![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright ©2009 Thwin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Suppressive effect of secretory phospholipase A2 inhibitory peptide on interleukin-1β-induced matrix metalloproteinase production in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts, and its antiarthritic activity in hTNFtg mice 1Department of Anatomy, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 4 Medical Drive, National University of Singapore, 117597 Singapore 2Institute of Immunology, Biomedical Sciences Research Center, Alexander Fleming, 34 Al. Fleming Street, 16672 Vari, Greece 3Porter Neuroscience Research Center, NEI/NIH, 35 Lincoln Drive, MSC 3731, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 4 Medical Drive, National University of Singapore, 117597 Singapore Corresponding author.Maung-Maung Thwin: antmmt/at/nus.edu.sg; Eleni Douni: douni/at/fleming.gr; Pachiappan Arjunan: pachiarjun/at/yahoo.com; George Kollias: g.kollias/at/fleming.gr; Prem V Kumar: doskumar/at/nus.edu.sg; Ponnampalam Gopalakrishnakone: antgopal/at/nus.edu.sg Received March 16, 2009; Revisions requested May 6, 2009; Revised September 9, 2009; Accepted September 18, 2009. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Introduction Secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors are potent modulators of inflammation with therapeutic potential, but have limited efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to understand the inhibitory mechanism of phospholipase inhibitor from python (PIP)-18 peptide in cultured synovial fibroblasts (SF), and to evaluate its therapeutic potential in a human tumor necrosis factor (hTNF)-driven transgenic mouse (Tg197) model of arthritis. Methods Gene and protein expression of sPLA2-IIA, MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, and TIMP-2 were analyzed by real time PCR and ELISA respectively, in interleukin (IL)-1β stimulated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) synovial fibroblasts cells treated with or without inhibitors of sPLA2 (PIP-18, LY315920) or MMPs (MMP Inhibitor II). Phosphorylation status of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) proteins was examined by cell-based ELISA. The effect of PIP-18 was compared with that of celecoxib, methotrexate, infliximab and antiflamin-2 in Tg197 mice after ip administration (thrice weekly for 5 weeks) at two doses (10, 30 mg/kg), and histologic analysis of ankle joints. Serum sPLA2 and cytokines (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, IL-6) were measured by Escherichia coli (E coli) assay and ELISA, respectively. Results PIP-18 inhibited sPLA2-IIA production and enzymatic activity, and suppressed production of MMPs in IL-1β-induced RA and OA SF cells. Treatment with PIP-18 blocked IL-1β-induced p38 MAPK phosphorylation and resulted in attenuation of sPLA2-IIA and MMP mRNA transcription in RA SF cells. The disease modifying effect of PIP-18 was evidenced by significant abrogation of synovitis, cartilage degradation and bone erosion in hTNF Tg197 mice. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the benefit that can be gained from using sPLA2 inhibitory peptide for RA treatment, and validate PIP-18 as a potential therapeutic in a clinically relevant animal model of human arthritis. Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that is considered to be one of the more common and difficult to treat autoimmune diseases. Although the biologic agents (e.g., monoclonal antibodies to TNF and IL-6 receptor, and recombinant soluble TNFα receptor, etc.) can achieve significant suppression of the complex inflammatory network and ameliorate the disease, they are still subject to the general disadvantages associated with protein drugs, such as insufficient immune response to infectious agents and autoimmunity [1,2]. Therefore, further development of molecular agents that target the specific intracellular pathways that are activated in RA synovium would offer an attractive therapeutic option. Besides cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules and matrix degrading enzymes that are responsible for synovial proliferation and joint destruction [3], phospholipase A2 (PLA2), a key enzyme in the production of diverse mediators of inflammatory conditions, is also implicated in the pathophysiology of RA [4]. Among the vast family of PLA2 enzymes, which includes three cellular (cPLA2) isoforms and 10 secretory PLA2 (sPLA2) isoforms (IB, IIA, IIC, IID, IIE, IIF, III, V, X, and XII), group IIA secretory phospholipase (sPLA2-IIA) is proinflammatory in vivo [5]. It is an attractive target in RA because it releases arachidonic acid from cell membranes under some conditions, enhances cytokine induction of prostaglandin (PGE) production, and is associated with enhanced release of IL-6 [6]. Proinflammatory cytokines and sPLA2 potentiate each other's synthesis, thereby creating an amplification loop for propagation of inflammatory responses [7]. Hence, inhibition of sPLA2 may logically block the formation of a wide variety of secondary inflammatory mediators. In our search for such an inhibitor, we designed a 17-residue peptide (P-NT.II) using the parent structure of the protein termed Phospholipase Inhibitor from Python serum (PIP) [8,9]. We have already shown proof of the concept that this small molecule sPLA2 inhibitory peptide P-NT.II has a disease-modifying effect particularly evident on cartilage and bone erosion with eventual protection against joint destruction [10]. In our recent study, we designed several analogs of P-NT.II and their inhibitory activity was evaluated by in vitro inhibition assays against a purified human synovial sPLA2 enzyme. Using cell-based assays, gene and protein expression analyses, along with nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular modeling-based investigations, we have demonstrated that a linear 18-residue peptide PIP-18 potently inhibits IL-1β-induced secretions of sPLA2 and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs; 1, 2, 3, and 9) in RA synovial fibroblasts (SF), at protein and mRNA levels [11]. As sPLA2 [2,4] and MMPs [12] have been proposed to play a significant role in RA etiology, such peptide inhibitors may be effective and beneficial for the treatment of RA. However, despite their potential utility in human diseases, both inhibitors have limited efficacy in RA to date [13-15]. Improvements in therapeutic benefit may be achieved by targeting both sPLA2 and MMPs. Here, we extended our study to examine the therapeutic efficacy of PIP-18 on a clinically relevant TNF-driven transgenic mouse model of human RA [16], and to study the possible mechanism of peptide inhibition of the inflammatory pathway in human RA SF. Materials and methods Clinical specimens Synovial tissues were collected from the knee joints of RA (n = 5) or osteoarthritis (OA; n = 5) patients at total knee-replacement surgery and used for primary cultures within one hour after collection. Informed consent was taken from the patients with RA or OA who were diagnosed according to the 1987 revised clinical criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [17]. All samples were collected at the National University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University of Singapore, according to the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board. Synovial fibroblast cell cultures SF cells were isolated from the tissues by enzymatic digestion with 1 mg/ml of collagenase II (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA) for 20 minutes at 37°C, and cultured under standard conditions (37°C/5% carbon dioxide (CO2)) in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml of penicillin, and 100 mg/ml of streptomycin (Gibco-BRL products, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Cells were passaged by trypsin digestion and split at a ratio of 1:3. Confirmation of more than 90% purity of SF cell populations at passages three and onwards involved staining for prolyl 4 hydroxylase (5B5 antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. Cells were washed and plated in DMEM, and only passages three to five were used in our cell-based studies. For experiments, confluent SF cells were serum-starved overnight and the medium was then replaced with fresh serum-free DMEM containing 0.5% sterile-filtered, cell culture grade BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as a carrier protein. Three different doses (1, 5, or 10 μM) of PIP-18 were examined to find the peptide concentration that showed maximal inhibitory effect on IL-1β-induced sPLA2 production. SF cells were preincubated for one hour with 5 μM of PIP-18, a selective sPLA2 inhibitor LY315920 (Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA), MMP Inhibitor II (Merck Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore), or with vehicle (0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)), and then stimulated with 10 ng/ml of human recombinant (hr)IL-1β (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) for 24 hours. SFs cultured without IL-1β or the peptide served as controls. Cell viability assays XTT (Sodium 3'- [Phenyl amine carboxyl)-3, 4-tetrazolium]-bis (4-methoxy-nitro) benzene sulfonic acid hydrate) Cell Proliferation Kit II (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used to assess the possible cytotoxic effect of the peptides on the human RA/OA SF cells. Immunoassays and cell-based ELISA RA/OA SF samples were centrifuged briefly, and supernatants were stored at -20°C until used. To assess the concentration of secreted proteins, supernatants of RA/OA SF primary cultures were analyzed in triplicate, using commercially available kits for sPLA2 (sPLA2 human type IIA enzyme-linked immunoassay kit, Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA), MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 and -2 (RayBiotech, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA). Analysis of serum levels of human TNFα and murine IL-6 was undertaken using ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) proteins was examined using SuperArray CASE™ cell-based ELISA kit [18], and specific MAPK inhibitors (p38 inhibitor SB202190, Erk inhibitor PD98059, and Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) inhibitor SP600125 (all from SuperArray Bioscience Corporation, Frederick, MD, USA) as positive controls. Escherichia coli-based sPLA2 assay Mouse serum sPLA2 levels were measured as described [10] with minor modifications. Briefly, reaction mixtures (250 μl) containing 25 mM CaCl2-100 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5) assay buffer, [3H] arachidonate-labeled Escherichia coli membrane (5.8 μCi/μmol, PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Inc, MA, USA) suspension in assay buffer (about 10,000 counts per minute (cpm)) and 10 μl of the serum diluted (1:50) in assay buffer containing 0.1% fatty-acid-free BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were incubated for one hour at 37°C. The reaction was terminated with 750 μl of chilled PBS containing 0.1% fatty-acid-free BSA. The undigested substrate was pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 g for five minutes, and aliquots (500 μl) of the supernatant taken for measurement of the amount of [3H] arachidonate released from the E. coli membrane using liquid scintillation counting (LS 6500 Scintillation Counter; Beckman Inc., CA, USA). Standard assay conditions were set up prior to sPLA2 determination in mouse serum. The linear range for sPLA2-containing mouse serum was first established by serial dilution of pooled mouse serum, while that of the standard curve was determined with the purified secreted sPLA2-IIA human recombinant protein (GenWay Biotech, Inc., CA, USA). To find out any possible influence of the serum components on sPLA2 standard curve, a fixed volume of 1:50 diluted mouse serum was added into varying amounts (1 to 200 ng/ml) of purified sPLA2 standard before the assay. Diluting the mouse serum samples by at least 50-fold with the assay buffer containing 0.1% fatty-acid-free BSA attained a linearity range of 1 to 80 ng/ml of sPLA2. The amount of sPLA2 present in the serum was calculated from the standard curve (ng/ml sPLA2 on X-axis versus cpm/ml on Y-axis) and is expressed as ng/ml ± standard error of the mean. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR After removal of supernatants for protein assays, the remaining SF cells were washed with cold PBS, and pooled (n = 3 flasks) for each group: - IL-1β, + IL-1β, IL-1β + PIP-18, IL-1β + LY315920, and IL-1β + MMP II. Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy® mini kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), subsequently treated with RNase-free Dnase-I (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) at 25°C for 20 minutes, and stored at -80°C until used. The quality (A260/A280 ratio = 1.9 to 2.1) and quantity of extracted RNA were determined by spectrophotometry (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Reverse transcription of RNA, amplification, detection of DNA, data acquisition, primer design, and quantitative real-time PCR analysis were all performed as described [19]. PCR primers (forward/reverse) for sPLA2-IIA, MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 1st BASE Pvt. Ltd., Singapore) were as follows: (5'-AAGGAAGCCGCACTCAGTTA-3')/(5'-GGCAGCAGCCTTATCACACT-3'); (5'-AC-AGCTTCCCAGCGACTCTA-3')/(5'-CAGGGTTTCAGCATCTGGTT-3'); (5'-TTGACGGTAAGGACGGACTC-3')/(5'-ACTTGCAGTACTCCCCATCG-3'); (5'-GAGGACACCAGCATGAACCT-3')/(5'-CACCTCCAGAG-TGTCGGAGT-3'); 5'-CTCGAACTTTGACAGCGACA-3'/5'-CCCTCAGTGAAGCGGTACAT-3'; 5'-TGACA-TCCGGT TCGTCTACA-3'/5'-CACTGTGCATTCCTCACAGC-3'; 5'-GATGCACATCACCCTCTGTG-3'/5'-GTGCCCGTTGATGTTCTTCT-3'; 5'-CAAGGTCATCCACGACCACT-3'/5'-CCAGTGAGTTTCCCGTTCAG-3'. GAPDH expression was used as an internal calibrator for equal RNA loading and to normalize relative expression data for all other genes analyzed. The real-time PCR data were quantified using relative quantification (2-ΔΔCT) method [20]. Experimental animals Heterozygous human TNF-transgenic mice (strain Tg197; in a mixed genetic background C57BL/6xCBA), bred and maintained in the animal facility at the Biomedical Sciences Research Centre, Fleming, Greece, were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the peptide PIP-18 as compared with other drugs. In these mice, a chronic inflammatory and destructive polyarthritis develops within three to four weeks after birth [21]. All mouse procedures were conducted in compliance with the institutional guidelines. Drugs used in animal studies Methotrexate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), infliximab (Remicade, Schering-Plough Labo N.V., Belgium), celecoxib (Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA), and antiflammin-2 (custom synthetised peptide) were used as comparators to the lead anti-inflammatory peptide P-NT.II and optimized analog PIP-18. All peptides were custom synthesized by AnaSpec, Inc, San Jose, CA, USA, at a purity of more than 95%. Drug treatment Ten weight-matched groups of Tg197 mice (n = 8 per group; statistically calculated with a power (1 - β) of 90% and a significance level (α) of 5%) were injected intraperitoneally (three times a week for five weeks) with various drugs at age three weeks (arthritis onset). Two different doses (10 and 30 mg/kg) were used to examine the effect of peptides (P-NT.II and PIP-18) on experimental arthritis. Except for methotrexate, which was used at a lower dose of 1 mg/kg due to its higher toxicity, doses of 10 mg/kg were used for infliximab, celecoxib, and antiflammin-2 peptide (AF-2). These doses were selected according to those prespecified in the available literature and according to our studies of other rodents in in vivo models [21-24]. Clinical and histopathologic assessments Body weight and arthritic scores (AS) were recorded weekly for each mouse. Evaluation of arthritis in ankle joints was peformed in a blinded manner using a semiquantitative AS ranging from 0 to 3 as described previously [10]. At eight weeks of age all mice were killed by CO2 inhalation, and the hind ankle joints removed for histology. Histologic processing, scoring and analytical assessments of ankle joints are carried out basically, as previously described [10,21]. Statistical analysis Unless otherwise indicated, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) single-factor test was used to evaluate group means of continuous variables. If the ANOVA single-factor test was significant, a post hoc test was performed using a Bonferroni's correction. Analyses were performed using Prism statistical software (GraphPad Prism version 4.01, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Results Composition of RA and OA synovial fibroblasts Table 1 shows that an average of 75% of the RA and OA SF cells at the first passage were fibroblasts (Prolyl-4-hydroxylase +; mAb 5B5, Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) and 15% were macrophages (CD14+; mAb Tyk4, Dako, Hamburg, Germany), while T cells (CD-3+; mAb UCHT-1, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and B cells (CD 20+; mAb B-Ly1, Dako, Hamburg, Germany) represent less than 1% of the SF cells. Starting from the third passage and onwards, on average approximately 99% of the SF cells were fibroblasts, with very few (< 1%) contaminating macrophages, T cells and B-cells detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.
Suppression of secreted sPLA2 and MMPs The suppressive effect of PIP-18, LY315920 [25] and MMP inhibitor II [26] on IL-1β-stimulated sPLA2 and MMP protein expression was examined in human RA and OA SF cultures. The peptide used at 1 to 10 μM was nontoxic to the cells after 24 hours treatment, and hence 5 μM (IC50 of PIP-18) was applied in our cell-based assays to study its effect. The release of sPLA2-IIA in the medium by unstimulated cells was barely detectable, but was markedly increased by nearly 10-fold and 8-fold by IL-stimulated RA and OA SF cells, respectively. Elevated sPLA2 production was significantly suppressed more by PIP-18 (***P < 0.001) than LY315920 (**P < 0.01), while MMP inhibitor II was the least (*P < 0.05) effective (Figure (Figure1a).1a
Suppression of sPLA2 and MMP transcription Quantitative RT-PCR was used to assess relative mRNA expression levels of IL-1β-induced human RA SF in the presence and absence of PIP-18 (Figure (Figure3).3
PIP-18-mediated inhibitory effect is signaled through p38 MAPK The phosphorylation status of MAPK proteins in IL-1β-stimulated RA SF cells before and after treatment with the peptide or specific MAPK inhibitors is shown in Figure Figure4a.4a
The effects of sPLA2 inhibitors (PIP-18 and LY315920) and MAPK inhibitors (SB202190, PD98059, SP600125) on IL-1β-induced MMP and sPLA2 production by RA SF are shown in Figure Figure4b.4b Impact of PIP-18 on arthritis progression The clinical effect was assessed based on the body weight gain and the degree of swelling and deformation of the ankle joints of Tg197 mice. As compared with untreated or vehicle-treated mice, only the groups that received 30 mg/kg of PIP-18 and 10 mg/kg of infliximab had significant increase (P < 0.05 relative to untreated animals) in body weights at eight weeks of age, while the remaining groups of mice did not show any significant weight gain during the five-week study course (Figure (Figure5a5a
AS obtained during the five-week-treatment period (Figure (Figure5b)5b Histopathologic evidence of peptide-mediated disease modulation Synovitis and joint histopathology as shown in the representative tissue sections from Tg197 ankle joints (Figure (Figure6)6
PIP-18 modulates joint inflammation and bone destruction more favorably than DMARDs Administration of PIP-18 at doses of 30 mg/kg three times per week for five weeks in Tg197 mice resulted in a significant reduction (**P < 0.01) in all three analytical histopathologic scores (synovitis, cartilage destruction and bone erosion) as compared with those of untreated Tg197 mice, which all developed synovitis with severe articular cartilage degradation and bone erosions (Figures (Figures7a7a
Serum levels of sPLA2 and proinflammatory cytokines Compared with untreated or vehicle-treated Tg197 mice, serum levels of murine sPLA2 and IL-6, (msPLA2, mIL-6), and human TNF (hTNF-α) decreased significantly (*P < 0.05 vs untreated) at five-week post-treatment with 30 mg/kg PIP-18 (Figure (Figure8).8
Discussion Despite the initial success seen with the use of small molecule inhibitors of sPLA2 and MMPs in animal models [28,29], interests in their therapeutic potential have been mitigated by undesirable side effects [30] and a lack of efficacy [13,14,31] observed in later clinical trials. Compared with MMP inhibitors, sPLA2 inhibitors have a better safety profile, but have limited efficacy in clinical studies [14,15]. One of the potential reasons for the failure of LY333013 may be incomplete inactivation of sPLA2 in the SF due to inadequate dose of the inhibitor used in the trial [32]. As sPLA2 and MMP inhibitors have limited efficacy in RA, the use of an inhibitor that can target both sPLA2 and MMP could be advantageous. In our study, inhibition of sPLA2 production and mRNA expression is reflected by a significant decrease of sPLA2 enzymatic activity in IL-induced RA SF cells pretreated with PIP-18. In contrast to LY315920, a small molecule that binds directly to the sPLA2 active site for inhibition [33], a 2000 Dalton PIP-18 peptide is proposed to bind to the hydrophobic binding pocket near the N-terminal helix of sPLA2 [11]. PIP-18 has two putative pharmacophores for binding more than one molecule of sPLA2, and this may account for its relatively stronger suppressive effect on sPLA2 transcription and translation as compared with that of LY315920. The strong inhibitory effect of PIP-18 on enzymatic activity as well as protein and mRNA expression of sPLA2 may perhaps be a unique feature of this peptide. It inhibited more than 70% of sPLA2 secretion and more than 90% of mRNA expression in IL-induced RA SF cells, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of PIP-18 on sPLA2 occurs at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. To provide a comprehensive picture of the inhibitory effect of different inhibitors on cytokine-stimulated expression of sPLA2 and MMP genes and secreted proteins in RA and OA SF cells, we acknowledge here that part of the data previously published elsewhere [11] have been incorporated in Figures Figures11 In normal human synoviocytes, sPLA2-IIA steady-state mRNA is inducible by IL-1 [4], whereas in human RA SF, IL-1-β does not appear to induce sPLA2-IIA protein and enzyme activity [34]. The data on sPLA2-IIA steady-state mRNA reported herein are conclusive because they are obtained with very sensitive quantitative RT-PCR techniques, thus confirming our finding that sPLA2-IIA mRNA is indeed inducible by IL-1 in cultured human RA and OA SF cells. Although our data appears to be at odds with the previous report [34], the relevance of our data on IL-induced sPLA2-IIA protein secretion in RA SF cells may be supported by the fact that sPLA2-IIA protein is detectable by immunofluorescence in synovial fibroblast cells from RA patients [35]. As sPLA2 has previously been suggested as a regulator of MMP activation [36], the effect of PIP-18 on MMPs seems only secondary to sPLA2 inhibition. The suppressive effect of PIP-18 on sPLA2 and MMP transcription found in IL-induced RA SF (Figure (Figure3)3 Of note, some differences between PIP-18 and LY315920 are evident with respect to their ability to suppress different MMPs in IL-1β-induced RA SF (Figure (Figure4b).4b The possible mechanism by which PIP-18 peptide suppresses cytokine-stimulated expression of sPLA2 and MMP genes and secreted proteins is depicted in Figure Figure9.9
Based on well-known pathways (as indicated by solid lines in Figure Figure9),9 Besides, it is also possible that blocking p38 MAPK activity by PIP-18 may diminish cPLA2-α production, resulting in reduced AA required for PGE generation. cPLA2-α dependence of PGE2 production in IL-1β-stimulated RA SF has previously been reported [34]. Studies in sPLA2-transfected HEK293 cells [51] and mesangial cells from cPLA2-α-deficient mice [52] suggest that sPLA2 can act along with cPLA2-α to maximize arachidonate release and increased PGE2 synthesis. A functional cross-talk between cPLA2-α and sPLA2-IIA in IL-induced RA SF cells, such as that observed in other cell types [51-53], may signify the importance of sPLA2 relative to cPLA2 induction in cytokine-stimulated RA SF cells and its inhibition by PIP-18 for RA treatment. Further work would be of benefit to determine whether these mechanisms occur. The hTNF Tg197 model [16] used in this study is a clinically relevant model recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration for screening potential RA candidate drugs [54]. As compared with PIP-18, methotrexate and celecoxib are less potent; being able to suppress only synovitis, but not cartilage destruction and bone erosion to a significant extent. Because the efficacy of methotrexate is influenced by genetic factors, the reduced responsiveness of Tg197 mice to methotrexate may be related to adaptive immunity in arthritis development [21]. Ineffectiveness of methotrexate has previously been reported for Tg197 mice [21] and other arthritis animal models [22,55]. In contrast to the protective effect of celecoxib seen in various murine arthritis models [24,56], we did not find any reduction in the clinical scores of celecoxib-treated Tg197 mice, which express high levels of TNF mRNA and protein in their inflamed joints [16] and circulation [57]. Inhibition of COX-2 by celecoxib may exacerbate TNF production as a result of an imbalanced rise in thromboxane A2 relative to PGE2 levels [58], and the corresponding surge in TNF levels may provide an explanation for the reduced efficacy seen in Tg197 mice with celecoxib treatment. AF-2, a 9-mer PLA2 inhibitory peptide derived from uteroglobin and annexin-1 amino acid sequences, shows potent anti-inflammatory activity in diverse animal models [59]. In Tg197 mice, it significantly (P < 0.05) moderates histopathologic score of synovitis, cartilage destruction and bone erosion (Figure (Figure7),7 It has been reported that TNF stimulates sPLA2-IIA gene expression and secretion by different transcriptional activation pathways [61]. High levels of TNF expressed in the inflamed joints of Tg197 mice [16] could facilitate sPLA2 expression and secretion, and amplify the available pool of sPLA2 that is highly expressed in the articular cartilage and chondrocytes of RA joints [62,63]. However, it should be noted that this speculation is based on the results obtained with murine mesangial cells [61], and may not be directly related to human SF cells. Besides stimulating sPLA2-IIA production, TNF is also capable of inducing cartilage catabolism via increased MMP expression and activation [64]. In Tg197 mice, PIP-18 significantly reduced serum levels of msPLA2, mIL-6, and hTNF-α as compared with untreated or vehicle-treated control animals. Considering that PIP-18 significantly reduces serum TNF-α levels in Tg197 mice, the possibility that MMP gene expression could also be an indirect effect of PIP-18 through suppression of TNF production should also be taken into account. From the data, it is plausible to suggest that PIP-18 suppresses p38 MAPK phosphorylation that in turn suppresses TNF production because cytokine production is regulated significantly by p38 MAPK, whereas MMP production is regulated both by p38 MAPK and JNK. It has been reported that blockade of TNF leads to a reduction of osteoclast numbers and enhanced osteoblast numbers [65]. Hence, the PIP-18 peptide may be a potential agent for preventing pathologic bone loss. Experimental studies to verify whether the peptide directly affects osteoclast precursor cells to suppress their differentiation to mature osteoclasts are currently underway. Although LY315920 and MMP-II inhibitors used in this study are well defined [25,26] and have been extensively used in several studies [29,30,66,67], the former is known for its varying potency for several isoforms of sPLA2 [28], while the latter is a broad-spectrum metalloproteinase inhibitor [26]. Hence, data obtained with such pharmacological agents should be interpreted with caution. Conclusions In conclusion, our data show that PIP-18 significantly inhibits sPLA2-IIA enzymatic activity and downregulates sPLA2-IIA and MMPs (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9) at both the transcript and the protein level in IL1-β-induced RA SF cells via attenuation of p38 MAPK phosphorylation. Treatment of TNF-driven Tg197 transgenic mice with PIP-18 significantly modulates disease progression by suppressing arthritis indicators (synovitis, cartilage and bone erosion) as well as circulatory levels of murine sPLA2, IL-6, and human TNF-α. The in vitro and in vivo preclinical data available from the present study thus validate the potential of this peptide as RA therapeutics. Abbreviations AF-2: antiflammin-2; ANOVA: analysis of variance; AS: arthritis score; BSA: bovine serum albumin; cPLA2: cytosolic phospholipase A2; cpm: counts per minute; DMARD: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug; DMEM: Dulbecco's modified eagle medium; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FBS: fetal bovine serum; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; hr: human recombinant; IL: interleukin; JNK: Jun N-terminal Kinase; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; MMP-II: matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor-II; NF: nuclear factor; OA: osteoarthritis; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; PGE: prostaglandin; PIP: phospholipase inhibitor from python; PLA2: phospholipase A2; RT-PCR: real-time polymerase chain reaction; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; sPLA2-IIA: secretory phospholipase A2-group IIA; SF: synovial fibroblast; TIMP: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TNF: tumor necrosis factor. Competing interests PG, M-MT, PVK and PA are all employees of the National University of Singapore, which supports the research project and finances this manuscript (including the article-processing charge). ED and GK are employees of the Institute of Immunology, Biomedical Sciences Research Center, Greece. PG and M-MT have applied for the patents relating to the content of this manuscript: Phospholipase A2-inhibitory peptide with anti-arthritic and neuroprotective activities (US Patent: 7,176,281); Methods and Compositions for Treatment of Arthritis and Cancer. US Patent Application: 20070037253 Filed: April 28, 2006 and is now under examination). PVK, PA, ED and GK declare that they have no further financial competing interests. All authors declare that they have no non-financial competing interests. Authors' contributions M-MT carried out all aspects of the study, including the initial study design, experimental work, data analyses, graphics, and wrote the manuscript. ED was substantially involved in the coordination of the study, participated in animal experiments, and also in the layout and reviewing of the manuscript. PA performed the real-time PCR and cell-based assays, and participated in respective data analyses. GK established the Tg197 arthritis model and provided logistical support and intellectual contributions. PVK performed preclinical analyses and provided clinical specimens. PG contributed to conception and design of the project, and organized for collaborative research with ED and KG, discussed the data with the first author M-MT, and provided intellectual contributions. Acknowledgements We thank Mr. Nikos Giannakas, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre, Institute of Immunology, Fleming, Greece, for assistance with the Tg197 mice experiments, and Dr. B. Susithra, Department of Anatomy, National University of Singapore, for histology. This study was funded by the Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB), Biomedical Sciences Proof-of-Concept Scheme (POC project S05/1-25277273) and supported by the National University of Singapore (Grant No: R-181-000-087-414). References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
JAMA. 2006 May 17; 295(19):2275-85.
[JAMA. 2006]Lancet. 2007 Dec 1; 370(9602):1861-74.
[Lancet. 2007]Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Nov; 62 Suppl 2():ii43-7.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2003]FEBS J. 2005 Feb; 272(3):655-72.
[FEBS J. 2005]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Nov; 1761(11):1373-82.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Nov; 1761(11):1289-300.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003 Jul; 131(3):153-63.
[Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003]Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jun; 150(4):427-33.
[Exp Brain Res. 2003]Biochemistry. 2000 Aug 8; 39(31):9604-11.
[Biochemistry. 2000]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(3):R282-94.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]J Med Chem. 2007 Nov 29; 50(24):5938-50.
[J Med Chem. 2007]Lancet. 2007 Dec 1; 370(9602):1861-74.
[Lancet. 2007]FEBS J. 2005 Feb; 272(3):655-72.
[FEBS J. 2005]Front Biosci. 2006 Jan 1; 11():529-43.
[Front Biosci. 2006]Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Nov; 60 Suppl 3():iii62-7.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2001]Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar; 31(3):718-28.
[Crit Care Med. 2003]Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar; 31(3):315-24.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1988]Biochem J. 2000 Sep 15; 350 Pt 3():717-22.
[Biochem J. 2000]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(3):R282-94.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]Toxicon. 2005 Dec 15; 46(8):883-99.
[Toxicon. 2005]Methods. 2001 Dec; 25(4):402-8.
[Methods. 2001]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(1):R65-R72.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(1):R65-R72.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Jan-Feb; 23(1):63-70.
[Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(3):R282-94.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(1):R65-R72.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Mar; 288(3):1117-24.
[J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999]J Med Chem. 1998 Sep 10; 41(19):3568-71.
[J Med Chem. 1998]J Med Chem. 2007 Nov 29; 50(24):5938-50.
[J Med Chem. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 8; 102(10):3697-702.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Curr Pharm Des. 2005; 11(10):1301-12.
[Curr Pharm Des. 2005]Curr Pharm Des. 2007; 13(3):333-46.
[Curr Pharm Des. 2007]Curr Pharm Des. 2007; 13(20):2087-100.
[Curr Pharm Des. 2007]Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Nov; 60 Suppl 3():iii62-7.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2001]J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar; 32(3):417-23.
[J Rheumatol. 2005]Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Jun; 2(6):458-65.
[Nat Struct Biol. 1995]J Med Chem. 2007 Nov 29; 50(24):5938-50.
[J Med Chem. 2007]FEBS J. 2005 Feb; 272(3):655-72.
[FEBS J. 2005]Arthritis Rheum. 1994 May; 37(5):653-61.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1994]J Immunol. 2000 Sep 1; 165(5):2790-7.
[J Immunol. 2000]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Feb 24; 340(4):1278-83.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006]Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Apr; 47(4):409-14.
[Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008]Front Biosci. 2006 Jan 1; 11():529-43.
[Front Biosci. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 22; 274(4):2446-55.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2004 Sep 17; 279(38):39513-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Oct 12; 362(1):200-5.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007]Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Nov; 63(11):1453-9.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2004]Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9(6):223.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2007]Enzyme Protein. 1996; 49(1-3):7-19.
[Enzyme Protein. 1996]FEBS J. 2005 Feb; 272(3):655-72.
[FEBS J. 2005]J Immunol. 2000 Sep 1; 165(5):2790-7.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2001 Aug 31; 276(35):33156-64.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Apr; 47(4):409-14.
[Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008]Arthritis Res. 2002; 4(3):157-64.
[Arthritis Res. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2005 Jul 8; 280(27):25830-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Arthritis Res Ther. 2008; 10(1):201.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2008]Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Sep; 54(9):2745-56.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2006]Arthritis Rheum. 1994 May; 37(5):653-61.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1994]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 11; 279(24):25024-38.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 27; 278(26):24153-63.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Oct 18; 1348(3):257-72.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997]EMBO J. 1991 Dec; 10(13):4025-31.
[EMBO J. 1991]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(1):R65-R72.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9(5):R113.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2007]Eur J Pharmacol. 2005 Jan 4; 506(3):285-95.
[Eur J Pharmacol. 2005]Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Jan-Feb; 23(1):63-70.
[Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 923():147-53.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000]Arthritis Res Ther. 2004; 6(1):R65-R72.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2004]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr; 56(4):1164-74.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 8; 278(32):29799-812.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]EMBO J. 1991 Dec; 10(13):4025-31.
[EMBO J. 1991]J Rheumatol. 1995 Nov; 22(11):2114-9.
[J Rheumatol. 1995]Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004; 42(6):602-10.
[Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004]Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Oct; 48(10):2845-54.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2003]