• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2739015
NIHMSID: NIHMS139348

Current management of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, human monocytic ehrlichiosis and Ehrlichia ewingii ehrlichiosis

Abstract

Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii are emerging tick-borne pathogens and are the causative agents of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, human monocytic ehrlichiosis and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis, respectively. Collectively, these are referred to as human ehrlichioses. These obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens of the family Anaplasmataceae are transmitted by Ixodes spp. or Amblyomma americanum ticks and infect peripherally circulating leukocytes to cause infections that range in clinical spectra from asymptomatic seroconversion to mild, severe or, in rare instances, fatal disease. This review describes: the ecology of each pathogen; the epidemiology, clinical signs and symptoms of the human diseases that each causes; the choice methods for diagnosing and treating human ehrlichioses; recommendations for patient management; and is concluded with suggestions for potential future research.

Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilum, anaplasmosis, diagnosis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingii, human ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, human monocytic ehrlichiosis, treatment

Participation in outdoor activities during months when tick activity is high and human encroachment on areas endemic for ticks have increased the potential for exposure to zoonotic pathogens that cycle between ticks and mammalian reservoir hosts, and have led to the emergence of several tick-borne diseases, including ehrlichioses, in the human population. The term ‘ehrlichiosis’ is a generic name ascribed to infections caused by members of the family Anaplasmataceae, which consists of obligate intracellular bacteria that replicate within the confines of host cell-derived vacuoles in their mammalian host cells. Five Anaplasmataceae members can infect humans, but only three of them – Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia ewingii – have been sufficiently investigated and are the subjects of this review. In the 1990s, each of these bacterial pathogens was first recognized as an etiologic agent of human disease. E. chaffeensis infects peripherally circulating monocytes to cause human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME; Table 1) [1]. E. ewingii, which was originally shown to infect peripheral blood neutrophils of dogs to cause canine granulocytic ehrlichiosis, causes a similar disease in humans referred to as E. ewingii ehrlichiosis [2]. A. phagocytophilum also infects neutrophils to cause human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) [3]. A. phagocytophilum has long been recognized as a veterinary pathogen and was originally ascribed to two separate Ehrlichia species. The bacterium infects ruminant neutrophils to cause tick-borne fever and was referred to as Ehrlichia phagocytophila [4]. Likewise, it infects horses to cause equine granulocytic ehrlichiosis and was designated as Ehrlichia equi [5]. The first human infection was deemed ‘human granulocytic ehrlichiosis’ (HGE) and the bacterium was generically named the ‘agent of HGE’ [3]. In 2001, taxonomic reclassification grouped E. equi, E. phagocytophila and the HGE agent into the single species, A. phagocytophilum [6]. As the revised nomenclature continues to be accepted, HGA is the preferred name to describe human A. phagocytophilum infection. Ehrlichia canis, which is a bacterium that causes chronic and life-threatening infections of dogs, has been shown to infect humans [7,8]. Very little is known regarding interactions of this pathogen with human hosts. Indeed, the patient for whom E. canis infection was first confirmed showed no clinical or laboratory evidence of disease [8], and only recently has E. canis infection been linked to disease in humans [9]. Because the role of E. canis as a pathogen of humans remains relatively unexplored, it will not be discussed further. Since human ehrlichioses can be debilitating or even fatal, early diagnosis is paramount for effective treatment. This review summarizes the ecology of A. phagocytophilum, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii, as well as the epidemiology of the human diseases that they cause, and the clinical signs and symptoms associated with each infection. It also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic method and treatment regimen applied to ehrlichial diseases. Guidelines for obtaining clinical clues to properly diagnose human ehrlichioses and patient management are discussed. The bulk of the review focuses on A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis as they and the diseases they cause have been studied considerably more than E. ewingii and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis.

Table 1
Overview of the three most common causes of human ehrlichiosis.

Ecology & epidemiology

Ehrlichia chaffeensis resides primarily in the southeastern, south-central and mid-Atlantic USA where its vector, the lone-star tick Amblyomma americanum, is endemic [10]. Most cases reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are from Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Arkansas and Maryland [11]. E. chaffeensis has been found in 5–15% of A. americanum ticks in 14 American states [12]. There is a lower prevalence of E. chaffeensis in nymphal ticks than adults [13]. There is no evidence for transovarial transmission of the pathogen, but trans-stadial transmission has been demonstrated in the laboratory [14]. The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is the principal reservoir for E. chaffeensis [15] in the USA, although it is maintained by a diverse range of wild and domestic animals. E. chaffeensis DNA has been detected in the peripheral blood of Brazilian marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) in southeast Brazil and spotted deer (Cervus nippon) in Korea and Japan [1618]. Otherwise, the worldwide distribution of E. chaffeensis in nature is relatively unknown.

In 1987, Maeda and colleagues published the index case of HME [7]. The patient was from Michigan and had travelled to Arkansas in late March 1986, where ticks had bitten him. In mid-April, he became critically ill and was hospitalized. He presented with fever and confusion and developed anemia and thrombocytopenia. The symptoms resolved and hematologic parameters returned to normal following treatment with doxycycline. Intravacuolar inclusions of bacteria were identified in monocytes of a peripheral blood smear and the etiologic agent was presumed to be E. canis. Questions were raised as to whether E. canis was the causative agent [19]. In 1991, Anderson and colleagues isolated a monocytotropic bacterium from a soldier stationed at Fort Chaffee Army Base in northwestern Arkansas [1]. The bacterium’s 16S rRNA gene sequence was 98.2% identical to that of E. canis. The agent was named E. chaffeensis and delineated as the etiologic agent of HME. A total of 3408 HME cases have been reported to the CDC over the past 6 years (2003 through to the end of December 2008; Figure 1) with the greatest number of cases (837) occurring in 2008 [20]. The majority (90–93%) of HME cases occur between April and September, which coincides with peak levels of A. americanum feeding activity on humans [21,22]. The median age for HME is 50 years with approximately 59% of patients being male [23]. While human ehrlichial infections ascribed to E. chaffeensis have been reported in other countries including Mali, Korea and Peru [2426], these reports relied on either serological tests or indirect immunofluorescence assays that lacked the specificity to distinguish between E. chaffeensis and antigenically related bacterial species that would induce cross-reacting antibodies.

Figure 1
Number of human monocytic ehrlichiosis, Ehrlichia ewingii ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis and undetermined human ehrlichiosis cases per year (2003–2008)

A. phagocytophilum is naturally maintained in a zoonotic cycle between tick vectors of the Ixodes persulcatus complex and mammalian reservoir hosts. In the USA, this vector–vertebrate host cycle includes Ixodes scapularis in the eastern and mid-western states, and Ixodes pacificus and Ixodes spinipalpis in western coastal and mountain areas, respectively [27]. Approximately 10–50% of Ixodes scapularis ticks in the USA are infected with A. phagocytophilum [28,29]. The vectors for transmitting the bacterium to humans in Europe and Asia are I. ricinus and I. persulcatus, respectively [30,31]. A. phagocytophilum has been detected in I. ricinus ticks from most European countries including Italy [3234], the UK [35], France [36,37], Slovenia [38], Switzerland [39,40], The Netherlands [41,42], Germany [43,44], Bulgaria [45], Spain [46], Russia [47] and Poland [4850], with the prevalence of infection ranging from 2 to 45%. The bacterium has been found in Ixodes trianguliceps in the UK and in Ixodes ventalloi in Portugal [5154]. However, I. trianguliceps probably does not play a role in transmitting A. phagocytophilum to humans or domestic animals, as its nidicolous activity is likely to restrict it to small rodent reservoirs. Likewise, I. ventalloi infests a variety of small rodents and lizards, but has not been shown to feed on humans [53,54]. The Ixodes spp. ticks that transmit HGA are also vectors for the causative agents of other human diseases, including Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease) [55], Babesia microti (babesiosis) [56] and tick-borne encephalitis virus [57]. Coinfection by A. phagocytophilum and one or more of these agents has been confirmed in both humans and laboratory animals [5860]. A. phagocytophilum is not transmitted transovarially from an adult female tick to her progeny [14] and ticks must therefore acquire the bacterium through a blood meal. Adult Ixodes spp. ticks are active from March through June and October through December in the northern USA. Nymph activity is highest from May through September, while larval activity is highest June through October. The southern USA sees all stages active from November through May [13]. In Europe and Asia, all stages of I. ricinus are active April through June and in the winter months [13]. The white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) is a prominent reservoir of A. phagocytophilum in the USA [61]. Non-Peromyscus reservoirs in the USA include white-tailed deer, (O. virginianus), raccoons (Procyon lotor), Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana), Sciurus spp. (squirrels), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) and chipmunks (Tamias senex) [6269]. Evidence is emerging that A. phagocytophilum strains carried by some of these reservoirs are nonpathogenic for humans [66,70]; and a definitive role for white-tailed deer in maintaining human-infective A. phagocytophilum is being re-examined [71]. In Europe, small mammals, including the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus), bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), common shrew (Sorex aranus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), foxes (Vulpes vulpes), wild boar (Sus scrofa), as well as horses, cattle, sheep and dogs are important reservoirs [39,72,73].

Human granulocytic anaplasmosis was first defined in the USA in 1994 [3] when it was determined that 12 patients presented with peripheral granulocytes harboring vacuolar inclusions of organisms resembling E. chaffeensis. As such, the disease was originally deemed HGE [74]. A total of 3637 HGA cases in the USA were reported to the CDC from 2003 through 2008, with 2007 seeing the most cases (834 cases; Figure 1). Despite the steady increases in reported HGA and HME cases, the true incidence and prevalence of each disease is probably under-represented. Indeed, active surveillance rates are as high as 24–58 HGA cases per 100,000 individuals in Connecticut [75] and the upper midwest [76] and 330–414 HME cases per 100,000 individuals in Tennessee [77] and southeastern Missouri [78]. Seroprevalence studies show rates of 14.9% for HGA in northwestern Wisconsin [79] and 12.5% for HME in Tennessee [80].

As HGA is not as yet a reported disease in Europe, data regarding incidence and prevalence are dependent upon laboratory-confirmed cases reported in clinical publications. The first serologic evidence of human exposure to A. phagocytophilum was reported in Switzerland in 1995 [81]. The first confirmed HGA case was diagnosed in Slovenia in 1997 [82]. Subsequent cases of HGA or A. phagocytophilum seropositivity have since been reported in The Netherlands [83], Spain [84], Sweden [85], Norway [86], Croatia [87], Poland [88], Slovenia [58] and Greece [89], with the majority of cases occurring June through August (73%) [30]. Just over half of the patients were males (53%), which is similar to the findings in the USA [90,91]. Several of these studies assessed either the percentage of humans that carry A. phagocytophilum antibodies or I. ricinus ticks positive for A. phagocytophilum DNA and collectively indicate that seroprevalence of anti-A. phagocytophilum antibodies in Europe is relatively high (up to 15.4%) considering the low infection rates of I. ricinus ticks (0.6–6%) with A. phagocytophilum in the same regions. This could be due to a large number of humans being frequently bitten by infected ticks and remaining seropositive for a number of years or problems with the detection methods used [92]. An A. phagocytophilum strain that is putatively nonpathogenic for humans was recently identified in I. ricinus ticks in Spain [93]. Thus, I. ricinus-mediated inoculation of such nonpathogenic strains into humans could conceivably elicit production of antibodies that would confirm seropositivity for exposure to A. phagocytophilum. The majority of the above European studies [30,8189] calculated no significant difference in seroprevalence between males and females or in age ranges. Some studies reported regional differences in human seroprevalence between rural and urban areas [89]. As would be expected, the majority of the studies determined that people living in rural areas in close contact with habitats favorable to ticks or individuals working closely with animals were more likely to be seropositive for A. phagocytophilum antibodies. However, a study conducted on the island of Crete, Greece, determined that not only was the human seroprevalence higher than in most other European countries (24.1%), but also there was no significant difference in the seroprevalences of people living in rural and urban areas. This was attributed to the Cretan culture where livestock farming is embraced as a way of life for both rural and urban dwellers [89].

Ehrlichia ewingii was first described in 1992 when it was attributed to be the etiologic agent of canine granulocytic ehrlichiosis [94]. In 1999, PCR amplification and subsequent sequence analysis of peripheral blood leukocytes of patients with suspected ehrlichiosis revealed the causative agent to be E. ewingii for four cases that occurred in Missouri between May and August [2]. Similar to E. chaffeensis, E. ewingii is transmitted by the lone-star tick [95]. In 2000, a field study in North Carolina put the prevalence of tick infection with E. ewingii at less than 1% for adults and 0.4% for nymphs [96]. DNA has also been amplified from lone-star ticks collected in Florida and Missouri where prevalence in adult ticks is 1.6 and 5.4%, respectively [95]. Transstadial passage of E. ewingii and successful transmission of this pathogen among dogs by A. americanum has been demonstrated experimentally [97]. E. ewingii DNA has been isolated from wild white-tailed deer in Arkansas, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina [98]. As the white-tailed deer is a key host to all stages of the lone-star tick and is also the principal reservoir for E. chaffeensis [10,15], E. ewingii probably exhibits similar ecological dynamics to those of E. chaffeensis. Since becoming a reported disease in the USA in 2008, only nine cases of E. ewingii ehrlichiosis have been reported to the CDC [20], partly owing to the difficulty in definitive identification of this infection. Despite the fact that the numbers of E. ewingii and E. chaffeensis infections in white-tailed deer and domestic dogs are comparable, confirmed cases of HME far out number confirmed cases of human illness due to E. ewingii. This may be attributed to E. ewingii possibly causing a milder illness than E. chaffeensis, particularly in individuals with no underlying immune-suppressing conditions [95].

In 2008, there were 69 cases of ehrlichiosis of undetermined etiology in the USA for which clinical criteria supporting either Ehrlichia spp. or A. phagocytophilum infection had been met, and for which there were insufficient diagnostic data to definitively classify the causative agent. For example, while morulae may have been identified in white blood cells, other supportive laboratory results would have been absent, or serologic tests could not discern between E. chaffeensis and A. phagocytophilum infection [20].

The past few years have seen evidence of blood transfusion, nosocomial and perinatal transmission of A. phagocytophilum. In November 2007, the Minnesota State Department of Health was contacted regarding a patient hospitalized with HGA who had previously undergone multiple blood transfusions [99]. The patient acknowledged that he had travelled to an area endemic for Ixodes spp. ticks 3 weeks prior, but neither spent a lot of time outside nor recalled having a tick bite. Upon screening samples of the 59 blood donors to this patient for evidence of A. phagocytophilum infection, a sample from a 64-year-old female donor tested positive. The donor had spent time in wooded areas of northeastern Minnesota where HGA is endemic, but did not recall having been bitten by a tick and had no history of fever in the month leading up to her blood donation or afterwards. In 2008, nine people were diagnosed with HGA based on PCR detection of A. phagocytophilum DNA in peripheral blood and maximum antibody titers less than or equal to 256 at a primary-care hospital in the Anhui province of China [100]. Neither blood smears nor blood cultures were performed for diagnosis of A. phagocytophilum infection. The nine cases were among 39 healthcare workers and relatives, none of whom suffered tick bites but had contact with an index patient within 12 h of her death from suspected fatal HGA while she experienced extensive hemorrhage and underwent endotracheal intubation. Because routine blood and body fluid precautions were probably not strictly adhered to in this case, it suggests that there is a risk of nosocomial transmission of HGA infection in situations where proper blood and body fluid precautions are not followed. This may be the first evidence of human-to-human transmission of HGA and the first case of HGA in China. However, Krause and Wormser caution that this report be considered preliminary because, even though it fulfils the case definition of HGA, it lacks diagnostic certainty as A. phagocytophilum cultures from blood were not attempted [101]. Transplacental transmission of B. burgdorferi is well documented [102]. Therefore, it is not surprising that Horowitz and colleagues consider this route of transmission of HGA in the case of a pregnant woman near term in which A. phagocytophilum was transmitted perinatally to her infant [103]. Because the placenta and umbilical cord blood had been discarded by the time the infant became ill, transplacental transmission could not be confirmed. It is uncertain whether more serious complications could have arisen had the infection occurred earlier in the pregnancy, as stillbirth and abortion are consequences of A. phagocytophilum infection in sheep and cattle [104,105].

Clinical manifestations & laboratory findings

Onset of both HGA and HME occurs 5–21 days after receiving a bite from an infected tick [91]. HGA ranges in severity from asymptomatic seroconversion to a mild or severe febrile illness. In rare instances, severe disease can result in organ failure or death. Nonspecific signs and symptoms including acute onset of fever, headache, malaise and myalgias are typical, even in severe infection [11,106,107]. Less common symptoms include nausea, abdominal pain, diarrhea and cough [106]. Laboratory findings can include leukopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and elevated serum levels of hepatic enzymes [11,106,107]. Clinical manifestations and laboratory findings reported for HGA cases in Europe and the USA are similar except that the disease appears to be milder and to resolve sooner in European cases, even in the absence of antibiotic treatment [106]. Leukopenia and impaired neutrophil function with HGA could promote susceptibility to secondary and opportunistic infections [90]. Other possible contributing factors include underlying diseases and hospitalization [27]. Most patients’ symptoms usually resolve within 30 days, even without antibiotic treatment [108]. However, various complications may be evident at the time of presentation or may appear several days or longer after onset. Such complications can include peripheral neuropathies and CNS complications and are mostly associated with increasing age, immunosuppression, chronic inflammatory illness, underlying malignant disease or clinical severity of HGA [109]. Nearly half of patients with severe HGA require hospitalization with 17% requiring admittance to intensive care [90].

Similar to HGA, HME and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis present as undifferentiated febrile illnesses characterized by fever, chills, headache, myalgias and arthralgia. The most common additional symptoms associated with HME are coughing, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, anorexia and abdominal pain. Ataxia and dyspnea are less common [10]. A nonspecific skin rash is seen in less than 10% of adults at the time of presentation, though approximately 30% will develop a rash within the first week of illness. A skin rash is more frequent in children with HME [10]. There is a greater likelihood of rash and nausea with HME than E. ewingii infection [21]. Laboratory abnormalities for HME and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and elevated hepatic transaminase levels [21,80,110,111], although they are generally less severe for E. ewingii ehrlichiosis [95]. Among patients with HME, 60–85% are hospitalized and 15% develop moderate-to-severe illness. Complications with HME can include meningoencephalitits, acute renal failure, myocarditis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy [10,21]. Patients with HIV or other forms of immunocompromise can develop a toxic shock-like syndrome following E. chaffeensis or E. ewingii infection. Fewer complications arise in immunocompromised patients infected with E. ewingii when compared with those infected with E. chaffeensis [112].

Fatalities associated with HGA occur in less than 1% of infections and are usually due to opportunistic infections, whereas 3% of HME cases are fatal with the deaths occurring most commonly in immunosuppressed individuals who develop respiratory distress syndrome, hepatitis or opportunistic nosocomial infections [12,90,109,112]. No fatal cases have been reported for E. ewingii infection.

Diagnosis

Accurate diagnosis of many tick-borne diseases is hampered owing to similar clinical manifestations, overlapping geographic distributions and shared vectors. Also, patients are often unable to recall having been bitten by a tick. Therefore, after determining that a patient has been exposed to areas typical of high tick activity, a tick-borne infection should be considered. Laboratory confirmation can be carried out using a number of molecular microbiological and serological techniques.

Examination of peripheral blood smears

The quickest diagnostic method after onset of disease is via microscopic examination of Wright- or Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smears. The trained eye should look for intravacuolar bacterial inclusions termed morulae (Latin for mulberry), which stain dark blue or purple and are stippled in appearance (Figure 2A & C). Morulae detected in neutrophils are indicative of infection by A. phagocytophilum or E. ewingii, while detection in monocytes delineates infection by E. chaffeensis. This test should be carried out within a week of disease onset, as sensitivity is highest at this time (Table 2) [113]. Blood samples must be taken prior to administering doxycycline therapy since morulae disappear from the blood within 24–72 h after treatment begins [10,27]. During the first week of infection, the sensitivity of this assay is 25–75% for detecting A. phagocytophilum and 2–38% for detecting E. chaffeensis and declines thereafter [114]. Sensitivity data for E. ewingii detection are not available. A limitation of this assay is that it requires a well-trained microscopist. For instance, prolonged examination is often required to accurately detect A. phagocytophilum morulae, as they can be present in less than 0.1% of neutrophils. Also, the trained eye should be able to distinguish common intracellular inclusions and artefacts on blood smears. Such phenomena include crystal stain artefacts (crystalloid deposits outside or on top of cells), bacterial contamination of the stain solutions (cocci or bacilli that are also present on control slides), Döhle bodies, toxic granulation and platelets overlying leukocytes [27].

Figure 2
Examples of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis morulae in peripheral blood smears and tissue culture cells
Table 2
Preferred laboratory diagnostic methods by interval after onset of illness with human granulocytic anaplasmosis and human monocytic ehrlichiosis.

Amplification of bacterial DNA

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently the most sensitive tool for detecting A. phagocytophilum or E. chaffeensis during acute infection. After the first week, the bacteremic phase of infection rapidly wanes, thereby limiting the effectiveness of PCR as a diagnostic technique (Table 2) [113]. Sensitivity is 60–85% for detecting E. chaffeensis DNA [77] and 67–90% for detecting A. phagocytophilum DNA [103]. At present, PCR is the only specific diagnostic test available for E. ewingii infection as cultureisolation of this organism has yet to be achieved and E. ewingii and A. phagocytophilum morulae are indistinguishable. Multiplex or real-time PCR can reduce the time spent waiting for results by combining the detection of two or more ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis agents into a single experiment or obviate the need for time consuming gel analysis steps, respectively [115,116].

In vitro cultivation of bacteria in cell culture

Recovery of E. chaffeensis and A. phagocytophilum in antibiotic-free mammalian cell culture can also be used to definitively diagnose infection. A. phagocytophilum is usually cultivated in the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL-60 [117,118] by direct inoculation of cell cultures with peripheral blood from a potentially infected patient. The bacteria develop within vacuoles to form morulae in the cytoplasm of infected cells, which can be detected using Wright or Giemsa staining (Figure 2B & D). Intracellular organisms can be visualized as early as 5 days postinoculation or can remain undetectable for more than 2 weeks. The canine histiocytic cell line DH82 is usually employed for culturing E. chaffeensis [77]. E. chaffeensis morulae can be visible in susceptible cells from 2 to 36 days postinoculation [10]. E. ewingii has yet to be successfully cultured in the laboratory. Owing to the antibiotic-free environment needed to grow these intracellular bacteria and requisite training in cell culture techniques, only a few specialized laboratories perform this task. Another limitation of this method is that it can take up to 2 weeks or longer for a positive result. As such, cultivation is not generally available or useful for clinical diagnosis at the time of active disease.

Serodiagnosis

Serological detection of antibodies in patient serum or plasma by the indirect immunofluorescence assay is the most frequently used assay for clinical diagnosis [119]. However, it requires sufficient time for antibodies to develop towards the infectious agent. Therefore, although the most sensitive and widely used diagnostic method, it is not the most rapid or practical, as an antibody response has not usually developed at the time a patient presents with active disease. The assay employs the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies, together or separately, that are reactive against A. phagocytophilum- or E. chaffeensis-infected tissue culture cells or purified bacteria fixed to glass slides [91]. Sensitivity is high 2–4 weeks following disease onset compared with a few days for PCR, blood smear microscopy and cell culture (Table 2). A diagnosis of A. phagocytophilum or E. chaffeensis infection is confirmed by a fourfold increase in antibody titer between acute and convalescent sera or a seroconversion to a titer of 128 or higher [108,120]. However, the Consensus Approach for Ehrlichiosis Task Force has suggested that patients with single titers of 64 and 128 be considered probable cases of HME and those with single titers greater than 256 be considered confirmed HME cases [120]. Moreover, seropositivity against E. chaffeensis or A. phagocytophilum, while waning in titer, often lasts for months and sometimes years after initial exposure [108]. Thus, an antibody titer must be considered in the context of other clinical evidence of infection and should not be the sole criteria for a diagnosis. E. ewingii has never been cultured in vitro; therefore, serological diagnosis is not presently feasible. Sensitivity ranges from 82–100% and 88–90%, respectively, for IgG antibodies against A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis [119,121], and 27–37% and 44%, respectively, for IgM [78,119]. Specificity studies have only been conducted for A. phagocytophilum, for which the range is 83–100% [91]. Nonspecificity can occur owing to cross-reactivity among A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis antibodies [91]. Likewise, indirect immunofluorescence assays cannot distinguish between E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii antibodies [2,122]. As such, it is likely that some patients diagnosed as having HME based on indirect immunofluorescence antibody results may have actually been afflicted with E. ewingii ehrlichiosis. Despite the efficacy of serologic diagnosis of HGA or HME, a number of conditions can cause false-positive serologic test results. These include Rocky Mountain spotted fever, typhus, Q fever, brucellosis, Lyme disease, Epstein–Barr virus and autoimmune disorders that produce autoantibodies such as rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and antiplatelet antibodies [91].

Patient history

Early clinical manifestations associated with HME, HGA and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis may resemble nonspecific symptoms and signs of other infectious and noninfectious diseases, which can obfuscate correct diagnosis. It is therefore important for primary care clinicians who will probably be first to evaluate such patients, such as general practicioners, pediatricians, internists or emergency room physicians, to obtain a thorough clinical history. Important clinical historical features include: recent tick bite or exposure; travel to endemic areas for tick-borne diseases; and the presentation of similar illness in family members, coworkers or pet dogs. A patient’s history might reveal outdoor activities in areas likely to be tick-infested (high grass and/or low brush) or such areas that border roads, trails, yards, or fields between the months of April to September. In endemic areas, even recreation in grassy yards or contact with the family dog poses a risk. Most patients will not recall being bitten by a tick perhaps because of the tick’s small size or because it attached at a nonobvious spot. Thus, the absence of confirmed tick exposure should not exclude diagnosis of HME, HGA or E. ewingii ehrlichiosis [11].

Knowledge of the endemic regions for human ehrlichioses is important, especially for clinicians practicing in areas where the incidence of these diseases is low. A history of recent travel from an endemic area, especially if the patient participated in outdoor activities in an area likely to be tick-infested, should warrant suspicion of an ehrlichial or other tick-borne illness [11]. Temporal and geographically related clustering of human ehrlichioses can occur. Indeed, clusters of HME among residents of a golfing community and soldiers on field maneuvers have been reported [80,123]. Thus, it is prudent to consider a human ehrlichiosis in addition to a communicable infection as a possible diagnosis for family members, coworkers or individuals frequenting a common area that present with a similar illness, especially in areas endemic for, or for people that have recently travelled to areas endemic for, human ehrlichioses [11].

Patient management

Assessing clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory and diagnostic tests, and a thorough patient history will collectively aid clinicians in formulating a differential diagnosis and treatment plan. A patient presenting with acute febrile illness who otherwise feels well, has an unrevealing history and physical examination, and has normal laboratory findings might warrant reassessment in 24 h if the patient fails to improve [11]. If laboratory testing of a patient with a history of probable exposure to ticks in a region endemic for a human ehrlichiosis agent reveals leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and/or metabolic abnormalities, then the clinician should consider obtaining PCR and blood cultures for likely pathogens including specific serologic tests [11]. In addition, the clinician should initiate antibiotic therapy. The onset of HGA, HME or E. ewingii ehrlichiosis can be rapid and has the potential for severe debilitating or even fatal outcomes, particularly in those that are already immunosuppressed [10,11,107]. Accordingly, antibiotic therapy should be started as soon as either infection is suspected even before laboratory diagnosis has been confirmed [11,107]. Blood samples for diagnosis should be taken before treatment begins since doxycycline therapy rapidly reduces the detected quantities of infected cells and bacterial DNA. Certain HGA, HME or E. ewingii ehrlichiosis patients can be treated as outpatients with oral medication, particularly if a reliable caregiver will be present and the patient is compliant with follow-up assessment and treatment [11].

At least 50% of patients with HME or HGA are hospitalized to rule out life-threatening conditions and to manage the disease [10,91]. Clinical indications that would prompt hospital admittance include immunocompromise, pain management, confusion, abnormal spinal fluid findings, infiltrates on chest radiographs, hypotension/shock or acute organ failure [11]. Approximately 3% of HME and 0.5–1% of HGA patients who seek medical attention will die from the infection [10,91]. The severity of disease appears to be related in part to the patient’s immune status [90,91,107,112]. Although the case fatality rate for HGA is lower than that for HME, complications such as respiratory failure, toxic shock-like syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, pancreatitis, acute renal failure and opportunistic viral or fungal pathogen infections can occur, especially among patients who have comorbid illnesses or are immuno-suppressed. Advanced age and delays in diagnosis and initiation of antibiotic therapy often lead to more severe HGA [11,90,91].

Antibiotic treatment

The current recommended therapeutic regimens for HME, HGA and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis is administration of doxycycline or tetracycline for 5–14 days [10,27,90,107]. Owing to its twice-daily dosage, compared with four doses for tetracycline and better patient tolerance, doxycycline is the antibiotic of choice. While repeated exposures to tetracycline increase the risk for dental staining [124], limited use of this drug in children under 8 years of age has a negligible effect [125,126]. Because HGA, HME and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis can be life-threatening and since the risk of dental staining with a short treatment course is minimal, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases identifies doxycycline as the drug of choice for treating presumed or confirmed human ehrlichioses in children of any age [127]. The recommended dosage of doxycyline is 100 mg for adults and 2.2 mg/kg for children 8 years of age or older given orally every 12 h. Adults can receive the dosage intravenously, if required. Tetracycline should be administered orally at 6-h intervals at a dosage of 500 mg for adults and 25–50 mg/kg/day for children 8 years of age or older. The clinical response to doxycycline or tetracycline treatment is pronounced, with marked improvement in overall well-being and fever within 24–48 h. The absence of such a response should prompt consideration of alternate diagnoses, such as a non-ehrlichial infection, a complicating infection by another tick-borne pathogen, or a secondary infection that is not susceptible to tetracycline antibiotics [11,27]. Tetracyclines are generally not prescribed for pregnant women because of risks of malformation of teeth and bones in the fetus and hepatotoxicity and pancreatitis in the mother [11]. However, tetracycline and doxycycline have been used to successfully treat HME and HGA in pregnant women, respectively [103,128]. Thus, the use of tetracycline antibiotics might be warranted in the case of a life-threatening situation [11].

Although no trials for efficacy have been conducted, a small number of pediatric-age and pregnant HGA patients have been successfully treated with rifampin [107,129131]. It is only recommended when the patient has a history of allergy to tetracycline antibiotics, is under 8 years of age, or is pregnant [107]. The dosage for rifampin is 300 mg orally twice daily for adults or 10 mg/kg for children (maximum of 300 mg/dose) [90]. Treatment should continue until the patient is afebrile for 3 days. The fluoroquinolone, levofloxacin, has in vitro MICs that would predict efficacy [132,133]. However, treatment of HGA with this antibiotic in at least one patient suppressed, but did not resolve, infection. Moreover, E. chaffeensis exhibits resistance in vitro to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Therefore, fluoroquinolones should not be used to treat human ehrlichioses [134]. In vitro evidence suggests that chloramphenicol might not be effective for treating HME or HGA [132,135]. There is a paucity of evidence for alternative antibiotic treatments as in vitro β-lactams, cephalosporins, macrolides and aminoglycosides are inactive against both E. chaffeensis and A. phagocytophilum and evidence of in vivo efficacy of these drugs is lacking.

Prophylactic antibiotic therapy for human ehrlichial infections is not recommended for patients that recall having been bitten by a tick and are not ill. Because the percentages of ticks infected with the causative agents of human ehrlichioses are relatively low [12,28,29,96], the risk for infection with these agents following a tick bite is low.

Expert commentary

The best method for the prevention of human ehrlichioses is to limit one’s exposure to ticks. Since the infectious agents can be transmitted within a few hours after tick attachment, rapid removal of the tick does not necessarily exclude the chance for infection. Wearing protective clothing and using repellent sprays can reduce the risk of tick attachment. DEET (N, N-diethylmeta-toluamide) and permethrin-based products are deemed safe for human topical application or application to clothing, respectively [136,137]. Alternative repellents containing natural compounds such as citrodiol or p-menthane-3,8-diol, which are derived from lemon-scented eucalyptus oil [138], are also available and have proven effective at deterring tick attachment [139].

Obtaining a thorough patient history is critical for presumptively diagnosing human ehrlichioses early on in infection in order to promptly initiate antibiotic therapy prior to confirmatory diagnosis. This is especially important in areas where Ixodes spp. or A. americanum ticks are endemic. Doxycycline is the antibiotic of choice for all patients unless they are pregnant or have a documented history of allergy to doxycycline or tetracycline. For those unable to take doxycycline or tetracycline, rifampin is an alternative with good in vitro MICs and anecdotal clinical success. While serologic testing is the most sensitive diagnostic confirmatory method, PCR is rapidly becoming the choice diagnostic method at or soon after presentation. Also, PCR is presently the only method available for diagnosing E. ewingii infection. In the USA, suspected and confirmed cases of HGA, HME and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis are required to be reported to the appropriate public-health authority to assist in control measures and public-health education efforts. Sustained surveillance of these tick-transmitted diseases will continue to identify endemic regions around the world and delineate their seroepidemiologic trends.

Five-year view

We expect that the numbers of reported cases of HGA, HME and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis will continue to rise as clinicians continue to become more aware of these infections, their clinical presentations and their areas of geographic distribution, and as research scientists continue to refine sensitive and rapid methods for diagnosing each disease. The latter will be facilitated by identification of A. phagocytophilum-, E. chaffeensis- and E. ewingii- specific antigens that are expressed during infection and elicit the production of non-cross-reactive antibodies. Improved clinical recognition of human ehrlichioses will in turn aid the efforts of epidemiologists and ecologists to better understand these emerging pathogens and further define their areas of endemicity. A critical area of cellular microbiology research is to identify the bacterial adhesins that facilitate adherence to and invasion of host leukocytes. Accomplishing this task will delineate novel targets for nonantibiotic-based therapeutic and/or protective measures against the etiologic agents of human ehrlichioses.

Key issues

  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii are obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens and are the etiologic agents of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis, respectively. A. phagocytophilum is transmitted by ticks of the Ixodes persulcatus complex, while E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii are transmitted by Amblyomma americanum.
  • A. phagocytophilum, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii infect peripherally circulating leukocytes to cause infections that range in clinical spectra from asymptomatic seroconversion to mild or severe disease. These infections are fatal in less than 3% of cases.
  • Nonspecificity can occur in indirect immunofluorescence assay due to cross-reactivity between A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis antibodies. Likewise, this technique cannot distinguish between E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii antibodies. Seroconversion or fourfold increase in antibody titers is strongly preferred over single titers for diagnostic confirmation.
  • Early clinical signs associated with HGA, HME and E. ewingii ehrlichiosis can resemble nonspecific symptoms of other infections or noninfectious diseases, which could obfuscate correct diagnosis. Therefore, it is imperative to obtain a thorough patient history regarding recent tick bites; exposure (including travel) to their habitats particularly around times of known high tick activity and clustering of similar illness in family members, coworkers, other defined groups, or pets.
  • Clinicians who practice in areas that are nonendemic for human ehrlichioses should still be familiar with the epidemiology of these diseases as such knowledge will be helpful in thoroughly querying patients that have recently travelled to endemic regions, and to detect their emergence in new regions.
  • The onset of human ehrlichioses can be fast and potentially fatal. Therefore, antibiotic therapy should be administered as soon as infection is suspected even before laboratory diagnosis has been confirmed.
  • For accurate diagnosis upon clinical presentation, it is imperative that blood samples be taken before initiation of treatment since antibiotic therapy rapidly reduces the detected quantities of infected cells and bacterial DNA in peripheral blood.
  • Leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and mildly elevated hepatic transaminase levels are commonly observed for human ehrlichioses and are useful clinical features for making presumptive diagnoses of such infections. Absence of such features does not exclude diagnosis of a human ehrlichiosis.
  • Not all patients with HGA, HME or E. ewingii ehrlichiosis will require hospitalization.
  • Doxycycline is the antibiotic of choice for the treatment of HME, HGA and E. ewingii unless the patient is pregnant or has a documented history of allergy to doxycycline or tetracycline. For those unable to take doxycycline or tetracycline, rifampin is a suitable alternative.

Acknowledgements

The authors would especially like to recognize comprehensive reports on the assessment, treatment and management of tick-borne diseases that were compiled by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [107], the Tick-borne Rickettsial Diseases Working Group [11] and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology of Infectious Diseases Study Group on Coxiella, Anaplasma, Rickettsia, and Bartonella in conjunction with the European Network for Surveillance of Tick-Borne Diseases [106], each of which were integral to comprising this review. The authors apologize to those investigators whose work that could not be cited due to space limitation, and thank Matthew J Troese of Virginia Commonwealth University for providing electron micrographs.

This work is supported in part by NIH grants R01AI072683 (Jason A Carlyon) and R01AI044102 (J Stephen Dumler) and a grant from the National Research Fund for Tick-borne Diseases (Jason A Carlyon).

Footnotes

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Rachael J Thomas, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA ; ude.ucv@samohtjr.

J Stephen Dumler, Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA ; ude.imhj@relmuds..

Jason A Carlyon, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Molecular Medicine Research Building, 1220 East Broad Street, Room 4052, PO Box 980678, Richmond, VA 23298-0678, USA Tel.: +1 804 628 3382 Fax: +1 804 828 9946 ; ude.ucv@noylracaj.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as:

• of interest

•• of considerable interest

1. Anderson BE, Dawson JE, Jones DC, Wilson KH. Ehrlichia chaffeensis, a new species associated with human ehrlichiosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991;29(12):2838–2842. [PubMed] Represents the discovery of Ehrlichia chaffeensis as a causative agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis.
2. Buller RS, Arens M, Hmiel SP, et al. Ehrlichia ewingii, a newly recognized agent of human ehrlichiosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;341(3):148–155. [PubMed] First report of Ehrlichia ewingii infection in humans
3. Chen SM, Dumler JS, Bakken JS, Walker DH. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994;32(3):589–595. [PubMed] Initial identification of what would eventually be named Anaplasma phagocytophilum as the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (formerly human granulocytic ehrlichiosis)
4. Foggie A. Studies on the infectious agent of tick-borne fever and sheep. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1951;63:1–15. [PubMed]
5. Gribble DH. Equine ehrlichiosis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1969;155:462–469. [PubMed]
6. Dumler JS, Barbet AF, Bekker CP, et al. Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and ‘HGE agent’ as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001;51(Pt 6):2145–2165. [PubMed]
7. Maeda K, Markowitz N, Hawley RC, et al. Human infection with Ehrlichia canis, a leukocytic rickettsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987;316(14):853–856. [PubMed]
8. Perez M, Rikihisa Y, Wen B. Ehrlichia canis-like agent isolated from a man in Venezuela: antigenic and genetic characterization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996;34(9):2133–2139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Perez M, Bodor M, Zhang C, Xiong Q, Rikihisa Y. Human infection with Ehrlichia canis accompanied by clinical signs in Venezuela. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2006;1078:110–117. [PubMed]
10. Dawson JE, Ewing SA, Davidson WR. Human monocytotrophic Ehrlichiosis. In: Goodman JL, Dennis DT, Sonenshine DE, editors. Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2005. pp. 239–257. Excellent review of the history, ecology, epidemiology, pathobiology, diagnosis and treatment of human monocytic ehrlichiosis
11. Chapman AS, Bakken JS, Folk SM, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis – United States: a practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2006;55(RR4):1–27. [PubMed] Indispensible guide for physicians and healthcare professionals on clinical diagnosis of tick-borne rickettsial diseases as well as patient management of such illnesses
12. Paddock CD, Childs JE. Ehrlichia chaffeensis: a prototypical emerging pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003;16(1):37–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Parola P, Davoust B, Raoult D. Tick- and flea-borne rickettsial emerging zoonoses. Vet. Res. 2005;36(3):469–492. [PubMed]
14. Long SW, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. Evaluation of transovarial transmission and transmissibility of Ehrlichia chaffeensis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) J. Med. Entomol. 2003;40(6):1000–1004. [PubMed]
15. Paddock CD, Yabsley MJ. Ecological havoc, the rise of white-tailed deer, and the emergence of Amblyomma americanum-associated zoonoses in the United States. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2007;315:289–324. [PubMed]
16. Kawahara M, Rikihisa Y, Lin Q, et al. Novel genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma centrale, and a novel Ehrlichia sp. in wild deer and ticks on two major islands in Japan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72(2):1102–1109. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Machado RZ, Duarte JM, Dagnone AS, Szabo MP. Detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis in Brazilian marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) Vet. Parasitol. 2006;139(1–3):262–266. [PubMed]
18. Lee M, Yu D, Yoon J, et al. Natural co-infection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma bovis in a deer in South Korea. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2009;71(1):101–103. [PubMed]
19. Ewing SA, Johnson EM, Kocan KM. Human infection with Ehrlichia canis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987;317(14):899–900. [PubMed]
20. Notifiable diseases/deaths in selected cities weekly information. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2009;57(52):1396–1407.
21. Fishbein DB, Dawson JE, Robinson LE. Human ehrlichiosis in the United States, 1985 to 1990. Ann. Intern. Med. 1994;120(9):736–743. [PubMed]
22. Gardner SL, Holman RC, Krebs JW, Berkelman R, Childs JE. National surveillance for the human ehrlichioses in the United States, 1997–2001, and proposed methods for evaluation of data quality. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2003;990:80–89. [PubMed]
23. Demma LJ, Holman RC, McQuiston JH, Krebs JW, Swerdlow DL. Epidemiology of human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in the United States, 2001–2002. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005;73(2):400–409. [PubMed]
24. Heo EJ, Park JH, Koo JR, et al. Serologic and molecular detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophila (human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent) in Korean patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002;40(8):3082–3085. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Moro PL, Shah J, Li O. Short report: serologic evidence of human ehrlichiosis in Peru. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009;80(2):242–244. [PubMed]
26. Uhaa IJ, MacLean JD, Greene CR, Fishbein DB. A case of human ehrlichiosis acquired in Mali: clinical and laboratory findings. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1992;46(2):161–164. [PubMed]
27. Goodman JL. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. In: Goodman JL, Dennis DT, Sonenshine DE, editors. Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2005. pp. 218–238. Excellent review of the history, ecology, epidemiology, pathobiology, diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytic anaplasmosis
28. Magnarelli LA, Stafford KC, 3rd, Mather TN, et al. Hemocytic rickettsia-like organisms in ticks: serologic reactivity with antisera to Ehrlichiae and detection of DNA of agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995;33(10):2710–2714. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Pancholi P, Kolbert CP, Mitchell PD, et al. Ixodes dammini as a potential vector of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1995;172(4):1007–1012. [PubMed]
30. Blanco JR, Oteo JA. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2002;8(12):763–772. [PubMed]
31. Cao WC, Zhao QM, Zhang PH, et al. Granulocytic Ehrlichiae in Ixodes persulcatus ticks from an area in China where Lyme disease is endemic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38(11):4208–4210. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Cinco M, Padovan D, Murgia R, et al. Coexistence of Ehrlichia phagocytophila and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus ticks from Italy as determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997;35(12):3365–3366. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Piccolin G, Benedetti G, Doglioni C, et al. A study of the presence of B. burgdorferi, Anaplasma (previously Ehrlichia) phagocytophilum, Rickettsia, and Babesia in Ixodes ricinus collected within the territory of Belluno, Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2006;6(1):24–31. [PubMed]
34. Mantelli B, Pecchioli E, Hauffe HC, Rosa R, Rizzoli A, et al. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the wood tick Ixodes ricinus in the Province of Trento, Italy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006;25(11):737–739. [PubMed]
35. Alberdi MP, Walker AR, Paxton EA, Sumption KJ. Natural prevalence of infection with Ehrlichia (Cytoecetes) phagocytophila of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Scotland. Vet. Parasitol. 1998;78(3):203–213. [PubMed]
36. Parola P, Beati L, Cambon M, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Ehrlichia DNA amplified from Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) in France. J. Med. Entomol. 1998;35(2):180–183. [PubMed]
37. Halos L, Vourc’h G, Cotte V, et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Rickettsia sp. and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato DNA in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks from France. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2006;1078:316–319. [PubMed]
38. Petrovec M, Sumner JW, Nicholson WL, et al. Identity of Ehrlichia DNA sequences derived from Ixodes ricinus ticks with those obtained from patients with human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Slovenia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37(1):209–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Liz JS, Anderes L, Sumner JW, et al. PCR detection of granulocytic Ehrlichiae in Ixodes ricinus ticks and wild small mammals in western Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38(3):1002–1007. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Pusterla N, Leutenegger CM, Huder JB, et al. Evidence of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37(5):1332–1334. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Schouls LM, Van De Pol I, Rijpkema SG, Schot CS. Detection and identification of Ehrlichia, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Bartonella species in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37(7):2215–2222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Skarphedinsson S, Lyholm BF, Ljungberg M, et al. Detection and identification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Rickettsia helvetica in Danish Ixodes ricinus ticks. Apmis. 2007;115(3):225–230. [PubMed]
43. Fingerle V, Munderloh UG, Liegl G, Wilske B. Coexistence of Ehrlichiae of the phagocytophila group with Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ricinus from Southern Germany. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 1999;188(3):145–149. [PubMed]
44. Baumgarten BU, Rollinghoff M, Bogdan C. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and granulocytic and monocytic Ehrlichiae in Ixodes ricinus ticks from southern Germany. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;7(11):3448-3453448–3451. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Christova IS, Dumler JS. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Bulgaria. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1999;60(1):58–61. [PubMed]
46. Oteo JA, Gil H, Barral M, et al. Presence of granulocytic Ehrlichia in ticks and serological evidence of human infection in La Rioja, Spain. Epidemiol. Infect. 2001;127(2):353–358. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Alekseev AN, Dubinina HV, Semenov AV, Bolshakov CV. Evidence of ehrlichiosis agents found in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from migratory birds. J. Med. Entomol. 2001;38(4):471–474. [PubMed]
48. Chmielewska-Badora J, Zwolinski J, Cisak E, et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus ticks determined by polymerase chain reaction with two pairs of primers detecting 16S rRNA and ankA genes. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2007;14(2):281–285. [PubMed]
49. Grzeszczuk A, Stanczak J. Highly variable year-to-year prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus ticks in northeastern Poland: a 4-year follow-up. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2006;1078:309–311. [PubMed]
50. Grzeszczuk A. Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus ticks and human granulocytic anaplasmosis seroprevalence among forestry rangers in Bialystok region. Adv. Med. Sci. 2006;51:283–286. [PubMed]
51. Bown KJ, Begon M, Bennett M, et al. Sympatric Ixodes trianguliceps and Ixodes ricinus ticks feeding on field voles (Microtus agrestis): potential for increased risk of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the United Kingdom? Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2006;6(4):404–410. [PubMed]
52. Bown KJ, Lambin X, Telford GR, et al. Relative importance of Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes trianguliceps as vectors for Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia microti in field vole (Microtus agrestis) populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74(23):7118–7125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Santos AS, Santos-Silva MM, Almeida VC, Bacellar F, Dumler JS. Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA in Ixodes ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from Madeira Island and Setubal District, mainland Portugal. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004;10(9):1643–1648. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Santos AS, Santos-Silva MM, Sousa RD, Bacellar F, Dumler JS. PCR-Based Survey of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Portuguese ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 [PubMed]
55. Burgdorfer W, Barbour AG, Hayes SF, et al. Lyme disease – a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science. 1982;216(4552):1317–1319. [PubMed]
56. Spielman A, Clifford CM, Piesman J, Corwin MD. Human babesiosis on Nantucket Island, USA: description of the vector, Ixodes (Ixodes) dammini, n. sp. (Acarina: Ixodidae) J. Med. Entomol. 1979;15(3):218–234. [PubMed]
57. Nuttal PA, Labuda M. Tick-born encephalitis. In: Goodman JL, Dennis DT, Sonenshine DE, editors. Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2005. pp. 150–163.
58. Lotric-Furlan S, Petrovec M, Avsic-Zupanc T, Strle F. Concomitant tickborne encephalitis and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005;11(3):485–488. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Nieto NC, Foley JE. Meta-analysis of coinfection and coexposure with Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in humans, domestic animals, wildlife, and Ixodes ricinus-complex ticks. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;9:93–102. [PubMed]
60. Skotarczak B, Rymaszewska A, Wodecka B, Sawczuk M. Molecular evidence of coinfection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent, and Babesia microti in ticks from northwestern Poland. J. Parasitol. 2003;89(1):194–196. [PubMed]
61. Telford SR, 3rd, Dawson JE, Katavolos P, et al. Perpetuation of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in a deer tick-rodent cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93(12):6209–6214. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Nieto NC, Foley JE. Evaluation of squirrels (Rodentia: Sciuridae) as ecologically significant hosts for Anaplasma phagocytophilum in California. J. Med. Entomol. 2008;45(4):763–769. [PubMed]
63. Foley JE, Clueit SB, Brown RN. Differential exposure to Anaplasma phagocytophilum in rodent species in northern California. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8(1):49–55. [PubMed]
64. Foley JE, Nieto NC, Clueit SB, et al. Survey for zoonotic rickettsial pathogens in northern flying squirrels, Glaucomys sabrinus, in California. J. Wildl. Dis. 2007;43(4):684–689. [PubMed]
65. Nieto NC, Foley JE. Reservoir competence of the Redwood chipmunk (Tamias ochrogenys) for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Epub ahead of print. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Foley J, Nieto NC, Madigan J, Sykes J. Possible differential host tropism in Anaplasma phagocytophilum strains in the Western United States. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2008;1149:94–97. [PubMed]
67. Levin ML, Nicholson WL, Massung RF, Sumner JW, Fish D. Comparison of the reservoir competence of medium-sized mammals and Peromyscus leucopus for Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Connecticut. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2(3):125–136. [PubMed]
68. Belongia EA, Reed KD, Mitchell PD, et al. Prevalence of granulocytic Ehrlichia infection among white-tailed deer in Wisconsin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997;35(6):1465–1468. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Massung RF, Slater K, Owens JH, et al. Nested PCR assay for detection of granulocytic Ehrlichiae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998;36(4):1090–1095. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Massung RF, Mather TN, Priestley RA, Levin ML. Transmission efficiency of the AP-variant 1 strain of Anaplasma phagocytophila. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2003;990:75–79. [PubMed]
71. Reichard MV, Roman RM, Kocan KM, et al. Inoculation of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) with Ap-V1 Or NY-18 strains of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and microscopic demonstration of Ap-V1 In Ixodes scapularis adults that acquired infection from deer as nymphs. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 (Epub ahead of print) [PubMed]
72. Petrovec M, Sixl W, Schweiger R, et al. Infections of wild animals with Anaplasma phagocytophila in Austria and the Czech Republic. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2003;990:103–106. [PubMed]
73. Brouqui P. Ehrlichiosis in Europe. In: Raoult D, Brouqui P, editors. Rickettsiae and Rickettsial Diseases at the Turn of the Third Millenium. Elsevier: Paris, France; 1999. pp. 220–232.
74. Bakken JS, Dumler JS, Chen SM, et al. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in the upper Midwest United States. A new species emerging? JAMA. 1994;272(3):212–218. [PubMed]
75. Ijdo JW, Meek JI, Cartter ML, et al. The emergence of another tickborne infection in the 12-town area around Lyme, Connecticut: human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2000;181(4):1388–1393. [PubMed]
76. Bakken JS, Krueth J, Wilson-Nordskog C, et al. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. JAMA. 1996;275(3):199–205. [PubMed]
77. Standaert SM, Yu T, Scott MA, et al. Primary isolation of Ehrlichia chaffeensis from patients with febrile illnesses: clinical and molecular characteristics. J. Infect. Dis. 2000;181(3):1082–1088. [PubMed]
78. Olano JP, Masters E, Hogrefe W, Walker DH. Human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis, Missouri. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003;9(12):1579–1586. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
79. Bakken JS, Goellner P, Van Etten M, et al. Seroprevalence of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis among permanent residents of northwestern Wisconsin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998;27(6):1491–1496. [PubMed]
80. Standaert SM, Dawson JE, Schaffner W, et al. Ehrlichiosis in a golf-oriented retirement community. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;333(7):420–425. [PubMed]
81. Brouqui P, Dumler JS, Lienhard R, Brossard M, Raoult D. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Europe. Lancet. 1995;346(8977):782–783. [PubMed]
82. Petrovec M, Lotric Furlan S, Zupanc TA, et al. Human disease in Europe caused by a granulocytic Ehrlichia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997;35(6):1556–1559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. van Dobbenburgh A, van Dam AP, Fikrig E. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in western Europe. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;340(15):1214–1216. [PubMed]
84. Oteo JA, Blanco JR, Martinez de Artola V, Ibarra V. First report of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis from southern Europe (Spain) Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2000;6(4):430–432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Karlsson U, Bjoersdorff A, Massung RF, Christensson B. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis – a clinical case in Scandinavia. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2001;33(1):73–74. [PubMed]
86. Bjoersdorff A, Berglund J, Kristiansen BE, Soderstrom C, Eliasson I. Varying clinical picture and course of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Twelve Scandinavian cases of the new tick-borne zoonosis are presented. Lakartidningen. 1999;96(39):4200–4204. [PubMed]
87. Misic-Majerus L, Bujic N, Madaric V, Avsic-Zupanc T, Milinkovic S. Human anaplasmosis (ehrlichiosis) Acta Med. Croatica. 2006;60(5):411–419. [PubMed]
88. Tylewska-Wierzbanowska S, Chmielewski T, Kondrusik M, et al. First cases of acute human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Poland. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2001;20(3):196–198. [PubMed]
89. Chochlakis D, Papaeustathiou A, Minadakis G, Psaroulaki A, Tselentis Y. A serosurvey of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in blood donors in Crete, Greece. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2008;27(6):473–475. [PubMed]
90. Bakken JS, Dumler S. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2008;22(3):433–448. viii. [PubMed]
91. Dumler JS, Madigan JE, Pusterla N, Bakken JS. Ehrlichioses in humans: epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007;45 Suppl. 1:S45–S51. [PubMed]
92. Sreter T, Sreter-Lancz Z, Szell Z, Kalman D. Anaplasma phagocytophilum: an emerging tick-borne pathogen in Hungary and Central Eastern Europe. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2004;98(4):401–405. [PubMed]
93. Portillo A, Santos AS, Santibanez S, et al. Detection of a non-pathogenic variant of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus from La Rioja, Spain. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2005;1063:333–336. [PubMed]
94. Anderson BE, Greene CE, Jones DC, Dawson JE. Ehrlichia ewingii sp. nov., the etiologic agent of canine granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1992;42(2):299–302. [PubMed]
95. Paddock CD, Liddell AM, Storch GA. Other causes of tick-borne ehrlichioses, including Ehrlichia ewingii. In: Goodman JL, Dennis DT, Sonenshine DE, editors. Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2005. Excellent review of the history, ecology, epidemiology, pathobiology, diagnosis and treatment of human E. ewingii ehrlichiosis and other tick-borne infections
96. Wolf L, McPherson T, Harrison B, et al. Prevalence of Ehrlichia ewingii in Amblyomma americanum in North Carolina. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38(7):2795. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
97. Anziani OS, Ewing SA, Barker RW. Experimental transmission of a granulocytic form of the tribe Ehrlichieae by Dermacentor variabilis and Amblyomma americanum to dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1990;51(6):929–931. [PubMed]
98. Yabsley MJ, Varela AS, Tate CM, et al. Ehrlichia ewingii infection in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002;8(7):668–671. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
99. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Anaplasma phagocytophilum transmitted through blood Transfusion –Minnesota, 2007. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2008;57(42):1145–1148. [PubMed] First report of transmission of A. phagocytophilum via blood transfusion
100. Zhang L, Liu Y, Ni D, et al. Nosocomial transmission of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in China. JAMA. 2008;300(19):2263–2270. [PubMed] Represents the first possible case of nosocomial transmission of human granulocytic anaplasmosis
101. Krause PJ, Wormser GP. Nosocomial transmission of human granulocytic anaplasmosis? JAMA. 2008;300(19):2308–2309. [PubMed] Expert commentary on the report by Zhang and colleagues
102. Gardner T. Lyme Disease. In: Remmington JS, Klein JO, editors. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. WB Saunders: PA, USA; 1995. pp. 447–528.
103. Horowitz HW, Kilchevsky E, Haber S, et al. Perinatal transmission of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;339(6):375–378. [PubMed]
104. Stamp JT, Watt JA, Jamieson S. Tick-borne fever as a cause of abortion in sheep. Vet. Rec. 1950;62(32):465–470. [PubMed]
105. Cranwell MP, Gibbons JA. Tick-borne fever in dairy herd. Vet. Rec. 1986;119(21):531–532. [PubMed]
106. Brouqui P, Bacellar F, Baranton G, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis of tick-borne bacterial diseases in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2004;10(12):1108–1132. [PubMed] Comprehensive guide to the diagnosis of bacterial tick-borne infections compiled by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology of Infectious Diseases Study Group on Coxiella, Anaplasma, Rickettsia and Bartonella in conjunction with the European Network for Surveillance of Tick-Borne Diseases
107. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006;43(9):1089–1134. [PubMed] Compendious review compiled by an expert panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America outlining the clinical guidelines assessing and managing tick-borne infections in the USA
108. Bakken JS, Haller I, Riddell D, Walls JJ, Dumler JS. The serological response of patients infected with the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002;34(1):22–27. [PubMed]
109. Dumler JS, Choi KS, Garcia-Garcia JC, et al. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005;11(12):1828–1834. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
110. Fishbein DB, Kemp A, Dawson JE, et al. Human ehrlichiosis: prospective active surveillance in febrile hospitalized patients. J. Infect. Dis. 1989;160(5):803–809. [PubMed]
111. Standaert SM, Clough LA, Schaffner W, Adams JS, Neuzil KM. Neurologic manifestations of human monocytic ehrlichiosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. Prac. 1998;7(7):358–362.
112. Paddock CD, Folk SM, Shore GM, et al. Infections with Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in persons coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001;33(9):1586–1594. [PubMed]
113. Bakken JS, Dumler JS. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytotropic anaplasmosis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2006;1078:236–247. [PubMed]
114. Bakken JS, Dumler JS. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;31(2):554–560. [PubMed]
115. Doyle CK, Labruna MB, Breitschwerdt EB, et al. Detection of medically important Ehrlichia by quantitative multicolor TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction of the dsb gene. J. Mol. Diagn. 2005;7(4):504–510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Bell CA, Patel R. A real-time combined polymerase chain reaction assay for the rapid detection and differentiation of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, and Ehrlichia ewingii. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2005;53(4):301–306. [PubMed]
117. Goodman JL, Nelson C, Vitale B, et al. Direct cultivation of the causative agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;334(4):209–215. [PubMed] Represents the first report of cultivation of A. phagocytophilum in mammalian tissue culture, which has been critical for all subsequent in vitro studies of the pathobiology of this bacterium
118. Carlyon JA. Laboratory Maintenance of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Chapter 3. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2005 Unit 3A 2. [PubMed] Comprehensive chapter on maintaining and studying A. phagocytophilum in the laboratory
119. Walls JJ, Aguero-Rosenfeld M, Bakken JS, et al. Inter- and intralaboratory comparison of Ehrlichia equi and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent strains for serodiagnosis of HGE by the immunofluorescent-antibody test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37(9):2968–2973. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
120. Walker DH. Ehrlichioses TFoCAf. Diagnosing human ehrlichioses: current status and recommendations. ASM News. 2000;66:287–290.
121. Dawson JE, Fishbein DB, Eng TR, Redus MA, Green NR. Diagnosis of human ehrlichiosis with the indirect fluorescent antibody test: kinetics and specificity. J. Infect. Dis. 1990;162(1):91–95. [PubMed]
122. Rikihisa Y, Ewing SA, Fox JC. Western immunoblot analysis of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, E. canis, or E. ewingii infections in dogs and humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994;32(9):2107–2112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
123. Yevich SJ, Sanchez JL, DeFraites RF, et al. Seroepidemiology of infections due to spotted fever group rickettsiae and Ehrlichia species in military personnel exposed in areas of the United States where such infections are endemic. J. Infect. Dis. 1995;171(5):1266–1273. [PubMed]
124. Wallman IS, Hilton HB. Teeth pigmented by tetracycline. Lancet. 1962;1(7234):827–829. [PubMed]
125. Grossman ER, Walchek A, Freedman H. Tetracyclines and permanent teeth: the relation between dose and tooth color. Pediatrics. 1971;47(3):567–570. [PubMed]
126. Lochary ME, Lockhart PB, Williams WT., Jr Doxycycline and staining of permanent teeth. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1998;17(5):429–431. [PubMed]
127. Pediatrics AAo. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Inffectious Diseases. Ehrlichia infections (human ehrlichioses) In: Pickering L, Baker C, Overturf G, Prober C, editors. 2003 Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. IL, USA: Elk Grove Village; 2003. pp. 266–269.
128. Smith Sehdev AE, Sehdev PS, Jacobs R, Dumler JS. Human monocytic ehrlichiosis presenting as acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002;35(9):e99–e102. [PubMed]
129. Buitrago MI, Ijdo JW, Rinaudo P, et al. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis during pregnancy treated successfully with rifampin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998;27(1):213–215. [PubMed]
130. Elston DM. Perinatal transmission of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;339(26):1942–1943. 1941–1942; author reply. [PubMed]
131. Krause PJ, Corrow CL, Bakken JS. Successful treatment of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in children using rifampin. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 Pt 1):e252–e253. [PubMed]
132. Klein MB, Nelson CM, Goodman JL. Antibiotic susceptibility of the newly cultivated agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis: promising activity of quinolones and rifamycins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997;41(1):76–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Maurin M, Bakken JS, Dumler JS. Antibiotic susceptibilities of Anaplasma (Ehrlichia) phagocytophilum strains from various geographic areas in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003;47(1):413–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
134. Wormser GP, Filozov A, Telford SR, 3rd, et al. Dissociation between inhibition and killing by levofloxacin in human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2006;6(4):388–394. [PubMed] Report indicating that levofloxacin is not effective in curing human granulocytic anaplasmosis
135. Brouqui P, Raoult D. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility of the newly recognized agent of ehrlichiosis in humans, Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1992;36(12):2799–2803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
136. Carroll JF, Klun JA, Debboun M. Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2005;19(1):101–106. [PubMed]
137. Lane RS. Treatment of clothing with a permethrin spray for personal protection against the Western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1989;6(4):343–352. [PubMed]
138. Piesman J, Eisen L. Prevention of tick-borne diseases. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008;53:323–343. [PubMed]
139. Gardulf A, Wohlfart I, Gustafson R. A prospective cross-over field trial shows protection of lemon eucalyptus extract against tick bites. J. Med. Entomol. 2004;41(6):1064–1067. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...