![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 The Author(s). Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance 1Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, 3010 VIC, Australia 2Plant Cell Biology Research Centre, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, 3010 VIC, Australia 3Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, 5064 SA, Australia †To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: u.roessner/at/unimelb.edu.au *Present address: Crop Production and Environment Division, Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences, 1-1, Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. Received May 27, 2009; Revised July 9, 2009; Accepted July 13, 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details) Abstract Plants show varied cellular responses to salinity that are partly associated with maintaining low cytosolic Na+ levels and a high K+/Na+ ratio. Plant metabolites change with elevated Na+, some changes are likely to help restore osmotic balance while others protect Na+-sensitive proteins. Metabolic responses to salt stress are described for two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differed in salinity tolerance under the experimental conditions used. After 3 weeks of salt treatment, Clipper ceased growing whereas Sahara resumed growth similar to the control plants. Compared with Clipper, Sahara had significantly higher leaf Na+ levels and less leaf necrosis, suggesting they are more tolerant to accumulated Na+. Metabolite changes in response to the salt treatment also differed between the two cultivars. Clipper plants had elevated levels of amino acids, including proline and GABA, and the polyamine putrescine, consistent with earlier suggestions that such accumulation may be correlated with slower growth and/or leaf necrosis rather than being an adaptive response to salinity. It is suggested that these metabolites may be an indicator of general cellular damage in plants. By contrast, in the more tolerant Sahara plants, the levels of the hexose phosphates, TCA cycle intermediates, and metabolites involved in cellular protection increased in response to salt. These solutes remain unchanged in the more sensitive Clipper plants. It is proposed that these responses in the more tolerant Sahara are involved in cellular protection in the leaves and are involved in the tolerance of Sahara leaves to high Na+. Keywords: Barley, GC-MS, metabolomics, salt stress, tissue tolerance Introduction Plants respond in many ways to salinity and at a number of levels (Munns and Tester, 2008). For example, extensive investigations of salt stress responses using transcriptomics approaches have been described for rice (Walia et al., 2005, 2007; Kumari et al., 2009) and Lotus japonicus (Sanchez et al., 2008b). Complementing these studies are detailed analyses of changes of the proteome following salt stress in Arabidopsis (Jiang et al., 2007), rice (Nohzadeh Malakshah et al., 2007; Zang and Komatsu, 2007), potato (Aghaei et al., 2008), and Physcomitrella patens (Wang et al., 2008). It is expected that exposure of plants to salinity will also result in a wide range of metabolic responses. While changes in levels of several metabolites following salt stress are well documented, less well documented are the changes that occur in the metabolome overall (Zuther et al., 2007; Sanchez et al., 2008a, b). One of the best described metabolic responses is the increase in intracellular concentration of a range of soluble, neutral organic compounds that are collectively termed ‘compatible solutes’ (Bohnert et al., 1995; Bohnert and Shen, 1998). Compatible solutes are small hydrophilic molecules that are non-toxic (thus ‘compatible’) and do not perturb cellular functions even when present in high concentrations (Yancey, 2005). Increased concentrations of compatible solutes in the cytoplasm can contribute to reducing the water potential in the cytoplasm by balancing the decreased water potential associated with Na+ accumulation in the vacuoles and the extracellular volume. These neutral organic compounds can also alleviate the inhibitory effects of high ion concentrations on enzymatic activity without interfering with protein structure and function. For example, they may act as antioxidants in scavenging free radicals (Smirnoff and Cumbes, 1989), and can help stabilize membranes (Hare et al., 1998). The most common compatible solutes in plants are polyhydroxy compounds (sucrose, oligosaccharides, and polyhydric alcohols) and nitrogen-containing compounds (proline, other amino acids, quaternary ammonium compounds, and polyamines) (Bohnert et al., 1995; Hare et al., 1998). However, it is noteworthy that increases in amino acid concentrations have been attributed simply to arising from the decrease in growth rate that results from stress (Munns, 2002). Such accumulation may not, therefore, be an adaptive response to salinity but simply a secondary consequence of reduced growth. Other effects of salinity on metabolism and metabolite levels include changes in photosynthesis and respiration (Chaves et al., 2009; Lawlor and Tezara, 2009). Photosynthetic responses to salinity stress are highly complex and affect processes at a range of levels in the leaf. The intensity, duration, and speed of onset of the stress will all influence the way the plant responds to reduced water availability due to salinity. A reduction of photosynthetic activity will limit the availability of energy and photoassimilate for metabolism, resulting in increased catabolism of stored carbohydrates via respiration in order to provide cells with energy. Under conditions of long-term salt stress, when damage may have been caused and cells show symptoms of necrosis, other effects of salinity may also influence metabolism (Flexas et al., 2004; Chaves et al., 2009). Comparisons of data from transcript analyses following drought or salt stress show that plants respond by changing gene expression as well as physiological and biochemical processes (Chaves et al., 2009). Most apparent is that drought and, to a greater extent, salinity stress both result in reduced expression of photosynthetic genes (for a review, see Chaves et al., 2009). When grown under conditions of environmental stress, the metabolic homeostasis of plants is disrupted and altered. For example, the response to increased salt involves dramatic changes in the activity of a number of genes and proteins which ultimately lead to changes in plant metabolism. The application of metabolomics technologies for a more comprehensive cellular metabolite analysis offers a rational approach to investigate the implications of these metabolic alterations on a broad scale. Metabolomics employs a range of analytical technologies (mass spectrometry (MS)- or NMR-based techniques), the most common of which is GC-MS which allows rapid, non-biased, and simultaneous analysis of a large number of small molecules (Kopka et al., 2004; Roessner, 2007; Roessner and Beckles, 2009). Studies of plant responses to salinity stress and the differences between salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant species using metabolomics approaches have revealed an interesting diversity of patterns (for a review, see Sanchez et al., 2008a). First, there are differences in constitutive levels of metabolites between tolerant and sensitive varieties/species; and, second, different species show conserved as well as divergent metabolite responses in response to salinity. These patterns have been demonstrated through the comparison of Arabidopsis thaliana with its salt-tolerant relative Thellungiella halophila (Gong et al., 2005) as well as when a range of different rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars with different levels of salinity tolerance were compared (Zuther et al., 2007). Under control conditions, the salt-tolerant T. halophila had higher levels of sucrose, fructose, glucose, proline, citrate, malate, and succinate compared with Arabidopsis. However, following salt stress, T. halophila showed greater increases in inositol, galactinol, and raffinose and reductions in fumarate, malate, phosphate, and aspartate than did Arabidopsis (Gong et al., 2005). Zuther et al. (2007) demonstrated a clear separation of the metabolic phenotypes of sensitive and tolerant rice cultivars which was more obvious in the root than the leaf. The roots of the more tolerant varieties had lower levels of the TCA cycle intermediates and other organic acids, and higher amino acid levels. Increases in certain amino acids (including proline), sugars (including sucrose, fructose, and glucose) and polyols (including inositols) have been reported that are common for a number of species under investigation, for example, grapevine (Cramer et al., 2007), the halophyte Limonium latifolium (Gagneul et al., 2007), Arabidopsis (Gong et al., 2005; Sanchez et al., 2008a), Lotus japonicus (Sanchez et al., 2008b), and rice (Zuther et al., 2007). In addition, a clear reduction in a range of organic acids involved in and associated with the TCA cycle has been demonstrated in all these species. High Na+ stress often correlates with a strong decrease of K+. A recent study on the effects of K+ deficiency on the metabolism of leaves and roots of Arabidopsis has demonstrated an interesting pattern of strong increases of sugars and high nitrogen-containing amino acids in both roots and leaves whereas certain organic acids and other amino acids decrease only in roots (Armengaud et al., 2009). Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is an important cereal, grown primarily for animal feed and as a raw material for alcohol production. Barley production in Australia is affected by increasing dryland salinity which severely limits growth and reduces yields (Rengasamy et al., 2003). Barley is notable in that it can maintain growth whilst accumulating high concentrations of Na+ in its leaves (Munns et al., 1988). The high tissue tolerance of barley is likely to involve sequestration of Na+ into intracellular vacuoles and the synthesis of compatible solutes that accumulate in the cytoplasm to balance the osmotic potential of the vacuolar Na+. Thus, barley is a plant of particular interest for metabolomic studies and with the longer term aim of transferring the tissue tolerance trait to other commercial species such as wheat and rice which have much lower Na+ tissue tolerance. In the current study, a metabolomics analysis was conducted on the parents of a mapping population, Clipper and Sahara (the former is a commercial Australian cultivar and the latter a North African landrace) following salinity stress. The two cultivars were found to differ in their growth and metabolite responses to the imposed salinity stress. This differential response is discussed in terms of the potential involvement of particular metabolites in either a specific, adaptive response to salt stress, or to general cellular damage/ageing as a result of the stress treatment. Materials and methods Plant material and growth conditions Seeds of two cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. Clipper and cv. Sahara were obtained from Dr Tim Sutton from the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (ACPFG), University of Adelaide, Australia. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 70% ethanol for 1 min and then soaked in 10% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min. Seeds were washed thoroughly with water for 15 min, germinated in aerated water overnight, and then placed on moist filter paper for 2–3 d until the first leaf of the seedlings emerged. Individual seedlings were then suspended in a hydroponic nutrient solution composed of 2 mM Ca(NO3)2, 5 mM KNO3, 5 mM NH4NO3, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM KH2PO4, 0.5 mM Na2SiO3, 0.05 mM NaFe(III)EDTA, 5 μM MnCl2, 5 μM ZnSO4, 0.5 μM CuSO4, 0.1 μM NaMoO3, and 5 μM H3BO3. The solution was gently aerated and replaced every 3–4 d. Plants were grown in controlled conditions at 21/18 °C day/night, with a photoperiod regime of 16/8 h day/night at 200 μmol m−2 s−1 photon irradiance at plant height. NaCl treatment was started 7 d after germination. When salt stress was applied, the NaCl concentration was initially 50 mM and then increased the following day to the final concentration of 100 mM NaCl. CaCl2 was added to a final concentration of 3.3 mM to maintain levels of available Ca2+. Plants were grown for varying periods before being harvested for fresh and dry weight determinations. The second youngest leaf of five individual plants were separately harvested and immediately shock frozen in liquid nitrogen 4 h into the light regime and separately homogenized into a powder using a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen. Aliquots of the powder from the 3 week and 5 week (w) time points were used for elemental analysis and from the 24 h, 3 w, and 5 w for metabolomic analyses. Root tissue from each individual plant was harvested and immediately shock frozen in liquid nitrogen from 3-week-old and 5-week-old plants for metabolomic analysis. Growth measurements Shoot height, root length, and fresh and dry weights were recorded. For each measurement, four individual plants were used. Differences between control and NaCl-treated samples were tested by one-way and two-way ANOVAs (analysis of variance) using the statistical software package MINITAB (Minitab® Statistical Software, Minitab Inc., Pennsylvania, USA). Significance differences are compared using Tukey's pair-wise comparisons, with differences of P <0.05 being considered as significant.Elemental analysis in leaf tissue An aliquot of the frozen ground leaf (second youngest) samples was dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h, and sent to Dr Yuri Shavrukov (ACPFG, University of Adelaide) for elemental analysis as described in Jeffries et al. (1999). Extraction, derivatization and analysis of barley leaf and root metabolites Metabolite analysis by GC-MS was carried out as described by Roessner et al. (2006). Separate aliquots of the frozen and ground root and leaf tissue of five individual plants per cultivar and treatment were used for metabolite extraction. A polar metabolite fraction, obtained from approximately 60 mg homogenized leaf and 120 mg homogenized root tissue, was extracted in 350 μl of 100% methanol and 20 μl ribitol and norleucine (0.2 mg ml−1 ribitol and norleucine in water) added as internal standards for quantification. Samples were then processed, derivatized (both TMS and TBS), and analysed by GC-MS as described in Jacobs et al. (2007). Statistical analysis The data were analysed as described in Roessner et al. (2001) and are presented as fold changes compared with the reference, which is set to 1. Fold changes less than 1 were inverted and multiplied by −1 to aid interpretation. Differences between two treatments were considered significant when the P value (calculated using a Student's t test) was <0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out using Pirouette 3.11 software (Infometrix Inc, Woodinville, US) on the response data per gram FW for each individual metabolite and measurement following log10 transformation. Heatmap analysis combined with hierarchical cluster analysis of the same data set as used in the PCA analyses, but combined for roots and leaves, was carried out using the R program called made4 as described in Culhane et al. (2005). Results General growth performance of hydroponically grown Sahara and Clipper plants When grown hydroponically, Sahara and Clipper showed differential responses to salt. Sahara was less affected by the presence of 100 mM NaCl, there being an absence of leaf symptoms even after 5 w exposure (data not shown). Furthermore, an obvious reduction in biomass was seen in Clipper (Fig. 1
Roots are in direct contact with the growth solution and can be profoundly affected by salt stress. Roessner et al. (2006) have shown previously that Clipper roots are longer than Sahara roots. After 6 w of salt treatment, roots of both cultivars were reduced in length to a similar extent, i.e. a 46% reduction in Clipper and 43% in Sahara (Fig. 1C Sodium and potassium levels in the second youngest leaf Plant responses to 100 mM NaCl were determined by measuring Na+ concentrations in the second youngest leaf by flame photometry following exposure to salt for 3 w and 5 w. Table 1 shows that the concentration of Na+ in leaves was much higher in plants grown under salt stress, regardless of variety. In control plants, the K+/Na+ ratio varied between 390 and 1050, highlighting the high concentration of K+ relative to Na+. After salt treatment, there was a 30–40-fold increase in Na+ levels in Clipper, at both 3 w and 5 w, thus causing the K+/Na+ ratio to fall to 6 after 3 w and to recover slightly to 31 after 5 w. This increase in the K+/Na+ ratio was brought about by a 63% reduction in leaf Na+ between 3 w and 5 w and a 52% increase in leaf K+. There was a similar 30-fold increase in Na+ levels after 3 w in Sahara following exposure to elevated salt and a more modest 13-fold increase after 5 w. Despite this smaller increase after 5 w, the K+/Na+ ratio was almost identical to that of Clipper. For comparison, the K+/Na+ ratios in floral apices of barley cv. Clipper plants grown in gravel beds and watered with solutions containing 100 or 175 mol m−3 NaCl were 3 and 8, respectively (Munns et al., 1988). The floral apex K+/Na+ ratio in control plants was 28.
In an initial study, analysis of root Na+ and K+ at 6 h, 24 h, 1 w, and 2 w in both cultivars showed the same pattern as that in shoots, with no significant differences detected between cultivars in the presence or absence of salt (data not shown). Analyses of root Na+ and K+ at 3 w and 5 w were not subsequently performed. Metabolic responses in leaves after salt stress Clipper and Sahara showed no differences in their K+/Na+ ratios after 5 w of salt stress, despite obvious physiological differences in responses to salinity (Table 1). This suggested that the two cultivars may operate different cellular mechanisms in response to high levels of Na+ in their tissues. Here, a GC-MS-based strategy was used to investigate metabolite changes in the Clipper and Sahara cultivars following treatment with 100 mM NaCl for 24 h, 3 w, and 5 w. The objective was to compare metabolic responses between the cultivars and to monitor how short- and long-term salt imposition affects the metabolite profiles. Given that Na+ levels in leaves are important determinants in salinity tolerance, leaf metabolite changes were examined initially. A total of 72 compounds of known structure, comprising 23 amino acids, 20 organic acids and 29 sugars, were identified in leaf extracts of barley. A number of metabolites (30) were also found that could neither be identified nor classified using either commercial libraries such as NIST or the MSRI library (Kopka et al., 2004). Only those metabolites that could be chemically identified are described here and are summarized in Table 2 and in Supplementary Tables S1 to S4 at JXB online).
Figure 2
After 24 h in 100 mM NaCl, only a few metabolites changed their concentrations in Clipper and Sahara leaves (Table 2; see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online). In Sahara leaves, all significant changes were as a result of a decrease in metabolite concentration of between −1.2-fold and −10-fold. Metabolites at lower concentrations than the respective control plants were lysine, quinate, shikimate, succinate, threonate, threonate 1,4-lactone, 1-monohexadecanoglycerol, 1-monooctodecanoglycerol, fructose, galacturonate, glucose, maltose, sorbitol, and xylose (Table 2; see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online). The greatest decrease (−10-fold) was observed in sorbitol. In Clipper leaves, five metabolites increased and five others decreased in concentration (Table 2; see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online). Metabolites that increased 2–3-fold were valine and the sugars galactinol, gluconate, raffinose, and trehalose. Metabolites that decreased −2 to −14 fold were dehydroascorbate and the sugars fructose, galacturonate, glucose, and xylose. A greater number of changes in metabolite concentrations were noted in Clipper and Sahara leaves after 3 w of salt exposure (Table 2; see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online). Not only was the number of changes greater, but the magnitude of these changes was also generally larger. In Sahara leaves, the levels of several amino acids and their derivatives were −2 to −6-fold lower in salt-treated plants (Table 2; see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online). These were alanine, aspartate, glycine, putrescine, serine, and tyramine. All other changes were due to increases in metabolite concentration in salt-treated Sahara leaves. The levels of amino acids that were 2–12-fold higher were glutamate, homoserine, and threonine. Organic acids and sugars present at higher levels included intermediate metabolites of the hexose phosphate pool and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, polyols, sugars, and ascorbate. The hexose phosphate pool metabolites at 5–7-fold higher levels were 3-PGA, glucose-6-P, and fructose-6-P; the TCA cycle intermediates at 2–15-fold higher levels were α-ketoglutarate, aconitate, citrate, isocitrate, malate, and succinate; the polyols at 2–5-fold higher levels were inositol and glycerol-3-P; and the sugars at 2–6-fold higher levels were 2-ketogluconate, galactinol, galactonate, galacturonate, glucarate, maltose, raffinose, and sucrose. Ascorbate and dehydroascorbate levels were 2–5-fold higher in salt-treated Sahara leaves. The biggest changes, 14-fold increases, were in gluconate and isocitrate. A different set of metabolic responses was observed in Clipper leaves after 3 w of salt stress (Table 2; see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online). Only three metabolites were at lower concentrations as a result of the salt treatment: citrate, 1-mono-octodecanoglycerol, and trehalose. The fold reductions were all −3-fold or less. All other changes were increases. Amino acids at 2–65-fold higher concentrations were β-alanine, asparagine, aspartate, GABA, glutamte, glutamine, glycine, homoserine, proline, putrescine, serine, threonine, and valine. GABA, homoserine, and threonine all showed a greater than 10-fold increase in concentration, and glutamine and proline both showed a greater than 40-fold increase in concentration. The greatest increase at 94-fold was observed in N-acetylglutamate. Organic acids and sugars showing a 2–6-fold increase were monomethylphosphate, threonate-1,4-lactone, digalactosylglycerol, glucose, and xylose. Further differences in the metabolite profiles of Sahara and Clipper leaves were found following 5 w exposure to salt. No metabolites were present in lower amounts in Sahara leaves, but a few amino acids and sugars were present in higher amounts (Table 2; see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online). Of the amino acids and their derivatives, the levels of isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, putrescine, tyrosine, and valine were 5-fold higher or less, and levels of lysine and proline were 10-fold higher after salt stress. Sugars and sugar alcohols present at 2–6-fold higher levels were galactinol, raffinose, sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, 2-O-glycerol-β-D-galactose, digalactosyglycerol, glycerol, and glycerol-3-P. No significant fold changes were noted in levels of any organic acids. A greater range of changes (both higher and lower) was found in Clipper leaves after 5 w of salt stress. The majority of organic acids, polyols, and trehalose, and a few amino acids, were present in reduced amounts (see Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online). Organic acids at −2 to −12-fold levels than those in control plants were TCA cycle intermediates and the antioxidant ascorbate. Levels of polyols, such as inositol, and other sugar alcohols, such as 2-O-glycerol-β-D-galactose, 1-monohexadecanoglycerol, 1-mono-octodecanoglycerol, diethylglycerol, and sorbitol, were −1.5 to −5-fold lower. A few amino acids and derivatives were present at higher levels, including GABA (43-fold), leucine (4-fold), proline (45-fold), and putrescine (4-fold). The only amino acid present at lower levels after 5 w of salt stress was alanine (−5-fold). Metabolic responses in roots after salt stress In Clipper and Sahara roots, a total of 62 compounds were identified (see Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 at JXB online). The same compounds were present in both cultivars. Several metabolites were only identified in Clipper and Sahara leaves but not in roots: glutamine, tryptophan, α-ketoglutarate, ascorbate, galactonate, isocitrate, threonate-1,4-lactone, 1,6-anhydroglucose, glycerol, and melibiose. Levels of other metabolites that were detected but could not be identified will not be described here. Figure 3
Supplementary Table S3 at JXB online shows the range of metabolites identified in Sahara roots and how their levels changed after 24 h, 3 w, and 5 w of salt stress. After a short-term exposure to salt, levels of polyols and trehalose rose 2–3-fold (see Supplementary Table S3 at JXB online). Polyols at a higher concentration were glycerol-3-P and inositol. Levels of many more metabolites changed in Sahara roots after 3 w exposure to salt. In all cases, the respective metabolite was present at a lower concentration in salt-treated roots. Metabolites found to decrease −3 to −7-fold were homoserine, fumarate, glycerate, quinate, fructose, gluconate, glucose, and sorbitol. Levels of monomethylphosphate and threonate were found to decrease −16-fold and −9-fold, respectively. After 5 w of salt stress, only one metabolite, erythronate, was present at levels higher (6-fold) than those in control roots. In all other cases the metabolite was present at a level below that in the control (see Supplementary Table S3 at JXB online). Levels of two amino acids, lysine (−50-fold) and tyramine (−100-fold), were substantially lower. Decreases of −2 to −20-fold were also noted for many organic acids: dehydroascorbate, malate, maleate, quinate, monomethylphosphate, shikimate, succinate, and threonate. Levels of the sugar alcohol, inositol, were −2-fold lower. Larger reductions were noted in levels of the sugars fructose (−33-fold), glucose (−13-fold), and the sugar alcohol, diethylglycerol (−50-fold). Metabolic responses in Clipper roots after 24 h salt stress included decreases in the levels of most amino acids and three sugars; the levels of inositol and trehalose were 2-fold higher (see SupplementaryTable S4 at JXB online). Amino acids and their derivatives present at −2 to −10-fold lower levels were alanine, asparagine, homoserine, isoleucine, leucine, putrescine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and valine. The biggest reduction was in β-alanine, which was present at −14-fold lower levels. Levels of three sugars, fructose, glucose, and raffinose, fell by −4 to −7-fold. By 3 w of salt exposure, levels of β-alanine, alanine, GABA, glycine, proline, and putrescine were all above those of control plants. β-alanine (20-fold) and proline (117-fold) showed the biggest increases. Levels of several organic acids, erythronate, malate, ribonate, succinate, threonate, were all −2 to −5-fold lower in salt-exposed roots. Fructose-6-P (−6-fold), 2-ketogluconate (−3-fold), galacturonate (−3-fold), and glucarate (−3-fold) were sugars at lower levels, whereas sorbitol (18-fold) and trehalose (6-fold) were sugars at higher levels. Many organic acids were at lower levels in Clipper roots after 5 w of salt stress and included decreases of −4 to −50-fold in TCA cycle metabolites, such as citrate, fumarate, malate, and succinate. Sugars, such as 2-ketogluconate, fructose, glucose, and xylose, were −3 to −11-fold lower than in control plants. Levels of proline (8-fold), sorbitol (7-fold), and trehalose (9-fold) were higher after 5 w of salt stress, whereas levels of asparagine (−9-fold) and homoserine (−25-fold) were lower. A global perspective of metabolite changes in roots and leaves All data from roots and leaves of both cultivars are also summarized in the form of a heatmap in Fig. 4
Discussion Sahara grows better in high salt despite accumulating higher leaf Na+ levels When grown hydroponically under conditions of high salinity the two barley cultivars, Clipper and Sahara, performed very differently over the 6 w period. Clipper was severely affected, having a growth reduction of up to 58% of dry weight (compared with 14% in Sahara). In addition, Clipper leaves had developed extensive areas of necrosis by the end of the experimental period. Different responses were seen in Clipper and Sahara after 3 w of salt treatment: Clipper essentially ceased growing, whereas Sahara resumed growing at rates similar to those of untreated plants (Fig. 1 Only a few metabolites change after short-term (24 h) exposure to NaCl Following 24 h salt treatment only a small number of metabolites responded with more changes being observed in the roots of Clipper than in the roots of Sahara and the leaves of both plants. A number of amino acids and sugars (e.g. fructose, glucose, and raffinose) decreased in Clipper roots. Interestingly, in roots of both cultivars an increase in inositol and trehalose (see Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 at JXB online) was observed following 24 h salt treatment indicating a role of these two known osmoprotectants (Yancey, 2005) in the short-term osmotic response. While this has not previously been noted in barley, a recent study of Arabidopsis cell cultures following 24 h of salt stress also revealed an increase in the levels of inositol (Kim et al., 2007). Fricke et al. (2006) reported that solute levels in the elongation zone of the leaf of the barley cultivar Golf rose 8–20 h after the addition of 100 mM NaCl to the hydroponic solution. This assumption was supported by the change in external osmolarity caused by the addition of NaCl. Unfortunately, they did not analyse organic solutes in this experiment. It was proposed that the change in osmolarity was caused by the increase in inorganic solutes, such as K+ and nitrate (Fricke et al., 1994), however, organic solutes such as inositol and trehalose could also have contributed to the observed change. The fact that only a few metabolites responded after 24 h of treatment may suggest that a change of metabolite levels may not be possible within such a short time frame (Gibon et al., 2006). It would also have been interesting to determine whether transcript and protein levels as well as metabolic enzyme activities respond within 24 h of treatment. Increases in amino acids in Clipper leaves after salt stress may be related to tissue damage More than half of all amino acids analysed were statistically significantly increased in Clipper leaves after 3 w and 5 w of salt stress with some quite dramatic accumulations, for example, up to 94-fold in N-acetylglutamate levels (Table 2). In 3 w treated Sahara leaves a completely different response was observed with only a few amino acids being slightly increased and a similar number of them being slightly decreased (Table 2). After 5 w of treatment the amino acid profiles in Sahara showed more similarities to those of Clipper at 3 w suggesting that Sahara leaves are also beginning to sustain cell damage. Increased amino acid levels have previously been observed following different stress treatments (Kaplan et al., 2004; Nikiforova et al., 2006; Zuther et al., 2007; Sanchez et al., 2008a, b; Armengaud et al., 2009) and in some cases have been related to senescence and cell damage (Roessner et al., 2006; van Doorn and Woltering, 2008). Our data suggest that the onset of senescence may have been earlier in Clipper leaves since there were increased levels of amino acids as early as 3 w after salt treatment, whereas this pattern was only seen in Sahara at the 5 w time point. Increased levels of amino acids have been observed in rice cultivars (Zuther et al., 2007) and Lotus japonicus (Sanchez et al., 2008b) following salt treatment; both plants being considered to be salt sensitive. On the other hand, such increases in amino acid profiles were not observed in the halophyte Limonium latifolium (Plumbaginaceae; Gagneul et al., 2007), the salt-tolerant tree Populus euphratica (Brosche et al., 2005), nor the salt-cress Thellungiella halophila. In these plants only proline and a few other amino acids (e.g. aspartate) were increased. It is concluded, therefore, that with the exception of proline, most increases in amino acid levels in Clipper leaves after salt stress may not be part of an adaptive response to salt, but rather an indicator of general stress and cell damage. A similar scenario was evident in the root data with increased levels of amino acids in Clipper roots after 3 w of treatment (see Supplementary Table S3 at JXB online) whereas there were no changes in Sahara roots. It has already been shown, using a proteomics approach, that high salt treatment initiated programmed cell death (PCD) in rice root tips and this was correlated with reduced ATP production and an alteration in the activity of a number of metabolic enzymes (Tsunezuka et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2009). This again may indicate that increased levels of amino acids following a stress treatment may be correlated with senescence and cell damage or death. Levels of certain amino acid have also been observed to increase in Arabidopsis leaves and roots when grown under K+-deficient conditions (Armengaud et al., 2009) with stronger increases evident in the leaves. The authors proposed that the increased levels of amino acids may act to balance the loss of charge due to the strongly reduced K+ levels in those plants (Armengaud et al., 2009). In our study both Clipper and Sahara leaves showed reduced K+ levels to about half of the control levels following salt treatment. It is therefore important to consider if the Na+ toxicity symptoms observed in Clipper leaves also partly reflects a response to decreased K+ levels. Sahara as the more tolerant variety may be better adapted to cope with decreased K+ levels in its leaves. Further investigations are required to decipher the interdependence, if any, between the metabolic responses to Na+ toxicity and K+ deficiency and their role in salinity tolerance mechanisms. GABA and putrescine as potential senescence markers In concurrence with the hypothesis that increased amino acids are related to senescence and cell damage, it has been shown that glutamate and glutamine typically become more available during leaf senescence (Ansari et al., 2005). These molecules, both of which increased statistically in 3 w salt-treated Clipper leaves, can be converted to GABA (which also increased) by glutamate decarboxylase (GAD). GABA has been shown to be a stress marker (Bouche and Frommer, 2004) and an important molecule in changing nitrogen and carbohydrate metabolism (Fait et al., 2008). Another metabolite which has previously been shown to respond to drought and salt stress is putrescine, a member of the polyamine family (Alcazar et al., 2006; Groppa and Benavides, 2008); this was increased in Clipper leaves after 3 w and 5 w of salt stress treatment, whereas in Sahara leaves it only increased at 5 w. Polyamines are aliphatic nitrogen compounds which are positively charged at physiological pH allowing interaction with negatively charged macromolecules such as DNA, RNA, proteins or phospholipids. It has previously been shown that putrescine and spermidine levels, as well as the activities of polyamine biosynthetic enzymes, increased once rice leaves entered an advanced stage of senescence (Chien and Kao, 1991). Roessner et al. (2006) showed that boron-stressed tips of Clipper leaves, where necrosis was already visible, had strongly increased levels of putrescine (6-fold) compared with the leaf tips of untreated plants. By contrast, there were no changes in putrescine levels in the leaf tips of Sahara, the boron-stress-tolerant variety, following treatment with very high levels of boron (1000 μM) for 3 w (Sutton et al., 2007). A similar picture was observed for GABA with 7-fold increases in boron-treated Clipper leaf tips compared with untreated tips and no changes in Sahara. It is concluded that the increased putrescine and GABA levels observed here in salt-treated Clipper leaves and roots may also represent an indicator of the onset of senescence and cell damage in the leaf tissue. Are reduced levels of organic acids a marker of reduced growth following salt stress? There was a marked difference in the levels of organic acids in Clipper and Sahara leaves following salt-stress. In Sahara leaves after 3 w of salt stress, the levels of several metabolites from the tricarboxylic (TCA) cycle, including citrate (10-fold), aconitate (5-fold), isocitrate (15-fold), α-ketoglutarate (3-fold), succinate (2.5-fold), and malate (1.5-fold) all increased (Table 2). This possibly suggests an increase in the flow of carbon from glycolysis through this pathway leading to an increased production of NADH, FADH2, and ATP. Because the increased TCA cycle activity occurred at a time when growth of Sahara plants was resuming after the salt treatment (Fig. 2 An increase in the levels of ascorbate and its degradation products, dehydroascorbate and threonate, possibly also including threonate-1,4-lactone (Green and Fry, 2005) was found in 3 w treated Sahara leaves (Table 2). Ascorbate is a major antioxidant in plants protecting them, via the ascorbate–glutathione and xanthophyll cycles, against oxidative damage resulting from aerobic metabolism and photosynthesis (Smirnoff, 1996). Higher ascorbate levels may have supported the better performance of Sahara when grown under conditions of high salinity. It is also noteworthy that after 5 w of salt treatment none of the organic acids had increased (Table 2) suggesting that any increase in respiration and antioxidant activity was transient. Increased sugar levels in leaves are correlated with better growth performance of Sahara after salt stress A large number of sugar and sugar acid levels were significantly increased in 3 w treated Sahara leaves, whereas increases only in the levels of fructose and glucose were observed in 3 w treated Clipper leaves. Interestingly, these sugars did not change in Sahara leaves. It has been shown that accumulation of sugars is a common response to drought, salinity, and low-temperature stress (for reviews, see Gupta and Kaur, 2005; Wingler and Roitsch, 2008). Sugars act not only as osmoprotectants in helping to maintain osmotic balance and to stabilize macromolecules under stress conditions, but can also provide an immediate energy source to plants restarting growth after a period of stress-induced dormancy (Yancey, 2005). Increased levels of sugars following salt stress have also been described in Lotus japonicus (Sanchez et al., 2008b), Arabidopsis and Thellungiella with greater increases in sugars in the salt-acclimated Thellungiella (Gong et al., 2005), the halophyte species L. latifolium (Gagneul et al., 2007), and the salt-tolerant tree P. euphratica (Brosche et al., 2005). It is worth noting that no increases in sugars were observed in different rice cultivars following salt stress but rather there were decreases in fructose and sucrose levels (Zuther et al., 2007). There were also increases in the levels of certain metabolites involved in the biosynthesis of these sugars. For example, the trisaccharide raffinose (galactosyl-sucrose) is produced by the condensation of galactinol (α-galactosyl-myo-inositol) and sucrose to produce raffinose and inositol (Tapernoux-Lüthi et al., 2004). Levels of galactinol and inositol were both 2–3-fold higher in salt-treated Sahara leaves compared with controls. It has been proposed that inositol is an effective free radical scavenger (Smirnoff and Cumbes, 1989) since it has previously been shown to accumulate to high levels in salt-stressed plants (Ishitani et al., 1996; Gong et al., 2005; Gagneul et al., 2007; Brosche et al., 2005). Conclusions The data presented here provide a new perspective on the salt responses of two barley cultivars. When grown hydroponically, different responses to salt stress were observed in the two cultivars, possibly due to the large difference in the leaf K+/Na+ ratios. Sahara, the better-adapted cultivar, displayed tolerance to high internal salt concentrations without apparent cell damage suggesting that this cultivar may have mechanisms either to maintain a higher K+/Na+ ratio in the cytoplasm through compartmentation of Na+ into the vacuole or by increasing the metabolite levels to cope with the increased osmotic potential. Associated with the higher tissue tolerance in Sahara leaves was an increase in sugars, polyols, and a large number of organic acids which may either act as osmoprotectants or provide more readily available carbon sources for better growth performance compared with Clipper. By contrast, Clipper leaves, which showed symptoms of necrosis following salt stress, showed higher levels of amino acids which may be correlated with cell damage. A large decrease in organic acid levels in Clipper may reflect a reduced rate of metabolism as a response to salinity. Therefore, it is concluded that the metabolic differences in the responses of Clipper and Sahara following long-term salt exposure may be correlated with their differential abilities to sequester Na+ into the vacuole to avoid cellular damage. Supplementary data are available at JXB online. Supplementary Table S1. Metabolite ratios in 100 mM salt-treated Sahara leaves compared to controls for different lengths of time Supplementary Table S2. Metabolite ratios in 100 mM salt treated Clipper leaves compared to controls for different lengths of time Supplementary Table S3. Metabolite ratios in 100 mM salt treated Sahara roots compared to controls for different lengths of time Supplementary Table S4. Metabolite ratios in 100 mM salt-treated Clipper roots compared to controls for different lengths of time [Supplementary Data]
Acknowledgments This work was funded by grants to the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (ACPFG) from the Australian Research Council (ARC) and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), the South Australian Government, and the University of Adelaide, the University of Queensland, and the University of Melbourne. The authors would like to thank to Dr Tim Sutton for the barley seeds, and Megan Forbes and Suganthi Suren for assistance on GC-MS. Widodo was a recipient of the Melbourne International Fee Remission Scholarship (MIFRS) and Islamic Development Bank Merit Scholarship Program for High Technology (IDB-MSP). Abbreviations
References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant Physiol. 2005 Oct; 139(2):822-35.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]Funct Integr Genomics. 2009 Feb; 9(1):109-23.
[Funct Integr Genomics. 2009]Plant J. 2008 Mar; 53(6):973-87.
[Plant J. 2008]Phytochemistry. 2007 Feb; 68(4):426-37.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Planta. 2008 Jun; 228(1):167-77.
[Planta. 2008]J Exp Biol. 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 15):2819-30.
[J Exp Biol. 2005]Plant Cell. 1995 Jul; 7(7):1099-1111.
[Plant Cell. 1995]Ann Bot. 2009 Feb; 103(4):551-60.
[Ann Bot. 2009]Ann Bot. 2009 Feb; 103(4):561-79.
[Ann Bot. 2009]Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004 May; 6(3):269-79.
[Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(6):109.
[Genome Biol. 2004]Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-19.
[Physiol Plant. 2008]Funct Integr Genomics. 2007 Apr; 7(2):111-34.
[Funct Integr Genomics. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2007 Jul; 144(3):1598-611.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-19.
[Physiol Plant. 2008]Plant J. 2008 Mar; 53(6):973-87.
[Plant J. 2008]Plant Physiol. 2009 Jun; 150(2):772-85.
[Plant Physiol. 2009]Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov; 142(3):1087-101.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Plant Cell. 2001 Jan; 13(1):11-29.
[Plant Cell. 2001]Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun 1; 21(11):2789-90.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov; 142(3):1087-101.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(6):109.
[Genome Biol. 2004]Plant Cell. 2001 Jan; 13(1):11-29.
[Plant Cell. 2001]Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun 1; 21(11):2789-90.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Plant Physiol. 2006 Dec; 142(4):1537-47.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]J Exp Biol. 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 15):2819-30.
[J Exp Biol. 2005]J Exp Bot. 2007; 58(3):415-24.
[J Exp Bot. 2007]J Exp Bot. 2006; 57(5):1079-95.
[J Exp Bot. 2006]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(8):R76.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec; 136(4):4159-68.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Amino Acids. 2006 Mar; 30(2):173-83.
[Amino Acids. 2006]Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-19.
[Physiol Plant. 2008]Plant Physiol. 2009 Jun; 150(2):772-85.
[Plant Physiol. 2009]Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov; 142(3):1087-101.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005 Jan; 18(1):52-9.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005]Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009 May; 47(5):407-15.
[Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009]Plant Physiol. 2009 Jun; 150(2):772-85.
[Plant Physiol. 2009]Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jan; 13(1):14-9.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2008]Amino Acids. 2008 Jan; 34(1):35-45.
[Amino Acids. 2008]Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov; 142(3):1087-101.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Science. 2007 Nov 30; 318(5855):1446-9.
[Science. 2007]Nature. 2005 Jan 6; 433(7021):83-7.
[Nature. 2005]Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2008 Sep; 10 Suppl 1():50-62.
[Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2008]J Exp Biol. 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 15):2819-30.
[J Exp Biol. 2005]Plant J. 2008 Mar; 53(6):973-87.
[Plant J. 2008]Plant Physiol. 2007 Jul; 144(3):1598-611.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(12):R101.
[Genome Biol. 2005]Plant J. 1996 Apr; 9(4):537-48.
[Plant J. 1996]Plant Physiol. 2007 Jul; 144(3):1598-611.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(12):R101.
[Genome Biol. 2005]