pmc logo image
Logo of jcmJ Clin Microbiol SubscriptionsJ Clin Microbiol Web Site

Formats:

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 January; 13(1): 120–125.
PMCID: PMC273734
Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
K E Aldridge and R L Hodges
Abstract
The Entero-Set kit (Fisher Diagnostics) is a 20-biochemical-test system used in the identification of members of the Enterobacteriaceae. This kit was compared with the API 20E (Analytab Products) and conventional media systems, using 505 (303 stock and 202 clinical) strains of Enterobacteriaceae. When the Entero-Set and API 20E results were compared with those of the conventional media system, the Entero-Set performed as well as the API 20E in overall identification. Comparison of common biochemical tests among the various systems showed that citrate, arabinose, adonitol, inositol, and malonate gave correlations below 90%. The majority of the discrepancies were found among stock cultures. In addition, most discrepancies occurred with species of Enterobacter, Salmonella, Proteus, Klebsiella, and Serratia. Reproducibility studies showed the Entero-Set system to perform with a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1001K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Images in this article
Click on the image to see a larger version.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Aldridge KE, Gardner BB, Clark SJ, Matsen JM. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):507–513. [PubMed]
  • Edberg SC, Atkinson B, Chambers C, Moore MH, Palumbo L, Zorzon CF, Singer JM. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):161–167. [PubMed]
  • Gardner JM, Snyder BA, Gröschel D. Experiences with the Analytab system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Pathol Microbiol (Basel). 1972;38(2):103–106. [PubMed]
  • Hansen SL, Hardesty DR, Myers BM. Evaluation of the BBL Minitek system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Nov;28(5):798–801. [PubMed]
  • Kiehn TE, Brennan K, Ellner PD. Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):668–671. [PubMed]
  • Lachica RV, Genigeorgis C, Hoeprich PD. Metachromatic agar-diffusion methods for detecting staphylococcal nuclease activity. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Apr;21(4):585–587. [PubMed]
  • Nord CE, Lindberg AA, Dahlbäck A. Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1974 Mar 22;159(3):211–220. [PubMed]
  • Rhoden DL, Tomfohrde KM, Smith PB, Balows A. Evaluation of the improved Auxotab 1 System for identifying Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Aug;26(2):215–216. [PubMed]
  • Smith PB, Tomfohrde KM, Rhoden DL, Balows A. Evaluation of the modified R-B system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Nov;22(5):928–929. [PubMed]
  • Tomfohrde KM, Rhoden DL, Smith PB, Balows A. Evaluation of the redesigned enterotube--a system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Feb;25(2):301–304. [PubMed]
  • Washington JA, 2nd, Yu PK, Martin WJ. Evaluation of the Auxotab Enteric 1 System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Feb;23(2):298–300. [PubMed]