• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2009; 4(12): e8154.
Published online Dec 4, 2009. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0008154
PMCID: PMC2781550

Global MYCN Transcription Factor Binding Analysis in Neuroblastoma Reveals Association with Distinct E-Box Motifs and Regions of DNA Hypermethylation

Joseph Najbauer, Editor

Abstract

Background

Neuroblastoma, a cancer derived from precursor cells of the sympathetic nervous system, is a major cause of childhood cancer related deaths. The single most important prognostic indicator of poor clinical outcome in this disease is genomic amplification of MYCN, a member of a family of oncogenic transcription factors.

Methodology

We applied MYCN chromatin immunoprecipitation to microarrays (ChIP-chip) using MYCN amplified/non-amplified cell lines as well as a conditional knockdown cell line to determine the distribution of MYCN binding sites within all annotated promoter regions.

Conclusion

Assessment of E-box usage within consistently positive MYCN binding sites revealed a predominance for the CATGTG motif (p<0.0016), with significant enrichment of additional motifs CATTTG, CATCTG, CAACTG in the MYCN amplified state. For cell lines over-expressing MYCN, gene ontology analysis revealed enrichment for the binding of MYCN at promoter regions of numerous molecular functional groups including DNA helicases and mRNA transcriptional regulation. In order to evaluate MYCN binding with respect to other genomic features, we determined the methylation status of all annotated CpG islands and promoter sequences using methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP). The integration of MYCN ChIP-chip and MeDIP data revealed a highly significant positive correlation between MYCN binding and DNA hypermethylation. This association was also detected in regions of hemizygous loss, indicating that the observed association occurs on the same homologue. In summary, these findings suggest that MYCN binding occurs more commonly at CATGTG as opposed to the classic CACGTG E-box motif, and that disease associated over expression of MYCN leads to aberrant binding to additional weaker affinity E-box motifs in neuroblastoma. The co-localization of MYCN binding and DNA hypermethylation further supports the dual role of MYCN, namely that of a classical transcription factor affecting the activity of individual genes, and that of a mediator of global chromatin structure.

Introduction

MYCN is one member of a family of oncogenic transcription factors that also include c-MYC and MYCL. These proteins bind DNA in a sequence specific manner in order to regulate normal growth and differentiation during development [1]. The myc gene family is only a subset of a much larger super family of genes that encodes DNA binding basic helix-loop-helix proteins (bHLH). Proteins containing the bHLH motif are known to be involved in a diverse range of cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation and morphogenesis. bHLH proteins can bind DNA as homodimers, but heterodimerization with other bHLH proteins has been shown to dramatically increase DNA binding efficiency [2].

High level genomic amplification of the MYCN gene occurs in approximately 20 to 25% of neuroblastoma (NB), a highly genetically heterogeneous childhood cancer derived from precursor cells of the sympathetic nervous system. MYCN amplification is the single most important prognostic indicator of poor clinical outcome [3]. Currently, patients with MYCN amplified neuroblastoma tumors have less than a 30% chance of 5-year survival, thus identification of downstream MYCN targets is critically important for the development of alternative treatment regimens and improving patient survival.

Analysis of gene expression in NB cell lines where MYCN levels can be experimentally manipulated have identified many genes and miRNA sequences whose expression is altered in response to changes in MYCN levels [4][6]. Distinguishing direct versus indirect effects based on expression profiling, however, is difficult since MYCN regulates other transcription factors as well as regulatory RNAs such as miRNAs. A number of studies have used techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to experimentally confirm MYCN binding to the promoter regions of specific genes [7][9], and more recent studies have identified MYCN binding sites in proximity to miRNA promoter regions [10]. Analysis of the relationship between MYCN binding and expression of the target gene sequence, however, is not straightforward, as MYCN binding throughout the genome is far more ubiquitous than previously realized, with large numbers of intergenic binding sites indicating a more general role for MYCN in maintaining euchromatin structure that is independent of its role in regulating the expression of specific genes [11].

Here, we have performed MYCN ChIP-chip studies on NB cell lines using a set of microarrays containing all annotated human gene promoter regions, as well as a custom tiling array covering selected miRNA loci and intergenic regions. Assessment of E-box usage and gene ontology enrichment analysis was carried out on identified MYCN binding sites. Finally, using methylation dependent immunoprecipitation (MeDIP), we also determine the overall methylation status of MYCN binding sites and observed a striking correlation between MYCN binding and DNA hypermethylation status in the neuroblastoma cell lines studied.

Results

To identify high confidence MYCN transcription factor binding sites within promoter sequences across the genome, we performed ChIP-chip using two antibodies that were reported in previous MYCN ChIP-chip or ChIP-Seq studies, namely NCMII-100 [11] and B84b [12], [13]. Given that these mouse monoclonal antibodies are raised against different epitopes of the MYCN protein, we reasoned that MYCN binding sites identified independently by both antibodies are more likely to be genuine. A pair-wise comparison of log2 ratios from ChIP-chip experiments using the NB cell line Kelly, revealed a good correlation across experiments (R = 0.8) between independent antibodies, confirming that this approach was able to reproducibly detect MYCN binding sites (Figure S1A and B ).

Characterisation of MYCN Transcription Factor Binding Sites

ChIP-chip assays were performed on NB cell lines comprising a MYCN amplified (Kelly), non MYCN amplified (SK-N-AS) and a constitutively over-expressing MYCN cell line SHEP-21N which contains a MYCN trans-gene under the control of a tetracycline responsive repressor element [14] [referred hereafter as SHEP-untreated (high levels of MYCN) and SHEP-treated (low expression of MYCN), as illustrated in Figure S1 C and D]. A number of previously reported MYCN targets were positive for MYCN binding in our ChIP-chip experiments, confirming the validity of our two antibody approach, including NME2 [13], [15], CRABP-II [16], ZNF259 [11], LIF [17] and members of the mini-chromosome maintenance gene family [8]. Figure 1A illustrates MYCN binding to one of these previously published positive MYCN binding sites, NME2. Additional validation for the enrichment of MYCN in the antibody precipitated fraction was also obtained through qPCR based analysis of binding sites (Figure S2). The level of enrichment (~2 to 4 fold) was similar to other transcription factors such as ZNF217 [18] and other MYCN semi-quantitative PCR validation experiments carried out by other groups [11], [13], consistent with the assertion that MYCN binds with a weak affinity to promoter sequences.

Figure 1
MYCN ChIP-chip.

Figure 1B summarises the total number of MYCN peaks identified using the two independent MYCN antibodies and the proportion of shared peaks across the respective cell lines analysed using the NimbleGen 2-array promoter set. The total number of MYCN peaks identified in the various cell lines was generally consistent with the level of MYCN expression (Figure S1C–E). The MYCN amplified (MNA) cell line Kelly displayed 1,142 more positive MYCN peaks than the non-amplified cell line SK-N-AS, while sharing 38% of MYCN peaks [Fig. 1B(i)]. In addition, treating the SHEP cell line with doxycycline (dox) resulted in the reduction of MYCN peaks by 52% [Fig. 1B(ii)]. This reduction in the number of MYCN peaks is in contrast to a previous ChIP-chip study using a similar knockdown strategy for MYCN which observed a 99% decrease in the number of MYCN peaks [11]; however such differences in the decreased levels of MYCN binding may be due to experimental variations in the ChIP design, protocols and/or array designs used as well as the nature and extent of the loci studied.

Interestingly, the percentage overlap of positive MYCN peaks between Kelly and SHEP treated (20%) increased dramatically to 75% with MYCN over expression in SHEP untreated [Fig. 1B(iii & iv)], confirming that the over expression of MYCN in the SHEP-based system results in a binding pattern which has a high degree of similarity to that of a MNA cell line such as Kelly. In general, the low expressing MYCN cell lines (SK-N-AS & SHEP-treated) displayed a similar number of MYCN peaks, although when compared to each other only shared 25% of peaks [Fig. 1B(v)]. The overlap of MYCN binding sites between NB cell lines displayed in Figure 1B was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). This was determined using the expected peak overlap frequency given the number of peaks retrieved in the individual ChIP-chip experiments and the number of regions on the microarray. Fisher's Exact Test was then used to calculate the P-value for each overlap based on the actual versus the expected frequencies. ChIP-chip reactions performed with Dyna-beads only and an isotype matched IgG mouse antibody using the 2-array promoter set and/or custom tiled arrays resulted in only random, minimal overlap with positive MYCN peaks (average overlap of 5.8%), indicating that the vast majority of the MYCN peaks were not artifactually generated. In order to study the distribution of MYCN binding around promoter sequences, identified peaks were plotted in relation to the distance from their annotated transcription start sites for the cell lines studied (Figure 2A). The distribution of MYCN sites was generally consistent across cell lines; however, upon treatment with dox the SHEP cell line displayed an inward shift towards the transcriptional start site, suggesting that both qualitative and quantitative changes in MYCN binding occur upon dox treatment. Results confirm that the majority of MYCN binding (average 80%) falls within −3kb to +1kb of the transcriptional start site, which is consistent with previous studies for MYCN and c-MYC [11], [19].

Figure 2
Distribution of MYCN transcription factor binding and E-box preference.

E-box Usage in Neuroblastoma

E-box preference for putative MYCN binding within both the MYCN amplified and non-amplified NB cell lines was assessed by examining occurrences of all possible variants of the generic E-box motif, CANNTG, within MYCN positive sites relative to the background sequence on the promoter microarrays. Significance was assessed using p-values derived from Fisher's Exact test. For this, we initially focussed on highly consistent MYCN binding sites common to all NB cell lines used in the study. A subset of 265 sites, which were below the selected false discovery rate (FDR) threshold in each cell line, were selected as the representative set of MYCN binding sites and subjected to further examination (Table S1). As illustrated in Figure 2B, the most significantly over-represented motifs were CATGTG (p = 0.0016) and CAACTG (p = 0.032), while the motif CATTTG (p = 0.014) was significantly under-represented. Next, we assessed if a shift occurred in E-box preference between the MYCN-amplified state, in which MYCN is highly expressed, and the non-amplified state, which would help explain the mechanism of oncogenesis induced by MYCN amplification. We examined the occurrence of the various E-box motifs within MYCN binding sites that were found exclusively in the MYCN amplified state. As displayed in Figure 2C, we observed a significant enrichment of additional motifs CATTTG, CATCTG, CAACTG, potentially indicating that MYCN binding becomes less specific when it is highly abundant. A similar enrichment was observed when plotting the frequency of E-box motifs against raw fluorescent ratios in the Kelly (Figure 2D) and SK-N-AS (Figure S3) NB cell lines.

Putative MYCN Function in Neuroblastoma

In order to identify sets of biological processes regulated by MYCN, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis [20], [21] was performed using the subset of 265 sites common to all NB cell lines. A total of 270 genes map within a region 3 kb upstream and 1 kb downstream of these 265 MYCN peaks. This group of genes was significantly enriched for genes involved in mRNA transcriptional regulation (n = 121; p<0.005), particularly for KRAB box transcription factors (n = 84; p<0.002). KRAB-containing proteins are thought to have critical functions in cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis and neoplastic transformation [22]. In an effort to determine the aberrant functions of MYCN within cell lines containing the amplification, we generated a data set of genes which were unique to the amplified cell line Kelly when compared to the unamplified SK-N-AS. In a similar manner, we identified genes which were unique to the over-expressing state of the SHEP untreated cell line when compared to the dox treated, low-expressing state.

Gene ontology analysis of genes unique to the MYCN over-expressing states reveals statistically significant enrichment for genes which function across seventeen functional categories and include mRNA transcriptional regulation (Kelly, p = 1.18 E-17; SHEP untreated, p = 1.41 E-21), DNA helicases (Kelly, p = 1.64 E-09; SHEP untreated, p = 3.22 E-05), Non-receptor serine/threonine protein kinases (Kelly, p = 4.33 E-07; SHEP untreated, p = 3.72E-18) and genes involved in G-protein mediated signalling (Kelly, p = 2.24 E-09; SHEP untreated, p = 1.15 E-12), (Table S2). KEGG pathway analysis revealed a shortlist of genes whose promoters uniquely bound MYCN in the over expressing state and who are members of established signalling pathways which are dysregulated in cancer. Examples include members of the MAPK signaling pathway, such as NRAS, a known oncogene; and members of the WNT signaling pathway, DVL2, DVL3, APC and TCF7 which have been previously implicated in colorectal and other cancers [23], [24].

Co-Localization of MYCN Binding Sites and DNA Hypermethylation

Increasing evidence for MYC family members having an epigenetic role has been previously reported. This includes MYCN exerting a more global effect on transcription by influencing states of chromatin structure [11], as well as the recruitment of methyltransferase DNMT3a to the c-MYC-MIZ1 complex [25]. In order to investigate further the epigenetic link of MYCN function, we carried out methylation profiling of NB cell lines. Hypermethylated DNA was isolated using the methylated DNA immunoprecipitation method – MeDIP [26] and hybridised to a commercial tiling array containing all UCSC annotated CpG islands (28,226) and all known reference gene promoter regions (Promoter Plus Arrays; NimbleGen). Regions shared across the methylation CpG Island/promoter array and the ChIP two-array promoter formats were extracted and used to compare the association of hypermethylation peaks and MYCN TFBS peaks. Regions of MYCN binding and DNA hypermethylation were defined as “associated” only if their mapped genomic coordinates directly overlapped. Table 1 displays the co-occurrence of MYCN binding and DNA hypermethylation across cell lines. The co-occurrence frequency is significantly higher than expected given the individual background frequencies of MYCN binding and hypermethylation in all NB cell lines examined. Furthermore we observed similar E-box usage across both methylated and non-methylated sites on promoter arrays. A pair-wise comparison of SHEP treated and untreated log2 ratio methylation data displayed a high degree of correlation (Figure S4; r = 0.89), similar to that of biological replicate experiments, indicating that DNA methylation patterns remain relatively stable following the decrease in MYCN levels in this cell line model.

Table 1
Association of MYCN transcription factor binding sites and hypermethylated regions in gene promoters.

To test whether the association of MYCN at sites of hypermethylation is correlated with reduced expression of genes, we have analyzed the Kelly and SK-N-AS cell lines using the NimbleGen expression microarray platform. First, we determined if hypermethylation in the absence of MYCN binding was associated with reduced expression in our data set. A total of 360 genes were identified as differentially methylated between the two cell lines (i.e. methylated in both replicates of one cell line, but not in both replicates of the other) and did not have MYCN binding. From this list, 218 genes were significantly differentially expressed between the two cell lines (1.5 fold minimal difference; Tables S3 and S4). Overall, hypermethylation correlated with lower gene expression for the majority of genes in both Kelly and SK-N-AS (p<0.001). Given that DNA methylation had a significant impact on gene expression in our data set, we then determined if MYCN binding at sites of hypermethylation had an effect on gene expression. We identified 28 genes which were exclusively hypermethylated and MYCN bound in Kelly compared to SK-N-AS. In total, 16 genes displayed differential expression, with 13 of these genes over expressed in Kelly compared to SK-N-AS (p = 0.01; 1.5 fold minimal difference; Table S5). A further analysis identified 29 genes that were hypermethylated in both Kelly and SK-N-AS which also had MYCN binding in Kelly but not in SK-N-AS. Of these, 17 genes were significantly differentially expressed between the two cell lines (Table S6), with a significant bias towards over expression in Kelly (15 up regulated and 2 down regulated; p = 0.002).

The relationship between MYCN binding and hypermethylation beyond promoter regions was also investigated using a custom tiling array (see methods). As this array consists of non-discrete tiled regions, the association of log2 ratios from MYCN ChIP-chip and MeDIP-chip was evaluated using Pearson's correlation and its corresponding p-value. Results based on this analysis confirmed that the correlation between MYCN binding and DNA hypermethylation extended to intergenic regions tiled on the arrays (Table 2). Selected methylated loci were confirmed by sequencing of bisulfite treated DNA (Table S7). In order to determine if this association occurs on the same copy of the chromosome we determined DNA copy number status on each cell line using microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH). Figure 3 displays the co-localization of MYCN binding sites with sites of DNA hypermethylation within a hemizygously deleted region on chromosome 3 in SK-N-AS. The detailed panel 3B displays an example of this combined MYCN/DNA hypermethylation analysis across 100 kb of genomic sequence encompassing the let-7 g and miR-135a-1 loci, illustrating the high correlation between MYCN binding and sites of DNA hypermethylation. Reverse transcriptase qPCR assays indicated that both of the miRNAs shown in Figure 3 are expressed in SK-N-AS (data not shown). However, the relationship of the identified peaks of hypermethylation/MYCN binding with expression is complicated by the fact that very little is known about the miRNA promoters. Of the four studies [27]-[30] which have reported on this subject, only Marson et al. [28] have reported a putative miRNA promoter region for mir-135a (chr3: 52307870-52308065) and 2 studies (Marson & Ozsolak et al.) [28], [29] have identified a putative let-7g promoter (region common to both studies; chr3:52207870-5230865). Both putative miRNA promoter regions fall outside of our identified peaks of hypermethylation and MYCN binding in SK-N-AS. The transcriptional control of let-7g is further complicated by the fact that it is present within the second intron of the WDR82 gene.

Figure 3
Association of MYCN binding and DNA hypermethylation around the let 7g and miR-135a-1 locus in SK-N-AS NB cell line.
Table 2
Association of MYCN transcription factor binding sites and hypermethylated regions in inter/intragenic regions.

Discussion

The MYCN oncogene was originally identified due to its frequent amplification and over expression in certain tumours, chiefly human neuroblastoma [31], [32]. In this study, we have identified and analysed high confidence MYCN binding sites using ChIP-chip assays based on two independent antibodies to gain an insight into the binding patterns and possible functions of MYCN. As far as we are aware, this conservative strategy has not been applied to ChIP-chip analysis of other transcription factors.

MYCN Exhibits Significant Selection of the CATGTG/CACATG E-box Motif

It has previously been reported that both c-MYC and MYCN bHLH transcription factors bind to the canonical E-box motif CAC(A/G)TG [33]-[36]. More recent studies have suggested that c-MYC exhibits a significant preference for CACGTG and a negative selection for CATGTG [37]. Our results indicate that MYCN exhibits greater E-box selectivity for the CATGTG motif in NB cell lines than for the classic CACGTG motif. Interestingly, in a recent MYCN ChIP analysis of the LIF promoter, which contains both CACGTG and CATGTG, exclusion of the CATGTG sequence resulted in a significant reduction of MYCN binding in-vitro [17]. The greater affinity of MYCN for CATGTG appears to occur in both MYCN amplified and non-amplified cells. Our findings are also consistent with the analysis of genes which are differentially expressed in response to MYCN over expression in NB cell lines, where the CATGTG motif was identified in the promoter regions of 95/139 differentially expressed genes (68%) compared to the CACGTG motif which was detected in promoter regions of 41/139 genes (29%) [4]. In contrast to our results, Cottermann et al previously reported a statistically significant over representation for the CACGTG E-box only [11]. However, this study varied in its experimental approach (e.g., use of one antibody, microarray design and data analysis parameters) and the reported enrichment analysis was based on a comparison between the presence of the CACGTG motif and all other E-box variants grouped together as CANNTG. Differences in reported E-box frequencies between both studies may therefore exist as we analysed each distinct class of E-box within the CANNTG group. This approach avoided any possible masking effect which an under represented E-box (CATTTG, Figure 2B) might have over a significantly over represented E-box (CAACTG, Figure 2B) within the CANNTG group.

In-vitro analyses have previously demonstrated the binding of c-MYC to cis-acting canonical E-boxes CACGTG and CATGTG [36] as well as non-canonical variants. Later ChIP-seq in-vivo analysis indicated that c-MYC bound to both forms in B-cells [19] and that the CACGTG was predominant in HeLa cells. Previous evidence indicates some E-box preference in the MYC family where Kim et al. demonstrated that although CACGTG is enriched, an increase in Myc binding to promoters that contain each of the previously defined E-box sequences, except CATGTG was observed [37].

From the functional perspective, Westermann et al. [13] reported an inverse relationship between MYCN and c-MYC expression in different neuroblastoma tumor subtypes, where c-MYC was expressed at higher levels in MYCN single copy high risk tumors relative to MYCN amplified or MYCN single copy low risk tumors. Although this finding indicated a potential redundancy for the functions of these genes in tumorigenesis, the authors also demonstrated that a significant number of MYCN/c-MYC target genes are less responsive to MYCN than to c-MYC and also that a subgroup of genes were repressed by MYCN but not by c-MYC. Our results, highlighting differences in E-box selection between MYCN and c-MYC would indicate that these transcription factors should not be completely functionally redundant in cancer. The differences in E-box usage also have relevance to the role of these genes in normal developmental processes. Both proteins clearly play distinct roles in development since homozygous null c-Myc and MYCN mice die at about embryonic days 10 and 12, respectively. When mycn is inserted into the c-myc locus in mice, it is expressed and regulated similarly to c-myc during development and to a great degree restores normal development to c-myc homozygous null mice [38]. However, non-redundancy is evidenced by the fact that these mice are significantly smaller and in some cases display dystrophy of skeletal muscle. This evidence suggests that although mycn and c-myc share some functional roles, mycn cannot completely replace all functions of c-myc even when similarly regulated. The fact that these proteins share only 32% amino acid sequence similarity [39] is another good indication that they should not be completely functionally redundant. Tissue specific conditional mycn knockout in neural progenitor cells during mouse development has demonstrated the importance of mycn for regulating neurogenesis [40], perhaps explaining the greater role of MYCN in neuroblastoma pathogenesis over c-MYC.

Potential Oncogenic Functions of MYCN in the Amplified State

Amplification of the MYCN locus (up to 200 copies) in NB leads to increased protein production and based on our results, leads to an extra 1,142 MYCN peaks detected within promoter regions in Kelly compared to the MYCN unamplified cell line SK-N-AS. Gene ontology analysis of targets which are uniquely bound by MYCN in the over expressing state revealed enrichment for DNA helicases and mRNA transcriptional regulation, amongst others. It has been previously shown that MYCN may mediate proliferation in NB through association with the promoter regions of the minichromosome maintanence complex genes (MCM), resulting in increased expression [8]. The MCM protein family function as DNA helicases which are critical for DNA synthesis, play a significant role in various aspects of genome stability [41], [42] and are dysregulated in numerous cancer types [43][46]. However, the role of the specific MYCN positive DNA helicases and other functional groups identified remains the subject of further study.

A more focused KEGG pathway analysis of our data indicates that MYCN binds upstream to a number of genes in the WNT signalling pathway. Dysregulation of genes associated with the WNT/β-Catenin pathway has been previously reported in a cohort of 73 primary NB tumours [47]. Interestingly, differential expression of genes within the pathway was identified between MNA and high-stage non-MNA subtypes. In our data, DVL2, DVL3, APC and TCF7 were identified as bound by MYCN only in the over expressing state (Kelly and SHEP untreated). However, these targets must be further functionally tested to evaluate the influence of MYCN on this pathway. Finally, additional genes which were identified from our MYCN binding analysis have also been recently reported by Vermeulen et al. [48] as part of a 59-gene expression signature which was applied as an accurate predictor of clinical outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. Although multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the signature was independently statistically significant in a model adjusted for MYCN status and other predictors of prognosis, we have determined that a number of these genes including PTN and CPSG3, have positive MYCN binding sites upstream suggesting that MYCN may play a part in the control of these genes.

Based on the analysis of E-box usage in the MYCN amplified state, we hypothesize that over expression of MYCN in the amplified state may lead to aberrant binding to additional weaker affinity E-box motifs such as CATTTG, CATCTG and CAACTG. One striking observation when comparing the E-box usage of MYCN targets in the unamplified compared to the amplified state was that one motif, CATTTG, switched from being statistically underrepresented in the unamplified state (p = 0.014) to statistically significantly over represented in the amplified state (p = 0.023). Interestingly, a bHLH transcription factor which is phylogenetically related to MYC, microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) [49], binds the classic E-box motif CACGTG as well as CATTTG [50]-[52]. MITF, which is not expressed in NB cells [53], has been shown to have a role in the regulation of melanocyte development and is similar to MYCN in that it is a reported oncogene which is amplified in cancer [54]. It may be possible that an excess of MYCN in MYCN amplified NB leads to weak aberrant binding at unoccupied CATTTG sites potentially deregulating the expression of MITF or other bHLH targets in NB cells, thus promoting tumorigenesis.

Associated MYCN and Hypermethylated Loci

Utilizing a combined genome-wide ChIP-chip/MeDIP-chip approach we demonstrated that MYCN binding is highly enriched in genomic regions of DNA hypermethylation and that enrichment of this co-localization is prominent within intra- and intergenic regions in addition to promoter sequences. Previous promoter based in-silico analysis of hypermethylated DNA sequences has demonstrated enrichment for specific transcription factors [55]. The non-random association of MYCN binding with DNA hypermethylated sequences might be explained through the previous observation that c-MYC can recruit the DNA methytransferase DNMT3a to the promoter region of genes to induce gene silencing [25]. Brenner et al. [25] determined that there was a synergistic repressive effect on the promoter of p21, when both c-MYC and DNMT3a were co-transfected into U2OS cells. The model involved c-MYC binding to the cofactor MIZ to form a ternary complex with DNMT3a at the promoter of p21, inducing methylation. Although, structural differences exist between c-MYC and MYCN within the N-terminal domain, both proteins contain the MBI and MBII domains which are required to associate with DNMT3a [25], [56], indicating that MYCN could interact in a similar manner.

Interestingly, Perini et al. [12] demonstrated that methylation of the CpG dinucleotide within the CACGTG E-box prevents MYCN binding to a number of gene promoters [12]. Our results showing preferential association of MYCN to sites that are hypermethylated are not inconsistent with Perini et al. since our array results are not of sufficient resolution to ascertain the methylation status of specific base pairs. In addition, analysis of E-box motifs confirmed that there was no significant difference in the E-box usage of the classical CACGTG in methylated compared to non-methylated sites, which one would expect if this sequence was predominantly utilised by MYCN. It is also possible that in many instances MYCN is not binding directly to DNA sequences, but instead is interacting with another DNA binding partner, such as a methyl binding protein.

Through the integration of DNA copy number, MeDIP-chip and MYCN ChIP-chip data for the same NB cell lines we have identified overlapping regions of hypermethylated DNA and MYCN binding within hemizygously deleted chromosomal regions, thus confirming that this association occurs on the same allele. Previously, Cotterman et al. [11] determined that MYCN is a weak transcription factor even at genes which it directly binds and found that overall changes in the expression of MYCN bound genes were modest, most often in the range of 2-fold or less despite profound chromatin modification changes. Based on our expression analysis of methylated genes, we confirmed that differentially hypermethylated genes correlated with lower expression in both NB cell lines studied. Surprisingly, upon integrating the MYCN ChIP-chip, methylation and expression data, we discovered that genes which are MYCN bound and hypermethylated tend to have increased expression compared to genes which are methylated/not MYCN bound or not methylated/not MYCN bound. The association of MYCN with higher expression of methylated promoter regions although interesting, requires further experimentation to determine if there is an actual cause and effect relationship. In addition, other factors such as differences in miRNA expression profiles could also be influencing gene expression.

It has also been reported that MYCN has a much more global role in the regulation of transcription and chromatin than previously anticipated and that it is required to maintain euchromatin in a wide spread manner, including at intergenic sites [11], [57]. When analysed, the association of putative MYCN binding sites within inter- and intragenic regions was more prominent than that observed at annotated classical promoter sequences, possibly supporting its role as a more global mediator of chromatin modification. Our results further support a possible dual role for MYCN and DNA hypermethylation, namely that of a classical transcriptional repressor of upstream genes and that of a mediator of global chromatin structure. A future aspect which should be considered is a more comprehensive analysis of MeDIP, MYCN ChIP-chip and other possible co-factors such as DNMT3a, using sets of higher density whole genome arrays or a next generation sequencing platform.

Materials and Methods

Western Blot

Total cell lysate and nuclear extractions were prepared from the cultured neuroblastoma cell lines SHEP-21N, Kelly and SK-N-AS. These lysates were added to Laemmlibuffer, electrophoresed in a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking overnight with milk protein, the blots were probed with either a 1 in 500 dilution of NCMII-100 (ab16898; Abcam) or B84b (sc-53993; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies, followed by a 1 in 2000 dilution of secondary rabbit anti-mouse IgG antibody (ab6728-1; Abcam). The specificity of the antibodies for MYCN was confirmed and blots were then stripped and reprobed using a 1 in 2000 dilution of mouse anti-GAPDH antibody (Ab9484; Abcam). The expression of MYCN was detected in all cell lines (Figure S1C–E).

Cell Culture

SHEP-21N Cells were obtained from Dr Louis Chesler with the permission of Prof. Manfred Swab. The Kelly and SK-N-AS cell lines were obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (Porton Down, United Kingdom). SK-N-AS cells were grown in EMEM supplemented with 1% non-essential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin. Kelly cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin. SHEP-21N cells were grown in RPMI 1640 with 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin and 10% tetracycline-free fetal bovine serum (HYC-001-333C, Fisher Scientific) In order to abrogate the expression of MYCN in the SHEP-21N cell line, the cells were maintained in their growth media supplemented with 50ng/ml Doxycycline (8634-1, Clontech). Cells were cultured using Hyperflask cell culture vessels (#10010, Corning) for six days. All cell culture reagents were obtained from GIBCO unless otherwise stated.

ChIP-Chip Analysis

ChIP assays were performed using the above antibodies according to the standard NimbleGen ChIP protocol. Briefly, 1×109 cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde solution for 10 min on ice, centrifuged and rinsed with ice-cold PBS. Cell nuclei were isolated and sonicated to generate DNA fragments of approximately 1 kb in length. The resulting fragmented chromatin was aliquoted into 2 mg/ml stocks and stored at −80°C. One 2 mg/ml aliquot was used per ChIP reaction. DNA was enriched by immunoprecipitation using 10 µg of either the B8.4.B or NCMII-100 anti-MYCN antibodies complexed to M-280 Sheep anti-Mouse Dynabeads (112-02D, Invitrogen). The formaldehyde crosslinks, protein and RNA was removed from the immunoprecipitated DNA sample through heat denaturing, proteinase K and RNase A treatments. An un-enriched sample of DNA was treated in a similar manner to serve as input. ChIP and input DNA was fluorescently labelled using Klenow fragment (M0212M, New England Biolabs) and Cy5/Cy3 random primers (N46-0001-50/N46-0002-50, TriLink BioTechnologies). The Cy5-ChIP and Cy3-input labelled DNA samples were co-hybridized to microarrays for 18 hours, post hybridisation washes were carried out and microarrays were scanned using an Axon 4000B microarray scanner with GenePix 6.0 (Molecular Devices). Microarrays used included the HG18 two-Array Promoter Set and a custom miRNA array manufactured by Roche NimbleGen. The promoter arrays include an average coverage of 4.7 kb around promoters for all RefSeq genes, UCSC known genes and the Mammalian Gene Collection. A custom array was designed to include tiled sequence of 50 kb 5′ and 20 kb 3′ of 528 miRNAs. Image files generated after scanning were analyzed using NimbleScan Software Version 2.4. Sites of enrichment were identified using the normalised log2 ratios and the NimbleScan peak finding function. The in-built peak analysis algorithm detects significantly enriched regions that have at least 4 probes above a threshold value of log 2.0, identifies them as “peaks” and assigns a false discovery rate (FDR). An FDR value of 0.1 was used in the initial screening of peaks from individual experiments for both NCMII-100 and B84b antibodies. Peaks with an FDR of less than 0.1 which were shared across ChIP reactions using both MYCN antibodies were filtered using an in-house Java application. This produced a final set of consistently bound high confidence regions for each of the cell lines used in the study. This final set of high confidence peaks was subsequently used in further transcription factor binding site and Gene Ontology analysis.

Transcription Factor Binding Site Analysis

DNA sequence data for the processed ChIP regions for each cell line were retrieved from the UCSC database [58]. Phylogenetically conserved sequence between Human (Hg18) and Mouse was selected for motif analysis. E-box specificity was assessed by examining the occurrence of the various forms of E-boxes conforming to the generic CANNTG motif. When counting E-box motifs within the ChIP derived putative MYCN binding sites, both the forward and reverse of each motif was taken into account. If this were not the case palindromic sequences such as CACGTG would be artificially over-represented with respect to other motifs. The sequence present on the promoter array was used to assess the background frequency of each E-box motif. In order to assess over or under-representation within ChIP sequences it is also essential to take into account the lengths of the ChIP sequences. For example, if the average length of a ChIP pull-down is 550 bp this window must also be used when performing a random background count of this motif. Significance for over (or under) -representation was assessed using P-values based on Fisher's Exact test when compared to background motif frequency.

Gene Ontology Analysis

Gene Ontology analysis was carried out using the DAVID Functional Annotation Tool [20], [21]. In all analysis the following parameters were used - Functional enrichment was assessed using the Panther Biological Process and Molecular Function and KEGG Pathway databases. A custom Java based application was used to identify common and unique peaks of enrichment across cell lines and the resulting gene Entrez IDs were submitted to DAVID. Significance of over-representation of functional categories was assessed via Fisher's exact test and corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. After analysis, all categories with a p value greater than 0.001 and which represented less than 5% of the total number of genes was eliminated. Redundant and non-informative terms (eg. Other Metabolic Pathways) were also excluded.

Q-PCR Analysis

Taqman Probes were designed and manufactured by Applied Biosystems against regions of enrichment identified for the ChIP-chip experiments. A negative control probe was also designed against un-enriched genomic regions for comparison. Q-PCR analysis was performed on immunoprecipitated and un-enriched input DNA samples in duplicate. The relative level of enrichment (RQ) was calculated for each of the target regions using the comparative Ct method. Details of primer and probe sequences are provided in Table S8.

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation

The protocol used was as previously described by Weber et al. [26]. Briefly, five micrograms of DNA was fragmented by sonication to 400–800 bp in size and confirmed by running 100 ng on a 2% agarose gel. Four micrograms of the sonicated DNA was incubated overnight with an anti-5′ methyl-cytidine antibody (BI-MECY-1000; Eurogentec). A Taqman quality control qPCR assay was performed to detect the relative fold change of enrichment of the methylated H19 locus relative to an unmethylated H3B [59], prior to microarray hybridization (Figure S5). The MeDIP DNA and reference control were differentially labelled using Cy5 and Cy3 respectively, and co-hybridised to a custom miRNA array and the CpG Island promoter plus array from Roche NimbleGen. The 385,000 probe CpG Island Plus Promoter Array includes all UCSC-annotated CpG islands, 1 kb tiled sequence around all RefSeq gene promoter regions and DNA methylation positive control regions (HoxA, H19/IGF2, KCNQ1 clusters). Arrays were scanned using the GenePix 4000B scanner and the following analysis was performed using the Nimblescan Software Version 2.4: normalised log2 ratio data was calculated and a one-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS; using a sliding window of 750 bp) was applied to determine whether the probes were drawn from a significantly more positive distribution of intensity log-ratios than those on the rest of the microarray. The resulting score for each probe was the -log10 p-value from the windowed KS test around that probe. Hypermethylated peaks were detected by searching for at least 2 probes above a p-value minimum cut off (−log10 of 2) and peaks within 500 bp of each other are merged. Resulting data files were visualised using SignalMap 1.9. Experiments were performed in duplicate. Pair-wise comparison of cell line replicates resulted in high correlation co-efficients [r = 0.82 (Kelly) and 0.89 (SK-N-AS); Figure S6]. Peaks only detected in both experiments were used for further analysis.

Bisulphite Sequencing

A total of 500 ng of DNA from Kelly and SK-N-AS was bisulphite converted using the EZ DNA-methylation Gold kit (Cat. No. D5005 & D5006, Zymo) using the alternative conversion reaction 2 as per manufacturer's instructions. The converted DNA was subsequently purified in 50 µl of elution buffer. PCR primers were designed using methyl primer express (www.appliedbiosystems.com/methylprimerexpress). PCR was carried out using AmpliTaq Gold mastermix (Cat.No. 4326717, Applied biosystems) under the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min; 94°C for 30 sec, 58–60°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec (35 cycles) followed by 72°C for 10 min. The PCR product was resolved on a 1.5% agarose gel with SYBR-safe. Twenty microlitres of PCR product was subsequently purified using ExoSAP-IT (Cat No. 78200, USB) and QIAquick PCR purification kit (Cat. No. 28104, Qiagen), as per manufacturer's instructions. Purified PCR product was further sequenced in the forward and reverse direction at MWG biotech. Resulting electropherograms were analyzed using the BIQ analyzer [60].

Array-CGH Analysis

Array CGH was carried out as previously described [61] using a 385,000 feature array from NimbleGen.

Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from Kelly and SK-N-AS using the RNeasy Mini kit (Cat. No. 74104, as per manufacturer's instructions QIAGEN), including on-column digestion of DNA using the RNase-Free DNase Set (Cat. No. 79254, QIAGEN), to ensure complete DNA removal. RNA integrity was confirmed using the Experion RNA StdSens Analysis Kit (Cat. No. 700-7103, Bio-Rad). The ExpressArt TR Micro Kit (Cat. No. 6199-A30, AmpTec) was used to synthesise double-stranded cDNA from 3 ug total RNA, which was subsequently used to generate amplified amino-allyl antisense RNA (aRNA) using the SuperScript Indirect RNA Amplification System (Cat. No. L1016-01, Invitrogen). The aRNA was coupled to Cy3 reactive dye (Cat. No. 25-8010-79, Amersham Biosciences). Four micrograms of Cy3-aRNA was hybridised to the Homo sapiens 4x72K Gene Expression Array from Roche NimbleGen (Cat. No. A4487001-00-01), as per manufacturer's instructions. Arrays were scanned using the GenePix 4000B scanner and gene expression data analysis was performed using NimbleScan Software Version 2.4.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Performance of MYCN ChIP-chip antibodies. (A & B) Pair-wise comparison of log2 ratio between two different antibodies used for the ChIP reactions on microarrays containing promoter regions from chromosome 1 to 10p (A) and chromosome 10q to Y (B). An average value over 4 probes was used for plotting, consistent with the peak finding analysis software criteria. Pearson correlations (r) is displayed at the top right of each panel. (C) Western blot of Kelly and SHEP nuclear extracts using the MYCN antibody NCMII-100, (D) Western blot of Kelly and SHEP and SK-N-AS nuclear extracts using the MYCN antibody B84b. (E) Western blot of SK-N-AS using both MYCN antibodies. Blots were reprobed for GAPDH which confirmed even loading across wells.

(0.73 MB TIF)

Figure S2

PCR validation of MYCN ChIP reactions. qPCR validation of positive MYCN transcription factor binding sites. Fold enrichment of positive MYCN target sites is displayed. Experiments were carried out in duplicate using the delta-delta Ct method and results are plotted relative to a negative MYCN binding region (SEMA3B) identified on the arrays and set to 1.0.

(0.31 MB TIF)

Figure S3

Association of E-box frequency to raw fluorescent ratios in SK-N-AS. Y-axis represents the E-box frequency per kilobase, while the x-axis indicates the florescent intensity ratios.

(0.08 MB TIF)

Figure S4

Pair-wise comparison of MeDIP log2 ratios between SHEP treated and untreated cell lines. An average value over 4 probes was used for plotting. Pearson correlations (r) is displayed at the top of the panel.

(0.21 MB TIF)

Figure S5

qPCR enrichment of MeDIP reactions. Graph displays fold enrichment for Kelly and SK-N-AS using the Ct method for the imprinted H19 locus versus a non-methylated H3B promoter following immunoprecipitation with an anti-methyl cytidine antibody, as used by Weber et al. [59]. A negative control MeDIP reaction using an isotype matched normal mouse IgG antibody is also displayed. PCR reactions were performed in duplicate.

(3.18 MB TIF)

Figure S6

Pair-wise comparison of MeDIP log2 ratios between NB cell line replicates. (A) Kelly and (B) SK-N-AS pair-wise comparison plots. An average value over 4 probes was used for plotting. Pearson correlations is displayed at the top of the panel.

(0.49 MB TIF)

Table S1

MYCN binding sites common to all NB cell lines.

(0.09 MB PDF)

Table S2

Gene ontology of MYCN target genes.

(0.07 MB PDF)

Table S3

Expression of genes (fold change <0.5 and >1.5) which are methylated in SK-N-AS and not methylated in Kelly.

(0.07 MB PDF)

Table S4

Expression of genes (fold change <0.5 and >1.5) which are methylated in Kelly and not methylated in SK-N-AS.

(0.07 MB PDF)

Table S5

Expression of genes (fold change <0.5 and >1.5) which are methylated and MYCN bound in Kelly and not methylated or MYCN bound in SK-N-AS.

(0.04 MB PDF)

Table S6

Expression of genes (fold change <0.5 and >1.5) which are methylated and MYCN bound in Kelly and methylated but not MYCN bound in SK-N-AS.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S7

Bi-sulphite sequencing of selected loci.

(0.01 MB PDF)

Table S8

Taqman q-PCR primer and probes.

(0.06 MB PDF)

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by grants from Science Foundation Ireland, Children's Medical and Research Foundation, Cancer Research Ireland, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (5R01CA127496). PGB is supported by a Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellowship in Science, Engineering and Technology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Mukherjee B, Morgenbesser SD, DePinho RA. Myc family oncoproteins function through a common pathway to transform normal cells in culture: cross-interference by Max and trans-acting dominant mutants. Genes Dev. 1992;6:1480–1492. [PubMed]
2. Prochownik EV, VanAntwerp ME. Differential patterns of DNA binding by myc and max proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:960–964. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Schwab M, Varmus HE, Bishop JM. Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. Science. 1984;224:1121–1124. [PubMed]
4. Alaminos M, Mora J, Cheung NK, Smith A, Qin J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression associated with MYCN in human neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4538–4546. [PubMed]
5. Valentijn LJ, Koppen A, van Asperen R, Root HA, Haneveld F, et al. Inhibition of a new differentiation pathway in neuroblastoma by copy number defects of N-myc, Cdc42, and nm23 genes. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3136–3145. [PubMed]
6. Schulte JH, Horn S, Otto T, Samans B, Heukamp LC, et al. MYCN regulates oncogenic MicroRNAs in neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:699–704. [PubMed]
7. Koppen A, Ait-Aissa R, Hopman S, Koster J, Haneveld F, et al. Dickkopf-1 is down-regulated by MYCN and inhibits neuroblastoma cell proliferation. Cancer Lett. 2007;256:218–228. [PubMed]
8. Koppen A, Ait-Aissa R, Koster J, van Sluis PG, Ora I, et al. Direct regulation of the minichromosome maintenance complex by MYCN in neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:2413–2422. [PubMed]
9. Slack A, Chen Z, Tonelli R, Pule M, Hunt L, et al. The p53 regulatory gene MDM2 is a direct transcriptional target of MYCN in neuroblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:731–736. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Fontana L, Fiori ME, Albini S, Cifaldi L, Giovinazzi S, et al. Antagomir-17-5p abolishes the growth of therapy-resistant neuroblastoma through p21 and BIM. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Cotterman R, Jin VX, Krig SR, Lemen JM, Wey A, et al. N-Myc regulates a widespread euchromatic program in the human genome partially independent of its role as a classical transcription factor. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9654–9662. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Perini G, Diolaiti D, Porro A, Della Valle G. In vivo transcriptional regulation of N-Myc target genes is controlled by E-box methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12117–12122. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Westermann F, Muth D, Benner A, Bauer T, Henrich KO, et al. Distinct transcriptional MYCN/c-MYC activities are associated with spontaneous regression or malignant progression in neuroblastomas. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Lutz W, Stohr M, Schurmann J, Wenzel A, Lohr A, et al. Conditional expression of N-myc in human neuroblastoma cells increases expression of alpha-prothymosin and ornithine decarboxylase and accelerates progression into S-phase early after mitogenic stimulation of quiescent cells. Oncogene. 1996;13:803–812. [PubMed]
15. Godfried MB, Veenstra M, v Sluis P, Boon K, v Asperen R, et al. The N-myc and c-myc downstream pathways include the chromosome 17q genes nm23-H1 and nm23-H2. Oncogene. 2002;21:2097–2101. [PubMed]
16. Gupta A, Williams BR, Hanash SM, Rawwas J. Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II is a direct transcriptional target of MycN in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8100–8108. [PubMed]
17. Cotterman R, Knoepfler PS. N-Myc regulates expression of pluripotency genes in neuroblastoma including lif, klf2, klf4, and lin28b. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5799. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Krig SR, Jin VX, Bieda MC, O'Geen H, Yaswen P, et al. Identification of genes directly regulated by the oncogene ZNF217 using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-chip assays. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:9703–9712. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Zeller KI, Zhao X, Lee CW, Chiu KP, Yao F, et al. Global mapping of c-Myc binding sites and target gene networks in human B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17834–17839. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Dennis G, Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. [PubMed]
22. Urrutia R. KRAB-containing zinc-finger repressor proteins. Genome Biol. 2003;4:231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Moon RT, Kohn AD, De Ferrari GV, Kaykas A. WNT and beta-catenin signalling: diseases and therapies. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:691–701. [PubMed]
24. You XJ, Bryant PJ, Jurnak F, Holcombe RF. Expression of Wnt pathway components frizzled and disheveled in colon cancer arising in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Oncol Rep. 2007;18:691–694. [PubMed]
25. Brenner C, Deplus R, Didelot C, Loriot A, Vire E, et al. Myc represses transcription through recruitment of DNA methyltransferase corepressor. EMBO J. 2005;24:336–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Weber M, Davies JJ, Wittig D, Oakeley EJ, Haase M, et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat Genet. 2005;37:853–862. [PubMed]
27. Fujita S, Iba H. Putative promoter regions of miRNA genes involved in evolutionarily conserved regulatory systems among vertebrates. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:303–308. [PubMed]
28. Marson A, Levine SS, Cole MF, Frampton GM, Brambrink T, et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2008;134:521–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Ozsolak F, Poling LL, Wang Z, Liu H, Liu XS, et al. Chromatin structure analyses identify miRNA promoters. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3172–3183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Corcoran DL, Pandit KV, Gordon B, Bhattacharjee A, Kaminski N, et al. Features of mammalian microRNA promoters emerge from polymerase II chromatin immunoprecipitation data. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5279. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Kohl NE, Kanda N, Schreck RR, Bruns G, Latt SA, et al. Transposition and amplification of oncogene-related sequences in human neuroblastomas. Cell. 1983;35:359–367. [PubMed]
32. Schwab M, Alitalo K, Klempnauer KH, Varmus HE, Bishop JM, et al. Amplified DNA with limited homology to myc cellular oncogene is shared by human neuroblastoma cell lines and a neuroblastoma tumour. Nature. 1983;305:245–248. [PubMed]
33. Blackwell TK, Kretzner L, Blackwood EM, Eisenman RN, Weintraub H. Sequence-specific DNA binding by the c-Myc protein. Science. 1990;250:1149–1151. [PubMed]
34. Alex R, Sozeri O, Meyer S, Dildrop R. Determination of the DNA sequence recognized by the bHLH-zip domain of the N-Myc protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:2257–2263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Ma A, Moroy T, Collum R, Weintraub H, Alt FW, et al. DNA binding by N- and L-Myc proteins. Oncogene. 1993;8:1093–1098. [PubMed]
36. Blackwell TK, Huang J, Ma A, Kretzner L, Alt FW, et al. Binding of myc proteins to canonical and noncanonical DNA sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:5216–5224. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Kim J, Lee JH, Iyer VR. Global identification of Myc target genes reveals its direct role in mitochondrial biogenesis and its E-box usage in vivo. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1798. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Malynn BA, de Alboran IM, O'Hagan RC, Bronson R, Davidson L, et al. N-myc can functionally replace c-myc in murine development, cellular growth, and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1390–1399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Stanton LW, Schwab M, Bishop JM. Nucleotide sequence of the human N-myc gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:1772–1776. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Knoepfler PS, Cheng PF, Eisenman RN. N-myc is essential during neurogenesis for the rapid expansion of progenitor cell populations and the inhibition of neuronal differentiation. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2699–2712. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Forsburg SL. Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:109–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Bailis JM, Luche DD, Hunter T, Forsburg SL. Minichromosome maintenance proteins interact with checkpoint and recombination proteins to promote s-phase genome stability. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:1724–1738. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Chatrath P, Scott IS, Morris LS, Davies RJ, Rushbrook SM, et al. Aberrant expression of minichromosome maintenance protein-2 and Ki67 in laryngeal squamous epithelial lesions. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1048–1054. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Davies RJ, Freeman A, Morris LS, Bingham S, Dilworth S, et al. Analysis of minichromosome maintenance proteins as a novel method for detection of colorectal cancer in stool. Lancet. 2002;359:1917–1919. [PubMed]
45. Sirieix PS, O'Donovan M, Brown J, Save V, Coleman N, et al. Surface expression of minichromosome maintenance proteins provides a novel method for detecting patients at risk for developing adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2560–2566. [PubMed]
46. Davidson EJ, Morris LS, Scott IS, Rushbrook SM, Bird K, et al. Minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) proteins, cyclin B1 and D1, phosphohistone H3 and in situ DNA replication for functional analysis of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:257–262. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Liu X, Mazanek P, Dam V, Wang Q, Zhao H, et al. Deregulated Wnt/beta-catenin program in high-risk neuroblastomas without MYCN amplification. Oncogene. 2008;27:1478–1488. [PubMed]
48. Vermeulen J, De Preter K, Naranjo A, Vercruysse L, Van Roy N, et al. Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:663–671. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Ledent V, Paquet O, Vervoort M. Phylogenetic analysis of the human basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Genome Biol. 2002;3:RESEARCH0030. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Ito A, Jippo T, Wakayama T, Morii E, Koma Y, et al. SgIGSF: a new mast-cell adhesion molecule used for attachment to fibroblasts and transcriptionally regulated by MITF. Blood. 2003;101:2601–2608. [PubMed]
51. Morii E, Ito A, Jippo T, Koma Y, Oboki K, et al. Number of mast cells in the peritoneal cavity of mice: influence of microphthalmia transcription factor through transcription of newly found mast cell adhesion molecule, spermatogenic immunoglobulin superfamily. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:491–499. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Levy C, Khaled M, Fisher DE. MITF: master regulator of melanocyte development and melanoma oncogene. Trends Mol Med. 2006;12:406–414. [PubMed]
53. Huber WE, Price ER, Widlund HR, Du J, Davis IJ, et al. A tissue-restricted cAMP transcriptional response: SOX10 modulates alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone-triggered expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanocytes. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:45224–45230. [PubMed]
54. Garraway LA, Widlund HR, Rubin MA, Getz G, Berger AJ, et al. Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma. Nature. 2005;436:117–122. [PubMed]
55. Li M, Paik HI, Balch C, Kim Y, Li L, et al. Enriched transcription factor binding sites in hypermethylated gene promoters in drug resistant cancer cells. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:1745–1748. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Oster SK, Mao DY, Kennedy J, Penn LZ. Functional analysis of the N-terminal domain of the Myc oncoprotein. Oncogene. 2003;22:1998–2010. [PubMed]
57. Cole MD, Cowling VH. Transcription-independent functions of MYC: regulation of translation and DNA replication. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:810–815. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Kuhn RM, Karolchik D, Zweig AS, Wang T, Smith KE, et al. The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D755–761. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Weber M, Hellmann I, Stadler MB, Ramos L, Paabo S, et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2007;39:457–466. [PubMed]
60. Bock C, Reither S, Mikeska T, Paulsen M, Walter J, et al. BiQ Analyzer: visualization and quality control for DNA methylation data from bisulfite sequencing. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:4067–4068. [PubMed]
61. Selzer RR, Richmond TA, Pofahl NJ, Green RD, Eis PS, et al. Analysis of chromosome breakpoints in neuroblastoma at sub-kilobase resolution using fine-tiling oligonucleotide array CGH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;44:305–319. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...