generation of free N-glycans, which further stimulate ripening, possibly by interacting with the protein(s) to transduce the potential ripening signal.

Expression of α-Man and β-Hex Is Inhibited in Tomato Ripening–Impaired Mutants and Regulated by Ethylene.

The expression of α-Man and β-Hex particularly during ripening led us to examine the ripening-impaired mutants rin, nor, and Nr. Expression analyses revealed that α-Man transcript levels were ≈10% and 70% of wild type in rin and Nr mutants, respectively, whereas, α-Man transcript level was similar to wild type in the nor mutant (Fig. 1G). The transcript levels of β-Hex were ≈20% and 10% of wild type in rin and nor fruits, respectively. However, in the case of Nr fruits, β-Hex transcript levels were ≈40% and ≈10% at pink and red ripe stages, respectively (Fig. 2G). These mutants are deficient in ripening-associated ethylene biosynthesis or ethylene perception, and they exhibit delayed fruit softening (22 24). The reduced expression of α-Man and β-Hex in these mutants strongly suggests their involvement in fruit softening and regulation by ethylene (25), through the NEVER RIPE (NR) receptor. We show that 1-aminocyclopropane 1-carboxylic acid (ACC), the precursor of ethylene, induces α-Man and β-Hex in tomato seedlings ≈2.5- and ≈4-fold, respectively (Figs. 1H and 2H). These observations indicate that α-Man and β-Hex are regulated by ethylene and act downstream of ripening regulators.

Fig. 2.
Identification and isolation of ripening-specific tomato β-Hex. (A) β-Hex enzyme activity measured during tomato ripening. MG, mature green; B, breaker; P, pink; RR, red ripe. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 4). (B) Immunoblot shows β-Hex ...

Silencing of α-Man or β-Hex Resulted in Firmer Fruits with Reduced Softening and Enhanced Shelf Life.

For functional characterizations of α-Man and β-Hex, we resorted to the “knockdown” approach to demonstrate their roles in ripening and/or softening. Endogenous expression of α-Man and β-Hex was silenced in tomato by expression of gene-specific hairpin RNAs under the control of CaMV 35S promoter (26) (Fig. S2E). Stable RNAi along with the antisense and overexpression lines were raised by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato cotyledons. To confirm and quantitate suppression of genes in RNAi fruits, quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed, which revealed up to 99% suppression of α-Man and β-Hex expression at the breaker and pink stages, respectively. However, antisense lines showed 55–80% suppression, and overexpression lines had up to 30-fold more transcript level than control (Fig. S4 A–C). Furthermore, we confirmed the generation of α-Man and β-Hex specific 21–23 mer siRNAs, which is the hallmark of RNAi-mediated silencing (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.
Silencing of α-Man or β-Hex enhances tomato shelf life. (A) Transgenic (T0) and wild-type (control) fruits were harvested at pink stage and stored at room temperature (22–24 °C in 55–60% relative humidity). The ...

Prolonging the desirable texture during ripening is the key to increasing fruit shelf life (27). For texture analysis and shelf life determination, transgenic and control (only vector transformed/nontransformed) fruits were harvested at the pink stage and stored at room temperature (23–25 °C and 55–60% relative humidity). To quantify texture, we analyzed the firmness of the fruit (Materials and Methods), which revealed enhancement of firmness in α-Man and β-Hex RNAi fruits. Ten days after the pink stage, α-Man and β-Hex RNAi fruits were ≈2.5-fold and ≈2-fold firmer than control, respectively (Fig. 3B), and showed no signs of deterioration up to 45 days (Fig. 3A). The α-Man and β-Hex antisense fruits retained the texture for 25–30 days and were ≈1.5-fold firmer than control. Overexpression lines showed early signs of fruit deterioration and were ≈30% softer than their counterpart at the pink stage (Fig. 3B). The firmness of T1 and T2 fruits of α-Man and β-Hex RNAi plants was compared with that of T0 fruits, which revealed a stable and heritable transfer of the character (Fig. S5 A and B). The RNAi lines had no negative effect on vegetative growth, fruit development, days to maturity, seed production, and yield (Table S2). Moreover, RNAi fruits essentially underwent normal climacteric ripening and color development while attached to the plant but held their texture and showed longer vine life. Further, time-lapse photography revealed that RNAi fruits, harvested at the pink stage, retained their texture and firmness up to 45 days, whereas control started shrinking and losing their texture after 15 days (Fig. 3A). We then investigated the cell wall changes during ripening of transgenic fruits and found that the cell wall of α-Man RNAi fruits was much more compact with more polysaccharide deposition on the wall than control (Fig. 3D). However, reduced cell separation was observed in β-Hex RNAi fruits as compared with control (Fig. 3E). The enzymes α-Man and β-Hex target glycoproteins and cleave the terminal α-mannose and GlcNAc residues, respectively, present in N-linked glycans. Therefore, to know the status of the α-mannose- and GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins in RNAi fruits, we performed lectin blotting using Galanthus nivalis agglutinin and wheat germ agglutinin. The analysis revealed enhanced levels of α-mannose- and GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins in the fruit of α-man and β-Hex RNAi lines, respectively (Fig. S6 A and B). To substantiate these results, we isolated the N-glycans linked to glycoproteins and found increased levels in RNAi fruits compared with control (Fig. S6C). These results suggest that the intact cell wall polysaccharides are broken down to a lesser extent in RNAi fruits as compared with control.

Suppression of α-Man or β-Hex Leads to Down-regulation of Ripening-Related Genes.

Overall, the results demonstrate a substantial improvement in fruit shelf life by targeting N-glycan-processing enzymes. Furthermore, N-glycan processing significantly affects ripening-associated changes in the cell wall: transgenic fruits showed reduced cell separation and compact cell wall compared with control (Fig. 3 D and E). Therefore, we were interested in knowing whether N-glycans, generated by α-Man and β-Hex activities, could play a physiologic role in the regulation of gene expression patterns, related to fruit ripening processes. For this, we performed comparative transcriptomic studies of pink-stage β-Hex RNAi fruits and breaker-stage α-Man RNAi fruits vs. control (only vector transformed). The analyses revealed down-regulation of many genes that are associated with fruit ripening and cell wall degradation in β-Hex and α-Man RNAi fruits (Table S3). Further, to validate these results, qRT-PCR was performed for a few genes related to fruit ripening and/or softening (Fig. 4 A and B). The RNAi fruits showed down-regulation of genes that encode certain cell wall–degrading proteins, such as pectin methylesterase, glucan endo-1,3-β-D-glucosidase, β-1,3-glucanase, endo-xyloglucan transferase, pectinesterase, expansin, pectinacetylesterase, α-galactosidase, pectate lyase, (1-4)-β-mannan endohydrolase, and β-galactosidase. Therefore, suppression of α-Man or β-Hex activity in transgenic fruits not only inhibited N-glycoprotein degradation but also affected cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin degradation. This effect on the other cell wall–degrading enzyme(s) may be due to inhibition of formation of biologically active free N-glycans in β-Hex/α-Man-RNAi fruits, which are known to induce ripening (15). Furthermore, reduced accumulation of free N-glycans in RNAi fruits compared with control suggests the possible involvement of free N-glycans during softening (Fig. S6D). Conversely, the degradation products of enzymes, which act on cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin, are not reported to act as inducers of ripening. Therefore, suppressing the activities of α-Man and β-Hex has an added advantage over the others by not only blocking degradation of the cell wall N-glycoproteins but also by inhibiting possible ripening-inducing events activated by free N-glycans. Moreover, we cannot rule out the possibility of α-Man and β-Hex modulating the function of cell wall–modifying enzymes through their maturation process.

Fig. 4.
Suppression of α-Man or β-Hex causes down-regulation of ripening-related genes. qRT-PCR analysis revealed suppression of some ripening-related genes in α-man (A) and β-Hex (B) RNAi fruits. Genes identified through microarray ...

We also found that the expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes (S-adenosylmethionine synthetase, ACC synthase, and ACC oxidase) and transcription factors like ERF and SPL3/LeCNR were suppressed in RNAi fruits (Fig. 4 A and B and Table S3); ERF is involved in the expression of ethylene-inducible genes, and LeCNR, a MADS box protein, is essential for fruit ripening (28, 29). Although α-Man and β-Hex are induced by ethylene (Figs. 1H and and22 H), they may also further act by promoting ethylene biosynthesis, possibly through free N-glycans, which when injected in the fruit demonstrated ethylene production (14). Altogether, our results provide evidence that α-Man and β-Hex function through degradation of cell wall glycoproteins, followed by an increase in the free N-glycans level. The results also address the occurrence of free N-glycans in tomato and their potential involvement in ripening and/or softening. A model presented in Fig. S6E illustrates the function and regulation of α-Man and β-Hex during climacteric fruit ripening.


This work identified two N-glycan processing enzymes and their cognate genes, contributing to ripening-associated softening in tomato. Our strategy allows the achievement of desired texture/firmness and enhancement of fruit shelf life by judicious manipulation of N-glycan processing without any ill effects. The study highlights the importance of free N-glycans and their processing in developmental processes like ripening. It also extends the scope of carbohydrate active enzymes (CaZymes). The high levels of α-Man and β-Hex activities in the fruits such as papaya, banana, and mango also suggest their potential involvement in the softening of other climacteric fruits (30). In conclusion, the engineering of plants with modified N-glycan processing ability provides a strategy for crop improvement that can be extended to other important fruit crops.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Growth Conditions.

Tomato (cv. Pusa ruby) seeds were obtained from the National Seeds Corporation Ltd., New Delhi. Mutants used in the study were procured from the Tomato Genetics Resource Center, University of California at Davis, and were in Ailsa Craig background. Seeds were germinated in presterilized soil and later transplanted to the greenhouse with at ≈25 °C, 70% humidity, and 14/10 h light/dark regimen. For analysis, fruits were harvested at mature green, breaker, pink, and red ripe stages after tagging of flowers at anthesis.

Protein Purification, Mass Spectrometry, and Gene Cloning.

α-Man and β-Hex enzymes were purified from tomato pericarp by subjecting to ammonium sulfate precipitation, followed by anion exchange, ConA affinity (only for β-Hex), and gel filtration chromatography. Purified protein was characterized by 12% SDS/PAGE, 6% nondenaturing PAGE, glycoprotein staining, and EndoH treatment. The protein gel bands were cut from Coomassie-stained SDS/PAGE and analyzed by electrospray ion trap time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Q-Star Pulsar i; Applied Biosystems). The spectra were analyzed by Mascot sequence matching software (Matrix Science) against the Viridiplantae (green plants) database. Degenerate primers were used to clone α-Man and β-Hex through 3′ and 5′ RACE methods (SI Materials and Methods).

Staining and Microscopy.

Fruit sections were cut with the help of a cryostat microtome (Leica CM1510S) and were allowed to dry on the slides. The slides were then dipped in aqueous solution of 0.05% toluidine blue (31) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for 2 min and were washed with water for 2 min. To examine the cell wall structure, the sections were immersed in 0.05% calcofluor (32) and washed with distilled water. The stained sections were mounted in water under a coverslip and photographed using a Nikon 80i epifluorescent/phase contrast/bright field microscope. The subcellular localization methods are described in SI Materials and Methods.

qRT PCR Analysis.

For gene expression analysis, 5μg total RNA was extracted by the LiCl precipitation method (33) and was reverse transcribed and used for qRT PCR analysis (34) with SYBR green dye (SI Materials and Methods).

High-Performance Anion Exchange Chromatography, Immunoblotting, and Detection of siRNA.

One microgram of enzyme was incubated with 100 ng of the N-linked oligosaccharide (Dextra) at 37 °C overnight. After passing through the PVDF membrane, 10 μL of the sample was analyzed with an HPAE-PAD system (Dionex DX 500 BioLC) using a Carbopac PA-1, 4 × 250-mm column. The standard (mannose or GlcNAc) was injected at a concentration of 100 nmol before and after each analysis. For immunoblot analysis, proteins were resolved on 12.5% SDS/PAGE and later electro-transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking the nonspecific sites, the membrane was incubated with the primary antibody specific to β-Hex or 70-kDa subunit of α-Man (1:2,500). Immunodetection was done with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Scientific). Total RNA was enriched for the small-molecular-weight RNA as described previously (35). Small-molecular-weight RNA was resolved on 15% urea PAGE and electro-transferred to nylon membrane. The nylon membrane was UV cross-linked, and Northern blotting was carried out (SI Materials and Methods).

RNAi/Antisense/Overexpression Plasmids Construction and Tomato Transfor-mation.

α-Man and β-Hex were silenced using the pHANNIBAL vector as described previously (26). Antisense constructs were prepared in pBI121 by replacing the GUS gene and cloning the α-Man or β-Hex full-length sequence in reverse orientation. Overexpression constructs consisted of full-length sequence of α-Man or β-Hex gene cloned in pBI121. To generate transgenic tomato plants, cotyledons from 2-week-old seedlings were used as described previously (36). Briefly, tomato seeds were sterilized using 4% commercial bleach and germinated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium. After 2 weeks of germination, the cotyledons were cut and cocultivated for 30 min with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 harboring different constructs. The cotyledons were then collected for selection on MS plates containing 50 mg/L kanamycin. When the plantlets regenerated, they were transferred to rooting medium. Transgenic seeds were germinated in MS medium containing 50 mg/L kanamycin to get the progeny plants.

Textural Analysis.

Fruit firmness was determined using TA-XT Plus (Stable Microsystems). Each fruit was analyzed with a 75-mm-wide P75 compression plate and compressed to a vertical displacement of 5 mm with the test speed of 1 mm s−1. The firmness was defined as the response force to a 5 × g applied force. The significance was calculated by unpaired t test.

ACC Treatment.

Fifteen-day-old tomato seedlings, germinated on MS media, were transferred to liquid MS media containing 1 mM ACC, harvested at the different time points, and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen.


To know any changes in gene expression profile due to silencing of α-Man and β-Hex genes, we compared the transcriptomes of RNAi and control fruits using Affymetrix GeneChip tomato genome array. This comprehensive array consists of more than 10,000 Solanum lycopersicum probe sets to interrogate more than 9,200 S. lycopersicum transcripts. Duplicate biologic samples from transgenic and vector control were used for microarray analysis. Fruits from breaker (α-Man) or pink (β-Hex) stages of ripening were taken for analysis. Detailed methods are described in SI Materials and Methods.

Lectin Blotting and N-glycans Isolation.

Proteins were resolved on 12.5% SDS/PAGE and electro-transferred to the nitrocellulose membrane. Lectin blotting (SI Materials and Methods) was performed using wheat germ agglutinin (binds to GlcNAc; Sigma) or G. nivalis agglutinin (binds to mannose; Roche). Glycoprotein-linked N-glycans and free N-glycans were isolated as described previously (37, 38), with few modifications (SI Materials and Methods).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information:


CSIRO Plant Industry Australia and Tomato Genetic Resource Center (University of California, Davis) provided pHANNIBAL, pART27, pK7FWG2,0 vectors and mutant seeds, respectively. This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India. V.S.M. and S.G. have received fellowships from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research.


The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information GeneBank database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accession nos. EU244853 and EU244854).

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0909329107/DCSupplemental.


1. Causier B, Kieffer M, Davies B. MADS-Box genes reach maturity. Science. 2002;296:275–276. [PubMed]
2. Vicente AR, Saladie M, Rose JKC, Labavitch JM. The linkage between cell wall metabolism and fruit softening: looking to the future. J Sci Food Agric. 2007;87:1435–1448.
3. Brummell DA. Cell wall disassembly in ripening fruit. Funct Plant Biol. 2006;33:103–119.
4. Fry SC. Primary cell wall metabolism: Tracking the careers of wall polymers in living plant cells. New Phytol. 2004;161:641–675.
5. Giovannoni J, DellaPenna D, Bennett A, Fischer R. Expression of a chimeric polygalacturonase gene in transgenic rin (ripening inhibitor) tomato fruit results in polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening. Plant Cell. 1989;1:53–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Tieman DM, Harriman RW, Ramamohan G, Handa AK. An antisense pectin methylesterase gene alters pectin chemistry and soluble solids in tomato fruit. Plant Cell. 1992;4:667–679. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Brummell DA, Hall BD, Bennett AB. Antisense suppression of tomato endo-1,4-beta-glucanase Cel2 mRNA accumulation increases the force required to break fruit abscission zones but does not affect fruit softening. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;40:615–622. [PubMed]
8. Giovannoni J. Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52:725–749. [PubMed]
9. Rose JKC, Catala C, Gonzalez-Carranza CZ, Roberts JA. In: The Plant Cell Wall. Rose JKC, editor. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2003. pp. 264–324.
10. Brummell DA, Harpster MH. Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2001;47:311–340. [PubMed]
11. Saladie M, Rose JKC, Watkins CB. Characterization of DFD (delayed fruit deterioration): A new tomato mutant. Acta Hortic. 2005;682:79–84.
12. Sheehy R, Kramer M, Hiatt W. Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:8805–8809. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Giovannoni JJ. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell. 2004;16:S170–S180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Priem B, Gross K. Mannosyl and Xylosyl- containing glycans promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 1992;98:399–401. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Priem B, Gitti R, Bush CA, Gross KC. Structure of ten free N-glycans in ripening tomato fruit (arabinose is a constituent of a plant N-glycan) Plant Physiol. 1993;102:445–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Suvarnalatha G, Prabha TN. α-D-Mannosidase from Lycopersicon esculentum II . Phytochemistry. 1999;50:1111–1115.
17. Jagadeesh BH, Prabha TN, Srinivasan K. Activities of glycosidases during fruit development and ripening of tomato (Lycopersicum esculantum L.): Implication in fruit ripening. Plant Sci. 2004;166:1451–1459.
18. Hossain AM, Nakamura K, Kimura Y. α-Mannosidase involved in turnover of plant complex type N-glycans in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) fruits. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73:140–146. [PubMed]
19. Strasser R, et al. Enzymatic properties and subcellular localization of Arabidopsis β-N-acetylhexosaminidases. Plant Physiol. 2007;145:5–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Gutternigg M, et al. Biosynthesis of truncated N-linked oligosaccharides results from non-orthologous hexosaminidase-mediated mechanisms in nematodes, plants, and insects. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:27825–27840. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Fischer RL, Bennett AB. Role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit ripening. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1991;42:675–703.
22. Vrebalov J, et al. A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (Rin) locus. Science. 2002;296:343–346. [PubMed]
23. Tigchelaar EC, McGlasson WB, Buescher RW. Genetic regulation of tomato fruit ripening. HortScience. 1978;13:508–513.
24. Wilkinson JQ, Lanahan MB, Yen HC, Giovannoni JJ, Klee HJ. An ethylene-inducible component of signal-transduction encoded by Neverripe . Science. 1995;270:1807–1809. [PubMed]
25. Oeller PW, Lu MW, Taylor LP, Pike DA, Theologis A. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA. Science. 1991;254:437–439. [PubMed]
26. Wesley S-V, et al. Construct design for efficient, effective and high throughput gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 2001;27:581–590. [PubMed]
27. Chapple C, Carpita N. Plant cell walls as targets for biotechnology. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998;1:179–185. [PubMed]
28. Adams-Phillips L, Barry C, Giovannoni J. Signal transduction systems regulating fruit ripening. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:331–338. [PubMed]
29. Manning K, et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet. 2006;38:948–952. [PubMed]
30. Jagadeesh BH, Prabha TN. β-Hexosaminidase, an enzyme from ripening bell capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. variata) Phytochemistry. 2002;61:295–300. [PubMed]
31. O’Brien TP, Feder N, McCully ME. Ploychromatic staining of plant cell walls by Toluidine Blue O. Protoplasma. 1964;59:367–373.
32. Hendry GAF, Jones OTG. Induction of cytochrome p-450 in intact mung beans. New Phytol. 1984;96:153–159.
33. Menke FLH, Parchmann S, Mueller MJ, Kijne JW, Memelink J. Involvement of the octadecanoid pathway and protein phosphorylation in fungal elicitor-induced expression of terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis genes in Catharanthus roseus . Plant Physiol. 1999;119:1289–1296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Bovy A, et al. High-flavonol tomatoes resulting from the heterologous expression of the maize transcription factor gene LC and C1 . Plant Cell. 2002;14:2509–2526. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Dalmay T, Hamilton H, Mueller E, Boulcombe DC. Potato virus X amplicons in Arabidopsis mediae genetic and epigenetic gene silencing. Plant Cell. 2000;12:369–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Fillati JJ, Kiser J, Rose R, Comai L. Efficient transfer of a C glyphosphate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium tumifaciens vector. Biotechnology. 1987;5:726–730.
37. Wilson IBH, et al. Analysis of Asn-linked glycans from vegetable foodstuffs: widespread occurrence of Lewis a, core α1,3-linked fucose and xylose substitutions. Glycobiology. 2001;11:261–274. [PubMed]
38. Nakamura K, Inoue M, Yoshiie T, Hosoi K, Kimura Y. Changes in structural features of free N-glycans and endoglycosidase activity during tomato fruit ripening. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72:2936–2945. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...