![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Prostate cancer specific integrin αvβ3 modulates bone metastatic growth and tissue remodeling 1Department of Molecular Cardiology, Joseph J Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA 3Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA Correspondence: Dr TV Byzova, Department of Molecular Cardiology, Joseph J. Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. E mail: byzovat/at/ccf.org Abstract The management of pain and morbidity owing to the spreading and growth of cancer within bone remains to be a paramount problem in clinical care. Cancer cells actively transform bone, however, the molecular requirements and mechanisms of this process remain unclear. This study shows that functional modulation of the αvβ3 integrin receptor in prostate cancer cells is required for progression within bone and determines tumor-induced bone tissue transformation. Using histology and quantitative microCT analysis, we show that αvβ3 integrin is required not only for tumor growth within the bone but for tumor-induced bone gain, a response resembling bone lesions in prostate cancer patients. Expression of normal, fully functional αvβ3 enabled tumor growth in bone (incidence: 4/4), whereas αvβ3 (—), inactive or constitutively active mutants of αvβ3 did not (incidence: 0/4, 0/6 and 1/7, respectively) within a 35-day-period. This response appeared to be bone-specific in comparison to the subcutis where tumor incidence was greater than 60% for all groups. Interestingly, bone residing prostate cancer cells expressing normal or dis-regulated αvβ3 (either inactive of constitutively active), but not those lacking β3 promoted bone gain or afforded protection from bone loss in the presence or absence of histologically detectable tumor 35 days following implantation. As bone is replete with ligands for β3 integrin, we next demonstrated that αvβ3 integrin activation on tumor cells is essential for the recognition of key bone-specific matrix proteins. As a result, prostate cancer cells expressing fully functional but not dis-regulated αvβ3 integrin are able to control their own adherence and migration to bone matrix, functions that facilitate tumor growth and control bone lesion development. Keywords: prostate cancer, metastasis, bone, integrins The likelihood that patients with advanced prostate cancer will develop secondary lesions within the skeletal compartment is greater than 80% (Jacobs, 1983), thus indicating bone as a hospitable environment for the growth of disseminated disease. For successful engraftment within bone, prostate cancer cells must rely upon extracellular cues transmitted through growth factor receptors and cell adhesion molecules. Integrins are cell surface receptors that become activated through a tightly regulated process involving intracellular signal induced conformational changes (Ginsberg et al., 1992), which results in the rapid modulation of integrin ligand-binding affinity. Ligand binding then initiates internalization of extracellular signals, which modulate multiple cellular processes associated with the metastatic phenotype such as adhesion, migration and invasion. Therefore, by regulating the adhesiveness of prostate cancer cells during various phases of the metastatic process, integrins can govern the process of dissemination. Prostate cancer colonization of bone initiates the deposition of new bone leading to morbidities such as bone pain, compression of the spinal cord, pathologic fracture and paralysis (Saad et al., 2006). New bone deposition occurs as existing bone is destroyed (Keller and Brown, 2004) through osteoclast-mediated resorption, which requires functional integrin αvβ3 (Feng et al., 2001). In addition to its role in bone resorption, osteoclast αvβ3 appears to play a role in tumor colonization and growth within bone (Bakewell et al., 2003). Recent studies have shown that the expression of αvβ3 promotes spontaneous metastasis of breast cancer to bone (Takayama et al., 2005; Sloan et al., 2006) and the functional state of integrin αvβ3 is critical in many facets of this process. For example, constitutive activation of αvβ3 on breast cancer cells (Felding-Habermann et al., 2001) promotes hematogenous dissemination of breast cancer by facilitating tumor cell arrest via interaction with platelets (Felding-Habermann et al., 2001). Previous studies have focused on expression and functional status of tumor-specific αvβ3 in the hematogenous spread of cancers through observing bone homing potential. However, the role of tumor-specific αvβ3 in processes such as cancer progression within bone and tumor induced bone remodeling has been overlooked. This study was designed to establish the biological significance of the expression and functional state of prostate cancer-specific αvβ3 on tumor growth and tumor-induced remodeling of bone. The preparation of cells used in this study have been described previously (De et al., 2005). In short, we have generated LNCaP C4–2 prostate cancer cells that have lost β3 expression and used them to re-express (1) β3 WT, which can form heterodimers with αv to form αvβ3 in a relaxed, activatable state (αvβ3 WT cells); (2) mutant β3 D723R, which locks αvβ3 in the activated state (Hughes et al., 1996) thus bypassing inside-out signaling (αvβ3 constitutively active (CA) cells); or (3) mutant S752P, which locks αvβ3 in the relaxed state (Chen et al., 1992) resulting in non-active integrin (αvβ3 inactive cells). Flow cytometry indicated that expression levels of αvβ3 in cells re-expressing β3 integrin, whether WT, CA or inactive, were similar; however, fibrinogen binding was threefold higher for αvβ3 CA cells compared to αvβ3 WT cells (Supplementary Table 1). We have previously shown the activating nature of the β3 D723R mutation by illustrating clustering characteristics of αvβ3 CA in unstimulated C4–2 cells in suspension (De et al., 2005). We further confirmed the nature of this mutation by demonstrating constitutive phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase following ligand binding (Supplementary Figure 1), an effect previously noted to be the result of constitutive integrin activation (Li et al., 2005). Thus, functional differences in αvβ3 between WT, CA and inactive cells are critical in this model, not expression changes among these groups. Microcomputed tomography (microCT) was used to monitor tumor-induced changes in bone structural indices over time. To obtain baseline bone structural indices, microCT analysis was performed 1-day post-intratibial implantation of prostate cancer cells. Contralateral tibiae were injected with vehicle to account for surgically induced remodeling. We found a wide range among multiple bone structural indices across the sample population of mice (n=19) upon initial scanning of the volume of interest. For example, the trabecular thickness in μm (range=45.25–76.69, mean=60.17±7.05 (s.d.)), trabecular spacing in μm (range=46.95–130.96, mean=86.85±20.55 (s.d.)), trabecular number per mm (range=9.64–16.97, mean=12.45±1.90 (s.d.)), and trabecular bone surface area in mm2 (range=3.04–8.59, mean=6.02±1.34 (s.d.)) within individual tibiae varied drastically; however, no significant difference between the tibiae (right vs left) of individual animals was found. To account for these inherent differences in bone structural indices, we expressed our data as percent differences in vehicle and tumor injected tibiae over time. Representative three-dimensional microCT images of tumor injected tibia from each group are shown in Figure 1
Tibiae were also examined histologically to determine tumor incidence (Figure 3
The abundance of αvβ3 ligands in bone may explain the attraction of both prostate and breast carcinomas to this tissue. We found that the activation status of αvβ3 plays a role in the adhesion and migration to individual bone matrix proteins and total bone extracts. Cells expressing constitutively active αvβ3 promoted robust cellular adhesion to vitronectin, a reference ligand for αvβ3 and major extracellular component of mature bone (Supplementary Table 2), whereas αvβ3 WT cells required stimulation to achieve the same effect. In addition, migration to vitronectin was dependent upon the activation state of αvβ3. In accordance with a previous study (Byzova et al., 2000), migration to bone sialoprotein (BSP) occurred in a concentration-dependent manner for αvβ3 WT and CA cells, whereas migration of αvβ3 (—) and αvβ3-inactive cells was negligible (Supplementary Table 2). In the presence of blocking antibody to αvβ3 (LM609), all cell types displayed similar levels of migration, indicating that αvβ3 is the specific integrin responsible for the observed migration. Migration of tumor cells to secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) mirrored that of cells to BSP with SPARC promoting migration of αvβ3 WT and CA cells but not αvβ3 (—) cells. Pretreatment of αvβ3 WT and CA cells with LM609 resulted in decreased migration by approximately 70% indicating specificity. Little effect was noted in αvβ3 (—) and αvβ3-inactive cells. To ensure that our results were not owing to the use of isolated bone-derived proteins and thus do not reflect the milieu of bone constituents that prostate cancer cells would encounter upon entrance to the skeletal compartment, we confirmed our adhesion and migration results using total bone extract. Results from adhesion and migration experiments utilizing total bone extract mirrored and support those where isolated bone-derived proteins were used. It is possible that αvβ3-inactive cells, which fail to transmit survival signals as a result of inefficient ligand binding (Chen et al., 1992) and express low levels of growth factors such as VEGF as a result of reduced αvβ3 ligand affinity (De et al., 2005), leads to a diminished capacity for long-term survival in bone (Kitagawa et al., 2005). Conversely, αvβ3 WT cells, which readily colonize bone, efficiently bind and migrate to ligand following αvβ3 activation. Interestingly, our adhesion and migration data indicated that αvβ3 CA cells should thrive within bone; however, αvβ3 CA cells exhibited a severely diminished capacity for sustained in vivo bone colonization. Our previous studies indicated that bone metastatic prostate cancer, in comparison to normal matched prostate tissue, expressed dramatically elevated levels of activated αvβ3 (De et al., 2003). This activation, however, was due to a feedback mechanism wherein VEGF signaling initiates inside-out αvβ3 activation leading to enhanced ligand-binding affinity. A constitutively active mutant of αvβ3 would bypass the need for activation and could not dynamically regulate cell adhesion, a condition, which may be deleterious for long term in vivo persistence in bone (Schwartz and Ginsberg, 2002). It is possible that constitutively active αvβ3, in the context of abundant matrix bound ligands such as that in bone, may lead to excessive, unregulated outside-in signaling that could be detrimental to tumor growth. Thus, expression of inactive αvβ3 by prostate cancer cells may inhibit sustained bone colonization and proliferation in bone tissue, whereas expression of constitutively active αvβ3 by prostate cancer cells may promote metastasis and initial engraftment within bone but inhibit subsequent growth. Together, our data suggest that, in addition to elevated expression/usage of αvβ3 by bone metastatic prostate cancer cells (Stewart et al., 2004), the ability to regulate the recognition of extracellular matrix through physiological αvβ3 activation, a function lacking in both αvβ3 CA and αvβ3-inactive tumor cells, increases the potential for the development of skeletal metastases and contributes to the osteoblastic phenotype of bone lesions. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the activation status of integrin αvβ3 on prostate cancer cells influences recognition of individual bone matrix proteins, a key early step in the establishment of bone metastatic disease. Hence, integrin αvβ3 supports the development of bone metastases by at least three different mechanisms: (1) tumor-specific αvβ3 expression and functional state control prostate cancer engraftment of bone, survival following colonization, and tumor induce tissue remodeling (present study); (2) osteoclast αvβ3 activity controls bone resorption (Feng et al., 2001), a necessary event for the expansion of bone residing tumor and (3) osteoclast αvβ3 enables the metastatic colonization and growth of tumor in bone (Bakewell et al., 2003). Considering these data, it is possible that antagonism of αvβ3, thus inhibiting bone colonization (by acting upon prostate cancer cells and osteoclasts) and limiting proliferation of bone residing prostate cancer cells (Nemeth et al., 2003), coupled with one or more existing therapies could prove to be an effective, multifaceted treatment modality for patients with advanced disease. Supplement Click here to view.(387K, pdf) Acknowledgements We thank Dr Sara Seidelmann for critical review of this manuscript. This work was supported by the following grants: DK060933 to TV Byzova. NP McCabe is the recipient of a Ruth L Kirschstein Research Service Award (NRSA) Individual Fellowship (CA1172462); Cleveland Clinic Musculoskeletal Core Center funded in part by NIAMS Core Center Grant 1P30 AR-050953. Footnotes Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Oncogene website (http://www.nature.com/onc). References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Urology. 1983 Apr; 21(4):337-44.
[Urology. 1983]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Oct; 4(5):766-71.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992]Eur Urol. 2006 Mar; 49(3):429-40.
[Eur Urol. 2006]J Cell Biochem. 2004 Mar 1; 91(4):718-29.
[J Cell Biochem. 2004]J Clin Invest. 2001 May; 107(9):1137-44.
[J Clin Invest. 2001]Anticancer Res. 2005 Jan-Feb; 25(1A):79-83.
[Anticancer Res. 2005]Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(2):R20.
[Breast Cancer Res. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 13; 98(4):1853-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 24; 102(21):7589-94.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 22; 271(12):6571-4.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1; 89(21):10169-73.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 1; 102(5):1424-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1; 89(21):10169-73.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]FASEB J. 2002 Aug; 16(10):1266-8.
[FASEB J. 2002]Cancer Res. 2004 Apr 15; 64(8):2751-8.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Blood. 2001 Oct 15; 98(8):2432-41.
[Blood. 2001]Exp Cell Res. 2000 Feb 1; 254(2):299-308.
[Exp Cell Res. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1; 89(21):10169-73.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 24; 102(21):7589-94.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 1; 65(23):10921-9.
[Cancer Res. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 3; 278(40):39044-50.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Apr; 4(4):E65-8.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2002]Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004 Jan 7; 2():2.
[Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004]J Clin Invest. 2001 May; 107(9):1137-44.
[J Clin Invest. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25; 100(24):14205-10.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Clin Exp Metastasis. 2003; 20(5):413-20.
[Clin Exp Metastasis. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 3; 278(40):39044-50.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]