![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the Genetics Society of America Evolution in Candida albicans Populations During a Single Passage Through a Mouse Host *Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 and †Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 1Corresponding author: Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Bldg., 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108-1098. E-mail: gmay/at/umn.edu Communicating editor: J. Lawrence Received March 27, 2009; Accepted April 29, 2009. Abstract The mechanisms and rates by which genotypic and phenotypic variation is generated in opportunistic, eukaryotic pathogens during growth in hosts are not well understood. We evaluated genomewide genetic and phenotypic evolution in Candida albicans, an opportunistic fungal pathogen of humans, during passage through a mouse host (in vivo) and during propagation in liquid culture (in vitro). We found slower population growth and higher rates of chromosome-level genetic variation in populations passaged in vivo relative to those grown in vitro. Interestingly, the distribution of long-range loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and chromosome rearrangement events across the genome differed for the two growth environments, while rates of short-range LOH were comparable for in vivo and in vitro populations. Further, for the in vivo populations, there was a positive correlation of cells demonstrating genetic alterations and variation in colony growth and morphology. For in vitro populations, no variation in growth phenotypes was detected. Together, our results demonstrate that passage through a living host leads to slower growth and higher rates of genomic and phenotypic variation compared to in vitro populations. Results suggest that the dynamics of population growth and genomewide rearrangement contribute to the maintenance of a commensal and opportunistic life history of C. albicans. OPPORTUNISTIC pathogens such as Candida albicans often reside in the host as benign, commensal organisms until the immune system is weakened. In patients undergoing organ transplants or chemotherapy, or when indigenous competitors are eliminated upon antibiotic treatment, opportunistic pathogens may gain access to vulnerable tissues, causing death in ≤50% of infected patients (Wilson et al. 2002). Consequently, it is important to understand the genetic mechanisms underlying the survival and adaptation of opportunistic pathogens to growth in host environments (Margolis and Levin 2007). Here, we used a genomewide array of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to characterize the rates of genetic and phenotypic evolution accompanying the growth of C. albicans in contact with a mammalian host and compared these to rates of evolution during in vitro growth. Genome evolution during interactions with hosts varies considerably across different microbial pathogens. The specific genome rearrangements leading to phase change and antigenic switching that allow pathogens to evade host immune responses are well described for only a few pathogens such as trypanosomes (Borst and Rudenko 1994) and Plasmodium (Kyes et al. 2001). Obligate intracellular symbiotic microbes, such as Buchnera (Moran 1996) and Pneumocystis (Strobel and Arnold 2004), propagate asexually and often carry a minimal but stable genome, making them wholly dependent on life within their hosts (Wren 2000). Although both opportunistic and obligate pathogens commonly propagate by asexual means, these organisms often maintain large genomes and generate substantial genomic and phenotypic variation via genome rearrangements (Victoir and Dujardin 2002; Kline et al. 2003) and heritable silencing at telomeres (Cross et al. 1998; Borst 2002; Gupta 2005). Given that many commensal and apparently harmless symbionts may become invasive pathogens in immunocompromised hosts, the mechanisms underlying the maintenance of genetic variation and of the commensal state bear investigation (Levin et al. 2000). As the most common commensal fungus of the human microbial flora, C. albicans provides a model for the study of opportunistic pathogens because it reproduces primarily asexually and demonstrates a high degree of genetic and genomic variability among isolates (Cowen et al. 1999; Iwaguchi et al. 2000; Joly et al. 2002; Pujol et al. 2002; Legrand et al. 2004). The complete genome sequence revealed high levels of heterozygosity (~4%) across the 16-Mb diploid genome (Jones et al. 2004; van het Hoog et al. 2007), and population-level variation has been demonstrated in clinical populations from different continents, regions, hospitals, and families (Forche et al. 1999; Pujol et al. 2002; Bougnoux et al. 2006). However, the genome and population processes underlying observed variation in host populations is not well understood. Appreciable rates of mitotic recombination estimated at specific genome regions (Lephart et al. 2005; Lephart and Magee 2006) and in repetitive regions (Zhang et al. 2003) have been evaluated primarily from in vitro cultures. Chromosomal variation as well as point mutations accumulate rapidly in populations evolving resistance to azole antifungal drugs (Selmecki et al. 2006; Coste et al. 2007), and in a few cases, the evolution of a pathogen within the same individual has been studied over the time course of antifungal drug treatment (Lopez-Ribot et al. 1998; Marr et al. 1998; Coste et al. 2007; Selmecki et al. 2008). Together, clinical studies reveal the accumulation of variation in host-associated populations, but the evolutionary relationship among isolates is not clear, and the number of isolates obtained during the course of infection are insufficient to allow a comprehensive view of population dynamics. With the goal of understanding mechanisms by which genetic and phenotypic variation arise as a pathogen propagates in its host, we tracked genomewide dynamics in C. albicans populations during passage through a susceptible host (in vivo) and compared results to populations propagated in liquid culture (in vitro). We first asked if population growth rates differ when cells are grown in a mammalian host relative to when they are grown in liquid culture. We then compared the rates and types of short- and long-range loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events that arose during in vivo relative to in vitro propagation. Finally, we determined the rates and types of phenotypic variation in colony growth that arose during in vivo and in vitro propagation. To conduct the analyses, we exploited the counterselectable marker GAL1, measured recombination as LOH using genomewide SNPs, and evaluated changes in chromosome copy number using competitive genome hybridization (CGH) (Forche et al. 2005; Selmecki et al. 2005). We found fivefold lower population growth rates and distinctly different genome dynamics arising in response to growth in vivo compared to growth in vitro. Furthermore, we found that variation in C. albicans colony size and morphology arose during in vivo propagation only and was positively associated with short-range and chromosome-level recombination events. Taken together, our results suggest that passage through a mammalian host is accompanied by slow population growth and elevated levels of genetic and phenotypic variation relative to the rates of variation observed with propagation in the laboratory. MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains and media used in this study: To study recombination events across the entire C. albicans genome, we used a system with two components: a heterozygous counterselectable GAL1 marker that permitted selection of isolates in which LOH at GAL1 had occurred and 123 SNP loci positioned ~100 kb apart across most of the genome (Table 1; supporting information, Table S1). C. albicans strain AF7 is a derivative of sequenced strain SC5314 in which one copy of GAL1 was replaced with URA3 to generate the GAL1/gal1 heterozygous locus (GAL1/Δgal1 URA3) (Forche et al. 2003). Gal+ strains are sensitive to 2-deoxygalactose (2DGS) because metabolism of 2DG results in a toxic product (Platt 1984) but grow on media with galactose as the sole carbon source. Gal− cells lack a functional GAL1 locus and are 2DG resistant (2DGR), but do not grow on media with galactose as the sole carbon source.
Colonies of C. albicans were routinely grown on the nonselective YEPD medium (1% yeast extract, 1% yeast peptone, 2% glucose; 1.5% agar for plate cultures). To distinguish between Gal− (2DGR) and Gal+ (2DGS) phenotypes, strains are plated onto a synthetic 2-deoxygalactose medium (2DG; 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 0.1% 2-deoxygalactose, 1.5% agar) and counterselected on synthetic galactose medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% galactose, 1.5% agar). In vivo populations: In a previous study, 106 cells of the parent strain AF7 (GAL1/Δgal1 URA3) were injected into the tail vein of 13 outbred ICR male mice (22–25 g; Harlan, Indianapolis) (Forche et al. 2003). Mice were observed and, when moribund at 5–7 days, anesthetized using isofluorane and euthanized, and both kidneys were removed. Kidneys were combined, homogenized with 1 ml of water, and dilutions at 1:1000 of the kidney homogenate were plated onto YEPD medium to obtain total colony counts. The same homogenate was diluted 1:10 and plated onto 2DG medium to obtain Gal− colony counts at 3 days. At 3 days, Gal− colonies arising by mutation do not grow to an observable size but colonies are apparent for a control Δgal1/Δgal1 strain. (Forche et al. 2003).In vitro populations: To generate in vitro populations, strain AF7 was streaked out on synthetic galactose medium and grown 2 days at 30° to obtain single colonies, which were removed and transferred to each of 20, 5 ml YEPD liquid cultures (Beckerman et al. 2001; Spell and Jinks-Robertson 2004; Mookerjee and Sia 2006). These were grown for 16 hr in a roller tube incubator at 30°. The cultures were spun down, washed once with sterile water, and resuspended in 1 ml of sterile water. The resuspended cells were then plated onto YEPD plates at 10−7 dilutions and grown at 30° for 2 days to obtain the total cell count and plated on 2DG plates at 10−3 dilution and grown at 30° to obtain a count of Gal− colonies at 3 days. Diagnostic PCR to determine GAL1 status: Diagnostic PCRs were carried out using primers flanking the GAL1 locus to determine if Gal− phenotypes (2DGR) obtained in the above experiments were due to loss of the remaining GAL1 copy or due to mutation in the GAL1 ORF. Primers gal1-detF, ura3-detR, and 2020 were used for upstream and primers 2278, 2279, and 2280 were used for downstream diagnostic PCR (Table S1). Total genomic DNA extractions were carried out as described previously (Beckerman et al. 2001). PCRs were carried out in a total volume of 25 μl with 10 mm Tris–HCl (pH 8.0); 50 mm KCl; 3 mm MgCl2; 100 μm each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 2.5 units Taq polymerase (rTaq, TAKARA); either 5 or 10 μmol of each primer (see Table S1); and 30 ng of genomic DNA under the following conditions: initial denaturation for 3 min at 94°, 30 cycles of a denaturation step for 1 min at 94°, a primer annealing step for 30 sec at 54°, and an extension step for 1 min at 72°. The final extension step was 5 min at 72°. PCR fragments were size fractionated on agarose gels [1% in 1× TBE (0.89 m Tris; 0.02 m EDTA–NA2H2O; 0.89 m boric acid)] and compared to the size of products from positive control strains [SC5314 (GAL1/GAL1) and AF7 (GAL1/gal1Δ)] and the negative control strain [AF27 (Δgal1/Δ gal1)] (Forche et al. 2003). Population growth rate: For in vivo experimental populations, we used two methods to obtain estimates of net population growth rate and the number of cell divisions. First, we obtained and analyzed published results from a careful time-course experiment tracking C. albicans population growth in vivo (MacCallum and Odds 2004). Our study used strain genotypes and inoculation cell numbers comparable to those used in that study (MacCallum and Odds: SC5314 at 5 × 104 cells/g body weight of BALB/c mice; our study: AF7 at 4 × 104 cells/g body weight of ICR mice), both with tail-vein infection. Strain AF7 is derived from SC5314, is prototrophic, shows no growth rate differences, and is not attenuated in virulence in comparison to SC5314 (Forche et al. 2003). Numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) in kidney tissues over time were log transformed and regressed against time (minutes) in Microsoft Excel 2004, version 11.3.7. Obtaining an increasing function, the slope of the regression of ln(cell number) vs. time for the period of 2–72 hr after inoculation provided an estimate of the intrinsic population growth rate, r. The number of cells generated per parent cell during time, t, of increasing growth was calculated as ert, and the number of doublings (cell divisions) was calculated by solving for x = log2(ert). A second estimate of population growth in vivo was made using total colony counts from homogenized kidney tissue and by estimating the number of doublings (cell divisions) required to produce the observed increases in cell numbers: x = log2(ert). We assumed a bottleneck population size as a fraction of the final population size (MacCallum and Odds (2004) to estimate starting population sizes in the kidney. For in vitro experimental populations, cell numbers at the start and end of population growth were counted as CFUs on YEPD plates and population growth rates were estimated as described above for in vivo experiments. Rates of LOH at GAL1: For both the in vivo and in vitro experiments, we used Lea and Coulson's (1949) method of the median to estimate the rate at which the heterozygous GAL1/Δgal1 (2DGS) locus is converted to the homozygous state, Δgal1/Δgal1 (2DGR). The method uses the variance among independent cultures for the proportion of 2DGR cells generated relative to the total number of cells generated over the same time to estimate the rates of the event per generation (Table S2). The method accounts for differences of in vitro and in vivo growth rates and permits direct comparison of LOH rates at GAL1. SNP microarray analysis: We expanded a previously described SNP microarray (Forche et al. 2005), adding 98 SNP loci to cover a total of 123 SNP loci (Table 1). The SNP loci are positioned ~100 kb apart across the eight C. albicans chromosomes except for regions of low polymorphism in the fully sequenced genome of strain SC5314 (Chr3 right arm, Chr7 left arm, and telomere distal regions of ChrR (van het Hoog et al. 2007). Design of allele-specific oligonucleotides, probe generation, slide preparation and hybridization, and data analysis was performed as described earlier (Forche et al. 2005). Four multiplex PCR reactions with 28–34 primer pairs/reaction (Table S1) were carried out for each C. albicans isolate, using 60 ng of genomic DNA and a Qiagen Multiplex PCR kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The SNP genotypes were determined using the allelic fraction (AF), which describes the relative intensity of the control probe (SC5314: labeled with Cy5) compared to the experimental probe (test strain: labeled with Cy3) in competitive hybridizations to the microarray according to the protocol detailed in Forche et al. (2005). The AF values are normalized to give an expected value of 0.5 for heterozygous loci. The distribution of AF values for homozygous and heterozygous loci and the cutoff values to score homozygous states were as described previously (Forche et al. 2005). For each individual SNP locus, AF values between 0.40 and 0.60, inclusive, were scored as heterozygous, AF values <0.40 were scored as allele 1 homozygous, and AF values >0.60 were scored as allele 2 homozygous. We used SNP genotypes and information on their physical linkage to infer chromosome-level rearrangement and altered ploidy. Individual SNP loci were scored as potentially homozygous, heterozygous, or trisomic by AF values as follows: 0–0.342 (homozygous for a1); 0.343–0.422 (trisomy; two copies of a1 and one copy of a2); 0.423–0.573 (heterozygous; a1/a2); 0.574–0.657 (trisomy; 2 copies of a2 and 1 copy of a1); and 0.658–1.0 (homozygous for a2) (data not shown). Where AF values suggested altered ploidy at linked SNP loci over large segments or entire chromosomes, we confirmed ploidy levels using CGH (Selmecki et al. 2005; Legrand et al. 2008) as described below. Genomic distribution of short-range LOH events: For in vivo and in vitro populations, we counted the number of short-range LOH events occurring on each chromosome and compared the observed number of LOH events to that expected for a random distribution across the genome within each population. We tested the significance of higher or lower numbers of observed events compared to that expected using a binomial test (Sokal and Rolf 1981) with an expected value set at the average number. Because the number of events detected is very low relative to the number of loci evaluated and because the binomial test lacks power, we also conducted a permutation test. Here, we randomly permuted loci (columns in Table S3) across all chromosomes and divided columns into “chromosomes” with the same number of loci as in the empirical data set. Repeating permutations, we generated 1000 random distribution data sets. Significance was evaluated as the number of times that the observed number of events occurred in the permuted data sets, divided by 1000, the total number of randomized data sets. Comparative genome hybridization: Comparative genome hybridization uses a microarray format with probes for all of the ~6800 C. albicans ORFs and detects changes in gene copy number using hybridization signal intensity (Selmecki et al. 2005). CGH was carried out as described previously (Selmecki et al. 2005) using strains SC5314 and AF7 as heterozygous, disomic reference strains. An updated version of the Ch_map program, provided by Sven Bergmann (Selmecki et al. 2005), was used to visualize combined SNP and CGH results. Colony growth phenotype: Colonies obtained from experimental populations were streaked for single colonies on YEPD plates, and colony morphology was scored as follows: the parental colony phenotype (PT) that is indistinguishable from that of AF7, the small colony phenotype (Sm), and the wrinkly colony phenotype (Wr). In addition, isolates were grown for 2 days at 23°, 32°, and 37° in duplicate YEPD plates. Strains that formed wrinkled colonies at all three temperatures were designated as “wrinkling not regulated by temperature” (Wr-N-R). Strains that formed smooth yeast colonies at 23° and formed filamentous, wrinkled colonies at 32° and 37° were designated as “wrinkling that is temperature regulated” (Wr-T-R). The frequency of each phenotype in experimental populations was recorded, and plates were photographed. RESULTS Our overall goal was to estimate and compare rates at which genetic and phenotypic variation is generated in C. albicans populations propagated in vivo and in vitro. From the in vivo experimental populations, 96 single-colony isolates (strains) were obtained from nonselective YEPD plates (Gal+, 2DGS) and 474 strains were isolated from 2DG plates (Gal−, 2DGR) for further study. From the in vitro experiments, 20 2DGR strains were isolated to serve as a control population (Figure 1
In vivo populations: We estimated the total CFUs at 8.0 × 104–1.7 × 106 cells/g kidney across kidneys of 13 infected mice (Forche et al. 2004). Because kidney tissues were thoroughly homogenized, we assumed that each CFU represented a single nucleate hyphal or yeast cell. We estimated the proportion of cells that had undergone LOH at the GAL1 locus (2DGR) at 8.7 × 10−5–1.7 × 10−2/cell for all mice. Among 474 2DGR isolates, 65 (13.7%) exhibited colony phenotypes different from that of the parent AF7, and the remainder demonstrated AF7 PTs. The altered colony phenotypes included Sm colonies due to slow growth and Wr colonies due to filamentous cell growth compared to AF7 (Figure 1 In vitro populations: The proportion of cells that had undergone LOH at the GAL1 locus during in vitro propagation was 3.2 × 10−5–1.1 × 10−4/cell across the 20 independent YEPD cultures. No altered growth phenotypes were detected among ~7500 colonies grown on YEPD or on 2DG plates after in vitro propagation (Figure 1 Population growth rates in vivo: We employed two different approaches to estimate growth rates for in vivo populations, and these yielded similar results. We report net population growth rates because rates of birth and death cannot be separately estimated. First, we estimated the population growth rate and the number of cell divisions using the published results of a careful time-course study (MacCallum and Odds 2004). These data show that most C. albicans cells are cleared from the blood and that population numbers in the kidney greatly decline during the first 2 hr after inoculation (MacCallum and Odds 2004). The estimated population bottleneck size was 0.45% of the final population size at 2 hr. After 2 hr, populations in the kidneys demonstrated log growth, and the slope of the regression of ln(cell number) vs. time for the period of 2–72 hr after inoculation (Figure 2
Second, we assumed a bottleneck population size at 0.45% of the final population size for our experimental in vivo populations and then calculated the average net increase in cell numbers required to obtain final population sizes of 2.2 × 102 cells/cell/g kidney. The estimated number of cell divisions is log2 (220) = 7.8 cell divisions/parent cell in the population, a value similar to that obtained above. Rates of cell division are slower in vivo than in vitro: The average rate of cell division for in vivo populations estimated from data of MacCallum and Odds (2004) is 8.3 cell divisions over 70 hr, or 0.12 generations/hr. From our experimental in vivo data, we estimated a rate of 7.8 cell divisions over 5 days, or 0.065 generations/hr, which is even slower. For in vitro populations, we used direct counts of total CFUs before and after growth in liquid culture to estimate an average 9.9 cell divisions/parent cell and an average rate of cell division over the 16-hr experiment at 0.62 divisions/hr. Thus, net population growth rates were 5- to 10-fold slower in vivo than in vitro. Rates of recombination at GAL1 are higher in vivo than in vitro: For both the in vivo and in vitro populations, we used Lea and Coulson's (1949) method of the median to estimate the rate at which the heterozygous GAL1/Δgal1 locus is converted to the homozygous state, Δgal1/Δgal1 (Table 2; Table S2). For the in vivo populations, we estimated the total CFUs at 8.0 × 104–1.7 × 106 cells/g kidney across the 13 mouse populations. We estimated the proportion of cells that had undergone LOH at the GAL1 locus to generate 2DGR cells at 8.7 × 10−5–1.7 × 10−2/cell across the 13 mouse populations and rates of LOH at GAL1 at 1.7 × 10−4 (±2.12 × 10−4 SD) events/generation.
For the 20 in vitro cultures, we estimated the proportion of cells that had undergone LOH at the GAL1 locus at 3.2 × 10−5–1.1 × 10−4/cell across cultures and the rates of LOH at 6.0 × 10−6 (±2.0 × 10−6 SD) events/generation. Thus, the rate of recombination at GAL1 is ~28-fold greater during in vivo growth than during in vitro growth (Table 2). Rates of LOH at individual SNP loci are similar in vivo and in vitro: For in vivo-propagated populations, we determined whole-genome SNP genotypes for 73 strains that were chosen to represent the range of observed 2DG and colony morphology phenotypes. We analyzed SNP genotypes for 20 2DGS and 53 2DGR strains, and among these 2DGR strains, we analyzed SNPs for 24 strains with altered colony phenotypes (Sm and Wr) and 29 strains with PT phenotypes. For the in vitro populations, we analyzed 20 2DGR isolates (Figure 1 After first determining that the LOH events located in genomes of different isolates obtained from the same mouse represented independent events, we counted 16 short-range LOH events over the 7442 individual SNP loci for which unambiguous data were obtained (Table S3); Of these, 15 altered only a single SNP locus and one longer recombination event spanned three contiguous SNP loci on Chr4 (Table 3). Assuming that each cell represents an average of 7.8–8.3 mitotic cell divisions, the estimated rate is 2.5 × 10−4 short-range LOH events/locus/generation (±5.2 × 10−4 SD). To determine the sensitivity of the estimate to the population evaluated, we analyzed results for only the 2DGR strains where 15 events were observed. The calculated rate is slightly higher at 3.3 × 10−4 events/locus/generation (±5.8 × 10−4 SD). Both estimates are comparable to the rate of LOH at GAL1 during in vivo growth that we obtained above (1.7 × 10−4 events/generation).
For the in vitro-propagated populations, we detected seven LOH events at single SNP loci and no events composed of multiple SNP loci over the 2012 individual SNP loci for which unambiguous data were obtained. Assuming that each cell represents an average of 9.9 mitotic cell divisions, we obtained a rate of 3.5 × 10−4 short-range LOH events/locus/generation (±2.4 × 10−5 SD) (Table 2). We conclude that the average rates of short-range LOH due to recombination and independent of those occurring at GAL1 are not significantly different for in vivo and in vitro populations. Genomewide distribution of short-range LOH events: We next evaluated separately the distribution of short-range LOH events across chromosomes for in vivo and in vitro propagated populations (Figure 3
For the in vitro-propagated populations, short-range LOH events were less evenly distributed across chromosomes than for in vivo strains. LOH occurred primarily on the larger chromosomes, Chr1, Chr2, Chr3, and Chr4, although no events were detected on the second largest chromosome (ChrR) or on the smaller chromosomes (Chr5, Chr6, and Chr7) (Figure 3 Comparing the results for in vivo and in vitro populations, it is apparent that the distribution of short-range LOH events differs (Figure 3 Chromosome-level changes were observed for in vivo, but for not in vitro, populations: We inferred long-range chromosome-level rearrangement events when AF values for SNP loci and CGH results demonstrated changes spanning all or most of a chromosome (Selmecki et al. 2005). Importantly, we detected six long-range events in isolates from in vivo populations (AF617, AF3976, AF3977 for ChrR; AF21, AF540, AF3990 for Chr2) but no long-range events in isolates from in vitro populations. The six long-range events that we detected involved two chromosomes, ChrR and Chr2 (Tables 2 and 3). For ChrR, we recovered two strains with disomic, homozygous ChrR and one strain carrying a trisomic ChrR. Homozygous disomy for ChrR was inferred for strains AF617 and AF3976 because the AF values at most individual SNP loci were close to either 0 or 1, indicating that the entire ChrR was homozygous (Table S3). CGH analysis for these same strains demonstrated that ChrR was present in two copies (Figure 4
Trisomy was inferred for ChrR of strain AF3977 because most SNP loci demonstrated AF values at either ~0.3 or ~0.7, which is intermediate between that expected for heterozygous loci (~0.5) and that expected for homozygous loci (~0 or 1) (Table S3). CGH analyses confirmed that ChrR is trisomic (Figure 4A For Chr2, we recovered three different strains demonstrating chromosome-level events (Figure 4B
In summary, all six chromosome-level recombination events were recovered from in vivo propagated strains, and these involved only two chromosomes, ChrR and Chr2 (Tables 2 and 3). Among these six long-range LOH events, we found two cases of whole-chromosome trisomy (one for ChrR and one for Chr2), three cases of chromosome homolog loss with duplication of the remaining homolog by reduplication or nondisjunction, and one case in which most of one chromosome arm likely underwent BIR or a single crossover (Kraus et al. 2001) (Tables 2 and 3). The in vivo rate of long-range chromosome-level events was estimated at 1.2 × 10−3 events/chromosome/cell division (±4.3 × 10−3 SD) among the 584 chromosomes evaluated, an order of magnitude higher than the rate of short-range LOH events in this same population. Chromosome-level events were not detected among the 160 chromosomes evaluated from in vitro-propagated isolates (Tables 2 and 3). LOH at GAL1 is associated with recovery of additional rearrangement events: We asked whether LOH at GAL1, detected by 2DG selection, was associated with recovery of genome rearrangement events occurring independently of those at the GAL1 locus. Among the in vivo-propagated strains, we performed SNP analysis on 53 2DGR and 20 2DGS strains. Among the 2DGR isolates, we found 14 short-range LOH events covering a single SNP locus, one event covering three SNPs, and six chromosome-level events described above. In the 20 2DGS strains, we detected only a single SNP LOH event, on ChrR, in strain AF656 (Table 3). From the in vitro-propagated populations, 20 2DGR strains demonstrated seven different LOH events at single SNP loci and no chromosome-level events. An association test showed that genome rearrangement events were significantly associated with 2DGR strains (Gstat = 6.23, d.f. = 1, P = 0.01). From the data available, we cannot determine if events at GAL1 and other SNP loci or chromosomes occurred in the same cell cycle or at different times during cell division in the host. Nonetheless, the 2DG selection for strains exhibiting LOH at GAL1 yields strains that have undergone additional LOH events at other loci and chromosomes. Altered colony phenotypes arose during in vivo but not in vitro propagation: We next determined the rate at which altered colony growth phenotypes arose and the relationship between these phenotypes and genomewide genetic changes. For the in vivo populations, when grown at 32°, 65 of the 474 2DGR isolates (13.7%) exhibited colony growth phenotypes different from that of parent strain AF7 (“PT” in Figure 5
In striking contrast to the in vivo populations, we did not observe altered colony phenotypes among >7000 colonies observed during the in vitro experiment. Although filamentous colony phenotypes are detected occasionally during routine maintenance of SC5314 and its derivative strains, these events are rarely observed with growth at 32°. We discount the explanation that 2DG media is mutagenic and leads to increased rates of LOH and phenotypic variation because the in vitro-propagated cells that were subjected to 2DG media did not show elevated rates of LOH or phenotypic variation. Thus, the higher rate of altered colony phenotypes observed in strains from in vivo propagation and selected on 2DG is attributable to different growth conditions in vivo compared to those in vitro, and not to the 2DG selection itself. Genome rearrangement is associated with altered colony phenotypes: We examined the relationship of altered colony phenotypes and genome rearrangement within the data set for in vivo populations. Using the goodness-of-fit test, there is a significant association between altered colony phenotypes (Sm, Wr) and 2DGR phenotypes relative to 2DGS phenotypes (Gstat = 19.45, d.f. = 3, P = 0.01). We then evaluated the relationship of altered colony phenotypes (Sm, Wr) and those short-range and chromosome-level LOH events at loci other than GAL1. We found that altered phenotypes were significantly and positively associated with LOH events while the PT smooth colony phenotype was more often associated with the absence of detected LOH events than would be expected by chance (Table 4). Examining the specific events and strains, we found that four of the five strains in which LOH occurred along an entire chromosome also exhibited an altered colony phenotype. For ChrR, homozygous haplotype 1 (strain AF3976) was associated with the Sm phenotype while homozygous haplotype 2 (strain AF617) was associated with the Wr-T-R phenotype (Figure 5 We also detected changes in colony phenotype associated with chromosome-level changes on Chr2. Homozygous haplotype 1 is associated with the Wr-N-R colony phenotype (strain AF3990), and trisomy of Chr2 with two copies of haplotype 2 is associated with the Wr-T-R colony phenotype (strain AF540) (Figure 5 Synthesizing results for LOH at GAL1, rearrangement events independent of GAL1, and altered colony phenotypes, we find that altered colony phenotypes are observed more frequently in strains that have undergone at least one LOH event at GAL1 but that the underlying cause of altered colony phenotypes is additional, GAL1-independent LOH events. A large proportion of isolates with altered colony phenotypes also had undergone chromosomal changes via short-range LOH events (11/17, or 65%) or chromosome-level events (4/6, or 80%) (Table 4). Overall, our results show that the choice of isolates with altered colony phenotypes increased the detection of genome changes and are consistent with findings that LOH at many different loci influences filamentous growth in C. albicans (Uhl et al. 2003). DISCUSSION Opportunistic pathogens often live as commensal associates of plants and animals, becoming dangerous infectious agents when host defenses are weakened or new virulence types arise by mutation (Margolis and Levin 2007). Since many of these microbial pathogens propagate asexually, understanding the mechanisms by which opportunistic pathogen populations respond to host environments is essential to developing effective disease control and antifungal therapy and to understanding the fundamental evolutionary question of how adaptation occurs in asexual lineages. Here, we report differing types and distribution of recombination events across the genome for in vivo- vs. in vitro-propagated populations and that altered colony growth phenotypes arose only within the in vivo populations. Our results demonstrate that C. albicans populations generate considerably more phenotypic and genetic variation during growth in a living host than in the relatively benign environment of in vitro culture. Net population growth rates are 5- to 10-fold lower in vivo than in vitro. Immediately after C. albicans is introduced into the mouse host, population sizes dramatically decline in the bloodstream and kidneys and subsequently expand exponentially in the kidney, causing renal failure and death (Odds et al. 2000; MacCallum and Odds 2004). Because log growth is density independent, the results suggest that the slower growth trajectory characteristic of in vivo populations is less likely a result of direct competition among C. albicans cells and more likely a result of higher cell mortality due to the host immune response or slower cell division due to nutrient limitations (Barelle et al. 2006; Bernardis et al. 2007). The linear growth rate of pseudohyphal and hyphal cells (Hausauer et al. 2005) may also contribute to slower population growth in the in vivo environment. Slower growth in vivo is not surprising; the result is important because relative rates of genetic change can be evaluated and because of the empirical insight provided into the population dynamics of an important pathogen. We found that average rates of LOH at individual SNP loci across the genome are quite similar for in vivo and in vitro populations (~10−4 events/generation). Yet the distribution of events differed with greater numbers of short-range LOH events on Chr1 for in vivo populations and on Chr3 for in vitro-propagated populations than expected for a random distribution across all SNP loci and chromosomes. Higher rates of LOH at the GAL1 locus on Chr1 were observed during in vivo growth than during in vitro growth. Loss of the URA3 gene with LOH at the engineered GAL1 locus could lead to lower virulence (Staab and Sundstrom 2003), but such an effect should decrease, rather than increase, the recovery of Gal− strains. Previous results show little evidence that URA3 copy number affected survival in our experimental system (Forche et al. 2003). The results show that the growth environment strongly affects the genomic distribution of short-range LOH events and that, in either environment, LOH events are unevenly distributed across the genome. Both the rates and the distribution of chromosome-level events across the genome differed from the rates and distribution of short-range LOH events. Most striking, chromosome-level events were observed only for in vivo populations, and in those populations, only for ChrR and Chr2. Our results are supported by those of Diogo et al. (2009) for a limited number of C. albicans strains isolated from the digestive tract of healthy individuals where chromosome-level events (trisomy, nondisjunction) were prevalent. We conclude that conditions during growth in a mammalian host affect chromosome nondisjunction more strongly than they affect mitotic crossover or other recombination processes. While the type of rearrangements differs from the mutational spectrum observed in bacterial pathogens during growth in stressful conditions (Victoir and Dujardin 2002; Tenaillon et al. 2004; Ponder et al. 2005), common mechanisms involving recombination and repair may yet be identified. The rates of chromosome-level recombination that we observed (~10−3 events/generation) are comparable to those reported for rates in other fungi at ~10−3 events/kb/generation (Awadalla 2003). Although high rates of chromosomal rearrangement have been observed at specific chromosomal loci of other pathogens (Henderson et al. 1999; Victoir and Dujardin 2002; Kline et al. 2003; Uhl et al. 2003; Zhang et al. 2003), few quantitative estimates of genomewide change are available to explain the variation apparent in clinical populations (Graeser et al. 1996; Fries and Casadevall 1998; Iwaguchi et al. 2000; Forche et al. 2005). The rates determined in our study are certainly sufficient to generate heritable variation in C. albicans populations during a single passage through the host. The variation in colony phenotypes generated during in vivo growth is of most direct consequence to C. albicans fitness in the host. We estimated the recovery of altered colony phenotypes at ~10−6/generation with a large fraction of these also regulated by temperature (Wr-T-R) and the greatest trait expression at 37°. This finding is consistent with genetic studies that found that many genes, when hemizygous, affect filamentous growth in vitro (Uhl et al. 2003) and suggests that the number of genes that affect the quality of filamentous growth is larger than the number of genes that affect the temperature regulation of filamentous growth. We found a positive association between altered colony phenotypes and short-range and chromosome-level LOH events and infer that choosing phenotypic variants for analysis increased the overall rate of the recovery of rearrangement events. Within in vitro-propagated strains, we did not observe altered colony growth phenotypes, which is consistent with the very low recovery of chromosomal rearrangement or altered colony growth phenotypes observed for in vitro growth (reviewed in Rustchenko 2007). Our observation of the appreciable phenotypic variation arising during a single passage through a mouse host is striking and is of sufficient magnitude to strongly affect the evolution of C. albicans populations within the short lifetime of the affected host. Recombination events as well as the altered colony phenotypes were positively associated with the recovery of 2DGR strains. We considered the possibility that selective growth on 2DG, like growth on 5-fluoroorotic acid (Boeke et al. 1987), might be mutagenic. However, no altered colony phenotypes were recovered among the many 2DGR strains derived from in vitro experiments, and controls show that cells were subject to 2DG selection for too little time to generate and recover colonies arising from GAL1 mutation. Further, rates at GAL1 (10−6/generation) in vitro are comparable to those reported for Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the URA3 locus at ~5 × 10−6 events/generation (calculated from Hiraoka et al. 2000). The GAL1 locus resides on Chr1, suggesting that the higher rate of LOH at GAL1 for in vivo populations results from a greater rate of recovering short-range LOH events there. We conclude that 2DG selection is not mutagenic; rather, it provides a portal through which genome rearrangement events and associated phenotypic variation can be efficiently recovered and studied. Together, our results show that relatively few mitotic generations occurring during a single passage through a mouse host generate measurable genomewide and phenotypic variation within populations. Our results shed light on the role of recombination in the evolution of asexual organisms (Dunham et al. 2002), especially opportunistic pathogens. The evolution of genetic factors that increase recombination rates will be favored under environmental uncertainty (Lenormand and Otto 2000; Otto 2002), and previous studies with S. cerevisiae demonstrate an advantage to recombining populations during infectious growth (Grimberg and Zeyl 2005). We propose that the commensal state of opportunistic pathogens such as C. albicans is maintained by the dynamic fluctuations of populations (Levin et al. 2000; Levin and Anita 2001). In this model, population bottlenecks decrease the efficiency of selection in removing deleterious phenotypes that arise during infectious growth. Even though population sizes may be quite large at later infection stages, populations will be dominated by those mutations arising early in passage through the host. In contrast, traits under selection during commensal growth will likely differ from those beneficial to invasive growth, and larger population sizes allow efficient selection. Either the retention of deleterious alleles by drift when population sizes are small, or clonal interference among genotypes carrying beneficial mutations (Kao and Sherlock 2008; Campos and Wahl 2009) when populations are large, will slow evolution of virulence and host adaptation. If so, further experiments should find that colony growth and virulence phenotypes generated during host passage are more variable than expected under strong directional selection for increased virulence and instead constitute “sink” populations that are unable to compete in the commensal environment or survive past host death (Romani et al. 2003; Sokurenko et al. 2006). As in drug resistance evolution (Anderson 2005), it will be important to evaluate fitness associated with differing growth conditions and varying rates of genome rearrangement. Results presented here portray the evolution of a genome strongly responsive to growth environment as well as suggest an important role of recurrent bottlenecks and population expansion during host passage and reinfection common to clinical settings. Acknowledgments We greatly appreciate Frank Odds for providing original data. The Minnesota Super Computing Institute provided computational resources and support. We thank Mark McClellan for production of whole-genome microarrays used for the competitive genome hybridization (CGH) portion of this study and Brett Couch, Ruth Shaw, Peter Tiffin, and Mike Travisano for helpful comments on evolutionary analyses and interpretation. Research was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant AI46351 to G.M. and P.T.M., NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant RO1-AI062427 to A.F. and J.B., and a Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute Integrative fellowship to A.S. Funding for CGH microarray production was provided in collaboration with Mira Edgerton (DE10641-S). Notes Supporting information is available online at http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/genetics.109.103325/DC1. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Value Health. 2002 Jan-Feb; 5(1):26-34.
[Value Health. 2002]J Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 1; 196(7):1068-75.
[J Infect Dis. 2007]Science. 1994 Jun 24; 264(5167):1872-3.
[Science. 1994]Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001; 55():673-707.
[Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2; 93(7):2873-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Evolution. 2004 Feb; 58(2):441-6.
[Evolution. 2004]Nat Rev Genet. 2000 Oct; 1(1):30-9.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2000]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Dec; 43(12):2930-8.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999]Yeast. 2000 Mar 30; 16(5):411-22.
[Yeast. 2000]Infect Genet Evol. 2002 Oct; 2(1):19-37.
[Infect Genet Evol. 2002]J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Aug; 40(8):2729-40.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2002]Mol Microbiol. 2004 Jun; 52(5):1451-62.
[Mol Microbiol. 2004]Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Jan; 4(1):156-65.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 2005 Mar; 55(5):1553-65.
[Mol Microbiol. 2005]Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jun; 39(1):38-50.
[Fungal Genet Biol. 2003]Mol Cell Biol. 1984 May; 4(5):994-6.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1984]Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jun; 39(1):38-50.
[Fungal Genet Biol. 2003]Infect Immun. 2001 Jan; 69(1):108-14.
[Infect Immun. 2001]Mutat Res. 2006 Mar 20; 595(1-2):91-106.
[Mutat Res. 2006]Infect Immun. 2001 Jan; 69(1):108-14.
[Infect Immun. 2001]Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jun; 39(1):38-50.
[Fungal Genet Biol. 2003]Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jun; 39(1):38-50.
[Fungal Genet Biol. 2003]Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Jan; 4(1):156-65.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2005]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(4):R52.
[Genome Biol. 2007]Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Jan; 4(1):156-65.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 2005 Mar; 55(5):1553-65.
[Mol Microbiol. 2005]PLoS Genet. 2008 Jan; 4(1):e1.
[PLoS Genet. 2008]Mol Microbiol. 2005 Mar; 55(5):1553-65.
[Mol Microbiol. 2005]Eukaryot Cell. 2004 Jun; 3(3):705-14.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2004]Mol Microbiol. 2005 Mar; 55(5):1553-65.
[Mol Microbiol. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 2005 Mar; 55(5):1553-65.
[Mol Microbiol. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17; 98(15):8255-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17; 98(15):8255-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]EMBO J. 2003 Jun 2; 22(11):2668-78.
[EMBO J. 2003]J Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 1; 196(7):1068-75.
[J Infect Dis. 2007]Microbiology. 2000 Aug; 146 ( Pt 8)():1881-9.
[Microbiology. 2000]Cell Microbiol. 2006 Jun; 8(6):961-71.
[Cell Microbiol. 2006]Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Jul; 4(7):1273-86.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2005]Trends Microbiol. 2003 Feb; 11(2):69-73.
[Trends Microbiol. 2003]Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jun; 39(1):38-50.
[Fungal Genet Biol. 2003]Fungal Genet Biol. 2009 Feb; 46(2):159-68.
[Fungal Genet Biol. 2009]Trends Microbiol. 2004 Jun; 12(6):264-70.
[Trends Microbiol. 2004]Mol Cell. 2005 Sep 16; 19(6):791-804.
[Mol Cell. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 1999 Sep; 33(5):919-32.
[Mol Microbiol. 1999]EMBO J. 2003 Jun 2; 22(11):2668-78.
[EMBO J. 2003]Genome Res. 2003 Sep; 13(9):2005-17.
[Genome Res. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29; 93(22):12473-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]J Infect Dis. 1998 Dec; 178(6):1761-6.
[J Infect Dis. 1998]EMBO J. 2003 Jun 2; 22(11):2668-78.
[EMBO J. 2003]FEMS Yeast Res. 2007 Jan; 7(1):2-11.
[FEMS Yeast Res. 2007]Methods Enzymol. 1987; 154():164-75.
[Methods Enzymol. 1987]Genetics. 2000 Dec; 156(4):1531-48.
[Genetics. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10; 99(25):16144-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Genetics. 2000 Sep; 156(1):423-38.
[Genetics. 2000]Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr; 3(4):252-61.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2002]Evolution. 2005 Feb; 59(2):431-8.
[Evolution. 2005]Genetics. 2000 Mar; 154(3):985-97.
[Genetics. 2000]