![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 Steverding and Wang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Trypanocidal activity of the proteasome inhibitor and anti-cancer drug bortezomib 1BioMedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK Corresponding author.Dietmar Steverding: dsteverding/at/hotmail.com; Xia Wang: xiawang/at/hotmail.com Received June 21, 2009; Accepted July 7, 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract The proteasome inhibitor and anti-cancer drug bortezomib was tested for in vitro activity against bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei. The concentrations of bortezomib required to reduce the growth rate by 50% and to kill all trypanosomes were 3.3 nM and 10 nM, respectively. In addition, bortezomib was 10 times more toxic to trypanosomes than to human HL-60 cells. Moreover, exposure of trypanosomes to 10 nM bortezomib for 16 h was enough to kill 90% of the parasites following incubation in fresh medium. However, proteasomal peptidase activities of trypanosomes exposed to bortezomib were only inhibited by 10% and 30% indicating that the proteasome is not the main target of the drug. The results suggest that bortezomib may be useful as drug for the treatment of human African trypanosomiasis. Findings Human African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness is a fatal disease caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei. The parasites live and multiply extracellularly in the blood and tissue fluids in the human host and are transmitted by the bite of infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.). Millions of people living in 36 sub-Saharan countries are threatened with the disease and the estimated number of infected people is currently between 50,000 and 70,000 [1]. There are only four drugs available for chemotherapy of sleeping sickness and all show some degree of toxic side effects [2]. In addition, drug resistance in T. brucei is an increasing problem [3,4]. Moreover, at the turn of the millennium, the production of anti-sleeping sickness drugs was under threat as their manufacture was not profitable [5]. Thus, new strategies for the development of new drugs for treatment of sleeping sickness are urgently needed. One route for the discovery of new anti-sleeping sickness drugs is the screening of existing drugs for trypanocidal activities [6]. For example, agents that have been developed as potential anti-cancer drugs could also be of use against human African trypanosomiasis as has been shown for the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor eflornithine [7]. Proteasome inhibitors represent a new class of anti-cancer drugs and have recently been shown to display promising anti-trypanosomal activities [8-12]. In this study, we investigated the effect of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Fig. (Fig.1)1
The trypanocidal activity of bortezomib was determined with T. brucei bloodstream forms 427-221a while the general cytotoxicity of the drug was evaluated with human myeloid leukaemia HL-60 cells. The tests were analysed by the Alamar Blue assay as described previously [14]. In brief, cells were seeded in 24-well plates in a final volume of 1 ml of appropriate culture medium (trypanosomes: Baltz medium plus 16.7% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum [15]; HL-60 cells: RPMI 1640 plus 16.7% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum) containing various concentration of bortezomib and 1% DMSO. Wells containing medium and 1% DMSO served as controls. The initial densities were 104/ml for trypanosomes and 105/ml for HL-60 cells. After 24 h incubation, 100 μl Alamar Blue (11.11 mg resazurin sodium salt in 100 ml PBS) was added and the cells were incubated for a further 48 h so that the total incubation time was 72 h. Then, the plates were read on a microplate reader using a test wavelength of 570 nm and a reference wavelength of 630 nm. The 50% growth inhibition (GI50) values, i.e. the concentration of the drug necessary to reduce the growth rate of trypanosomes and HL-60 cells by 50% to that of controls, was determined by linear interpolation according to the method described in [16]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, i.e. the concentration of the drug at which all trypanosomes and HL-60 cells were killed, was determined microscopically. Bortezomib showed a dose-dependent effect on the growth of T. brucei bloodstream forms with a GI50 value of 3.3 nM and a MIC value of 10 nM (Fig. (Fig.2).2
To check whether the trypanocidal activity of bortezomib is due to inhibition of the proteasome, the activity of this multi-enzyme complex in trypanosomes exposed to the drug was determined. In this experiment, 107 trypanosomes/ml were incubated with or without 100 μM bortezomib for 2 h. After washing three times with PBS/1% glucose, the trypanosomes were lysed in 10 mM Tris, 2 mM ATP, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7, 1 mM DTT, 0.2% NP-40 and centrifuged at 16000 × g. The chymotrypsin-like activity and the trypsin-like activity of the clarified supernatant were assayed in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 with 10 μM Suc-LLVY-AMC and 10 μM Z-GGR-AMC, respectively. Surprisingly, bortezomib inhibited the chymotrypsin-like activity and the trypsin-like activity of the proteasome in trypanosomes only by 30% and 10%, respectively. Under the same experimental conditions, the drug inhibited the proteasomal chymotrypsin-like and trypsin-like activity in HL-60 cells by 100% and 90%, respectively. These findings indicate that the trypanocidal action of bortezomib is most likely not the result from inactivation of the proteasome. For treatment of multiple myeloma, the recommended dose and treatment schedule of bortezomib is 1.3 mg/m2 administered as a 3 to 5 second bolus intravenous injection on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a three week cycle, for up to 8 cycles [18]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies showed that on day 11 the mean plasma concentration of bortezomib falls from 422 nM to 10 nM within 16 h of administration of the drug [19]. As 10 nM is the MIC value of bortezomib, we wanted to investigate whether exposure of trypanosomes to 10 nM of the drug for 16 h is long enough to kill the parasites. To this end, 5 × 105 trypanosomes/ml were treated with or without 10 nM bortezomib for 16 h, then diluted to 104 cells/ml in fresh medium for further incubation and counted every 24 h using a Neubauer haemocytometer. For the first 48 h of re-incubation, the densities of cultures containing trypanosomes that had been exposed to bortezomib decreased continuously (Fig. (Fig.3).3
In conclusion, bortezomib has been shown to display substantial trypanocidal activity. The current therapy regime of bortezomib to treat cancer is probably not applicable for treatment of sleeping sickness. The results of this study indicate that a shorter treatment regime with a higher dosage may be appropriate. Importantly, bortezomib can be also administered subcutaneously [19] whereas most of the current anti-sleeping sickness drugs have to be given intraveneously [21]. Before developing bortezomib as an anti-sleeping sickness drug, animal experiments would need to be performed to establish the in vivo efficacy of this proteasome inhibitor. However, a selectivity index of 10 may be regarded as insufficient for proceeding to animal experiments. The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases at the World Health Organization (WHO/TDR) recommends a selectivity index of >100 to pursue such animal studies [22]. Compared with normal cells, however, the cytotoxicity of bortezomib determined for HL-60 cells may be overestimated. In addition, bortezomib may serve as a lead for the development of analogues with improved selectivity. Another possibility would be to use bortezomib in combination with the current drugs to treat sleeping sickness. Such drug combination regimes may lead to synergistic effects, in which lower amounts of drugs sufficient to kill the parasites would lead to a reduction in toxicity. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions XW and DS carried out the experiments. DS conceived the study and prepared the final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements We thank Dr Penelope Powell for critical reading of the manuscript. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
Parasit Vectors. 2008 Feb 12; 1(1):3.
[Parasit Vectors. 2008]Trends Parasitol. 2003 Nov; 19(11):488-94.
[Trends Parasitol. 2003]Microbes Infect. 2001 Jul; 3(9):763-70.
[Microbes Infect. 2001]Drug Resist Updat. 2007 Feb-Apr; 10(1-2):30-50.
[Drug Resist Updat. 2007]Nat Med. 2002 Sep; 8(9):908-9.
[Nat Med. 2002]Parasitol Today. 2000 Jan; 16(1):7-9.
[Parasitol Today. 2000]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun; 46(6):2038-40.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002]Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Jul 1; 65(13):1221-31.
[Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008]Planta Med. 2001 Oct; 67(7):623-7.
[Planta Med. 2001]EMBO J. 1985 May; 4(5):1273-7.
[EMBO J. 1985]Acta Trop. 1993 Dec; 55(4):257-61.
[Acta Trop. 1993]Cancer Res. 1999 Jun 1; 59(11):2615-22.
[Cancer Res. 1999]Haematologica. 2008 Dec; 93(12):1908-11.
[Haematologica. 2008]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995 Mar; 70(1-2):157-66.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995]Haematologica. 2008 Dec; 93(12):1908-11.
[Haematologica. 2008]Acta Trop. 1993 Sep; 54(3-4):153-62.
[Acta Trop. 1993]Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006 Nov; 5(11):941-55.
[Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006]