• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of wtpaEurope PMCEurope PMC Funders GroupSubmit a Manuscript
Am J Reprod Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 26, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
Am J Reprod Immunol. Nov 2008; 60(5): 462–473.
PMCID: PMC2702079
EMSID: UKMS27176

The effect of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha on ovarian function

Erin J. Williams, BSc, PhD,1,2,a Kelly Sibley, BSc,1 Aleisha N. Miller, BSc, MSc,1 Elizabeth A. Lane, MVB, PhD, DiplECAR,1 John Fishwick, MA VetMB DCHP MRCVS,1 Deborah M. Nash, BSc, PhD,1 Shan Herath, BSc, MSc, PhD,1 Gary CW England, DVetMed, PhD, DVR, DipVRep, DipECAR, DipACT, FRCVS,1 Hilary Dobson, BSc, PhD, DSc, Hon RCVS,3 and I. Martin Sheldon, BVSc, PhD, DCHP, DBR1

Abstract

Problem

Pelvic inflammatory disease and metritis are important causes of infertility in humans and domestic animals. Uterine infection with Escherichia coli in cattle is associated with reduced ovarian follicle growth and decreased estradiol secretion. We hypothesized that this effect could be mediated by the bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα).

Method of study

In vitro, bovine ovarian theca and granulosa cells were treated with LPS or TNFα and steroid secretion measured. In vivo, the effect of LPS or TNFα intrauterine infusion was determined by ovarian ultrasonography and measurement of hormones in cattle.

Results

LPS reduced granulosa cell estradiol secretion, whilst TNFα decreased theca and granulosa cell androstenedione and estradiol production, respectively. In vivo, fewer animals ovulated following intrauterine infusion with LPS or TNFα.

Conclusion

LPS and TNFα suppress ovarian cell function, supporting the concept that pelvic inflammatory disease and metritis are detrimental for bovine ovarian health.

Keywords: granulosa, theca, ovary, uterus, infection, LPS, TNFα

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and metritis are important causes of serious disease and infertility in humans and domestic animals. Each year in the United States, more than 1 million women experience an episode of acute PID, more than 100,000 become infertile as a result and more than 150 women die from PID or its complications1. Metritis affects 40% of dairy cattle after parturition, with each case costing an estimated $250 for reduced milk production, delayed conception and treatment2. Much of the infertility following a case of PID or metritis is associated with damage to the genital tract and reduced embryo survival3,4,5. However, there is increasing evidence that uterine disease also affects ovarian function.

Metritis is associated with slower growth of the dominant follicle in the ovary, fewer ovulations and lower peripheral plasma estradiol concentrations compared with clinically normal cattle6,7,8. The most numerous pathogenic bacteria in the bovine uterus is Escherichia coli and its presence is specifically associated with ovarian dysfunction8. The effects of E. coli are likely mediated directly through the endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or indirectly through the inflammatory mediators associated with E. coli infection including cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)9. Indeed, there are increased concentrations of LPS and TNFα in the peripheral plasma of animals with uterine infection6,8,10,11. More importantly, LPS concentrations are increased in the ovarian follicular fluid of animals with uterine disease12.

Studies exploring the effect of LPS on reproductive biology in the whole animal have focused on suppression of GnRH and LH from the hypothalamus and pituitary, respectively, rather than on ovarian follicle function13,14,15. However in sheep, there is evidence that LPS was associated with reduced estradiol secretion independently of LH pulse secretion16. There is in vitro evidence that theca and granulosa cell function may be perturbed by LPS in the rat17. Ovarian granulosa cells express the innate immune receptor complex for detection of LPS, and treatment with LPS modulates their endocrine function12. Alternatively, cytokines associated with uterine inflammation may affect ovarian function as they appear to suppress ovarian cell steroidogenesis, although serum-free culture methods were not always used in previous experiments18,19.

In the present study, cattle have been used to investigate the effect of uterine disease on ovarian function because the disease is biologically relevant and granulosa cells can be isolated free of immune cell contamination12. Furthermore, unlike humans, ovarian tissue is readily available from normal animals post-mortem and intervention studies can readily be preformed in vivo20,21. We use pure populations of ovarian cells in vitro and uterine infusion in vivo to test the hypothesis that LPS directly, or indirectly via TNFα, perturbs ovarian function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro study

Granulosa and theca cell culture

Granulosa cells were obtained and cultured separately in serum-free medium as previously described12,22. Briefly, bovine ovaries were collected at a local abattoir immediately post-mortem and returned to the laboratory within 1 h. Follicles were isolated manually by dissection and selected for isolation of cells if they had a translucent appearance, a well vascularised theca and clear follicular fluid with no visible debris or blood. Follicles were measured using a grid or calipers and classed by external diameter as small (< 4 mm diameter), medium (4-8 mm diameter) or large (> 8 mm diameter), reflecting their gonadotropin dependence and changes in the expression of steroidogenic enzymes and LH receptors23,24. At 4 mm diameter, follicles are recruited into follicle waves in cattle and become responsive to FSH, with increased expression of aromatase25. From 8 mm diameter, granulosa cells express LH receptors and these selected dominant follicles require pulsatile LH stimulation to continue growing25. Follicles were cut in half and granulosa cells obtained by flushing the hemisected shells and collecting the cell-rich supernatant22. Theca cells were then obtained by manually peeling the basal lamina from the hemisected follicular shells and digesting the tissue in M199 (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 1 mg/ml collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 μg/ml trypsin inhibitor, in a moving water bath for 45 minutes at 37°C and collecting the cell rich supernatant26.

As determined by Trypan Blue exclusion, granulosa and theca cells were > 80% viable and were seeded separately in 96 well plates (Nunc) at 1.5 × 106 cells/ml. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in serum-free medium, with granulosa cell medium supplemented with 10-7 M androstenedione22.

After an initial 48 h establishment period, cell culture media was removed and replaced with fresh media containing treatments. In the first experiment, cells were treated with media containing either 0, 0.1, 1 or 10 μg/ml LPS (Sigma: E.coli serotype 055.B5). These concentrations are similar to the concentrations of LPS in the follicular fluid of animals with clinical disease, and are also similar to concentrations of LPS used in previous studies to explore immune cell function12,27,28,29. In a further experiment, cells were treated with 0, 1, 10 or 100 ng/ml TNFα as these concentrations have been shown to affect steroidogenesis18. The media were changed after 48 h and then collected at 96 h to identify any longer term effects on ovarian cell steroidogenesis, reflecting the whole animal clinical context7,8. At the end of the incubation period, the number of viable cells was determined by neutral red dye uptake, as previously described30.

Hormone assays

Culture supernatants were analyzed by radioimmunoassay as previously described31, adapted for estradiol or androstenedione. Samples were diluted in 0.05 M Tris buffer containing 0.1% gelatin and 0.01% sodium azide. Standards, antiserum and tritiated tracer were purchased from Sigma (Sigma, UK), Biogenesis (Biogenesis, UK) and Amersham International PLC (Amersham, UK), respectively. The limit of detection for estradiol was 80 pg/ml. The respective intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 8.8% and 9.9% for estradiol and 3.1% and 12.6% for androstenedione.

In vivo study

Animals

Eight nulliparous post-pubertal Holstein heifers aged between 13 and 15 months at the start of the study were assigned to control or treatment groups in a randomized crossover design (n = 8 per treatment). Animals were housed in a straw-bedded yard in a naturally ventilated shed and fed a diet formulated according to standard guidelines32. The diet comprised of ad libitum grass hay and concentrates (Growergrain Nuts, BOCM Pauls Ltd, Ipswich) and the animals had ad libitum access to water. To limit any influence of infectious disease, the heifers were tested free of BVD, Leptospirosis, BHV-1, Tuberculosis, Brucella and EBL before experiments began. Maiden heifers were chosen for the study as they were predicted to have a sterile uterine environment, which was confirmed by regular uterine bacterial swabs, collected as previously described33. No bacteria were isolated from any of the animals at any point during the study. In addition, before the study began, the heifers were clinically assessed to ensure normal reproductive anatomy and ovarian function, and animals were acclimatized to the handling and housing facilities for 3 weeks. All procedures were carried out under Home Office authorization in compliance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, and experimental protocols were approved by the Royal Veterinary College Ethical Review Committee.

The experimental protocol was as previously described34. Briefly, estrus cycles were synchronized in the heifers by two intramuscular injections of a prostaglandin F analogue (cloprostenol, Estrumate, Scherring Plough Animal Health) 11 days apart (PG1 and PG2). For 3 days following the PG2 injection, animals were observed for 30 min every 2 h to detect estrus, as determined by the first time an animal stood to be mounted. On the morning of the seventh day after first observed standing oestrus, each heifer was given a third injection of prostaglandin F analogue (PG3) to induce luteal regression and permit ovulation of the expected dominant follicle.

Treatments

In the first experiment investigating the effects of LPS, animals were randomly administered a control infusion of 10 ml sterile PBS or 10 ml sterile PBS containing 3.0 μg/kg E. coli serotype 055:B5 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich). In the second experiment investigating the effects of TNFα, animals were randomly administered a control infusion of 10 ml sterile PBS, or 10 ml sterile PBS containing 0.1 μg rhTNFα (Sigma-Aldrich). Treatments were administered in a crossover design such that each animal received both control and LPS treatments in the first experiment, followed by control and TNFα treatments in the second experiment, with a recovery period of one spontaneous estrous cycle between treatment periods to minimize carry-over effects from the previous treatment.

Infusions began 24 h after first observed standing estrus following PG2 and were administered every 6 h for 9 days. Infusions were carried out by passing a sterile, disposable bovine uterine catheter (Arnolds, UK) through the cervix and into the uterine lumen guided by transrectal palpation. The treatment was drawn into a sterile 10 ml syringe (BD) which was then attached to the end of the catheter and the contents infused into the uterus.

Clinical examination

Reproductive function was monitored as previously described7,8. Briefly, the genital tract of each cow was examined by transrectal palpation and ultrasonography using a 7.5 MHz linear array transducer (Honda HS-2000; Honda Electronics, Aichi, Japan). Ovarian follicles ≥ 4 mm in diameter and corpora lutea in each ovary were identified, and the maximum diameter of each structure was estimated by averaging measurements made using the instrument’s internal calipers in two dimensions at 90 degrees7,35. A follicle was defined as a non-echogenic structure with a clear demarcation between the follicular wall and the antrum; and, the day of dominance was defined as the day the largest follicle on the ovary achieved an internal diameter of ≥ 8.5 mm which corresponds to the onset of deviation36. The day of ovulation was classed as the last day a dominant follicle was scanned before it disappeared and a CL subsequently formed in its place35. A CL was characterized by a grainy echogenic structure with a well-defined border within the ovarian stroma, often with a non-echogenic lacuna.

General health was monitored every 6 h throughout the study period, including measurement of rectal temperature using a standard digital thermometer (National Veterinary Supplies, Stoke-on-Trent, UK). Body weight was estimated using a proprietary weigh-band (Ascott Ltd, Powys, UK) placed around the chest and shoulder area. Body condition was scored by visual assessment and palpation of areas of each animals body and assigning a score based on the fat distribution37.

Blood sample collection and analysis

Blood samples were collected at regular intervals from the jugular vein. Blood samples were collected following PG2 every 3 h for 6 days, every 12 h for five days and finally every 3 h until the end of the study. In the LPS experiment only, blood samples were collected via jugular catheter every 12 minutes during an 8 h time period. This allowed measurement of pulsatile LH release from the pituitary as there is evidence that LPS can suppress LH pulsatility13.

Plasma concentrations of estradiol were analyzed using the Estradiol MAIA radioimmunoassay kit (Biogenesis, Poole, UK) by the method previously described by Prendiville et al38, with some modifications as described by Williams et al8. The intra- and inter- assay coefficients of variation were 20.8 and 21.6 %, respectively. Plasma concentrations of progesterone were measured in duplicate using a commercial ELISA kit (Ridgeway Science, Gloucester, UK) following the manufacturers guidelines. The intra- and inter- assay coefficients of variation were 2.7 and 12.2%, respectively.

The concentrations of LH and FSH were measured in duplicate in peripheral plasma as described previously39. Standards were purchased from the National Hormone and Pituitary Programme (NHPP, California, USA) and iodinated tracers were purchased from Amersham International PLC (Amersham, UK). For FSH the internal recovery was 95%, the intra-assay coefficient of variation was 14.0% and the inter-assay coefficient of variation was 10.5%. For LH, internal recovery was 95%, the intra-assay coefficient of variation was 14.0% and the inter-assay coefficient of variation was 10.4%. LH concentrations were analyzed using the computer algorithm PULSAR determine the mean, maximum and minimum LH concentrations, number of pulses, mean pulse amplitude, mean pulse length, mean frequency and mean inter-pulse interval40. The onset of LH peak was defined as the time at which LH concentration exceeded 5 ng/ml.

Concentrations of the acute phase protein α1-acid glycoprotein were measured using a previously described method adapted for 96-well plates (Life Technologies, Invitrogen, UK)41,42. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 12 and 18%, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using the statistics program SAS 9.143. Results are reported as the arithmetic mean ± SEM, and significance ascribed when P <0.05. The effects of treatments in vitro were explored using Mixed Model ANOVA as described previously7. In vivo data were normalized to first day of uterine infusion, which was defined as day 0. Data from control and treated animals were compared by ANOVA and post hoc tests performed with Dunnet’s adjustment, except for proportions, which were compared using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Effect of LPS on ovarian cell function in vitro

Treatment with LPS did not affect cell numbers or androstenedione production by theca cells isolated from small, medium or large ovarian follicles (Fig 1a). However, LPS treatment decreased estradiol production by granulosa cells isolated from small (P < 0.001: mixed model analysis), medium (P < 0.001) or large (P < 0.001) ovarian follicles (Fig 1b).

Figure 1
Mean ± SEM (a) androstenedione production by theca cells, and (b) oestradiol production by granulosa cells, isolated from (i) small (<4 mm diameter), (ii) medium (4–8 mm diameter) or (iii) large (>8 mm diameter) bovine ...

Effect of TNFα on ovarian cell function in vitro

Treatment with TNFα reduced androstenedione production by theca cells isolated from all follicle sizes despite increasing the number of cells in some cases (P< 0.001; Fig 2a). In addition, TNFα suppressed estradiol production by granulosa cells isolated from small (P < 0.01), medium (P < 0.001) and large (P < 0.01) ovarian follicles supplied with 10-7M androstenedione. Granulosa cell numbers were not affected by TNFα (Fig 2b).

Figure 2
Mean ± SEM (a) androstenedione production by theca cells, and (b) oestradiol production by granulosa cells, isolated from (i) small (<4 mm diameter), (ii) medium (4–8 mm diameter) or (iii) large (>8 mm diameter) bovine ...

In vivo studies

In the LPS and TNFα studies, rectal temperatures were consistently within the normal range of 38.0 to 38.5°C during each study period, and peripheral concentrations of the acute phase protein AGP were not different between treatments. In the LPS study, AGP concentrations ranged from 0.07 – 2.25 mg/ml and 0.04 – 2.28 mg/ml, for control and treated animals, respectively. In the TNFα study, AGP concentrations ranged from 0.30 – 4.35 mg/ml and 0.33 – 4.34 mg/ml, for control and treated animals, respectively. One animal was removed prior to the TNFα study because of an unrelated clinical disease.

All animals had an active corpus luteum at the time of induction of luteolysis (PG2), as determined by ultrasonography and peripheral plasma progesterone concentrations > 1 ng/ml, displayed standing estrus and the dominant follicle ovulated. An LH surge was observed at the time of first standing oestrus ± 6 h and there was no significant difference between treatment groups. Similarly, FSH concentrations did not differ between treatment groups (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
Mean ± SEM plasma FSH concentrations for control (■) and treated (□) animals infused with (i) LPS (n = 8 per treatment) or (ii) TNFα (n = 7 per treatment).

Effect of LPS on ovarian function in vivo

Following estrus a new wave of ovarian follicles emerged in all animals and dominant follicle diameter increased over time (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in dominant follicle diameter or oestradiol concentrations between treated and control animals (Fig 4). Plasma progesterone concentrations increased over time (P < 0.001) concomitant with formation of the CL after estrus in all animals (Fig 5ai). Progesterone concentrations were lower in animals treated with LPS between days 3 and 9 (P < 0.05: mixed model analysis). A prostaglandin F analogue injection was administered on day 6 to permit ovulation of the new dominant follicle (PG3), but fewer LPS treated animals did ovulate (3/8 vs. 7/8, P < 0.05).

Figure 4
Mean ± SEM (a) dominant follicle diameter, and (b) plasma oestradiol concentrations, for control (■) and treated (□) animals infused with (i) LPS (n = 8 per treatment) or (ii) TNFα (n = 7 per treatment).
Figure 5
Mean ± SEM (a) corpus luteum diameter, and (b) plasma progesterone concentrations, for control (■) and treated (□) animals infused with (i) LPS (n = 8 per treatment) or (ii) TNFα (n = 7 per treatment).

Following PG3, pulsatile LH secretion was observed in all animals and no difference in mean, maximum or minimum LH concentrations was observed between LPS or control treatments. The number of peaks observed was the same for each treatment and there was no difference in peak amplitude, peak frequency, peak length or inter-peak interval between treatments (Table 1). Representative patterns of pulsatile LH secretion during the control or LPS infusion are shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Representative peripheral plasma LH concentration profiles for an animal infused with (a) control or (b) LPS.
Table 1
Pulsatile LH data for heifers infused in utero with LPS or control. Values are Mean ± SEM.

Effect of TNFα on ovarian function in vivo

Following estrus a new wave of ovarian follicles emerged in all animals and as expected dominant follicle diameter increased over time (P < 0.001). Dominant follicle diameter and plasma estradiol concentrations did not differ significantly between treatments (Fig. 4). Plasma progesterone concentrations increased over time (P < 0.001) concomitant with formation of the CL after estrus in all animals, but did not differ significantly between treatments (Fig. 5). A prostaglandin F analogue injection was administered on day 6 to permit ovulation of the new dominant follicle (PG3), but fewer animals ovulated when treated with TNFα as compared with control (4/7 vs. 6/7, P = 0.09).

Following PG3, an LH surge was observed in all animals at the time of estrus ± 9.1 h (corresponding to 41.4 ± 1.7 h after PG3); LH concentration was 14.1 ± 1.7 ng/ml with no significant difference between control and TNFα treatment.

DISCUSSION

Animals with metritis, particularly those associated with E. coli infection, have reduced ovarian follicle growth and function and are less likely to ovulate7,8,44. These effects could be mediated directly by E. coli LPS or indirectly by cytokines such as TNFα in response to uterine infection. In the present study, ovarian cell steroidogenesis was inhibited by treatment with LPS or TNFα in vitro. Granulosa cell estradiol secretion was reduced by LPS treatment, whilst TNFα reduced theca and granulosa cell androstenedione and estradiol production, respectively. The effects of LPS or TNFα on ovarian function were more subtle in vivo when infused into animals during a defined period of ovarian follicle and corpus luteum development. However, the dominant follicle formed during LPS or TNFα treatment was less likely to ovulate than in control animals. Taken together these studies support the hypothesis that LPS or TNFα can directly impair ovarian function. Thus, it is important for clinicians treating patients with pelvic inflammatory disease or metritis, to be aware that uterine infection can affect ovarian as well as uterine health.

Microbial infection of the uterus is a common and costly cause of disease and infertility in humans and domestic animals. Dairy cows appear to have a particular propensity for uterine disease after parturition, with up to 40% of animals affected2. Uterine disease and other systemic diseases are associated with perturbation of ovarian follicle function in cattle7,45,46. In metritis, the most important pathogen is E. coli8,10. Many of the effects of E. coli in disease processes are mediated via the endotoxin, LPS, or by cytokines such as TNFα associated with the inflammation that occurs during infection9. These products are found in the peripheral plasma and ovarian follicular fluid during uterine infection6,8,10,12.

Ovarian follicle growth and function are characterized by secretion of estradiol which is produced in the ovary by granulosa cell aromatisation of theca-derived androstenedione24. Estradiol regulates two positive feedback loops to maintain the dominant follicle and induce ovulation. At ovarian level, oestradiol enhances gonadotropic induction of LH receptors and more FSH receptors in granulosa cells and in synergy with FSH, increases its own production by stimulating aromatase activity and the expression of its own receptors in granulosa and theca cells47,48,49,50. At pituitary level, estradiol secreted by the dominant follicle feeds back in the absence of progesterone to enhance gonadotropin secretion, thus ensuring the preovulatory LH surge which induces ovulation51.

The cell surface receptor that mediates most of the effects of LPS is Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in association with CD14 and MD-29,27, and this receptor complex is present in the ovary of mice and cattle12,52. In the present study, estradiol production by granulosa cells in an immune cell-free culture was inhibited in response to LPS, despite FSH and androstenedione concentrations remaining constant. Furthermore, in the theca cell cultures where LH remained constant, androstenedione production did not change in response to LPS. Together these results indicate that rather than affecting pituitary FSH production or secretion, LPS reduces the ability of granulosa cells to respond to FSH or to aromatise androstenedione to oestradiol. Similarly, in the rat, LPS decreases the LH-induced aromatisation of androgens to oestrogen resulting in an inhibition of oestradiol production53. A dose dependant decrease in LH receptor formation was observed in rat granulosa cells treated with LPS. It could, therefore, be postulated that LPS reduces LH receptors on granulosa cells thus inhibiting the response to LH and thereby blocking ovulation. This may explain why, in the present study, animals treated with LPS failed to ovulate in the presence of normal LH concentrations.

It is well established that granulosa cells have receptors for TNFα54,55,56. Estradiol secretion is suppressed following treatment of granulosa cells with TNFα in the rat and human53,54; and the expression of 17βHSD and P450arom mRNA is decreased57. In the cow, FSH-induced estradiol production in granulosa cells from small follicles, and LH-induced androstenedione production by theca cells from large follicles, are both inhibited following treatment with TNFα19. In the present study, TNFα treatment also inhibited FSH-induced estradiol production by bovine granulosa cells from small, medium and large follicles. Furthermore, LH-induced androstenedione production by cells from small, medium and large follicles, was also inhibited. This inhibition of ovarian cell steroidogenesis was observed 96 h after treatment, thus, the results of the present study suggest that it may be prolonged exposure to TNFα, which results in decreased steroidogenic function of these cells.

Infusion of LPS into the uterine lumen blunted the pre-ovulatory LH surge in heifers leading to failure of ovulation and the formation of cystic follicles44. Administration of LPS intravenously results in the disruption of neuroendocrine activity and interference with the oestrous cycle of sheep. Hypothalamic GnRH secretion is suppressed, pulsatile LH secretion from the pituitary is inhibited, and there is a reduction in pituitary responsiveness to GnRH16. However, these effects are seen at concentrations of LPS which induce systemic illness in the animals treated. In contrast to these previous studies, a feature of the present study was the administration of treatment at concentrations which do not cause systemic sickness in the animals. Indeed, the animals were clinically normal; rectal temperature and acute phase protein concentrations were in the normal range. Furthermore, there was no evidence that LPS or TNFα affected the secretion of LH allowing the direct effect on the ovary to be evaluated. Thus, our results provide evidence of a direct utero-ovarian pathway via which LPS or TNFα directly modulate ovarian function. The in vivo responses were subtle perhaps because of the limited systemic effect. However, treatment was associated with fewer ovulations even in the face of normal LH pulse profiles, as observed in sheep16.

Smaller ovulatory follicles result in less effective luteal structures58, however, in the present study, the CL that was affected by LPS or TNFα developed from a follicle which ovulated prior to treatment. This suggests that LPS or TNFα may affect luteal cells directly. Indeed, TNFα has recently been shown to play bifunctional roles in the regulation of CL function during the estrus cycle59. In heifers infused with TNFα, peak progesterone concentrations tended to be lower, although differences were not significant. Receptors for TNFα are present in the bovine CL and low concentrations of TNFα similar to those used in the present study, cause luteolysis59,60. Additionally, TNFα stimulates the release of PGF2α from CL cells, and also endometrial cells, which may also result in luteolysis59. Therefore, intrauterine infusion of TNFα may affect progesterone production directly via actions on luteal cells or indirectly via the induction of prostaglandin synthesis in the bovine endometrium and CL.

In conclusion, ovarian cell steroidogenesis was decreased by treatment with LPS or TNFα in vitro. Granulosa cell estradiol secretion was reduced by LPS treatment, whilst TNFα reduced theca and granulosa cells androstenedione and estradiol production, respectively. Although, the effects of LPS or TNFα on ovarian structures and steroidogenesis were more subtle in vivo, ovulation of the dominant follicle was less likely than in control animals. The response was localised as peripheral immune markers were not increased and pituitary gonadotropin concentrations did not differ between treatment groups. Taken together the present study supports the hypothesis that LPS or TNFα can directly impact ovarian function. Thus, it is important to be aware that pelvic inflammatory disease or metritis can affect ovarian as well as uterine health.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was funded by the Wellcome Trust. The authors thank Deborah Fischer, Hilary Purcell and Jean Routley for technical assistance and Dr Claire Glister for advice on theca cell culture. We also thank staff and students at the RVC who helped with collection of clinical samples and staff at Boltons Park Farm for animal husbandry duties.

REFERENCES

2. Sheldon IM. The postpartum uterus. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 2004;20:569–591. [PubMed]
3. Ross JD. An updated on pelvic inflammatory disease. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2002;78:18–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Sheldon IM, Lewis GS, LeBlanc S, Gilbert RO. Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology. 2006;65:1516–1530. [PubMed]
5. Soto P, Natzke RP, Hansen PJ. Identification of possible mediators of embryonic mortality caused by mastitis: actions of lipopolysaccharide, prostaglandin F2alpha, and the nitric oxide generator, sodium nitroprusside dihydrate, on oocyte maturation and embryonic development in cattle. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2003;50:263–272. [PubMed]
6. Mateus L, da Costa L Lopes, Diniz P, Ziecik AJ. Relationship between endotoxin and prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGFM) concentrations and ovarian function in dairy cows with puerperal endometritis. Animal Reproduction Science. 2003;76:143–154. [PubMed]
7. Sheldon IM, Noakes DE, Rycroft AN, Pfeiffer DU, Dobson H. Influence of uterine bacterial contamination after parturition on ovarian dominant follicle selection and follicle growth and function in cattle. Reproduction. 2002;123:837–845. [PubMed]
8. Williams EJ, Fischer DP, Noakes DE, England GE, Rycroft A, Dobson H, Sheldon IM. The relationship between uterine pathogen growth density and ovarian function in the postpartum dairy cow. Theriogenology. 2007;68:549–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Beutler B, Hoebe K, Du X, Ulevitch RJ. How we detect microbes and respond to them: the Toll-like receptors and their transducers. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2003;74:479–485. [PubMed]
10. Dohmen MJ, Joop K, Sturk A, Bols PE, Lohuis JA. Relationship between intrauterine bacterial contamination, endotoxin levels and the development of endometritis in postpartum cows with dystocia or retained placenta. Theriogenology. 2000;54:1019–1032. [PubMed]
11. Kim IH, Na KJ, Yang MP. Immune responses during the peripartum period in dairy cows with postpartum endometritis. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2005;51:757–764. [PubMed]
12. Herath S, Williams EJ, Lilly ST, Dobson H, Bryant CE, Sheldon IM. Ovarian follicular cells have innate immune capabilities that modulate their endocrine function. Reproduction. 2007;134:683–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Battaglia DF, Bowen JM, Krasa HB, Thrun LA, Viguié C, Karsch FJ. Endotoxin inhibits the reproductive neuroendocrine axis while stimulating adrenal steroids: a simultaneous view from hypophyseal portal and peripheral blood. Endocrinology. 1997;138:4273–4281. [PubMed]
14. Karsch FJ, Battaglia DF, Breen KM, Debus N, Harris TG. Mechanisms for ovarian cycle disruption by immune/inflammatory stress. Stress. 2002;5:101–112. [PubMed]
15. Peter AT, Simon JE, Luker CW, Bosu WT. Site of action for endotoxin-induced cortisol release in the suppression of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surges. Theriogenology. 1990;33:637–643. [PubMed]
16. Battaglia DF, Krasa HB, Padmanabhan V, Viguié C, Karsch FJ. Endocrine alterations that underlie endotoxin-induced disruption of the follicular phase in ewes. Biology of Reproduction. 2000;62:45–53. [PubMed]
17. Terranova PF, Rice VM. Review: Cytokine involvement in ovarian processes. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 1997;37:50–63. [PubMed]
18. Basini G, Mainardi GL, Bussolati G, Tamanini C. Steroidogenesis, proliferation and apoptosis in bovine granulosa cells: role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and its possible signaling mechanisms. Reproduction Fertility Development. 2002;14:141–150. [PubMed]
19. Spicer LJ. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibits steroidogenesis of bovine ovarian granulosa and theca cells in vitro, involvement of TNF-α receptors. Endocrine. 1998;8:109–115. [PubMed]
20. Campbell BK, Souza C, Gong J, Webb R, Kendall N, Marsters P, Robinson G, Mitchell A, Telfer EE, Baird DT. Domestic ruminants as models for the elucidation of the mechanisms controlling ovarian follicle development in humans. Reproduction Supplement. 2003;61:429–443. [PubMed]
21. Herath S, Dobson H, Bryant CE, Sheldon IM. Use of the cow as a large animal model of uterine infection and immunity. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2006;69:13–22. [PubMed]
22. Gutierrez CG, Campbell BK, Webb R. Development of a long-term bovine granulosa cell culture system: induction and maintenance of estradiol production, response to follicle-stimulating hormone, and morphological characteristics. Biology of Reproduction. 1997;56:608–616. [PubMed]
23. Webb R, Nicholas B, Gong JG, Campbell BK, Gutierrez CG, Garverick HA, Armstrong DG. Mechanisms regulating follicular development and selection of the dominant follicle. Reproduction Supplement. 2003;61:71–90. [PubMed]
24. Fortune JE. Ovarian follicular growth and development in mammals. Biology of Reproduction. 1994;50:225–232. [PubMed]
25. Xu Z, Garverick HA, Smith GW, Smith MF, Hamilton SA, Youngquist RS. Expression of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage, cytochrome p450 17 alpha-hydroxylase, and cytochrome P450 aromatase in bovine follicles during the first follicular wave. Endocrinology. 1995;136:981–989. [PubMed]
26. Glister C, Richards SL, Knight PG. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) -4, -6, and -7 potently suppress basal and luteinizing hormone-induced androgen production by bovine theca interna cells in primary culture: could ovarian hyperandrogenic dysfunction be caused by a defect in thecal BMP signalling? Endocrinology. 2005;146:1883–1892. [PubMed]
27. Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Van Huffel C, Du X, Birdwell D, Alejos E, Silva M, Galanos C, Freudenberg M, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Layton B, Beutler B. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in TLR4 gene. Science. 1998;282:2085–2088. [PubMed]
28. Shell SA, Hesse C, Morris SM, Jr, Milcarek C. Elevated levels of the 64-kDa cleavage stimulatory factor (CstF-64) in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages influence gene expression and induce alternative poly(A) site selection. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280:39950–39961. [PubMed]
29. Tsatsanis C, Androulidaki A, Alissafi T, Charalampopoulos I, Dermitzaki E, Roger T, Gravanis A, Margioris AN. Corticotropin-releasing factor and the urocortins induce the expression of TLR4 in macrophages via activation of the transcription factors PU.1 and AP-1. Journal of Immunology. 2006;176:1869–1877. [PubMed]
30. Campbell BK, Scaramuzzi RJ, Webb R. Induction and maintenance of oestradiol and immunoreactive inhibin production with FSH by ovine granulosa cells cultured in serum-free media. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1996;106:7–16. [PubMed]
31. Abayasekara DR, Michael AE, Webley GE, Flint AP. Mode of action of prostaglandin F2 alpha in human luteinized granulosa cells: role of protein kinase C. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 1993;97:81–91. [PubMed]
32. AFRC . Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International; 1993.
33. Noakes DE, Till D, Smith GR. Bovine uterine flora post partum: a comparison of swabbing and biopsy. Veterinary Record. 1989;124:563–564. [PubMed]
34. Miller AN, Williams EJ, Sibley K, Herath S, Lane EA, Fishwick J, Nash DM, Rycroft AN, Dobson H, Bryant CE, Sheldon IM. The effects of Arcanobacterium pyogenes on endometrial function in vitro, and on uterine and ovarian function in vivo. Theriogenology. 2007;68:972–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Dobson H, Ribadu AY, Noble KM, Tebble JE, Ward WR. Ultrasonography and hormone profiles of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-induced persistent ovarian follicles (cysts) in cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 2000;120:405–410. [PubMed]
36. Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Donadeu FX, Bergfelt DR. Mechanism of follicle deviation in monovular farm species. Animal Reproduction Science. 2003;78:239–57. [PubMed]
37. Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. Body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 1989;72:68–78.
38. Prendiville DJ, Enright WJ, Crowe MA, Finnerty M, Hynes N, Roche JF. Immunization of heifers against gonadotropin-releasing hormone: antibody titers, ovarian function, body growth, and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science. 1995;73:2382–2389. [PubMed]
39. Dobson H, Ribadu AY, Noble KM, Tebble JE, Ward WR. Ultrasonography and hormone profiles of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-induced persistent ovarian follicles (cysts) in cattle. J Reprod Fertil. 2000;120:405–410. [PubMed]
40. Merriam GR, Wachter KW. Algorithms for the study of episodic hormone secretion. American Journal of Physiology. 1982;243:310–318. [PubMed]
41. Lewis GS. Uterine Health and Disorders. Journal of Dairy Science. 1997;80:984–994. [PubMed]
42. Sheldon IM, Noakes DE, Rycroft AN, Dobson H. Acute phase protein responses to uterine bacterial contamination in cattle after calving. The Veterinary Record. 2001:172–175. [PubMed]
43. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and enhancements through release. Vol. 6. SAS Institute Inc; Cary, NC: 1997. pp. 571–702.
44. Peter AT, Bosu WT, DeDecker RJ. Suppression of preovulatory luteinising hormone surges in heifers after intrauterine infusions of Escherichia coli endotoxin. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1989;50:368–373. [PubMed]
45. Fray MD, Mann GE, Bleach EC, Knight PG, Clarke MC, Charleston B. Modulation of sex hormone secretion in cows by acute infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus. Reproduction. 2002;123:281–289. [PubMed]
46. Huszenicza G, Jánosi S, Gáspárdy A, Kulcsár M. Endocrine aspects in pathogenesis of mastitis in postpartum dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science. 2004;82:83–389. [PubMed]
47. Bao B, Garverick HA, Smith GW, Smith MF, Salfen BE, Youngquist RS. Changes in messenger ribonucleic acid encoding luteinising hormone receptor, cytochrome P450-side chain cleavage, and aromatase are associated with recruitment and selection of bovine ovarian follicles. Biology of Reproduction. 1997;56:1158–1168. [PubMed]
48. Dierich A, Sairam MR, Monaco L, Fimia GM, Gansmuller A, LeMeur M, Sassone-Corsi P. Impairing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) signalling in vivo: targeted disruption of the FSH receptor leads to aberrant gametogenesis and hormonal imbalance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 1998;95:13612–13617. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Pelletier G, Labrie C, Labrie F. Localization of oestrogen receptor alpha, oestrogen receptor beta and androgen receptors in the rat reproductive organs. Journal of Endocrinology. 2000;165:359–70. [PubMed]
50. Sar M, Welsch F. Differential expression of oestrogen receptor-beta and oestrogen receptor-alpha in the rat ovary. Endocrinology. 1999;140:963–971. [PubMed]
51. Richards JS, Kersey KA. Changes in theca and granulosa cell function in antral follicles developing during pregnancy in the rat: gonadotropin receptors, cyclic AMP and estradiol-17 beta. Biology of Reproduction. 1979;21:1185–1201. [PubMed]
52. Shimada M, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robanya I, Richards JS. Induced expression of pattern recognition receptors in cumulus oocyte complexes: novel evidence for innate immune-like functions during ovulation. Molecular Endocrinology. 2006;20:3228–39. [PubMed]
53. Taylor CC, Terranova PF. Lipopolysaccharide inhibits in vitro luteinising hormone-stimulated rat ovarian granulosa cell estradiol but not progesterone secretion. Biology of Reproduction. 1996;54:1390–1396. [PubMed]
54. Sakumoto R, Shibaya M, Okuda K. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) inhibits progesterone and estradiol-17beta production from cultured granulosa cells: presence of TNFalpha receptors in bovine granulosa and theca cells. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2003;49:441–449. [PubMed]
55. Son DS, Arai KY, Roby KF, Terranova PF. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) increases granulosa cell proliferation: dependence on c-Jun and TNF receptor type 1. Endocrinology. 2004;145:1218–1226. [PubMed]
56. Spicer LJ. Receptors for insulin-like growth factor-I and tumor necrosis factor-alpha are hormonally regulated in bovine granulosa and theca cells. Animal Reproduction Science. 2001;67:45–58. [PubMed]
57. Ghersevich S, Isomaa V, Vihko P. Cytokine regulation of the expression of estrogenic biosynthetic enzymes in cultured rat granulosa cells. Molecular Cellular Endocrinology. 2001;172:21–30. [PubMed]
58. Robinson RS, Hammond AJ, Hunter MG, Mann GE. The induction of a delayed post-ovulatory progesterone rise in dairy cows: a novel model. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 2005;28:285–295. [PubMed]
59. Skarzynski DJ, Jaroszewski JJ, Okuda K. Role of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and nitric oxide in luteolysis in cattle. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 2005;29:340–346. [PubMed]
60. Miyamoto Y, Sakumoto R, Sakabe Y, Miyake M, Okano A, Okuda K. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha receptors are present in the corpus luteum throughout the oestrous cycle and during the early gestation period in pigs. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2002;37:105–10. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...