![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Optical and Multimodality Molecular Imaging Insights Into Atherosclerosis Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center (F.A.J., P.L., R.W.) Harvard Medical School; the Cardiovascular Research Center and Cardiology Division (F.A.J.), the Center for Molecular Imaging Research (F.A.J., R.W.), and the Center for Systems Biology (R.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital; and the Cardiovascular Division (P.L.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass Correspondence to Farouc Jaffer, MGH CVRC, Simches Research Building, Room 3206, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail fjaffer/at/mgh.harvard.edu The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.Abstract Imaging approaches that visualize molecular targets rather than anatomic structures aim to illuminate vital molecular and cellular aspects of atherosclerosis biology in vivo. Several such molecular imaging strategies are poised for rapid clinical application. This review describes the growing role of in vivo optical molecular imaging in atherosclerosis and highlights its ability to visualize atheroma inflammation, calcification, and angiogenesis. In addition we discuss advances in multimodality probes, both in the context of multimodal imaging as well as multifunctional, or “theranostic,” nanoparticles. This review highlights particular molecular imaging strategies that possess strong potential for clinical translation. Keywords: atherosclerosis, molecular imaging, optical, fluorescence, multimodality, nanoparticle Imaging methods to identify high-risk atherosclerotic plaques have traditionally focused on stenosis detection, yet the majority of plaques responsible for acute coronary syndromes originate from non–flow-limiting lesions.1 Furthermore, numerous experimental and clinical studies reveal that biological processes such as inflammation modulate the risk of plaque disruption and consequent myocardial infarction and stroke.2 High-resolution molecular imaging approaches aim to bridge the gap between in vivo imaging and biological characterization of atheromata. Using novel targeted and activatable imaging agents, molecular imaging strategies now offer in vivo readouts for a diverse array of biological processes.3,4 This review discusses advances in atherosclerosis detection enabled by optical, specifically near-infrared fluorescence, molecular imaging, as well as by multimodality reporter agents. Near-Infrared Fluorescence Molecular Imaging The interaction of light with matter has yielded a number of powerful imaging modalities including fluorescence, absorption and Raman spectroscopy, optical coherence tomography, bioluminescence, and angioscopy (supplemental Table I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Fluorescence imaging, in particular, near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging (excitation 650 to 900 nm), provides a highly versatile platform for in vivo molecular imaging.5,6 Advantages of fluorescence as a molecular imaging modality include: (1) picomolar molecular sensitivity; (2) versatile targeting platforms such as peptides, proteins, antibody fragments, nanoparticles, phage, and aptamers; (3) a number of fluorescence detection imaging systems with microscopic resolution (epifluorescence, laser scanning, confocal, and multiphoton microscopy), mesoscopic resolution (optoacoustic imaging, fluorescence tomography, optical projection tomography), and macroscopic resolution (reflectance imaging, fluorescence-mediated tomography); and (4) a strong track record of clinical translation, with fluorescence imaging systems available for retinal angiography (via fluorescein or indocyanine green enhancement), endoscopy, bronchoscopy, coronary angioscopy, and coronary arterial bypass graft imaging.7 Compared to fluorescence imaging in the visible light or mid IR range, fluorescence imaging in the NIR bandwidth offers (1) markedly less photon absorption from blood hemoglobin, lipid, and water, enabling photon transmission centimeters deep into the body; and (2) substantially reduced tissue autofluorescence, enabling higher sensitivity detection of targeted NIRF molecular imaging agents against a low background (supplemental Figure I). For a greater discussion of the physics underlying efficient NIR photon delivery through tissues, fluorescence chemistry synthesis approaches, and fluorescence hardware systems, the interested reader can consult several reviews.5–7 In Vivo NIRF Molecular Imaging of Atherosclerosis Imaging of Protease Activity Inflammatory and destructive matrix metalloproteinases (eg, MMP-1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -9, -12, -13, and disintegrin metalloproteinases) cysteine proteases (eg, cathepsins S, K, B, and L), and serine proteases (eg, tissue plasminogen activator and urokinase-type plasminogen activator) are implicated in atherogenesis, plaque expansion, and plaque rupture.8 Augmented protease activity is an indicator of a high-risk plaque subtype9 and therefore represents an important molecular imaging target for atherosclerosis. Protease-Activatable NIRF Imaging Agents The chemical design and imaging amplification strategy of protease-activatable reporters10 are discussed in detail in the online supplemental materials. Noninvasive Fluorescence-Mediated Tomography of Plaque Protease Activity Fluorescence-mediated tomography (FMT) uses temporally and spatially resolved illuminators and detectors to detect NIR fluorochromes noninvasively and deep within the body.5,6 Advanced mathematical algorithms resolve photons deep within scattering tissue and render a quantitative 3-dimensional image of NIR fluorescence.11 Feasibility of noninvasive FMT of cysteine protease activity in atheromata first used apolipoprotein E–deficient (apoE−/− mice).12 Twenty-four hours after injection of a first generation protease-activatable NIRF imaging agent (Prosense680, dose 5 nmol per mouse, 0.25 μmol/kg), noninvasive FMT demonstrated focal NIRF signal in the atherosclerotic aorta (Figure 1
To visualize noninvasively plaque gelatinolytic activity in vivo, Deguchi et al used a second-generation protease-activatable agent to investigate MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity.13 The MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity agent was synthesized by incorporating the gelatinase sensitive peptide substrate GGPRQITAG into the first-generation protease activatable agent.14 Cholesterol-fed apoE−/− deficient mice received the gelatinase NIRF imaging agent (dose 8 nmol per mouse; 0.4 μmol/kg). After 24 hours, FMT revealed augmented NIRF signals in areas corresponding to the aortic root, arch and thoracic aorta, known sites of atherosclerosis in apoE−/− mice. Ex vivo FRI and NIRF microscopy validated the in vivo imaging findings. In addition, in situ zymography using quenched fluorescein-labeled gelatin demonstrated colocalization of plaque gelatinase NIRF signal with fluorescence signal from fluorescein. As NIR photons may potentially travel >5 centimeters deep into the body,5,6 noninvasive FMT systems may eventually detect NIRF signals from human carotid atheromata or from abdominal aortic aneurysms or plaques. Additional gains in FMT imaging may result from the use of nonfluid contact based imaging systems, integrated FMT-computed tomography (CT) systems, and multimodality imaging agents (discussed below). Intravital Fluorescence Microscopy (IVFM) of Plaque Cathepsin K Activity A novel NIRF approach to image cathepsin K protease activity in atherosclerosis15 is discussed in the online supplemental materials. Intravascular NIRF Catheter Sensing of Cysteine Protease Activity in Atherosclerosis To develop a highly clinically translatable approach to image proteolytically active atherosclerosis in coronary-sized vessels, we developed an intravascular NIRF sensing approach based on a clinically used optical coherence tomography (OCT) guide wire.16 The guide wire was percutaneously tested in cholesterol-fed balloon-injured rabbits harboring inflammatory proteases in iliac atheromata. Twenty-four hours before imaging, the rabbits received an injection of the first-generation protease-activatable agent for cysteine proteases (Prosense750, dose 600 nmol/kg). In vivo, the NIRF guide wire detected strong signal emanating from inflamed plaques (Figure 2
Imaging of Plaque Osteogenesis The spatiotemporal distribution of plaque osteogenic and inflammatory activity was concomitantly visualized in atheromata using IVFM technology17 and is discussed in detail in the online supplemental materials and supplemental Figure II. Imaging of Plaque Angiogenesis NIRF imaging of neoangiogenic vasculature in atheroma18,19 is discussed in the online supplemental materials. Emerging NIRF Imaging Agents Promising NIRF agents for in vivo optical molecular imaging of atherosclerosis (Table) include sensors for detection of apoptosis by annexin sensors,20 oxidative stress by hypochlorous acid,21 integrin sensors based on RGD,22 or small molecules (Intregrisense680), new plaque targeted nanoparticulate NIRF agents,23 cysteine protease activity based probes,24 NIR fluorescent deoxyglucose sensors for glycolytic flux/metabolism,25,26 similar to fluorine-18 deoxyglucose (18FDG) for PET metabolism studies, and matrix metalloproteinase presence via modified C-5– disubstituted baribiturates.27
Multimodal Probes: Imaging of Atherosclerosis Multimodal or multi-functional probes for molecular imaging fall into 2 categories: (1) probes that enable multiple in vivo imaging molecular readouts (multimodality imaging probes, ie, detectable by optical, MRI, and nuclear approaches simultaneously), and (2) probes that enable in vivo imaging and concomitant targeted therapy (therapeutic and diagnostic, or “theranostic,” probes). Favorable multimodality imaging probes harness capabilities from complementary imaging modalities to (1) achieve high sensitivity and high spatial resolution (eg, probes with reporter capabilities for both positron emission tomography and MRI) and to (2) enable both noninvasive and invasive molecular imaging (eg, via probes with MRI and NIR fluorescence reporter capabilities28). A common platform for multimodality probes uses MRI to obtain concomitant anatomic, chemical, and physiological information. Multimodality Imaging of Plaque Macrophages A powerful platform for multimodality molecular imaging of lesional macrophages uses dextran-coated crystalline iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). Iron-oxide MNPs are superparamagnetic imaging agents that exert field-dependent R2 and R1 effects. After phagocytosis by tissue macrophages, MNPs induce strong relaxation effects detectable on T2-weighted MRI, and more recently by off-resonance positive contrast approaches.29–32 A class of MNPs show promise clinically in prostate cancer33 and carotid atherosclerosis MRI studies.34–38 The development of a multimodality MNPs derivatized with an NIR fluorochrome28,39 enabled dual-modality imaging of plaque macrophages by MRI and intravital microscopy.17,40,41 In a very recent advance, Nahrendorf et al developed a trimodality iron oxide–based MNPs (TNP) for concomitant PET, MRI, and NIRF imaging of plaque macrophages (Figure 3
In vivo testing of TNP was performed in apoE−/− mice using in vivo PET/CT and in vivo 7.0 T MRI systems. Several important results were obtained. First, TNP permitted concomitant in vivo MRI and PET imaging of plaque macrophages (Figure 3 As starched-based iron oxide MNPs have been tested clinically,33–38 the TNP agent may ultimately enable clinical noninvasive PET/CT and MRI detection of carotid plaque macrophages, particularly as promising integrated PET/MRI scanners43 translate into the clinic to provide 1-stop molecular, anatomic, and physiological imaging capabilities. In addition, the fluorescence capability of TNP could enable invasive catheter-based NIRF detection16 of coronary plaque macrophages. Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule–1 The development of multimodal NIRF and MRI nanoparticles for in vivo imaging of VCAM-1 expression44,45 is discussed in detail in the online supplemental materials. Emerging Multimodality Imaging Probes Available multimodality probes with potential utility in atherosclerosis (Table) include apoptosis sensors for NIRF/MRI46 and angiogenic-targeted perfluorocarbon paramagnetic emulsions for MRI/ultrasound.47 Additional promising nanoparticle platforms that could be useful for in vivo multimodality imaging include perfluorocarbon based microemulsions, microbubbles, micelles, quantum dots, liposomes, and lipoproteins, and are comprehensively discussed in several recent reviews.48,49 Multimodal Theransotic Probes: Targeted Imaging and Therapy of Atherosclerosis Integrated diagnostic imaging and therapeutic molecules, or “theranostic” particles, are increasingly appreciated as a valuable advance for targeted therapy. Addition of a diagnostic imaging moiety to a targeted therapeutic enables temporal and spatial monitoring of the therapeutic agent. Imaging information in theranostics can be used to confirm delivery of therapy at the desired target, identify the need for modified dosing/redosing strategies, quantify and track the “molecular efficacy” of the therapeutic in vivo, and identify likely responders and nonresponders at the onset of therapy. Although theranostics are in the early stages for targeting atherosclerosis, several recent advances merit discussion. Integrated Imaging and Therapy of Plaque Angiogenesis Reduction of neovasculature in atheromata is an intriguing strategy to limit plaque growth and intraplaque hemorrhage.50,51 Building on an integrin αvβ3-targeted perfluorocarbon platform for molecular MRI of plaque angiogenesis,47 Winter et al developed an antiangiogenic atherosclerosis theranostic strategy by incorporating fumagillin, a naturally secreted antibiotic from Aspergillus fumigatus, into the surfactant layer of an integrin αvβ3 targeted nanoparticle.52 Hyperlipidemic rabbits with aortic atheromata were then injected with a single dose of control MNPs or fumagillin-targeted MNPs (≈26 μg/kg body weight). Immediate postinjection MRI of aortic plaques demonstrated similar evidence of angiogenesis for both groups. After 1 week, rabbits in both groups were reinjected with the control MNPs (angiogenic targeted MNPs without fumagillin). Rabbits that originally received the fumagillin MNPs showed a marked reduction of plaque angiogenesis in vivo (>60% reduction in averaged aortic MRI signal enhancement), whereas control rabbits showed unchanged levels of plaque angiogenesis. Furthermore, the initial signal enhancement on the original MRI scan predicted the net fumagilin MNP-mediated reduction in plaque angiogenesis (R2=0.62). In vivo MRI findings were corroborated by PECAM immunohistochemical analyses demonstrating a >60% reduction in the number of neovessels per plaque section in the fumagillin MNP group compared to the control MNP group. In a very recent study, Winter et al further used fumagillin MNPs to demonstrate an antiangiogenic synergism of fumagillin and statin therapy by in vivo MRI.53 Even more recently, a dual angiogenesis-targeted fumagillin theranostic nanoparticle (integrin αvβ3 and integrin α5β1) appears more effective than a single angiogenesis-targeted fumagillin NP (integrin αvβ3).54 Emerging Theranostic Agents for Atherosclerosis Additional agents (Table) such as photosensitizers with intrinsic NIR fluorescence capabilities55 or those with discrete NIR fluorochromes56 could offer the ability to characterize inflamed atheromata before photodynamic therapy. Another platform with substantial promise for atherosclerosis includes NIR fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles carrying therapeutic siRNA molecules.57 Conclusions Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis offers new opportunities to study the evolution of biology in vivo, as well as new clinically translatable strategies to identify high-risk coronary and carotid plaques. Rapid growth of optical, specifically near-infrared fluorescence, molecular imaging strategies show promise for imaging plaque inflammation, osteogenic activity, and angiogenesis with increasingly clinical-type imaging systems such as intravascular catheters or noninvasive tomography. Additional growth in multimodality probe technology, with imaging agents detectable by 2 or more imaging systems, as well as theranostic agents enabling spatiotemporal monitoring of targeted therapies, are also poised to strengthen emerging in vivo biological approaches to understanding and treating atherosclerotic vascular disease. suppl Click here to view.(457K, pdf) Acknowledgments Sources of Funding: This work was supported by the Donald W. Reynolds foundation (F.J., P.L., R.W.), Howard Hughes Medical Institute Early Career Award (F.J.), and American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant (F.J.). We gratefully acknowledge support from NIH grants UO1-HL080731, RO1-HL078641, and R24-CA92782. Footnotes Disclosures: Dr Jaffer is a consultant to VisEn Medical. Dr Weissleder is a shareholder in VisEn Medical. References 1. Ambrose JA, Winters SL, Arora RR, Eng A, Riccio A, Gorlin R, Fuster V. Angiographic evolution of coronary artery morphology in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:472–478. [PubMed] 2. Hansson GK, Libby P. The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:508–519. [PubMed] 3. Jaffer FA, Libby P, Weissleder R. Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2007;116:1052–1061. [PubMed] 4. Sanz J, Fayad ZA. Imaging of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2008;451:953–957. [PubMed] 5. Weissleder R, Ntziachristos V. Shedding light onto live molecular targets. Nat Med. 2003;9:123–128. [PubMed] 6. Ntziachristos V, Ripoll J, Wang LV, Weissleder R. Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:313–320. [PubMed] 7. Chang K, Jaffer F. Advances in fluorescence imaging of the cardiovascular system. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:417–428. [PubMed] 8. Dollery CM, Libby P. Atherosclerosis and proteinase activation. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;69:625–635. [PubMed] 9. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664–1672. [PubMed] 10. Weissleder R, Tung CH, Mahmood U, Bogdanov A., Jr In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:375–378. [PubMed] 11. Ntziachristos V, Tung CH, Bremer C, Weissleder R. Fluorescence molecular tomography resolves protease activity in vivo. Nat Med. 2002;8:757–760. [PubMed] 12. Chen J, Tung CH, Mahmood U, Ntziachristos V, Gyurko R, Fishman MC, Huang PL, Weissleder R. In vivo imaging of proteolytic activity in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:2766–2771. [PubMed] 13. Deguchi JO, Aikawa M, Tung CH, Aikawa E, Kim DE, Ntziachristos V, Weissleder R, Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: visualizing matrix metalloproteinase action in macrophages in vivo. Circulation. 2006;114:55–62. [PubMed] 14. Bremer C, Tung CH, Weissleder R. In vivo molecular target assessment of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat Med. 2001;7:743–748. [PubMed] 15. Jaffer FA, Kim DE, Quinti L, Tung CH, Aikawa E, Pande AN, Kohler RH, Shi GP, Libby P, Weissleder R. Optical visualization of cathepsin K activity in atherosclerosis with a novel, protease-activatable fluorescence sensor. Circulation. 2007;115:2292–2298. [PubMed] 16. Jaffer FA, Vinegoni C, John MC, Aikawa E, Gold HK, Finn AV, Ntziachristos V, Libby P, Weissleder R. Real-time catheter molecular sensing of inflammation in proteolytically active atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2008;118:1802–1809. [PubMed] 17. Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Figueiredo JL, Swirski FK, Shtatland T, Kohler RH, Jaffer FA, Aikawa M, Weissleder R. Osteogenesis associates with inflammation in early-stage atherosclerosis evaluated by molecular imaging in vivo. Circulation. 2007;116:2841–2850. [PubMed] 18. Matter CM, Schuler PK, Alessi P, Meier P, Ricci R, Zhang D, Halin C, Castellani P, Zardi L, Hofer CK, Montani M, Neri D, Luscher TF. Molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques using a human antibody against the extra-domain B of fibronectin. Circ Res. 2004;95:1225–1233. [PubMed] 19. Graf K, Dietrich T, Tachezy M, Scholle FD, Licha K, Stawowy P, Grafe M, Hauff P, Fleck E. Monitoring therapeutical intervention with ezetimibe using targeted near-infrared fluorescence imaging in experimental atherosclerosis. Mol Imaging. 2008;7:68–76. [PubMed] 20. Ntziachristos V, Schellenberger EA, Ripoll J, Yessayan D, Graves E, Bogdanov A, Jr, Josephson L, Weissleder R. Visualization of antitumor treatment by means of fluorescence molecular tomography with an annexin V-Cy5.5 conjugate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12294–12299. [PubMed] 21. Shepherd J, Hilderbrand SA, Waterman P, Heinecke JW, Weissleder R, Libby P. A fluorescent probe for the detection of myeloperoxidase activity in atherosclerosis-associated macrophages. Chem Biol. 2007;14:1221–1231. [PubMed] 22. Waldeck J, Hager F, Holtke C, Lanckohr C, von Wallbrunn A, Torsello G, Heindel W, Theilmeier G, Schafers M, Bremer C. Fluorescence reflectance imaging of macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaques using an alphavbeta3 integrin-targeted fluorochrome. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1845–1851. [PubMed] 23. Park K, Hong HY, Moon HJ, Lee BH, Kim IS, Kwon IC, Rhee K. A new atherosclerotic lesion probe based on hydrophobically modified chitosan nanoparticles functionalized by the atherosclerotic plaque targeted peptides. J Control Release. 2008;128:217–223. [PubMed] 24. Blum G, von Degenfeld G, Merchant MJ, Blau HM, Bogyo M. Noninvasive optical imaging of cysteine protease activity using fluorescently quenched activity-based probes. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:668–677. [PubMed] 25. Cheng Z, Levi J, Xiong Z, Gheysens O, Keren S, Chen X, Gambhir SS. Near-infrared fluorescent deoxyglucose analogue for tumor optical imaging in cell culture and living mice. Bioconjug Chem. 2006;17:662–669. [PubMed] 26. Kovar JL, Volcheck W, Sevick-Muraca E, Simpson MA, Olive DM. Characterization and performance of a near-infrared 2-deoxyglucose optical imaging agent for mouse cancer models. Anal Biochem. 2009;384:254–262. [PubMed] 27. Faust A, Waschkau B, Waldeck J, Holtke C, Breyholz HJ, Wagner S, Kopka K, Heindel W, Schafers M, Bremer C. Synthesis and evaluation of a novel fluorescent photoprobe for imaging matrix metalloproteinases. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19:1001–1008. [PubMed] 28. Kircher MF, Mahmood U, King RS, Weissleder R, Josephson L. A multimodal nanoparticle for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative optical brain tumor delineation. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8122–8125. [PubMed] 29. Cunningham CH, Arai T, Yang PC, McConnell MV, Pauly JM, Conolly SM. Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:999–1005. [PubMed] 30. Mani V, Briley-Saebo KC, Itskovich VV, Samber DD, Fayad ZA. Gradient echo acquisition for superparamagnetic particles with positive contrast (GRASP): sequence characterization in membrane and glass superparamagnetic iron oxide phantoms at 1.5T and 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:126–135. [PubMed] 31. Farrar CT, Dai G, Novikov M, Rosenzweig A, Weissleder R, Rosen BR, Sosnovik DE. Impact of field strength and iron oxide nanoparticle concentration on the linearity and diagnostic accuracy of off-resonance imaging. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:453–463. [PubMed] 32. Korosoglou G, Weiss RG, Kedziorek DA, Walczak P, Gilson WD, Schar M, Sosnovik DE, Kraitchman DL, Boston RC, Bulte JW, Weissleder R, Stuber M. Noninvasive detection of macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaque in hyperlipidemic rabbits using “positive contrast” magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:483–491. [PubMed] 33. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, Deserno WM, Tabatabaei S, van de Kaa CH, de la Rosette J, Weissleder R. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2491–2499. [PubMed] 34. Kooi ME, Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, Borgers M, Frederik PM, Daemen MJ, van Engelshoven JM. Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003;107:2453–2458. [PubMed] 35. Trivedi RA, U-King-Im J, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Horsley J, Goddard MJ, Skepper JN, Quartey G, Warburton E, Joubert I, Wang L, Kirkpatrick PJ, Brown J, Gillard JH. In vivo detection of macrophages in human carotid atheroma: temporal dependence of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced MRI. Stroke. 2004;35:1631–1635. [PubMed] 36. Trivedi RA, Mallawarachi C, U-King-Im J, Graves MJ, Horsley J, Goddard MJ, Brown A, Wang L, Kirkpatrick PJ, Brown J, Gillard JH. Identifying inflamed carotid plaques using in vivo USPIO-enhanced MR imaging to label plaque macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1601–1606. [PubMed] 37. Tang T, Howarth SP, Miller SR, Trivedi R, Graves MJ, U-King-Im J, Li ZY, Brown AP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Gaunt ME, Gillard JH. Assessment of inflammatory burden contralateral to the symptomatic carotid stenosis using high-resolution ultrasmall, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI. Stroke. 2006;37:2266–2270. [PubMed] 38. Tang TY, Howarth SP, Miller SR, Graves MJ, UK-I JM, Li ZY, Walsh SR, Patterson AJ, Kirkpatrick PJ, Warburton EA, Varty K, Gaunt ME, Gillard JH. Correlation of carotid atheromatous plaque inflammation using USPIO-enhanced MR imaging with degree of luminal stenosis. Stroke. 2008;39:2144–2147. [PubMed] 39. Denis MC, Mahmood U, Benoist C, Mathis D, Weissleder R. Imaging inflammation of the pancreatic islets in type 1 diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12634–12639. [PubMed] 40. Jaffer FA, Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D, Kelly KA, Aikawa E, Weissleder R. Cellular imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis using magnetofluorescent nanomaterials. Mol Imaging. 2006;5:85–92. [PubMed] 41. Pande AN, Kohler RH, Aikawa E, Weissleder R, Jaffer FA. Detection of macrophage activity in atherosclerosis in vivo using multichannel, high-resolution laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2006;11:021009. [PubMed] 42. Nahrendorf M, Zhang H, Hembrador S, Panizzi P, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, Libby P, Swirski FK, Weissleder R. Nanoparticle PET-CT imaging of macrophages in inflammatory atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2008;117:379–387. [PubMed] 43. Judenhofer MS, Wehrl HF, Newport DF, Catana C, Siegel SB, Becker M, Thielscher A, Kneilling M, Lichy MP, Eichner M, Klingel K, Reischl G, Widmaier S, Rocken M, Nutt RE, Machulla HJ, Uludag K, Cherry SR, Claussen CD, Pichler BJ. Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging. Nat Med. 2008;14:459–465. [PubMed] 44. Kelly KA, Allport JR, Tsourkas A, Shinde-Patil VR, Josephson L, Weissleder R. Detection of vascular adhesion molecule-1 expression using a novel multimodal nanoparticle. Circ Res. 2005;96:327–336. [PubMed] 45. Nahrendorf M, Jaffer FA, Kelly KA, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, Libby P, Weissleder R. Noninvasive vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 imaging identifies inflammatory activation of cells in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006;114:1504–1511. [PubMed] 46. Sosnovik DE, Schellenberger EA, Nahrendorf M, Novikov MS, Matsui T, Dai G, Reynolds F, Grazette L, Rosenzweig A, Weissleder R, Josephson L. Magnetic resonance imaging of cardiomyocyte apoptosis with a novel magneto-optical nanoparticle. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:718–724. [PubMed] 47. Winter PM, Morawski AM, Caruthers SD, Fuhrhop RW, Zhang H, Williams TA, Allen JS, Lacy EK, Robertson JD, Lanza GM, Wickline SA. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in early-stage atherosclerosis with alpha(v) beta3-integrin-targeted nanoparticles. Circulation. 2003;108:2270–2274. [PubMed] 48. McCarthy JR, Weissleder R. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles for targeted imaging and therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1241–1251. [PubMed] 49. Cormode DP, Skajaa T, Fayad ZA, Mulder WJ. Nanotechnology in Medical Imaging. Probe Design and Applications. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. In press. 50. Moulton KS, Heller E, Konerding MA, Flynn E, Palinski W, Folkman J. Angiogenesis inhibitors endostatin or TNP-470 reduce intimal neovascularization and plaque growth in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 1999;99:1726–1732. [PubMed] 51. Jain RK, Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Virmani R. Antiangiogenic therapy for normalization of atherosclerotic plaque vasculature: a potential strategy for plaque stabilization. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4:491–502. [PubMed] 52. Winter PM, Neubauer AM, Caruthers SD, Harris TD, Robertson JD, Williams TA, Schmieder AH, Hu G, Allen JS, Lacy EK, Zhang H, Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Endothelial alpha(v)beta3 integrin-targeted fumagillin nanoparticles inhibit angiogenesis in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2103–2109. [PubMed] 53. Winter PM, Caruthers SD, Zhang H, Williams TA, Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Antiangiogenic Synergism of Integrin-Targeted Fumagillin Nanoparticles and Atorvastatin in Atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:624–634. 54. Schmieder AH, Caruthers SD, Zhang H, Williams TA, Robertson JD, Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Three-dimensional MR mapping of angiogenesis with alpha5beta1(alpha nu beta3)-targeted theranostic nanoparticles in the MDA-MB-435 xenograft mouse model. FASEB J. 2008;22:4179–4189. [PubMed] 55. Tawakol A, Castano AP, Gad F, Zahra T, Bashian G, Migrino RQ, Ahmadi A, Stern J, Anatelli F, Chirico S, Shirazi A, Syed S, Fischman AJ, Muller JE, Hamblin MR. Intravascular detection of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques using a fluorescent photosensitizer targeted to the scavenger receptor. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2008;7:33–39. [PubMed] 56. McCarthy JR, Jaffer FA, Weissleder R. A macrophage-targeted theranostic nanoparticle for biomedical applications. Small. 2006;2:983–987. [PubMed] 57. Medarova Z, Pham W, Farrar C, Petkova V, Moore A. In vivo imaging of siRNA delivery and silencing in tumors. Nat Med. 2007;13:372–377. [PubMed] 58. Callahan RJ, Bogdanov A, Jr, Fischman AJ, Brady TJ, Weissleder R. Preclinical evaluation and phase I clinical trial of a 99mTc-labeled synthetic polymer used in blood pool imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:137–143. [PubMed] 59. Shah K, Weissleder R. Molecular optical imaging: applications leading to the development of present day therapeutics. NeuroRx. 2005;2:215–225. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Mar; 7(3):472-8.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986]Nat Rev Immunol. 2006 Jul; 6(7):508-19.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2006]Circulation. 2007 Aug 28; 116(9):1052-61.
[Circulation. 2007]Nature. 2008 Feb 21; 451(7181):953-7.
[Nature. 2008]Nat Med. 2003 Jan; 9(1):123-8.
[Nat Med. 2003]Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Mar; 23(3):313-20.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2005]J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 May-Jun; 15(3):417-28.
[J Nucl Cardiol. 2008]Nat Med. 2003 Jan; 9(1):123-8.
[Nat Med. 2003]J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 May-Jun; 15(3):417-28.
[J Nucl Cardiol. 2008]Cardiovasc Res. 2006 Feb 15; 69(3):625-35.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2006]Circulation. 2003 Oct 7; 108(14):1664-72.
[Circulation. 2003]Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Apr; 17(4):375-8.
[Nat Biotechnol. 1999]Nat Med. 2003 Jan; 9(1):123-8.
[Nat Med. 2003]Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Mar; 23(3):313-20.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2005]Nat Med. 2002 Jul; 8(7):757-60.
[Nat Med. 2002]Circulation. 2002 Jun 11; 105(23):2766-71.
[Circulation. 2002]Circulation. 2006 Jul 4; 114(1):55-62.
[Circulation. 2006]Nat Med. 2001 Jun; 7(6):743-8.
[Nat Med. 2001]Nat Med. 2003 Jan; 9(1):123-8.
[Nat Med. 2003]Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Mar; 23(3):313-20.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2005]Circulation. 2007 May 1; 115(17):2292-8.
[Circulation. 2007]Circulation. 2008 Oct 28; 118(18):1802-9.
[Circulation. 2008]Circulation. 2007 Dec 11; 116(24):2841-50.
[Circulation. 2007]Circ Res. 2004 Dec 10; 95(12):1225-33.
[Circ Res. 2004]Mol Imaging. 2008 Mar-Apr; 7(2):68-76.
[Mol Imaging. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 17; 101(33):12294-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Chem Biol. 2007 Nov; 14(11):1221-31.
[Chem Biol. 2007]J Nucl Med. 2008 Nov; 49(11):1845-51.
[J Nucl Med. 2008]J Control Release. 2008 Jun 24; 128(3):217-23.
[J Control Release. 2008]Nat Chem Biol. 2007 Oct; 3(10):668-77.
[Nat Chem Biol. 2007]Cancer Res. 2003 Dec 1; 63(23):8122-5.
[Cancer Res. 2003]Magn Reson Med. 2005 May; 53(5):999-1005.
[Magn Reson Med. 2005]J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 5; 52(6):483-91.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008]N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2491-9.
[N Engl J Med. 2003]Circulation. 2003 May 20; 107(19):2453-8.
[Circulation. 2003]Stroke. 2008 Jul; 39(7):2144-7.
[Stroke. 2008]Cancer Res. 2003 Dec 1; 63(23):8122-5.
[Cancer Res. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 24; 101(34):12634-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Circulation. 2007 Dec 11; 116(24):2841-50.
[Circulation. 2007]Mol Imaging. 2006 Apr-Jun; 5(2):85-92.
[Mol Imaging. 2006]J Biomed Opt. 2006 Mar-Apr; 11(2):021009.
[J Biomed Opt. 2006]Circulation. 2007 Aug 28; 116(9):1052-61.
[Circulation. 2007]Nature. 2008 Feb 21; 451(7181):953-7.
[Nature. 2008]N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2491-9.
[N Engl J Med. 2003]Stroke. 2008 Jul; 39(7):2144-7.
[Stroke. 2008]Nat Med. 2008 Apr; 14(4):459-65.
[Nat Med. 2008]Circulation. 2008 Oct 28; 118(18):1802-9.
[Circulation. 2008]Circ Res. 2005 Feb 18; 96(3):327-36.
[Circ Res. 2005]Circulation. 2006 Oct 3; 114(14):1504-11.
[Circulation. 2006]Magn Reson Med. 2005 Sep; 54(3):718-24.
[Magn Reson Med. 2005]Circulation. 2003 Nov 4; 108(18):2270-4.
[Circulation. 2003]Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008 Aug 17; 60(11):1241-51.
[Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008]Circulation. 1999 Apr 6; 99(13):1726-32.
[Circulation. 1999]Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Sep; 4(9):491-502.
[Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007]Circulation. 2003 Nov 4; 108(18):2270-4.
[Circulation. 2003]Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Sep; 26(9):2103-9.
[Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006]FASEB J. 2008 Dec; 22(12):4179-89.
[FASEB J. 2008]Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2008 Jan; 7(1):33-9.
[Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2008]Small. 2006 Aug; 2(8-9):983-7.
[Small. 2006]Nat Med. 2007 Mar; 13(3):372-7.
[Nat Med. 2007]AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jul; 171(1):137-43.
[AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998]NeuroRx. 2005 Apr; 2(2):215-25.
[NeuroRx. 2005]Mol Imaging. 2006 Apr-Jun; 5(2):85-92.
[Mol Imaging. 2006]