• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Clin Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC Sep 15, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2747034
NIHMSID: NIHMS140297

The multifaceted role of MTDH/AEG-1 in cancer progression

Abstract

Cancer is the result of the progressive acquisition of multiple malignant traits through the accumulation of genetic or epigenetic alterations. Recent studies have established a functional role of MTDH (Metadherin)/AEG-1 (Astrocyte Elevated Gene 1) in several crucial aspects of tumor progression, including transformation, evasion of apoptosis, invasion, metastasis and chemoresistance. Overexpression of MTDH/AEG-1 is frequently observed in melanoma, glioma, neuroblastoma, and carcinomas of breast, prostate, liver and esophagus and is correlated with poor clinical outcomes. MTDH/AEG-1 functions as a downstream mediator of the transforming activity of oncogenic Ha-Ras and c-Myc. Furthermore, MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression activates the PI3K/Akt, NFκB, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways to stimulate proliferation, invasion, cell survival and chemoresistance. The lung-homing domain of MTDH/AEG-1 also mediates the adhesion of tumor cells to the vasculature of distant organs and promotes metastasis. These findings suggest that therapeutic targeting of MTDH/AEG-1 may simultaneously suppress tumor growth, block metastasis and enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic treatments.

Background

Cancer progression is driven by the accumulation of numerous genetic and epigenetic alterations that promote tumor initiation, expansion and metastasis (1-3). In the past few decades, massive efforts in cancer research have led to the identification of a seemingly exhaustive list of oncogenes, tumor suppressors and signal pathways that are potential targets for anti-cancer therapeutics. Metadherin (MTDH, also known as AEG-1, and Lyric), a novel gene that was cloned only five years ago, has emerged in recent years as a potentially crucial mediator of tumor malignancy and a key converging point of a complex network of oncogenic signaling pathways (4, 5).

Cloning and molecular characteristics

MTDH/AEG-1 was originally reported as a novel late response gene induced in human fetal astrocytes after HIV-1 infection or treatment with viral glycoprotein gp120 or TNF-α (6). Full-length MTDH/AEG-1 cDNA was subsequently cloned by four independent groups (7-10). Brown et al. used a phage display screen to identify a lung homing peptide in MTDH that allowed the specific adhesion of mouse 4T1 mammary tumor cells to lung vascular endothelium (8). The mouse/rat orthologue of MTDH/AEG-1 was also found to encode the lysine-rich CEACAM-1 co-isolated protein (Lyric) that co-localizes with the tight junction protein ZO-1 in polarized rat prostate epithelial cells (9), and as a novel transmembrane protein that is present in cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, perinuclear regions and nucleolus (10).

MTDH/AEG-1 orthologues were found in most vertebrate species but not in non-vertebrates. Although evolutionally highly conserved, MTDH/AEG-1 does not have any recognizable protein domains except three putative lysine-rich nuclear localization signals (NLSs). Human MTDH/AEG-1 encodes a 582 amino acid protein with a calculated molecular mass of 64 kDa. MTDH/AEG-1 is expressed in variable levels in most tissues. Antibodies against MTDH/AEG-1 often detect multiple proteins with molecular weights ranging from 75-80 kDa to 20 kDa, possibly due to alternative splicing and/or posttranslational modification (7-10). MTDH/AEG1 is rich in both lysine (12.3%) and serine (11.6%) residues that are targets for post-translational modifications such as acetylation and ubiquitination of lysines (11) and phosphorylation of serine and threonine. How posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications of MTDH/AEG-1 influence its function and localization is currently unknown.

Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical analysis MTDH/AEG-1 often showed perinuclear and cytoplasmic staining as well as some nuclear rim, nucleolar and general nuclear diffuse staining in various cell types (4, 7, 9, 10). Cytoplasmic membrane localization of MTDH/AEG-1 has also been detected by immunostaining of non-permeablized mouse 4T1 mammary tumor cells and by FACS (8). TNF-α treatment, which up-regulates MTDH/AEG-1 expression, as well as ectopic overexpression of MTDH/AEG-1, has been shown to enhance nuclear localization of MTDH/AEG-1 in HeLa cells (12). Nuclear localization of MTDH/AEG-1 is probably mediated by three putative lysine-rich NLS sequences, although the exact mechanism and functional significance of MTDH/AEG-1 nuclear and nucleolar translocation is still under investigation (11, 12). Several independent protein motif analysis methods predict a single transmembrane domain (amino acids 52-74) in MTDH/AEG-1. However, there is still considerable debate regarding whether MTDH/AEG-1 is a type Ib membrane protein (C-terminal in the cytoplasmic side with no signal peptide), or a type II protein (C-terminal outside) based on computational modeling (7, 9) and experiment evidence (8, 9). Although a considerable amount of work is still required to fully characterize the molecular and biochemical properties of MTDH/AEG-1, functional and clinical evidence accumulated in recent years strongly support an important role for MTDH/AEG-1 in cancer development.

Integration of oncogenic pathways

MTDH/AEG-1 contributes to several hallmarks of metastatic cancers, including aberrant proliferation, survival under stressful conditions such as serum deprivation and chemotherapy, and increased migration, invasiveness and metastasis. Overexpression of MTDH/AEG-1 synergizes with oncogenic Ha-Ras to enhance soft-agar colony formation of immortalized melanocyte and astrocyte (7). Conversely, MTDH/AEG-1 was activated at the transcription level upon transient or stable transfection of oncogenic Ras in human fetal astrocytes (13) and MTDH/AEG-1 knockdown suppressed Ras-induced colony formation (13). Ras plays an essential role in regulating cell growth, survival, stress response, cytoskeleton reorganization and migration by activating a number of downstream signaling pathways, including the Raf/MAPK pathway (cell proliferation), the PI3K-Akt pathway (cell survival), the Rac-Rho pathway (cytoskeletal reorganization) and the Rac-JNK/p38 pathways (stress response) (14-18). When inhibitors for various Ras downstream signaling pathways were tested, only PI3K/Akt inhibitors LY294002 and PTEN were able to block the MTDH/AEG-1 promoter activation by Ras, suggesting the involvement of PI3K/Akt pathway in MTDH/AEG-1 regulation (13). Promoter mapping subsequently identified two E-boxes (binding sites for c-Myc) in the -356 to -302 region of the MTDH/AEG-1 promoter that is essential for activation by Ras (13). Linking the Akt activation to c-Myc regulation of MTDH/AEG-1 is the phosphorylation and inactivation of GSK3β, a serine-threonine kinase that phosphorylates and destabilizes c-Myc (13, 19, 20). Collectively, these data link Ras activation of MTDH/AEG-1 through PI3K-Akt-GSK3β-Myc signaling (Fig. 1) in transformed astrocytes.

Fig. 1
MTDH/AEG-1 promotes tumor progression through the integration of multiple signaling pathways. Oncogenic Ha-Ras increases MTDH/AEG-1 expression through the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, which phosphorylates and inactivates GSK3β, and subsequently ...

Depending on the cell types tested, overexpression of MTDH/AEG-1 can activate several downstream pathways, including the Akt pathway, the NFκB pathway, and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, to enhance different aspects of tumor malignancy. MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression inhibits serum starvation-induced apoptosis in normal astrocytes and fibroblasts, but not in Ras-transformed cells (21). When a panel of pathway-specific inhibitors were used to probe the downstream mediator for the pro-survival function of MTDH/AEG-1, only the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, PTEN and dominant negative Akt were able to attenuate MTDH/AEG-1-dependent survival under serum-deprived conditions (21). MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression increases phosphorylation of Akt and GSK3β, with subsequent c-Myc stabilization and MDM2 phosphorylation, decrease of p53 and CDK inhibitor p21CIP1, as well as phosphorylation of Bad, a proapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family in astrocytes (21). These results indicate that MTDH/AEG-1-dependent cell growth and survival is mediated by Akt signaling downstream of PI3K (21). Thus, MTDH/AEG-1 is both a downstream target of Akt and an upstream activator of the PI3K-Akt pathway, although the mechanism of PI3K pathway activation by MTDH/AEG-1 remains unknown (Fig. 1).

Through the activation of Akt, MTDH/AEG-1 may affect a number of additional Akt downstream factors that are crucial for cellular proliferation and survival. MTDH/AEG-1 knockdown induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells through the reduction of Akt activity and upregulation of FOXO3a activity (22). FOXO3a is a pro-apoptosis forkhead transcription factor that is exported from the nucleus following phosphorylation by Akt (19, 23). The activator protein 1 (AP-1) and NFκB, two other transcription regulators downstream of the PI3K/Akt pathway, are also regulated by MTDH/AEG-1 expression (12, 22). MTDH/AEG-1 enhances nuclear accumulation, DNA binding and transcriptional activities of NFκB in Hela cells (12). The NFκB heterodimer p50 and p65 function as transcriptional factors to regulate a variety of cellular phenotypes including apoptosis, inflammation, immune response and oncogenic proliferation (24-26). NFκB can be activated by MTDH/AEG-1 through PI3K/Akt, which activates the IKK kinase to phosphorylate and destabilize the NFκB inhibitor IκB. Alternatively, MTDH/AEG-1 has been found to physically interact with the NFκB subunit p65 directly and promote its translocation to the nucleus (12). Furthermore, MTDH/AEG-1 may bridge the interaction between p65 and CBP, a ubiquitous transcriptional co-activator of NFκB in giloma cells (12, 27) (Fig. 1). In Hela cells, ectopic overexpression of MTDH/AEG-1 resulted in up-regulation of several NFκB -responsive cell adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-2 and ICAM-3, selectin E, selectin L, and selectin P ligands, as well as many other important mediators of tumor malignancy, such as IL-6, IL-8, toll-like receptors TLR-4 and TLR-5, MMP9 and transcription factors c-Jun and c-Fos (12, 22)

More recently, MTDH/AEG-1 has also been connected with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the activation of the Raf/MEK/MAPK branch of the Ras signaling pathway (28). The MTDH/AEG-1-expressing clones of human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG3 cells displayed stronger activities of several MAP kinases, including ERK and p38. These kinases phosphorylate GSK3β and increase the stability and nuclear translocation of β-catenin. Furthermore, MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression also increases the level of LEF-1, a transcription factor that interacts with β-catenin to activate gene expression in the nucleus. Specific inhibitors of the MAPK pathway are able to abolish the oncogenic effect of MTDH/AEG-1 in Matrigel invasion and anchorage-independent growth (28).

Metastasis

A lung homing domain (LHD, amino acids 378-440 in mouse or 381-443 in human) in MTDH/AEG1 was identified by Brown et al. in a phage display experiment to be a mediator of 4T1 mouse mammary tumor cell adhesion to lung vasculature (8). Neutralizing antibodies against LHD or siRNA silencing of MTDH/AEG-1 efficiently reduced lung metastasis of 4T1 cancer cells. Conversely, overexpression of MTDH/AEG-1 in the human embryonic kidney cells HEK293 led to enhanced localization of these cells to lung vasculatures (8). The endothelial adhesion and metastasis-promoting function of MTDH/AEG-1 has been validated using the MDA-MB-231 xenograft model of breast cancer metastasis (29). In this model system, MTDH/AEG-1 was found to not only promote lung metastasis, but also modestly increase bone metastasis. MTDH/AEG-1 may promote metastasis through the interaction of the LHD with an unknown receptor expressed in the surface of endothelial cells, or indirectly through the activation of signaling pathways, such as NFκB, that activate the expression of adhesion molecules.

Chemoresistance

In addition to promoting cell survival in the serum starvation condition through activating the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (21, 22), a more general role for MTDH/AEG-1 to confer broad-spectrum chemoresistance has also been discovered recently (29, 30). Pharmacogenomic analysis of the NCI-60 panel of cancer cell lines revealed a significant correlation of MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression with the resistance of cancer cells to a broader spectrum of chemical compounds. In vitro and in vivo chemoresistance analyses showed that MTDH/AEG-1 knockdown sensitize several different breast cancer cell lines to paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cisplatin, 4-hydroxycylcophosphamide, hydrogen peroxide, and UV-radiation. The chemosistance function of MTDH/AEG-1 has also been extended to neuroblastoma (30) and prostate cancer (Hu et al., unpublished results). MTDH/AEG-1 does not affect the uptake or retention of chemotherapy drugs. Instead, MTDH/AEG-1 may increase chemoresistance by promoting cell survival after chemotherapeutic stress. This could be mediated by the pro-survival pathways such as PI3K and NFκB, or through other downstream genes of MTDH/AEG-1 that directly regulate chemoresistance. Microarray analysis of breast cancer cells revealed that MTDH/AEG-1 knockdown led to decreased expression of chemoresistance genes ALDH3A1, MET, HSP90 and HMOX1, and increased expression of pro-apoptotic genes BNIP3 and TRAIL (29). Among these genes, ALDH3A1 and MET were validated to partially contribute to the chemoresistance role of MTDH/AEG-1 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (29). Microarray analysis of MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression in HepG2 cells reveal another panel of genes that may also contribute to chemoresistance. These genes included drug-metabolizing enzymes for different chemotherapeutic agents, such as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), cytochrome P4502B6 (CYP2B6), dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (AKR1C2) and the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCC11 for drug efflux (28). Together, these genes may mediate the broad-spectrum chemoresistance function of MTDH/AEG-1 in different cancer types.

Clinical-Translational Advances

Consistent with the role of MTDH/AEG-1 in many different aspects of tumor malignancy, recent clinical studies has convincingly linked MTDH/AEG-1 with tumor progression and poor clinical outcomes in many cancer types, including breast cancer, prostate cancers, glioma, esophageal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. These findings suggest that MTDH/AEG-1 may be developed as a powerful independent poor-prognosis marker and a molecular target for anti-cancer therapeutics.

Breast cancer

MTDH/AEG-1 is expressed in low levels or is absent in most of normal human breast tissues, but was found to be frequently overexpressed in breast cancer cell lines or breast tumors (7, 8, 29, 31). Two independent analyses using breast tumor samples collected in the United States and in China revealed strikingly similar patterns of MTDH/AEG-1 expression and clinical association (29, 31). MTDH/AEG-1 is abundantly expressed in about 44%-47% of the primary tumors and is significantly correlated with clinical stage, tumor size, lymph node spread, distant metastasis and poor survival (29, 31). MTDH/AEG-1 expression was not correlated with other common clinicopathological parameters including age, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and p53 status. No significant difference of MTDH/AEG-1 expression is observed in basal or luminal subtypes of breast tumors (29). Multivariate analysis suggested that MTDH/AEG-1 expression is an independent prognostic indicator for the survival of patients with breast cancer (29, 31). MTDH/AEG-1 is located at chromosome 8q22, a region frequently amplified in many cancers and is associated with poor prognosis (29, 32-35). Indeed, MTDH/AEG-1 is consistently found to be overexpressed in breast tumors with genomic gain of 8q22 (29), although a substantial fraction of tumors with normal copies of MTDH/AEG-1 also overexpress the protein, suggesting alternative mechanisms of MTDH/AEG-1 up-regulation (e.g. through c-Myc activation). Genomic gain of 8q22 has also been associated with increased expression of MTDH/AEG-1 in glioma and liver cancers (7, 28).

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)

Similar to the breast cancer studies, immunohistochemical analysis of 168 ESCC specimens revealed that 47.6% of tumors exhibited high levels of MTDH/AEG-1 expression (36). Overexpression of MTDH/AEG-1 was significantly correlated with the clinical stage and various tumor grading parameters, as well as shorter survival. Multivariate analysis again indicated that MTDH/AEG-1 expression as an independent poor-prognostic indicator for ESCC patients (36).

Prostate cancer

MTDH/AEG-1 is overexpressed in prostate cancer samples and cell lines compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue samples and normal prostate epithelial cells (11, 22 and Hu et al., unpublished data). MTDH/AEG-1 inhibition reduces cell viability and promotes apoptosis of prostate cancer cells, but not normal prostate epithelial cells (22). MTDH/AEG-1 is also shown to affect the invasive property of PC3 and DU145 prostate cancer cells (22 and Hu et al., unpublished data). Interestingly, decreased nuclear staining of MTDH/AEG-1 was associated with increased Gleason grade and shorter survival of patients (11). MTDH may have a nuclear function in normal prostate tissue and is lost in tumorigenesis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, expression of MTDH/AEG1 gradually increases from stage I to IV and with the decreasing degree of differentiation (28). MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression enhances anchorage-independent growth, Matrigel invasion, in vivo tumorigenicty and angiogenesis through the enhancement of PI3K/Akt, MAPK, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways (28).

MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression has also been documented in glioma, melanoma and neuroblastoma (7, 30). Overall, MTDH/AEG-1 overxpression is strongly correlated with advanced tumor characteristics and poor clinical outcomes and is a promising target for novel therapeutics.

Clinical translation and therapeutic targeting strategy

First of all, MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression or genomic amplification can be used as biomarker to identify subgroups of patients who require more aggressive treatment and are likely to benefit from MTDH/AEG-1 targeted therapies. Patients with MTDH/AEG-1 overexpression or amplification in their tumors are more likely to suffer from metastatic recurrence and may need to be monitored closely for clinical signs of relapse so that therapeutic inventions can be applied early enough for optimal outcomes. Furthermore, for these high-risk patients, a higher dose of chemotherapy may be required and combination of chemotherapy with MTDH/AEG-1 inhibition may help increase the efficacy of chemotherapy. There are several possible avenues to develop novel cancer treatments based on molecular targeting of MTDH/AEG-1. Neutralizing antibodies against MTDH/AEG-1 can be used to block its function in endothelial adhesion and reduce the risk of metastasis (8). Polyclonal antibodies against the lung-homing domain of MTDH/AEG-1 has been shown to reduce lung metastasis by 40% when co-injected with 4T1 mouse mammary tumor cells in experimental lung metastasis assays (8). Similar experiments using different treatment windows in pre-clinical metastasis models of human breast cancer need to be tested to further validate the feasibility of this approach before humanized monoclonal antibodies against MTDH/AEG-1 can be developed for clinical trials. Alternatively, siRNAs-based reagents can be developed to reduce MTDH/AEG-1 expression if the high-efficiency of siRNA delivery to tumors in vivo can be achieved. Indeed, inhibition of MTDH/AEG-1 expression by RNA interference has been shown to effectively reduce metastasis by 3-10 folds in MDA-MB-231 xenograft model of breast cancer lung metastasis (29). Furthermore, MTDH/AEG-1 knockdown sensitizes chemoresistant MDA-MB-231 breast tumors to paclitaxel or doxorubicin (29). In hepatocellular carcinoma, adenoviral delivery of MTDH/AEG-1-targeting shRNA inhibits xenograft primary tumor growth in mice (28). Thus, MTDH/AEG-1 inhibition may be applied in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings to not only increase the response rate of chemotherapy and reduce tumor growth but also reduce the systemic spread of metastatic cancer. Finally, identification of functionally important interactions between MTDH/AEG-1 and its partners may lead to the discovery of small molecule compounds targeting MTDH/AEG-1. Since considerable level of MTDH/AEG-1 is located in the cytoplasm and nucleus, inhibitors that block its intracellular functions may be needed to effectively reduce its multiple functions in promoting tumor malignancy. However, as a novel protein with poorly characterized functions, it is currently difficult to speculate what kind of small molecule inhibitors can be used to block the intracellular function of MTDH/AEG-1. Further functional characterization of MTDH/AEG-1 is urgently needed to realize its full therapeutic potential.

Conclusions

As a relatively novel gene, MTDH/AEG-1 has emerged as an important regulator in multiple aspects of cancer development and progression. Clinical and functional analyses have established this multi-functional gene as a potentially valuable target in cancer treatments. However, the functional mechanisms of MTDH/AEG-1 in regulating oncogenic signaling pathways remain poorly understood and some of the findings need to be validated in a broader collection of model systems. In addition to its direct interaction with p65 and CBP, MTDH/AEG-1 was recently found by a yeast hybrid screen to interact and destabilize BCCIPα, a cofactor for tumor suppressors BRCA2 and p21CIP (37). Additional interacting partners for MTDH/AEG-1, particularly its adhesion receptor in endothelial cells, still need to be identified. Further studies to clarify the normal physiological roles of MTDH/AEG-1, the function of its various isoforms, as well as the regulation of its cellular localization will facilitate the development of novel cancer treatments through molecular targeting of MTDH/AEG-1.

References

1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. [PubMed]
2. Steeg PS. Tumor metastasis: mechanistic insights and clinical challenges. Nature medicine. 2006;12:895–904. [PubMed]
3. Gupta GP, Massague J. Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell. 2006;127:679–95. [PubMed]
4. Emdad L, Sarkar D, Su ZZ, et al. Astrocyte elevated gene-1: recent insights into a novel gene involved in tumor progression, metastasis and neurodegeneration. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2007;114:155–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Kwong LN, Chin L. The metastasis problem gets stickier. Cancer cell. 2009;15:1–2. [PubMed]
6. Su ZZ, Kang DC, Chen Y, et al. Identification and cloning of human astrocyte genes displaying elevated expression after infection with HIV-1 or exposure to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein by rapid subtraction hybridization, RaSH. Oncogene. 2002;21:3592–602. [PubMed]
7. Kang DC, Su ZZ, Sarkar D, Emdad L, Volsky DJ, Fisher PB. Cloning and characterization of HIV-1-inducible astrocyte elevated gene-1, AEG-1. Gene. 2005;353:8–15. [PubMed]
8. Brown DM, Ruoslahti E. Metadherin, a cell surface protein in breast tumors that mediates lung metastasis. Cancer cell. 2004;5:365–74. [PubMed]
9. Britt DE, Yang DF, Yang DQ, et al. Identification of a novel protein, LYRIC, localized to tight junctions of polarized epithelial cells. Experimental cell research. 2004;300:134–48. [PubMed]
10. Sutherland HG, Lam YW, Briers S, Lamond AI, Bickmore WA. 3D3/lyric: a novel transmembrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope, which is also present in the nucleolus. Experimental cell research. 2004;294:94–105. [PubMed]
11. Thirkettle HJ, Girling J, Warren AY, et al. LYRIC/AEG-1 Is Targeted to Different Subcellular Compartments by Ubiquitinylation and Intrinsic Nuclear Localization Signals. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 [PubMed]
12. Emdad L, Sarkar D, Su ZZ, et al. Activation of the nuclear factor kappaB pathway by astrocyte elevated gene-1: implications for tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer research. 2006;66:1509–16. [PubMed]
13. Lee SG, Su ZZ, Emdad L, Sarkar D, Fisher PB. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) is a target gene of oncogenic Ha-ras requiring phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and c-Myc. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:17390–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Hunter T. Signaling--2000 and beyond. Cell. 2000;100:113–27. [PubMed]
15. Blume-Jensen P, Hunter T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature. 2001;411:355–65. [PubMed]
16. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:459–65. [PubMed]
17. Sebolt-Leopold JS, Herrera R. Targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to treat cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:937–47. [PubMed]
18. Bodemann BO, White MA. Ral GTPases and cancer: linchpin support of the tumorigenic platform. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:133–40. [PubMed]
19. Bader AG, Kang S, Zhao L, Vogt PK. Oncogenic PI3K deregulates transcription and translation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:921–9. [PubMed]
20. Rottmann S, Wang Y, Nasoff M, Deveraux QL, Quon KC. A TRAIL receptor-dependent synthetic lethal relationship between MYC activation and GSK3beta/FBW7 loss of function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:15195–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Lee SG, Su ZZ, Emdad L, Sarkar D, Franke TF, Fisher PB. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 activates cell survival pathways through PI3K-Akt signaling. Oncogene. 2007 [PubMed]
22. Kikuno N, Shiina H, Urakami S, et al. Knockdown of astrocyte-elevated gene-1 inhibits prostate cancer progression through upregulation of FOXO3a activity. Oncogene. 2007;26:7647–55. [PubMed]
23. Plas DR, Thompson CB. Akt activation promotes degradation of tuberin and FOXO3a via the proteasome. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:12361–6. [PubMed]
24. Baud V, Karin M. Is NF-kappaB a good target for cancer therapy? Hopes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:33–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Karin M. Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. Nature. 2006;441:431–6. [PubMed]
26. Karin M, Lin A. NF-kappaB at the crossroads of life and death. Nature immunology. 2002;3:221–7. [PubMed]
27. Sarkar D, Park ES, Emdad L, Lee SG, Su ZZ, Fisher PB. Molecular basis of nuclear factor-kappaB activation by astrocyte elevated gene-1. Cancer research. 2008;68:1478–84. [PubMed]
28. Yoo BK, Emdad L, Su ZZ, et al. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:465–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Hu G, Chong RA, Yang Q, et al. MTDH activation by 8q22 genomic gain promotes chemoresistance and metastasis of poor-prognosis breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:9–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Liu H, Song X, Liu C, Xie L, Wei L, Sun R. Knockdown of astrocyte elevated gene-1 inhibits proliferation and enhancing chemo-sensitivity to cisplatin or doxorubicin in neuroblastoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Li J, Zhang N, Song LB, et al. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 is a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer progression and overall patient survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3319–26. [PubMed]
32. Kim DH, Mohapatra G, Bollen A, Waldman FM, Feuerstein BG. Chromosomal abnormalities in glioblastoma multiforme tumors and glioma cell lines detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Int J Cancer. 1995;60:812–9. [PubMed]
33. Ried T, Just KE, Holtgreve-Grez H, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas. Cancer research. 1995;55:5415–23. [PubMed]
34. Warr T, Ward S, Burrows J, et al. Identification of extensive genomic loss and gain by comparative genomic hybridisation in malignant astrocytoma in children and young adults. Genes, chromosomes & cancer. 2001;31:15–22. [PubMed]
35. Bergamaschi A, Kim YH, Wang P, et al. Distinct patterns of DNA copy number alteration are associated with different clinicopathological features and gene-expression subtypes of breast cancer. Genes, chromosomes & cancer. 2006;45:1033–40. [PubMed]
36. Yu C, Chen K, Zheng H, et al. Overexpression of Astrocyte Elevated Gene-1 (AEG-1) Is Associated with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) Progression and Pathogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2009 [PubMed]
37. Ash SC, Yang DQ, Britt DE. LYRIC/AEG-1 overexpression modulates BCCIPalpha protein levels in prostate tumor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;371:333–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...