![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved Matrix metalloproteinases -8, -9 and -12 in smokers and patients with Stage 0 COPD 1Department of Medicine and Divisions of Pulmonary Medicine and 2Allergology, 3Departments of Clinical Physiology and 4Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland 5Department of Respiratory Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium Correspondence: Vuokko L Kinnula, University of Helsinki, Department of Medicine, PO Box 22, 00014 Helsinki, Finland, Tel 358 9 4717 2255, Fax 358 9 4717 6107, Email vuokko.kinnula/at/helsinki.fi This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract COPD is underdiagnosed and its early assessment is problematic. It has been suggested that symptomatic smokers with normal FEV1/FVC (Stage 0 COPD, GOLD criteria) can develop COPD in the future. Potential early biomarkers in COPD include the matrix metallo-proteinases (MMPs). It is not yet known, whether alterations in MMP expression are associated with smoking alone or with the risk of developing COPD. In this cross-sectional study MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 were determined from induced sputum and plasma by ELISA, immunocytochemistry, zymography, and/or Western blot in non-smokers (n = 32), smokers with symptoms (Stage 0, GOLD criteria) (n = 23) or without symptoms (n = 23). Only MMP-8 differentiated Stage 0 COPD from non-symptomatic smokers (p = 0.02). MMP-9 levels were significantly elevated in the induced sputum of non-symptomatic smokers and Stage 0 COPD (p = 0.01, p < 0.001) compared to non-smokers, but did not differ between the two subgroups of smokers. MMP-12 was higher only at Stage 0 compared to non-smokers (p = 0.04). MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 immunoreactivity was localized in macrophages and neutrophils, especially in smokers. MMP-8 levels correlated significantly with the small airway flow parameters (MEF50, MEF25) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0004) and markers of neutrophil activation (myeloperoxidase, lactoferrin). In conclusion MMP-8 may differentiate Stage 0 from healthy smokers. Keywords: cigarette smoking, GOLD, COPD, MMP, myeloperoxidase, oxidant, Stage 0 Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is leading cause of death worldwide, it also causes significant morbidity and disability (Calverley and Walker 2003). COPD is underdiagnosed and its early assessment is problematic. Even the early stages of the disease with normal lung function parameters (FEV/FVC >0.7) possess inflammatory changes and structural abnormalities in the airways and lung parenchyma (Hogg et al 2004). The current international COPD classification, GOLD criteria (Pauwels et al 2001), takes these problems into consideration since there may be an apparent risk for COPD development in symptomatic smokers who have normal lung function parameters. The GOLD classification categorizes symptomatic subjects to have GOLD Stage 0 COPD. The usefulness of Stage 0 in predicting COPD development is still unclear (Vestbo and Lange 2002). However, recent studies do indicate that Stage 0 has importance, at least in predicting long-term mortality (Ekberg-Aronsson et al 2005; Mannino 2006; Stavem et al 2006). At present no biomarker has been found to differentiate these at-risk individuals from healthy cigarette smokers. Potential markers not only need to be evaluated in terms of disease development but they may also be implemented in smoking cessation protocols. Biomarkers of tissue damage/remodeling in COPD include matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (Saetta et al 2001; Shapiro 2002; Barnes 2004). MMPs are activated by many different factors including cigarette smoke and oxidative stress (Rajagopalan et al 1996; Shapiro 2002; Nelson and Melendez 2004; Kinnula 2005; Kinnula et al 2005; Rahman and Adcock 2006). Markers of oxidative stress have been detected not only in COPD but also in cigarette smokers and subjects with Stage 0 COPD (Rytila et al 2006). Several MMPs including MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 are elevated both in experimental emphysema and human COPD, especially MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 have been associated with COPD (Hautamaki et al 1997; Beeh et al 2003; Vernooy et al 2004; Culpitt et al 2005; Demedts et al 2006; Elkington and Friedland 2006). The levels of these MMPs and TIMP-1 (the major endogenous inhibitor of MMP-8 and MMP-9) have not been earlier compared in non-smokers, non-symptomatic and symptomatic smokers (Stage 0 COPD). Knowing the effects of cigarette smoking on many signaling cascades, accumulation and activation of the inflammatory cells, and increased oxidative stress, it is likely that there is some increase/activation of MMPs in chronic smokers without airway flow limitation. Induced sputum is a validated non-invasive method for the assessment of airway/tissue inflammation/injury in COPD (Djukanovic et al 2002). MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12 and TIMP-1 (a major endogenous inhibitor of MMP-8 and MMP-9) were investigated in induced sputum and plasma samples of healthy non-symptomatic smokers with normal lung function parameters by GOLD criteria and patients with GOLD Stage 0. MMP levels were also correlated with the levels of induced sputum neutrophils and macrophages, lactoferrin, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nitrotyrosine to further characterize the association between these MMPs and the oxidative stress and inflammatory profile of the lung. Materials and methods Subjects This cross-sectional study population included three groups: non-smoking healthy controls (NS) (n = 32), non-symptomatic smokers (S) (n = 23, mean 24 pack-years) and symptomatic smokers (chronic symptoms such as cough and phlegm, but no airway obstruction), ie, GOLD stage 0 (n = 23, mean 37 pack-years) (Table 1).
Of the non-smoking subjects, 20 were never-smokers and 12 ex-smokers (mean 15.7 pack-years) who had stopped smoking at least 20 years earlier. For comparison, MMPs and TIMP-1 were also analyzed from stable COPD patients (Stage I–III) (n = 10, mean 47 pack-years), (FEV1 62% of predicted, DLCO/VA 66% of predicted). The staging was based on clinical symptoms assessed with the St George’ s Respiratory Questionnaire, and airflow parameters on spirometry, according to the GOLD classification (American Thoracic Society (ATS) 1995; Pauwels et al 2001). Three GOLD stage 0 patients had been prescribed β2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The medications of the COPD Stage I–III patients were as follows: 4 patients received β2-agonists, inhaled corticosteroid and anticholinergics; 4 patients received β2-agonists plus inhaled corticosteroid; 1 received β2-agonists and anticholinergics. None were receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy. Exclusion criteria included allergies, asthma, a history of respiratory disease other than COPD, or respiratory infection less than 8 weeks before entering the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland with written consent and registered (http://www.hus.fi/clinicaltrials). Pulmonary function tests Flow-volume spirometry was performed with a pneumotachograph based spirometer connected to a computer (Medriko M 904, Kuopio, Finland) (Viljanen 1982). The pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and static lung volumes were measured with a single breath method according to the European Respiratory Society. Sputum induction Sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline as recommended by the ERS Task Force and processed for differential counts of inflammatory cells as previously described (Rytila et al 2000; Djukanovic et al 2002). Briefly, samples were treated by adding an equal volume, based on the weight of the sample, of dithioerythritol (DTE, Sigma, Germany) or phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS). The supernatant was frozen at −80 ºC for biochemical and immunological analyses. Cell viability was assessed by Trypan blue in a Burker chamber. Cytocentrifuge slides were prepared by Cytospin at 450 rpm for 6 min. One slide from each patient was stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa-staining (Merck, Germany) for cell differential counts. A total of 400 cells were counted from each slide. The samples having less than 70% of squamous epithelial cells were accepted for further investigations. The slides were frozen at −20 ºC. MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12, TIMP-1, and lactoferrin by ELISA MMP-8, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and lactoferrin levels in sputum supernatant and plasma samples were determined by commercially available ELISA kits (Amersham Biosciences, Cardiff, UK) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. MMP-12 was measured in induced sputum and plasma samples by a custom-made ELISA, as previously described (Demedts et al 2006). The detection limits were: 0.032 ng/ml for MMP-8, 0.6 ng/ml for MMP-9, 0.05 ng/ml for MMP-12, 1.25 ng/ml for TIMP-1 and 1.6 ng/ml for lactoferrin. Immunocytochemical staining of the MMPs, TIMP, MPO and nitrotyrosine MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12, TIMP-1, MPO and nitrotyrosine were also assessed by immunocytochemistry. The cytospin samples were treated with Ortho Permeafix (Ortho Diagnostic Systems Inc., UK). The endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS and for immunostaining, Zymed ABC Histostain-Plus Kit was used according to the manufacturers’ protocol. The samples were incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-human MMP-8 (Hanemaaijer et al 1997), MMP-9 (NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA), TIMP-1 (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA), MPO (LabVision Corp., Fremont, US) or nitrotyrosine (Upstate Lake Placid, NY, USA) or monoclonal MMP-12 (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, US) antibody, and negative control samples with Zymed Rabbit or Mouse (MMP-12) isotype Control and PBS overnight at 4 ºC, and stained with AEC (Zymed Laboratories Inc., South San Francisco, CA) and thereafter with Mayer’s hematoxylin. MMP-8-, MMP-9-, MMP-12-, TIMP-1-, MPO- and nitrotyrosine positive and negative cells were counted (400 cells/cytospin). MMP-9 by zymography and Western blot analysis Sputum supernatant (60 μg protein) was incubated with Laemmli’s sample running buffer. After electrophoresis on 8% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels (SDS SDSPAGE) containing 1 mg/ml gelatine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), as a substrate, the gels were processed and stained with 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 as described (Sorsa et al 1997) for the detection of 92 kD MMP-9 (gelatinase B). For the Western blot analysis, sputum supernatants were lyophilized (total protein content 40 μg per well in 15 μL volume). After 12% SDS-PAGE, the loaded samples were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Shuell, Dassel, Germany). The membranes were first incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-human MMP-9 (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany) and after washing with 0.1% TTBS, treated with the secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc, West Grove, PA). The membranes were developed and quantified for MMP-9 by the Bio-Rad Model GS-700 Imaging Densitometer and AnalystTM program (Sorsa et al 1997). Statistical analysis All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 10.0 software program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). As the data were not normally distributed, non-parametric tests were used for all comparisons. Data for individual variables from the several groups were first analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. Correlations between variables were determined with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Lung function characteristics of non-smokers, healthy smokers and subjects with Stage 0 COPD Lung function characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. All the subjects had normal airway function according to GOLD criteria (post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC >0.7). The cell profile of the induced sputum specimens in Figure Figure11
The levels of MMPs and TIMP-1 in the induced sputum and plasma samples by ELISA Subjects with Stage 0 COPD had higher sputum MMP-8 levels than the non-symptomatic smokers and non-smokers (p = 0.02 and p < 0.0001, Figure Figure2A).2A
To confirm earlier findings on the elevation of MMP-8 and MMP-9 in COPD, their levels were also determined by ELISA in the induced sputum of Stage I–III COPD patients (n = 10). MMP-8 and -9 were significantly elevated in COPD compared to healthy smokers (MMP-8: p < 0.0001; MMP-9: p = 0.01). We also recently found this to be the case with MMP-12 (Demedts et al 2006). Plasma MMP-8 levels did not differ between the subgroups (p = 0.225). Plasma MMP-9 concentrations of smokers were higher than those of non-smokers (p = 0.04), but the difference between smokers without or with symptoms (Stage 0) was not significant (p = 0.62). Plasma MMP-12 levels were significantly higher in Stage 0 patients when compared to the non-symptomatic smokers and non-smokers (p = 0.008). Plasma TIMP-1 levels between the subgroups did not differ. Localisation of MMPs and TIMP-1 in the alveolar macrophages and neutrophils MMP-8, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 were localized in the neutrophils and macrophages. MMP-12 was mainly detected in the macrophages but could also be found in some neutrophils (Figure 3
Detection of active MMP-9 by zymography and Western blotting ELISA detected similar MMP-9 levels in healthy smokers and Stage 0 with individual variation. Therefore MMP-9 was also evaluated by zymography and Western blotting. However, even these methods exhibited extensive variability. Zymography revealed MMP-9 gelatinolytic activity (92 kD pro-MMP-9 and 77–82 kD active MMP-9) both in healthy smokers and those at Stage 0 with no major difference between the groups (Figure (Figure4A).4A
MMP/TIMP ratios in the sputum and plasma No difference was found in the MMP-8/TIMP-1, MMP-9/TIMP-1 or MMP-12/TIMP-1 ratios in the induced sputum of Stage 0, smokers and non-smokers. In contrast, the MMP-8/TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio in plasma was substantially higher in healthy smokers when compared to non-smokers (p = 0.009 and p = 0.02). Patients with Stage 0 had a higher MMP-12/TIMP-1 ratio in plasma than non-symptomatic smokers and non-smokers (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005). Correlation of MMPs and TIMP-1 with inflammatory cells and markers of oxidative stress MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12 and TIMP-1 levels in the induced sputum, assessed by ELISA, generally correlated positively with the total number and percentage of neutrophils (MMP-8: p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002; MMP-9: p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001; MMP-12 p < 0.0001 and p = 0.129; TIMP-1: p = 0.002 and p = 0.004) (Figure (Figure5).5
Mean lactoferrin levels in induced sputum of GOLD Stage 0, smokers and non-smokers were 59.7 ± 18.0, 36.3 ± 11.0 and 28.7 ± 3.42 μg/ml (p = 0.071) and in plasma 772 ± 121, 761 ± 155 and 772 ± 121 ng/ml (p = 0.616), respectively. MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 correlated with sputum lactoferrin (Figure (Figure6)6
Correlation between the levels of MMPs and lung function parameters The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significance of MMPs at the early stages of COPD with normal lung function parameters based on GOLD criteria (FEV/FVC). Special interest was with the airflow parameters in the small airways (MEF50, MEF25). When the various MMPs were correlated with the lung function parameters of all smokers with or without COPD (GOL Stage 0) there was highly significant correlation with all lung function parameters (Table 2).
Discussion The present study suggests that MMP-8 can differentiate symptomatic smokers (Stage 0), ie, those who may be at risk for COPD development (Pauwels et al 2001; Willemse et al 2005; Mannino 2006; Stavem et al 2006) from non-symptomatic chronic smokers. MMP-8 also correlated with the lung function parameters, in particular the correlations with the small airway flow parameters were highly significant. Also MMP-9 and MMP-12 were already elevated in the induced sputum of Stage 0 COPD but neither MMP-9 nor MMP-12, with the exception of plasma MMP-12, appeared to differentiate healthy smokers from Stage 0 patients. MMPs can be activated by ROS, and this study also found a significant association especially between the levels of MMP-8 and MMP-9 and neutrophils and markers of their activation (lactoferrin, MPO). However, as in biological samples in general, there was considerable individual variation in the levels of MMPs and TIMP-1 in both the induced sputum and the plasma specimens. One problem in assessing MMPs in cigarette smokers has been the wide variation in the smoking history and time elapsed from smoking cessation of the control group (Cataldo et al 2000; Kang et al 2003; Culpitt et al 2005). We included a representative group of non-smokers and smokers, who were either symptom-free or exhibiting symptoms. Based on this study only MMP-8 could differentiate symptomatic smokers from healthy chronic smokers with normal FEV1/FVC ie, without major airway obstruction. The levels of MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 in the induced sputum of ex-smokers and lifelong non-smokers were similar suggesting that the effects of smoking on MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 levels may be reversible. Like in many biological measurements there was wide variation in MMP-values within the groups with some outliners in each group. These values and the clinical characteristics of the subjects were carefully re-evaluated. To confirm the elevation of these MMPs in COPD as earlier published (Vernooy et al 2004; Culpitt et al 2005; Mercer et al 2005), additional measurements were conducted with the sputum specimens of Stage I–III COPD patients (Demedts et al 2006), detecting significantly higher levels of these MMPs in COPD subjects in comparison to healthy smokers. Some previous studies have shown MMP-9 elevation in chronic cigarette smokers when compared to non-smokers (Lim et al 2000; Kang et al 2003), but no comparisons were made between asymptomatic and symptomatic smokers. Our recent study found higher MMP-12 levels in the induced sputum of COPD patients when compared to smokers and non-smokers (Demedts et al 2006), but again nonsymptomatic and symptomatic smokers were not compared. Our present results with MMP-8 and Stage 0 are in line with previous suggestions about the special role of MMP-8 in the development of emphysema (Segura-Valdez et al 2000). Since MMP-9 levels as assessed by ELISA were very similar both in non-symptomatic smokers and individuals at Stage 0, its activation was further investigated by zymography and Western blot analysis which showed extensive interindividual variability. MMP-12 levels were higher in patients with Stage 0 than in non-smokers but there was no difference between healthy smokers and individuals at Stage 0. Also MMP-12 showed high variability in the Western blotting analysis (not shown). This does not signify that MMP-12 has no relevance in COPD development (Russell et al 2002b; Demedts et al 2006), but the fact that MMP-12 is already increased in smokers without airway obstruction. MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-12 are known to be expressed in alveolar macrophages (Russell et al 2002a; Vernooy et al 2004; Bracke et al 2005; Molet et al 2005) and MMP-8 and MMP-9 in neutrophils (Cataldo et al 2001; Barnes et al 2003; Beeh et al 2003; Takafuji et al 2003; Vernooy et al 2004; Culpitt et al 2005; Gueders et al 2005). These previous observations were confirmed here and the expressions were similar in healthy and symptomatic smokers. Although MMP-12 is produced by macrophages, its presence or absence in neutrophils has not been reported (Churg et al 2003; Bracke et al 2005; Molet et al 2005). In the present study some neutrophils clearly exhibited MMP-12 immunoreactivity. The relative functional role of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils as cellular sources of these MMPs in COPD is still unclear. The present findings support the importance of neutrophils as all MMPs correlated with neutrophils and markers of neutrophil activation. MMPs were also elevated in the plasma of smokers, in agreement with previous observations (Nakamura et al 1998) and with the fact that COPD is a systemic disease, but also with the fact that MMPs are associated with other smoking-related systemic diseases (Jones et al 2003; MacCallum 2005; Wouters 2005). This is the first study to report the elevated plasma MMP-12 levels in symptomatic smokers, but the relative role of all of these MMPs as systemic markers in COPD progression remains to be clarified. TIMP-1 is a major endogenous inhibitor of MMP-8 and -9 and shown to be elevated in COPD (Beeh et al 2003; Owen et al 2003; Culpitt et al 2005; Higashimoto et al 2005). The sputum MMP-8/TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio did not change significantly in smokers, pointing to a role for TIMP-1 as a natural defense mechanism in preventing tissue destruction. The conformation of latent MMPs is maintained by thiol interactions between Cys-residues in the prodomain and the zinc atom present in the catalytic site of all MMPs. Disruption of this interaction is thought to represent the critical step in initiating the process of MMP autoactivation. ROS are known to reversibly react with -SH groups, such as those involved in preserving MMP latency (Rajagopalan et al 1996). Recent studies from our laboratory and others have indicated that cigarette smoke can elevate the oxidant burden also in healthy humans without airway obstruction (Rytila et al 2006). The present study not only found increased levels of MMPs, especially MMP-8 in healthy smokers and those with symptoms (Stage 0), but also found a significant correlation between MMP-8, MMP-9 and the levels of MPO and lactoferrin, both of which are neutrophil-derived markers of oxidant generation. These findings further support the hypothesis that especially neutrophil derived oxidants, may significantly activate/induce the tissue destructive MMPs already in the lungs of healthy cigarette smokers. We did not find any association between MMPs and nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity showing also the complexity between smoking, oxidative stress and the expression of oxidized/nitrosylated proteins in sputum inflammatory cells. In conclusion, MMPs, especially MMP-8, may function as sensitive biomarkers in COPD development. The relative role of various MMPs as markers of COPD and its progression remains to be clarified in future longitudinal investigations. Acknowledgments Tiina Marjomaa, Merja Luukkonen and Ritva Keva are acknowledged for their excellent technical assistance, Antero Kokkonen and the Jaakko Pöyry Company for helping us in the recruitment of the non-smokers and smokers. We are very grateful to every subject who agreed to participate in this study. This work was supported by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, The Finnish Antituberculosis Association Foundation, Jansson Foundation, the Helsinki University Hospital (HUCH-EVO), the Academy of Finland and the ERS COPD Travel Grant for Best Posters 2005. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Lancet. 2003 Sep 27; 362(9389):1053-61.
[Lancet. 2003]N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 24; 350(26):2645-53.
[N Engl J Med. 2004]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr; 163(5):1256-76.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 1; 166(3):329-32.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002]Respir Res. 2005 Aug 25; 6():98.
[Respir Res. 2005]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 May; 163(6):1304-9.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001]Biochem Soc Trans. 2002 Apr; 30(2):98-102.
[Biochem Soc Trans. 2002]Pharmacol Rev. 2004 Dec; 56(4):515-48.
[Pharmacol Rev. 2004]J Clin Invest. 1996 Dec 1; 98(11):2572-9.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]Free Radic Biol Med. 2004 Sep 15; 37(6):768-84.
[Free Radic Biol Med. 2004]Science. 1997 Sep 26; 277(5334):2002-4.
[Science. 1997]Respir Med. 2003 Jun; 97(6):634-9.
[Respir Med. 2003]Chest. 2004 Dec; 126(6):1802-10.
[Chest. 2004]Respir Med. 2005 Jun; 99(6):703-10.
[Respir Med. 2005]Thorax. 2006 Mar; 61(3):196-201.
[Thorax. 2006]Eur Respir J Suppl. 2002 Sep; 37():1s-2s.
[Eur Respir J Suppl. 2002]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):S77-121.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr; 163(5):1256-76.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001]Eur Respir J. 2000 Jun; 15(6):1116-9.
[Eur Respir J. 2000]Eur Respir J Suppl. 2002 Sep; 37():1s-2s.
[Eur Respir J Suppl. 2002]Thorax. 2006 Mar; 61(3):196-201.
[Thorax. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 12; 272(50):31504-9.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1997 Aug 22; 272(34):21067-74.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1997 Aug 22; 272(34):21067-74.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Thorax. 2006 Mar; 61(3):196-201.
[Thorax. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1997 Aug 22; 272(34):21067-74.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr; 163(5):1256-76.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001]Respir Res. 2005 Apr 25; 6():38.
[Respir Res. 2005]Chest. 2006 Aug; 130(2):309-10.
[Chest. 2006]Chest. 2006 Aug; 130(2):318-25.
[Chest. 2006]Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2000 Nov; 123(3):259-67.
[Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2000]J Korean Med Sci. 2003 Dec; 18(6):821-7.
[J Korean Med Sci. 2003]Respir Med. 2005 Jun; 99(6):703-10.
[Respir Med. 2005]Chest. 2004 Dec; 126(6):1802-10.
[Chest. 2004]Respir Res. 2005 Dec 22; 6():151.
[Respir Res. 2005]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct; 162(4 Pt 1):1355-60.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000]J Korean Med Sci. 2003 Dec; 18(6):821-7.
[J Korean Med Sci. 2003]Thorax. 2006 Mar; 61(3):196-201.
[Thorax. 2006]Chest. 2000 Mar; 117(3):684-94.
[Chest. 2000]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002 Oct; 283(4):L867-73.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002]Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002 May; 26(5):602-9.
[Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002]Chest. 2004 Dec; 126(6):1802-10.
[Chest. 2004]Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005 Oct; 138(2):169-79.
[Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005]Inflamm Res. 2005 Jan; 54(1):31-6.
[Inflamm Res. 2005]Allergy. 2001 Feb; 56(2):145-51.
[Allergy. 2001]Clin Chim Acta. 1998 Aug 28; 276(2):173-7.
[Clin Chim Acta. 1998]Cardiovasc Res. 2003 Oct 1; 59(4):812-23.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2003]Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005; 2(1):34-43.
[Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005]Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005; 2(1):26-33.
[Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005]Respir Med. 2003 Jun; 97(6):634-9.
[Respir Med. 2003]Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003 Sep; 29(3 Pt 1):283-94.
[Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003]Respir Med. 2005 Jun; 99(6):703-10.
[Respir Med. 2005]Eur Respir J. 2005 May; 25(5):885-90.
[Eur Respir J. 2005]J Clin Invest. 1996 Dec 1; 98(11):2572-9.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]Respir Res. 2006 Apr 28; 7():69.
[Respir Res. 2006]