• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmccancBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Cancer
BMC Cancer. 2009; 9: 288.
Published online Aug 20, 2009. doi:  10.1186/1471-2407-9-288
PMCID: PMC2745428

Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, albumin and age are supplementary to UICC staging systems in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine influence of prognostic factors in addition to UICC staging systems, on cancer-specific and overall survival rates for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing surgical treatment.

Methods

Between January 1996 and December 2006, a total of 1367 CRC patients who underwent surgical treatment in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital were analyzed. We retrospectively investigated clinicopathologic features of these patients. All patients were followed up intensively, and their outcomes were investigated completely.

Results

Of 1367 CRC patients, there were seven hundred and fifty-seven males (55.4%) and 610 (44.6%) females. The median follow-up period was 60 months (range, 3–132 months). A multivariate analysis identified that low serum albumin level (P = 0.011), advanced UICC stage (P < 0.001), and high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival. Meanwhile, a multivariate analysis showed age over 65 years (P < 0.001), advanced UICC stage (P < 0.001), and high CEA level (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Furthermore, combination of UICC stage, serum CEA and albumin levels as predictors of cancer-specific survival showed that the poorer the prognostic factors involved, the poorer the cancer-specific survival rate. Likewise, combination of UICC stage, age and serum CEA level as predictors of overall survival showed that the poorer the prognostic factors involved, the poorer the overall survival rate. Of these prognostic factors, preoperative serum CEA level was the only significant prognostic factor for patients with stage II and III CRCs in both cancer-specific and overall survival categories.

Conclusion

Preoperative serum albumin level, CEA level and age could prominently affect postoperative outcome of CRC patients undergoing surgical treatment. In addition to conventional UICC staging system, it might be imperative to take these additional characteristics of factors into account in CRC patients prior to surgical treatment.

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer and also the third leading cause of cancer death in Taiwan, and it is also a significant health problem. In Taiwan, it is estimated that approximately 10000 CRC patients were diagnosed, and over 4100 patients died of this disease in 2006 (http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/index.htm; accessed in December 2008). The prognosis of CRC patients is mainly dependent on several factors: pathological, clinical and biological. Although pathologic stage [International Union against Cancer (UICC) classification] is useful for predicting prognosis in CRC patients, it is difficult to accurately determine the stage prior to surgical treatment [1]. Furthermore, it is well known that patients with the same UICC stage colonic and rectal cancers display survival heterogeneity, with some patients exhibiting relatively short survival times. Accordingly, the identification of more promising prognostic factors that are indeed highly predictive of CRC patients undergoing surgical treatment is mandatory. To date, a number of studies have been extensively conducted to explore the role of prognostic factors for survival in patients with CRC. Of these parameters, age, serum albumin, histology, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels have previously been demonstrated to be powerful prognostic indicators for CRC patients [2-9]. However, information of an overall view of these factors in combination is scant. Combining these important prognostic factors might be important to be auxiliary to the UICC staging system in preoperative accurate prediction of cancer-specific and overall survival rates for CRC patients more precisely. The aim of this study was to identify clinical or pathologic variables that could be used preoperatively to predict postoperative cancer-specific and overall survival rates of CRC patients more accurately, in addition to conventional UICC staging systems.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective cohort study included 1422 consecutive patients with histologically proven CRC who were receiving surgical treatment at the Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. Patients of postoperative mortality that was defined as death within the first 30 days after operation (n = 23) and/or having an incomplete record of medical charts (n = 32) were excluded. A total remaining 1367 patients were enrolled into this study. The study was approved by the Institutional Hospital Board of the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. Patients' clinical outcomes and survival status were regularly followed up till 31 December 2007. Available variables included: age of onsets, sex, tumor location, preoperative serum albumin, serum CEA, and TNM/UICC classification defined according to the criteria of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/International Union against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) [1]. We dichotomized continuous variables into two categories for statistical analysis including age: those aged <65 years (n = 624) and those ≥65 years (n = 743); serum albumin level: < 3.5 gm/dl (n = 392) and those ≥3.5 gm/dl (n = 975); serum CEA level: <5 ng/ml (n = 724) and ≥5 ng/ml (n = 643). All patients were followed up until their death, and only patients who died of CRC were included in the cancer-specific death category. Cancer-specific survival was defined as the time elapsed between primary surgery and death from CRC. Overall survival was defined as the time elapsed between primary surgery and death from any cause.

Statistical analysis

All data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For the univariate statistical analysis, Chi-square test was used where applicable. A Cox proportional hazards model with forward stepwise variable selection was used for multivariate testing of those factors found to be significant by univariate analysis (the inclusion factors were those with P value less than 0.05 by univariate analysis). Overall and cancer-specific survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in survival rates were analyzed by the log-rank test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The clinical and pathologic data regarding 1367 CRC patients are summarized in Table Table1.1. There were 757 (55.4%) males and 610 (44.6%) females. Nine hundred and twenty (67.3%) patients had carcinoma of the colon, and 447 (32.7%) had carcinoma of the rectum. The median age of these patients was 66 years with a range of 19 to 95 years. Six hundred and twenty-four (45.6%) cases were < 65 years old and seven hundred and forty-three cases were (54.4%) ≥ 65 years old. With regard to the histological type of these tumors, 183 (13.4%) were well differentiated carcinoma, 1066 (77.9%) were moderately differentiated carcinoma, and 118 (8.7%) were poorly differentiated carcinoma. When classified with the UICC staging system, there were 230 (16.8%) stage I patients, 506 (37.1%) stage II patients, 391 (28.6%) stage III patients, and 240 (17.5%) stage IV patients.

Table 1
Demographic data in 1367 colorectal cancer patients

Using univariate analysis of cancer-specific survival, we found that sex (P = 0.002), tumor size (P = 0.015), serum albumin level (P < 0.001), histology (P < 0.001), UICC stage (P < 0.001) and serum CEA level (P < 0.001) were statistically significant (Table (Table2).2). Moreover, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that patients with serum albumin levels < 3.5 gm/dl were 1.45 times more likely to die of cancer than those whose serum albumin levels ≥3.5 gm/dl (P = 0.011; HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09–1.92); patients with UICC stage III/IV were 3.25 times more likely to die of cancer than those with UICC stage I/II (P < 0.001; HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.42–4.36); patients with serum CEA ≥5 ng/ml were 2.38 times more likely to die of cancer than those whose serum CEA <5 ng/ml (P < 0.001; HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.77–3.20) for cancer-specific survival. Moreover, the combination of UICC stage, serum CEA and serum albumin levels as predictors of cancer-specific survival is shown in Table Table3.3. It was demonstrated, whatever the presence of any one predictor, or any two predictors or all three predictors, to be significant for cancer-specific survival of CRC patients (all P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the increased risk of cancer-specific survival is proportionate to the involved numbers of these three variables. CRC patients with serum CEA level < 5 ng/ml (P < 0.001; Figure Figure1)1) or albumin level ≥ 3.5 gm/dl (P < 0.001; Figure Figure2)2) had significantly greater cancer-specific survival rates than those with serum CEA levels ≥ 5 ng/ml or albumin level <3.5 gm/dl respectively. Moreover, CRC patients with age < 65 years (P < 0.001; Figure Figure3)3) or serum CEA levels < 5 ng/ml (P = 0.003; Figure Figure4)4) had significantly greater overall survival rates than those with age = 65 years or serum CEA levels ≥ 5 ng/ml respectively.

Table 2
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic indicators on cancer-specific survival for colorectal cancer patients
Table 3
Combination of carcinoembryonic antigen, albumin supplementary to UICCa staging system as predictors of colorectal cancer for cancer specific survival by Cox regression analysis
Figure 1
Cumulative cancer-specific survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer according to serum albumin level (P < 0.001).
Figure 2
Cumulative cancer-specific survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer according to serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P < 0.001).
Figure 3
Cumulative overall survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer according to age (P = 0.003).
Figure 4
Cumulative overall survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer according to serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P < 0.001).

Table Table44 shows the univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival, age (P = 0.003), sex (P = 0.026), tumor size (P = 0.026), serum albumin level (P < 0.001), histology (P < 0.001), UICC stage (P < 0.001) and serum CEA level (P < 0.001) were significantly correlated to overall survival by univariate analysis. Furthermore, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that patients over 65 years of age were 1.85 times more likely to die of cancer than those under 65 years of age (P < 0.001; HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.41–2.43); patients with UICC stage III/IV were 3.09 times more likely to die of cancer than those with UICC stage I/II (P < 0.001; HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.34–4.07); patients with serum CEA ≥ 5 ng/ml were 2.28 times more likely to die of cancer than those whose serum CEA <5 ng/ml (P < 0.001; HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.73–3.01) for overall survival. Moreover, the combination of age, UICC stage, and serum CEA level as predictors of overall survival is shown in Table Table5.5. It was demonstrated, whatever the presence of any one predictor, or any two predictors or all three predictors, to be significant for cancer-specific survival of CRC patients (all P < 0.001). Similarly, the increased risk of overall survival was proportionate to the involved numbers of these three variables.

Table 4
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic indicators on overall survival for colorectal cancer patients
Table 5
Combination of carcinoembryonic antigen, age supplementary to UICCa staging system as predictors of colorectal cancer for cancer overall survival by Cox regression analysis

To identify the promising prognostic factors of cancer-specific and overall survival rates in stage II or stage III CRC patients preoperatively, we further tried to analyze stage II and III CRC patients respectively. Of these factors, preoperative serum CEA level was the only significant prognostic factor for patients with stage II (Tables (Tables66 and and7)7) and III (Tables (Tables88 and and9)9) CRCs in both cancer-specific and overall survival categories (all P < 0.005), despite age was also one independent prognostic factor of overall survival in stage II and III CRC patients.

Table 6
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic indicators on cancer-specific survival for stage II colorectal cancer patients
Table 7
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic indicators on overall survival for stage II colorectal cancer patients
Table 8
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic indicators on cancer-specific survival for stage III colorectal cancer patients
Table 9
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic indicators on overall survival for stage III colorectal cancer patients

Discussion

This current study revealed the association of preoperative serum albumin level, CEA level and age with survival of CRC patients undergoing surgical treatment, which is adjuvant to conventional UICC staging system. Particularly, our study demonstrated that combining preoperative serum albumin level, CEA level and UICC stage significantly affect the cancer-specific survival of patients with CRC postoperatively. Meanwhile, the combination of serum CEA level, age and UICC stage prominently affected the overall survival of CRC patients postoperatively. In contrast to UICC pathological stage, the upmost important meaning is that these three factors including serum albumin level, CEA level, and age could be available preoperatively.

Consistent with previous investigations [5,8,10,11], preoperative low serum albumin may be a vital indicator and may predict an unfavorable prognosis for CRC patients. Serum albumin level has been traditionally used as a biochemical marker of individual nutritional status. Hypoalbuminemia is associated with the presence of a systemic inflammatory response, weight loss and metastatic tumor volume [12,13]. Moreover, serum albumin measurement is part of the liver function test battery, and for most patients it is measured even before cancer is diagnosed and before the staging protocol or the treatment program. The potential advantage of serum albumin level as a preoperative prognostic factor in CRC patients is that it is inexpensive, reproducible and powerful. Our results demonstrated that low serum albumin was an independent significant prognostic factor, even after adjusting for potential confounding factors. The possible explanation for the association between low serum albumin and poor survival in CRC patients might be due to cancer cachexia [5]. Besides, low serum albumin level is indicative of an ongoing systemic response, which causes the loss of body weight and body protein [5,10].

Since the first description in 1965, CEA has remained the most regularly examined tumor marker [14]. CEA is a high-molecular weight glycoprotein in the immunoglobulin superfamily of molecules, that plays a pivotal role in such biological phenomena as adhesion, immunity or apoptosis of the tumor cells and assessment of sensitivity to anti-tumor agents [15,16]. High serum CEA has been shown to be associated with a number of malignancies, including those of colorectal, breast, pancreas and lung types. Previous studies have shown that preoperative high serum CEA is associated with a poor prognosis [2-7,17-21]. Our results demonstrated that high serum CEA was an independent significant prognostic factor of all CRC patients and stage II/III CRC patients, even after adjusting for potential confounding factors. We found that high serum CEA levels were associated with poor survival in CRC patients, and the possible reason might result from increased tumor volume leading to a higher incidence of postoperative metastasis. Dixon et al. have demonstrated that patients with high CEA and low albumin levels likely reflect some type of systemic compromise from an activation of a metabolically active tumor, exhibiting a significantly decreased survival time in CRC patients [5]. However, these presumptions await further investigation for confirmation. We are endeavoring to find more efficient ways of combining independent factors instead of using single independent factors alone to predict survival time. Our results also reveal that combining serum albumin level, serum CEA level and UICC stage could be more accurate to predict cancer-specific survival rates of CRC patients.

On the other hand, several studies have also shown that old age is an independent prognostic factor associated with poor prognosis in CRC patients [22-25]. The higher postoperative morbidity rate in the older age patient group is because of the significant enhancement in common postoperative complications. Consistent with our observation, Schiffmann et al. also revealed that the worse prognosis was in older CRC patients [24]. Older age may be associated with cardiovascular diseases or other medical illness [26], and with the significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications [27]; hence, older age is associated with poor overall survival, but not cancer-specific survival, in CRC patients. Actually, patient age has a decisive impact on the short-term postoperative outcome of patients undergoing surgery for CRC [28]. Ultimately, our current study suggests that cancer-specific and overall mortality should be considered separately in survival analysis of CRC patients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, preoperative serum albumin level, CEA level and age could affect postoperative outcome of CRC patients undergoing surgical treatment. Of these factors, preoperative serum CEA level is the only significant prognostic factor for patients with stage II and III CRCs. Preoperatively, the identified prognostic factors supplementary to UICC staging system may be potentially useful to improve the prediction of cancer-specific survival and overall survival in CRC patients. However, it will be necessary to analyze clinical data from multiple institutions to find additional related variables in order to develop a more efficient and accurate way for predicting surgical outcome of CRC patients.

Abbreviations

CRC: colorectal cancer; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LCS analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. KSC, SZZ, CYL, CHK, JSH and YLS made substantial contributions in data acquisition, statistical analyses and data interpretation, and helped in manuscript preparation. SJC and JYW participated in study design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/288/prepub

References

  • International Union against Cancer. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc; 2002.
  • Bannura G, Cumsille MA, Contreras J, Barrera A, Melo C, Soto D. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. Rev Med Chil. 2004;132:691–700. [PubMed]
  • Wang JY, Lu CY, Chu KS, Ma CJ, Wu DC, Tsai HL, Yu FJ, Hsieh JS. Prognostic significance of pre- and postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur Surg Res. 2007;39:245–250. doi: 10.1159/000101952. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ma CJ, Hsieh JS, Wang WM, Su YC, Huang CJ, Huang TJ, Wang JY. Multivariate analysis of prognostic determinants for colorectal cancer patients with high preoperative serum CEA levels: prognostic value of postoperative serum CEA levels. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2006;22:604–609. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70360-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dixon MR, Haukoos JS, Udani SM, Naghi JJ, Arnell TD, Kumar RR, Stamos MJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen and albumin predict survival in patients with advanced colon and rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2003;138:962–966. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.962. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Veingerl B. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients operated for colorectal carcinoma. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001;113(Suppl 3):32–38. [PubMed]
  • Wang WS, Lin JK, Chiou TJ, Liu JH, Fan FS, Yen CC, Lin TC, Jiang JK, Yang SH, Wang HS, Chen PM. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: Taiwan experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2000;30:12–16. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyd003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Heys SD, Walker LG, Deehan DJ, Eremin OE. Serum albumin: a prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998;43:163–168. [PubMed]
  • Paul Hermanek. Prognostic factor research in oncology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:371–374. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00177-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cengiz O, Kocer B, Surmeli S, Santicky MJ, Soran A. Are pretreatment serum albumin and cholesterol levels prognostic tools in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12:CR240–247. [PubMed]
  • Lis CG, Grutsch JF, Vashi PG, Lammersfeld CA. Is serum albumin an independent predictor of survival in patients with breast cancer? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:10–15. doi: 10.1177/014860710302700110. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Al-Shaiba R, McMillan DC, Angerson WJ, Leen E, McArdle CS, Horgan P. The relationship between hypoalbuminemia, tumor volume and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:205–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McMillan DC, Watson WS, O'Gorman P, Preston T, Scott HR, McArdle CS. Albumin concentrations are primarily determined by the body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients with weigh loss. Nutr Cancer. 2001;39:210–213. doi: 10.1207/S15327914nc392_8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gold P, Freedman SO. Demonstration of Tumor-Specific Antigens in Human Colonic Carcinomata by Immunological Tolerance and Absorption Techniques. J Exp Med. 1965;121:439–462. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.3.439. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hammarstrom S. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues. Semin Cancer Biol. 1999;9:67–81. doi: 10.1006/scbi.1998.0119. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Duffy MJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? Clin Chem. 2001;47:624–630. [PubMed]
  • Carriquiry LA, Pineyro A. Should carcinoembryonic antigen be used in the management of patients with colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:921–929. doi: 10.1007/BF02237104. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sener SF, Imperato JP, Chmiel J, Fremgen A, Sylvester J. The use of cancer registry data to study preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as an indicator of survival in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1989;39:50–57. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.39.1.50. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chapman MA, Buckley D, Henson DB, Armitage NC. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen is related to tumour stage and long-term survival in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;78:1346–1349. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wanebo HJ, Rao B, Pinsky CM, Hoffman RG, Stearns M, Schwartz MK, Oettgen HF. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:448–451. [PubMed]
  • Tsuchiya A, Ando Y, Kikuchi Y, Kanno M, Sato H, Yoshida T, Abe R. Reappraisal of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels as a prognostic factor in resectable colorectal cancer. Fukushima J Med Sci. 1994;40:9–17. [PubMed]
  • Faivre-Finn C, Bouvier-Benhamiche AM, Phelip JM, Manfredi S, Dancourt V, Faivre J. Colon cancer in France: evidence for improvement in management and survival. Gut. 2002;51:60–64. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.1.60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bufalari A, Giustozzi G, Burattini MF, Servili S, Bussotti C, Lucaroni E, Ricci E, Sciannameo F. Rectal cancer surgery in the elderly: a multivariate analysis of outcome risk factors. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:173–180. doi: 10.1002/jso.20300. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schiffmann L, Ozcan S, Schwarz F, Lange J, Prall F, Klar E. Colorectal cancer in the elderly: surgical treatment and long-term survival. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:601–610. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0457-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Ko CY. Are survival rates different for young and older patients with rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2064–2069. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0738-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Driver JA, Djousse L, Logroscino G, Gaziano JM, Kurth T. Incidence of cardiovascular disease and cancer in advanced age: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a2467–2474. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2467. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Steinert R, Ueberrueck T, Bittner R, Berg E, Engemann R, Gellert K, Arbogast R, Korner T, Kockerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H. The impact of the risk factor "age" on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management. World J Surg. 2005;29:1013–1021. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7711-6. discussion 1021-1012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Zippel R, Gastmeier J, Geissler S, Pross M, Gastingwer I, Lippert H. Impact of age on the short-term postoperative outcome of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis. 2002;17:177–184. doi: 10.1007/s003840100344. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...