|
|
Indian J Plast Surg. 2008 Jul–Dec; 41(2): 110–115. | PMCID: PMC2740506 |
Copyright © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery Use of vascularised cartilage as an additional interposition in temporomandibular ankylosis surgery: Rationale, advantages and potential benefits Mukund Jagannathan, Maksud Devale, Prashantha Kesari, and Siddharth Karanth Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lokmanya Tilak Muncipal Medical College and Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400 022, India This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Context: Surgery for the release of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is a commonly performed procedure. Various interposition materials have been tried with varying success rates. However, none of these procedures attempt to recreate the architecture of the joint as the glenoid surface is usually left raw. Aims: We aimed to use a vascularised cartilage flap and to line the raw surface of the bone to recreate the articular surface of the joint. Settings and Design: There is a rich blood supply in the region of the helical root, based on branches from the Superficial Temporal Artery (STA), which enables the harvest of vascularised cartilage from the helical root for use in the temporomandibular joint. Materials and Methods: Two cases, one adult and the other a child, of unilateral ankylosis were operated upon using this additional technique. The adult patient had a bony segment excised along with a vascularised cartilage flap for lining the glenoid. The child was managed with an interposition graft of costochondral cartilage following the release of the ankylosis, in addition to the vascularised cartilage flap for lining the glenoid. Results: The postoperative mouth opening was good in both the cases with significant reduction in pain. However, the long-term results of this procedure are yet to be ascertained. Conclusions: The vascularised cartilage flap as an additional interposition material in temporomandibular joint surgery enables early and painless mouth-opening with good short-term results. The potential applicability of this flap in various pathologies of the temporomandibular joint is enormous. Keywords: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis, vascularised cartilage flap Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis needs aggressive management consisting of several parts:
- Release of the restraining forces
- Management of the defect created
- Postoperative physiotherapy
While several methods of interposition arthroplasty have been described, there are very few attempts to recreate the ‘milieu interior’ of the joint. We have attempted to address this issue by means of a pedicled, vascularised cartilage flap. The anatomy of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and its supply to the helical root has been well described by Park et al.[ 1] Based on this blood supply through the STA, several authors have described reverse-flow, composite chondrocutaneous flaps for the reconstruction of the eyelid and the nose.[ 2– 5] These clearly indicate the rich blood supply of the region of the helical root based on branches from the STA, which enables the harvest of vascularised cartilage from the helical root for use in the TMJ. If necessary, the temporoparietal fascia (TPF) can be harvested as an extension based on the STA for additional use. This flap is used to line the raw surface of the glenoid fossa in an attempt to provide a cartilaginous surface, against which the condyle can move. By this manoeuvre, we hope that a more physiological joint can be recreated. In this preliminary study, two cases of unilateral ankylosis, one an adult and the other a child, were operated on using this additional technique. The adult patient had a bony segment excised along with a vascularized cartilage flap for lining the glenoid. The child was managed with an interposition graft of costochondral cartilage following the release of ankylosis, in addition to the vascularized cartilage flap for lining the glenoid. The incision for exposure of the TMJ is taken just anterior to the ear, but not deepened. Subdermal dissection is performed posteriorly in the region of the root of the helix, elevating the auricular skin off the cartilage in an extraperichondrial fashion [Figures and ]. The dissection is continued around the free border of the helical rim and into the cymba conchae. The vertical dimension of the harvested cartilage is around 1.5 cm. An adequate width of cartilage is taken and the flap is elevated along with a generous cuff of soft tissue, presumably containing the branches from the STA to the helix [Figures and ]. The skin incision is extended superiorly and anteriorly, and dissection is again performed in the subfollicular plane to expose and harvest a portion of the TPF. The STA is ligated at the upper end and the flap is dissected down till the level of the tragus [Figures and ]. Protecting the pedicle, the incision is deepened through the deep temporal and parotido- masseteric fascia, which are reflected anteriorly (the technique of subfascial exposure of the TMJ) till the abnormal pathology is delineated. The ankylosis is dealt with in a standard fashion, creating a gap followed by a coronoidectomy. Masseter release and soft tissue release complete the initial procedure. The vascularized cartilage flap showing good bleeding from the surface [] is then placed in the glenoid with the cartilage cup facing downwards. Fibrin glue is used to retain the flap in position, which is further reinforced with a couple of stitches near the root of the zygoma. The costochondral graft (if indicated) is fixed to the ramus. The condylar end should abut comfortably against the cartilage cup [Figures and ] and the mouth should be repeatedly opened and closed to ensure that the interposed cartilage is stable even during movement of the condyle. ( Video clip can be seen on www.ijps.org) The TPF can be used to wrap around the upper end of the graft as an additional vascular bolster for the cartilage end of the graft; closure is routine. Postoperative jaw opening exercises were instituted after 48 hours. The adult patient has been on regular follow-up for six months and the child for a month as this article is being drafted. The postoperative recovery has been uneventful in both the cases. A significant finding was a reduction in pain on opening of the mouth in the early postoperative period. Both the patients have adequate and stable mouth opening [Figures and ]. There is no significant deformity of the ears; the long-term results are to be ascertained. Management of the defect following resection of the ankylosed joint is the central feature of the surgical management of TMJ ankylosis. Gap arthroplasty, a common method of treatment, has many disadvantages. In a controlled study in sheep, Matsuura et al.[ 6] showed that even after three months, the residual fibrous tissue in the gap is poorly organised and has deposition of bone within it. They concluded that the picture simulates a fibrous reankylosis, and that the mouth opening gradually reduces over a period of time. Cheung et al.[ 7] performed gap arthroplasty along with distraction to simultaneously achieve lengthening of the ramus, along with transport of the pseudocondyle into the glenoid fossa. In their series of five cases, they showed adequate mouth opening after one year, and postulated that the disorganized fibrous tissue in the gap was compressed into an organized layer, simulating the disc of the joint. Roychowdhury et al.[ 8] have shown a series of 50 cases treated by gap arthroplasty and intensive postoperative jaw exercises to have a recurrence of ankylosis in only two cases. However, interposition arthroplasty appears to be the mainstay of treatment and various materials have been used. Acrylic,[ 9, 10] dermis fat graft,[ 11] muscle or myofascial flaps,[ 12] auricular cartilage (nonvascularized),[ 13] resected bony material,[ 14, 15] and costochondral grafts in different forms[ 16– 18] have all been used with varying degrees of success. Costochondral grafts have been shown to adaptively grow with downward growth of the maxilla and mandible, thus maintaining vertical height. Even the buccal pad of fat has been used as an interposition.[ 19] However, in all these techniques, no attention is paid to the true lining of the glenoid cavity with a suitable material. The role of the articular disc was stressed and several authors have repositioned the disc to act as a cushion for the condyle.[ 20– 22] They have stated that this manoeuvre goes a long way in preventing reankylosis and have demonstrated consistent long-term results. In fact, Takaishi et al.[ 23] have conducted a study using nonvascularised auricular cartilage in sheep. Histological examination of the cartilage after three months revealed a viable cartilage with adequate joint space between the cartilage and the glenoid. We believe that one of the inadequately addressed issues in TMJ ankylosis management is the providing of a vascular ‘cushion’ to line the raw surface of the glenoid following resection of the ankylosed mass. This has the following advantages:
- Provides a cartilage lining for the condylar remnant or the graft to move against.
- Augments the vertical height of the ramus.
- Reduces the pain of movement in the immediate postoperative period.
In addition, there may be some potential benefits:
- Additional cartilage deposition in response to stress as the cartilage is covered with perichondrium on both sides and retains its vascularity.
- Additional vascularity provided to the costochondral graft by the TPF wrapped around it.
However, this will require a long-term study regarding the fate of such vascularised cartilage flaps. Although the donor site morbidity is minimal, [] there is an increase in operative time of around 45 minutes, and it cannot be used in recurrent cases where the delicate vasculature supplying the root of the helix may have been damaged. The vascularised cartilage flap as an additional interposition material in TMJ surgery is a useful addition. It has some tangible benefits and has enormous potential. The use of this technique can be extended to all cases of TMJ reconstruction following trauma, ablative surgery, or craniofacial microsomia. A long-term evaluation of these patients is needed to ascertain whether these potential advantages are realised. 1. Park C, Lineaweaver WC, Rumly TO, Buncke HJ. Arterial supply of the anterior ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:38. [PubMed] 2. Pascone M, Papa G. The reverse auricular flap for the reconstruction of extended defects of the lower eyelid. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:806–11. [PubMed] 3. Koshima L, Urushibara K, Okuyama H, Moriguchi T. Ear helix flap for reconstruction of total loss of the upper eyelid. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:314–6. [PubMed] 4. Bakhach J, Conde A, Demiri E, Baudet J. The reverse auricular flap: A new flap for nose reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1280–8. [PubMed] 5. Parkhouse N, Evans D. Recontruction of the ala of the nose using a composite free flap from the pinna. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38:306. [PubMed] 6. Matsuura H, Miyamoto N, Ogi K, Kurita AN Goss. The effect of gap arthroplasty on temporomandibular joint ankylosis: An experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:431–7. [PubMed] 7. Cheung LK, Lo J. The long-term effect of transport distraction in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1003–9. [PubMed] 8. Roychoudhury A, Parkash H, Trikha A. Functional restoration by gap arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A report of 50 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87:166–9. [PubMed] 9. Sawhney CP. Bony ankylosis of temporomandibular joint: Follow-up of 70 patients treated with arthroplasty and acrylic spacer interposition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77:29–40. [PubMed] 10. Erdem E, Alkan A. The use of acrylic marbles for interposition arthroplasty in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: Follow-up of 47 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:32–6. [PubMed] 11. Dimitroulis G. The interpositional dermis-fat graft in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33:755–60. [PubMed] 12. Turco M, Di Cosola M, Faccioni F, Cortelazzi R. Treatment of severe bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis in adults-our protocol. Minerva Stomatol. 2007;56:181–90. [PubMed] 13. Lello GE. Surgical correction of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1990;18:19–26. [PubMed] 14. YongLong H, Xiaoming G, Xinhua F, Yilin W. Modified coronoid process grafts combined with sagittal split osteotomy for treatment of bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:11–8. [PubMed] 15. Gunaseelan R. Condylar reconstruction in extensive ankylosis of temporomandibular joint in adults using resected segment as autograft: A new technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:405–7. [PubMed] 16. Posnik JC, Goldstein JA. Surgical management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in paediatric population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:791–8. [PubMed] 17. Güzel MZ, Arslan H, Saraç M. Mandibular condyle reconstruction with inlay application of autogenous costochondral graft after condylectomy: Cerrahpaşas technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:615–20. [PubMed] 18. Donkor P, Acheampong AO. Intra-articular ramus ostectomy combined with costochondral grafting for the treatment of recurrent ankylosis of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44:497–500. [PubMed] 19. Rattan V. A simple technique for use of buccal pad of fat in temporomandibular joint reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1447–51. [PubMed] 20. Li Z, Li ZB, Li JR. Surgical management of posttraumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis by functional restoration with disk repositioning in children. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1311. [PubMed] 21. Li Z, Li ZB, Shang ZJ, Zhao JH, Dong YJ. Potential role of disc repositioning in preventing postsurgical recurrence of traumatogenic temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A retrospective review of 17 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:219–23. [PubMed] 22. Zhang Y, He DM. Clinical investigation of early post-traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis and the role of repositioning discs in treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:1096–101. [PubMed] 23. Takaishi M, Kurita K, Matsuura H, Goss AN. Effect of auricular cartilage graft in the surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: An animal study using sheep. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:198–204. [PubMed]
|
This article has been 
