![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 Wolf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. A catalytically and genetically optimized β-lactamase-matrix based assay for sensitive, specific, and higher throughput analysis of native henipavirus entry characteristics 1Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095 2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095 3UCLA AIDS Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095 4Department of Pathology, University of Texas, Medical Branch, UTMB, Galveston, TX, USA 77555 Corresponding author.Mike C Wolf: mikewolf/at/ucla.edu; Yao Wang: wangyao/at/ucla.edu; Alexander N Freiberg: anfreibe/at/utmb.edu; Hector C Aguilar: haguilar/at/ucla.edu; Michael R Holbrook: mrholbro/at/utmb.edu; Benhur Lee: bleebhl/at/ucla.edu Received July 3, 2009; Accepted July 31, 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus (HeV) are the only paramyxoviruses requiring Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) containment. Thus, study of henipavirus entry at less than BSL-4 conditions necessitates the use of cell-cell fusion or pseudotyped reporter virus assays. Yet, these surrogate assays may not fully emulate the biological properties unique to the virus being studied. Thus, we developed a henipaviral entry assay based on a β-lactamase-Nipah Matrix (βla-M) fusion protein. We first codon-optimized the bacterial βla and the NiV-M genes to ensure efficient expression in mammalian cells. The βla-M construct was able to bud and form virus-like particles (VLPs) that morphologically resembled paramyxoviruses. βla-M efficiently incorporated both NiV and HeV fusion and attachment glycoproteins. Entry of these VLPs was detected by cytosolic delivery of βla-M, resulting in enzymatic and fluorescent conversion of the pre-loaded CCF2-AM substrate. Soluble henipavirus receptors (ephrinB2) or antibodies against the F and/or G proteins blocked VLP entry. Additionally, a Y105W mutation engineered into the catalytic site of βla increased the sensitivity of our βla-M based infection assays by 2-fold. In toto, these methods will provide a more biologically relevant assay for studying henipavirus entry at less than BSL-4 conditions. Background The henipaviruses, Nipah (NiV) and Hendra (HeV), are emerging zoonoses; the former caused multiple outbreaks of fatal encephalitis in Malaysia, Bangladesh, and India with mortalities ranging from 40-70% while the latter produced respiratory syndromes among thoroughbred horses in Australia whilst also being implicated in the death of a horse handler [1-4]. These two paramyxoviruses, both designated Category C priority pathogens by the NIAID Biodefense Research Agenda, require strict Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) containment due to their extreme pathogenicity, unverified mode(s) of transmission, and lack of pre- or post-exposure treatments[4]. BSL-4 containment limits the opportunities for thorough analysis of live henipavirus entry characteristics. Surrogate assays to study henipavirus entry at less than BSL-4 conditions exist, such as cell-cell fusion or VSV-based NiV-envelope pseudotyped reporter assays. These assays have been used to probe envelope receptor interactions and characterize the determinants of fusion with regards to both the fusion (F) and attachment (G) envelope glycoproteins [5-10]. However, cell-cell fusion lacks the geometric and kinetic constraints found in virus-cell fusion while pseudotyped VSV particles physically resemble Rhabdoviridae rather than the pleomorphic Paramyxoviridae. Therefore, neither assay may fully recapitulate the biological properties of native envelope structures of live henipaviruses. Moreover, pseudotype reporter virus assays depend on efficient transcription and translation of a reporter gene after virus entry. Thus, earlier steps in viral entry, such as matrix uncoating, may also not be resolved by either of these assays. Many viruses form virus-like particles (VLPs) via expression of their matrix alone (e.g. Sendai, HPIV-1, Ebola, HIV, Rabies) or only in combination with envelope proteins (e.g. Simian Virus 5, Measles) [11-19]. Paramyxoviral matrix proteins direct budding of virions from the surface of infected cells and interact with the endodomain of envelope proteins, ultimately assisting in viral assembly[11,20]. Specifically, NiV matrix (NiV-M) alone, or in combination with its fusion protein (NiV-F) and receptor-binding protein (NiV-G), buds and forms VLPs efficiently[21,22]. Additionally, matrix may function to recruit the nucleoprotein-encased genome to the budding site[15,23]. Paramyxoviral matrix proteins perform essential roles in viral release/budding and presumably rely on late domains[20,24] for these functions; although typical late domain motifs have not been found in certain paramyxoviral M proteins[25]. Thus, NiV matrix-based VLPs will likely better reflect the biological properties of their live-virus counterparts in entry assays. Here, we developed a VLP-based assay that can be used for analyses of henipaviral entry characteristics under BSL-2 conditions. This VLP assay is based on a β-lactamase-Nipah Matrix (βla-M) fusion reporter protein. β-lactamase (βla) is a commonly used reporter protein whose reporter activity depends on its ability to cleave β-lactam ring-containing fluorescent or colorimetric substrates. For our purposes, CCF2-AM proved useful as a cell-permeant fluorescent substrate engineered to exhibit a shift from green to blue fluorescence upon βla cleavage [26-28]. CCF2-AM cell loading is nearly 100% efficient, practically irreversible (cytoplasmic esterases prevent CCF2 from diffusing out of the cells), and permits loading of a variety of cell types including primary neuron or microvascular endothelial cells, the main targets of NiV infection. Thus, virus-cell fusion of envelope bearing βla-M VLPs should deliver βla-M to the cytosol leading to fluorescent conversion of the pre-loaded CCF2 substrate. The shift from green to blue fluorescence can then be quantified by flow cytometry or quantitative microscopy. Genetic optimization of both the expression and the intrinsic enzymatic efficiency of the βla-M reporter allowed for sensitive, specific and relatively high-throughput analyses of henipavirus entry in the absence of vaccinia augmentation. Our results suggest that this strategy may be generalized to other viruses where matrix is the primary determinant of budding and virion morphology. Results Synthesis of the β-lactamase-Nipah Matrix (βla-M) fusion construct and its incorporation into virus-like particles (VLPs) NiV-M is a small, basic and moderately hydrophobic 352 amino-acid protein and one of the most abundant proteins within the virion. Therefore, we chose to fuse a reporter protein to NiV-M in a manner that does not interfere with its ability to form VLPs. Published data shows that the C-terminal end of many matrix proteins regulates complex functions involved in budding and viral assembly[20,25,29-35]; thus, we decided to fuse the β-lactamase gene (βla) onto the N-terminus of NiV-M. Examination of the codon-usage of wild-type βla and wild-type NiV-M revealed a skewing towards the use of rare mammalian codons (Fig. (Fig.1a).1a
Codon-optimized NiV-M and βla-M were equivalently expressed in transfected 293T cells (Fig. (Fig.1b).1b βla-M+NiV-F/G VLPs morphologically, biochemically, and biologically mimic live NiV NiV-M will bud and form VLPs in the presence or absence of co-transfected NiV-F and NiV-G[21,22]. Thus, we also determined how well βla-M would bud and form VLPs in the presence or absence of NiV-F and NiV-G. Fig. Fig.2a2a
Next, we characterized the morphology of the VLPs by imaging the βla-M VLPs via electron microscopy. Fig. Fig.2b2b Fig. Fig.2c2c βla-M+NiV-F/G VLPs infect biologically relevant cells in a receptor-dependent manner To further illustrate the biological relevance of our βla-M VLP entry assay, we used βla-M VLPs to infect primary cell targets of natural NiV infection. The formation of giant-multinucleated syncytia in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVECs) is a pathogenic hallmark of NiV infection[38]. Thus, we used βla-M VLPs to infect HMVECs preloaded with CCF2-AM (Fig. (Fig.3a3a
Hendra virus (HeV) envelope proteins package efficiently onto βla-M(NiV) and produce infectious VLPs Molecular and immunological data indicate that NiV and HeV are closely related viruses that can be appropriately clustered into a new henipavirus genus. Indeed, NiV and HeV F and G proteins can functionally cross-complement each other[5,39]. However, it remains unknown whether NiV-M can complement the function of HeV-M to produce infectious HeV envelope bearing VLPs. While rhabdoviral matrices can functionally accommodate many heterologous envelope proteins, it is less clear whether paramyxoviral matrix proteins can incorporate heterologous envelope proteins in a functional manner. Fig. Fig.4a4a
βla-M VLPs enveloped with the NiV-GE505A mutant recapitulate differential receptor usage NiV and HeV exhibit analogous tropisms and both utilize ephrinB2 and ephrinB3 for cellular entry; although how well ephrinB2 or ephrinB3 allows for entry into various primary cell targets of henipavirus infections remains to be defined[9,40]. However, both NiV and HeV utilize ephrinB2 with much greater efficiency than ephrinB3[9,40]. Interestingly, a point mutation (E505A) within the globular domain of NiV-G abrogates efficient B3-dependent entry while leaving B2-dependent entry unaffected[39]. We previously argued that differential ephrinB2 versus B3 usage may have direct pathogenic relevance as only ephrinB3 is expressed in the brainstem[39,41], the site of neuronal dysfunction ultimately causing death from encephalitis after NiV infection[42]. Thus, to fully contextualize this previously reported phenotype, we sought to determine if the differential receptor usage of the NiV-GE505A mutant is fully recapitulated using βla-M VLPs. Indeed, incorporation of an NiV-GE505A envelope mutant along with NiV-F onto βla-M resulted in VLPs defective in their ability to gain entry into CHO-B3 cells, but not CHO-B2 cells (Fig. (Fig.5a5a
A Y105W mutation within the active site of βla increases cleavage efficiency resulting in a more sensitive entry assay To further increase the sensitivity of our βla-M based assay for future high-throughput tasks, we sought to improve the catalytic activity of βla. Active site mutations have been shown to increase the substrate cleavage efficiency of βla for certain β-lactam containing antibiotics in an enzyme subtype and substrate specific manner [43-46]. Thus, we searched the literature for active site mutations that increase the catalytic activity of the βla (TEM1 strain) for the substrate cefazolin, the most closely related β-lactam to CCF2-AM. A tyrosine to tryptophan (Y105W) mutation within the active site of the TEM1-βla increases the catalytic activity (Kcat/Km) for cefazolin by 1.5-fold[46]. Therefore, we engineered this Y105W mutation into βla-M (βlaY105W-M) in order to increase the assay sensitivity and make the system more amenable to high-throughput tasks. Indeed, βlaY105W-M increased the signal to noise ratio obtained in our VLP entry assay 1.8-fold (Fig. (Fig.6a)6a
Discussion and conclusion Many viral entry studies on highly pathogenic agents have relied on cell-cell fusion and envelope pseudotyped reporter assays which have permitted detailed analyses of their entry characteristics without high-level biosafety containment. Yet, these surrogate assays may not fully emulate the biological properties unique to the virus being studied. Cell-cell fusion assays do not mimic virus-cell fusion kinetics and are not constrained by the geometry of virus-cell fusion, and envelope pseudotyped viral systems reflect the virion morphology of the backbone virus rather than the parental virus from which the envelopes are derived. Such differences may confound accurate dissection of the entry pathway under study. Pseudotyped reporter virus assays also require efficient replication and transcription of the reporter gene in the cell type used, and thus, post-entry factors may influence the efficiency of reporter gene expression. For BSL-4 containment viruses like NiV and HeV, the problems are compounded by the limited availability of resources to confirm the results of surrogate assays in live henipaviruses. Thus, we sought to develop a system that more faithfully replicates the native henipavirus entry process. This will allow for a more detailed and biologically relevant analysis of early entry events and will facilitate the development of high-throughput screens for inhibitors of bona fide henipavirus entry processes. VLPs can be produced via expression of viral matrices alone or in combination with their respective envelope proteins [11-19]. Paramyxoviral matrix proteins, abundant within the virion, seemingly act as the 'bandleader' by coordinating several events within the viral life cycle: envelope protein localization, assembly and budding, nucleocapsid or genome recruitment, and particle disassembly or uncoating[11,47]. Thus, these VLPs more faithfully mimic their live virus counterparts and permit a more biologically relevant analysis of entry and uncoating kinetics. Despite these many functionalities, none appear to be significantly disrupted by fusing large reporter proteins like GFP, Renilla luciferase, or βla to the N-terminus of NiV-M[22] (Fig. (Fig.22 Several viral entry assays have been developed that rely on cytosolic delivery, or intravirion detection, of a virion associated reporter fusion protein. For example, entry assays using vpr-βla for HIV and βla-matrix for Ebola have been described[48,49], yet the published assays would appear to be less sensitive than our current system[48,50]. In the process of making our βla-M reporter, we discovered that both the NiV-M and the βla genes tended to use rare mammalian codons (Fig. (Fig.1a1a Our βla-M VLPs adopt the pleomorphic morphology of paramyxoviruses and incorporate henipaviral envelopes in a manner indistinguishable from wild-type NiV-M VLPs. NiV and HeV envelope bearing βla-M VLPs recapitulate their biological phenotypes in terms of receptor usage and the requirements for F and G in the paramyxoviral entry process (Figs. (Figs.2,2 While it is clear that Rhabdoviridae can functionally accommodate many different heterologous envelopes [51-54], it is less clear whether paramyxoviral matrix proteins have the ability to functionally cross-complement other members of the family. We demonstrated here that βla-M(NiV) was able to complement and package the HeV envelope proteins, emphasizing the relatedness between these two viruses. Our results open the possibility that other paramyxoviral envelope proteins can functionally cross-complement onto βla-M(NiV), or their own respective βla-matrix fusion constructs, thereby providing a more efficient and high-throughput assay to study paramyxoviral entry. Arguably, short of reverse genetics to study matrix and envelope mutants in the context of parent paramyxoviruses, this βla-M VLP assay better reflects the native biology of paramyxoviral entry than other surrogate assays. To further improve the sensitivity of this assay for high-throughput applications, we exploited the vast literature on β-lactam structure-function studies and engineered a Y105W mutation into the active site of βla known to increase the cleavage efficiency of the enzyme [43-46] (Fig. (Fig.66 In summary, we have developed a codon-optimized catalytically improved βla-M based VLP system that can be used for henipaviral entry studies. The flexibility of using either colorimetric or cell permeant fluorimetric substrates in the same βla-M VLP system allows for efficient, quantitative, and more high throughput analyses of henipavirus fusion and entry characteristics that more closely reflect those of authentic viral particles. Whether βla-M can be complemented with other paramyxoviral envelopes remains to be determined, but such studies will provide information into the specificity of matrix-envelope interactions. Lastly, our results imply that such a codon-optimized, catalytically improved βla-M based entry system may be adapted to other viruses that possess a matrix protein primarily responsible for virion morphology and budding characteristics. Materials and methods Codon optimization and expression plasmids The codon-optimized NiV-F or HeV-F and NiV-G or HeV-G gene products were tagged at their C-termini with an AU1 or hemagglutinin (HA) tag, respectively, as previously described[37,39]. NiV-MWT was synthesized by Origene (Rockville, MD). GeneArt (Regensburg, Germany) performed mammalian codon-optimization of the NiV-M gene (M) product according to in-house proprietary software that addresses codon usage, elimination of cryptic splicing sites, as well as the stability of DNA/RNA secondary structures. NiV-M was subcloned into pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) between HindIII and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The sequence of the codon-optimized NiV-M has been deposited into GenBank (Accession: EU480491). Origene (Rockville, MD) codon-optimized the βla gene, which was then subcloned into a pVAX1 (Invitrogen) expression vector between the KpnI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The sequence of the mammalian codon-optimized βla has been deposited into GenBank (Accession: EU744548). The βla gene was fused upstream of the NiV-M gene by overlap PCR and subsequently cloned into pcDNA3.1 via flanking KpnI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites with a NotI restriction enzyme site engineered in between the two genes. A single Y105W amino acid mutation within the βla active site was introduced using site-directed mutagenesis with QuikChange™ (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). βlaY105W was then cloned into pcDNA3.1 via flanking KpnI and NotI restriction enzyme sites. All gene products were confirmed by sequencing. Antibody Production Production protocols to provide polyclonal antibodies (Rb. #2702, terminal bleed) via immunized rabbits (using a 20-mer antigenic peptide sequence corresponding to amino acids 29-49 of NiV-M) were generated by the Pinnacle Antibody Program (21st Century Biochemicals, Marlboro, MA). Monoclonal anti-HeV specific antibodies were produced by expressing HeV-F, HeV-G, and NiV-M in rabbits then isolating and screening specific anti-HeV lymphocytes from rabbit spleens as previously described for anti-NiV-F specific monoclonal antibodies[37]. Cell culture 293T cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Omega Scientific, Tarzana, CA). Vero cells were grown in minimal essential medium alpha (Invitrogen), containing 10% FBS. CHO stable cell lines expressing ephrinB2 or ephrinB3 were derived and maintained as previously described[9]. HMVECs were grown in EGM-2 media supplemented with the MV Bullet Kit (Cambrex, Baltimore, MD). 293T and Vero cells were purchased from the ATCC. HMVEC cells were a kind gift from R. Shao. Production of βla-M(NiV) VLPs βla-M expression plasmids (25 μg) and either NiV-F and G or HeV-F and G (10 μg each) or pcDNA3 (20 μg) expression plasmids were transfected into 10 cm dishes of 293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). At 24 h post-transfection, supernatants were collected and clarified before pelleting the VLPs at 110,000 g through a 20% sucrose (in PBS) cushion followed by resuspension in PBS (Invitrogen) containing 5% sucrose. Immunoblotting of VLP proteins βla-M VLP-containing supernatants were lysed and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and subsequently detected by immunoblotting using rabbit-anti-NiV-matrix (to detect all NiV-M proteins), goat-anti-HA-HRP (to detect all G proteins) (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), or mouse-anti-AU1 (to detect all F proteins) (Covance, Princeton, NJ) antibodies. Primary and secondary antibodies were used at 1:1,000 and 1:80,000 dilutions, respectively, or 1:10,000 for anti-HA-HRP followed by FEMTO (Pierce, Rockford, IL) detection. Due to the similar molecular weights of βla-M (~70 kDa) and NiV-G (~67 kDa), membranes were probed for NiV-M, NiV-F or HeV-F, and NiV-G or HeV-G individually. Electron microscopy 200-mesh Formvar carbon-coated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) were floated on drops of the NiV VLP suspensions at room temperature, then blotted and stained with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (UA) for NiV VLPs and 2% aqueous solution of phosphotungstic acid (PTA) for VSV particles. Electron microscopy studies were performed on a Philips 201 electron microscope at 70 kV. Quantification of βla-M VLP entry via FACS Aria Cells were plated into 24-well plates at a confluency of 75% and spinoculated (2,000 g) with βla-M VLPs for 2 h at 37°C. Although not required for efficient VLP entry, spinoculation has been shown to significantly improve the entry efficiency of several viruses (e.g. HIV, HHV-6, CMV) into target cells[55,56] and, indeed, improved the signal to noise ratio within our assay (data not shown). Target cells were then stained with CCF2-AM substrate according to the manufacturer recommendations (Panvera, Madison, WI). The enzymatic reaction was allowed to take place at 25°C for 18 h. The cells were then washed, resuspended in FACS-buffer (2% FBS in PBS) and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde. Cells were then acquired using FACS-Diva software on a FACS Aria machine (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) with excitation at 407 nm and emission at 520 nm and 447 nm. Samples were analyzed using FACS Convert and FCS Express v3 (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA). Soluble ephrinB1-Fc and ephrinB2-Fc fusion proteins were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Data were analyzed by GraphPad™ Prism Software (San Diego, CA) and represented as percentage infection (% blue positive cells). Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions MCW carried out or took part in all experiments, participated in the design and coordination of the study, performed statistical analyses, and wrote the manuscript. YW assisted with Western blot analyses and proofread the manuscript. ANF assisted with electron microscopy studies and proofread the manuscript. HCA assisted with antibody competition studies. MRH coordinated portions of the study, proofread the manuscript, and supervised electron microscopy studies. BL conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Additional file 1 Comparative codon usage table. Codon usage comparisons between wild-type Nipah matrix (henipavirus), beta-lactamase (bacteria) and average Homo sapiens genes. Click here for file(313K, pdf) Acknowledgements We thank members of the Lee lab, especially Jennifer Fulcher for technical assistance and Frederic Vigant for quintessential review of the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grants AI069317, AI060694, AI070495, and AI059051 to B.L. M.C.W. was supported by NIH grant AI07323 and the UCLA Warsaw Fellowship. We greatly appreciate all the time and wonderful assistance given from Stephanie Matyas at the Center For Aids Research flow cytometry core supported by NIH grants CA16042 and AI28697. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Med J Aust. 1995 Jun 19; 162(12):642-5.
[Med J Aust. 1995]J Virol. 2002 Nov; 76(22):11186-98.
[J Virol. 2002]J Virol. 2006 May; 80(10):4878-89.
[J Virol. 2006]Virus Res. 2004 Dec; 106(2):133-45.
[Virus Res. 2004]Cell. 1996 Mar 22; 84(6):941-51.
[Cell. 1996]Virol J. 2007 Jan 4; 4():1.
[Virol J. 2007]J Virol. 2006 Dec; 80(24):12070-8.
[J Virol. 2006]J Virol. 1999 Aug; 73(8):7035-8.
[J Virol. 1999]J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Sep 17; 125(37):11146-7.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2003]Science. 1998 Jan 2; 279(5347):84-8.
[Science. 1998]J Virol. 2005 Mar; 79(5):2988-97.
[J Virol. 2005]Virology. 2005 Jun 5; 336(2):291-8.
[Virology. 2005]J Virol. 1994 Jan; 68(1):441-7.
[J Virol. 1994]Virol J. 2007 Jan 4; 4():1.
[Virol J. 2007]Virol J. 2007 Jan 4; 4():1.
[Virol J. 2007]J Virol. 2006 Dec; 80(24):12070-8.
[J Virol. 2006]J Virol. 2006 May; 80(10):4878-89.
[J Virol. 2006]J Virol. 2007 May; 81(9):4520-32.
[J Virol. 2007]Am J Pathol. 2002 Dec; 161(6):2153-67.
[Am J Pathol. 2002]J Virol. 2002 Nov; 76(22):11186-98.
[J Virol. 2002]J Virol. 2007 Oct; 81(19):10804-14.
[J Virol. 2007]J Virol. 2007 May; 81(9):4520-32.
[J Virol. 2007]J Virol. 2007 May; 81(9):4520-32.
[J Virol. 2007]PLoS Pathog. 2006 Feb; 2(2):e7.
[PLoS Pathog. 2006]Virology. 2008 Mar 15; 372(2):357-71.
[Virology. 2008]J Virol. 2007 Oct; 81(19):10804-14.
[J Virol. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20; 101(16):6062-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 27; 342(17):1229-35.
[N Engl J Med. 2000]Biochem J. 1998 Mar 1; 330 ( Pt 2)():581-98.
[Biochem J. 1998]J Biol Chem. 2004 Oct 29; 279(44):46295-303.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Virus Res. 2004 Dec; 106(2):133-45.
[Virus Res. 2004]Cell. 1996 Mar 22; 84(6):941-51.
[Cell. 1996]J Virol. 2006 Dec; 80(24):12070-8.
[J Virol. 2006]Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Nov; 20(11):1151-4.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2002]J Virol. 2005 Jan; 79(2):918-26.
[J Virol. 2005]J Virol. 2003 Dec; 77(24):13433-8.
[J Virol. 2003]Virol J. 2007 Jan 4; 4():1.
[Virol J. 2007]J Virol. 2007 May; 81(9):4520-32.
[J Virol. 2007]J Virol. 1993 Jan; 67(1):360-5.
[J Virol. 1993]Nat Med. 2005 Jul; 11(7):786-90.
[Nat Med. 2005]Biochem J. 1998 Mar 1; 330 ( Pt 2)():581-98.
[Biochem J. 1998]J Biol Chem. 2004 Oct 29; 279(44):46295-303.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Virol. 2007 May; 81(9):4520-32.
[J Virol. 2007]J Virol. 2007 Oct; 81(19):10804-14.
[J Virol. 2007]J Virol. 2007 May; 81(9):4520-32.
[J Virol. 2007]PLoS Pathog. 2006 Feb; 2(2):e7.
[PLoS Pathog. 2006]J Virol Methods. 1989 Apr-May; 24(1-2):85-90.
[J Virol Methods. 1989]J Virol. 2000 Nov; 74(21):10074-80.
[J Virol. 2000]