![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Hematopoietic stem cells depend upon Gsα-mediated signalling to engraft bone marrow 1Center for Regenerative Medicine, Center for Systems Biology and Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 2Endocrine Unit, Center for Systems Biology and Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 3Advanced Microscopy Program, Center for Systems Biology and Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 4National Institute for Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda MD 20892, USA. 5Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. 6Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. *Corresponding author Address for correspondence: David T. Scadden, MGH Center for Regenerative Medicine, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, 185 Cambridge Street (CPZN-4265A), Boston, MA 02114, Telephone: (617) 726-5615, Fax: (617) 724-2662, Email: dscadden/at/mgh.harvard.edu 7Current Address: Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at USC, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. 8Current Address: Department of Bioengineering, Graduate Schools of Engineering and Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Nature.Abstract Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) transition in location during development1 and circulate in mammals throughout life2, moving into and out of the bloodstream to engage bone marrow (BM) niches in sequential steps of homing, engraftment and retention3–5. We show here that HSPC engraftment of BM in fetal development is dependent upon the guanine nucleotide binding protein stimulatory alpha subunit (Gsα). Adult Gsα−/− HSPCs differentiate and undergo chemotaxis, but also do not home to or engraft in the BM in adult mice and demonstrate marked inability to engage the marrow microvasculature. If deleted after engraftment, Gsα did not lead to lack of retention in the marrow, rather cytokine-induced mobilization into the blood was impaired. Testing whether activation of Gsα affects HSPC, pharmacologic activators enhanced homing and engraftment in vivo. Gsα governs specific aspects of HSPC localization under physiologic conditions in vivo and may be pharmacologically targeted to improve transplantation efficiency. Gsα is essential for normal development with gene deficient embryos exhibiting fatal defects before day E10.56. To overcome this limitation, chimeric mice were generated by blastocyst injection of Gsα−/− embryonic stem cells7 injected into a blastocyst transgenic for β-galactosidase enabling resultant embryos to be assessed for tissue chimerism using in situ hybridization against neo in the targeting vector to score for Gsα−/− (KO) cells and histochemical staining for β-galactosidase to score for Gsα+/+ (WT) cells (Fig.1a
Evaluation of E13.5 fetal liver demonstrated significant chimerism with Gsα−/− cells by β-gal (48% β-gal+; Fig.1d To evaluate whether this developmental requirement was also present in adult HSPC, we crossed Gsαfl/fl mice with Mx1-Cre mice, a strain that enables high efficiency polyI.polyC induced Cre expression in HSPC. Competitive repopulation was examined using BM mononuclear cells (BM MNCs) obtained from 6 week old Gsα+/+Mx1-Cre+ or Gsαfl/flMx-1-Cre+ mice treated with polyI.polyC for 5 days (hereafter referred to as Mx1-Cre WT and Mx1-Cre KO, respectively), and transplanted in competition (1:1) with wild-type cells. Deletion of the Gsα gene in primitive cells was confirmed by PCR (Suppl. Fig.4). Analysis of the number of HSPCs in the BM MNCs, phenotypically defined as lin−c-Kit+Sca-1+Flk-2− was also identical between the Mx1-Cre WT and Mx1-Cre KO animals (WT: 0.031% +/− 0.012; KO: 0.038% +/− 0.002; p=0.545). Cells from the Mx1-Cre WT animals were able to efficiently engraft the BM, while BM MNCs from the Mx1-Cre KO mice were essentially absent from the BM at early (4 weeks) and late (16 weeks) time points following transplantation (Fig.2a A failure to successfully engraft may reflect multiple abnormalities that we sequentially examined. As others had previously found that pharmacologic modifiers of the adenylyl cyclase pathways influenced myeloid differentiation in vitro8,9, BM MNCs were obtained from Mx1-Cre WT and KO mice and progenitor cell activity was analyzed using the CFU-C assay. No significant differences were observed between the genotypes in colony number (Fig.2b
Migratory capacity was next assessed using the primitive lin−c-Kit+Sca-1+ (LKS+) or more mature lin−c-Kit+Sca-1− (LKS−) BM MNCs of Mx1-Cre WT or Mx1-Cre KO mice. In vitro chemotaxis toward SDF-1α, the only known in vitro chemotactic agent for HSPCs11, demonstrated comparable migratory capacity for each genotype of LKS+ cells for all but the lowest concentration of SDF-1α (Suppl. Fig.6a). In addition, there was no significant change in the chemotaxis of the more mature LKS− subset of cells (Suppl. Fig.6b), or lymph node lymphocytes to SDF-1α (data not shown) indicating that there was no generalized impairment of in vitro cell motility related to the Gsα defect. Primitive cells isolated from BM MNCs of Mx1-Cre WT or KO mice were then evaluated for in vivo capacity to home to the BM environment. Fluorescently-labelled LKS+ cells were injected into the peripheral circulation of mice and the numbers of cells present in the BM and spleen were measured using flow cytometry at 6 hours post-injection. Deletion of Gsα in LKS+ BM MNCs resulted in a marked impairment in their ability to home to both the BM and spleen (Fig.2d Deletion of the Gsα subunit resulted in significant reductions in the ability of primitive cells to establish hematopoiesis in the BM environment. Therefore, we examined whether the same deletion had any effects once engraftment of the cells in the BM had been achieved. To study this, BM MNCs from Gsα+/+Mx1-Cre+ or Gsαfl/flMx-1-Cre+ mice were transplanted into wild-type mice. Eight weeks following transplantation, the mice were treated with polyI.polyC to induce gene deletion (Fig.3a
Genetic alteration of Gsα signalling demonstrated a central role in BM homing of HSPCs. However, to determine if these findings might be relevant for medicine, we tested whether pharmacologic modifiers of Gsα signalling could alter stem cell function in vivo. We treated BM MNCs from wild-type C57Bl/6 mice with cholera toxin, a compound known to constitutively activate Gsα by preventing GTP hydrolysis from the ADP-ribose-Gsα-GTP complex. Using a simple ex vivo exposure of cells for 1hour, we observed increased intracellular cAMP concentrations within hematopoietic cells by ELISA (data not shown). This resulted in an enhancement in the ability of treated cells to both home and engraft in the BM with approximately two-fold increased engraftment at 16 weeks (Fig.4a,b
Elucidating the mechanisms by which HSPCs home to the BM environment has biologic and medical implications that has made it an area of intense investigation. A number of molecules have been implicated, often they were studied because of their effects on other hematopoietic populations such as lymphocytes. Here we show that Gsα plays a key role in the specific homing of HSPCs to the BM, in a manner not shared by lymphocytes. The inability of stem cells to migrate to the BM in development strongly resembles the phenotype observed with the deletion of CXCR4 or SDF-114,15. This, coupled with an impairment in SDF-1α responsive migration at specific concentrations in vitro, suggests that CXCR4 may be using Gsα as its predominant signalling pathway in that cell type. The data presented here do not rule out this possibility for fetal hematopoiesis. However, two important distinctions between the Gsα and CXCR4 null phenotypes exist for stem cell function in adult animals. First, pharmacological interruption of CXCR4 signalling results in prompt mobilization of stem cells into the circulation16. Genetic disruption of Gsα resulted in no such change in location. Indeed, G-CSF induced mobilization of cells from the BM was impaired in the absence of Gsα suggesting that egress from the marrow may be diminished. Therefore, while CXCR4 is a key component of HSPC retention in the BM17, it is not exerting its effect through Gsα. Second, CXCR4 null cells engraft in the BM, while Gsα null cells do not18. It is therefore unlikely that the role of Gsα is simply downstream of CXCR4 as this molecule is dispensable for HSPC engraftment in the transplant setting. Our results demonstrate that Gsα is critical at the HSPC homing stage, enabling engagement of the niche, however continued Gsα signalling is not required to retain the cells there. There is then meaningful molecular distinction between the homing, engraftment and retention processes. It could be hypothesized that the deficiency in the ability of the Gsα−/− cells to home to the BM could lead to a depletion of the HSPCs in the marrow space and an accumulation in the blood. However, the decreased egress from the marrow may balance the decreased ingress. Alternatively, there may be compensatory changes in resident cells that mask changes in the population. Another unknown from these studies is the potential upstream receptor utilizing this pathway. The candidates are numerous and may include adrenergic and prostaglandin receptors. The report of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) serving as a means of enhancing stem cell transplantation in mice13 indicates that this is likely at least one receptor capable of activating the pathway. Whether PGE2 mediates an effect physiologically in mammals could not be discerned from the data of North and colleagues, however, our data indicate that the downstream pathway is critical for physiologic processes in development. The localization of stem cells following transplantation is a critical determinant of success of that clinical procedure. Currently, massive numbers of stem cells are required in clinical transplantation in part due to the limited efficiency of homing and engraftment. This is particularly problematic in umbilical cord blood transplantation where the number of stem cells is limited. This problem is being approached by dual unit transplantation, an expensive undertaking that indicates how a modest (2-fold) increase in stem cells can profoundly affect clinical outcomes. Alternatives to the use of multiple unit infusions might be to increase the homing efficiency of the cells, increase the nurturing capacity of the niche or increase the number of cells by ex vivo expansion. Each approach has potential and with new information about the means of affecting each parameter, the possibility of translation to clinical trial. Transient exposure to agents stimulating Gsα is one such candidate approach. Methods Summary Gsα−/− chimeric mice Mice were created as described previously7. Gsα−/− embryonic stem cells were injected into a blastocyst transgenic for β-galactosidase. Resultant embryos were then assessed for tissue chimerism using in situ hybridization against neo to detect Gsα−/− cells or histochemical staining for β-galactosidase to detect Gsα+/+ cells. Gsα conditional knockout adult mice Gsαfl/+ mice were crossed with Mx1-Cre+ mice to create Mx1-Cre+Gsαfl/+ mice. These mice were then bred to obtain Mx1-Cre+Gsαfl/fl mice and Mx1-Cre+Gsα+/+ littermates. Deletion of the Gsα gene was achieved following exposure of the mice to polyI.polyC for 5 days. Analysis of the primitive BM MNCs used standard in vitro immunophenotyping, CFU-C, LTC-IC and chemotaxis assays, or in vivo homing and engraftment assays. Gsα deletion following engraftment Bone marrow MNCs from Gsα+/+Mx1-Cre+ or Gsαfl/flMx-1-Cre+ mice were transplanted into wild-type mice. Eight weeks following transplantation, the mice were treated with polyI.polyC to induce deletion of the gene. Peripheral blood and BM MNCs were then evealuated at various time points post-deletion. Cholera toxin treatment Bone marrow MNCs from wild-type C57Bl/6 mice were treated with cholera toxin (10µg/ml) for 1 hour ex vivo. Treated cells were then used in in vivo homing and engraftment studies. Methods Flow cytometric, CFU-C and LTC-IC analyses As described previously21,22,23. Induction of deletion Mx-1 promoter was induced by 3 intra-peritoneal injections of polyI.polyC (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) 250µg over 5 days. Deletion was confirmed by PCR. Engraftment studies For the competitive transplantation experiments, 2.5×105 BM MNCs were mixed with 2.5×105 BM MNCs cells from wild-type mice and relative contributions to hematopoiesis assessed as described previously21. In vitro transmigration Chemotaxis assays used 5 µm pore transwells (Corning-Costar Corp.). BM cells or lymph node lymphocytes (5×104) were added to the upper well. Chemotaxis towards murine SDF-1α (PeproTech Inc.) in the lower chamber was scored at 3h. Homing in vivo Purified BM cells or lymph node lymphocytes were labelled with 5 µM DiI or DiO (Molecular Probes Inc.) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were injected by tail vein and assessed by flow cytometry of BM and spleen at 6h, of lymph nodes at 24h. Cholera Toxin treatment Purified cells were resuspended in fully supplemented medium at 1×106 cells/ml. Cholera toxin (10µg/ml; Sigma) was added, incubated at 37°C for 1h, washed ×3 with PBS and used in the in vivo homing and engraftment studies. In vivo microscropy Two-photon microscopy was performed as previously described12. Video imaging was performed 30–40 minutes after intravenous injection of labelled cells for 10 minutes; supplemental movies represent a 10 second window in the middle of the recording period. Still images of cells were obtained 60 minutes after injection and cells were quantitated as stably homed if no movement was evident over a several minute observation interval. 1 Click here to view.(1.6M, pptx) 2 Click here to view.(35K, doc) Acknowledgements Financial support for this work was provided by the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Doris Duke Charitable Trust (D.T.S.), the Harvard Stem Cell Institute (C.P.L.) and the National Institutes of Health (G.B.A., C.P.L., H.M.K., D.T.S.). References 1. Mikkola HKA, Orkin SH. The journey of developing hematopoietic stem cells. Development. 2006;133:3733–3744. [PubMed] 2. Wright DE, Wagers AJ, Gulati AP, Johnson FL, Weissman IL. Physiological migration of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Science. 2001;294:1933–1936. [PubMed] 3. Mazo IB, et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell rolling in bone marrow microvessels: parallel contributions by endothelial selectins and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. J. Exp. Med. 1998;188:465–474. [PubMed] 4. Papayannopoulou T, Priestley GV, Nakamoto B, Zafiropoulos V, Scott LM. Molecular pathways in bone marrow homing: dominant role of β4β1 over β2-integrins and selectins. Blood. 2001;98:2403–2411. [PubMed] 5. Lapidot T, Dar A, Kollet O. How do stem cells find their way home? Blood. 2005;106:1901–1910. [PubMed] 6. Yu S, et al. Variable and tissue-specific hormone resistance in heterotrimeric Gs protein α-subunit (Gsα) knockout mice is due to tissue-specific imprinting of the Gsα gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:8715–8720. [PubMed] 7. Bastepe M, et al. Stimulatory G protein directly regulates hypertrophic differentiation of growth plate cartilage in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:14794–14799. [PubMed] 8. Dexter TM, Whetton AD, Heyworth CM. Inhibitors of cholera toxin-induced adenosine diphosphate ribosylation of membrane-associated proteins block stem cell differentiation. Blood. 1985;65:1544–1548. [PubMed] 9. Long MW, Heffner CH, Gragowski LL. Cholera toxin and phorbol diesters synergistically modulate murine hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation. Exp. Hematol. 1988;16:195–200. [PubMed] 10. Ploemacher RE, van der Sluijs JP, van Beurden CA, Baert MR, Chan PL. Use of limiting-dilution type long-term marrow cultures in frequency analysis of marrow-repopulating and spleen colony-forming hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse. Blood. 1991;78:2527–2533. [PubMed] 11. Wright DE, Bowman EP, Wagers AJ, Butcher EC, Weissman IL. Hematopoietic stem cells are uniquely selective in their migratory response to chemokines. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:1145–1154. [PubMed] 12. Sipkins DA, et al. In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature. 2005;435:969–973. [PubMed] 13. North TE, et al. Prostaglandin E2 regulates vertebrate haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis. Nature. 2007;447:1007–1011. [PubMed] 14. Nagasawa T, et al. Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1. Nature. 1996;382:635–638. [PubMed] 15. Ma Q, et al. Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:9448–9453. [PubMed] 16. Broxmeyer HE, et al. AMD3100 and CD26 modulate mobilization, engraftment, and survival of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells mediated by the SDF-1/CXCL12-CXCR4 axis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1106:1–19. [PubMed] 17. Foudi A, et al. Reduced retention of radioprotective hematopoietic cells within the bone marrow microenvironment in CXCR4−/− chimeric mice. Blood. 2006;107:2243–2251. [PubMed] 18. Kawabata K, et al. A cell-autonomous requirement for CXCR4 in long-term lymphoid and myeloid reconstitution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:5663–5667. [PubMed] Methods References 19. Calvi LM, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–846. [PubMed] 20. Cheng T, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence maintained by p21cip1/waf1. Science. 2000;287:1804–1808. [PubMed] 21. Stier S, Cheng T, Dombkowski D, Carlesso N, Scadden DT. Notch1 activation increases hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal in vivo and favors lymphoid over myeloid lineage outcome. Blood. 2002;99:2369–2378. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Development. 2006 Oct; 133(19):3733-44.
[Development. 2006]Science. 2001 Nov 30; 294(5548):1933-6.
[Science. 2001]J Exp Med. 1998 Aug 3; 188(3):465-74.
[J Exp Med. 1998]Blood. 2005 Sep 15; 106(6):1901-10.
[Blood. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21; 95(15):8715-20.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12; 101(41):14794-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Blood. 1985 Jun; 65(6):1544-8.
[Blood. 1985]Exp Hematol. 1988 Mar; 16(3):195-200.
[Exp Hematol. 1988]Blood. 1991 Nov 15; 78(10):2527-33.
[Blood. 1991]J Exp Med. 2002 May 6; 195(9):1145-54.
[J Exp Med. 2002]Nature. 2005 Jun 16; 435(7044):969-73.
[Nature. 2005]Nature. 2007 Jun 21; 447(7147):1007-11.
[Nature. 2007]Nature. 1996 Aug 15; 382(6592):635-8.
[Nature. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 4; 95(16):9448-53.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Jun; 1106():1-19.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007]Blood. 2006 Mar 15; 107(6):2243-51.
[Blood. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11; 96(10):5663-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Nature. 2007 Jun 21; 447(7147):1007-11.
[Nature. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12; 101(41):14794-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Blood. 2002 Apr 1; 99(7):2369-78.
[Blood. 2002]Blood. 2002 Apr 1; 99(7):2369-78.
[Blood. 2002]Nature. 2005 Jun 16; 435(7044):969-73.
[Nature. 2005]