|
|
Org Biomol Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 September 24. Published in final edited form as: Published online 2009 July 2. doi: 10.1039/b908713c. | PMCID: PMC2749955 NIHMSID: NIHMS141104 |
High-yielding syntheses of hydrophilic, conjugatable chlorins and bacteriochlorins †Jason R. McCarthy,1□ Jayeeta Bhaumik,1□ Nabyl Merbouh,2 and Ralph Weissleder1 1Center for Molecular Imaging Research and Center for Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St., Rm 5406, Charlestown, MA 02129,USA 2Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada Next-generation photodynamic therapy agents based upon the conjugation of multiple photosensitizers to a targeting backbone will allow for more efficacious light-based therapies. To this end, we have developed glucose-modified chlorins and bacteriochlorins featuring a reactive carboxylic acid linker for conjugation to targeting moities. The photosensitizers were synthesized in relatively high yields from meso-tetra(p-aminophenyl)porphyrin, and resulted in neutral, hydrophilic chromophores with superb absorption profiles in the far-red and near-infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. In addition, conjugation of these photosensitizers to a model nanoscaffold (crosslinked dextran-coated nanoparticles) demonstrated that the inclusion of hydrophilic sugar moieties increased the number of dyes that can be loaded while maintaining suspension stability. The described compounds are expected to be particularly useful in the synthesis of a number of targeted nanotherapeutic systems. Far-red and near infrared absorbing photosensitizers (PS) have been extensively investigated for use in photodynamic therapy. These second-generation PS are substantially improved versus their first-generation analogues, including the clinically utilized Photofrin®. 1,2 First-generation agents generally suffer from short wavelengths of absorption and prolonged photosensitivity when administered in vivo. Second-generation PS, based upon modified tetrapyrrolic macrocycles, possess significantly stronger absorption profiles at longer wavelengths, thus increasing their efficiency. Second-generation PS include porphyrinoids such as chlorins, bacteriochlorins, benzoporphyrin derivatives, and (na)phthalocyanines. 2,3While more efficient PS will allow for increased generation of cytotoxic singlet oxygen, the ability to localize these molecules to sites of interest is also necessary. 3 Such third-generation PS have been targeted by a variety of means, including antibodies, 4–7 peptides, 8 and nanoparticles. 9–14 One of the advantages of these targeted systems is that they can allow for the delivery of multiple PS per molecule of agent. Aside from delivery schemes where the PS is encapsulated within a matrix, such as a silica or polymeric nanoparticle, there are a number of requirements for the synthesis of targeted-PS, including 1) availability of a conjugatable handle, 2) hydrophilicity under physiological conditions, 3) retained singlet oxygen generation in the conjugated state and 4) excellent biocompatibility (i.e. absence of dark toxicity). From a chemistry perspective, the second requirement particularly important for the development of high-payload agents in order to prevent aggregation which has deleterious effects on singlet oxygen quantum yields. Non-polar porphyrin chromophores have been rendered more hydrophilic by attaching polyethylene glycol, 15,16 cationic substituents, 8,17–19, and anionic substituents, such as sulfonates. 17 One class of substituents that has been highly studied is carbohydrates. Glycosylated porphyrins are water soluble, yet maintain a neutral charge. 20 Sugar modified porphyrins can also be recognized by cell surface carbohydrate receptors expressed in malignant cancers, and thus enable a degree of targeting. Despite previous reports, there continues to be a need for simple, conjugatable glucose modified PS Herein, we detail the high yielding syntheses of hydrophilic, conjugatable, glucose modified meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) derivatives, including the corresponding chlorin and bacteriochlorin analogues, from meso-tetra(p-aminophenyl)porphyrin. Furthermore, we illustrate the increased loading potential of the hydrophilic PS on a representative dextran nanoparticle scaffold versus the corresponding hydrophobic derivative. In order to synthesize glucose modified porphyrin derivatives, it is important to start with high yielding materials. To this end, we chose meso-tetra( p-aminophenyl)porphyrin 1, which is readily obtained via the condensation reaction of nitrobenzaldehyde and pyrrole, followed by SnCl 2·2H 2O-mediated reduction of the nitro groups to the corresponding amines, as previously reported. 21 Concomitantly, glucuronic acid was acetylated to protect the secondary hydroxyl groups, and then reacted with oxalyl chloride to give the corresponding acid chloride. 22,23The sugar modified porphyrin was synthesized using a one pot, two step methodology at millimole scale (). To porphyrin 1 in tetrahydrofuran at 0°C was added triethylamine and 1.1 equivalents of methyl glutaryl chloride, in order to introduce a single protected carboxylic acid functionality. After 2 h, additional triethylamine was added with subsequent addition of the protected β-D-glucopyranuronoyl chloride, which was allowed to react for another hour. This second addition of base is required due to the innate acidity of the acid chlorides. In the absence of excess base, the porphyrin becomes protonated and precipitates from solution, thereby decreasing the yield of the desired product. The glucose-derivatized porphyrin 3 was purified by flash chromatography using a gradient from 2% to 4% methanol in methylene chloride. Importantly, all fractions not containing the product can be recovered and hydrolyzed back to the starting porphyrin 1 (see ESI for hydrolysis conditions), so this reaction methodology is essentially lossless. The identity of porphyrin 3 was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution electrospray mass spectrometry (HRMS). The 1H NMR illustrated the inclusion of the three sugar moieties and the methyl glutarate, with signals equivalent to 45 protons between 2.0 and 2.3 ppm corresponding to the sugar acetyl groups (36 H), and the methoxy (3 H) and methylene (6 H) protons of the methyl glutarate (see ESI for spectra). In addition, the protons of the hexose ring were observed with the expected couplings between 4.3 and 6.0 ppm. The expected peaks were also observed in the 13C NMR, including signals corresponding to the four amide and one ester carbonyl groups (164–175 ppm). This synthesis can also be accomplished stepwise, although the separation of the methyl glutaryl porphyrin 2 is rather difficult by flash chromatography, largely due to smearing caused by the presence of the amines which undergo protonation/deprotonation due to the acidity of the silica gel. Additionally, alternate protected acid moieties can be introduced, such as methyl 4-chloro-4-oxobutyrate, methyl adipoyl chloride, or glutaric acid monoethyl ester chloride. The use of succinic or glutaric anhydride could also be envisioned, but products bearing non-protected acids complicate the subsequent reactions due to the formation of side products, making the purifications difficult. Conversion of the porphyrin 3 to the corresponding chlorins and bacteriochlorins was effected by the osmium tetroxide-mediated dihydroxylation ( and , respectively). Reaction of 3 with 2 equivalents of OsO4 resulted in the formation of four osmate ester isomers; two sets of regioisomers (adjacent to and opposite the methyl glucaryl group), each of which consists of two stereoisomers. At this stage, the chlorins were separated by column chromatography into the respective regioisomers, as the stereoisomers are of identical polarity, and are thus inseparable by this method. The regioisomers were then treated with hydrogen sulfide to yield the vic-dihydroxychlorins 4I and 4II, which were further purified by column chromatography. As with the porphyrin, the presence of glucose and methyl glutaryl groups were observed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. In addition, signals corresponding to the hydroxyl protons (3.45 ppm) and 2,3-β hydrogens (6.26 ppm) were also observed. Hydrolysis of the sugar acetyl esters and glutaryl methyl ester of 4I and 4II with 0.3 M LiOH yields the conjugatable, hydrophilic chlorins 5I and 5II. These products were readily purified by HPLC and characterized by NMR and HRMS. Since it has proven difficult to fully resolve the identity of the isomers, they have been labeled with Roman numerals based upon their polarity, with the least polar labeled I and most polar labeled II. The 2,3,12,13-bis-(vic-dihydroxy)bacteriochlorins, 6, were synthesized as described above for the chlorins, except for the addition of a large excess of OsO4 due to the need to include two osmate esters per porphyrin. Reaction of 3 with 6 equivalents of OsO4 resulted in the formation of four isomers () which were separable by column chromatography into two components. Each purified mixture is expected to be comprised of two isomers, likely the co-facial or anti-facial isomers, respectively. The purified products were then treated with hydrogen sulfide to yield the bis-(vic-dihydroxy)bacteriochlorins 6I and 6II, which were further purified by column chromatography. The NMR spectra of the isomeric mixtures were highly similar. In fact, the similarity also extended to the spectra of 4I and 4II, since the chlorins and bacteriochlorins bear the same symmetry point group and aminophenyl modifications. The main differences were seen in the aromatic region, where the bacteriochlorins possess 2 fewer protons, and in the aliphatic region, where the additional β-protons and hydroxyl protons are present. Each of the acetyl protected bacteriochlorins was further treated with 0.3M LiOH solution in order to remove the acetyl protecting groups and at the same time to cleave of the ester group in the side chain, as described above for the chlorins. The crude deprotected bacteriochlorins were purified by C-18 reverse phase chromatography to afford sugar-modified bacteriochlorins 7I and 7II. When the UV-vis absorption spectra of the starting porphyrins were examined (), a large increase in extinction coefficient (10-fold) and hypsochromic shift (10 nm) of the Soret band was observed upon conjugation of the methyl glutaryl chloride and the protected sugar moieties to meso-tetra( p-aminophenyl)porphyrin 1. Interestingly, the extinction coefficient of 1 is also significantly lower than TPP, illustrating the effect the presence of amine moieties have on the photophysics of the chromophore, although they do not directly partake in its conjugation. Amide bond formation, on the other hand, seems to negate the presence of the amines and enhances its absorption profile. Conversion of porphyrin 3 to chlorins 4I and 4II results in the expected broadening of the Soret band, and an increase in the extinction coefficient of the farthest red side band (~ 3-fold versus the porphyrin). Deprotection of 4I and 4II unfortunately yields chlorins with decreased extinction coefficients in DMF, likely due to differences in solubility and solvation. Conversion of the porphyrin to bacteriochlorins 6I and 6II results in a significantly altered absorption spectra, as demonstrated previously. 24 The main advantage of bacteriochlorins is that the longest wavelength absorption is shifted to 713 nm, 65 nm further red than the respective chlorins, with comparable extinction coefficients. At longer wavelengths, light is able to penetrate deeper into tissues, maximizing the therapeutic potential of light activated therapies. 25Conjugation to nanoparticles In order to demonstrate the advantage of the sugar-modified chlorins in the conjugation to targeting and delivery platforms, we modified crosslinked dextran-coated nanoparticles with chlorin 5I. The conjugation efficiency of our chlorin was compared to that of chlorin e 6, which is commercially available and has been commonly used in a number of PDT applications. 26–28 Twenty four to 138 PS were appended to the particle surface via 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC)-mediated amide bond formation. At all PS loadings, the particles modified with 5I remained in suspension, with almost quantitative recovery of the products. In contrast, at higher loadings of chlorin e 6 (101 and 87 PS), 50% of the particles flocculated and settled out of suspension within 16 h. At 48 h after purification, all chlorin e 6-modified particles demonstrated some degree of precipitation, with the highest loadings completely absent from suspension. In contrast, all nanoagents synthesized with the sugar-modified chlorins were stable for more than one month, with no observed flocculation. While efficient PS conjugation is important, so are the excited state processes of the conjugated chlorins, including singlet oxygen generation and fluorescence emission. In order to determine this efficiency, the relative fluorescence quantum yield of the chromophore at each nanoparticle loading was determined. As compared to the free glucose-modified chlorin 5I, the comparative fluorescence quantum yield of the conjugates was approximately 25%, regardless of the number conjugated. Alternately, the chlorin e6 conjugates displayed only 5% of the fluorescence quantum yield of the free PS, also regardless of the number of chlorins per particle. This decrease in fluorescence may be attributed to a number of factors, including the aforementioned dye-dye interactions, as well as a difference in local environment between the free dye and the conjugate. An additional confounding factor is the light scattering that may be introduced by the nanoparticles, further decreasing the observed quantum yields. We have demonstrated the syntheses of hydrophilic, conjugatable chlorins and bacteriochlorins based upon the modification of meso-tetra(p-aminophenyl)porphyrin. These PS bear glucose moieties in order to increase the polarity of the relatively hydrophobic porphyrin, while also maintaining a neutral overall charge. In addition, a carboxylic acid functionalized linker is also appended to the macrocycle in order to allow for facile conjugation to biomolecules and nanoagents. Conjugation of the chlorins to a model nanoscaffold illustrated that the PS do not exhibit appreciable differences in excited state quenching at any loading while simultaneously demonstrating excellent suspension stability, as compared to chlorin e6. Thus, we believe that these PS are expected to be useful in the synthesis of the next generation of targeted nanoagents for the therapy and treatment of a number of diseases, including cancer and atherosclerosis. General All chemicals and solvents were purchased from Fisher or Sigma Aldrich and used as received without further purification. Silica gel (Sorbent Technologies, 60 Å, 40–63 μm, 230 × 400 mesh) was used for column chromatography. UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 50 UV-vis spectrophotometer. Fluorescence data were collected from a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer. Absorption and fluorescence spectra were collected in DMF at room temperature unless noted otherwise. LCMS data were collected form a Water 2695 HPLC equipped with a 2996 diode array detector, a Micromass ZQ4000 ESI-MS module, and a Grace-Vydac RPC18 column (model 218TP5210) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Gradients were run with buffer A (H 2O/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)) and buffer B (90% acetonitrile/10% H 2O/0.1% TFA). For analytical HPLC a C-18 reverse phase column (Varian) was used with dimensions of 250 mm × 4.6 mm. For semi-preparative HPLC a C-18 reverse phase column (Varian) was used with dimensions of 250 mm × 21.2 mm. High-resolution eletrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectra were obtained from a Bruker Daltonics APEXIV 4.7 T Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance spectrometer (FT-ICR-MS) in the Department of Chemistry Instrumentation Facility (DCIF) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz) and 13C NMR spectra (125 MHz) were collected in the solvents noted. Porphyrin 121 and β-D-glucopyranuronoyl chloride 22,23 were synthesized as described previously. Iron oxide nanoparticles were obtained from the chemistry core at the Center for Molecular Imaging Research. 5,10,15-Tris(4-1′,2′,3′,4′-O-acetyl-glucopyranuron-N-phenylamide)-20-[4-(5'- methoxy-1',5'-dioxopentyl)aminophenyl]porphyrin, 3 To 1.04 g porphyrin 1 (1.54 × 10−3 mol) in tetrahydrofuran (300 mL) at 0°C was added triethylamine (Et3N, 5 equiv, 1.08 mL), and methyl glutaryl chloride (1.1 equiv, 233 μL). The reaction was allowed to proceed at 0°C for 2 h, at which time an additional 5 equiv Et3N was added (1.08 mL). To this solution was then added β-D-glucopyranuronoyl chloride (4 equiv, 2.34 g), and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature over the course of 1 h. The reaction mixture was then concentrated to approximately 50 mL and then diluted with CH2Cl2 (100 mL). The solution was washed once with water, once with saturated aq NaHCO3, and once with water again. The organic layer was subsequently dried over anhydr MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness. The product was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH, gradient from 98:2 to 96:4). All fractions containing the product were combined and evaporated to dryness, redissolved in CH2Cl2, and precipitated with hexanes to give the product in 33% recovered yield (0.92 g). UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 424 (5.90), 519 (4.44), 556 (4.36), 595 (3.99), 648 (4.09) nm; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ) −2.84 (s, 2H), 2.08–2.28 (m, 41H), 2.57 (m, 4H), 4.38 (d, 3H, J = 9.5), 5.26 (t, 3H, J = 8.0), 5.44 (t, 3H, J = 9.0), 5.50 (t, 3H, J = 9.5), 5.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.0), 7.87 (br m, 8H), 8.14 (br m, 9H), 8.31 (s, 3H), 8.82 (br m, 8H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ) 20.7, 20.7, 20.8, 21.0, 21.0, 33.0, 33.1, 36.8, 51.9, 69.1, 70.6, 72.1, 73.6, 91.8, 118.0, 118.8, 135.2, 136.4, 139.0, 164.4, 169.0, 169.1, 169.4, 169.9, 170.0, 174.1 ppm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1837.2 (MH+), 919.0 (MH2+); HR-MS (ESI of MH+, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C92H91N8O33: 1836.5761, found: 1836.5729; HPLC tR = 11.40 min (using a gradient of 60% to 0% of buffer A over 25 min). General synthesis of 2,3-vic-dihydroxy-5,10,15-Tris(4-1′,2′,3′,4′-O-acetyl-glucopyranuron-N-phenylamide)-20-[4-(5'-methoxy-1',5'-dioxopentyl) aminophenyl]chlorins, 4I and 4IIt To a stirring solution of 3 (~ 0.8 g) in CHCl3/pyridine (4:1, 150 mL) was added OsO4 (2.0 equiv.). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 48 hours, at which time it was evaporated to dryness. The two isomers of the osmate ester were separated by flash chromotography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4), with fractions containing the respective isomers combined and evaporated to dryness. Each isomer was then dissolved in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and H2S was bubbled through the solution for 5 min. The reaction mixtures were stoppered and reacted for 45 min, at which time they were blown dry with a stream of nitrogen. The crude products were then dissolved in CH2Cl2 and passed through celite to remove any residual solids, and were again evaporated to dryness. The final products were obtained by flash chromotography using the solvent systems detailed below. Alternately, the reaction can be monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy in order to determine the extent of reaction, allowing for the adjustment of reaction time. 4I Flash chromatography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH, gradient from 97.5:2.5 to 95:5). Fractions containing the product were combined and evaporated to dryness, dissolved in a minimal volume of CH2Cl2 and precipitated with petroleum ether to give chlorin 4I in 8% yield (0.07 g). UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 424 (5.52), 523 (4.36), 552 (4.42), 597 (4.08), 648 (4.51) nm; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ) −1.87 (s, 2H), 2.12–2.24 (br m, 41H), 2.57 (br, 4H), 3.4 (br, 2H), 4.42 (br m, 3H), 5.23 (br m, 3H), 5.49 (br m, 6H), 5.96 (br m, 3H), 6.25 (br 2H), 7.90 (br m, 17 H), 8.39 (br m, 11 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ) 20.5, 20.6, 20.7, 20.8, 20.8, 33.0, 51.7, 68.8, 70.3, 71.9, 73.5, 91.6, 112.4, 117.9, 119.3, 119.8, 124.1, 127.9, 132.5, 134.4, 136.1, 140.6, 164.2, 164.3, 169.0, 169.3, 169.6, 169.7, 169.9, 170.0, 173.9 ppm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1871.2 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI of MH+, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C92H93N8O35: 1870.5816, found: 1870.5810; HPLC tR = 12.52 min (using a gradient of 60% to 0% of buffer A over 25 min). 4II Flash chromatography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4). Fractions containing the product were combined and evaporated to dryness, dissolved in a minimal volume of CH2Cl2 and precipitated with petroleum ether to give chlorin 4II in 12% yield (0.10 g). UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 424 (5.41), 523 (4.28), 552 (4.34), 597 (4.02), 648 (4.45) nm; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ) −1.90 (s, 2H), 2.15 (m, 41H), 2.54 (s, 4H), 2.96 (br s, 2H), 4.42 (m, 3H), 5.30 (m, 3H), 4.59 (m, 6H), 5.96 (m, 3H), 6.30 (br s, 2H), 7.87 (br, 17H), 8.45 (m, 11H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ) 20.6, 20.8, 33.0, 36.5, 51.7, 68.9, 70.4, 71.9, 73.6, 91.7, 118.8, 122.2, 124.3, 128.0, 132.6, 134.4, 135.5, 136.2, 137.8, 140.7, 152.9, 161.5, 164.4, 169.0, 169.3, 169.7, 169.9, 170.8, 173.9 ppm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1871.3 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI of MH+, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C92H93N8O35: 1870.5816 found: 1870.5889; HPLC tR = 12.61 min (using a gradient of 60% to 0% of buffer A over 25 min). Deprotection of chlorins 4I and 4II A sample of 4I or 4II (~20 mg) in THF/MeOH (1:1, 3 mL) was cooled to 0 °C. A cold solution of LiOH in water (1.5 mL, 0.8 M) was then slowly added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C. The reaction was monitored by HPLC. Upon complete hydrolysis of the protecting groups (~2 h) the reaction mixture was poured into 30 mL cold water. The pH of the resulting solution was raised to 4 by slow addition of cold 0.1 M HCl. The resulting mixture was purified by reverse phase column chromatography (C18 cartridge, eluted with a gradient of 100 to 0 of buffer A) followed by preparative HPLC (using a gradient of 100 to 0 of buffer A, flow rate = 21 mL/min). The fractions containing the desired product were combined and evaporated to dryness affording a green solid: 5I Yield 10 mg, 73%; UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 424 (5.18), 522 (3.94), 552 (3.99), 595 (3.68), 647 (4.04) nm; UV-vis (PBS) λmax (log ε): 406 (4.65), 526 (3.49), 556 (3.54), 597 (3.33), 649 (3.59) nm.;+ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1351 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI of MH+, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C67H66N8O23: 1351.4314, found: 1351.4371; HPLC tR = 9.61 min (using a gradient of 100% to 0% of buffer A over 20 min). 5II Yield 11 mg, 80%; UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 424 (5.07), 522 (3.86), 552 (3.92), 595 (3.64), 647 (4.00) nm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1351 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI of MH+, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C67H66N8O23: 1351.4314, found: 1351.4328; HPLC tR = 9.57 min (using a gradient of 100% to 0% of buffer A over 20 min). General synthesis of 2,3,12,13-bis(-vic-dihydroxy)-5,10,15-Tris(4-1′,2′,3′,4′-O-acetyl-glucopyranuron-N-phenylamide)-20-[4-(5'-methoxy-1',5'-dioxopentyl) aminophenyl]bacteriochlorins, 6I and 6II To a stirring solution of porphyrin 3 (0.30 g, 0.16 mmol) in anhydrous CHCl3/pyridine (4:1, 50 mL) was added a solution of OsO4 (0.25 g, 6.0 equiv., in 2.5 mL CHCl3/pyridine). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 4 days, at which time it was evaporated to dryness. The bacteriochlorin osmate ester was purified by flash chromotography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4 to 95:5), with fractions containing each of the isomers combined and evaporated to dryness. Each isomer was then dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) and H2S was bubbled through the solution for 5 min. The reaction mixture was stoppered and reacted for 45 min, at which time it was blown dry with a stream of nitrogen. The crude product was then dissolved in CH2Cl2/MeOH, (50:1 to 25:1) and passed through celite to remove any residual solids, and was again evaporated to dryness. The final products were obtained by flash chromotography using the solvent systems detailed below. Alternately, the reaction can be monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy in order to determine the extent of reaction, allowing for the adjustment of reaction time. 6I Flash chromotography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH, gradient from 97.5:2.5 to 92:8). Fractions containing the product were combined and evaporated to dryness affording a pink solid in 10% yield (30 mg). UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 382 (4.93), 533 (4.30), 713 (4.52) nm; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2/CD3OD 9:1, δ) 2.18 (m, 42H), 2.50 (m, 4H), 3.60 (br, 2H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 4.37 (d, J = 9.0, 3H), 5.24 (t, J = 8.0, 3H), 5.43 (m, 6H), 5.91 (m, 3H), 6.00 (m, 3H), 7.70 (br, 12H), 7.94 (br, 4H), 8.14 (m, 4H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2, δ) 20.9, 20.9, 21.0, 21.1, 21.4, 33.6, 36.7, 51.4, 69.5, 70.6, 72.4, 73.5, 74.2, 92.1, 115.9, 123.7, 132.7, 136.4, 137.6, 138.8, 159.4, 165.2, 169.8, 169.9, 170.3, 170.5, 174.5 ppm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1903 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI of MH++Na, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C92H95N8O37Na: 1926.5696, found: 1926.5702; HPLC tR = 14.12 min (using a gradient of 60% to 0% of buffer A over 25 min). 6II Flash chromotography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH, gradient from 95:5 to 90:10). Fractions containing the product were combined and evaporated to dryness affording a pink solid in 18% yield (55 mg). UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 381 (4.96), 535 (4.31), 714 (4.55) nm; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2/CD3OD 9:1, δ) 2.10 (m, 50H), 2.51 (m, 5H), 3.53 (m, 2H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 4.37 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 5.23 (m, 3H), 5.43 (m, 6H), 5.90 (m, 3H). 6.11 (br, 4H), 7.78 (br m, 14H), 8.10 (br, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2, δ) 17.7, 20.9, 26.4, 31.4, 33.6, 36.6, 52.1, 92.2, 115.9, 120.2, 123.8, 132.7, 135.1, 136.5, 137.5, 138.9, 159.7, 165.3, 170.0, 170.4, 170.6, 174.7 ppm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1903 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI of MH++Na, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C92H95N8O37Na: 1926.5696, found: 1926.5696; HPLC tR = 15.52 min (using a gradient of 100% to 0% of buffer A over 20 min). Deprotection of bacteriochlorins 6I and 6II A sample of 6 (~ 10 mg) in THF/MeOH (1:1, 2 mL) was cooled to 0 °C. A cold solution of LiOH in water (1 mL, 0.6 M) was then slowly added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C. The reaction was monitored by HPLC analysis. Upon complete hydrolysis of all the protecting groups (~2 h) the organic solvents (THF and MeOH) were removed. The resulting solution was diluted with water and poured into a reversephase column (C18 cartridge). The solid residue was washed with plenty of water to remove all inorganic salts. The residue was then eluted with MeOH affording the deprotected bacteriochlorin as a pink solid . 7I Yield 9 mg, 93%; UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 384 (4.3), 540 (3.8), 715 (4.0) nm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1385.5 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI- of [M-H]−, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C67H67N8O25: 1383.4217, found: 1383.4209; HPLC tR = 9.97 min (using a gradient of 100% to 0% of buffer A over 20 min). 7II Yield 6 mg, 87%; UV-vis (DMF) λmax (log ε): 383 (4.5), 537 (3.8), 714 (4.1) nm; +ESI-MS (30 V, CH3CN/ 0.1% TFA) m/z = 1385.3 (MH+); HR-MS (ESI- of [M-H]−, CH3CN): m/z calc'd for C67H67N8O25: 1383.4217, found: 1383.4219; HPLC tR = 10.08 min (using a gradient of 100% to 0% of buffer A over 20 min) Conjugation to crosslinked dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles Stock solutions of chlorin 5I (2.6 mg, 52 μL) and chlorin e6 (3.5 mg, 70 μL) were made up in DMSO. To 1 mg crosslinked dextran coated iron oxide nanoparticles in phosphate buffered saline (12.12 mg Fe/mL) was added varying amount of chlorin (1 mg to 0.05 mg) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) (1 mg). The solutions were allowed to react for 16 h, at which time they were purified by filtration through Sephadex G-25. The volumes of the resulting solutions were measured. The concentration of the particles in suspension was calculated from the OD of the iron at 300 nm, as compared to the starting suspension. The amount of chlorin conjugated was calculated using the extinction coefficient and the OD of the farthest red side band. Assuming 8000 Fe per particle, the molecular weight of the iron in each particle is 446400 amu. The number of chlorins per particle is thus calculated from this. The extinction coefficient of chlorin e6 in water is 25000 L mol−1 cm−11 at 660 nm. Relative fluorescence quantum yields The determination of relative fluorescence quantum yields were performed as described previously. 29| Graphical Contents Entry Hydrophilic, conjugatable glucose-modified chlorins and bacteriochlorins can be synthesized in high overall yields. These photosensitizers can be appended to nanomaterials in increased numbers, resulting in superbly stable suspensions. |
This work was supported by an NIH grant U24-CA092782 (RW), U01-HL080731 (JM, RW), NIH grants U54-CA119349 (RW), U54-CA126515 (RW). Special thanks to Dr. Martha Morton for expertise and assistance with acquisition of NMR spectra. (1). Brown SB, Brown EA, Walker I. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5:497. [PubMed] (2). MacDonald IJ, Dougherty TJ. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines. 2001;5:105. (3). Josefsen LB, Boyle RW. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008;154:1. [PubMed] (4). Bisland SK, Singh D, Gariepy J. Bioconjug Chem. 1999;10:982. [PubMed] (5). Chaloin L, Bigey P, Loup C, Marin M, Galeotti N, Piechaczyk M, Heitz F, Meunier B. Bioconjug Chem. 2001;12:691. [PubMed] (6). Del Governatore M, Hamblin MR, Shea CR, Rizvi I, Molpus KG, Tanabe KK, Hasan T. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4200. [PubMed] (7). Hudson R, Carcenac M, Smith K, Madden L, Clarke OJ, Pelegrin A, Greenman J, Boyle RW. Br. J. Cancer. 2005;92:1442. [PubMed] (8). Choi Y, McCarthy JR, Weissleder R, Tung CH. ChemMedChem. 2006;1:458. [PubMed] (9). Konan YN, Berton M, Gurny R, Allemann E. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2003;18:241. [PubMed] (10). Konan YN, Cerny R, Favet J, Berton M, Gurny R, Allemann E. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;55:115. [PubMed] (11). Konan YN, Chevallier J, Gurny R, Allemann E. Photochem. Photobiol. 2003;77:638. [PubMed] (12). McCarthy JR, Jaffer FA, Weissleder R. Small. 2006;2:983. [PubMed] (13). McCarthy JR, Perez JM, Bruckner C, Weissleder R. Nano Lett. 2005;5:2552. [PubMed] (14). Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Pudavar HE, Bergey EJ, Oseroff AR, Morgan J, Dougherty TJ, Prasad PN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:7860. [PubMed] (15). Regehly M, Greish K, Rancan F, Maeda H, Bohm F, Roder B. Bioconjug Chem. 2007;18:494. [PubMed] (16). Reuther T, Kubler AC, Zillmann U, Flechtenmacher C, Sinn H. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29:314. [PubMed] (17). Balaz M, Collins HA, Dahlstedt E, Anderson HL. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:874. [PubMed] (18). Mroz P, Bhaumik J, Dogutan DK, Aly Z, Kamal Z, Khalid L, Kee HL, Bocian DF, Holten D, Lindsey JS, Hamblin MR. Cancer Lett. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.02.054. (19). Ruzie C, Krayer M, Balasubramanian T, Lindsey JS. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:5806. [PubMed] (20). Zheng X, Pandey RK. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2008;8:241. [PubMed] (21). Yuasa M, Oyaizu K, Yamaguchi A, Kuwakado M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:11128. [PubMed] (22). Tosin M, Murphy PV. Org Lett. 2002;4:3675. [PubMed] (23). Tosin M, Murphy PV. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:4107. [PubMed] (24). Brückner C, Dolphin D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:9425. (25). Weissleder R, Ntziachristos V. Nat Med. 2003;9:123. [PubMed] (26). Chin WW, Heng PW, Thong PS, Bhuvaneswari R, Hirt W, Kuenzel S, Soo KC, Olivo M. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69:1083. [PubMed] (27). Chin WW, Heng PW, Lim PL, Lau WK, Olivo M. J Biophotonics. 2008;1:395. [PubMed] (28). Ferreira CS, Cheung MC, Missailidis S, Bisland S, Gariepy J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:866. [PubMed] (29). McCarthy JR, Weissleder R. ChemMedChem. 2007;2:360. [PubMed]
|
The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at 
