![]() | ![]() |
Formats: |
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 Das Roy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Breast cancer-associated metastasis is significantly increased in a model of autoimmune arthritis 1Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 13400 E. Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, Arizona-85259, USA 2Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC-28223, USA 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1543 Garden Terrace, Charlotte, NC-28232, USA Corresponding author.Lopamudra Das Roy: lroy4/at/uncc.edu; Latha B Pathangey: pathangey.latha/at/mayo.edu; Teresa L Tinder: ttinder/at/uncc.edu; Jorge L Schettini: jschetti/at/uncc.edu; Helen E Gruber: Helen.Gruber/at/carolinashealthcare.org; Pinku Mukherjee: pmukherj/at/uncc.edu Received February 5, 2009; Revisions requested May 14, 2009; Revised July 13, 2009; Accepted July 30, 2009. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Introduction Sites of chronic inflammation are often associated with the establishment and growth of various malignancies including breast cancer. A common inflammatory condition in humans is autoimmune arthritis (AA) that causes inflammation and deformity of the joints. Other systemic effects associated with arthritis include increased cellular infiltration and inflammation of the lungs. Several studies have reported statistically significant risk ratios between AA and breast cancer. Despite this knowledge, available for a decade, it has never been questioned if the site of chronic inflammation linked to AA creates a milieu that attracts tumor cells to home and grow in the inflamed bones and lungs which are frequent sites of breast cancer metastasis. Methods To determine if chronic inflammation induced by autoimmune arthritis contributes to increased breast cancer-associated metastasis, we generated mammary gland tumors in SKG mice that were genetically prone to develop AA. Two breast cancer cell lines, one highly metastatic (4T1) and the other non-metastatic (TUBO) were used to generate the tumors in the mammary fat pad. Lung and bone metastasis and the associated inflammatory milieu were evaluated in the arthritic versus the non-arthritic mice. Results We report a three-fold increase in lung metastasis and a significant increase in the incidence of bone metastasis in the pro-arthritic and arthritic mice compared to non-arthritic control mice. We also report that the metastatic breast cancer cells augment the severity of arthritis resulting in a vicious cycle that increases both bone destruction and metastasis. Enhanced neutrophilic and granulocytic infiltration in lungs and bone of the pro-arthritic and arthritic mice and subsequent increase in circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), interleukin-17 (IL-17), interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) may contribute to the increased metastasis. Treatment with anti-IL17 + celecoxib, an anti-inflammatory drug completely abrogated the development of metastasis and significantly reduced the primary tumor burden. Conclusions The data clearly has important clinical implications for patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, especially with regards to the prognosis and treatment options. Introduction Metastasis is regulated not only by intrinsic genetic changes in malignant cells, but also by the microenvironment. Several studies have demonstrated that sites of chronic inflammation are often associated with the establishment and growth of various malignancies [1]. A common inflammatory condition in humans is autoimmune arthritis (AA) that causes inflammation and deformity of the joints. Other systemic effects associated with AA include increased cellular infiltration and inflammation of the lungs and blood vessels (vasculitis), and weakening of the bones (osteoporosis). Although AA and cancer are different diseases, some of the underlying processes that contribute to the disorders of the joints and connective tissue that characterize AA also affect cancer progression and metastasis. In addition, the immune system appears to play an overseer's role in both diseases as reviewed by Ziegler [2]. The most striking link between the two diseases came from a long-term community-based prospective study of the influence of inflammatory polyarthritis (IP) in cancer incidence and survival [3]. The authors reported that inflammatory arthritis increases the risk of dying from cancer (at least double the risk of the general population). Several studies have also reported statistically significant risk ratios between AA and various malignancies including breast, lung, hematopoietic, non-melanotic skin, kidney, and colon [4-6]. Despite this knowledge, which has been available for a decade, there has been minimal research linking arthritis with metastatic breast cancer. It has never been questioned if a site of chronic inflammation linked to AA creates a milieu that attracts tumor cells to home and grow in the inflamed site. The lungs and bones are frequent sites of breast cancer metastasis [7]. The preference of breast cancer cells to grow in the bone and lung is underscored by the fact that 65 to 75% of patients with advanced disease develop bone or lung metastasis [8]. Yet, it is not known why and how breast cancer cells prefer to colonize these organs. There are no methods to predict the risk of breast cancer-associated metastasis and current treatments have notable limitations. We hypothesize that chronic inflammatory milieu and osteoclastic bone resorption caused by AA and the lung inflammation associated with it may influence the recruitment, retention, and proliferation of tumor cells in the bone and lungs. In this study, we determined if chronic inflammation in the bones and lungs induced by AA contribute to increased breast cancer-associated bone and lung metastasis. We have used a recently established animal model of spontaneous autoimmune arthritis known as SKG mice. These mice are on the Balb/c background and carry a mutation of the gene encoding a SH2 domain of ZAP-70, a key signal transduction molecule in T cells, and spontaneously develop T cell-mediated chronic AA [9]. The mutation impairs positive and negative selection of T cells in the thymus, leading to thymic production of arthritogenic autoimmune CD4+ T cells. The mice succumb to symmetrical joint swelling beginning in the small joints of the digits and progressing to larger joints, accompanied by severe synovitis with formation of pannus invading and eroding adjacent cartilage and subchondral bone. Genetic deficiency of IL-6, IL-1, or TNF-α inhibit development of AA in SKG mice [10], similar to the effects of anticytokine therapy in human arthritis [11]. These clinical and immunopathological characteristics of AA in these mice make the strain a suitable model for testing our hypothesis. When these arthritic mice were induced to develop metastatic mammary gland tumors, a significant increase in lung and bone metastasis were observed compared with the non-arthritic mice. Furthermore, the severity of arthritis was amplified by factors associated with the metastatic compared with the non-metastatic tumor cells. We have identified some of the key pro-inflammatory factors that may partially contribute to the increased incidence of secondary metastasis. Overall, our data suggests a novel link between AA-induced inflammation and secondary metastasis associated with breast cancer. Materials and methods Mice SKG mice have been established from a closed breeding colony of Balb/c mice [9]. Two sets of SKG breeding pairs were purchased from CLEA International (Tokyo, Japan) and were maintained in our animal facility. All protocols were approved by the Mayo Clinic Internal Animal Care Review Committee. Induction of arthritis and tumor inoculation Two month old mice were given a single intraperitoneal (ip) injection of 2 mg zymosan A in 100 μl of 0.15 M sodium chloride (NaCl) per mouse [12] and joint swelling was macroscopically examined starting at 14-days post zymosan A treatment. Thirty days post zymosan A treatment, more than 95% of the mice develop polyarthritis in small and large joints. At this time, mice were injected with 1 × 106 (in 100 μl of PBS) syngeneic breast cancer cells (4T1: metastatic or TUBO: non-metastatic) in the mammary fat pad. Age-matched SKG mice without zymosan A were used as the pro-arthritic model, and Balb/c mice were used as the non-arthritic controls. As per Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee regulations, we sacrificed the mice when tumors in the mammary fat pad reached 10% of the body weight. All mice were injected with the same number of tumor cells. When tumors in one group of mice reached more than 10% of their body weight, all mice were sacrificed and analysis was conducted. In our study the timepoint at which the mice were analyzed for metastasis was four weeks after tumor inoculation. Zymosan A was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA (St Louis, MO, USA). A 1% solution of zymosan was made in 0.15 M NaCl, placed in a boiling water bath for one hour, centrifuged for 30 minutes at 4000 rpm and the residue suspended evenly in the 0.15 M NaCl to the desired concentration. It is established that the glucose polymer B-1,3-D-glucans (B-glucans), the main constituents of zymosan A, are responsible for the arthritogenic effect [12]. Scoring of joint swelling Joint swelling was monitored by inspection and scored as follows: 0 = no joint swelling; 0.1 = swelling of one finger joint; 0.5 = mild swelling of wrist or ankle; 1.0 = severe swelling of wrist or ankle. Scores for all fingers of forepaws and hindpaws, wrists and ankles were totalled for each mouse. This method is followed according to previously published protocol [9]. Cell culture The 4T1 mammary carcinoma cell line was purchased from The American Type Cell Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and the TUBO mammary carcinoma cell line was generously provided by Dr Joseph Lustgurten, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine. 4T1 and TUBO cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Glutamax-1 and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were maintained at log phase at 37°C with 5% carbon dioxide. 4T1 is a highly metastatic breast cancer cell line derived from a spontaneously arising BALB/c mammary tumor. TUBO is a cloned cell line established from a mammary carcinoma of the Her2-neu transgenic mice also on the Balb/c background. TUBO is considered to be a nonmetastatic cell line. Measurement of circulating cytokines The RayBio® Custom Mouse Cytokines Antibody Array kit was purchased from RayBiotech (Norcross, GA, USA) and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, after blocking with 1 × blocking buffer (provided by the manufacturer), membranes were incubated for 1.5 hours with the experimental serum (10-fold diluted with 1 × blocking buffer). The membranes were washed and incubated with biotin-conjugated antibodies for 1.5 hours. The membranes were washed again and incubated with streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase for two hours, washed, and developed using an enhanced chemiluminescent substrate for horseradish peroxidase. Chemiluminescence was detected using a EpiChemi3® Darkroom imaging system and LabWorks® densitometry software (both from UVP Bioimaging, Upland, CA, USA). Data was corrected for background signal and normalized to positive controls using RayBio® Analysis Tool software (UVP Bioimaging, Upland, CA, USA). Histology Lungs were formalin fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (pH 6.8 to 7.2) for a minimum of 24 hours. Paraffin-embedded blocks were prepared by the Histology Core at The Mayo Clinic and 4-micron thick sections were cut for H&E staining and for immuno-staining. To determine macrophage infiltration in the lungs, F4/80 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; CI:A3-1) antibody was used at 1:50 dilution and incubated overnight at 4°C followed by DAKO goat anti-rat secondary (1:100 dilution; Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA, USA). For neutrophil staining, the standard protocol provided by the Naphthol AS-D Chloroacetate Esterase, (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA; Cat: # 91C-1Kit) was used. We recognize that CAE also may stain for other myeloid cells such as mast cells and macrophages; however, neutrophils stain purple and have the typical morphology as shown in the magnified image. The kit used to stain neutrophils is most commonly used to detect neutrophils in tissue sections that have been paraffin embedded (as indicated in the kit fact sheet). Slides examined under light microscopy and pictures taken at 200× magnification. For bones, the fore limb and hind limb were dissected from the mice and immersed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (pH 6.8 to 7.2) overnight. For decalcification, Cal-Rite (Richard Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), a formic acid decalcification agent was used for about 72 hours followed by the conventional processing method. Masson trichome staining was used to determine levels of osteoclasts. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and pancytokeratin (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) antibodies were used at 1:50 and incubated overnight at 4°C followed by the DAKO anti-goat secondary (Dako North America; 1:100 dilution) for 45 minutes at room temperature for COX-2. For pancytokeratin staining, DAKO anti-mouse secondary (Dako North America) was used at 1:100 for 45 minutes at room temperature. 3, 3"–diaminobenzidine was used as the chromogen and hematoxylin was used as counterstain. Slides were examined under light microscopy and pictures taken at 200× magnification. Faxitron imaging The Faxitron is a 160-kVp x-ray machine that was adapted from an x-ray imaging unit through modifications to facilitate experimental irradiation and imaging. The Faxitron model CP160 (Faxitron X-Ray Corp., Wheeling, IL, USA) is a commercially available x-ray tube machine that is designed for animal irradiation [13]. The analysis was conducted by a Mayo Clinic radiologist and lately in Carolinas Medical Center within the Department of Orthopedic Surgery. Invasion assay with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid Mice were sacrificed by carbon dioxide inhalation, a tracheal cannula was inserted, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was collected by lavage of the lungs, three times with 1 ml of cold PBS. BAL cells were pelleted by centrifugation and the supernatant collected for tumor invasion assays. Invasion of 4T1 was tested using a standard trans-well matrigel assay [14]. The inserts (8.0 μM Falcon 353097) were coated with 5 μl of 7.6 μg/μl growth factor-reduced marigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) diluted 1:5 in serum free RPMI (SF) media. Thirty minutes post incubation at 37°C, 500 μl BAL in SF media was added into a 24-well plate. Complete RPMI media with 10% FCS was used as a positive control and SF media served as the negative control. In to 300 μl SF media, 5 × 104 4T1 cells were added on the matrigel coated insert. Fifteen hours post incubation at 37°C, non-invaded cells were harvested from the top of the insert. Inserts were inverted and stained with 30 μl of crystal violet (0.5% crystal violet/20% methanol) for 5 to 10 minutes, rinsed with d-H20 and left to dry. The membranes were cut and added to 200 μl 10% acetic acid solution in a 96-well plate, incubated for 10 minutes, removed and read on a spectrophotometer at 562 μM. The percentage (%) of cells invaded = (average reading of the sample/average reading of the control) × 100. Study design for the IL-17 treatment To test the efficacy of anti-IL-17 antibody treatment on breast cancer-associated metastasis, three month old SKG mice were injected with 1 × 106 (in 100 μl of PBS) 4T1 cells in the mammary fat pad. When the tumors were 0.2 g or more, three ip injections of 5 μg/ml of anti-IL17 antibody (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA; Cat#560268) once a week was administered. Celecoxib (20 mg/kg in 100 μl 10% DMSO) was gavaged starting at the same time as the IL-17 antibody but was given daily until sacrifice. One week after the last injection, mice were sacrificed. Untreated SKG mice challenged with 4T1 cells and the SKG challenged with 4T1 cells and injected with 5 μg/ml rat immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 control antibody (BD Pharmingen, Cat# 554682) in 100 μl PBS were used as controls. Experimental groups were: 1) SKG + 4T1 (celecoxib only); 2) SKG + 4T1(IL-17 only); 3) SKG + 4T1(IL-17+celecoxib); 4) SKG + 4T1 (control antibody + DMSO); and 5) SKG + 4T1 (no treatment). Statistical analysis Student's t-test was used for comparing the level of significance between the experimental groups. Correlation coefficient was determined using the JMP statistical discovery software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results Metastatic breast cancer cells may contribute to the severity of arthritis in the SKG mice In pathogen-free facilities, the SKG mice remain pro-arthritic with no macroscopic signs of joint swelling until treated with zymosan A (a yeast cell wall extract) [12]. Within 30 to 45 days of zymosan treatment, there is clearly macroscopic evidence of joint swelling in the fingers and in the fore and hind limbs (Figures (Figures1a1a
Histological examination of the bone sections clearly showed that compared with the non-tumor-bearing SKG and the TUBO tumor-bearing SKG mice, the 4T1 tumor-bearing SKG mice had severe inflammation with a high degree of cellular infiltration in the joints (Figures 1i, k Significant increase in lung metastasis in the arthritic versus non-arthritic mice Next, we questioned if the primary tumor burden was affected by the arthritic milieu in the SKG mice. In SKG mice, both 4T1 and TUBO primary tumor burden was significantly higher compared with the non-arthritic Balb/c mice (Figures (Figures2a2a
We observed a three-fold increase in the incidence of lung metastasis in the 4T1 tumor-bearing SKG and SKG + zymosan mice compared with the 4T1 tumor-bearing Balb/c mice (Figures (Figures3a3a
To investigate a mechanism of the increased lung metastasis, we first examined the lung histology from the various mice. It became apparently clear from the H&E staining that all lungs that developed metastasis were packed with inflammatory cellular infiltrates characterized by prominent neutrophilic and granulocytic cells and activated macrophages (Figure (Figure3n3n The next obvious question was whether the severity of lung metastasis follows the severity of arthritis. A representative lung and bone section from a 4T1 tumor-bearing SKG mouse is shown in Figures Figures3k3k To further demonstrate the chemotactic microenvironment in the lungs of arthritic versus non-arthritic mice, specific staining for neutrophils and macrophages was conducted. Data showed significantly increased levels of neutrophilic infiltration in the non-tumor-bearing SKG and SKG + zymosan lungs as compared with the Balb/c and Balb/c + zymosan lungs (Figures 4a, b, e
BAL fluid from arthritic mice is highly chemotactic for the 4T1 cells in vitro Although the data above does not prove, it certainly suggests that the increased cellular infiltration in the lungs of the arthritic mice versus the non-arthritic mice may be one of the underlying mechanisms for the increased rate of metastasis observed in the arthritic mice (Figure (Figure3j).3j Increased expression of pancytokeratin positive epithelial cells in the arthritic bones coupled with increased expression of COX-2 We speculate that the cellular infiltration in the lungs may have greatly facilitated the recruitment of breast cancer cells to the site (Figures (Figures33
Increased 4T1 bone lesions in the arthritic versus non-arthritic mice Bones from six to seven mice were analyzed by x-ray imaging for osteolytic lesions. Representative images are shown in Figures Figures5m5m M-CSF, IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α, and VegF may be the underlying factors responsible for the increased metastasis in the arthritic mice To determine the possible mechanism that drives the 4T1 cells to become more metastatic in the arthritic model, we evaluated the circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the sera of the arthritic versus the non-arthritic mice. A custom mouse cytokine array was designed to test the sera for the presence of 10 cytokines known to be associated with osteolysis as well as tumor growth and metastasis [19]. These included M-CSF, TNF-α, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), vascular endothelial growth factor (VegF), IL-17, MMP-2, IL-6, Insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II), IL-1β, and IL-4 (Figure (Figure6a).6a
Treatment with anti-IL17 treatment in combination with celecoxib prevents 4T1-associated metastasis in the SKG mice IL-17 was elevated in our model, and because it is an emerging therapeutic target for cancer metastasis and arthritis [20-26], we tested if neutralizing IL-17 will be an effective therapy against the development of secondary metastasis in our arthritic model. We elected to conduct treatment with an anti-IL-17 antibody either alone or in combination with celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, in the SKG mice with established 4T1 tumors. The rationale for using a specific COX-2 inhibitor was that these drugs including celecoxib were originally developed for treating arthritis but have now been shown to have significant anti-cancer properties [27,28]. Established 4T1 tumor burden was significantly reduced in mice treated with celecoxib (P < 0.05), α-IL-17 antibody (P < 0.01), or celecoxib + α-IL-17 antibody (P < 0.01) when compared with untreated or control antibody + vehicle (DMSO) treated mice (Figure (Figure6i).6i Discussion A significant increase in breast cancer-associated secondary metastasis to the lungs and bones were observed in the arthritic versus the non-arthritic mice (Figures (Figures33 Compared with the non-arthritic Balb/c mice, the lungs of the arthritic mice expresses high levels of cellular infiltrates mostly characterized by neutrophils and some macrophages even before any tumor challenge (Figures (Figures4h4h This is the first study that undoubtedly establishes a correlation between the pro-inflammatory cell recruitment in the lungs during AA and the homing of the circulating tumor cells in the inflamed lungs (Figures (Figures33 As in human AA, cytokines play an essential role in the development of arthritis in the SKG mice [9,30]. Several cytokines have been implicated in the mechanism of synovial cell activation and joint destruction in AA [31]. In our study, serum analysis of cytokine proteins revealed higher expression of M-CSF, IL-17, IL-6, TNF-α, and VegF in the arthritic mice only when challenged with 4T1 metastatic breast cancer cells (Figure (Figure6h).6h Inflammation is a critical hallmark of arthritis and tumor progression [2,45-47]. Many processes that occur during arthritis also occur during tumorigenesis. There is increased vascularity in both, and there are common cytokines and growth factors that are regulated in both. The microenvironment in the tumor and arthritis is largely orchestrated by inflammatory cells and growth factors [48,49]. Thus, it is not unlikely that the two diseases commonly co-exist in women. Our study begins to evaluate whether these two disease states molecularly interact and feed off each other. Data from these studies were further substantiated in our preliminary study using a spontaneous metastatic breast cancer model (mice expressing the polyoma middle T antigen driven by the MMTV promoter) [50] that develop collagen-induced arthritis [51]. Similar increases in bone and lung metastasis is noted in this model as well (unpublished data). These studies may have important clinical implications, especially in the prevention of secondary metastasis, in designing combination drug regimens, and as a diagnostic risk-assessment tool. Conclusions Our data provide clear evidence for the first time that breast cancer-associated secondary metastasis is significantly increased in pro-arthritic and arthritic conditions and that blocking the IL-17 and COX-2 pathway may significantly reduce the rate of metastasis. Abbreviations AA: autoimmune arthritis; BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage; COX: cyclo-oxygenase; FBS: fetal bovine serum; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; IFN: interferon; Ig: immunoglobulin; IGF: insulin-like growth factor; IL: interleukin; ip: intraperitoneal; M-CSF: macrophage colony stimulating factor; MMP: matrixmetalloproteinase; NaCl: sodium chloride; PBS: phosphate buffered saline; PGE2: prostaglandin E2; SF: serum free; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; VegF: vascular endothelial growth factor. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions LDR designed and carried out the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. LP and TT helped with the dissections and endpoints. JS helped with the collection of BAL and designing the in vitro invasion assay. HEG conducted and interpreted some of the bone-associated histology and x-ray imaging. PM is the principal investigator of the laboratory in which the research was performed and contributed to the interpretation of the data and writing of the manuscript. Authors' information Dr Pinku Mukherjee, PhD, Irwin Belk Distinguished Professor of Cancer Research, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC. Dr Mukherjee is a trained tumor immunologist and has been an Associate Professor at the Department of Immunology in Mayo School of Medicine prior to moving to UNCC in September 2008. Dr Mukherjee has worked on Breast Cancer for the past 20 years. Dr Lopamudra Das Roy, PhD, Postdoctoral research associate, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC. Dr Roy has received funding for her work in Breast Cancer Research from The US Department of Defense Breast Cancer Foundation Latha Pathangey, MSc, senior technologist, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Biochemistry/Molecular Biology, Scottsdale, AZ. Ms Pathangey has worked with Dr Mukherjee for the past five years at Mayo Clinic. Teresa Tinder, BSc, senior technologist, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC. Ms Tinder has worked with Dr Mukherjee for the past 10 years. Jorge L. Schettini, PhD, Research Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC. Dr Schettini is a trained immunologist and has been working with Dr Mukherjee for the past three years. Helen Gruber, PhD, Director, Biology Division, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC. Dr Gruber has over 25 years of experience in the area of bone pathology and osteoarthritis and bone metastasis. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr Ronald J. Marler, our pathologist at the Mayo Clinic for his guidance and immense support with interpretation of the histologic images; Drs Gendler, and Lee for their valuable advice; Dr Spencer Chivers, our radiologist at the Mayo Clinic for analyzing the Faxitron images; Leslie Dixon, and Karen Lacombe for histology; all personnel at the Mayo Clinic Animal Facility; Judy Bradley, Scott R. Dulla, Jennifer Crease, Mary Merill, and Theresa Lombari for their help. We are also grateful for help provided by Natalia Zinchenko from the Carolinas Medical Center for help with bone imaging and some bone immunohistochemistry. We are extremely grateful to Sandeep Roy for preparation of the figures. This work was funded by the Concept Award BCO63396 from the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program and by The Mayo Foundation. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Contrib Microbiol. 2006; 13():118-37.
[Contrib Microbiol. 2006]J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Jun 3; 90(11):802-3.
[J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Mar; 56(3):790-8.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 May 18; 160(21):3069-73.
[Ugeskr Laeger. 1998]Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Oct; 64(10):1421-6.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2005]Nature. 2005 Jul 28; 436(7050):518-24.
[Nature. 2005]Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Aug; 2(8):584-93.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]Nature. 2003 Nov 27; 426(6965):454-60.
[Nature. 2003]J Clin Invest. 2004 Aug; 114(4):582-8.
[J Clin Invest. 2004]Nature. 2003 May 15; 423(6937):356-61.
[Nature. 2003]Nature. 2003 Nov 27; 426(6965):454-60.
[Nature. 2003]J Exp Med. 2005 Mar 21; 201(6):949-60.
[J Exp Med. 2005]J Exp Med. 2005 Mar 21; 201(6):949-60.
[J Exp Med. 2005]Nature. 2003 Nov 27; 426(6965):454-60.
[Nature. 2003]Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(4):R37.
[Breast Cancer Res. 2006]J Exp Med. 2005 Mar 21; 201(6):949-60.
[J Exp Med. 2005]Cancer Lett. 2007 Oct 28; 256(2):137-65.
[Cancer Lett. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 3; 106(9):3372-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009]N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 15; 350(16):1655-64.
[N Engl J Med. 2004]N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 15; 350(16):1655-64.
[N Engl J Med. 2004]J Immunol. 2007 Jun 1; 178(11):6730-3.
[J Immunol. 2007]Arthritis Res Ther. 2005; 7(5):R1034-45.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2005]Semin Oncol. 2004 Apr; 31(2 Suppl 7):22-9.
[Semin Oncol. 2004]BMC Cancer. 2006 Jan 30; 6():27.
[BMC Cancer. 2006]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005 Apr; 288(4):C831-9.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005]N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 15; 350(16):1655-64.
[N Engl J Med. 2004]Nature. 2003 Nov 27; 426(6965):454-60.
[Nature. 2003]Int Rev Immunol. 2005 May-Aug; 24(3-4):211-26.
[Int Rev Immunol. 2005]Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Feb; 38(2):151-60.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1995]PLoS One. 2008; 3(10):e3405.
[PLoS One. 2008]Neoplasia. 2009 Feb; 11(2):136-44.
[Neoplasia. 2009]J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Jun 3; 90(11):802-3.
[J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998]Nature. 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):860-7.
[Nature. 2002]Cell. 2004 Sep 17; 118(6):671-4.
[Cell. 2004]Cancer Cell. 2005 Mar; 7(3):211-7.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Cancer Microenviron. 2008 Dec; 1(1):69-83.
[Cancer Microenviron. 2008]