• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Curr Opin Genet Dev. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2752143
NIHMSID: NIHMS132406

Early zebrafish development: It’s in the maternal genes

Summary

The earliest stages of embryonic development in all animals examined rely on maternal gene products that are generated during oogenesis and supplied to the egg. The period of maternal control of embryonic development varies among animals according to the onset of zygotic transcription and the persistence of maternal gene products. This maternal regulation has been little studied in vertebrates, due to the difficulty in manipulating maternal gene function and lack of basic molecular information. However, recent maternal-effect screens in the zebrafish have generated more than 40 unique mutants that are providing new molecular entry points to the maternal control of early vertebrate development. Here we discuss recent studies of 12 zebrafish mutant genes that illuminate the maternal molecular controls on embryonic development, including advances in the regulation of animal-vegetal polarity, egg activation, cleavage development, body plan formation, tissue morphogenesis, microRNA function and germ cell development.

Introduction

The zebrafish has emerged as a premiere genetic tool for studying vertebrate development. In the 1990’s forward genetic screens identified numerous zygotic mutants defective in key molecules important in early embryonic development[17]. Recently, a major focus has shifted towards more specialized screens, including the identification of maternal-effect mutations in adult screens in the zebrafish. Since the earliest stages of development are driven primarily by maternal gene products, the identification of corresponding mutants is critical to provide genetic entry points to known maternally-controlled processes, which are still poorly understood in vertebrates.

Maternal-effect screens have identified over 40 mutants affecting many early developmental processes (Figure 1). Collectively, these mutants have defects in oocyte development[8], egg activation[8,9], embryonic cleavage[811], patterning and morphogenesis[911]. New studies have focused on the molecular identification of the corresponding mutant genes, a key step to understanding the molecular mechanisms governing the very earliest stages of embryogenesis. The results have unveiled novel and known genes with unanticipated roles in early development. Mutants generated by reverse genetic TILLING methods in the zebrafish have also recently revealed important roles for small noncoding RNA molecules, miRNAs[12] and piRNAs[13,14], in the regulation of maternal processes in zebrafish development.

Figure 1
Maternal-effect mutant genes in zebrafish disrupt development at distinct Stages

In this review, we highlight recent contributions to the molecular regulation of animal-vegetal polarity in the oocyte and egg, maternal gene regulation of early embryonic patterning, tissue morphogenesis, and small noncoding RNA molecules, which are emerging as important players in germ line development.

Molecular insights into zebrafish animal-vegetal polarity

In frogs and fish, the first developmental asymmetry of the embryo is the animal-vegetal axis, which predicts the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo. This asymmetry is established during early stages of oogenesis and is first marked by formation of the Balbiani body (Bb; also referred to as the mitochondrial cloud) adjacent to the germinal vesicle (the oocyte nucleus) in stage I oocytes. The Bb position predicts the location of the vegetal pole, but its presence is only transient, as it disassembles by stage II of oogenesis. The Bb is composed of a collection of mitochondria, ER, germinal granules, and several germ plasm mRNAs (reviewed in[15]). Recently, a thorough study recapitulated in zebrafish transgenic constructs the localization pattern of three Bb-localized transcripts. The 3’ UTRs of nanos, vasa, and dazl directed their localization initially to the Bb and then to the vegetal cortex of the oocyte[16], likely via the METRO pathway described in Xenopus[17]. The ensuing distribution at the vegetal cortex differs among these transcripts: dazl persists at the vegetal cortex, vasa extends around the cortex, and nanos becomes unlocalized (Figure 2), suggesting, unexpectedly, that coordinate localization of germ plasm components is followed by their redistribution to distinct locations. However, after fertilization of the egg, these germ plasm RNAs reunite in the blastodisc at the animal pole, where they localize to the germ plasm at the cleavage furrows of the 4-cell stage embryo[16,1821].

Figure 2
mRNA localization during oocyte development

Three regions within the dazl 3’UTR are critical for, 1) localization to the Bb, 2) anchoring to the vegetal cortex, and 3) localization to the cleavage furrows in the early embryo[16]. Interestingly, although the 3’UTR of the nanos-related gene Xcat2 in Xenopus, also localizes it to the Bb and vegetal cortex in zebrafish, little sequence similarity is evident in the 3’UTRs of Xcat2, and zebrafish nanos, dazl, and vasa[16], suggesting either small motifs, or secondary/tertiary structure of the UTRs are conserved. Thus, germ plasm mRNA localization occurs in a stepwise, spatiotemporal fashion, with conserved features to the transport systems in Xenopus[16].

Recent studies have provided genetic access into the mechanisms of Bb formation and germ plasm assembly in the oocyte. The maternal-effect mutant bucky ball (buc), identified through its animal-vegetal polarity egg phenotype[8], is defective in Bb formation and early oocyte polarity, as animal pole markers are expanded radially and vegetal pole markers are unlocalized[22,23]. Buc is required for early vegetal pole mRNA localization that occurs via the Bb, as well as late vegetal pole localization that occurs after Bb dissociation, which is postulated to depend on the early pathway[24,25]. Thus, the failure of late vegetal pole mRNA localization in buc mutant oocytes may be secondary to the lack of Bb formation. Buc functions to promote vegetal and exclude animal pole identity also in the surrounding follicle cell layer, preventing the formation of multiple micropylar cells, an animal pole-specific follicle cell fate. Thus, patterning of the oocyte and surrounding somatic follicle cell layer appears to be coordinated through an as yet unknown signaling mechanism [22].

Recently the molecular identity of buc was determined to be a novel 639 amino acid protein[23], first identified as XVelo1 in Xenopus[26]. The predicted Buc protein contains no known functional motifs. The localization of buc mRNA is dynamic during oocyte development, initially localizing to the Bb, moving vegetally, and then ultimately localizing to the animal pole during late oogenesis[23] (Figure 2). A Buc-GFP fusion also localizes to the Bb and, interestingly, to the germ plasm of the embryo and can induce ectopic germ cells in the embryo[23]. Buc homologues in other vertebrates have low predicted amino acid conservation, indicating that it has evolved at a relatively accelerated rate. Interestingly, the human version lacks a complete open reading frame, suggesting that it has lost its function all together in humans or functions as an RNA. In zebrafish Buc clearly functions as a protein, since a nonsense mutation truncating it by just 30 amino acids causes a failure in Bb formation [23]. However, the buc RNA could have additional functions in Bb formation and animal-vegetal polarity, similar to oskar in Drosophila[27], also a germ plasm component. Future structure-function experiments of the buc RNA/protein, together with the isolation of interacting partners will unravel mechanistically how this novel gene functions.

Egg activation molecular genetics

In zebrafish egg activation is marked by cortical granule exocytosis (CGE), chorion elevation and the segregation of cytoplasm from the yolk to the animal pole to form the single cell blastodisc. Embryos derived from brom bones (brb) mutant females are defective in this process [28]. The egg activation defect is a result of failure of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) signaling, which induces a Ca2+ wave critical for normal egg activation in all animals examined. The reinstatement of either IP3 or Ca2+ in brb mutant eggs can rescue the egg activation defect[28]. brb was shown to encode heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein I (hnRNP I), likely regulating during oogenesis the production of an egg activation signaling component. hnRNP I has been previous shown to be important in a variety of developmental processes including translational control in oogenesis[29], spermatogenesis[30] and RNA localization[3134]. Thus, brb mutants reveal yet another developmental function for hnRNP I, i.e. a role in egg activation.

Cleavage stage molecular genetics

Maternal-effect screens have yielded a significant number of mutations affecting cleavage development[811], although most of the mutant genes have yet to be cloned. cellular atoll (cea) mutants fail to undergo cleavages at the second cell division and beyond[8,35], and was recently shown to encode the centriolar component sas-6[35]. Interestingly, as sperm normally provide the centriole to the zygote, cea also has a paternal-effect function, whereby wild-type eggs fertilized with cea mutant sperm result in inviable tetraploid embryos. Since the cleavage stage of development is primarily under maternal control, the eventual molecular identification of other maternal-effect mutant genes functioning during this period will enhance our understanding of this important stage of development.

The maternal-effect cellular island (cei) mutant displays an early defect in cleavage furrow formation [8]. cei encodes a hypomorphic allele of Aurora B Kinase[36], a protein previously shown to be important in several aspects of cell division in other systems (reviewed in[37]). Aurora B Kinase function is vital zygotically later in zebrafish embryogenesis, as a null retroviral insertional allele reveals furrow defects during this period[36,38]. Interestingly, the maternal-effect cei allele causes a specific defect in distal furrow formation during the early cleavage stage, while medially positioned furrows can form, likely due to intact mitotic spindle-derived signals mediating medial furrow formation[36]. The ability of the cei mutant Aurora B Kinase protein to mediate all its cytokinesis functions zygotically, but its inability to mediate distal furrow formation in the cleavage embryo may be related to unique requirements for astral microtubules and Aurora B Kinase to divide the large cells of the very early embryo[36].

Molecular genetic advances in maternal regulated patterning and morphogenesis

In fish and amphibians, the dorsoventral embryonic axis is established through a maternally-regulated Wnt/βcatenin pathway. Several zebrafish maternal-effect mutants with defects in dorsoventral axis formation have been identified. The maternal-effect ventralized mutants hecate and tokkaebe produce embryos lacking a dorsal organizer and consequently are radially ventralized. Although hecate and tokkaebe have not yet been molecular defined, injection/rescue experiments with Wnt signaling pathway components indicates that they act upstream of, or within a Wnt/βcatenin signaling pathway, respectively, to induce the dorsal organizer[3941]. tokkaebe likely corresponds to a novel component of the Wnt pathway, since no known Wnt components are found within the 0.5 cM interval containing the tokkaebe mutation[41].

The maternal-effect ventralized mutant ichabod is caused by a specific loss of maternal βcatenin2 function[42]. Two βcatenin genes have been identified in the zebrafish genome; however, only βcatenin2 is essential maternally to induce the dorsal organizer through a Wnt signaling pathway. Interestingly, the maternal, dorsal organizer Wnt/βcatenin2 pathway also functions to repress expression of a later Wnt8/βcatenin pathway that opposes dorsal specification ventrally[42] (Figure 3). In zebrafish this late blastula Wnt pathway depends on both βcatenin1 and βcatenin2 function and is mediated by zygotic Wnt8 signaling ventrally[4245]. Thus in the absence of both βcatenin1 and βcatenin2 function, early dorsal organizer formation fails; however, at later stages the ventral Wnt8 pathway also fails to oppose dorsal fate specification ventrally. The result is formation of dorsal tissues circumferentially. These results show, surprisingly, that at a late blastula stage circumferential organizer-like tissue can form in the absence of a maternal Wnt/βcatenin pathway and independently of Wnt/βcatenin signaling entirely.

Figure 3
The role of BMP and early and late Wnt signaling in dorsoventral patterning

The transcription factor pou2/oct4 also acts maternally in dorsoventral patterning and morphogenesis[46,47], revealing additional roles to its described maternal function in endoderm specification[48,49]. Loss of both maternal and zygotic (MZ) Pou2 causes severe dorsalization due to failure to induce bmp ligand gene expression, which functions in ventrolateral tissue specification[46]. These results demonstrate that ventral specification via the BMP signaling pathway is not a default pathway, as previously thought, but instead is initiated by maternal Pou2/Oct4 in the early embryo[46] (Figure 3). MZPou2 also regulates the morphogenic process of epiboly, the thinning and spreading of the blastoderm over the yolk cell, through functions in yolk cell microtubule formation, cell adhesive properties, and blastoderm cell movements via a cell non-autonomous mechanism [46,47]. Together, these studies reveal that the renowned pou2/oct4 stem cell gene in mammals is a key maternal regulator of early zebrafish development

The betty boop (bbp) mutant, identified in a maternal-effect screen, is a strictly maternally-acting gene regulating the morphogenic process of epiboly[10,50]. Embryos from bbp mothers develop normally until they reach 50% epiboly at which point the embryo abruptly bursts via a presumptive premature constriction of the actin cytoskeleton in the yolk cell[50]. Interestingly, bbp was recently shown to encode the zebrafish homolog of Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Activated Protein Kinase 2 (MAPKAPK2), a target of p38 MAP kinase (MAPK) in cell culture systems[51]. During zebrafish epiboly, p38 MAPK also appears to activate MAPKAPK2, as a dominant-negative p38 MAPK causes the same epiboly defect as loss of bbp[50]. Neither p38 MAPK, nor MAPKAPK2 have been previously implicated in tissue morphogenesis. Thus, the identification and cloning of the bbp gene is a model genetic case for an unexpected pathway being placed in a developmental process, in this case epiboly, which may not have been considered in a candidate-gene reverse genetic approach.

Small RNA molecules in early development

Small noncoding RNAs are emerging as important players in early zebrafish development. Maternal-zygotic (MZ) mutant embryos of the microRNA (miRNA)-processing enzyme Dicer exhibit early embryonic defects in gastrulation, somitogenesis, brain morphogenesis, and heart development [52]. By removing the strong maternal component of dicer, MZ-dicer mutant embryos are completely devoid of miRNA processing and therefore, devoid of all miRNA function. miRNAs negatively regulate target genes by binding to their 3’UTR, promoting deadenylation, translational repression and/or ultimately degradation of the transcript (reviewed in [53]). In zebrafish, the predominantly expressed miRNA during early embryogenesis is miR-430, which is first expressed at the mid-blastula transition (MBT), and is not expressed maternally[54]. A central finding revealed by the loss of miR-430 through MZ-dicer is its role in the clearance of maternal mRNAs at the MBT. In MZ-dicer mutant embryos, maternal mRNAs abnormally persist beyond the MBT[12]. To date, no maternal miRNAs have been reported in the zebrafish embryo[54]. Thus, it is unclear whether the maternal role of dicer is to primarily process miR-430 at the MBT or in addition, also process unidentified maternal miRNA(s).

Inhibition of miRNA function plays a role in germ line development. nanos1 is expressed early in germ line development and a mutant, generated through TILLING methods, demonstrates its maternal requirement for PGC survival and a function in the adult in maintaining oocyte production [55]. nanos1 is resistant to miRNA repression in the germ line, but not in the soma, promoting its specific expression in the germ line[56]. This resistance is conferred, at least in part, by the maternally-expressed germ cell-localized RNA binding protein Dead End (Dnd), which interacts with the nanos1 3’UTR, presumably blocking the binding of miR-430[57]. Interestingly, this resistance to miRNA repression is also found in another germ plasm mRNA, Tudor-domain-containing-7 (Tdrd-7)[56], suggesting a general mechanism involving Dnd in influencing germ cell-specific gene expression (Figure 4).

Figure 4
miRNA regulation of germ line development

Germ plasm mRNA resistance to miRNA regulation is not universal, however, as the dnd 3’ UTR itself lacks a miR-430 site and therefore is presumably not repressed in the soma by miRNAs[58]. Since dnd maternal transcripts are dramatically eliminated in the soma about one hour after the MBT[59], independently of miR-430 regulation, it suggests the existence of additional mode(s) of modulating maternal transcripts at this critical developmental transition. Likewise, vasa removal from the soma is also independent of miR-430 regulation[56]. Thus, an unknown, possibly common additional mechanism eliminates dnd and vasa transcripts from the soma.

A Dicer-independent class of small noncoding RNAs, known as piRNAs or Piwi associated RNAs, appear to be germ line specific[13,14,60,61]. Piwi proteins are important for target gene silencing[62]. Presumptive null, zygotic mutations in either of two piwi homologues in zebrafish, ziwi and zili, cause the progressive loss of germ cells between 3–7 weeks of age[13,14]. Mutant adults are phenotypically male, consistent with recent studies demonstrating that zebrafish develop phenotypically as male when eliminating the germ line[13,63,64]. Interestingly, there is a maternal-effect meiotic progression defect in zili hypomorphic mutants. Although mutant eggs can be fertilized, they fail to undergo meiosis I and II[13]. Piwi proteins in the mouse function to repress transposon activity in the germ line[65,66]. The meiotic defects in zili hypomorphs mutants, however, are not linked to increased transposon activity as measured by quantitative RT-PCR and in situ hybridization[13]. These findings reveal a novel function for piRNAs, whose function in vertebrates was previously thought confined to regulating transposon activity in the germ line[13].

Future outlook

A major hindrance to the molecular cloning of chemically-induced mutant genes in zebrafish is the incomplete assembly of the genomic sequence. This obstacle is becoming less of an issue with recent improvements to the assembly (currently Zv8; www.sanger.ac.uk). As existing gaps are eliminated and the genome sequence is completed, the molecular cloning of maternal-effect mutant genes will be greatly accelerated.

The investigation of the maternal functions of essential zygotic genes will be more difficult to study. Although germ line chimeric analysis is a successful method to examine the maternal function of zygotic lethal genes in zebrafish[67], it is quite labor intensive and would be impractical for large throughput analysis of such maternal function. This problem may be overcome by employing techniques that utilize mitotic recombination, a principle heavily relied upon in Drosophila genetics[68]. RecQ helicases are known to prevent recombination during replication[69]. Induced mitotic recombination through the suppression of RecQ helicases was recently demonstrated in zebrafish[70]. This approach can generate mutant clones from heterozygous cells at a significant frequency (~1.7– 3.4% )[70]. With further improvements in this technology, mitotic recombination could potentially be used to generate homozygous mutant germ line clones of zygotic lethal mutations from heterozygous individuals. Such germ line mosaic females would generate maternally-deficient eggs and embryos, allowing the study of the maternal gene function.

Reverse genetic techniques are very valuable complements to forward genetic approaches in the zebrafish. Antisense morpholino oligos are widely used to block translation or disrupt splicing[71,72]. However, the function of maternal protein already present in the egg cannot be blocked by morpholino injection into the egg, although advances in oocyte cell culture methods may make it possible to use this method in the future to examine maternal gene functions. Reverse genetic approaches that rely on induction of genomic sequence alterations are considerably more laborious, but generate robust loss-of-function reagents. Recently, the TILLING (Target Induced Local Lesions in Genomes) approach[13,14,55], as well as the zinc finger nuclease approach designed to mutate a specific sequence of the genome[7375], have been very successful in generating mutants in zebrafish. Hence, TILLING and zinc finger nuclease strategies look very promising for eliminating gene function of suspected maternal-effect genes in zebrafish in the future.

Acknowledgements

We thank Lee Kapp for comments on the manuscript, and Eric Weinberg and Mate Varga for helpful discussion. Funding was provided by NIH grant HD050901 to MCM.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Driever W, Solnica-Krezel L, Schier AF, Neuhauss SC, Malicki J, Stemple DL, Stainier DY, Zwartkruis F, Abdelilah S, Rangini Z, et al. A genetic screen for mutations affecting embryogenesis in zebrafish. Development. 1996;123:37–46. [PubMed]
2. Hammerschmidt M, Pelegri F, Mullins MC, Kane DA, Brand M, van Eeden FJ, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Heisenberg CP, et al. Mutations affecting morphogenesis during gastrulation and tail formation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development. 1996;123:143–151. [PubMed]
3. Kane DA, Hammerschmidt M, Mullins MC, Maischein HM, Brand M, van Eeden FJ, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Heisenberg CP, et al. The zebrafish epiboly mutants. Development. 1996;123:47–55. [PubMed]
4. Kane DA, Maischein HM, Brand M, van Eeden FJ, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Hammerschmidt M, Heisenberg CP, Jiang YJ, et al. The zebrafish early arrest mutants. Development. 1996;123:57–66. [PubMed]
5. Mullins MC, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, Odenthal J, Brand M, van Eeden FJ, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Heisenberg CP, et al. Genes establishing dorsoventral pattern formation in the zebrafish embryo: the ventral specifying genes. Development. 1996;123:81–93. [PubMed]
6. Solnica-Krezel L, Stemple DL, Mountcastle-Shah E, Rangini Z, Neuhauss SC, Malicki J, Schier AF, Stainier DY, Zwartkruis F, Abdelilah S, et al. Mutations affecting cell fates and cellular rearrangements during gastrulation in zebrafish. Development. 1996;123:67–80. [PubMed]
7. Stemple DL, Solnica-Krezel L, Zwartkruis F, Neuhauss SC, Schier AF, Malicki J, Stainier DY, Abdelilah S, Rangini Z, Mountcastle-Shah E, et al. Mutations affecting development of the notochord in zebrafish. Development. 1996;123:117–128. [PubMed]
8. Dosch R, Wagner DS, Mintzer KA, Runke G, Wiemelt AP, Mullins MC. Maternal control of vertebrate development before the midblastula transition: mutants from the zebrafish I. Dev Cell. 2004;6:771–780. [PubMed]
9. Pelegri F, Dekens MP, Schulte-Merker S, Maischein HM, Weiler C, Nusslein-Volhard C. Identification of recessive maternal-effect mutations in the zebrafish using a gynogenesis-based method. Dev Dyn. 2004;231:324–335. [PubMed]
10. Wagner DS, Dosch R, Mintzer KA, Wiemelt AP, Mullins MC. Maternal control of development at the midblastula transition and beyond: mutants from the zebrafish II. Dev Cell. 2004;6:781–790. [PubMed]
11. Kishimoto Y, Koshida S, Furutani-Seiki M, Kondoh H. Zebrafish maternal-effect mutations causing cytokinesis defect without affecting mitosis or equatorial vasa deposition. Mech Dev. 2004;121:79–89. [PubMed]
12. Giraldez AJ, Mishima Y, Rihel J, Grocock RJ, Van Dongen S, Inoue K, Enright AJ, Schier AF. Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science. 2006;312:75–79. [PubMed]
13. Houwing S, Berezikov E, Ketting RF. Zili is required for germ cell differentiation and meiosis in zebrafish. Embo J. 2008;27:2702–2711. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Houwing S, Kamminga LM, Berezikov E, Cronembold D, Girard A, van den Elst H, Filippov DV, Blaser H, Raz E, Moens CB, et al. A role for Piwi and piRNAs in germ cell maintenance and transposon silencing in Zebrafish. Cell. 2007;129:69–82. [PubMed]
15. Kloc M, Bilinski S, Etkin LD. The Balbiani body and germ cell determinants: 150 years later. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2004;59:1–36. [PubMed]
16. Kosaka K, Kawakami K, Sakamoto H, Inoue K. Spatiotemporal localization of germ plasm RNAs during zebrafish oogenesis. Mech Dev. 2007;124:279–289. [PubMed] A very thorough analysis of the 3’UTR of dazl involving a series of transgenic animals demonstrates that distinct regions are required for successive steps in dazl localization during early oogenesis and in germ plasm localization in the embryo, implicating a more general utility of the early Xenopus METRO oogenesis localization pathway in zebrafish.
17. Kloc M, Etkin LD. Two distinct pathways for the localization of RNAs at the vegetal cortex in Xenopus oocytes. Development. 1995;121:287–297. [PubMed]
18. Theusch EV, Brown KJ, Pelegri F. Separate pathways of RNA recruitment lead to the compartmentalization of the zebrafish germ plasm. Dev Biol. 2006;292:129–141. [PubMed]
19. Knaut H, Pelegri F, Bohmann K, Schwarz H, Nusslein-Volhard C. Zebrafish vasa RNA but not its protein is a component of the germ plasm and segregates asymmetrically before germline specification. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:875–888. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Koprunner M, Thisse C, Thisse B, Raz E. A zebrafish nanos-related gene is essential for the development of primordial germ cells. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2877–2885. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Yoon C, Kawakami K, Hopkins N. Zebrafish vasa homologue RNA is localized to the cleavage planes of 2- and 4-cell-stage embryos and is expressed in the primordial germ cells. Development. 1997;124:3157–3165. [PubMed]
22. Marlow FL, Mullins MC. Bucky ball functions in Balbiani body assembly and animal-vegetal polarity in the oocyte and follicle cell layer in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2008;321:40–50. [PubMed] This is a study of the first mutant in vertebrates known to be defective in Balbiani formation, the earliest oocyte asymmetric structure in vertebrates, which is conserved from insects to mammals and first described over 150 years ago. The analysis implicates this gene in setting up the animal-vegetal axis of early oocytes and shows that patterning of the oocyte and surrounding follicle cell layer is coordinated, likely through a signaling mechanism.
23. Bontems F, Stein A, Marlow F, Lyautey J, Gupta T, Mullins MC, Dosch R. Bucky Ball Organizes Germ Plasm Assembly in Zebrafish. Curr Biol. 2009 [PubMed] This study identifies the molecular nature of the bucky ball gene as a novel, rapidly evolving gene and demonstrates that its over expression can result in ectopic germ cells, implicating it in germ plasm assembly.
24. Kloc M, Larabell C, Etkin LD. Elaboration of the messenger transport organizer pathway for localization of RNA to the vegetal cortex of Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol. 1996;180:119–130. [PubMed]
25. King ML, Messitt TJ, Mowry KL. Putting RNAs in the right place at the right time: RNA localization in the frog oocyte. Biol Cell. 2005;97:19–33. [PubMed]
26. Claussen M, Pieler T. Xvelo1 uses a novel 75-nucleotide signal sequence that drives vegetal localization along the late pathway in Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol. 2004;266:270–284. [PubMed]
27. Jenny A, Hachet O, Zavorszky P, Cyrklaff A, Weston MD, Johnston DS, Erdelyi M, Ephrussi A. A translation-independent role of oskar RNA in early Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 2006;133:2827–2833. [PubMed]
28. Mei W, Lee KW, Marlow F, Miller AL, Mullins MC. hnRNP/brom bones is required for Ca -mediated egg activation in the zebrafish. Development. In press.
29. Besse F, Lopez de Quinto S, Marchand V, Trucco A, Ephrussi A. Drosophila PTB promotes formation of high-order RNP particles and represses oskar translation. Genes Dev. 2009;23:195–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Robida MD, Singh R. Drosophila polypyrimidine-tract binding protein (PTB) functions specifically in the male germline. Embo J. 2003;22:2924–2933. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Cote CA, Gautreau D, Denegre JM, Kress TL, Terry NA, Mowry KL. A Xenopus protein related to hnRNP I has a role in cytoplasmic RNA localization. Mol Cell. 1999;4:431–437. [PubMed]
32. Kress TL, Yoon YJ, Mowry KL. Nuclear RNP complex assembly initiates cytoplasmic RNA localization. J Cell Biol. 2004;165:203–211. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Czaplinski K, Mattaj IW. 40Lo Ve interacts with Vg1RBP/Vera and hnRNP I in binding the Vg1-localization element. Rna. 2006;12:213–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Lewis RA, Gagnon JA, Mowry KL. PTB/hnRNP I is required for RNP remodeling during RNA localization in Xenopus oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:678–686. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Yabe T, Ge X, Pelegri F. The zebrafish maternal-effect gene cellular atoll encodes the centriolar component sas-6 and defects in its paternal function promote whole genome duplication. Dev Biol. 2007;312:44–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Yabe T, Ge X, Lin R, Nair S, Runke G, Mullins MC, Pelegri F. The Maternal-Effect Gene cellular island Encodes Aurora B Kinase and Is Essential for Furrow Formation in the Early Zebrafish Embryo. PLoS Genet. in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Vader G, Medema RH, Lens SM. The chromosomal passenger complex: guiding Aurora-B through mitosis. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:833–837. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Golling G, Amsterdam A, Sun Z, Antonelli M, Maldonado E, Chen W, Burgess S, Haldi M, Artzt K, Farrington S, et al. Insertional mutagenesis in zebrafish rapidly identifies genes essential for early vertebrate development. Nat Genet. 2002;31:135–140. [PubMed]
39. Lyman Gingerich J, Westfall TA, Slusarski DC, Pelegri F. hecate, a zebrafish maternal effect gene, affects dorsal organizer induction and intracellular calcium transient frequency. Dev Biol. 2005;286:427–439. [PubMed]
40. Lyman Gingerich J, Lindeman R, Putiri E, Stolzmann K, Pelegri F. Analysis of axis induction mutant embryos reveals morphogenetic events associated with zebrafish yolk extension formation. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2749–2760. [PubMed]
41. Nojima H, Shimizu T, Kim CH, Yabe T, Bae YK, Muraoka O, Hirata T, Chitnis A, Hirano T, Hibi M. Genetic evidence for involvement of maternally derived Wnt canonical signaling in dorsal determination in zebrafish. Mech Dev. 2004;121:371–386. [PubMed]
42. Bellipanni G, Varga M, Maegawa S, Imai Y, Kelly C, Myers AP, Chu F, Talbot WS, Weinberg ES. Essential and opposing roles of zebrafish beta-catenins in the formation of dorsal axial structures and neurectoderm. Development. 2006;133:1299–1309. [PubMed]
43. Erter CE, Wilm TP, Basler N, Wright CV, Solnica-Krezel L. Wnt8 is required in lateral mesendodermal precursors for neural posteriorization in vivo. Development. 2001;128:3571–3583. [PubMed]
44. Lekven AC, Thorpe CJ, Waxman JS, Moon RT. Zebrafish wnt8 encodes two wnt8 proteins on a bicistronic transcript and is required for mesoderm and neurectoderm patterning. Dev Cell. 2001;1:103–114. [PubMed]
45. Varga M, Maegawa S, Bellipanni G, Weinberg ES. Chordin expression, mediated by Nodal and FGF signaling, is restricted by redundant function of two beta-catenins in the zebrafish embryo. Mech Dev. 2007;124:775–791. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Reim G, Brand M. Maternal control of vertebrate dorsoventral axis formation and epiboly by the POU domain protein Spg/Pou2/Oct4. Development. 2006;133:2757–2770. [PubMed]
47. Lachnit M, Kur E, Driever W. Alterations of the cytoskeleton in all three embryonic lineages contribute to the epiboly defect of Pou5f1/Oct4 deficient MZspg zebrafish embryos. Dev Biol. 2008;315:1–17. [PubMed]
48. Lunde K, Belting HG, Driever W. Zebrafish pou5f1/pou2, homolog of mammalian Oct4, functions in the endoderm specification cascade. Curr Biol. 2004;14:48–55. [PubMed]
49. Reim G, Mizoguchi T, Stainier DY, Kikuchi Y, Brand M. The POU domain protein spg (pou2/Oct4) is essential for endoderm formation in cooperation with the HMG domain protein casanova. Dev Cell. 2004;6:91–101. [PubMed]
50. Holloway BA, Gomez de la Torre Canny S, Ye Y, Slusarski DC, Freisinger CM, Dosch R, Chou MM, Wagner DS, Mullins MC. A novel role for MAPKAPK2 in morphogenesis during zebrafish development. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000413. [PubMed] This study identifies an unanticipated role for MAPKAPK2 and p38 MAP kinase in modulating a marginal constrictive force acting in zebrafish epiboly, providing novel molecular insight into this still poorly understood tissue morphogenesis process.
51. Lukas SM, Kroe RR, Wildeson J, Peet GW, Frego L, Davidson W, Ingraham RH, Pargellis CA, Labadia ME, Werneburg BG. Catalysis and function of the p38 alpha.MK2a signaling complex. Biochemistry. 2004;43:9950–9960. [PubMed]
52. Giraldez AJ, Cinalli RM, Glasner ME, Enright AJ, Thomson JM, Baskerville S, Hammond SM, Bartel DP, Schier AF. MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science. 2005;308:833–838. [PubMed]
53. Bushati N, Cohen SM. microRNA functions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007;23:175–205. [PubMed]
54. Schier AF, Giraldez AJ. MicroRNA function and mechanism: insights from zebra fish. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2006;71:195–203. [PubMed]
55. Draper BW, McCallum CM, Moens CB. nanos1 is required to maintain oocyte production in adult zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2007;305:589–598. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Mishima Y, Giraldez AJ, Takeda Y, Fujiwara T, Sakamoto H, Schier AF, Inoue K. Differential regulation of germline mRNAs in soma and germ cells by zebrafish miR-430. Curr Biol. 2006;16:2135–2142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Kedde M, Strasser MJ, Boldajipour B, Oude Vrielink JA, Slanchev K, le Sage C, Nagel R, Voorhoeve PM, van Duijse J, Orom UA, et al. RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA. Cell. 2007;131:1273–1286. [PubMed] This study demonstrates that the vertebrate-specific RNA binding protein Dnd, essential for germ line development in zebrafish and mouse, but previously of unknown molecular function, acts by blocking miRNA-mediated gene silencing in zebrafish germ cells and in cultured human cells. Dnd binds to a U-rich site in the 3’UTR of regulated transcripts that, in a still unknown manner, blocks miRNA binding.
58. Slanchev K, Stebler J, Goudarzi M, Cojocaru V, Weidinger G, Raz E. Control of dead end localization and activity--implications for the function of the protein in antagonizing miRNA function. Mech Dev. 2009;126:270–277. [PubMed]
59. Weidinger G, Stebler J, Slanchev K, Dumstrei K, Wise C, Lovell-Badge R, Thisse C, Thisse B, Raz E. dead end, a novel vertebrate germ plasm component, is required for zebrafish primordial germ cell migration and survival. Curr Biol. 2003;13:1429–1434. [PubMed]
60. Kuramochi-Miyagawa S, Kimura T, Ijiri TW, Isobe T, Asada N, Fujita Y, Ikawa M, Iwai N, Okabe M, Deng W, et al. Mili, a mammalian member of piwi family gene, is essential for spermatogenesis. Development. 2004;131:839–849. [PubMed]
61. Cox DN, Chao A, Lin H. piwi encodes a nucleoplasmic factor whose activity modulates the number and division rate of germline stem cells. Development. 2000;127:503–514. [PubMed]
62. Pal-Bhadra M, Bhadra U, Birchler JA. RNAi related mechanisms affect both transcriptional and posttranscriptional transgene silencing in Drosophila. Mol Cell. 2002;9:315–327. [PubMed]
63. Siegfried KR, Nusslein-Volhard C. Germ line control of female sex determination in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2008;324:277–287. [PubMed]
64. Slanchev K, Stebler J, de la Cueva-Mendez G, Raz E. Development without germ cells: the role of the germ line in zebrafish sex differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4074–4079. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Aravin AA, Sachidanandam R, Girard A, Fejes-Toth K, Hannon GJ. Developmentally regulated piRNA clusters implicate MILI in transposon control. Science. 2007;316:744–747. [PubMed]
66. Carmell MA, Girard A, van de Kant HJ, Bourc’his D, Bestor TH, de Rooij DG, Hannon GJ. MIWI2 is essential for spermatogenesis and repression of transposons in the mouse male germline. Dev Cell. 2007;12:503–514. [PubMed]
67. Ciruna B, Weidinger G, Knaut H, Thisse B, Thisse C, Raz E, Schier AF. Production of maternal-zygotic mutant zebrafish by germ-line replacement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14919–14924. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Theodosiou NA, Xu T. Use of FLP/FRT system to study Drosophila development. Methods. 1998;14:355–365. [PubMed]
69. Khakhar RR, Cobb JA, Bjergbaek L, Hickson ID, Gasser SM. RecQ helicases: multiple roles in genome maintenance. Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13:493–501. [PubMed]
70. Xie J, Bessling SL, Cooper TK, Dietz HC, McCallion AS, Fisher S. Manipulating mitotic recombination in the zebrafish embryo through RecQ helicases. Genetics. 2007;176:1339–1342. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Nasevicius A, Ekker SC. Effective targeted gene ’knockdown’ in zebrafish. Nat Genet. 2000;26:216–220. [PubMed]
72. Draper BW, Morcos PA, Kimmel CB. Inhibition of zebrafish fgf8 pre-mRNA splicing with morpholino oligos: a quantifiable method for gene knockdown. Genesis. 2001;30:154–156. [PubMed]
73. Doyon Y, McCammon JM, Miller JC, Faraji F, Ngo C, Katibah GE, Amora R, Hocking TD, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, et al. Heritable targeted gene disruption in zebrafish using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:702–708. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Meng X, Noyes MB, Zhu LJ, Lawson ND, Wolfe SA. Targeted gene inactivation in zebrafish using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:695–701. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Foley JE, Yeh JR, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Sander JD, Peterson RT, Joung JK. Rapid mutation of endogenous zebrafish genes using zinc finger nucleases made by Oligomerized Pool ENgineering (OPEN) PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4348. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links