![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Developmental Biology β-Catenin promotes respiratory progenitor identity in mouse foregut aLaboratory of Genetics and bDivision of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: xsun/at/wisc.edu Edited by Judith Kimble, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, and approved August 11, 2009 Author contributions: X.S. designed research; K.S.H.-J., E.T.D., and C.M.V. performed research; K.S.H.-J., E.T.D., C.M.V., and X.S. analyzed data; and K.S.H.-J. and X.S. wrote the paper. Received March 3, 2009. Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. Abstract The mammalian respiratory system, consisting of both trachea and lung, initiates from the foregut endoderm. The molecular program that instructs endodermal cells to adopt the respiratory fate is not fully understood. Here we show that conditional inactivation of β-Catenin (also termed Ctnnb1) in foregut endoderm leads to absence of both the trachea and lung due to a failure in maintaining the respiratory fate. In converse, conditional expression of an activated form of β-Catenin leads to expansion of Nkx2.1, an early marker for the trachea and lung, into adjacent endoderm including the stomach epithelium. Analyses of these mutants show that the loss or gain of trachea/lung progenitor identity is accompanied by an expansion or contraction of esophagus/stomach progenitor identity, respectively. Our findings reveal an early role for β-Catenin in the establishment of respiratory progenitors in mouse foregut endoderm. Keywords: FGF, lung, progenitor cells, Wnt Initiation of the respiratory system, namely the trachea and lung, is achieved in two steps: specification and morphogenesis. Specification is the process whereby respiratory progenitors become distinct from neighboring endodermal cells. In mouse, these progenitors reside in the ventral portion of the foregut tube adjacent to heart,and are first defined by their expression of the homeodomain-containing transcription factor gene Nkx2.1 (1, 2). Following the emergence of these progenitors, morphogenesis ensues. Epithelium at the caudal portion of the respiratory primordium evaginates into the surrounding splanchnic mesenchyme, forming the primary lung buds. Shortly thereafter, epithelium at the rostral portion of the primordium separates from the dorsal foregut and develops into a tube, forming the trachea. In recent years, the molecular program that controls trachea/lung specification and morphogenesis has begun to be elucidated in mouse. In vitro culture experiments show that signals emanating from the cardiac mesoderm induce trachea/lung specification (3). In particular, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) from the cardiac mesoderm serve to pattern the adjacent endoderm in a threshold-dependent manner. Cells closest to the cardiac mesoderm receive the highest amount of FGF signal and are induced to form trachea/lung. Cells positioned more caudally receive a lower amount of FGF signal and develop into the liver (4). Finally, cells out of range of the signal adopt the pancreas fate as a default. FGF signaling also plays a critical role in lung morphogenesis. FGF10, one of the FGF family members, is expressed in the mesenchyme adjacent to the lung primodium and likely acts as a chemoattractant for the evagination of the primary lung buds (5, 6). In support of this role, inactivation of either Fgf10, or its obligate receptor gene Fgf receptor 2 (Fgfr2, specifically splice variant IIIb) leads to a failure of lung budding even though respiratory specification occurs as indicated by the presence of the trachea (7–9). Recent data suggest that Fgf10 expression in the mesenchyme is regulated by retinoic acid (RA) and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling, implicating these pathways in trachea/lung initiation (10). WNT signaling has been shown to play key roles in lung development. Several WNT ligands are expressed in the developing lung, including the Wnt2 (also known as Wnt2a), Wnt2b (also known as Wnt13), Wnt5a, Wnt7b, and Wnt11 genes (5, 11–15). These ligands have been shown to signal through different downstream pathways. In this study, we will focus on the WNT/β-Catenin (also referred to as canonical WNT) pathway where β-Catenin (also known as Ctnnb1-Mouse Genome Informatics) acts as a critical transcriptional mediator of WNT signaling (16). Inactivation of β-Catenin in lung epithelium after lung budding leads to aberrant epithelial branching and proximal-distal patterning (17, 18). Inactivation of β-Catenin in lung mesenchyme leads to decreased mesenchymal growth and a defect in endothelial differentiation (19, 20). Finally, a recent study shows that inactivation of β-Catenin during trachea/lung morphogenesis leads to shortening of the trachea and reduced lung size (21). Although multiple studies have demonstrated the requirement for β-Catenin at later stages of lung development, whether it is required for initiation of the respiratory lineage has not been directly addressed. In this study, we show that inactivation of β-Catenin in the ventral foregut endoderm results in absence of both trachea and lung. Analysis of this phenotype led to the conclusion that β-Catenin is not required for cell survival or proliferation, but rather is essential for maintaining the respiratory fate. Furthermore, we show that conditional activation of β-Catenin in the endoderm leads to expansion of the respiratory characteristics into the anterior stomach. Our findings suggest that β-Catenin promotes the respiratory identity in mouse. Results Inactivation of β-Catenin in Early Mouse Foregut Endoderm. To determine whether WNT/β-Catenin signaling is active in mouse foregut during respiratory initiation, we examined the expression of a number of Wnt genes for their expression in the foregut region. Wnt2 has been shown to be expressed in lung mesenchyme at branching stages (22). We found that at the budding stage, it is present in the mesenchyme adjacent to nascent lung buds (Fig. 1
To investigate the requirement for WNT/β-Catenin signaling in respiratory initiation, we disrupted β-Catenin function in foregut epithelium by conditional gene inactivation using Shhcre (29). By mating Shhcre mice to R26R cre reporter mice (30), we found that Shhcre is active in the foregut epithelium starting at the 16-somite (so) stage (≈E8.75) (Fig. 1 By mating Shhcre mice to mice carrying a conditional knockout allele of β-Catenin (Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem) (31), we generated Shhcre/+;Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem/tm2.1Kem (hereafter referred to as β-Catcko, for conditional knockout) mutant embryos. In the foregut of these embryos, we found that β-Catenin protein is severely reduced in the ventral foregut epithelium by the 19-so (≈9.0) stage, while it is clearly present in the dorsal foregut epithelium (Fig. 1 Inactivation of β-Catenin Leads to Trachea and Lung Agenesis. Gross examination indicated that β-Catcko mutant embryos are missing lungs, while other endoderm-derived internal organs are present (Fig. 2
To address whether specification of respiratory progenitors ever occurs in the β-Catcko mutant, we performed a time-course analysis of Nkx2.1 expression. We found that in the control foregut by RNA in situ hybridization, Nkx2.1 expression is not observed above background in the prospective respiratory region at the 16-so stage, but is clearly detected at the 18-so stage (≈E9.0) (Fig. 2 Cellular Mechanism Underlying Loss of Respiratory Progenitors. To determine the mechanism underlying the failure to maintain respiratory progenitors, we first addressed whether it is due to an increase in cell death in the mutant foregut. By detecting dying cells with an anti-cleaved Caspase 3 antibody, we found that there was no increase in Caspase 3 staining in the mutant foregut epithelium either during specification (≈19–21-so stage, n = 3) or during lung budding (≈28-so stage, n = 3) (Fig. 3
We next investigated whether the failure to maintain respiratory progenitors is due to a decrease in cell proliferation. We examined this at the 22-so stage, shortly after the depletion of β-Catenin protein in the β-Catcko mutant and when Nkx2.1 expression is first absent. By labeling cells in S-phase using BrdU incorporation, we found that there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of BrdU positive cells in the mutant foregut epithelium compared to control (Fig. 3 To address whether the failure to maintain respiratory progenitors is due to a defect in preserving proper foregut patterning, we examined whether loss of the respiratory lineage is accompanied by other cell fate changes in the foregut. We assayed for the expression of esophagus/stomach marker SOX2 in the common foregut tube before the tracheo-esophageal separation, and compared it to the expression domain of NKX2.1. In E10.5 control, we found that SOX2 expression was restricted to the dorsal portion of the foregut in the prospective esophageal cells, separate from NKX2.1-expressing cells in the ventral foregut (Fig. 2 FGF10 and Its Principal Receptor Remain Expressed in the β-Catcko Mutant Foregut. As genetic evidence demonstrates that FGF10 signaling via FGFR2 is essential for lung initiation (7–9), we sought to understand the relationship between WNT and FGF signaling in this process. We found that in β-Catcko mutants at E10.5, Fgf10 remains expressed in separated lateral domains in the lung mesenchyme (Fig. 3 Ectopic Activation of β-Catenin Leads to Expansion of a Respiratory Marker into the Anterior Stomach. The requirement for β-Catenin in maintaining the identity of respiratory progenitors led to the question of whether it is capable of inducing respiratory fate in other regions of the foregut. To address this question, we overexpressed an activated form of β-Catenin in the early endoderm. This is achieved by mating the Shhcre mice with mice carrying a conditional activated allele of β-Catenin, Ctnnb1tm1Mmt (32), generating Shhcre/+;Ctnnb1tm1Mmt/+ (hereafter referred to as β-Catact for activated mutation). It has been shown that cre-mediated recombination of the Ctnnb1tm1Mmt allele results in deletion of the phosphorylation target sites in β-Catenin, leading to stabilization of the protein and dominant activation of the WNT/β-Catenin pathway. We found that in β-Catact embryos at E10.5, in addition to expression in the trachea and lung, Nkx2.1 expression is expanded into the anterior stomach (forestomach), but not the posterior stomach (glandular stomach) or more caudal regions of the endoderm (Fig. 4
To address if the expansion of Nkx2.1 expression domain in β-Catact foregut is due to an increase in cell proliferation, we assayed for BrdU incorporation. We found that there is a slight decrease, rather than an increase, in the percentage of BrdU-positive cells in the β-Catact mutant compared to control at E10.5 (43.7 ± 5.3% in mutant vs. 57.6 ± 4.4% in control, P = 0.057), suggesting that the increase in Nkx2.1 expression domain is not likely a result of increased proliferation of respiratory progenitors. Similar to our analysis in β-Catcko mutants, we then addressed the effect of activated β-Catenin on foregut patterning by examining SOX2 and NKX2.1 expression domains in β-Catact mutants. We found that in transverse sections of E10.5 control embryos at the level of anterior stomach, SOX2 is expressed in the entire circumference, while NKX2.1 is not expressed (Fig. 4 Discussion Genetic evidence from both the β-Catcko and β-Catact mutants establishes β-Catenin as a key player responsible for initiating the respiratory development program. We show that respiratory progenitor identity is not maintained in β-Catcko mutants, while it is ectopically induced in β-Catact mutants. Neither of these phenotypes can be explained by changes in cell proliferation and/or cell survival in these mutants. Rather, the coordinated up or down-regulations of NKX2.1 versus SOX2 in the early foregut endoderm of these mutants support a role of β-Catenin in controlling the balance between the respiratory (trachea/lung) versus digestive (esophagus/stomach) progenitor identities. This role is consistent with the function of β-Catenin in adult lung stem cells in mice. Recent studies show that conditional activation of β-Catenin in adult lung epithelium leads to an increase in bronchioalveolar stem cell (BASC) number (34, 35). Further analysis of these adult mutant lungs show that there is no change in cell proliferation that would account for the phenotype, similar to our finding in β-Catact embryonic foregut. Rather, the increase of BASCs in the adult mutant lungs is due to the ability of β-Catenin in maintaining these cells in the progenitor state (34). This finding and our data together suggest that β-Catenin promotes respiratory progenitor characteristics both during lung initiation in the fetal lung and in stem cell maintenance in the adult lung. In addition to being a key mediator of canonical WNT signaling, β-Catenin has also been implicated in cell adhesion events independent of WNT signaling (36). Although our data do not exclude the possibility that β-Catenin functions outside of the WNT pathway to promote respiratory progenitors, three lines of evidence suggest that β-Catenin likely acts as a WNT mediator in this process. First, we and others have found that Wnt2 and Wnt2b are expressed in the mesenchyme adjacent to the respiratory primordium (Fig. 1 This role of WNT/β-Catenin signaling is unexpected based on recent findings from zebrafish and Xenopus studies. In zebrafish, it was shown that a mutation in Wnt2b leads to a delay/reduction in liver specification with no other morphological defects (33). Our conditional β-Catcko mutants do not allow us to address the requirement for β-Catenin in liver specification in mouse, as Shhcre only recombines in sporadic cells in the liver (Fig. 1 Findings from a recent Xenopus study also appear to differ from our results in mice. In Xenopus, it was shown that WNT-induced activation of β-Catenin signaling in the endoderm leads to reduction of markers for all foregut organs including the lung, liver and pancreas (40). This result is different from the phenotype in β-Catact mouse mutants, and could reflect species-specific control of organ formation. An alternative explanation is that β-Catenin may play different roles at distinct stages of lung development. In the Xenopus study, β-Catenin activation is induced at the gastrula stage during the emergence of the endoderm. However in our study, we manipulate β-Catenin function after the establishment of foregut endoderm. At an even later time window during lung branching morphogenesis, overexpression of a constitutively active β-Catenin-Lef1 fusion protein leads to transformation from lung to intestinal fates (26). This finding further supports context-dependence of β-Catenin function in the foregut. Our data also emphasize the view that this crucial contribution of β-Catenin to respiratory development is dependent on additional players in the foregut. Results from β-Catact mutants show that activated β-Catenin induces Nkx2.1 in the anterior, but not posterior stomach. This boundary coincides with many molecular and cellular differences that have been documented in these two regions of the stomach (41), and suggest that some of these differences may account for distinct responses to activated β-Catenin protein. Furthermore, in the anterior stomach of β-Catact mutants, even though activated β-Catenin induces respiratory progenitor characteristics, it does not direct later steps of lung development, including lung budding morphogenesis and epithelial differentiation. It is likely that additional obligatory partners in the endoderm and/or signals from the mesenchyme are required to implement the remainder of the respiratory program. For example, FGF10 signaling is essential for lung budding morphogenesis (8, 9). Fgf10 is expressed at a low level in the anterior stomach compared to surrounding regions of the mouse foregut (42). This raises the possibility that in the anterior stomach of β-Catact mutants, the amount of FGF10 present may not be sufficient to drive budding following ectopic induction of Nkx2.1. Our findings that β-Catenin is capable of inducing early respiratory progenitor identity, and is required to maintain this identify demonstrate that β-Catenin functions at or near the top of the genetic hierarchy that executes the lung development program. Thus discovery and characterization of the partners and targets of β-Catenin in the context of respiratory initiation will be an informative future direction of research. Methods Generation of β-Catenin Mutants. Mice carrying a conditional loss-of-function allele of β-Catenin (Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem) or a conditional gain-of-function allele of β-Catenin (Ctnnb1tm1Mmt) were mated to mice carrying the Shhcre allele to generate Shhcre/+; Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem/tm2.1Kem (β-Catcko) or Shhcre/+;Ctnnb1tm1Mmt/+ (β-Catact) mutant embryos, respectively (29, 31, 32). Offspring were genotyped using the following PCR primer pairs: for Cre, 5′-TGATGAGGTTCGCAAGAACC-3′ and 5′-CCATGAGTGAACGAACCTGG-3′, product size 420 bp; for Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem, 5′-AAGGTAGAGTGATGAAAGTTGTT-3′ and 5′-CACCATGTCCTCTGTCTATTC-3′, product sizes 324 bp from the Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem allele and 221 bp from the wild-type allele, For Ctnnb1tm1Mmt allele, 5′-GCTGCGTGGACAATGGCTACTCAA-3′ and 5′-GCCATGTCCAACTCCATCAGGTCA-3′, product sizes 525 bp from the Ctnnb1tm1Mmt allele and 300 bp from the wild-type allele. Embryo Isolation and Ohenotype Analyses. Embryos were dissected from time-mated mice, counting noon on the day the vaginal plug was found as E0.5. As Shhcre/+; Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem/+ or Shh+/+;Ctnnb1tm1Mmt/+ littermates were indistinguishable from wild-type embryos, they were used as controls for respective β-Catcko or β-Catact experiments. To assay for cre activity through β–gal expression, the R26R reporter line (30) was introduced into the background of the Shhcre line (29). β–gal activity was detected using a standard protocol. Stained embryos were embedded in JB-4 plastic resin (Polysciences Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sections were prepared at 5 μm and counterstained with 1% eosin. Whole-mount in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes was performed as previously described (43). To determine the extent of β-Catenin inactivation, immunofluorescence staining was performed using a mouse anti-β-Catenin antibody (BD Transduction Laboratories, 1:50 dilution) on paraffin sections (5 μm). Mouse-on-Mouse reagent (Vector Laboratories) was used in the blocking step before addition of antibody. Sections were counterstained with DAPI to label cell nuclei. To determine the extent of programmed cell death in the foregut epithelium, immunofluorescence staining was performed using a rabbit anti-cleaved Caspase-3 antibody (Cell Signaling, 1:500 dilution) to label dying cells and a rat anti-E-Cadherin antibody (Sigma, 1:500 dilution) to label the epithelium. To determine foregut patterning, immunofluorescence staining was performed using a mouse anti-NKX2.1 (also called anti-TTF1, clone 8G7G3/1, Neomarkers, used at 1:100 dilution) and a rabbit anti-SOX2 (Novus Biologicals, used at 1:1,000 dilution) on paraffin sections. To determine FGFR2 expression, a rabbit anti-FGFR2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used at 1:100 dilution. Staining was performed using a recently described protocol (44). Cell Proliferation Assay. Pregnant females received an i.p. injection of 100 μg BrdU (Sigma) per gram bodyweight 1 h before sacrifice. Embryos were fixed, processed and stained as described above. After immunostaining, slides were counterstained with DAPI. For each 20× field of view, the number of BrdU+ nuclei relative to the number of nuclei in the foregut endoderm was calculated. The percentage BrdU+ nuclei between control and mutant was compared using the Student's t test. Results were considered statistically significant if P ≤ 0.05. Acknowledgments. We thank Dr. E. Morrisey and his laboratory for sharing unpublished data; members of the X.S. laboratory and Drs. Caroline Alexander and Grace Boekhoff-Falk for insightful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript; Dr. Terry Yamaguchi (NCI, Maryland) for sharing WNT pathway reagents; Drs. Makoto Mark Taketo (Kyoto University, Kyoto) for sharing the Ctnnb1tm1Mmt mice; Brian Harfe (University of Florida) and Cliff Tabin (Harvard University, Boston) for sharing the Shhcre mice; Dr. Rolf Kemler (Max Planck Institute of Immunology) for sharing the Ctnnb1tm2.1Kem mice; and R. Beddington, S. Bellusci (University of Southern California), K. Kastner (University of Pennsylvania), J. Rubenstein (University of California, San Francisco), and L.T. Williams (Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc., California) for providing plasmids from which RNA in situ probes were prepared. We thank Amber Lashua and Minghui Zhao for technical assistance. This work was supported by David and Lucille Packard Foundation Graduate Scholars Fellowship 2003-24989 (to K.S.H-J.), National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship 2008044659 (to E.T.D.), and National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant National Reseasrch Service Award Postdoctoral Fellowship F32ES014284 (to C.M.V.). This work was supported by Burroughs-Wellcome Career Award 1002361, American Heart Grant 0950041G, and a University of Wisconsin Medical Education Research Committee young investigator award (to X.S.). Footnotes The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. References 1. Kimura S, et al. The T/ebp null mouse: Thyroid-specific enhancer-binding protein is essential for the organogenesis of the thyroid, lung, ventral forebrain, and pituitary. Genes Dev. 1996;10:60–69. [PubMed] 2. Cardoso WV, Lu J. Regulation of early lung morphogenesis: Questions, facts and controversies. Development. 2006;133:1611–1624. [PubMed] 3. Serls AE, Doherty S, Parvatiyar P, Wells JM, Deutsch GH. Different thresholds of fibroblast growth factors pattern the ventral foregut into liver and lung. Development. 2005;132:35–47. [PubMed] 4. Calmont A, et al. An FGF response pathway that mediates hepatic gene induction in embryonic endoderm cells. Dev Cell. 2006;11:339–348. [PubMed] 5. Bellusci S, Grindley J, Emoto H, Itoh N, Hogan BL. Fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) and branching morphogenesis in the embryonic mouse lung. Development. 1997;124:4867–4878. [PubMed] 6. Weaver M, Dunn NR, Hogan BL. Bmp4 and Fgf10 play opposing roles during lung bud morphogenesis. Development. 2000;127:2695–2704. [PubMed] 7. De Moerlooze L, et al. An important role for the IIIb isoform of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in mesenchymal-epithelial signaling during mouse organogenesis. Development. 2000;127:483–492. [PubMed] 8. Min H, et al. Fgf-10 is required for both limb and lung development and exhibits striking functional similarity to Drosophila branchless. Genes Dev. 1998;12:3156–3161. [PubMed] 9. Sekine K, et al. Fgf10 is essential for limb and lung formation. Nat Genet. 1999;21:138–141. [PubMed] 10. Chen F, et al. Inhibition of Tgf beta signaling by endogenous retinoic acid is essential for primary lung bud induction. Development. 2007;134:2969–2979. [PubMed] 11. Lako M, et al. Isolation, characterisation and embryonic expression of WNT11, a gene which maps to 11q13.5 and has possible roles in the development of skeleton, kidney and lung. Gene. 1998;219:101–110. [PubMed] 12. Li C, Xiao J, Hormi K, Borok Z, Minoo P. Wnt5a participates in distal lung morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2002;248:68–81. [PubMed] 13. Rajagopal J, et al. Wnt7b stimulates embryonic lung growth by coordinately increasing the replication of epithelium and mesenchyme. Development. 2008;135:1625–1634. [PubMed] 14. Katoh M, Hirai M, Sugimura T, Terada M. Cloning, expression and chromosomal localization of Wnt-13, a novel member of the Wnt gene family. Oncogene. 1996;13:873–876. [PubMed] 15. Zakin LD, et al. Structure and expression of Wnt13, a novel mouse Wnt2 related gene. Mech Dev. 1998;73:107–116. [PubMed] 16. Moon RT. Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Sci STKE. 2005;271:cm1. [PubMed] 17. Mucenski ML, et al. β-Catenin is required for specification of proximal/distal cell fate during lung morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:40231–40238. [PubMed] 18. Shu W, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling acts upstream of N-myc, BMP4, and FGF signaling to regulate proximal-distal patterning in the lung. Dev Biol. 2005;283:226–239. [PubMed] 19. De Langhe SP, et al. Formation and differentiation of multiple mesenchymal lineages during lung development is regulated by beta-catenin signaling. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1516. [PubMed] 20. Yin Y, et al. An FGF-WNT gene regulatory network controls lung mesenchyme development. Dev Biol. 2008;319:426–436. [PubMed] 21. Li Y, Gordon J, Manley NR, Litingtung Y, Chiang C. Bmp4 is required for tracheal formation: A novel mouse model for tracheal agenesis. Dev Biol. 2008;322:145–155. [PubMed] 22. Bellusci S, Henderson R, Winnier G, Oikawa T, Hogan BL. Evidence from normal expression and targeted misexpression that bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp-4) plays a role in mouse embryonic lung morphogenesis. Development. 1996;122:1693–1702. [PubMed] 23. Monkley SJ, Delaney SJ, Pennisi DJ, Christiansen JH, Wainwright BJ. Targeted disruption of the Wnt2 gene results in placentation defects. Development. 1996;122:3343–3353. [PubMed] 24. Lustig B, et al. Negative feedback loop of Wnt signaling through upregulation of conductin/axin2 in colorectal and liver tumors. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:1184–1193. [PubMed] 25. De Langhe SP, et al. Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) reveals that fibronectin is a major target of Wnt signaling in branching morphogenesis of the mouse embryonic lung. Dev Biol. 2005;277:316–331. [PubMed] 26. Okubo T, Hogan B. Hyperactive Wnt signaling changes the developmental potential of embryonic lung endoderm. J Biol. 2004;3:11. [PubMed] 27. Maretto S, et al. Mapping Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during mouse development and in colorectal tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3299–3304. [PubMed] 28. Pongracz JE, Stockley RA. Wnt signalling in lung development and diseases. Respir Res. 2006;7:15. [PubMed] 29. Harfe BD, et al. Evidence for an expansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities. Cell. 2004;118:517–528. [PubMed] 30. Soriano P. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet. 1999;21:70–71. [PubMed] 31. Brault V, et al. Inactivation of the β-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development. 2001;128:1253–1264. [PubMed] 32. Harada N, et al. Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. EMBO J. 1999;18:5931–5942. [PubMed] 33. Ober EA, Verkade H, Field HA, Stainier DY. Mesodermal Wnt2b signaling positively regulates liver specification. Nature. 2006;442:688–691. [PubMed] 34. Reynolds SD, et al. Conditional stabilization of beta-catenin expands the pool of lung stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1337–1346. [PubMed] 35. Zhang Y, et al. A Gata6-Wnt pathway required for epithelial stem cell development and airway regeneration. Nat Genet. 2008;40:862–870. [PubMed] 36. Brembeck FH, Rosario M, Birchmeier W. Balancing cell adhesion and Wnt signaling, the key role of beta-catenin. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:51–59. [PubMed] 37. Desai TJ, et al. Distinct roles for retinoic acid receptors alpha and beta in early lung morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2006;291:12–24. [PubMed] 38. Molotkov A, Molotkova N, Duester G. Retinoic acid generated by Raldh2 in mesoderm is required for mouse dorsal endodermal pancreas development. Dev Dyn. 2005;232:950–957. [PubMed] 39. Stafford D, Prince VE. Retinoic acid signaling is required for a critical early step in zebrafish pancreatic development. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1215–1220. [PubMed] 40. McLin VA, Rankin SA, Zorn AM. Repression of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the anterior endoderm is essential for liver and pancreas development. Development. 2007;134:2207–2217. [PubMed] 41. Que J, et al. Multiple dose-dependent roles for Sox2 in the patterning and differentiation of anterior foregut endoderm. Development. 2007;134:2521–2531. [PubMed] 42. Nyeng P, Norgaard GA, Kobberup S, Jensen J. FGF10 signaling controls stomach morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2007;303:295–310. [PubMed] 43. Neubuser A, Peters H, Balling R, Martin GR. Antagonistic interactions between FGF and BMP signaling pathways: A mechanism for positioning the sites of tooth formation. Cell. 1997;90:247–255. [PubMed] 44. Yi L, Domyan ET, Lewandoski M, Sun X. Fibroblast growth factor 9 signaling inhibits airway smooth muscle differentiation in mouse lung. Dev Dyn. 2009;238:123–137. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Genes Dev. 1996 Jan 1; 10(1):60-9.
[Genes Dev. 1996]Development. 2006 May; 133(9):1611-24.
[Development. 2006]Development. 2005 Jan; 132(1):35-47.
[Development. 2005]Dev Cell. 2006 Sep; 11(3):339-48.
[Dev Cell. 2006]Development. 1997 Dec; 124(23):4867-78.
[Development. 1997]Development. 2000 Jun; 127(12):2695-704.
[Development. 2000]Development. 2000 Feb; 127(3):483-92.
[Development. 2000]Development. 1997 Dec; 124(23):4867-78.
[Development. 1997]Gene. 1998 Sep 28; 219(1-2):101-10.
[Gene. 1998]Dev Biol. 2002 Aug 1; 248(1):68-81.
[Dev Biol. 2002]Development. 2008 May; 135(9):1625-34.
[Development. 2008]Oncogene. 1996 Aug 15; 13(4):873-6.
[Oncogene. 1996]Development. 1996 Jun; 122(6):1693-702.
[Development. 1996]Development. 1996 Nov; 122(11):3343-53.
[Development. 1996]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Feb; 22(4):1184-93.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Dev Biol. 2005 Jul 1; 283(1):226-39.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Dev Biol. 2005 Jan 15; 277(2):316-31.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Cell. 2004 Aug 20; 118(4):517-28.
[Cell. 2004]Nat Genet. 1999 Jan; 21(1):70-1.
[Nat Genet. 1999]Development. 2006 May; 133(9):1611-24.
[Development. 2006]Development. 2001 Apr; 128(8):1253-64.
[Development. 2001]Genes Dev. 1996 Jan 1; 10(1):60-9.
[Genes Dev. 1996]Development. 2000 Feb; 127(3):483-92.
[Development. 2000]Genes Dev. 1998 Oct 15; 12(20):3156-61.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Nat Genet. 1999 Jan; 21(1):138-41.
[Nat Genet. 1999]Dev Biol. 2005 Jul 1; 283(1):226-39.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Dev Biol. 2008 Jul 15; 319(2):426-36.
[Dev Biol. 2008]EMBO J. 1999 Nov 1; 18(21):5931-42.
[EMBO J. 1999]Nature. 2006 Aug 10; 442(7103):688-91.
[Nature. 2006]Stem Cells. 2008 May; 26(5):1337-46.
[Stem Cells. 2008]Nat Genet. 2008 Jul; 40(7):862-70.
[Nat Genet. 2008]Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006 Feb; 16(1):51-9.
[Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006]Mech Dev. 1998 Apr; 73(1):107-16.
[Mech Dev. 1998]Development. 1996 Nov; 122(11):3343-53.
[Development. 1996]Nature. 2006 Aug 10; 442(7103):688-91.
[Nature. 2006]Dev Biol. 2006 Mar 1; 291(1):12-24.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Dev Dyn. 2005 Apr; 232(4):950-7.
[Dev Dyn. 2005]Curr Biol. 2002 Jul 23; 12(14):1215-20.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Development. 2007 Jun; 134(12):2207-17.
[Development. 2007]J Biol. 2004; 3(3):11.
[J Biol. 2004]Development. 2007 Jul; 134(13):2521-31.
[Development. 2007]Genes Dev. 1998 Oct 15; 12(20):3156-61.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Nat Genet. 1999 Jan; 21(1):138-41.
[Nat Genet. 1999]Dev Biol. 2007 Mar 1; 303(1):295-310.
[Dev Biol. 2007]Cell. 2004 Aug 20; 118(4):517-28.
[Cell. 2004]Development. 2001 Apr; 128(8):1253-64.
[Development. 2001]EMBO J. 1999 Nov 1; 18(21):5931-42.
[EMBO J. 1999]Nat Genet. 1999 Jan; 21(1):70-1.
[Nat Genet. 1999]Cell. 2004 Aug 20; 118(4):517-28.
[Cell. 2004]Cell. 1997 Jul 25; 90(2):247-55.
[Cell. 1997]Dev Dyn. 2009 Jan; 238(1):123-37.
[Dev Dyn. 2009]