• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of persooniaLink to Publisher's site
Persoonia. Dec 2009; 23: 35–40.
Published online Aug 4, 2009. doi:  10.3767/003158509X470602
PMCID: PMC2802727

New primers for promising single-copy genes in fungal phylogenetics and systematics


Developing powerful phylogenetic markers is a key concern in fungal phylogenetics. Here we report degenerate primers that amplify the single-copy genes Mcm7 (MS456) and Tsr1 (MS277) across a wide range of Pezizomycotina (Ascomycota). Phylogenetic analyses of 59 taxa belonging to the Eurotiomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Leotiomycetes, Lichinomycetes and Sordariomycetes, indicate the utility of these loci for fungal phylogenetics at taxonomic levels ranging from genus to class. We also tested the new primers in silico using sequences of Saccharomycotina, Taphrinomycotina and Basidiomycota to predict their potential of amplifying widely across the Fungi. The analyses suggest that the new primers will need no, or only minor sequence modifications to amplify Saccharomycotina, Taphrinomycotina and Basidiomycota.

Keywords: Ascomycota, DNA replication licensing factor, evolution, lichenised fungi, Mcm7, MS277, MS456, phylogeny, pre-rRNA processing protein, protein-coding, Tsr1


Molecular systematics has revolutionised our view of fungal evolution. Recent large scale sequencing efforts resulted in comprehensive multi-locus phylogenies, which have significantly improved our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within fungi (Binder & Hibbett 2002, Lumbsch et al. 2004, Lutzoni et al. 2004, James et al. 2006). These data led to the first phylogenetic classification of the Fungi (Hibbett et al. 2007). However, early events in fungal evolution still remain uncertain because of missing support and resolution at the backbone of the phylogeny. We lack information, for example, about the relationships of the different ascomycete classes to one another, or the evolution within major lineages, such as the lichenised Lecanoromycetes, or the basidiomycete clade Agaricomycetes. Robust and well-supported phylogenies are essential for a better understanding of fungal evolution, and a prerequisite for studies aiming at reconstructing the evolution of non-molecular characters on the background of a molecular phylogeny.

Commonly used molecular loci in fungal phylogenetics include nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal rDNA (18S, 28S, ITS, IGS, mtSSU, mtLSU), as well as protein-coding genes, such as RNA polymerases (RPB1 and RPB2), β-tubulin, γ-actin, ATP synthase (ATP6), and elongation factor EF-1α (TEF1α). Some single-copy protein-coding genes such as RPB1 and RPB2 are promising for yielding well resolved and highly supported phylogenies (Liu & Hall 2004, Reeb et al. 2004, Crespo et al. 2007, Lumbsch et al. 2007). Other protein-coding genes, such as the tubulins, are present in the genome in multiple copies and thus have the potential of being phylogenetically misleading (Landvik et al. 2001). Generally, slow evolving loci are more suitable for reconstruction of deep phylogenetic relationships, while loci with high rates of evolution are better for the reconstruction of more recent evolutionary events. Ribosomal loci with high and heterogeneous rates of change, such as ITS, IGS and mtSSU rDNA, can be used to distinguish taxa at the genus and species level. However, the non-coding regions of these loci are prone to significant length variation, making alignment of distantly related taxa problematic. Fast evolving ribosomal genes are therefore less useful in large scale concatenated analyses involving higher-level phylogenetic relationships. Molecular systematists are constantly searching for loci that are conserved enough to produce reliable alignments, and at the same time have sufficient variability to yield well resolved and well supported phylogenies. Analysing phylogenetic relationships at lower and higher taxonomic levels simultaneously, while using only a few loci, is desirable, because sequencing entire genomes or even multiple loci is not feasible for many phylogenetically interesting taxa. Fungal material suitable for molecular study is often limited, and culturing of many species impossible.

In a recent study Aguileta et al. (2008) used a bioinformatics approach to assess the performance of single-copy protein-coding genes for fungal phylogenetics. Their analyses of 30 published fungal genomes revealed two loci, MS277 and MS456, which outperformed all other single-copy genes in phylogenetic utility. MS277 corresponds to the gene Tsr1, required for rRNA accumulation during biogenesis of the ribosome (Gelperin et al. 2001), while MS456 corresponds to the gene Mcm7, a DNA replication licensing factor required for DNA replication initiation and cell proliferation (Moir et al. 1982, Kearsey & Labib 1998). Alignments based on these two loci alone recovered phylogenies that had the same topology, resolution power, and branch support as phylogenies based on a concatenated analysis of all 135 orthologous single-copy genes identified from fungal genomes (Aguileta et al. 2008). Strikingly, the authors report that most protein-coding genes commonly used in fungal systematics, such as RPB1, RPB2, TEF1α, β-tubulin, and γ-actin are not found among the best performing genes.

In the current study we designed degenerate primers to amplify a 600–800 bp fragment of each, MS277 and MS456, over a wide range of Pezizomycotina. We tested variability and phylogenetic utility of these loci at taxonomic levels ranging from genus to class. Our analyses include in silico comparisons of the new primers to sequences of Saccharomycotina and Basidiomycota to predict primer utility in these phylogenetic groups.


Material and GenBank sequences used in the current study are listed in Table 1. We designed new degenerate primers based on amino acid alignments of Mcm7 (MS456) and Tsr1 (MS277) of euascomycete sequences available in GenBank. These alignments included members of Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes. Primer sequences and annealing conditions are reported in Table 2 and and3.3. The locations of the fragments amplified by the new primers are indicated in Fig. 1. We used Aspergillus nidulans mRNA sequences of Mcm7 and Tsr1 as reference sequences (GenBank accession numbers XM_658504 and XM_658778). Saccharomycotina, Taphrinomycotina and Basidiomycota used for in silico analysis of primer fit are listed in Table 4.

Table 1
Material and DNA sequences used in this study.
Table 2
Primers developed in the current study.
Table 3
Annealing conditions and PCR success rates for primers used in this study.
Table 4
Taxa used to test the fit of the new primers in silico.

Molecular procedures

We extracted total genomic DNA from our samples using the Qiagen Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). PCR reactions (25 μL) contained PuReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR beads (GE Healthcare), 1.25 μL of each primer (10 mM), 19.5 μL H2O, and 3 μL DNA template. Alternatively we used 0.125 μL AmpliTaq Gold Taq (Applied Biosystems), 2.5 μL buffer, 2 μL dNTPs, 2.5–4 μL MgCl (20 mM), 0–5 μL BSA, 1.25 μL of each primer, and 3 μL DNA template. We found that increasing the amount of forward primer Tsr1-1459for to 2.5 μL, as well as adding 2 μL MgCl (20 mM) to PCR reactions involving PCR beads often improved PCR results. PCR cycling conditions for Mcm7-709for/Mcm7-1447rev and Mcm7-709for/Mcm7-1348rev (MS456) were: initial denaturation 94 °C for 10 min, followed by 38 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 56 °C for 50 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and final elongation 72 °C for 5 min. PCR cycling conditions for Tsr1-1459for/Tsr1-2308rev (MS277) were the same as above except with 49 °C annealing temperature. Amplification products were stained with EZ-Vision DNA dye (Amresco) and viewed on 1 % low melt agarose gels. We excised bands of the expected length from the gel and purified them using GELase (Epicentre). Alternatively, PCR products were cleaned using the Bioclean Columns kit (Biotools, Madrid) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We sequenced the fragments using Big Dye v3.1 chemistry (Applied Biosystems) and the same primers as for PCR. Cycle sequencing was executed with the following program: initial denaturation for 1 min at 96 °C followed by 32 cycles of 96 °C for 15 s, 50 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 4 min. Sequenced products were precipitated with 25 μL of 100 % EtOH mixed with 1 μL of 3 M NaOAC, and 1 μL of EDTA, before they were loaded on an ABI PRISMTM 3730 DNA Analyser (Applied Biosystems). We assembled partial sequences using SeqMan v4.03 (Lasergene) and edited conflicts manually. We aligned the sequences based on amino acid sequence using ClustalW as implemented in the program BioEdit v7.0.9 (Hall 1999) and subsequently translated them back to nucleotides.

Phylogenetic analyses

We assembled two alignments including the same 59 taxa each. For phylogenetic analysis we used a maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and a Bayesian approach (B/MCMC) (Larget & Simon 1999, Huelsenbeck et al. 2001). We performed all analyses on the single gene alignments as well as on a combined alignment. We tested for potential conflict between individual datasets by comparing the 75 % MP bootstrap consensus trees.

We used PAUP v4.0 (Swofford 2003), GARLI v0.96 (Zwickl 2006) and MrBayes v3.1.2. (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001) to analyse the alignments. MP analyses included 100 replicates with random sequence additions and TBR branch swapping in effect. MP bootstrapping (Felsenstein 1985) was performed based on 2 000 replicates with the same settings as for the MP search. Likelihood analyses were run using the GTR+I+G model and default settings in GARLI. For Bayesian analyses we partitioned the dataset into three parts (each codon position) and each partition was allowed to have its own parameter values (Nylander et al. 2004). No molecular clock was assumed, and no interpartition rate heterogeneity was allowed. Heating of the chains was set to 0.2. A run with 3 000 000 generations starting with a random tree and employing 4 simultaneous chains was executed for the individual datasets. Every 100th tree was saved into a file. The first 300 000 generations (i.e. the first 3 000 trees) were deleted as the ‘burn in’ of the chain. For the combined alignment dataset we executed a run with 6 000 000 generations and deleted the initial 600 000 generations (i.e. the first 6 000 trees). We plotted the log-likelihood scores of sample points against generation time using TRACER v1.0 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/) to ensure that stationarity was achieved after the first 300 000 (600 000 for the combined alignment dataset) generations by checking whether the log-likelihood values of the sample points reached a stable equilibrium value (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001). Additionally, we used AWTY (Nylander et al. 2008) to compare splits frequencies in the different runs and to plot cumulative split frequencies to ensure that stationarity was reached. We calculated a majority rule consensus tree with average branch lengths of the remaining 54 000 trees (27 000 from each of the parallel runs) using the sumt option of MrBayes. For the combined alignment dataset the majority rule consensus tree consisted of 108 000 (2 × 54 000) trees from the stationarity phase. Posterior probabilities were obtained for each clade. Clades with posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 were considered as strongly supported. Phylogenetic trees were visualised using the program Treeview (Page 1996).


We report 84 new sequences of Mcm7 (MS456) and Tsr1 (MS277) for 42 lichenised ascomycetes belonging to the classes Eurotiomycetes, Lecanoromycetes and Lichinomycetes (Table 1). PCR success rates for our newly developed primers were highest for the primer combination Mcm7-709for/Mcm7-1348rev (± 80 %), while Mcm7-709for/Mcm7-1447rev worked in ± 50 % of the attempted PCRs, and the Tsr1 primers in ± 40 %. Multiple bands were sometimes present when we used the primer combinations Mcm7-709for/Mcm7-1447rev and Tsr1-1459for/Tsr1-2308rev. Tsr1-1453for is a modification of Tsr1-1459for that we used under the same annealing conditions. We used the Aspergillus nidulans mRNA sequences of Mcm7 (XM_658504) and Tsr1 (XM_658778) as references for the locations of our primers. The full length genomic DNA sequences of Aspergillus nidulans Mcm7 and Tsr1 contain 1–2 introns of ± 60 bp length, which, however, do not overlap with the sequence fragments amplified by primers developed in this study. We found introns (length: 189–272 bp) with characteristic GT-intron-AG splice sites near the reverse primer (Tsr1-2308rev) in Tsr1 in three Lecanora species. Two hypervariable regions containing many gaps (Tsr1: positions 198–221 and 518–628) were excluded from the phylogenetic analysis. The Mcm7 alignment contained no gaps and no ambiguously aligned regions. Properties of the sequences and alignments are summarized in Table 5. We performed parsimony bootstrap analyses on each individual dataset, and examined 75 % bootstrap consensus trees for conflict (Lutzoni et al. 2004). We used the program Modeltest v3.7 (Posada & Crandall 1998) to determine the nucleotide substitution model that best fit our data. For both datasets the program selected the GTR+I+G model.

Table 5
Mcm7 and Tsr1 sequence and alignment properties.

The tree topologies obtained from the single gene datasets resulting from MP, ML and Bayesian analyses did not show any strongly supported conflicts. Thus, we present only the B/MCMC tree of the combined analysis (Fig. 2). Statistical values and number of supported nodes obtained by MP, ML and Bayesian analyses of single and combined datasets are summarised in Table 6. The Sordariomycetes were used as outgroup. The classes Sordariomycetes, Leotiomycetes, Eurotiomycetes and Lecanoromycetes are monophyletic and highly supported (PP ≥ 95). Lichinomycetes is only represented by a single species, Peltula euploca. The phylogenetic estimate obtained from the combined analysis of Mcm7 and Tsr1 agrees with previously published phylogenies (Gargas et al. 1995, James et al. 2006). Lecanoromycetes form a supported sister group relationship with Eurotiomycetes. Basal to this are Lichinomycetes and Leotiomycetes. Within Lecanoromycetes, the subclasses Lecanoromycetidae and Ostropomycetidae form supported groups, while the genus Umbilicaria is in an unsupported position at the base of Lecanoromycetes. Within Eurotiomycetes, Eurotiomycetidae and Chaetothyriomycetidae form supported clades. We included multiple species/strains of the genera Aspergillus (7), Lecanora (6), and Malcolmiella (11) to assess within-genus variation of the analysed loci, as well as resolution power at low taxonomic levels. Genetic distances within Aspergillus, Lecanora and Malcolmiella are reported in Table 5. Each of these genera forms a supported monophyletic clade with high internal resolution and support (Fig. 2).

Table 6
Comparison of phylogenetic analyses (MP, ML, B/MCMC) between single and combined datasets.
Fig. 2
Phylogeny of Pezizomycotina (Ascomycota) based on a combined alignment of Mcm7 (MS456) and Tsr1 (MS277) sequences. Total alignment length is 1203 bp. This is a 50 % majority rule consensus tree based on a sampling of 108 000 B/MCMC trees. Bold branches ...

We aligned selected members of Saccharomycotina, Taphrinomycotina and Basidiomycota (Table 4) with our datasets and compared the new primer sequences to the corresponding positions in these taxa. The low number of mismatches suggests that the new primers will need no adjustments or only minor modifications to also fit these phylogenetic groups (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
Comparison of the new primers to homologous sequences in Saccharomycotina (Ashbya, Kluyveromyces, Saccharomyces, Yarrowia), Taphrinomycotina (Schizosaccharomyces) and Basidiomycota (Coprinopsis, Cryptococcus, Ustilago). 100 % matches between primer sequence ...


We developed new degenerate primers, which amplify fragments of the single-copy protein-coding genes Mcm7 and Tsr1 in Pezizomycotina. Our study confirms that Mcm7 and Tsr1 are suitable loci for the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships among fungi (Aguileta et al. 2008). We were able to obtain sequences from representatives of 5 classes and 11 orders of euascomycetes, demonstrating the ability of the primers to amplify a wide range of unrelated taxa. Additionally we tested primer fit in silico using members of Saccharomycotina, Taphrinomycotina and Basidiomycota and found that the new primers can be used for these groups as well, possibly with slight sequence modifications.

Our analyses within Pezizomycotina show that Mcm7 and Tsr1 are able to resolve large scale as well as fine scale phylogenetic relationships. The sequences are alignable across a wide range of unrelated taxa and at the same time have sufficient variability to resolve within-genus relationships (Table 5). This property sets the new loci apart from commonly used ribosomal markers, such as ITS or mtSSU, which also have the power to resolve lower level phylogenetic relationships, but may yield ambiguous and saturated alignments, when used to compare distantly related taxa. We predict that Mcm7 and Tsr1 have an even higher potential to resolve phylogenetic relationships between fungi when analyzed in combination with other routinely used datasets, such as 18S, 28S, RPB1 and RPB2.

Mcm7 and Tsr1 are two relatively long (~ 2.5 kb) single-copy genes which can be aligned across major fungal lineages, such as Ascomycota and Basidiomycota (Aguileta et al. 2008). The fact that Homo sapiens sequences can be used as outgroups (Aguileta et al. 2008, www.systematicbiology.org, online Appendix 5) indicates that these loci might also be useful for phylogenetic studies involving fungi as well as non-fungal organisms.


We thank Fabian Ernemann (Chicago) and Paul Nelson (St. Paul) for support with lab work and sequence editing. This study was supported by start-up funds to I.S. from the University of Minnesota, Student Research Funding to NAN from Augsburg College, NSF grants DEB-0516116 (PI: HTL) and DEB-0715660 (PI: Robert Lücking) to The Field Museum, and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through a Ramon y Cajal grant (RYC02007-01576) to PKD. We wish to thank James Lendemer (New York), Robert Lücking (Chicago), and Zdenek Palice (Praha) for allowing us to use their collections for DNA isolation. Several of the new sequences were generated in the Pritzker Laboratory at the Field Museum.


  • Aguileta G, Marthey S, Chiapello H, Lebrun MH, Rodolphe F, Fournier E, Gendrault-Jacquemard A, Giraud T. 2008. Assessing the performance of single-copy genes for recovering robust phylogenies. Systematic Biology 57: 613 – 627. [PubMed]
  • Binder M, Hibbett DS. 2002. Higher-level phylogenetic relationships of homobasidiomycetes (mushroom-forming fungi) inferred from four rDNA regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 76 – 90. [PubMed]
  • Crespo A, Lumbsch HT, Mattsson JE, Blanco O, Divakar PK, Articus K, Wiklund E, Bawingan PA, Wedin M. 2007. Testing morphology-based hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships in Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota) using three ribosomal markers and the nuclear RPB1 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 812 – 824. [PubMed]
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783 – 791.
  • Gargas A, Depriest PT, Grube M, Tehler A. 1995. Multiple origins of lichen symbioses in Fungi suggested by SSU rDNA phylogeny. Science 268: 1492 – 1495. [PubMed]
  • Gelperin D, Horton L, Beckman J, Hensold J, Lemmon SK. 2001. Bms1p, a novel GTP-binding protein, and the related Tsr1p are required for distinct steps of 40S ribosome biogenesis in yeast. Rna-a Publication of the Rna Society 7: 1268 – 1283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95 – 98.
  • Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, et al. 2007. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycological Research 111: 509 – 547. [PubMed]
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754 – 755. [PubMed]
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Evolution – Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 2310 – 2314. [PubMed]
  • James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, et al. 2006. Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature 443: 818 – 822. [PubMed]
  • Kearsey SE, Labib K. 1998. MCM proteins: evolution, properties, and role in DNA replication. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1398: 113 – 136. [PubMed]
  • Landvik S, Eriksson OE, Berbee ML. 2001. Neolecta – a fungal dinosaur? Evidence from beta-tubulin amino acid sequences. Mycologia 93: 1151 – 1163.
  • Larget B, Simon DL. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 750 – 759.
  • Liu YJ, Hall BD. 2004. Body plan evolution of ascomycetes, as inferred from an RNA polymerase II, phylogeny. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 4507 – 4512. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I, Mangold A, Wedin M. 2007. Ascus types are phylogenetically misleading in Trapeliaceae and Agyriaceae (Ostropomycetidae, Ascomycota). Mycological Research 111: 1133 – 1141. [PubMed]
  • Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I, Palice Z, Wiklund E, Ekman S, Wedin M. 2004. Supraordinal phylogenetic relationships of Lecanoromycetes based on a Bayesian analysis of combined nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 822 – 832. [PubMed]
  • Lutzoni F, Kauff F, Cox CJ, McLaughlin D, Celio G, et al. 2004. Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification, and evolution of subcellular traits. American Journal of Botany 91: 1446 – 1480. [PubMed]
  • Moir D, Stewart SE, Osmond BC, Botstein D. 1982. Cold-sensitive cell-division-cycle mutants of yeast: Isolation, properties, and pseudoreversion studies. Genetics 100: 547 – 563. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey JL. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53: 47 – 67. [PubMed]
  • Nylander JAA, Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL. 2008. AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24: 581 – 583. [PubMed]
  • Page RDM. 1996. TreeView: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12: 357 – 358. [PubMed]
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817 – 818. [PubMed]
  • Reeb V, Lutzoni F, Roux C. 2004. Contribution of RPB2 to multilocus phylogenetic studies of the euascomycetes (Pezizomycotina, Fungi) with special emphasis on the lichen-forming Acarosporaceae and evolution of polyspory. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 1036 – 1060. [PubMed]
  • Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods, v4.0b10 Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA:
  • Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. PhD dissertation The University of Texas at Austin, USA:

Articles from Persoonia : Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Naturalis Biodiversity Center & Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...