• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC Sep 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2771365
NIHMSID: NIHMS128019

A novel splice variant of GLI1 that promotes glioblastoma cell migration and invasion

Abstract

The family of GLI zinc-finger transcription factors regulates the expression of genes involved in many important cellular processes, notably, embryonal development and cellular differentiation. The glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (GLI1) isoform, in particular, has attracted much attention because of its frequent activation in many human cancers and its interactions with other signaling pathways, such as, those mediated by K-RAS, TGF-β, EGFR and PKA. Here, we report the identification of a novel truncated GLI1 splice variant, tGLI1, with an in-frame deletion of 123 bases (41 codons) spanning the entire exon 3 and part of exon 4 of the GLI1 gene. Expression of tGLI1 is undetectable in normal cells but is high in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and other cancer cells. Although tGLI1 undergoes nuclear translocalization and transactivates GLI1-binding sites similar to GLI1, unlike GLI1, it is associated with increased motility and invasiveness of GBM cells. Using microarray analysis, we showed over 100 genes to be differentially expressed in tGLI1- compared to GLI1-expressing GBM cells, although both cell types expressed equal levels of known GLI1-regulated genes, such as, PTCH1. We further showed that one of the tGLI1 upregulated genes, CD24, an invasion-associated gene to be required for the migratory and invasive phenotype of GBM cells. These data provide conclusive evidence for a novel gain-of-function GLI1 splice variant that promotes migration and invasiveness of GBM cells and open up a new research paradigm on the role of the GLI1 pathway in malignancy.

Keywords: Hedgehog pathway, GLI1, glioma, migration, invasion, CD24

INTRODUCTION

Glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1, GLI1, was first identified as an amplified gene in a human GBM (1) and later shown to be a member of the Kruppel family of zinc-finger transcription factors (2). GLI1 and two other members of the GLI family are nuclear mediators of the Hedgehog signaling pathway that regulates genes involved in early development of the central nervous system and in the malignant process in a number of tumor types (3, 4). Hedgehog signaling is activated following binding of the secreted Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) ligand to its receptor PTCH, an inhibitor of Smoothened (SMO). Shh-binding to PTCH derepresses SMO which, in turn, activates the release of GLI1 from cytoplasmic sequestration mediated by a protein complex that includes Sufu (4, 5). The released GLI1 translocates to the cell nucleus, where it binds to a consensus GLI1-binding element in target genes resulting in their activation (2).

Although, the GLI1 gene was first isolated from a human GBM (1) and the Hedgehog-GLI1 pathway is frequently activated in malignant gliomas (3, 6), the role of GLI1 in the biology of GBM remains poorly understood. In the course of our studies to gain a better understanding of the biology of malignant gliomas, we undertook the functional and structural characterization of the GLI1 gene in GBM. The results led to the identification of a previously unknown truncated GLI1 splice variant, tGLI1, in which the entire exon 3 and part of exon 4 of the GLI1 gene, corresponding to 41 codons and representing amino acid residues 34−74 are deleted. We showed that this novel truncated GLI1 is expressed in most GBMs, but not in normal brain and other normal cells, and that it is a gain-of-function variant of the GLI1 transcription factor that positively regulates the migratory and invasive phenotype of GBM cells and may thus be associated with the aggressiveness of these tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents, cell lines, xenografts and primary tumor specimens

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated. cDNAs of normal tissues and genomic DNAs from peripheral leukocytes were from BioChain (Hayward, CA). Human GBM cell lines were established in our laboratory from primary specimens (7), with the exception of U87MG, T98G, U373MG, U138MG and CRL1718 that were from ATCC (Manassas, VA). GBM xenografts established in the flanks of nude mice were provided by the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke University. Primary GBM specimens were generous gifts from Dr. Balveen Kaur at Ohio State University. All siRNA were purchased from Dharmacon Inc. (Lafayette, CO) and the sequences are 5’-GAAACAACAACUGGAACUU-3’ (human CD24 siRNA), 5’-GGUGAUUGCCCUUGAUUUC-3’ (human MEST siRNA) and 5’-UGGUUUACAUGUCGACUAA-3’ (non-targeting siRNA).

Plasmids

The GLI1-binding sites-driven luciferase construct, 8×3’Gli-BS Luc, was generously provided by Dr. Hiroshi Sasaki at Osaka University, Japan (8). Reporter constructs pCD24−1.2kb-Luc and pCD24−0.3kb-Luc were generous gifts from Genentech (9) and Dr. Tsuyoshi Fukushima at University of Miyazaki, Japan, respectively (10).

Immunoblotting

This was performed as described previously (11, 12). Antibodies used included mouse monoclonal antibodies against flag-tag (Sigma), β-actin (Sigma) and α-tubulin (Sigma), and Lamin B (EMD, Gibbstown, NJ), rabbit polyclonal GLI1 (H300, Santa Cruz) and CD24 (FL-80, Santa Cruz) antibodies, and goat polyclonal GLI1 antibody (C-18, Santa Cruz).

Cell proliferation assay

This was performed, as we described previously (11, 12), using the CellTiter Blue Cell Viability Assay kit (Promega), a fluorescent method that is based on the ability of living cells to convert a redox dye (resazurin) into a fluorescent end product (resorufin). Briefly, the cells were seeded on 96-well cell culture plates (4 × 103/well) and at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hrs, the number of viable cells determined.

Assay of glioma cell migration

The scratch wound assay (10) was used to determine glioma cell migratory activity. Briefly, tumor cells seeded in 6-well cell culture plates were carefully scratched with a fine pipette tip to create a gap. Images of the scratched cell monolayers were taken at 10X magnification and were used to compute gap width using the AXIO 4.0 software attached to the microscope. For each gap, the average width of three measurements (top, middle and bottom) of the microscopic field was computed.

Quantitation of glioma cell invasiveness

For this, the InnoCyte™ Quantitative Cell Invasion Assay (EMD) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1.75×105 cells were placed in the upper chamber of re-hydrated inserts with an 8-μm pore size polycarbonate membrane coated with a uniform layer of basement membrane matrix on the upper surface. Following incubation for 24 hrs, the medium in the upper chamber was discarded and the inserts placed in fresh wells containing fluorescent Calcein-AM cell staining/detachment buffer. Aliquots of the fluorescence-stained dislodged cells were transferred to duplicate wells of a 96-well cell culture plate and the fluorescence measured. The invasive tumor cells on the inserts were stained in 0.5% crystal violet.

GeneChip DNA microarray

Total RNA extracted from the three U87MG stable transfectants were used to examine their gene expression profile. This was conducted in the DNA Microarray Core Facility at Duke Institute of Genome Science & Policy using the human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array genechips (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) containing over 47,000 gene transcripts.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

This was performed using a ChIP Assay Kit (Upstate, Billerica, MA) as we described previously (13). A rabbit polyclonal GLI1 antibody (Santa Cruz, H300) that recognizes the C-terminal region (aa 781−1080 present in both GLI1 and tGLI1 proteins) of the human GLI1 proteins was used in these experiments. Primer sequences for amplifying the CD24 promoter are 5’-GCTATTGTGGCTTTCCTGGT-3’ (forward) and 5’-GCTGGGTGCTTGGAGAAC-3’ (reverse).

Xenografts, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining

GBM xenografts (three per group) were generated by subcutaneous implantation of U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 cells into the right flanks of female nude mice (NCI-Frederick). A total of 5 × 106 cells were used per inoculation. Tumors were excised, approximately 30 days post inoculation, embedded in paraffin, sectioned into 5 μM microsections, and subjected to IHC and to H&E staining. After deparaffinization, IHC was performed as described previously (11, 14) using a mouse anti-CD24 monoclonal antibody (Neomarker, Ab-2, 1:50) and a rabbit anti-GLI1 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz; H300; 1:75). For H&E staining, deparaffinized tumor sections were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin solution (Sigma, 15 mins), washed in water, stained with 0.5% eosin Y alcoholic solution (EMD, 2 mins), dehydrated in alcohol and mounted using xylene-based mounting medium (Vector Lab).

RESULTS

Identification of a novel GLI1 splicing variant

Analysis of multiple GLI1 cDNA clones from cells of a GBM cell line showed consistently the presence of two GLI1 transcripts. Nucleotide sequencing showed the larger transcript to be wild-type GLI1 while the smaller transcript corresponded to a truncated GLI1, tGLI1 (Fig. 1A-1B) that contains an in-frame deletion of 123 bases, spanning nt 179−301, encompassing the entire exon 3 and part of exon 4 of the GLI1 gene. The deleted region encodes 41 codons corresponding to amino acid residues 34−74. tGLI1 retained the major GLI1 functional domains, including, the degron degradation signals, the Sufu-binding domains, the nuclear localization signal, the zinc-finger DNA-binding domains and the transactivation domain. To further characterize the nature of this novel GLI1 variant, we PCR amplified exons 2−4 of the GLI1 gene from genomic DNA from 15 GBM cell lines, two normal human astrocyte cell lines and peripheral blood leukocytes from 48 normal adults. The nucleotide sequences of the amplified genomic DNA showed no deletion in the GLI1 gene in any of the specimens, confirming that tGLI1 is a product of post-transcriptional alternative splicing of the GLI1 mRNA.

Figure 1
Identification of a novel GLI1 splice variant

tGLI1 is frequently expressed in GBMs but not in normal tissues

The expression of tGLI1 and GLI1 transcripts in human GBMs was determined using cell lines, xenografts and primary specimens. The results of RT-PCR of exons 1−4 of GLI1 and subsequent nucleotide sequencing of the cDNAs are summarized in Fig. 1C. The majority (67%) of GBM cell lines, xenografts and primary specimens expressed comparable levels of tGLI1 and GLI1. In addition to the GBM, tGLI1 was also highly expressed in human breast cancer cells (Fig. S1). In contrast, tGLI1 was undetectable in normal brain (Fig. 1D-left) or other normal tissues (Fig. 1D-right). Interestingly, the GBMs we analyzed did not express a recently reported GLI1DeltaN variant that has been shown to contain a relatively large N-terminal deletion of amino acid residues 1−128 and to be expressed predominantly in normal tissues and to possess a weaker transcriptional activity compared to wild-type GLI1 (15). Together, these results provide strong evidence that tGLI1 expression is is a predominant characteristic of human GBM.

tGLI1 protein retains the ability to transactivate consensus GLI1-binding sites and undergo nuclear translocalization

For these studies, we created three U87MG stable transfectant lines, U87MG-vector, U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 that express the control vector, GLI1 and tGLI1, respectively. RT-PCR (Fig. 2A-left) confirmed expression of GLI1 in U87MG-GLI1 cells and tGLI1 in U87MG-tGLI1 cells, while immunoblotting showed that both cell lines expressed the full-length proteins (Fig. 2A-right). The levels of GLI1 and tGLI1 transcripts in GLI1/tGLI1-expressing cells were comparable to those observed in a primary GBM. Using these U87MG stable transfectants, we showed that GLI1 and tGLI1 similarly activated a GLI1-binding site cloned into a luciferase reporter, 8×3’Gli-BS Luc (8), both in the absence and the presence of the Shh ligand (Fig. 2B). The observed modest transcriptional induction by Shh is consistent with a previous study (3) reporting that GLI1 is constitutively activated in GBMs. However, another study (6) reported that the Shh pathway is activated in primary grade II and AAs, but not in GBMs. These observations suggest that the state of the Shh pathway in GBMs remains unclear. We further showed that tGLI1 is localized in the nucleus similar to GLI1, as indicated by nuclear fractionation/immunoblotting and immunofluorescence staining/confocal microscopy (Fig. 2C). In the former analysis, fractionation efficiency was indicated by the absence of the nuclear protein, lamin B, in the non-nuclear fractions and the absence of the cytosolic protein, α-tubulin, in the nuclear fractions. In the immunofluorescence staining/confocal microscopy, a flag antibody was used to detect flag-tagged GLI1/tGLI1 proteins (green) and propedium iodide was used to stain nuclei (red). The yellow merged signals indicate nuclear tGLI1/GLI1. The nuclear presence of tGLI1 is consistent with the fact that it contains an intact nuclear localization signal (Fig. 1A). The three stable transfectant lines had similar growth rates (Fig. 2D). Together, these results demonstrate that tGLI1 retains the ability to transactivate consensus GLI1-binding sites and to undergo nuclear localization similar to wild-type GLI1.

Figure 2
tGLI1 variant retains the ability to activate consensus GLI1-binding sites and undergo nuclear translocalization similar to GLI1

tGLI1 has a higher propensity to promote the migration and invasion of GBM cells than GLI1

Fig. 3A summarizes the results of the scratch wound migration assay and shows that U87MG-tGLI1 cells migrated at a significantly higher rate than both control U87MG-vector and U87MG-GLI1 cells. The average gap width after time, t, relative to that at time zero (t0) was used as a migratory index, Im. Im values at t24 were 12.7%, 17.3% and 100% for U87MG-vector, U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 cells, respectively (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3
tGLI1 variant has a higher propensity to promote the migratory and invasive phenotype in GBM cells than GLI1

The differential effects of GLI1 and tGLI1 on invasiveness of GBM cells was examined using a quantitative fluorescence invasion assay (Fig. 3B-top) and crystal violet staining of cells in the transwell assay (lower panel). In both assays, we showed that U87MG-tGLI1 cells were significantly more invasive than U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-vector cells. Both proliferation and invasiveness of the cells were determined and used to compute an invasion:proliferation ratio, as a quantitative measure of net invasiveness. The invasion:proliferation ratios were similar for the T98G GBM cells transiently transfected with the control, GLI1- and tGLI1-expression vectors (Fig. 3C-D). The growth curve for T98G cells over a 72 hr also showed no significant difference in proliferation under these conditions, indicating that the observed increase in migration and invasiveness was not due to increased proliferation. Together, these results demonstrate a higher propensity of tGLI1 relative to GLI1 to promote migration and invasiveness in GBM cells.

The tGLI1 protein binds to the CD24 promoter and activates gene expression

To gain further insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying tGLI1-mediated GBM cell migration and invasion, we examined the gene expression profiles of U87MG-tGLI1 cells and compared them to those of the U87MG-vector and U87MG-GLI1 cells. The results showed 75 genes to be expressed at a significantly higher level and 26 genes to be more suppressed in U87MG-tGLI1 cells compared to U87MG-vector and U87MGGLI1 cells (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Tables and Fig. S2). Interestingly, the levels of well-known GLI1 target genes, such as, PTCH1 were higher in both U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 cells compared to U87MG-vector cells. Also, U87MG-tGLI1 cells, but not U87MG-GLI1 or U87MG-vector cells, showed significantly higher levels of expression of the migration-associated gene, CD24. Because CD24 has been shown to recruit adhesion molecules to lipid rafts, thereby, contributing to tumor cell migration, dissemination and metastasis (16, 17), we focused on it to gain insight into the role of tGLI1 in the observed migratory and invasive phenotype of GBM cells. RT-PCR (Fig. 4B), quantitative RT-PCR (4C) and immunoblotting (4D) showed CD24 to be expressed at a significantly higher level in U87MG-tGLI1 cells than in U87MG-vector and U87MG-GLI1 cells. Subsequent web-based motif searches, including, TFSearch and TESS, showed no putative GLI1-binding sites in the human CD24 promoter. Both U87MGGLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 cell lines expressed the PTCH1 gene at equivalent levels, in contrast to U87MG-vector cells (Fig. 4B). This is consistent with the results of microarray and our findings (Figs. 1A&2B) showing that tGLI1 and GLI1 exhibit a similar ability to activate GLI1 target genes. In addition to CD24, we examined levels of MEST gene expression because DNA microarray identified MEST to be a potential tGLI1-regulated genem with the highest tGLI1/GLI1 ratio (260.2; Supplementary Table I). As shown by Fig. S3A,B in Supplementary Data, MEST gene transcripts and promoter activity were significantly higher in U87MG-tGLI1 cells compared to U87MG-vector and U8MG-GLI1 cells.

Figure 4
tGLI1 leads to a unique expression profile and activates CD24 expression

Analysis of protein:DNA binding using the ChIP assay showed that tGLI1, but not GLI1, binds to the CD24 promoter (Fig. 5A). Binding specificity was shown by the absence of any signals in the negative immunoprecipitation controls using mouse IgG. The results showed a significantly higher binding affinity of tGLI1 to the CD24 promoter, compared to GLI1 (p=0.012; Fig. 5B). To further characterize the region within the CD24 promoter required for tGLI1-mediated transcriptional activation, five reporter constructs carrying successively truncated (1.2 kb, 0.3 kb, 0.25 kb, 0.2 kb and 0.14 kb) CD24 promoter were used. As shown in Fig. 5C, deletion of the 0.91 kb region (nt −1167 to −253) did not substantially alter activity of the CD24 promoter and did not abolish tGLI1-mediated transcriptional activation, indicating that this region is not targeted by tGLI1. In contrast, CD24 promoter activity was decreased to basal level with deletion of the 0.06 kb region (nt −207 to −141), suggesting that this region is required for tGLI1-mediated induction of CD24 gene expression.

Figure 5
The tGLI1 protein binds to the CD24 promoter and activates CD24 gene expression

Using U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 xenografts established in the flanks of nude mice, we further found CD24 expression to be significantly higher in U87MG-tGLI1 tumors than U87MG-GLI1 xenografts (Fig. 5D-top). H&E staining indicated the U87MG-tGLI1 tumors to be more invasive than U87MG-GLI1 counterparts, as shown by their increased infiltration into the smooth muscles (sm). RT-PCR (Fig. 5D-lower panel) confirms expression of GLI1 and tGLI1 transcripts in U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 xenografts, respectively. Collectively, these results demonstrate that tGLI1 leads to a unique gene expression profile and that it transcriptionally activates the pro-migratory CD24 gene in GBM cells.

CD24 expression is required for tGLI1-mediated GBM cell migration and invasiveness

We found that CD24-specific siRNA significantly down-regulated CD24 expression, but not MEST (Fig. 6A-top panel) in U87MG-tGLI1 cells and reduced their migration to the level observed in U87MG-GLI1 cells (Fig. 6A-bottom panel). Similarly, the results of the invasion assay indicate that CD24 siRNA significantly decreased the net invasiveness of U87MG-tGLI1 cells by 3.15-fold (Fig. 6B). In contrast, MEST siRNA did not affect the invasiveness of U87MG-tGLI1 cells (Fig. S3C,D in Supplementary Data). To complement the siRNA experiments, U87MG cells were transiently transfected with the CD24-expressing vector and, in addition to the expected increased CD24 expression (Fig. 6C-left panel), there was a significant increase in the migration and net invasiveness of the cells, as shown by the scratch wound (Fig. 6C-right panel) and cell invasion (Fig. 6D) assays, respectively. Modulations of CD24 expression did not affect the proliferation of these GBM cells (Fig. S4A,B in Supplementary Data). Together, the results of these transcriptional knockdown and over-expression studies indicate that CD24 is required for tGLI1-mediated increase in GBM cell migration and invasiveness.

Figure 6
CD24 expression is required for tGLI1-mediated GBM cell migration and invasiveness

DISCUSSION

We report the discovery of tGLI1, a novel truncated splice variant of the transcription factor GLI1, resulting from deletion of 41 codons of the GLI1 gene. tGLI1 retains all of the known functional domains of wild-type GLI1. While not expressed in normal cells, tGLI1 is highly expressed in cell lines, xenografts and primary specimens of GBM. GBM cells engineered to express tGLI1 were significantly more migratory and invasive than their isogenic wild-type GLI1 containing counterparts. We showed that CD24, an invasion-associated gene, is a specific transcriptional target of tGLI1 and that CD24 expression is required for tGLI1-mediated GBM cell migration and invasion.

The tGLI1 splice variant identified in this study differs significantly in structure, expression patterns and physiological function, from another recently described GLI1 splice variant, GLI1DeltaN (15). First, tGLI1 not only contains a comparatively small deletion (41 codons encoding amino acid residues 34−74) but also retains all the known regulatory and functional domains of GLI1. In contrast, GLI1DeltaN contains a large N-terminal truncation of 128 amino acid residues resulting in a loss of the degron degradation signals and the N-terminal Sufu-binding domain of GLI1. In addition to the structural differences, the expression patterns of tGLI1 differ from that of GLI1DeltaN, with the former being highly expressed in malignant gliomas but not in normal cells, while the latter is expressed predominantly in normal cells, but not in GBM. With regard to their physiological function, tGLI1 behaves as a gain-of-function gene and, in contrast, GLI1DeltaN is a significantly weaker transcriptional regulator compared to GLI1.

Our findings showing that the migration/metastasis-associated CD24 gene is a direct transcriptional target of tGLI1 is the first evidence linking the Hedgehog signaling to the CD24 pathway. This finding is significant given that CD24 is over-expressed in various tumor types and has been shown to be involved in tumor cell migration, invasion and metastasis (16, 18). The fact that GBMs highly express CD24 is consistent with previous reports that suppression of CD24 expression reduced migration and invasiveness of C6 rat glioma and human GBM cells (10, 19). Despite previous reports implicating CD24 in the proliferation of breast, colon and cervical cancer cells (16, 20, 21), our results indicate that CD24 may not be a significant regulator of cell growth in GBMs. The effects of CD24 on tumor growth may be tumor type dependent.

GLI1 plays a central integrative role in various cell signaling pathways, such as, those of Hedgehog, TGF-β, EGFR, PKA and K-RAS and thereby mediates several important cellular processes involved in normal development, oncogenesis, tumor proliferation and progression (22-24). The gain of function of tGLI1 in regulating CD24 transcriptional activity and promoting GBM cell migration and invasion, its GBM-specific expression pattern, and the fact that it retains all the functional domains of GLI1, collectively, suggest that tGLI1 may be a more important mediator of GBM cellular physiology and behavior than GLI1. These results are significant given that GBM is the most frequent and deadliest brain cancer in adults and is highly infiltrative and resistant to therapy (25-27). Our findings provide a rationale for further investigations of tGLI1 in other tumors known to have active Hedgehog signaling and to be highly metastatic. The discovery of tGLI1 is, thus, highly significant and is likely to open up novel concepts of the role of GLI1 in tumor biology and may provide the basis for novel treatment strategies.

Supplementary Material

supp file

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by NIH grants, K01-CA118423 and P50CA108786, DOD grant W81XWH-07-1-0390, the Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation and the Elsa U. Pardee Foundation (to H.-W. L) and by NIH grants, RO1CA127872, RO1CA11251, 5P30CA014236-350008 and P50CA108786 (to F.A.-O.).

REFERENCE

1. Kinzler KW, Bigner SH, Bigner DD, et al. Identification of an amplified, highly expressed gene in a human glioma. Science. 1987;236:70–3. [PubMed]
2. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. The GLI gene encodes a nuclear protein which binds specific sequences in the human genome. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:634–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Clement V, Sanchez P, de Tribolet N, Radovanovic I, Ruiz i Altaba A. HEDGEHOG-GLI1 Signaling Regulates Human Glioma Growth, Cancer Stem Cell Self-Renewal, and Tumorigenicity. Current Biology. 2007;17:165–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Kasper M, Regl G, Frischauf AM, Aberger F. GLI transcription factors: mediators of oncogenic Hedgehog signalling. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:437–45. [PubMed]
5. Kogerman P, Grimm T, Kogerman L, et al. Mammalian suppressor-of-fused modulates nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of Gli-1. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:312–9. [PubMed]
6. Ehtesham M, Sarangi A, Valadez JG, et al. Ligand-dependent activation of the hedgehog pathway in glioma progenitor cells. Oncogene. 2007;26:5752–61. [PubMed]
7. Ali-Osman F, Stein DE, Renwick A. Glutathione content and glutathione-S-transferase expression in 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea-resistant human malignant astrocytoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 1990;50:6976–80. [PubMed]
8. Sasaki H, Hui C, Nakafuku M, Kondoh H. A binding site for Gli proteins is essential for HNF-3beta floor plate enhancer activity in transgenics and can respond to Shh in vitro. Development. 1997;124:1313–22. [PubMed]
9. Shulewitz M, Soloviev I, Wu T, et al. Repressor roles for TCF-4 and Sfrp1 in Wnt signaling in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:4361–9. [PubMed]
10. Fukushima T, Tezuka T, Shimomura T, Nakano S, Kataoka H. Silencing of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 in human glioblastoma cells reduces both invasiveness and expression of progression-associated gene CD24. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:18634–44. [PubMed]
11. Lo HW, Cao X, Zhu H, Ali-Osman F. Constitutively Activated STAT3 Frequently Coexpresses with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in High-Grade Gliomas and Targeting STAT3 Sensitizes Them to Iressa and Alkylators. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:6042–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Lo HW, Stephenson L, Cao X, et al. Identification and Functional Characterization of the Human Glutathione S-Transferase P1 Gene as a Novel Transcriptional Target of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:843–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Lo H-W, Hsu S-C, Ali-Seyed M, et al. Nuclear Interaction of EGFR and STAT3 in the Activation of iNOS/NO Pathway. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:575–89. [PubMed]
14. Lo HW, Hsu SC, Xia W, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer cells via up-regulation of TWIST gene expression. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9066–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Shimokawa T, Tostar U, Lauth M, et al. Novel human glioma-associated oncogene 1 (GLI1) splice variants reveal distinct mechanisms in the terminal transduction of the hedgehog signal. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14345–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Baumann P, Cremers N, Kroese F, et al. CD24 expression causes the acquisition of multiple cellular properties associated with tumor growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10783–93. [PubMed]
17. Runz S, Mierke CT, Joumaa S, et al. CD24 induces localization of beta1 integrin to lipid raft domains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;365:35–41. [PubMed]
18. Kristiansen G, Winzer KJ, Mayordomo E, et al. CD24 expression is a new prognostic marker in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:4906–13. [PubMed]
19. Senner V, Sturm A, Baur I, et al. CD24 promotes invasion of glioma cells in vivo. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58:795–802. [PubMed]
20. Kim HJ, Kim JB, Lee KM, et al. Isolation of CD24(high) and CD24(low/-) cells from MCF-7: CD24 expression is positively related with proliferation, adhesion and invasion in MCF-7. Cancer Lett. 2007;258:98–108. [PubMed]
21. Smith SC, Oxford G, Wu Z, et al. The metastasis-associated gene CD24 is regulated by Ral GTPase and is a mediator of cell proliferation and survival in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1917–22. [PubMed]
22. Ji Z, Mei FC, Xie J, Cheng X. Oncogenic KRAS activates hedgehog signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:14048–55. [PubMed]
23. Stecca B, Mas C, Clement V, et al. Melanomas require HEDGEHOG-GLI signaling regulated by interactions between GLI1 and the RAS-MEK/AKT pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5895–900. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Schnidar H, Eberl M, Klingler S, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling synergizes with Hedgehog/GLI in oncogenic transformation via activation of the MEK/ERK/JUN pathway. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1284–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Rao JS. Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: the role of proteases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:489–501. [PubMed]
26. James D, Cavenee W. Stem Cells for Treating Glioblastoma: How Close to Reality? Neuro-oncology. 2009 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Li G, Wong AJ. EGF receptor variant III as a target antigen for tumor immunotherapy. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7:977–85. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...