![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
An FGF–WNT gene regulatory network controls lung mesenchyme development aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8103, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA *Corresponding author. Fax: +1 314 362 7058. E-mail address: Email: dornitz/at/wustl.edu (D.M. Ornitz) Abstract Lung mesenchyme is a critical determinant of the shape and size of the lung, the extent and patterning of epithelial branching, and the formation of the pulmonary vasculature and interstitial mesenchymal components of the adult lung. Fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9) is a critical regulator of lung mesenchymal growth; however, upstream mechanisms that modulate the FGF mesenchymal signal and the downstream targets of mesenchymal FGF signaling are poorly understood. Here we have identified a robust regulatory network in which mesenchymal FGF signaling regulates β-Catenin mediated WNT signaling in lung mesenchyme. By conditionally inactivating β-Catenin in lung mesenchyme, we show that mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling is essential for lung development and acts to regulate the cell cycle G1 to S transition and the FGF responsiveness of mesenchyme. Together, both FGF and WNT signaling pathways function to sustain mesenchymal growth and coordinate epithelial morphogenesis during the pseudoglandular stage of lung development. Keywords: Fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9), Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), Wnt2a, Wnt7b, β-Catenin, Lung development, Mesenchyme Introduction Mouse lung development is initiated on embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) with the formation of two endodermal buds off the ventrolateral foregut. Lung buds invade the surrounding splanchnic mesoderm and overlying mesothelium to establish a lung primordium initially composed of three tissue layers, epithelium (endoderm), mesoderm and mesothelium (Hogan, 1999). As the lung buds grow and enter the pseudoglandular stage of development (E9.5–16), the mesenchyme forms two morphologically and molecularly distinct layers, the sub-mesothelial layer and the sub-epithelial layer (White et al., 2006). These mesenchymal layers express unique intercellular signaling molecules, such as WNT2a and FGF10 in the sub-mesothelial layer and Noggin in the sub-epithelial layer (Bellusci et al., 1996; Mailleux et al., 2005; Weaver et al., 2003; White et al., 2006). Growth and morphogenesis of the lung require intercellular signaling interactions between all primary cell layers of the lung (Cardoso and Lu, 2006; Shannon and Hyatt, 2004; Warburton et al., 2005). Fgf9 is expressed in the outermost layer of the lung, the mesothelium, and in lung epithelium, and has been identified as a key factor that signals to mesenchyme to regulate proliferation, differentiation and the expression of other factors that in turn regulate epithelial development (Colvin et al., 1999; Colvin et al., 2001). Mesenchymal forms of FGF receptors 1 and 2 have been shown to mediate the FGF9 signal (White et al., 2006). Epithelial FGFs, such as FGF9, often regulate the expression of mesenchymal FGFs and other signaling molecules that in turn regulate epithelial and mesenchymal development. In a screen of candidate genes that are expressed in lung mesenchyme and that could be regulated by mesenchymal FGF signaling, Wnt2a was found to be significantly down-regulated in lungs of mice lacking Fgf9 (Fgf9−/−) (see Fig. 1
WNT signaling is essential for embryonic patterning and cell fate determination (Moon, 2005). At least three intracellular signaling pathways mediate WNT signaling, the WNT-β-Catenin pathway, the WNT/Ca2+ pathway and the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway. WNT-β-Catenin signaling through frizzled (FZ) receptors and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) 5 and 6 co-receptors lead to activation of disheveled (DVL), inhibition of GSK3β, and stabilization and cytosolic accumulation of β-Catenin. Increased cytosolic levels of β-Catenin lead to its nuclear translocation and to the formation of active transcription factor complexes of β-Catenin with members of the T Cell Factor (LEF1, TCF1, TCF3, TCF4) transcription factor family, PITX2 and SOX17 (Brantjes et al., 2002; Briata et al., 2003; Kioussi et al., 2002; Vadlamudi et al., 2005; Zorn et al., 1999). Downstream targets of WNT-β-Catenin signaling include the cell cycle regulator, CyclinD1, and transcription factors, N-myc, Lef1 and Pitx2 (Hovanes et al., 2001; Kioussi et al., 2002; Shu et al., 2005; Tetsu and McCormick, 1999). In embryonic lung, nuclear β-Catenin, LEF1 and PITX2 have been detected in the epithelium and in adjacent mesenchyme (Hjalt et al., 2000; Mucenski et al., 2003; Tebar et al., 2001). Similarly, TOPGAL and BATGAL, WNT-β-Catenin reporter genes that detect a subset of sites of WNT-β-Catenin activity, are active in lung epithelium and in adjacent mesenchyme (De Langhe et al., 2005; Maretto et al., 2003; Okubo and Hogan, 2004; Pongracz and Stockley, 2006; Shu et al., 2005). WNT-β-Catenin signaling has been investigated in lung epithelium through conditional inactivation of β-Catenin or overexpression of the WNT signaling antagonist dickkopf1 (DKK1). Both approaches resulted in defects in distal lung bud formation, possibly due to disruption of FGF10-FGFR2b signaling (Mucenski et al., 2003; Shu et al., 2005). Three Wnts (Wnt2a, Wnt2b, Wnt7b) that typically signal through the WNT-β-Catenin pathway are expressed during lung development. Inactivation of Wnt7b, which is expressed in distal lung epithelium, results in severe lung hypoplasia due to defects in branching morphogenesis, cell proliferation, epithelial differentiation and loss of vascular smooth muscle integrity (Shu et al., 2002). Wnt2a is highly expressed in the distal mesenchyme (Bellusci et al., 1996; Monkley et al., 1996) but Wnt2a targeted mice were reported to have normal lung development (Monkley et al., 1996). Wnt2b (formerly called Wnt13) is also expressed in lung mesenchyme during early stages of lung development (Katoh et al., 1996; Katoh et al., 2000; Zakin et al., 1998). This leaves open the possibility of functional redundancy between these two related and similarly expressed genes. Two Wnts (Wnt5a, Wnt11) that typically signal through non-canonical pathways are expressed in lung epithelium and mesenchyme. Wnt5a is expressed in lung epithelium and adjacent mesenchyme and inactivation of Wnt5a leads to over-branching of the epithelial airway and thickening of the mesenchymal interstitium (Li et al., 2005, 2002). Wnt11 is expressed both in the lung epithelium and mesenchyme, but its function during lung development is not clear (Lako et al., 1998). Although WNT-β-Catenin signaling is clearly important for lung epithelial development, its role in lung mesenchyme has not been directly examined. Here we identify an essential role for mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling by conditionally inactivating β-Catenin specifically in lung mesenchyme. We furthermore identify a reciprocal signaling loop in lung mesenchyme in which mesothelial/epithelial to mesenchymal FGF signals regulate Wnt2a expression and WNT-β-Catenin signaling, and mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling regulates FGFR1 and FGFR2 expression and, consequently, the level of FGF signaling. Disruption of any component of this signaling network results in defects in lung mesenchymal development and consequent defects in epithelial morphogenesis. Materials and methods Mouse strains All mouse strains, including Fgf9+/−, β-Cateninf/f, Dermo1-Cre, TRE-Fgf9-IRES-eGfp, SPC-rtTA, Fgfr1f/f, Fgfr2f/f (f indicates a floxed allele) and Rosa26 reporter (R26R), have been previously described (Brault et al., 2001; Colvin et al., 2001; Soriano, 1999; Tichelaar et al., 2000; Trokovic et al., 2003; White et al., 2006; Yu et al., 2003). Fgfr1/2Dermo1 conditional knockout mice (Dermo1Cre/+, Fgfr1f/f, Fgfr2f/f) and Fgf9dox(48) mice (SPC-rtTA, TRE-Fgf9-IRES-eGfp) were made as described (Perl et al., 2002; White et al., 2006). The β-Cateninf/f strain was acquired through the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). For conditional inactivation of β-Catenin in lung mesenchyme, mice were generated with the genotype, Dermo1Cre/+, β-Cateninf/f (referred to as β-CateninDermo1) by mating Dermo1Cre/+, β-Cateninf/+ mice with β-Cateninf/f. Control mice were of the genotype Dermo1Cre/+; Dermo1Cre/+, β-Cateninf/+; β-Cateninf/f; or β-Cateninf/+, all of which were phenotypically identical to wild type mice. All loss of function mice were maintained on a mixed 129SV/J-C57B6/J background. Transgenic strains, used for gain of function experiments, were maintained on the FVB background. Analyses of mouse embryos, histology and immunohistochemistry To induce FGF9 expression in vivo, the doxycycline-inducible epithelial transcriptional activator (SP-C-rtTA) was used to induce a tetracycline responsive transgene driving FGF9 (Perl et al., 2002; White et al., 2006). Doxycycline chow (Bio-Serv Inc., 300 mg/kg green pellets) was administered to pregnant female mice for 48 h prior to embryo isolation (Fgf9dox(48)). Embryo tissues were collected in ice-cold PBS, fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C, washed with PBS, photographed and embedded in paraffin prior to sectioning at 5 µm. For histology, slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For immunohistochemistry, paraffin-embedded or cryo-sections were rehydrated and treated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 15 min to suppress the endogenous peroxidase activity. Antigen retrieval was achieved by microwaving the sections in 10 mM citrate buffer for 5 min followed by gradual cooling to room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: PCNA (sc-56, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, 1:100); β-Catenin (610153, BD Transduction Laboratories, 1:200); LEF1 (sc-8591, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, 1:100); BrdU (347580, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, 1:200); phospho-histone H3 (pHH3, H9908, Sigma, 1:100); FGFR2 (sc-122, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, 1:100); CyclinD1 (#2926, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:100); phospho-ERK (M8159, Sigma, 1:100), and TTF-1 (M3575, DAKO Cytomation, 1:100), visualized using Broad Spectrom (AEC) Kit (95-9743, Zymed Laboratories Inc.) or Vectastain® Elite ABC (AEC) kit (PK-4005, Vector Laboratories). For BrdU analysis, pregnant females were injected with BrdU at 0.1 mg/kg body weight, 2 h prior to harvest. Embryos were collected in ice-cold PBS, processed and sectioned as above. All staining patterns are representative of at least three embryos. Cell death analysis Paraffin or cryo-sectioned slides, prepared as described above, were assayed (TUNEL) using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Applied Science). Slides were mounted with DAPI containing Vectashield® mounting medium (H-1200, Vector Laboratories) for fluorescent detection or counterstained with hematoxylin (MHS-16, Sigma) for AEC detection and then photographed. All staining patterns are representative of at least three embryos. Whole-mount in situ hybridization In situ probes were from the following sources: Lef1, Wnt2a (A. McMahon), Wnt7b (F. Long); Fgf10 (B. Hogan); Spry2; Fgfr1 (S. Werner); N-Myc (E. Morrisey). Probes were synthesized and labeled with a kit from Roche Applied Science. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described (Colvin et al., 2001). Following color reaction and methanol dehydration, tissues were photographed and then cryo-sectioned (6 µm), mounted on slides and re-photographed. In situ hybridizations of tissue sections were performed as previously described (Colvin et al., 1999). All staining patterns are representative of at least three embryos. Whole-mount LacZ staining Lungs were dissected in ice-cold PBS and fixed with 0.5% glutaraldehyde in PBT (PBS, 0.1% Tween-20) overnight at 4 °C. Tissues were washed in PBT twice for 10 min prior to incubation with LacZ staining solution (2 mM MgCl2, 35 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 35 mM potassium ferricyanide, 1 mg/ml X-Gal in PBT) at room temperature in the dark. Following adequate color reaction, tissues were again washed twice in PBT for 10 min each to stop the reaction. Samples were then soaked in 30% sucrose overnight, photographed and then embedded and frozen in OTC for cryosectioning (6 µM). Sections were dried for ~3 h at room temperature, washed with PBS and mounted. All staining patterns are representative of at least three embryos. Lung organ cultures Lung explant cultures were performed as described (White et al., 2006). E11.5 control, Fgf9−/− and β-CateninDermo1 embryonic lungs were dissected and cultured on Transwell filters (Costar, Corning) for 48 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Mouse FGF9 protein (PeproTech Inc.) was used at a concentration of 2.5 ng/ml in DMEM supplemented with 2 µg/ml heparin. LiCl was used at a concentration of 20 mM (Dean et al., 2005). To quantify mesenchymal thickness, explants were photographed and mesenchymal thickness was measured using Canvas X software. Data shown is representative of at least three independent experiments. RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR analysis E14.5 embryonic lung mRNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen Inc.) following manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript II first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on an ABI 7500 machine using TaqMan® probes for Gapdh and Fgfr2. Amplification and analysis were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. All reactions were normalized to Gapdh. Results were graphed as relative expression compared with control, where control was scaled to 1. Construction of a Fgfr2 promoter-luciferase reporter A mouse genomic DNA fragment extending 6.8 kb 5′ and 533 bp 3′ to the Fgfr2 transcription initiation site was excised from BAC DNA (RP23-466 J2) with BamH1 and subcloned into the pGL3 basic vector (Promega Inc.) to generate pGL3-Fgfr2p. This fragment contains Fgfr2 exon 1 and part of intron 1. The pCIG-dominant active β-Catenin vector (0.2 µg) or control vector (pCIG) (Megason and McMahon, 2002) was co-transfected into HEK293 cells with pGL3-Fgfr2p and pCMV-β-Gal (Promega) using Fugene 6 (Roche Applied Science). Luciferase assay was performed 48 h after transfection using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega). All data were normalized to β-Gal activity. Data represents four independent experiments. Positive controls (not shown), using the TOPFLASH reporter, demonstrated activation of WNT signaling. Results FGF9 regulates WNT signaling in lung mesenchyme Wnt2a is prominently expressed in lung mesenchyme and has been shown to signal through the WNT-β-Catenin pathway (Bellusci et al., 1996; Karasawa et al., 2002). Examination of E13.5 lung tissue from mice lacking FGF9 (Fgf9−/− mice) demonstrated a complete absence of Wnt2a expression in lung mesenchyme (Figs. 1A, B FGF receptors 1 and 2 have been shown to act redundantly to mediate the FGF9 signal in lung mesenchyme (White et al., 2006).We thus hypothesized that inhibition of mesenchymal FGF receptors should also result in decreased mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling. To test this hypothesis directly, we conditionally inactivated floxed alleles of both Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 in the lung mesenchyme with Dermo1-Cre and then examined the expression of Wnt2a and Lef1. Dermo1-Cre is active in lung mesenchyme and mesothelium, but not epithelium. By E10.5, Dermo1-Cre can efficiently activate the ROSA26 reporter allele (R26R) and β-galactosidase activity throughout lung mesenchyme and mesothelium (see Fig. 3J
Mesenchymal β-Catenin is essential for embryonic lung development To directly investigate the role of mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling in embryonic lung development, β-Catenin (β-Catenin f/f) (Brault et al., 2001) was conditionally targeted in lung mesenchyme with Dermo1-Cre (Yu et al., 2003). Mice of the genotype Dermo1Cre/+, β-Cateninf/f, hereafter referred to as β-CateninDermo1, showed impaired lung growth as early as E12.5 (Fig. 3A To examine the efficiency and specificity of β-Catenin inactivation, immunohistochemistry was used to localize β-Catenin protein. Control lung tissue showed uniform staining for β-Catenin in both epithelium and mesenchyme, while β-CateninDermo1 lungs showed greatly reduced staining in lung mesenchyme as early as E12.5 (Figs. 3K, L
To determine whether lung epithelial WNT-β-Catenin signaling was affected by inactivation of β-Catenin in lung mesenchyme, N-Myc expression was examined. N-Myc is expressed in lung epithelium and is a gene known to be regulated by epithelial WNT-β-Catenin signaling (Shu et al., 2005). In situ hybridization analysis showed that, at E12.5, N-Myc expression was not significantly affected by inactivation of lung mesenchymal β-Catenin (Figs. 4I, J Mesenchymal β-Catenin is required for proliferation and survival of lung mesenchymal and epithelial cells The smaller size of β-CateninDermo1 lungs between E12.5 and E14.5, and the failure to grow after E14.5, suggested that inactivation of β-Catenin may lead to decreased proliferation or increased cell death in lung mesenchyme and may secondarily affect growth and survival of lung epithelium. We assessed cell proliferation by examining expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), as well as incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). PCNA labels all cycling cells, while BrdU specifically labels cells that are within S phase during the labeling period. At E12.5 and E14.5, BrdU labeling was significantly decreased in β-CateninDermo1 lung tissue compared to control (Figs. 5A–D
D type Cyclins are required for progression through the cell cycle (Baldin et al., 1993) and their expression is controlled by extracellular growth factors, including members of the WNT and FGF family (Issack and Ziff, 1998; Lobjois et al., 2004). At E12.5 and E14.5, Cyclin D1 expression was reduced in β-CateninDermo1 lung mesenchyme and epithelium (Figs. 5I–L Cell death was examined by TUNEL labeling. At E12.5 and E14.5, no significant increase in cell death was detected in β-CateninDermo1 lung tissue (Figs. 5M–P Taken together, these data demonstrate that mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling is essential for maintaining lung mesenchymal proliferation. This could be a direct consequence of WNT regulation of cell cycle genes or an indirect effect mediated through regulation of other signaling pathways. Additionally, non-autonomous effects on lung epithelial proliferation suggest loss of a mesenchymal-derived signal to epithelial cells. Epithelial identity and signaling in β-CateninDermo1 lung To further examine lung epithelial function in β-CateninDermo1 lung, Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 (TTF1) and Surfactant Protein-C (SP-C) expression was examined. TTF1 is essential for epithelial cell development (Cardoso and Lu, 2006) and SP-C is expressed in distal lung epithelium (Weaver et al., 1999). Immunostaining for TTF1 demonstrated expression in epithelial cell nuclei at near normal levels at E12.5 and E14.5 in β-CateninDermo1 lung (Figs. 6A–D
FGF10 is an essential factor for lung epithelial branching. Focal Fgf10 expression is observed in mesenchyme at the distal tip of the prospective lung lobes starting at ~E10.0 and in distal mesenchyme adjacent to budding airway epithelium at later stages (Bellusci et al., 1997). Expression patterns of Fgf10 were examined to determine whether altered FGF10 expression could account for some of the epithelial phenotypes observed in β-CateninDermo1 lung. At E12.0 and E14.5, control and β-CateninDermo1 lungs exhibited comparable expression patterns and levels of Fgf10 in mesenchyme distal to budding airways (Figs. 6E–H WNT-β-Catenin signaling regulates FGF receptor expression and function in lung mesenchyme Mesenchymal proliferation is decreased in Fgf9−/−, Fgfr1/2Dermo1 and in β-CateninDermo1 lung tissue. We hypothesized that the proliferation defect in β-CateninDermo1 lung mesenchyme might be mediated in part through regulation of FGF signaling. Fgfr1 and FGFR2 expression was therefore examined. Immunostaining of E12.5 lung showed decreased expression of FGFR2 in β-CateninDermo1 lung mesenchyme but not in epithelium (Figs. 7A, B
To further examine the regulation of lung mesenchymal Fgfr2 expression by mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling, we examined expression of Fgfr2 in E14.5 lung tissue from control and β-CateninDermo1 mice by quantitative RT-PCR. In the absence of mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling, Fgfr2 showed 4.6 fold lower expression (Fig. 7E Fgfr1 mRNA expression was examined by whole-mount in situ hybridization. Fgfr1 showed reduced expression in lung mesenchyme at E12.5 (Figs. 7H, I If decreased mesenchymal FGFR expression in β-CateninDermo1 lung was functionally important, one would predict that β-CateninDermo1 lungs would have impaired responsiveness to FGF ligands that primarily signal to mesenchymal FGFRs. To test this, lung explant cultures from control and β-CateninDermo1 lungs were treated with BSA or FGF9 (Figs. 8A–E
Another prediction that arises from this regulatory network model is that, in the absence of FGF9, the feedback loop that maintains WNT-β-Catenin signaling and Fgfr expression should degrade and lung explants from Fgf9−/− embryos should not be able to be rescued by treatment with FGF9. Consistent with this prediction, Fgf9−/− lung explants showed no mesenchymal response to FGF9 (Figs. 8H–J Discussion We have identified a robust regulatory circuit in which epithelial to mesenchymal FGF signaling regulates the expression of a Wnt ligand and the level of WNT-β-Catenin signaling, and in which mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling regulates the expression of FGF receptors and the level of mesenchymal FGF signaling (Fig. 9
Two predictions can be derived from the FGF–WNT interaction model (Fig. 9 Wnt7b is expressed in lung epithelium (Pepicelli et al., 1998; Weidenfeld et al., 2002). Wnt7b−/− embryos have reduced lung mesenchymal proliferation and defects in lung vascular smooth muscle (Shu et al., 2002). It is, therefore, likely that WNT7b signals directly to adjacent sub-epithelial mesenchyme and acts synergistically or redundantly with WNT2a (Fig. 9 Lef1, a target of WNT-β-Catenin signaling, appears to be uniformly expressed throughout distal mesenchyme. This suggests that Wnt2a, which is expressed in sub-mesothelial mesenchyme, might support both autocrine signaling to sub-mesothelial mesenchyme and paracrine signaling to sub-epithelial mesenchyme. Although a lung mesenchymal phenotype was not reported for Wnt2a−/− mice (Monkley et al., 1996) and the original knockout line was not saved, a second, recently constructed line of Wnt2a−/− mice shows decreased lung mesenchymal proliferation (E. Morrisey, personal communication). Additionally, Wnt7b−/− mice show decreased lung mesenchymal proliferation (Shu et al., 2002). These data support a potential role for these ligands acting together in the regulation of mesenchymal WNT-β-Catenin signaling. To demonstrate this in vivo, future epistasis studies will be required in which Wnt2a and Wnt7b double heterozygous mice are examined. To address the contribution of WNT-β-Catenin signaling in lung epithelium, several labs have conditionally inactivated β-Catenin in epithelium or overexpressed the WNT antagonist, DKK, in epithelium (De Langhe et al., 2005; Mucenski et al., 2003; Shu et al., 2005). These studies showed that WNT-β-Catenin signaling regulates the expression of N-Myc, Bmp4 and Fgfr2b in lung epithelium and regulates the extent of branching morphogenesis. Down-regulation of epithelial Fgfr2b could account for the observed defects in branching morphogenesis in these mice. Importantly, the identity of the WNT ligand(s) that regulates epithelial WNT-β-Catenin signaling is not known; however, in addition to activating FZD1, 4 and 7 in lung mesenchyme, WNT7b can activate FZD10, which is expressed in lung epithelium (Wang et al., 2005). A possible autocrine role for WNT7b in epithelium is supported by observed defective epithelial differentiation in Wnt7b−/− lung tissue (Shu et al., 2002). In summary, FGF9, and most likely WNT7b, are two ligands that can independently signal from mesothelial (FGF9) and epithelial (FGF9 and WNT7b) cells to lung mesenchyme to regulate growth. The positive feedback loop within the mesenchymal compartment (Wnt2a, FGFR1, FGFR2 and β-Catenin) allows input from both FGF and WNT signaling systems to modulate the output of the entire system, thus providing a mechanism to tightly regulate mesenchymal lung development and, indirectly, epithelial morphogenesis. Supplementary data: Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.04.009. Click here to view.(1.4M, pdf) Acknowledgments We thank J. Partanen for the Fgfr1f/f mouse line. We thank C. Smith and G. Schmid for animal husbandry and genotyping. This work was funded by the Washington University Cardiovascular Pharmacology Training Grant T32 HL07873 (ACW), the Digestive Diseases Research Core Center Grant P30 DK052574 (transgenic mouse production) and a grant from the March of Dimes Foundation (1FY06-339). References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cell. 1999 Jan 22; 96(2):225-33.
[Cell. 1999]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Development. 1996 Jun; 122(6):1693-702.
[Development. 1996]Development. 2005 May; 132(9):2157-66.
[Development. 2005]Dev Biol. 2003 Jun 1; 258(1):169-84.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Dev Dyn. 1999 Sep; 216(1):72-88.
[Dev Dyn. 1999]Development. 2001 Jun; 128(11):2095-106.
[Development. 2001]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Biol Chem. 2002 Feb; 383(2):255-61.
[Biol Chem. 2002]Mol Cell. 2003 Nov; 12(5):1201-11.
[Mol Cell. 2003]Cell. 2002 Nov 27; 111(5):673-85.
[Cell. 2002]J Cell Sci. 2005 Mar 15; 118(Pt 6):1129-37.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]Mol Cell. 1999 Oct; 4(4):487-98.
[Mol Cell. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 10; 278(41):40231-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Dev Biol. 2005 Jul 1; 283(1):226-39.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Development. 2002 Oct; 129(20):4831-42.
[Development. 2002]Development. 1996 Jun; 122(6):1693-702.
[Development. 1996]Development. 1996 Nov; 122(11):3343-53.
[Development. 1996]Development. 2001 Apr; 128(8):1253-64.
[Development. 2001]Development. 2001 Jun; 128(11):2095-106.
[Development. 2001]Nat Genet. 1999 Jan; 21(1):70-1.
[Nat Genet. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2000 Apr 21; 275(16):11858-64.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]EMBO J. 2003 Apr 15; 22(8):1811-23.
[EMBO J. 2003]Transgenic Res. 2002 Feb; 11(1):21-9.
[Transgenic Res. 2002]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Development. 2001 Jun; 128(11):2095-106.
[Development. 2001]Dev Dyn. 1999 Sep; 216(1):72-88.
[Dev Dyn. 1999]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Dev Biol. 2005 Oct 1; 286(1):270-86.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Development. 2002 May; 129(9):2087-98.
[Development. 2002]Development. 1996 Jun; 122(6):1693-702.
[Development. 1996]J Biol Chem. 2002 Oct 4; 277(40):37479-86.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Oncogene. 1997 Dec 4; 15(23):2833-9.
[Oncogene. 1997]Mech Dev. 2001 Dec; 109(2):437-40.
[Mech Dev. 2001]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Development. 2001 Apr; 128(8):1253-64.
[Development. 2001]Development. 2003 Jul; 130(13):3063-74.
[Development. 2003]Dev Biol. 2005 Jul 1; 283(1):226-39.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Genes Dev. 1993 May; 7(5):812-21.
[Genes Dev. 1993]Cell Growth Differ. 1998 Oct; 9(10):837-45.
[Cell Growth Differ. 1998]Dev Biol. 2004 Sep 15; 273(2):195-209.
[Dev Biol. 2004]Development. 2006 May; 133(9):1611-24.
[Development. 2006]Development. 1999 Sep; 126(18):4005-15.
[Development. 1999]Development. 1997 Dec; 124(23):4867-78.
[Development. 1997]Mech Dev. 2001 Apr; 102(1-2):81-94.
[Mech Dev. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6; 93(16):8455-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Dev Biol. 2006 May 1; 293(1):77-89.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Development. 2001 Jun; 128(11):2095-106.
[Development. 2001]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]Curr Biol. 1998 Sep 24; 8(19):1083-6.
[Curr Biol. 1998]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jun 7; 277(23):21061-70.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Development. 2002 Oct; 129(20):4831-42.
[Development. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Jun; 25(12):5022-30.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2005]Development. 1996 Nov; 122(11):3343-53.
[Development. 1996]Development. 2002 Oct; 129(20):4831-42.
[Development. 2002]Dev Biol. 2005 Jan 15; 277(2):316-31.
[Dev Biol. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 10; 278(41):40231-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Dev Biol. 2005 Jul 1; 283(1):226-39.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Jun; 25(12):5022-30.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2005]Development. 2002 Oct; 129(20):4831-42.
[Development. 2002]Development. 2001 Jun; 128(11):2095-106.
[Development. 2001]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1507-17.
[Development. 2006]