|
|
PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(6): e5912. Published online 2009 June 15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005912. | PMCID: PMC2691579 |
Copyright Wang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The Function of a Spindle Checkpoint Gene bub-1 in C. elegans Development Xiangming Wang,#1 Min Liu,#1 Weida Li,1 Christopher D. Suh,2,3 Zuoyan Zhu,1 Yishi Jin,2,3 and Qichang Fan1* 1School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China 2Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, Sinsheimer Laboratories, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America 3Division of Biological Sciences, Neurobiology Section, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America Dong-Yan Jin, Editor University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Received June 7, 2008; Accepted May 7, 2009. Background The serine/threonine kinase BUB1 (Budding Uninhibited by Benzimidazole 1) was originally identified in yeast as a checkpoint protein, based on its mutant's incapacity of delaying the cell cycle in response to loss of microtubules. Our understanding of its function is primarily from studies carried out in yeast S. cerevisiae. It has been shown that it is a component of the mitotic spindle checkpoint and regulates the separation of sister chromatids through its downstream molecules. However, its roles in multi-cellular organisms remain unclear. Methods and Findings In nematode C. elegans, rapid cell divisions primarily occur in embryos and in germline of postembryonic larvae and adults. In addition, a select set of cells undergo a few rounds of cell division postembryonically. One common phenotype associated with impaired cell division is described as Stu ( Sterile and Uncoordinated) [1], [2]. We conducted a genetic screen for zygotic mutants that displayed Stu phenotype in C. elegans. We isolated seven Stu mutants that fell into five complementation groups. We report here that two mutations, FanWang5 ( fw5) and FanWang8 ( fw8) affect the bub-1 gene, a homolog of yeast BUB1. Both mutant alleles of fw5 and fw8 exhibited variable behavioral defects, including developmental arrest, uncoordination and sterility. The number of postembryonically born neurons in the ventral cord decreased and their axon morphology was abnormal. Also, the decrease of neurons in the ventral cord phenotype could not be suppressed by a caspase-3 loss-of-function mutant. In addition, bub-1( fw5 and fw8) mutants showed widespread effects on postembryonic development in many cell lineages. We found that bub-1 functioned maternally in several developmental lineages at the embryonic stage in C. elegans. Studies in yeast have shown that BUB1 functions as a spindle checkpoint protein by regulating the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). We performed double mutant analysis and observed that bub-1 genetically interacted with several downstream genes, including fzy-1/ CDC20, mat-2/ APC1 and emb-27/ APC6. Conclusions Our results demonstrate a conserved role of bub-1 in cell-cycle regulation and reveal that C. elegans bub-1 is required both maternally and zygotically. Further, our genetic analysis is consistent with that the function of bub-1 in C. elegans is likely similar to its yeast and mammalian homologs. Precise chromosome segregation during cell division is controlled by a feedback mechanism [3]. During the mitotic cell cycle, the metaphase-to-anaphase transition occurs after all chromosomes have established precise bipolar attachments to the mitotic spindles [4]. The spindle checkpoint inhibits anaphase onset until kinetochores are properly bound with the spindle microtubules [5], [6]. Malfunction of the spindle checkpoint leads to precocious anaphase and chromosomal missegregation, and results in subsequent loss of genetic fidelity. Misregulation of the spindle checkpoint has been suggested as a major cause of fatality and cancer [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. In 1990s, several groups have isolated a number of genes involved in the budding yeast spindle checkpoint, including MAD1 ( Mitotic Arrest Deficient 1), MAD2, MAD3 [12], BUB1, BUB2, BUB3 [13], and MPS1 ( Mono polar spindle 1) [14]. BUB1 is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates the separation of sister chromatids. Studies from yeast have also shown that BUB1 acts through APC/C, a large multi-subunit E3 ubiquitin ligase [15], [16]. In addition, BUB1 localizes at the kinetochore during the very early stages of mitosis, and is required for kinetochore localization of MAD1 and MAD2, independent of its kinase activity [9]. Following the localization of BUB1, MAD1 then lowers the energy barrier of MAD2 and triggers MAD2 conformational change, allowing MAD2 binding to the APC/C activator CDC20. After the formation of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which contains BUBR1-BUB3-MAD2-CDC20, APC/C is inhibited by the complex [17]. This process results in the stabilization of securin, an inhibitor keeping separase inactive, and also hindrance of sister chromatids separation [18]. In mammalian cells, phosphorylation of CDC20 by BUB1 has also been shown to inhibit the function of CDC20 [19]. In C. elegans, components of the spindle checkpoint are functionally conserved [20], [21]. C. elegans has a single homolog of BUB1, bub-1. Antibody staining at one-cell stage shows that BUB-1 is an essential component in the mitotic kinetochore [22], consistent with its function in spindle checkpoint. RNAi of bub-1 in wild type results in embryonic arrest, and partially restores mitotic timing at one-cell stage in conditional embryonic-lethal apo-5( or358ts) mutant embryos with cytoskeletal abnormalities, suggesting that bub-1 may be associated with spindle checkpoint at the early embryonic stage [23]. Studies of putative downstream genes of bub-1: mdf-1/ MAD1, mdf-2/ MAD2, mdf-3/ MAD3, and fzy-1/ CDC20 have also shown that these genes function during spindle checkpoint process [3], [24]. In a genetic screen for zygotic mutants that are likely associated with cell cycle defects, we isolated two bub-1 mutant alleles. Our analysis shows that bub-1 functions in multiple cell lineages and plays essential roles in the development of C. elegans. New Stu mutant screen In C. elegans, some of the cell cycle mutants show morphological and behavioral defects including Stu and Emb (Abnormal EMBryogenesis). Emb commonly leads to embryonic lethality, while Stu mutants are often associated with defects in the development of gonads (sterility) or neurons in the ventral nerve cord (uncoordination) [25], [26], [27]. Some Stu mutants survive through embryonic development, likely due to maternal deposit of normal gene products [25]. In an effort to identify new cell cycle related genes in C. elegans, we conducted a clonal screen for Stu mutants using a GFP marker juIs76 [P unc-25::GFP] that visualizes the D-type ventral cord motor neurons, which include embryonically born DD neurons and postembryonically born VD neurons [28]. We isolated seven Stu mutants from 3500 haploid genomes. By linkage group mapping and complementation tests, we found that these mutants fell into five complementation groups, of which one was a mcm-5 allele that we had reported previously [29]. Table 1 shows the remaining four mutant complementation groups and their phenotypes. All animals isolated showed uncoordination, larval arrest, sterility and vulva defects (either vulvaless or protruding vulva). These phenotypic defects are commonly observed in animals with abnormal postembryonic development [27]. | Table 1Summary of the Developmental Phenotypes of Stu Mutants. |
All new Stu animals have motor neuron defects The generation of adult ventral nerve cord involves a series of postembryonic cell division in late L1 larvae, resulting in a fixed number of neurons arranged in a stereotypic manner [30]. To evaluate the mutant phenotype, we counted the number of ventral cord motor neurons. In wild type animals, P unc-25::GFP visualizes 6 DD and 13 VD neurons in the ventral nerve cord [28]. The DD neurons are born at the embryonic stage, whereas VD neurons are born at the L1 larvae stage. All mutants had normal number of DD neurons in L1 larvae (data not shown). However, in later larvae (L2 or older) and adults, all mutants showed a general decrease in the number of GFP-expressing VD neurons (). To confirm our findings, we used a pan-neuronal marker evIs111 [31] and DAPI staining. The result showed that the mutants were missing many neurons, consistent with previous findings (data not shown). As reported previously, impairment in cell cycle often causes defects in cell morphology [26]. By examining the morphology of motor neurons in the mutants, we found that some VD neuron axons showed defective morphology in several mutants ( and Table 2). | Table 2Summary of the D-Type Motor Neuron and Axon Phenotypes of Stu Mutants. |
Both fw5 and fw8 are mutations in bub-1 To identify the corresponding genes of the new Stu mutations, we performed snip-SNP mapping (see Materials and Methods) [32]. We mapped fw5 and fw8 to the same interval (between the SNP marker of B0041:6882 and VF39H2L: 3079) on the chromosome I. Further, fw5 and fw8 failed to complement. Both fw5 and fw8 were balanced by dpy-5( e61) unc-29( e403) for stock keeping. We tested a set of RNAi clones covering the interval, and found that RNAi escapers of bub-1 led to reduced number of D-type neurons as well as Emb (data not shown). We then sequenced fw5 and fw8, and identified nucleotide alterations in the bub-1 gene in both alleles (). In C. elegans, the bub-1 gene encodes a 987aa protein with a conserved kinase domain at its C-terminal (). The mutations in fw5 and fw8 result in stop codon at W848 and W726, respectively, which produce truncated proteins lacking the kinase domain. We also obtained a deletion mutant, tm2815, which had an in-frame deletion of 105 amino acids from E473 to A586 in the middle of the protein, with unaffected kinase domain (). Homozygous tm2815 animals displayed embryonic arrest, larval arrest and sterility. However, the phenotypes observed in the deletion allele were weaker than those of fw5 or fw8. We also generated tm2815/ fw5 and tm2815/ fw8 animals and found that a larger number of surviving adult stage animals compared to homozygous fw5 or fw8 ( Table 1). This result indicates that tm2815 mutant behaves as a partial loss of function mutation, and fw5 and fw8 are more likely to be null mutations of bub-1. We also performed transgenic rescue of the bub-1 mutant using a PCR product which encompasses the region from 1.40-kb upstream to 0.82-kb downstream of the bub-1 locus. We obtained two transgenic fw8 homozygous lines after injecting the PCR product to the dpy-5(e61) unc-29(e403)/fw8 animals. In both lines, the mutant phenotypes were fully rescued. Furthermore, expression of bub-1 driven by a pan-neuronal promoter (the promoter of unc-119) was also able to rescue the neuronal defect of fw8 as well. All three transgenic lines showed partial rescue of the loss of D type neurons (the t-test compared to control fw8; juIs76: P<0.001) (). These results suggest that BUB-1 is responsible for the Stu phenotypes of fw8, and bub-1 functions in the nervous system in a cell-autonomous manner. The neuronal defect of fw8 is unlikely caused by caspase-dependent programmed cell death As mentioned earlier, the number of VD neurons was reduced in bub-1( fw8) mutants (). The loss of neurons could be due to abnormal cell division [33] or enhanced apoptosis [34], [35]. To examine these possibilities, we constructed a bub-1( fw8); ced-3( n717) double mutant in which programmed cell death would be blocked due to the loss of CED-3 caspase activity [36]. We found that bub-1( fw8) and bub-1( fw8); ced-3( n717) resulted in similar numbers of D-type neurons [average 8.7 (n  = 244) and 8.3 (n = 31), respectively] ( Table 3). This result indicates that caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death is unlikely responsible for the loss of motor neuron in bub-1( fw8). However, we could not rule out the possibility of caspase-3-independent cell death in bub-1( fw8) mutant. | Table 3Number of D Type Motor Neuron in bub-1(fw8); ced-3(n717) Mutants. |
bub-1 is required both maternally and zygotically The fact that bub-1 mutants caused only postembryonic-born VD neuron defects suggested two possible reasons: 1) bub-1 is a maternal gene and 2) bub-1 is specifically required at postembryonic stages. A bub-1 promoter driven GFP was widely expressed from early embryonic stages to three fold stage (). Anti-BUB-1 antibody staining also showed BUB-1 was present at the one-cell stage [22], and during the late embryonic stage (). To examine the roles of bub-1 in early embryos, we fed bub-1 RNAi to the eri-1( mg366); juIs76 animals, which sensitized the RNAi effect [37]. We found that approximately 90% of the progenies from the RNAi-fed parents showed the Emb phenotype (n = 779). To characterize at which stage the embryos arrested, we stained the Emb embryos with DAPI and found that approximately 1% of them arrested at the early embryonic stage (an average of twenty nuclei, n = 107), while about 94% arrested at late embryonic stage (an average of 100 nuclei, n = 107). Only a few of the embryos arrested at the comma stage (5.6%, n = 107). These observations indicate that BUB-1 is required maternally during embryogenesis, in addition to its zygotic roles in postembryonic development. Effects of bub-1 in postembryonic development In C. elegans, multiple types of tissues undergo several rounds of cell divisions during postembryonic development. Using a panel of markers, we examined the development of several tissues in bub-1 mutants as described below. Intestinal nuclei division but not endoreduplication was defective The transgenic GFP line rrIs1 was used to visualize the nuclei of the intestine cells (). In wide type late L1 animals, the intestine cells have 30 to 34 diploid nuclei. All intestinal nuclei endoreduplicate their DNA prior to each of the four molts, thereby producing the 32 n DNA content nuclei in the adult intestine [39]. We found, however, about 24 intestinal nuclei in the bub-1( fw8) mutant L4 larvae (n = 17) (). In addition, some of the intestinal nuclei were elongated and showed a thread structure, suggesting a defect in chromosomal segregation [25]. This observation was consistent with the DAPI staining experiment (). Furthermore, we checked the DNA content of the intestinal nuclei in the bub-1( fw8) L4 or adults. Using body wall muscle nuclei as an internal 2 n control, we determined that the amount of DNA in the intestinal lineages was 24.3 n in the bub-1( fw8) mutant, while 28.4 n in the WT (). If the arrest of cell division prior to L4 stage and the lack of the last DNA replication before L4 to adult molt are taken into account, we tend to believe that the intestinal nuclei endoreduplication might not be affected by the loss of bub-1 function. However, the cell division may be affected. Division of seam cells was severely disrupted We used a transgenic GFP line wIs51 to visualize the nuclei of seam cells [40] (). Ten seam cells aligned on each side of the body undergo stage-specific division patterns at each of four (L1–L4) postembryonic larval stages. From the L2 to L4 stage, the wild type animal has 16 seam cells [38]. In most of the bub-1( fw8) L4 mutants, only the two most anterior seam cells H0 were present (). These H0 cells normally do not undergo postembryonic division [41]. These results indicate a severe failure in postembryonic division of seam cells. Gonad development was severely impaired The transgenic GFP line qIs56 allowed us to visualize the two distal tip cells (DTCs) of the U-shaped gonads [42] (). The gonad arms acquire their U-shape by directed migration of the DTC. The arm elongation begins at the L2 stage and continues until the L4 molt [38]. We observed that about half of bub-1( fw8) animals showed only one gonad arm, and most of them stopped development prematurely (n = 32) (). Among the 48 gonad arms scored, 9 grew one quarter or less of the normal gonad length; 15 gonad arms grew less than one half of the normal length; and 10 gonad arms grew about three quarters of the normal length. Furthermore, the number of germ cells in bub-1( fw8) was decreased to about 117 per arm (n = 11) (compared to about 1000 in wild type). In the abnormal gonads, we did not observe any eggs. Sperms, however, formed only in 2 of the 9 bub-1 mutant animals observed by DAPI staining (). Ventral cord motor neurons We used a transgenic GFP strain, juIs14 [33], to visualize the cholinergic DA, DB, VA, and VB neurons (). We observed a decreased number of neurons expressing GFP in the bub-1( fw8) mutant. Normally, embryonic-born DAs and DBs have commissural projections to the dorsal cord, while postembryonic-born VAs and VBs do not [38]. We found that the number of commissural projections to the dorsal cord was unchanged in the bub-1( fw8) mutant, and the axons of these neurons did not show any morphological defects (data not shown). Therefore, embryonic-born DAs and DBs were not affected, while most postembryonic-born VAs and VBs were missing in the bub-1( fw8) mutant. Genetic interaction analysis supports a role of BUB-1 in the spindle checkpoint pathway Previous studies have shown that several components of the spindle assembly pathway are functionally conserved in nematodes and yeast [20], [21]. For example, the loss-of-function of mdf-1/ MAD1 causes embryonic and larval arrest [3], similar to the yeast mutant. Further, the lethal phenotype of mdf-1/ MAD1 is suppressed by the mutations in the downstream genes, such as fzy-1/ CDC20 [20], and APC/C homologues, such as emb-30/ APC4 [43] and such-1/ APC5-like [44]. To test if bub-1 acts in the spindle checkpoint pathway, we examined genetic interactions between bub-1( fw8) and several candidate downstream genes. fzy-1/ CDC20 is an activator of APC/C at the transition from metaphase to anaphase. A previous study demonstrated that BUB1 inhibited CDC20 in cultured mammalian cells [19]. In C. elegans, fzy-1 ( h1983) did not exhibit major developmental abnormalities, except for the smaller brood size [20]. Consistently, we found that fzy-1( h1983) did not affect postembryonic neuronal cell division (). In the wild type worm, about 33 DA, DB, VA, and VB neurons are present along the ventral cord, not including the head ganglia neurons. In bub-1( fw8) worm (n = 105), only 13 were present. However, in the fzy-1( h1983); bub-1( fw8) double mutant, there were approximately 17 DA, DB, VA, and VB neurons present (n = 26). Moreover, 51.06% of double mutants of fzy-1( h1983); bub-1( fw8) survived to adulthood, compared to 26.03% of bub-1( fw8) (). These results indicate that the effects from the bub-1 mutation are partially suppressed by the mutation of fzy-1/ CDC20, consistent with fzy-1 acting downstream of bub-1. fzr-1/ CDH1/ HCT1 is another activator of APC/C required for exit of mitosis [45] and shows sequence similarity to fzy-1. In C. elegans, fzr-1 ( ok380 and ku298 alleles) did not exhibit major developmental abnormalities. To examine the genetic interaction between bub-1 and fzr-1, we made double mutants of bub-1( fw8) and fzr-1 ( ok380 and ku298 alleles). The survivability of both allelic double mutants was indistinguishable from bub-1( fw8) (data not shown). Thus, fzy-1 is most likely a downstream regulator of bub-1, but not fzr-1, in C. elegans. mat-2/ APC1 and emb-27/ APC6 are two APC/ C subunits. Previous studies have shown that these subunits might function during meiosis. mat-2( ax102) and emb-27( g48) are temperature sensitive mutants that can be maintained as fertile adults at 15°C. By temperature shift experiments (see Methods), we observed that, while most bub-1( fw8) mutants arrested at different larvae stage, 75.5% and 69.8% of bub-1( fw8); mat-2( ax102) and the bub-1( fw8); emb-27( g48) double mutants respectively developed into sterile adults ( Table 4). This study showed that mat-2( ax102) and emb-27( g48) partially suppressed the larval arrest phenotype of bub-1( fw8). It suggests that bub-1 may function through the downstream factors of APC/C. | Table 4Adult Sterility in Double Mutants of bub-1(fw8) with APC/C Subunits. |
Identification and characterization of loss-of-function mutations of C. elegans bub-1, a cell cycle spindle checkpoint gene Our conclusion that fw5 and fw8 are loss of function mutations in bub-1 is based on the following results: 1) they failed to complement with each other; and were mapped to the same genetic interval; 2) RNAi against bub-1 exhibited the same phenotypes as fw5 and fw8; 3) sequencing data showed that fw5 and fw8 both contained nonsense mutations in the bub-1 coding sequence; 4) an in-frame deletion mutant of bub-1 (tm2815) failed to complement with fw5 and fw8, and exhibited weaker phenotypes than fw5 and fw8; and 5) fw5 and fw8 could be rescued by bub-1 DNA and partially rescued by expression of bub-1 gene driven by a pan-neuronal promoter. BUB-1 may have both kinase-dependent and kinase-independent functions Compared to our bub-1 mutant fw5 and fw8, the deletion mutant bub-1( tm2815) showed milder defects. This is likely due to an existing partial function of bub-1( tm2815). Based on sequence alignment among different species, Bub1 has a conserved kinase domain at the C-terminus. Both fw5 and fw8 have premature stop codon prior to the kinase domain, whereas bub-1( tm2815) has an in-frame deletion which leaves an intact kinase domain. This might explain why fw5 and fw8 have more severe defects than bub-1( tm2815). Furthermore, this difference might suggest that bub-1 functions beyond a kinase. In yeast, BUB1 is required for kinetochore localization of MAD1 and MAD2 independent of its kinase activity [9]. Further, mdf-1 (mitotic arrest defective) and mdf-2 were identified as homologs of MAD1 and MAD2, and both exhibited conserved function in nematode and yeast [3]. Whether or not the kinase-independent function of bub-1 exists in C. elegans still needs to be investigated further. Our studies demonstrate that the cell cycle control gene bub-1 functions widely in the development of C. elegans. The bub-1 null mutants exhibited defects in several developmental lineages, including seam cells, intestine nuclei, vulva, gonad, germ cells, and ventral cord neurons. Other postembryonic cell lineages we inspected were also defective in bub-1 mutants (data not shown). In bub-1( fw5, fw8) mutants, all of the neurons in the ventral cord developed at the embryonic stage were intact, such as DAs, DBs, and DDs; while most of the postembryonic-born neurons were missing, such as VAs, VBs, and VDs. Our RNAi experiment shows that bub-1 is a maternal gene and the maternal effect of bub-1 is strong enough to support embryonic development even to the adult stage in bub-1 mutants. In C. elegans, some cell cycle-related genes also show long lasting maternal function. For example, cye-1 Cyclin E deletion animals showed surprisingly normal development until the L3 stage, although RNAi resulted in embryonic lethality at nearly the hundred-cell stage [46], [47]. The endoreduplication may not be affected by the loss of bub-1 function Metazoans have various types of cell cycles during development. Endoreduplication is a specific type of cell cycle that skips the M phase. In C. elegans, such endoreduplication type of cell cycle takes place in the intestine and hypodermis during development [39]. Intestinal nuclei go through an endoreduplication cycle before each molt, which results in adults with intestinal nuclei with a 32 n DNA content. In adult animals or L4 with bub-1( fw8) mutants, we found that the amount of DNA was not affected. This result suggests that bub-1 function is specifically required for the spindle checkpoint in the M phase, which is missing from the endoreduplication in the C. elegans intestinal cells. The bub-1-associated spindle checkpoint pathway is conserved in C. elegans Studies in yeast and mammals show that BUB1 kinase acts on the upstream of CDC20 [17], [18], [19]. Consistent with these studies, we found that h1983, a partial loss of function allele of fzy-1/ CDC20, partially suppressed the bub-1( fw8) phenotype. In fzy-1( h1983); bub-1( fw8) double mutant, the function of bub-1 was abolished and fzy-1 was not inhibited. As a result, the fzy-1( h1983) mutation partially complemented this defect and suppressed the phenotype of bub-1( fw8). mat-2( ax102) and emb-27( g48) also partially suppressed the bub-1( fw8) phenotype. These genetic analyses support the idea that fzy-1 and APC/C are downstream targets of bub-1 in C. elegans. However, we do not know whether BUB-1 functions through MDF-1/MAD1, MDF-2/MAD2 or phosphorylation of FZY-1 to inhibit FZY-1. Culture conditions and strains C. elegans strains were maintained at 20°C on nematode growth medium (NGM) seeded with E. coli strain OP50 as described by Brenner [48]. The temperature-sensitive strains were maintained at 15°C, and examined at 25°C. Mutations used in this study were as follows: LGI: bub-1( tm2815) LGII: emb-27( g48), fzr-1( ok380, ku298), fzy-1( h1983), mat-2( ax102) LGIV: eri-1( mg366), ced-3( n717). Transgenic markers were: juIs76 [P unc-25::GFP] [28]; oxIs12 [P unc-47::GFP] [49]; juIs14 [P acr-2::GFP] [33]; qIs56 [P lag-2::GFP; unc-119( +)] [42]; rrIs1 [P elt-2::GFP] [50]; wIs51 [ SCM::GFP, unc-119( +)] (SCM stands for seam cell specific promoter), [40]; and evIs111 [P F25B3.3::GFP] [51]. Genetic screen for Stu mutants CZ1200 juIs76 [P unc-25::GFP] animals were synchronized by lysing the adult hermaphrodites, using alkaline hypochlorite (0.5% sodium hypochlorite, 0.5 N NaOH). The synchronized L4 animals were then treated with 50 mM ethyl methane sulfonate as described [52]. F1 progeny were placed on 1 animal per plate. Sterile or larval arrested, and Stu animals among the F2 progeny were examined further for the number and morphology of postembryonic neurons using the P unc-25::GFP marker. Strains were maintained by propagating heterozygous animals. Out-crossing, mapping and complementation testing All of the mutants were out-crossed at least twice with N2. The mutants were mapped using standard snip-SNP assay [32] and the three-factor mapping technique [52]. The mutants mapped to similar genetic loci were tested. fw2 and fw3 were allelic, as were fw5 and fw8. For the complementation procedure, we used heterozygous bub-1( fw5)/+ males to cross with the balanced strain dpy-5( e61) unc-29( e403)/ dpy-5( e61) bub-1( fw8). The progenies bub-1( fw5)/ dpy-5( e61) bub-1( fw8) were sterile and uncoordinated, which was similar to the fw5 or fw8 homozygous mutants. Complementation tests with known genes were also performed. These genes were within the same loci and generated similar phenotypes. Phenotypic quantification of Stu mutants L4 Heterozygous balanced mutants, such as dpy-5(e61) unc-29(e403)/bub-1(fw8), were cultured at 20°C and transferred everyday to new plates to obtain synchronized progenies. From these plates, the uncoordinated F1 animals were transferred to new plates and cultured for about 5 days at 20°C to quantify the final phenotype. Larval arrest phenotype was quantified according to body size. The absence of fertilized eggs was scored as sterility. For the adult Stu animals, vulval morphology was quantified by mounting them in 2% agar pads and viewed under a stereoscope. Animals with protruding vulva were scored as Pvl, and others without vulva were scored as Vul. The D-type neuron phenotype of L1 stage animals were quantified 10 hours later after lysing the adult heterozygous mutants (+/−), using alkaline hypochlorite. A quarter of the population in these L1 animals become homozygous mutants (−/−). Nomarski fluorescent microscope examination Live animals were mounted to M9 solution in 2% agar pads and viewed under Leica and Zeiss microscopes. Images were captured using a Leica DC500 or a Zeiss AxioCam. Molecular analysis of bub-1 To identify the mutations in fw5 and fw8, the sequences for the exons and exon-intron boundaries of bub-1 were amplified from homozygous mutant animals using the following primers: first pair ( 5′gcgtcctttctactttga3′, 5′gcttttcccgagttattt3′); second pair ( 5′ttcaatgcgggttctaag3′, 5′ctggagggttaccatctt3′); third pair ( 5′tcgtcggatacaaagtct3′, 5′ggttggagcaacaaatac3′); fourth pair ( 5′tttcaaaccgtctcgtgg3′, 5′tcaggcgattccgcattt3′); fifth pair ( 5′gtcaaggtggatacgctaa3′, 5′actttcctgcaacaacga3′); and sixth pair ( 5′aatggctgtcgttgttgc3′, 5′ ttctaccgtgatgggtct3′). The mutations were confirmed by sequencing from both directions (through two different reactions). To generate a bub-1 promoter-driven GFP construct, duplex PCR [53] was conducted to amplify the 1266 bps bub-1 upstream sequence from N2 genomic DNA using the following primer set. 5′gattcccacaagtaggtc3′ and 5′agtcgacctgcaggcatgcaagcttcaaagtagaaaggacgcga3′. The final P bub-1::GFP DNA fragment (100 ng/µl) was injected into the N2 strain using a pRF4 plasmid (100 ng/µl) as co-injection marker. Two lines were obtained and both showed similar expression patterns. Microinjection to rescue fw8 phenotype To rescue bub-1( fw8), a region from 1.40-kb upstream to 0.82-kb downstream of the bub-1 locus was amplified from genome DNA with PCR primers 5′tcgaatcgcagttcttgtc3′ and 5′gagccatcagcttggttgt3′. The PCR product was injected (co-injected with pRF-4[ rol-6( su1006)] at 80 ng/µl) to the balanced strain dpy-5( e61) unc-29( e403)/ bub-1( fw8) at 40 ng/µl. In total, we obtained two transgenic lines. The full coding sequence of bub-1 was cloned into the plasmid pBY103 (kindly provided by Dr. X. Huang) which contained the promoter of unc-119 [54]. Based on their cloning data, KpnI/ SacI double digestion was used to obtain the PCR product of bub-1 genomic sequence. The P unc-119::bub-1 plasmid was injected (co-injected with pRF-4[ rol-6( su1006)] at 80 ng/µl) to the balanced strain dpy-5( e61) unc-29( e403)/ bub-1( fw8) at 40 ng/µl. We obtained two transgenic lines. However, at 80 ng/µl, we obtained only one line and in the F1 progenies many larvae were lethal. Antibody staining The freeze-crack method was used for permeabilization and fixation of the embryos [55]. The rabbit polyclonal antibody against BUB-1 (1 ![[ratio]](/corehtml/pmc/pmcents/x2236.gif) 1000, a gift from Dr. Hyman [22]) was used, followed by the FITC conjugated mouse anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1 1000). RNAi by feeding RNAi clones were made by J. Ahringer's laboratory [56], and obtained from the MRC service (UK). The bacteria expressing dsRNA of appropriate genes were cultured at 37°C overnight and seeded onto the NGM plates (containing 50 µg/mL Amp, 1 mM IPTG). The plates were kept at room temperature for two days. Three L4 CZ5547 ( mg366; juIs76) animals were transferred to the plates. Two days later, the animals were then transferred to a second plate with the same interfering bacteria. About 10 hours later, the animals were removed and the embryos were cultured for a period of several days in order to examine the phenotype. The results were scored from the second plate, which displayed a better representation of the gene's mutant phenotype. DAPI staining Approximately 30 mutant animals were placed into M9 on a microscope slide and covered with coverslip. The slide was quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and put into a pre-cooled iron block. The coverslip was then quickly removed. The slide was sequentially placed in methanol and then acetone for 10 minutes each at −20°C. After air drying, animals were treated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) and covered with a coverslip [55]. DNA quantitation To quantitate DNA content, nuclei images of DAPI-stained animals were taken with a Zeiss AxioCam, and images were analyzed with NIH ImageJ 1.40 g software. Using body wall muscle nuclei as a 2 n DNA standard, C values of intestinal nuclei were estimated by their DAPI-based densitometric quantifications [57], [58]. Double mutant analysis of bub-1(fw8) and mat-2(ax102), emb-27(g48) Young adult stage double mutants dpy-5(e61) unc-29(e403)/bub-1(fw8); mat-2(ax102) and dpy-5(e61) unc-29(e403)/bub-1(fw8); emb-27(g48) were cultured at 15°C for two hours to lay eggs to bypass the meiosis requirement of APC/C. Then, the eggs were transferred to a temperature of 25°C. The phenotypes were scored as above. The dpy-5(e61) unc-29(e403)/bub-1(fw8) animals were treated with the same procedures as the control. The authors thank A. M. Rose, H. Zhang, X. C. Wang, the Japanese Knockout Consortium and the Caenorhabditis elegans Genetic Center for strains, A. A. Hyman for anti-BUB-1 antibody, L. Liu, D. Liu, X. Huang, and X. C. Wang for suggestions on the manuscript, F. F. Zhang, T. Ma, and L. Lu for some mapping work. 1. Horvitz HR, Sulston JE. Isolation and genetic characterization of cell-lineage mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1980;96:435–454. [PubMed] 2. Sulston JE, Horvitz HR. Abnormal cell lineages in mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1981;82:41–55. [PubMed] 3. Kitagawa R, Rose AM. Components of the spindle-assembly checkpoint are essential in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:514–521. [PubMed] 4. Chen RH. Phosphorylation and activation of Bub1 on unattached chromosomes facilitate the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 2004;23:3113–3121. [PubMed] 5. Li X, Nicklas RB. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature. 1995;373:630–632. [PubMed] 6. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol. 1995;130:941–948. [PubMed] 7. Jin DY, Spencer F, Jeang KT. Human T cell leukemia virus type 1 oncoprotein Tax targets the human mitotic checkpoint protein MAD1. Cell. 1998;93:81–91. [PubMed] 8. Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, Riggins GJ, Willson JK, et al. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature. 1998;392:300–303. [PubMed] 9. Sharp-Baker H, Chen RH. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:1239–1250. [PubMed] 10. Lengauer C, Wang Z. From spindle checkpoint to cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1144–1145. [PubMed] 11. Baker DJ, Chen J, van Deursen JM. The mitotic checkpoint in cancer and aging: what have mice taught us? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:583–589. [PubMed] 12. Li R, Murray AW. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991;66:519–531. [PubMed] 13. Hong FD, Chen J, Donovan S, Schneider N, Nisen PD. Taxol, vincristine or nocodazole induces lethality in G1-checkpoint-defective human astrocytoma U373MG cells by triggering hyperploid progression. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1161–1168. [PubMed] 14. Weiss E, Winey M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol. 1996;132:111–123. [PubMed] 15. Zachariae W, Nasmyth K. Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2039–2058. [PubMed] 16. Yu H, Tang Z. Bub1 multitasking in mitosis. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:262–265. [PubMed] 17. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J Cell Biol. 2001;154:925–936. [PubMed] 18. Yu H. Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002;14:706–714. [PubMed] 19. Tang Z, Shu H, Oncel D, Chen S, Yu H. Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 provides a catalytic mechanism for APC/C inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Mol Cell. 2004;16:387–397. [PubMed] 20. Kitagawa R, Law E, Tang L, Rose AM. The Cdc20 homolog, FZY-1, and its interacting protein, IFY-1, are required for proper chromosome segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2002;12:2118–2123. [PubMed] 21. Hajeri VA, Stewart AM, Moore LL, Padilla PA. Genetic analysis of the spindle checkpoint genes san-1, mdf-2, bub-3 and the CENP-F homologues hcp-1 and hcp-2 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Div. 2008;3:6. [PubMed] 22. Oegema K, Desai A, Rybina S, Kirkham M, Hyman AA. Functional analysis of kinetochore assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:1209–1226. [PubMed] 23. Encalada SE, Willis J, Lyczak R, Bowerman B. A spindle checkpoint functions during mitosis in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1056–1070. [PubMed] 24. Stein KK, Davis ES, Hays T, Golden A. Components of the spindle assembly checkpoint regulate the anaphase-promoting complex during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2007;175:107–123. [PubMed] 25. O'Connell KF, Leys CM, White JG. A genetic screen for temperature-sensitive cell-division mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1998;149:1303–1321. [PubMed] 26. Woollard A, Hodgkin J. Stu-7/air-2 is a C. elegans aurora homologue essential for chromosome segregation during embryonic and post-embryonic development. Mech Dev. 1999;82:95–108. [PubMed] 27. Furuta T, Baillie DL, Schumacher JM. Caenorhabditis elegans Aurora A kinase AIR-1 is required for postembryonic cell divisions and germline development. Genesis. 2002;34:244–250. [PubMed] 28. Eastman C, Horvitz HR, Jin Y. Coordinated transcriptional regulation of the unc-25 glutamic acid decarboxylase and the unc-47 GABA vesicular transporter by the Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-30 homeodomain protein. J Neurosci. 1999;19:6225–6234. [PubMed] 29. Wang X, Suh C, Zhu Z, Fan Q. Minichromosome maintenance protein 5 homologue in Caenorhabditis elegans plays essential role for postembryonic development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;359:965–971. [PubMed] 30. White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. The structure of the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976;275:327–348. [PubMed] 31. Altun-Gultekin Z, Andachi Y, Tsalik EL, Pilgrim D, Kohara Y, et al. A regulatory cascade of three homeobox genes, ceh-10, ttx-3 and ceh-23, controls cell fate specification of a defined interneuron class in C. elegans. Development. 2001;128:1951–1969. [PubMed] 32. Wicks SR, Yeh RT, Gish WR, Waterston RH, Plasterk RH. Rapid gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans using a high density polymorphism map. Nat Genet. 2001;28:160–164. [PubMed] 33. Hallam S, Singer E, Waring D, Jin Y. The C. elegans NeuroD homolog cnd-1 functions in multiple aspects of motor neuron fate specification. Development. 2000;127:4239–4252. [PubMed] 34. Basu J, Bousbaa H, Logarinho E, Li Z, Williams BC, et al. Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:13–28. [PubMed] 35. Niikura Y, Dixit A, Scott R, Perkins G, Kitagawa K. BUB1 mediation of caspase-independent mitotic death determines cell fate. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:283–296. [PubMed] 36. Yuan J, Shaham S, Ledoux S, Ellis HM, Horvitz HR. The C. elegans cell death gene ced-3 encodes a protein similar to mammalian interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme. Cell. 1993;75:641–652. [PubMed] 37. Kennedy S, Wang D, Ruvkun G. A conserved siRNA-degrading RNase negatively regulates RNA interference in C. elegans. Nature. 2004;427:645–649. [PubMed] 39. Hedgecock EM, White JG. Polyploid tissues in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1985;107:128–133. [PubMed] 40. Pellis-van Berkel W, Verheijen MH, Cuppen E, Asahina M, de Rooij J, et al. Requirement of the Caenorhabditis elegans RapGEF pxf-1 and rap-1 for epithelial integrity. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:106–116. [PubMed] 41. Ambros V, Horvitz HR. Heterochronic mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1984;226:409–416. [PubMed] 42. Kostic I, Li S, Roy R. cki-1 links cell division and cell fate acquisition in the C. elegans somatic gonad. Dev Biol. 2003;263:242–252. [PubMed] 43. Furuta T, Tuck S, Kirchner J, Koch B, Auty R, et al. EMB-30: an APC4 homologue required for metaphase-to-anaphase transitions during meiosis and mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:1401–1419. [PubMed] 44. Tarailo M, Kitagawa R, Rose AM. Suppressors of spindle checkpoint defect (such) mutants identify new mdf-1/MAD1 interactors in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2007;175:1665–1679. [PubMed] 45. Kramer ER, Scheuringer N, Podtelejnikov AV, Mann M, Peters JM. Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:1555–1569. [PubMed] 46. Brodigan TM, Liu J, Park M, Kipreos ET, Krause M. Cyclin E expression during development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 2003;254:102–115. [PubMed] 47. Fay DS, Han M. Mutations in cye-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans cyclin E homolog, reveal coordination between cell-cycle control and vulval development. Development. 2000;127:4049–4060. [PubMed] 48. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. [PubMed] 49. McIntire SL, Reimer RJ, Schuske K, Edwards RH, Jorgensen EM. Identification and characterization of the vesicular GABA transporter. Nature. 1997;389:870–876. [PubMed] 50. Kostic I, Roy R. Organ-specific cell division abnormalities caused by mutation in a general cell cycle regulator in C. elegans. Development. 2002;129:2155–2165. [PubMed] 51. Pilon M, Peng XR, Spence AM, Plasterk RH, Dosch HM. The diabetes autoantigen ICA69 and its Caenorhabditis elegans homologue, ric-19, are conserved regulators of neuroendocrine secretion. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:3277–3288. [PubMed] 52. Sulston J, Hodgkin J. Methods. In: Wood WB, editor. The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1988. pp. 587–606. 53. Hobert O. PCR fusion-based approach to create reporter gene constructs for expression analysis in transgenic C. elegans. Biotechniques. 2002;32:728–730. [PubMed] 54. Maduro M, Pilgrim D. Identification and cloning of unc-119, a gene expressed in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Genetics. 1995;141:977–988. [PubMed] 55. Miller DM, Shakes DC. Immunofluorescence microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 1995;48:365–394. [PubMed] 56. Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Zipperlen P, Martinez-Campos M, Sohrmann M, et al. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature. 2000;408:325–330. [PubMed] 57. Boxem M, Srinivasan DG, van den Heuvel S. The Caenorhabditis elegans gene ncc-1 encodes a cdc2-related kinase required for M phase in meiotic and mitotic cell divisions, but not for S phase. Development. 1999;126:2227–2239. [PubMed] 58. Lozano E, Saez AG, Flemming AJ, Cunha A, Leroi AM. Regulation of growth by ploidy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2006;16:493–498. [PubMed]
|
