• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of behavanLink to Publisher's site
Behav Anal. 1993 Fall; 16(2): 167–175.
PMCID: PMC2733639

Discriminating utopian from dystopian literature: Why is walden two considered a dystopia?

Abstract

Skinner thought of Walden Two as a utopia, but many literary critics consider it a dystopia. The present paper examines works by several authors of utopian literature in an effort to determine what elements lead critics to classify works as “dystopian.” Common elements seem to include (a) suspicion of scientific social planning, (b) the unhappiness of the characters portrayed, (c) suspicion of sources of control of behavior outside the individual, (d) violation of a presumed inherent need to struggle, and (e) suspicion of behavioral methods of governance. The elements Walden Two shares with other utopias and dystopias are examined, and the conclusion is offered that Walden Two could not be considered a dystopia for any of the traditional reasons. Instead, the negative view of Walden Two seems to be an outgrowth of literary devices and general negative reactions to behavioral determinism.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Newman B. Brave new world revisited revisited: Huxley's evolving view of behaviorism. Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;15(1):61–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles