![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright Sim et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Innate Immune Responses of Pulmonary Epithelial Cells to Burkholderia pseudomallei Infection 1Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute, DSO National Laboratories, Singapore, Republic of Singapore 2Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore Lisa F. P. Ng, Editor Singapore Immunology Network, Singapore * E-mail: tgekyen/at/dso.org.sg Conceived and designed the experiments: SHS YL SPS EEO GT. Performed the experiments: SHS DW VN SPS TWT. Analyzed the data: SHS. Wrote the paper: SHS YL EEO GT. Received May 28, 2009; Accepted September 15, 2009. Abstract Background Burkholderia pseudomallei, a facultative intracellular pathogen, causes systemic infection in humans with high mortality especially when infection occurs through an infectious aerosol. Previous studies indicated that the epithelial cells in the lung are an active participant in host immunity. In this study, we aimed to investigate the innate immune responses of lung epithelial cells against B. pseudomallei. Methodology and Principal Findings Using a murine lung epithelial cell line, primary lung epithelial cells and an inhalational murine infection model, we characterized the types of innate immunity proteins and peptides produced upon B. pseudomallei infection. Among a wide panel of immune components studied, increased levels of major pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNFα, chemokine MCP-1, and up-regulation of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20) were observed. Inhibition assays using specific inhibitors suggested that NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways were responsible for these B. pseudomallei-induced antimicrobial peptides. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the respiratory epithelial cells, which form the majority of the cells lining the epithelial tract and the lung, have important roles in the innate immune response against B. pseudomallei infection. Introduction Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent for melioidosis, is an environmental saphrophyte that is found most commonly in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia [1]–[3]. In endemic regions such as northeast Thailand, infections by B. pseudomallei account for up to 36% of fatal community-acquired pneumonia [4]. Infection results in a diverse array of clinical manifestations ranging from acute septicemia to chronic disease, and can occur via multiple routes such as ingestion, inhalation or percutaneous inoculation [5]. The inhalational route of infection is associated with high mortality rates [6], [7]. Epidemiological observations have indicated that onset of pulmonary infections can develop as early as 2 days following an inhalational exposure of B. pseudomallei, especially for individuals with pre-existing medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus and renal failure [6], [8]. A study in Australia indicated a significant increased incidence of melioidosis cases with pneumonia and septicaemia during the monsoon season with heavy rainfall [6]. In Banda Aceh, a month after the Asian tsunami, B. pseudomallei was cultured from the pleural fluids of 25 patients [9]. In Singapore, a significantly high percentage of pneumonic melioidosis cases (76.7% of 43 cases) was observed during a three month monsoon season in early 2004 compared to the annual mean (from 1999 to 2003) of 33.9% [10]. It is postulated that infectious aerosol generated with the monsoon rain lead to increased incidence of pneumonic melioidosis. Unlike other internal organs, the vulnerability of the lungs to infection arises from the continuous exposure of its vast surface area (150 m2) to a large variety and quantity of microorganisms in the inhaled air [11], and hence are vulnerable to inhalational inoculation with B. pseudomallei. Furthermore, the rich network of capillaries also makes it vulnerable to hematogenous spread of B. pseudomallei. In B. pseudomallei infection, macrophages are well-known to be the sentinel cells involved in host immune defense against the bacteria. Upon activation, alveolar macrophages can initiate a series of inflammatory responses that are targeted at clearing the inoculum [12]–[14]. Recent evidence from studies on other lung pathogens, however, suggests that pulmonary epithelial cells, which are among the first cells to come into contact with the pathogen, also play an important role in host innate immunity [15]–[17]. Infection of human lung epithelial cells with Mycoplasma pneumoniae resulted in increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin IL-8, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and IL-1β mRNA [17]. Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) was also able to stimulate antimicrobial peptide, human beta-defensin-2 (HBD-2) mRNA expression in human lung epithelial cells [15]. Hence, the extensive studies on B. pseudomallei pathogenesis using monocyte/macrophages may have missed the important interaction between the bacterium and the lung epithelial cells. Although an earlier study tried to address the response of lung epithelial cells to B. pseudomallei infection, it focused only on IL-8 production [18]. In this study, we utilized a murine lung epithelial cell line, primary murine lung epithelial cells as well as a murine model of inhalational infection to elucidate in greater detail the role of lung epithelial cells in the innate immune response to B. pseudomallei. A wide spectrum of important immune proteins and antimicrobial peptides in lung epithelial cells were examined. Our data suggests that the epithelium which constitutes the majority of cells in the lung is capable of eliciting a wide spectrum of key immune proteins and peptides against B. pseudomallei, indicating that epithelial cells, like macrophages, are also sentinel cells in the lung and these cells are important for first line of defence against inhaled B. pseudomallei. Methods Animals Female BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice aged 6- to 8-week old were purchased from the Center for Animal Resources in National University of Singapore. The mice were maintained in polystyrene cages with shaved wood bedding and fed with commercial pellets (PMI Nutrition International, USA) prior to the experiment. All animal procedures were approved (in writing) by the Animal Care and Use Committee, DSO National Laboratories. Bacterial strain and culture B. pseudomallei, KHW, was obtained from the B. pseudomallei strains collection at DMERI, DSO National Laboratories. For infection assays, single colony of KHW was grown overnight in 5 ml tryptone soy broth (TSB) (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan) at 37°C for 16 h. The bacterial culture was then diluted 1 20 in 20 ml TSB and grown for 3 h at 37°C for the bacteria to reach log phase. Subsequently, the bacteria pellet was harvested by centrifugation at 2000 g for 15 min and resuspended in Kaighn's modification of Ham's F12 (F12K) medium to an OD600 nm of 1.0 (equivalent to a concentration of 108 bacteria per ml) and used for subsequent infection assays.Cell line and culture All cell culture reagents were purchased from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, N.Y.) unless otherwise stated. Murine lung epithelial cell line, LA-4, was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA) and grown in F12K medium containing 15% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37°C in 5% CO2. Preparation of primary lung epithelial cells from BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice Isolation of primary epithelial cells from the lungs of BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice was performed as previously described [19], with slight modifications. Briefly, lungs were excised from 15 BALB/c or C57Bl/6 mice and cut into 1-mm3 pieces. Epithelial cells were then dissociated from the lung tissues with collagenase A (2 mg/ml) (Roche Diagnostics GmBH, Mannheim, Germany) in the presence of penicillin (100 IU/ml)-streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) in F12K medium for 2 h at 37°C. The cells were then centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min and treated with F12k containing 2 U/ml Deoxyribonuclease I (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) for 5 min at 25°C. The epithelial organoids were then harvested at 500 g for 15 s. This step was repeated six times. Subsequently, the pellet of epithelial organoids was then treated with red blood cell (RBC) lysis buffer for 10 min at 25°C and washed once with F12K medium. The cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45 PE (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), and depletion of CD45+ cells was carried out using anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi-Biotech, California, USA). After the purification procedure, the absence of CD45+ cells was verified by flow cytometry analysis with anti-mouse CD45 PE. No CD45+ cells were detected (Figure 1A
Invasion assays LA-4 cells were seeded at a density of 2.5×106 cells/ml into 6-well plates (Nunc, Denmark) and primary lung epithelial cells were seeded at a density of 2×105 cell /ml in 96-well plate (Nunc, Denmark). Invasion assay was performed using a method described previously by Elsinghorst (1994) [20] with slight modifications. The cultured lung epithelial cells were infected with KHW at a multiplicity of infection of 1 5 for 2 h. For the negative control, F12K medium was added instead of live bacteria. Subsequently, the cells were washed thrice with 1X PBS and covered with F12K medium containing 250 µg/ml kanamycin to eliminate the extracellular bacteria. After the bacterial infection described above, the supernatant at 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h and 48 h post infection was collected and filtered through a 0.22 µm filter (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA) for further cytokine analysis.To determine the intracellular bacteria, the cells were washed thrice with 1X PBS and lysed with 1% triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Viable intracellular bacteria were counted by plating onto TSA agar plates. The assay was repeated twice and each assay was carried out in triplicates, results were expressed as log10 of CFU per 106 LA-4 cells. For NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways inhibition experiments, LA-4 cells were pre-incubated with or without 10 µM of BAY11-7082 and SB203580 (Calbiochem, San Diego, California) for 1 h prior to the infection process. Cytokine assays The presence of IL-10, IL-12p70, IFNγ, IL-6, MCP-1 and TNFα in the supernatants was analyzed using FACSArray Bioanalyzer and Cytometric Bead Array according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Briefly, culture supernatant was incubated with equal volume of each cytokine-specific capture beads for 1 h at room temperature. The detection reagent was then added to the reaction mixture for 1 h prior to analysis on FACSArray Bioanalyzer. The assay was repeated twice and each assay was carried out in triplicates. RNA isolation and quantitive real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) Total RNA was isolated from the epithelial cells using TRizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). At different time-points post infection, the medium was completely removed and TRizol was added to epithelial cells for 5 min. Following that, 0.2 ml chloroform per ml of TRizol was added and the mixture was centrifuged at 10000 g for 30 min at 4°C. The aqueous layer was collected and RNA was precipitated with isopropanol. The RNA was then reverse transcribed to cDNA using the SuperScript III platinum two-step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) on iCycler iQ (Biorad) was carried out as follows: single UDG incubation step at 50°C for 2 min, single pre-denaturation step at 95°C for 2 min, 45 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. The sequences of the primers were given in Table 1. The fold change in the sample gene, given by delta-delta Ct (ΔΔCt), is determined by the following equation: ΔΔCT = ΔCT (sample)−ΔCT (calibrator), and ΔCT is the CT of the target gene (sample or calibrator) subtracted from the Ct the housekeeping gene, actin. [21]. Using this method, a positive fold change would represent up-regulation of the sample gene compared to the calibrator; whereas a negative fold change would represent down-regulation of the sample gene compared to the calibrator.
Mice infection Groups of six BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice were infected intranasally with 34 to 46 CFU (colony forming unit) of KHW. For control groups, mice were administrated with 1X PBS. At each time-point (4 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h) post infection, one group of KHW-infected and one group of control mice were euthanasized using CO2 and the lungs of the mice were homogenized in 1X PBS. For determination of expression levels of the antimicrobial peptide genes, lysozyme, CCL20 and SLPI, the lung homogenate was resuspended in 2 volumes of Trizol LS reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) and RNA extraction and real-time quantitative RT-PCR were carried out as described above. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was done with Student's t test. A probability of P<0.05 was considered significant. All experiments were conducted at least twice and experimental data were presented as mean value ± the standard deviation of experimental triplicates. Results B. pseudomallei can invade and multiply in murine lung epithelial cells In order to assess the invasiveness and multiplication of B. pseudomallei in LA-4 cells, we quantified the number of intracellular bacteria at 0 h, 2 h, 6 h and 24 h post KHW infection. Upon infection with KHW, 0.114±0.017% of the total inoculated bacteria were internalized into LA-4 cells (Table 2). After entry into the host cells, the bacteria multiplied rapidly and by 24 h post infection, there was a 43.7-fold increase in the number of intracellular bacteria. During these time intervals, more than 80% of the B. pseudomallei-infected cells remained viable as determined by measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity released from damaged cells (data not shown).
TLR2 and TLR4 are expressed in murine lung epithelial cells and up-regulated upon B. pseudomallei infection To explore the responsiveness of LA-4 murine lung epithelial cells to B. pseudomallei infection, we tested for the expression level of TLR2 and TLR4 in the cells using qRT-PCR. TLR2 and TLR4 transcripts were detected in uninfected LA-4 cells (Data not shown). Upon infection with B. pseudomallei, the expression levels of TLR2 and TLR4 increased gradually and a significant up-regulation compared to control cells was observed at 24 h post infection (p<0.05) (Figure 2A
B. pseudomallei infection of murine lung epithelial cells induces the secretion of proinflammatory mediators The release of a panel of cytokines and chemokines including IL-10, IL-12p70, IFNγ, IL-6, MCP-1 and TNFα in LA-4 murine lung epithelial cells was then determined as a measure of inflammatory responses against B. pseudomallei infection. Upon infection with B. pseudomallei, there was a significant increase in the level of secreted MCP-1 compared to control cells (p<0.05) at 48 h post B. pseudomallei infection (Figure 3
This data was further validated using primary epithelial cells isolated from the lungs of BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice. Infection of primary lung epithelial cells from BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice with B. pseudomllei, KHW resulted in similar infection kinetics (Table S1) and cell monolayer integrity as in LA-4 cells. However, significant increase in the production of IL-6 and TNFα in addition to MCP-1 was observed (p<0.05) (Figure 4
Burkholderia pseudomallei infection induces differential expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in murine lung epithelial cells To determine the relevance of antimicrobial peptides in epithelial innate immune defence against B. pseudomallei, we studied the expression of various antimicrobial peptide genes (murine cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide CRAMP, lysozyme, CCL20, SLPI, Surfactant protein A, Surfactant protein D, β-Defensin14) in KHW-infected LA-4 murine lung epithelial cells and primary BALB/c and C57Bl/6 lung epithelial cells using qRT-PCR. We observed differential expression only for lysozyme, CCL20 and SLPI, but not for CRAMP, Surfactant A, Surfactant D and β-Defensin14. In LA-4 cells, infection with B. pseudomallei resulted in significant down-regulation of lysozyme and significant up-regulation of CCL20 and SLPI at 6 h and 24 h post infection compared to uninfected control cells (p<0.05) (Figure 5A
Antimicrobial peptide genes are also differentially regulated in in vivo mouse model To further investigate the significance of these observed differential expression of antimicrobial peptide genes, lysozyme, CCL20 and SLPI, BALB/c mice were infected intranasally with 34 to 46 CFU of KHW, equivalent to twice the lethal dose 50, LD50, as determined previously [7]. The expression of the antimicrobial peptide genes, lysozyme, CCL20 and SLPI, at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post infection was determined using qRT-PCR. Only results from one infection experiment (34 CFU) was shown. Upon infection, the bacteria multiplied rapidly in the host and by 72 h post infection, the bacteria load in the lung had increased to 6.79±5.12 log10 of CFU of bacteria (Table 3). Correspondingly, CCL20 was significantly up-regulated at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post infection (p<0.05) and SLPI was significantly up-regulated at 48 h and 72 h post infection (p<0.05) (Figure 6
Lysozyme, SLPI and CCL20 are regulated by the NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways In order to elucidate the pathways that are involved in the regulated expression of the antimicrobial peptide genes, lysozyme, CCL20 and SLPI, LA-4 cells were pre-incubated with specific inhibitors of NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways (BAY11-7082 and SB203580 respectively) prior to the infection process. Pre-incubation of the epithelial cells with BAY11-7082 (10 µM) significantly impaired the up-regulation of all three CCL20, lysozyme and SLPI genes upon B. pseudomallei KHW infection compared to untreated cell controls (p<0.05) (Figure 7
Discussion Host innate immune response is a crucial event for early containment of B. pseudomallei infection due to the long latency period between pathogen exposure to the onset of clinical symptoms and the time taken for diagnosis of the disease due to its wide range of clinical manifestations [22], [23]. Currently, in melioidosis, studies on the initial innate immune response to B. pseudomallei infection have focused on macrophages, neutrophils and NK cells [24], [25]. Epithelial cells occupy a large surface area in the lung and could play a central role in inducing protective immune response against microbial pathogens [26]–[32]. Pulmonary epithelial cells could also represent one of the most immediate targets in a pulmonary B. pseudomallei infection. However, knowledge on how epithelial cells respond to B. pseudomallei is limited. In the current study, using a well-established murine lung epithelial cell line, LA-4, and primary lung epithelial cells isolated from the lungs of BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice, we sought to characterize for the first time the immune factors that are involved in epithelial-mediated immunoreaction against B. pseudomallei infection in the lung of infected host. We demonstrated that LA-4 mouse lung epithelial cells express TLR2 and TLR4, the innate immunity receptors in Gram-negative bacteria, and these receptors were up-regulated upon exposure to B. pseudomallei. TLR activation initiates the expression of important mediators and was crucial for inducing the innate immune responses in the epithelium and causing subsequent inflammation [31]. Cytokine secretion is an early event in the innate host response that alerts the immune system to the presence of a microbial pathogen. Infection of human alveolar epithelial cells with Francisella tularensis resulted in increase levels of multiple cytokines including granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-8, MCP-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP-1α) [33]. Induction of IL-6 gene expression was also observed in bronchial epithelial cells infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa [34]. In B. pseudomallei-infected murine lung epithelial cells, the levels of IL-6, MCP-1 and TNFα were increased significantly compared to the uninfected control cells. In addition, substantial increase in cytokine production was observed much earlier in the primary cells (6 h) as opposed to the cell line (24 h), possibly due to altered immune responses in the LA-4 lung adenoma cells. The kinetics of cytokine production by these murine lung epithelial cells differs slightly from those previously reported in the lungs of B. pseudomallei-infected mice [7]; specifically IFNγ was not detected in the epithelial cells. This discrepancy is likely to be due to the fact that NK cells are the main sources of IFNγ in the lung [23], and that epithelial cells are incapable of IFNγ production. The production of IL-6, TNFα and MCP-1 by murine lung epithelial cells, however, were consistent with previously reported in vivo studies [7], [35]. In pneumonic melioidosis patients, elevated plasma levels of IL-6 and TNFα have also been described [36], [37]. IL-6 and TNFα were previously known to play an important role in controlling the rapid dissemination of the bacteria upon infection [23], [35]. Although Easton et. al. (2007) have shown that neutrophils are the major producer of IL-6 and TNFα in the lungs [24], our data extends this observation to epithelial cells, which also appear to be an important source of IL-6 and TNFα. In fact, epithelial IL-6 has also been suggested to increase neutrophil intracellular calcium ions, causing neutrophil activation [38]. Besides IL-6 and TNFα, epithelial cells also appear to be another important source of MCP-1 production in the lungs. MCP-1 is a protein that attracts and activates mononuclear cells and may be a critical regulator of mononuclear cell migration [39]. In Listeria monocytogenes, it was determined using a murine model that MCP-1 was an important chemotactic factor for mononuclear cells [40]. Clearance of the bacteria was observed upon the recruitment of monocytes. Deletion of MCP-1 gene resulted in partially impaired monocyte recruitment, reduced clearance of bacteria in the spleen and enhanced susceptibility to infection [40]. Thus, our findings that murine lung epithelial cells were able to secrete IL-6, TNFα and MCP-1 suggest that lung epithelial cells are capable of early production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which are important components in the innate immune response. It is known that endogenously produced antimicrobial proteins are associated with host defense against bacterial infections [15], [41], [42]. However, the role of antimicrobial peptide in pulmonary infection by B. pseudomallei has not been well-studied. Our current study addresses the expression profile of a wide spectrum of antimicrobial peptides (CRAMP, lysozyme, CCL20, SLPI, Surfactant A, Surfactant D, β-Defensin14) in murine lung epithelial cells upon B. pseudomallei infection. Our findings showing up-regulation of CCL20 and SLPI in B. pseudomallei-infected in vitro cultured cells and in vivo mouse model indicate an epithelial-initiated anti-microbial response against B. pseudomallei. Indeed, previous studies have shown that the up-regulation of CCL20 followed by its interaction with CC chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6) is responsible for the chemoattraction of immature dendritic cells (DC), effector/memory T-cells and B-cells to the site of inflammation [43], [44]. CCL20 has been shown to exert antimicrobial activity against a wide spectrum of Gram-negative bacteria [45]. SLPI was also known to exhibit multiple functions, including inhibition of protease activity, microbial growth, and inflammatory responses [46]. In Streptococcus pneumoniae-infected mice, the amount of SLPI mRNA transcripts in the lung was three times higher than the baseline at 10 h after bacterial inoculation [47]. Interestingly, we observed significant down-regulation in the lysozyme gene expression in the epithelial cells upon B. pseudomallei infection. An increased expression of lysozyme has been shown to be associated with enhanced bacterial killing, decreased systemic dissemination and improved survival following infection [48]. The observation that lysozyme gene was down-regulated during B. pseudomallei infection could thus imply that lysozyme is dispensable against B. pseudomallei infection. Alternatively, it suggests that B. pseudomallei may have an immune-escape mechanism to suppress its expression in order to promote its survivability in the host. Experiment to investigate the role of lysozyme in B. pseudomallei colonization and dissemination is currently underway. Similar down-regulation of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides have previously been detected in gut mucosa biopsies from patients with shigellosis and in Shigella-infected epithelial cells [49], [50]. Nevertheless, our findings that CCL20 and SLPI genes were up-regulated and lysozyme gene was down-regulated following B. pseudomallei infection indicate that B. pseudomallei could interfere with host regulation of genes encoding different antimicrobial peptides in different ways. Activation of cell signaling pathways is crucial for the induction of antimicrobial genes expression upon pathogen exposure. In gastric epithelial cells, infection with Helicobacter pylori results in the activation of the NF-kB pathway, leading to CCL20 gene transcription [51]. Furthermore, blockage of the NF-kB and p38 MAPK pathways impaired CCL20 production [52]. We demonstrated in pulmonary epithelial cells that antimicrobial peptides CCL20 and SLPI were regulated by both NF-κB pathway and p38 MAPK pathway, whereas lysozyme was regulated only by NF-κB pathway. Our results therefore suggest that cell signaling pathways, NF-κB as well as p38 MAPK, govern the expression of specific antimicrobial peptides in pulmonary epithelial cells. The findings of our study indicate that pulmonary epithelial cells play important roles in the innate immune response against B. pseudomallei in the lung and cannot be ignored in studies investigating the pathogenesis of pulmonary melioidosis. Further studies on whether the immune factors identified here confer protection against melioidosis could lead to the identification of important therapeutic targets. Figure S1 (0.25 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file.(244K, doc) Table S1 (0.03 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file.(33K, doc) Acknowledgments We are grateful to Ms Aw Lay Tin for her support in bacterial culture and Ms Tan Chin Mei, Jerlyn for her help in qRT-PCR analysis. Footnotes Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Funding: This study was supported by a grant from Defence Science & Technology Agency, Singapore. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. References 1. Cheng AC, Currie BJ. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:383–416. [PubMed] 2. Dance DA. Melioidosis as an emerging global problem. Acta Trop. 2000;74:115–119. [PubMed] 3. Dance DA. Melioidosis: the tip of the iceberg? Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991;4:52–60. [PubMed] 4. Boonsawat W, Boonma P, Tangdajahiran T, Paupermpoonsiri S, Wongpratoom W, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia in adults at Srinagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 1990;73:345–352. [PubMed] 5. White NJ. Melioidosis. Lancet. 2003;361:1715–1722. [PubMed] 6. Currie BJ, Jacups SP. Intensity of rainfall and severity of melioidosis, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1538–1542. [PubMed] 7. Tan GY, Liu Y, Sivalingam SP, Sim SH, Wang D, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei aerosol infection results in differential inflammatory responses in BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:508–515. [PubMed] 8. Currie B, Howard D, Nguyen VT, Withnall K, Merianos A. The 1990-1991 outbreak of melioidosis in the Northern Territory of Australia: clinical aspects. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1993;24:436–443. [PubMed] 9. Potera C. In disaster's wake: tsunami lung. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:A734. [PubMed] 10. Liu Y, Loh JP, Aw LT, Yap EP, Lee MA, et al. Rapid molecular typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei, isolated in an outbreak of melioidosis in Singapore in 2004, based on variable-number tandem repeats. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;100:687–692. [PubMed] 11. Rogan MP, Geraghty P, Greene CM, O'Neill SJ, Taggart CC, et al. Antimicrobial proteins and polypeptides in pulmonary innate defence. Respir Res. 2006;7:29. [PubMed] 12. Breitbach K, Klocke S, Tschernig T, van Rooijen N, Baumann U, et al. Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase and NADPH oxidase in early control of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection in mice. Infect Immun. 2006;74:6300–6309. [PubMed] 13. Miyagi K, Kawakami K, Saito A. Role of reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates in gamma interferon-stimulated murine macrophage bactericidal activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect Immun. 1997;65:4108–4113. [PubMed] 14. Popov SF, Kurilov V, Lagutin MP. The interaction of the causative agent of melioidosis with the host's alveolar macrophages. Mikrobiol Zh. 1992;54:3–7. [PubMed] 15. Mendez-Samperio P, Miranda E, Trejo A. Regulation of human beta-defensin-2 by Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG): involvement of PKC, JNK, and PI3K in human lung epithelial cell line (A549). Peptides. 2008;29:1657–1663. [PubMed] 16. O'Brien AD, Standiford TJ, Bucknell KA, Wilcoxen SE, Paine R 3rd. Role of alveolar epithelial cell intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:L961–970. [PubMed] 17. Yang J, Hooper WC, Phillips DJ, Talkington DF. Regulation of proinflammatory cytokines in human lung epithelial cells infected with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2002;70:3649–3655. [PubMed] 18. Utaisincharoen P, Anuntagool N, Arjcharoen S, Lengwehasatit I, Limposuwan K, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei stimulates low interleukin-8 production in the human lung epithelial cell line A549. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;138:61–65. [PubMed] 19. Simian M, Hirai Y, Navre M, Werb Z, Lochter A, Bissell MJ. The interplay of matrix metalloproteinases, morphogens and growth factors is necessary for branching of mammary epithelial cells. Development. 2001;128:3117–31. [PubMed] 20. Elsinghorst EA. Measurement of invasion by gentamicin resistance. Methods Enzymol. 1994;236:405–420. [PubMed] 21. Giulietti A, Overbergh L, Valckx D, Decallonne B, Bouillon R, et al. An overview of real-time quantitative PCR: applications to quantify cytokine gene expression. Methods. 2001;25:386–401. [PubMed] 22. Ngauy V, Lemeshev Y, Sadkowski L, Crawford G. Cutaneous melioidosis in a man who was taken as a prisoner of war by the Japanese during World War II. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:970–972. [PubMed] 23. Wiersinga WJ, van der Poll T, White NJ, Day NP, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:272–282. [PubMed] 24. Easton A, Haque A, Chu K, Lukaszewski R, Bancroft GJ. A critical role for neutrophils in resistance to experimental infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:99–107. [PubMed] 25. Utaisincharoen P, Tangthawornchaikul N, Kespichayawattana W, Anuntagool N, Chaisuriya P, et al. Kinetic studies of the production of nitric oxide (NO) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in macrophages stimulated with Burkholderia pseudomallei endotoxin. Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;122:324–329. [PubMed] 26. Bals R, Hiemstra PS. Innate immunity in the lung: how epithelial cells fight against respiratory pathogens. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:327–333. [PubMed] 27. Basu S, Fenton MJ. Toll-like receptors: function and roles in lung disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;286:L887–892. [PubMed] 28. Droemann D, Albrecht D, Gerdes J, Ulmer AJ, Branscheid D, et al. Human lung cancer cells express functionally active Toll-like receptor 9. Respir Res. 2005;6:1. [PubMed] 29. Greene CM, Carroll TP, Smith SG, Taggart CC, Devaney J, et al. TLR-induced inflammation in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2005;174:1638–1646. [PubMed] 30. Hauber HP, Tulic MK, Tsicopoulos A, Wallaert B, Olivenstein R, et al. Toll-like receptors 4 and 2 expression in the bronchial mucosa of patients with cystic fibrosis. Can Respir J. 2005;12:13–18. [PubMed] 31. Hippenstiel S, Opitz B, Schmeck B, Suttorp N. Lung epithelium as a sentinel and effector system in pneumonia–molecular mechanisms of pathogen recognition and signal transduction. Respir Res. 2006;7:97. [PubMed] 32. Zhang Z, Louboutin JP, Weiner DJ, Goldberg JB, Wilson JM. Human airway epithelial cells sense Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection via recognition of flagellin by Toll-like receptor 5. Infect Immun. 2005;73:7151–7160. [PubMed] 33. Gentry M, Taormina J, Pyles RB, Yeager L, Kirtley M, et al. Role of primary human alveolar epithelial cells in host defense against Francisella tularensis infection. Infect Immun. 2007;75:3969–3978. [PubMed] 34. Borgatti M, Bezzerri V, Mancini I, Nicolis E, Dechecchi MC, et al. Induction of IL-6 gene expression in a CF bronchial epithelial cell line by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on transcription factors belonging to the Sp1 superfamily. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;357:977–983. [PubMed] 35. Barnes JL, Ulett GC, Ketheesan N, Clair T, Summers PM, et al. Induction of multiple chemokine and colony-stimulating factor genes in experimental Burkholderia pseudomallei infection. Immunol Cell Biol. 2001;79:490–501. [PubMed] 36. Friedland JS, Suputtamongkol Y, Remick DG, Chaowagul W, Strieter RM, et al. Prolonged elevation of interleukin-8 and interleukin-6 concentrations in plasma and of leukocyte interleukin-8 mRNA levels during septicemic and localized Pseudomonas pseudomallei infection. Infect Immun. 1992;60:2402–2408. [PubMed] 37. Simpson AJ, Smith MD, Weverling GJ, Suputtamongkol Y, Angus BJ, et al. Prognostic value of cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10) and clinical parameters in severe melioidosis. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:621–625. [PubMed] 38. Sitaraman SV, Merlin D, Wang L, Wong M, Gewirtz AT, et al. Neutrophil-epithelial crosstalk at the intestinal lumenal surface mediated by reciprocal secretion of adenosine and IL-6. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:861–869. [PubMed] 39. Baier J, Kruger TE. Induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by Mycoplasma hominis in respiratory epithelial cells. J Investig Med. 2000;48:457–464. 40. Jia T, Serbina NV, Brandl K, Zhong MX, Leiner IM, et al. Additive roles for MCP-1 and MCP-3 in CCR2-mediated recruitment of inflammatory monocytes during Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Immunol. 2008;180:6846–6853. [PubMed] 41. Fahlgren A, Hammarstrom S, Danielsson A, Hammarstrom ML. Increased expression of antimicrobial peptides and lysozyme in colonic epithelial cells of patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;131:90–101. [PubMed] 42. Reviglio VE, Sambuelli RH, Olmedo A, Falco M, Echenique J, et al. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor is an inducible antimicrobial peptide expressed in Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. Mediators Inflamm 2007: 93857. 2007:93857. 43. Schutyser E, Struyf S, Van Damme J. The CC chemokine CCL20 and its receptor CCR6. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14:409–426. [PubMed] 44. Wu YY, Tsai HF, Lin WC, Hsu PI, Shun CT, et al. Upregulation of CCL20 and recruitment of CCR6+ gastric infiltrating lymphocytes in Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Infect Immun. 2007;75:4357–4363. [PubMed] 45. Hoover DM, Boulegue C, Yang D, Oppenheim JJ, Tucker K, et al. The structure of human macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha/CCL20. Linking antimicrobial and CC chemokine receptor-6-binding activities with human beta-defensins. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:37647–37654. [PubMed] 46. Weldon S, Taggart CC. Innate host defense functions of secretory leucoprotease inhibitor. Exp Lung Res. 2007;33:485–491. [PubMed] 47. Abe T, Tominaga Y, Kikuchi T, Watanabe A, Satoh K, et al. Bacterial pneumonia causes augmented expression of the secretory leukoprotease inhibitor gene in the murine lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:1235–1240. [PubMed] 48. Akinbi HT, Epaud R, Bhatt H, Weaver TE. Bacterial killing is enhanced by expression of lysozyme in the lungs of transgenic mice. J Immunol. 2000;165:5760–5766. [PubMed] 49. Islam D, Bandholtz L, Nilsson J, Wigzell H, Christensson B, et al. Downregulation of bactericidal peptides in enteric infections: a novel immune escape mechanism with bacterial DNA as a potential regulator. Nat Med. 2001;7:180–185. [PubMed] 50. Sperandio B, Regnault B, Guo J, Zhang Z, Stanley SL, Jr, et al. Virulent Shigella flexneri subverts the host innate immune response through manipulation of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. J Exp Med. 2008;205:1121–1132. [PubMed] 51. Tomimori K, Uema E, Teruya H, Ishikawa C, Okudaira T, et al. Helicobacter pylori induces CCL20 expression. Infect Immun. 2007;75:5223–5232. [PubMed] 52. Choi SC, Choi EJ, Oh HM, Lee S, Lee JK, et al. DA-9601, a standardized extract of Artemisia asiatica, blocks TNF-alpha-induced IL-8 and CCL20 production by inhibiting p38 kinase and NF-kappaB pathways in human gastric epithelial cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:4850–4858. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Apr; 18(2):383-416.
[Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005]Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991 Jan; 4(1):52-60.
[Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991]J Med Assoc Thai. 1990 Jun; 73(6):345-52.
[J Med Assoc Thai. 1990]Lancet. 2003 May 17; 361(9370):1715-22.
[Lancet. 2003]Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Dec; 9(12):1538-42.
[Emerg Infect Dis. 2003]Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Dec; 9(12):1538-42.
[Emerg Infect Dis. 2003]Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1993 Sep; 24(3):436-43.
[Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1993]Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Nov; 113(11):A734.
[Environ Health Perspect. 2005]Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Jul; 100(7):687-92.
[Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006]Respir Res. 2006 Feb 17; 7():29.
[Respir Res. 2006]Infect Immun. 2006 Nov; 74(11):6300-9.
[Infect Immun. 2006]Mikrobiol Zh. 1992 Jul-Aug; 54(4):3-7.
[Mikrobiol Zh. 1992]Peptides. 2008 Oct; 29(10):1657-63.
[Peptides. 2008]Infect Immun. 2002 Jul; 70(7):3649-55.
[Infect Immun. 2002]Clin Exp Immunol. 2004 Oct; 138(1):61-5.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 2004]Development. 2001 Aug; 128(16):3117-31.
[Development. 2001]Methods Enzymol. 1994; 236():405-20.
[Methods Enzymol. 1994]Methods. 2001 Dec; 25(4):386-401.
[Methods. 2001]J Med Microbiol. 2008 Apr; 57(Pt 4):508-15.
[J Med Microbiol. 2008]J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Feb; 43(2):970-2.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2005]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr; 4(4):272-82.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]J Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1; 195(1):99-107.
[J Infect Dis. 2007]Clin Exp Immunol. 2000 Dec; 122(3):324-9.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 2000]Eur Respir J. 2004 Feb; 23(2):327-33.
[Eur Respir J. 2004]Infect Immun. 2007 Aug; 75(8):3969-78.
[Infect Immun. 2007]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Jun 15; 357(4):977-83.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007]J Med Microbiol. 2008 Apr; 57(Pt 4):508-15.
[J Med Microbiol. 2008]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr; 4(4):272-82.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]J Med Microbiol. 2008 Apr; 57(Pt 4):508-15.
[J Med Microbiol. 2008]Immunol Cell Biol. 2001 Oct; 79(5):490-501.
[Immunol Cell Biol. 2001]Infect Immun. 1992 Jun; 60(6):2402-8.
[Infect Immun. 1992]J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb; 181(2):621-5.
[J Infect Dis. 2000]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr; 4(4):272-82.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]Peptides. 2008 Oct; 29(10):1657-63.
[Peptides. 2008]Clin Exp Immunol. 2003 Jan; 131(1):90-101.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 2003]Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003 Oct; 14(5):409-26.
[Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003]Infect Immun. 2007 Sep; 75(9):4357-63.
[Infect Immun. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2002 Oct 4; 277(40):37647-54.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Infect Immun. 2007 Nov; 75(11):5223-32.
[Infect Immun. 2007]World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug 14; 12(30):4850-8.
[World J Gastroenterol. 2006]