![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved. Probiotic Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. cremoris and Streptococcus thermophilus induce IL-12 and IFN-γ production Riina A Kekkonen, Riitta Korpela, University of Helsinki, Institute of Biomedicine, Pharmacology, PO Box 63, Helsinki 00014, Finland Riina A Kekkonen, Riitta Korpela, Valio Ltd, Research Centre, Meijeritie 4, 00370 Helsinki, Finland Riina A Kekkonen, Elina Kajasto, Minja Miettinen, Ville Veckman, Ilkka Julkunen, National Public Health Institute, Department of Viral Diseases and Immunology, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki 00300, Finland Riitta Korpela, Foundation for Nutrition Research, PO Box 30, Valio 00039, Finland Author contributions: Kekkonen R, Kajasto E, Miettinen M, Korpela R and Julkunen I designed research; Kekkonen R, Kajasto E, Miettinen M and Veckman V performed the experiments; Kekkonen R and Kajasto E analysed data; Kekkonen R, Miettinen M, Korpela R and Julkunen I wrote the paper. Correspondence to: Riina Kekkonen, Valio Research Centre, Meijeritie 4, Helsinki 00370, Finland. riina.kekkonen/at/valio.fi Telephone: +358-50-3842571 Fax: +358-10-3813019 Received September 21, 2007; Revised December 11, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract AIM: To investigate the capacity of potentially probiotic strains from six bacterial genera to induce cytokine production alone or in combinations in order to identify potential enhancing or synergistic effects in order to select probiotic bacteria for in vivo purposes. METHODS: Cytokine production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in response to stimulation with eleven different potentially probiotic bacterial strains from Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc and Propionibacterium genera was analysed. Production and mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-12, IFN-γ and IL-10 were determined by ELISA and Northern blotting, respectively. RESULTS: All tested bacteria induced TNF-α production. The best inducers of Th1 type cytokines IL-12 and IFN-γ were Streptococcus and Leuconostoc strains. All Bifidobacterium and Propionibacterium strains induced higher IL-10 production than other studied bacteria. Stimulation of PBMC with any bacterial combinations did not result in enhanced cytokine production suggesting that different bacteria whether gram-positive or gram-negative compete with each other during host cell interactions. CONCLUSION: The probiotic S. thermophilus and Leuconostoc strains are more potent inducers of Th1 type cytokines IL-12 and IFN-γ than the probiotic Lactobacillus strains. Bacterial combinations did not result in enhanced cytokine production. Keywords: Probiotics, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Propionibacterium, Immune response, Cytokines, Mononuclear cells INTRODUCTION Probiotics are defined as living microorganisms that have beneficial effects on human health[1]. Documented health effects in human intervention trials include amelioration of acute diarrhoea in children, reduction of the risk of antibiotic-associated gastrointestinal symptoms, relief of milk allergy/atopic dermatitis in infants, reduction in the risk of atopic diseases and respiratory infections, relief of irritable bowel syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis symptoms, suppression of H pylori and modulation of the immune response[2–4]. The ways in which probiotic bacteria affect the human immune system in vivo and in vitro are not fully understood. The immunomodulatory effects of probiotic bacteria could be due to the produced cytokines that further regulate innate and adaptive immune responses. Different leukocyte types cooperate during the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. In addition to direct cellular contacts the communication between immune cells depends on secreted mediators including cytokines. Bacteria-induced stress produces inflammatory cytokines promoting the activation of antimicrobial immune responses. TNF-α is a potent inducer of many inflammatory molecules including other cytokines[5]. IL-12 produced by activated antigen-presenting cells (APC) enhances the development of Th1 type immune responses and stimulates NK and T cell IFN-γ production. All this further enhances cell-mediated Th1 type responses[6]. IL-10 downregulates the inflammatory response and induces an antibody-mediated immune response[7]. In previous studies it has been shown that individual probiotic bacteria can induce the production of TNF-α[8–10], IL-12[11–15], IFN-γ[10,11,13,15] and IL-10[9,15–18] in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in vitro. At present only a limited amount of comparative data is available on the ability of different probiotic strains to induce cytokine production within the same experimental system[9,14–17]. Also, the effect of probiotic bacterial combinations on cytokine production in vitro is not well documented. Understanding of the cytokine patterns that probiotics elicit may help in designing probiotics for specific preventative or therapeutic purposes. Information on the cytokine production induced by different probiotic bacteria and their combinations would enable development and optimal clinical use of these microbes as health promoting substances. In the present study human PBMCs consisting of monocytes, T and B lymphocytes and NK cells, are used for in vitro screening for cytokine production. Cytokine production in response to stimulation with different potentially probiotic strains from six bacterial genera Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc and Propionibacterium alone or in combinations is analysed in order to identify potential enhancing or synergistic effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains Streptococcus pyogenes serotype T1M1 (IH32030) and Escherichia coli (DH5α) were obtained from the collection of National Public Health Institute (Helsinki, Finland). Eleven potentially probiotic strains; Streptococcus thermophilus THS, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103), Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lc705 (DSM 7061), Lactobacillus helveticus 1129, Lactobacillus helveticus Lb 161, Bifidobacterium longum 1/10, Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis Bb12, Bifidobacterium breve Bb99 (DSM 13692), Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris ARH74 (DSM 18891), Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. cremoris PIA2 (DSM 18892) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS (DSM 7067), were obtained from Valio Research Centre (Helsinki, Finland). Bacteria were stored in skimmed milk at -70°C and passaged three times (except Bifibobacterium strains which were passaged four times) before they were used in stimulation experiments. S. pyogenes was grown at 37°C under aerobic conditions in sheep blood agar (Oxoid, Ogdensburg, NY, USA) and tryptone-yeast broth supplemented with 2 g/L glucose[19], E. coli at 37°C under aerobic conditions in Luria-medium (National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland), Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains were grown at 37°C under aerobic conditions in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium (Lab M, Topley House, Lancashire, UK), Lactobacillus helveticus strains were grown at 42°C under aerobic conditions in MRS medium (Lab M, Topley House), L. mesenteroides was grown at 22°C under aerobic conditions in MRS medium (Lab M, Topley House), Bifidobacterium strains at 37°C under anaerobic conditions in MRS medium (Lab M, Topley House) with 5 g/L cysteine (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), S. thermophilus at 37°C under aerobic conditions in M17-agar (Lab M, Topley House) with 20 g/L lactose (J.T. Baker B.V., Deventer, Holland) and M17-broth (Difco, Beckton Dickinson, MD, USA) with 20 g/L lactose (J.T. Baker B.V.), P. freudenreichii at 30°C under aerobic conditions in propioni-medium (Valio Ltd, Helsinki, Finland), L. lactis at 22°C under aerobic conditions in calcium citrate agar (Valio Ltd) and M17-broth (Difco) with 20 g/L lactose (J.T. Baker B.V.). For stimulation experiments bacteria were grown to logarithmic growth phase, and the number of bacteria was determined by counting in a Petroff-Hauser counting chamber. Cell culture Human PBMC were purified by density gradient centrifugation over a Ficoll-Paque gradient (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) from freshly collected, leukocyte-rich buffy coats obtained from healthy blood donors (Finnish Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service, Helsinki, Finland)[20]. After washing, the cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Integro, Zaandam, Holland) and supplemented with 2 mmol/L L-glutamine (Sigma), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Gibco BRL, Paisley, Scotland). In stimulation experiments purified leukocytes (2 × 109 cells/mL) were incubated with bacteria in a final volume of 1 mL in 24-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Stimulation experiments All experiments were performed with cells obtained from four different blood donors. During bacterial stimulations PBMCs were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium containing 100 mL/L FCS. Bacteria were added into the cell culture to obtain the required bacteria: host cell ratio. S. pyogenes was used as a positive control and RPMI 1640 containing 100 mL/L FCS as a negative control. Bacterial doses and incubation times are as indicated for each experiment. When PBMC were stimulated with a combination of two bacteria or more, equal numbers of different bacteria were used, and the sum bacterial dose of the combinations was 10:1 of a bacteria: host cell ratio. Cell culture supernatants were collected from individual donor cell cultures and stored at -20°C before analysis. For RNA analysis cells from different donors were pooled. Cytokine specific ELISA Cell culture supernatants obtained from individual donors were analyzed for cytokine levels by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) essentially as previously described[8]. TNF-α and IL-10 were determined with antibody pairs and standards obtained from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA). IFN-γ and IL-12p70 were determined with Eli-pair kits (BioSite, Täby, Sweden). RNA isolation and Northern blotting For isolation of total cellular RNA, stimulated cells from different donors were pooled, collected, washed with PBS, and lysed in guanidinium isothiocyanate[21], followed by a centrifugation through a CsCl cushion as previously described[22]. RNA was quantified photometrically and samples containing equal amounts (10 μg) of total cellular RNA were size-fractioned on 1% formaldehyde-agarose gels, transferred to Hybond-N nylon membranes (Amersham-Pharmacia-Biotech) and hybridized. To control equal loading, ethidium bromide staining was used. The cDNA probes were human TNF-α (ATCC), IL-12 p40 and p35[23], IFN-γ[24] and IL-10 (DNAX, Palo Alto, USA). Hybridizations were performed in a solution containing 500 g/L formamide, 5 × Denhardt’s solution, 5 × SSPE and 5 g/L SDS at 42°C. After hybridization membranes were washed three times with 1 × saline sodium citrate/g per L SDS at 42°C for 30 min and once at 65°C for 30 min. Membranes were exposed to Kodak X-Omat AR films (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) at -70°C with intensifying screens. RESULTS Bacterial dose-dependent induction of cytokine production in human PBMC To determine the optimal bacterial dose that can induce cytokine production in human PBMC, cells were stimulated with different doses of live probiotic bacteria (2:1, 10:1 and 50:1 bacteria: cell ratio). Cell culture supernatants were collected at 24 h after stimulation and cytokine levels were determined by ELISA. As shown in Figure Figure11
Kinetics of cytokine production in probiotic bacteria-stimulated PBMC Next the kinetics of cytokine production in PBMC using a 10:1 bacterium: host cell ratio was analysed by ELISA. All probiotic bacteria induced TNF-α production by 6 h after stimulation (Figure (Figure2).2 Probiotic bacteria-induced cytokine mRNA expression Those bacteria that were the best inducers of cytokines at the protein level (namely S. thermophilus, B. breve, L. mesenteroides and P. freudenreichii) were selected for more detailed analysis of cytokine mRNA expression as analyzed by Northern blotting. In addition to our positive control S. pyogenes, also L. rhamnosus GG that has been extensively studied in vitro by our group and in many clinical trials[2,3] was added for the analysis. Consistent with the kinetics of TNF-α protein production, mRNA expression was fast and detectable at 3 h after bacterial stimulation (Figure (Figure3).3
Combination effect of probiotic bacteria on cytokine production in human PBMC The probiotic bacteria and their combinations which have been used in clinical trials, namely L. rhamnosus strains, P. freudenreichii and B. breve[25–28], L. rhamnosus strains, P. freudenreichii, and B. animalis[29,30] and L. rhamnosus strains and P. freudenreichii[31], were used to study whether the effect of probiotic combinations differs from an individual strain. All probiotic combinations induced TNF-α production at the same or lower level as compared to those responses induced by probiotic bacteria alone (Figure (Figure4).4 Effect of probiotic bacteria together with E. coli on cytokine production in human PBMC All studied probiotic bacteria are gram-positive and thus likely to use Toll-like receptor (TLR)2-mediated signal transduction pathways in host cells while a gram-negative bacterium E. coli uses TLR4[32]. We did not observe any additive effects on cytokine production induced by the combinations of our gram-positive probiotic bacteria (Figure (Figure5).5
DISCUSSION In this study we have systematically analysed the ability of potentially probiotic bacterial strains from six different genera; Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc and Propionibacterium, to induce cytokine expression in vitro in human PBMC. We show that eleven probiotic strains induce cytokine expression differently and the expression pattern seems to be dependent on the bacterial genera. In addition, stimulation of PBMC with any bacterial combinations, whether gram-positive or gram-negative, does not lead to enhanced cytokine production. Also we report for the first time that novel probiotic S. thermophilus and Leuconostoc strains are more potent inducers of Th1 type cytokines IL-12 and IFN-γ than the probiotic Lactobacillus strains presently in clinical use. Human PBMC offer a model for studying the potential of different probiotic strains to induce cytokine production. In vivo, probiotics are not in direct contact with PBMC. Instead, probiotics interact with the epithelial cells of the gut, and probiotics may be taken up by macrophages, dendritic cells or M-cells at Peyer’s patches and this can lead to the activation of lymphocytes such as monocytes residing in Peyer’s patches[33]. Since PBMC are a source for monocytes among other immune cells, they provide an adequate model to study the immunological properties of probiotic bacteria. Therefore, in vitro bacteria-host cell studies aid in selecting novel probiotic strains for clinical trials. Our data is consistent with previous studies showing that probiotic bacteria are able to induce TNF-α secretion in human PBMC[8,10,11,17]. However, there were considerable differences in the ability of different probiotic bacteria to induce IL-12 and IFN-γ. Interestingly, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains which have previously been shown to stimulate IL-12 and IFN-γ production in human PBMC[11–14,17], were in the present study found to be relatively poor inducers of these cytokines. Instead, we found that novel probiotic S. thermophilus and Leuconostoc strains were extremely good inducers of these Th1 type cytokines. One of the approaches in treating allergy could be tipping the Th1/Th2 balance from Th2 predominance to Th1 type response. In clinical trials L. rhamnosus GG[27,34,35] or a combination of two different L. rhamnosus strains, Bifidobacterium and Propionibacterium[28] have been used successfully to prevent atopic diseases. A strong Th1 type cytokine response is also an important factor in the fight against viral infections such as that caused by influenza A virus. Indeed, Lactobacillus strains have been shown to prevent and ameliorate the symptoms of respiratory infections[36–40]. It is of interest that for example L. rhamnosus GG has been effective in immune mediated diseases even though in the present study we observed that LGG induced very low cytokine production. This may be due to the fact that cytokine induction is only one of the proposed mechanisms of action for probiotics. Other as important factors may for example be the ability to adhere to the gut epithelium and the promotion of non-immunological gut defence barrier by normalizing permeability and disturbed gut microecology. Since S. thermophilus and Leuconostoc strains used in the present study were extremely potent inducers of IL-12 and IFN-γ, these strains may show better clinical efficiency in enhancing Th1 response in allergy and in the prevention of respiratory infections than the presently used probiotic Lactobacillus strains. IL-10 was induced by Bifidobacterium and Propionibacterium strains, whereas IL-10 production induced by Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus and Leuconostoc strains remained at a low level. Our data is consistent with previous studies in which bifidobacteria were shown to induce higher IL-10 production as compared to lactobacilli[9,16]. The anti-inflammatory actions of IL-10 could be helpful in the treatment of inflammatory conditions or diseases. There is preliminary evidence that probiotics could be used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases like ulcerative colitis, pouchitis and rheumatoid arthritis[2,41]. The amelioration of these inflammatory diseases could be due to the induction of IL-10. Recent studies indicate a possible role of low-grade mucosal inflammation also in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome[42,43]. Preliminary evidence exists that a combination of probiotics, which included anti-inflammatory Bifidobacterium and Propionibacterium strains in addition to two different L. rhamnosus strains, relieves the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome[25]. Bifidobacterium and Propionibacterium which in this study were able to induce anti-inflammatory IL-10 production could thus be used to treat different types of inflammatory diseases. The use of probiotic bacterial combinations in clinical trials has shown great promise making it important to understand the immunological properties of a single strain versus different bacterial combinations. However, there is only limited amount of comparative data on the immunomodulatory properties of several different probiotic bacterial strains within the same experimental system. Published data is mainly limited to the analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genera[9,11–13,44]. In the present study combinations of different gram-positive probiotic bacteria did not induce any additive or synergistic cytokine production in PBMCs. This could be due to the fact that all gram-positive bacteria are likely to use the same or similar intracellular signal transduction mechanisms to induce cytokine gene expression. Interestingly, no additive or synergistic induction of cytokine production was seen even when gram-positive probiotic bacterial strains were combined with a gram-negative bacteria, E. coli. On the contrary, E. coli-induced IFN-γ production was reduced when different probiotics were present during the stimulation experiments. Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria have been shown to induce quite different cytokine production patterns. In human PBMCs gram-positive bacteria induce TNF-α[8–10], IL-12[11–15] and IFN-γ[10,11,13,15] while gram-negative bacteria have preferentially been suggested to induce IL-10 production[14]. Gram-positive bacteria or their structural components activate cells via TLR2, whereas gram-negative bacteria and their major structural component lipopolysaccharide activate host cell via TLR4[32]. It is, however, likely that other receptor systems apart from TLRs take part in host cell responses to different microbes[45]. Our data suggests that different bacteria whether they are gram-positive or gram-negative compete with each other during bacteria-host cell interactions. Therefore, combining gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria to activate the respective TLR2 and TLR4-dependent signalling pathways does not further enhance human PBMC responses. Initial analyses with TLR2 and TLR4 ligand combinations also fail to demonstrate any synergistic enhancement in cytokine production (data not shown). Our results suggest that probiotic bacteria in a genera-specific way direct immune responses to either the Th1 type or the anti-inflammatory side. Besides providing possible explanations for phenomena observed in clinical trials, this finding might enable pinning down the probiotic bacterial (genera) specific factors contributing to the type of immune response elicited. Understanding of the immunological properties of probiotic bacteria is needed in the development of probiotic bacteria for targeted treatment of different disease conditions. COMMENTS Background and research frontiers Probiotic bacteria have been used for the prevention and treatment of a diverse range of disorders. However, the ways in which probiotic bacteria elicit their health effects are not fully understood. One of the action mechanisms could be the ability to induce cytokines that further regulate innate and adaptive immune responses. Innovations and breakthroughs At present there is only a limited amount of comparative data available on the ability of different probiotic strains to induce cytokine responses within the same experimental system. Also, the effect of probiotic bacterial combinations on cytokine production in vitro is not well documented although bacterial combinations have been used in many clinical trials. In the present study we have analysed the cytokine production of eleven different potentially probiotic strains from six bacterial genera alone or in combinations in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in order to indentify potential enhancing or synergistic effects. Applications We found that probiotic bacteria direct immune responses to either Th1 type or anti-inflammatory way in a bacterial genera-specific manner. The probiotic S. thermophilus and Leuconostoc strains are more potent inducers of Th1 type cytokines IL-12 and IFN-γ than the probiotic Lactobacillus strains. Bacterial combinations did not result in enhanced cytokine production. More detailed information on the cytokine patterns that probiotic bacteria elicit may help in designing probiotics for specific preventative or therapeutic purposes. Terminology Probiotic bacteria are defined as living microorganisms that have beneficial effects on human health. Peer review This paper explores a mechanism of action of probiotics, namely the induction of cytokines by different strains of probiotics. The authors have designed a clear, logical study of different strains, dose-response, time of response and interactions of different probiotic strains. The paper includes an excellent exploration of probiotic mixtures. Acknowledgments Professor Heikki Vapaatalo is greatly appreciated for his critical comments on the manuscript, Hannu Kautiainen, BA for helping to create the figures, and Juha Laukonmaa and Tuula Vähäsöyrinki for their technical assistance in the growth of the bacteria. Footnotes Supported by The Research Council for Health of the Academy of Finland, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation and Valio Research Centre Peer reviewer: Dr. Lynne V McFarland, Puget Sound VA,
HSR&D, 1100 Olive Street, Suite #1400, Seattle, Washington,
WA 98101, United States S- Editor Ma L L- Editor Alpini GD E- Editor Lu W References 1. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. World Health Organization, London Ontario, Canada. 2002. FAO/WHO; p. 8. Available from: ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/wgreport2.pdf. 2. Saxelin M, Tynkkynen S, Mattila-Sandholm T, de Vos WM. Probiotic and other functional microbes: from markets to mechanisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005;16:204–211. [PubMed] 3. Vaarala O. Immunological effects of probiotics with special reference to lactobacilli. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33:1634–1640. [PubMed] 4. Ezendam J, van Loveren H. Probiotics: immunomodulation and evaluation of safety and efficacy. Nutr Rev. 2006;64:1–14. [PubMed] 5. Hehlgans T, Pfeffer K. The intriguing biology of the tumour necrosis factor/tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily: players, rules and the games. Immunology. 2005;115:1–20. [PubMed] 6. Szabo SJ, Sullivan BM, Peng SL, Glimcher LH. Molecular mechanisms regulating Th1 immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:713–758. [PubMed] 7. Taylor A, Verhagen J, Blaser K, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Mechanisms of immune suppression by interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-beta: the role of T regulatory cells. Immunology. 2006;117:433–442. [PubMed] 8. Miettinen M, Vuopio-Varkila J, Varkila K. Production of human tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 is induced by lactic acid bacteria. Infect Immun. 1996;64:5403–5405. [PubMed] 9. Helwig U, Lammers KM, Rizzello F, Brigidi P, Rohleder V, Caramelli E, Gionchetti P, Schrezenmeir J, Foelsch UR, Schreiber S, et al. Lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and E. coli nissle induce pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:5978–5986. [PubMed] 10. Shida K, Suzuki T, Kiyoshima-Shibata J, Shimada S, Nanno M. Essential roles of monocytes in stimulating human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with Lactobacillus casei to produce cytokines and augment natural killer cell activity. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13:997–1003. [PubMed] 11. Miettinen M, Matikainen S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Pirhonen J, Varkila K, Kurimoto M, Julkunen I. Lactobacilli and streptococci induce interleukin-12 (IL-12), IL-18, and gamma interferon production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infect Immun. 1998;66:6058–6062. [PubMed] 12. Hessle C, Hanson LA, Wold AE. Lactobacilli from human gastrointestinal mucosa are strong stimulators of IL-12 production. Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;116:276–282. [PubMed] 13. Haller D, Blum S, Bode C, Hammes WP, Schiffrin EJ. Activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by nonpathogenic bacteria in vitro: evidence of NK cells as primary targets. Infect Immun. 2000;68:752–759. [PubMed] 14. Hessle C, Andersson B, Wold AE. Gram-positive bacteria are potent inducers of monocytic interleukin-12 (IL-12) while gram-negative bacteria preferentially stimulate IL-10 production. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3581–3586. [PubMed] 15. Foligne B, Nutten S, Grangette C, Dennin V, Goudercourt D, Poiret S, Dewulf J, Brassart D, Mercenier A, Pot B. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory properties of lactic acid bacteria. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:236–243. [PubMed] 16. Lammers KM, Brigidi P, Vitali B, Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Caramelli E, Matteuzzi D, Campieri M. Immunomodulatory effects of probiotic bacteria DNA: IL-1 and IL-10 response in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:165–172. [PubMed] 17. Niers LE, Timmerman HM, Rijkers GT, van Bleek GM, van Uden NO, Knol EF, Kapsenberg ML, Kimpen JL, Hoekstra MO. Identification of strong interleukin-10 inducing lactic acid bacteria which down-regulate T helper type 2 cytokines. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35:1481–1489. [PubMed] 18. Drouault-Holowacz S, Foligne B, Dennin V, Goudercourt D, Terpend K, Burckel A, Pot B. Anti-inflammatory potential of the probiotic dietary supplement Lactibiane Tolerance: in vitro and in vivo considerations. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:994–1003. [PubMed] 19. Holm SE, Falsen E. An antigen free medium for cultivation of beta-hemolytic streptococci. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1967;69:264–267. 20. Pirhonen J, Sareneva T, Kurimoto M, Julkunen I, Matikainen S. Virus infection activates IL-1 beta and IL-18 production in human macrophages by a caspase-1-dependent pathway. J Immunol. 1999;162:7322–7329. [PubMed] 21. Chirgwin JM, Przybyla AE, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry. 1979;18:5294–5299. [PubMed] 22. Glisin V, Crkvenjakov R, Byus C. Ribonucleic acid isolated by cesium chloride centrifugation. Biochemistry. 1974;13:2633–2637. [PubMed] 23. Gubler U, Chua AO, Schoenhaut DS, Dwyer CM, McComas W, Motyka R, Nabavi N, Wolitzky AG, Quinn PM, Familletti PC. Coexpression of two distinct genes is required to generate secreted bioactive cytotoxic lymphocyte maturation factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:4143–4147. [PubMed] 24. Sareneva T, Pirhonen J, Cantell K, Kalkkinen N, Julkunen I. Role of N-glycosylation in the synthesis, dimerization and secretion of human interferon-gamma. Biochem J. 1994;303(Pt 3):831–840. [PubMed] 25. Kajander K, Hatakka K, Poussa T, Farkkila M, Korpela R. A probiotic mixture alleviates symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients: a controlled 6-month intervention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:387–394. [PubMed] 26. Myllyluoma E, Veijola L, Ahlroos T, Tynkkynen S, Kankuri E, Vapaatalo H, Rautelin H, Korpela R. Probiotic supplementation improves tolerance to Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy--a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:1263–1272. [PubMed] 27. Viljanen M, Savilahti E, Haahtela T, Juntunen-Backman K, Korpela R, Poussa T, Tuure T, Kuitunen M. Probiotics in the treatment of atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome in infants: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Allergy. 2005;60:494–500. [PubMed] 28. Kukkonen K, Savilahti E, Haahtela T, Juntunen-Backman K, Korpela R, Poussa T, Tuure T, Kuitunen M. Probiotics and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides in the prevention of allergic diseases: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:192–198. [PubMed] 29. Kajander K, Myllyluoma E, Rajilic-Stojanovic M, Kyronpalo S, Rasmussen M, Jarvenpaa S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Vapaatalo H, Korpela R. Clinical trial: multispecies probiotic supplementation alleviates the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and stabilizes intestinal microbiota. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:48–57. [PubMed] 30. Myllyluoma E, Kajander K, Mikkola H, Kyronpalo S, Rasmussen M, Kankuri E, Sipponen P, Vapaatalo H, Korpela R. Probiotic intervention decreases serum gastrin-17 in Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:516–523. [PubMed] 31. Hatakka K, Ahola AJ, Yli-Knuuttila H, Richardson M, Poussa T, Meurman JH, Korpela R. Probiotics reduce the prevalence of oral candida in the elderly--a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2007;86:125–130. [PubMed] 32. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006;124:783–801. [PubMed] 33. McCracken VJ, Lorenz RG. The gastrointestinal ecosystem: a precarious alliance among epithelium, immunity and microbiota. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3:1–11. [PubMed] 34. Isolauri E, Arvola T, Sutas Y, Moilanen E, Salminen S. Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:1604–1610. [PubMed] 35. Kalliomaki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Koskinen P, Isolauri E. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357:1076–1079. [PubMed] 36. Hatakka K, Savilahti E, Pönkä A, Meurman JH, Poussa T, Näse L, Saxelin M, Korpela R. Effect of long term consumption of probiotic milk on infections in children attending day care centres: double blind, randomised trial. BMJ. 2001;322:1–5. [PubMed] 37. de Vrese M, Winkler P, Rautenberg P, Harder T, Noah C, Laue C, Ott S, Hampe J, Schreiber S, Heller K, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri PA 16/8, Bifidobacterium longum SP 07/3, B. bifidum MF 20/5 on common cold episodes: a double blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:481–491. [PubMed] 38. Winkler P, de Vrese M, Laue Ch, Schrezenmeir J. Effect of a dietary supplement containing probiotic bacteria plus vitamins and minerals on common cold infections and cellular immune parameters. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;43:318–326. [PubMed] 39. Turchet P, Laurenzano M, Auboiron S, Antoine JM. Effect of fermented milk containing the probiotic Lactobacillus casei DN-114001 on winter infections in free-living elderly subjects: a randomised, controlled pilot study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2003;7:75–77. [PubMed] 40. Tubelius P, Stan V, Zachrisson A. Increasing work-place healthiness with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Environ Health. 2005;4:25. [PubMed] 41. Jones JL, Foxx-Orenstein AE. The role of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:607–611. [PubMed] 42. Chadwick VS, Chen W, Shu D, Paulus B, Bethwaite P, Tie A, Wilson I. Activation of the mucosal immune system in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1778–1783. [PubMed] 43. O'Mahony L, McCarthy J, Kelly P, Hurley G, Luo F, Chen K, O'Sullivan GC, Kiely B, Collins JK, Shanahan F, et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:541–551. [PubMed] 44. O'Mahony L, O'Callaghan L, McCarthy J, Shilling D, Scully P, Sibartie S, Kavanagh E, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP, Collins JK, et al. Differential cytokine response from dendritic cells to commensal and pathogenic bacteria in different lymphoid compartments in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G839–G845. [PubMed] 45. Robinson MJ, Sancho D, Slack EC, LeibundGut-Landmann S, Reis e Sousa C. Myeloid C-type lectins in innate immunity. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1258–1265. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Apr; 16(2):204-11.
[Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005]Nutr Rev. 2006 Jan; 64(1):1-14.
[Nutr Rev. 2006]Immunology. 2005 May; 115(1):1-20.
[Immunology. 2005]Annu Rev Immunol. 2003; 21():713-58.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2003]Immunology. 2006 Apr; 117(4):433-42.
[Immunology. 2006]Infect Immun. 1996 Dec; 64(12):5403-5.
[Infect Immun. 1996]Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006 Sep; 13(9):997-1003.
[Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 1999 Jun 15; 162(12):7322-9.
[J Immunol. 1999]Infect Immun. 1996 Dec; 64(12):5403-5.
[Infect Immun. 1996]Biochemistry. 1979 Nov 27; 18(24):5294-9.
[Biochemistry. 1979]Biochemistry. 1974 Jun 4; 13(12):2633-7.
[Biochemistry. 1974]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 15; 88(10):4143-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]Biochem J. 1994 Nov 1; 303 ( Pt 3)():831-40.
[Biochem J. 1994]Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Apr; 16(2):204-11.
[Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005]Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Dec; 33(12):1634-40.
[Clin Exp Allergy. 2003]Infect Immun. 1998 Dec; 66(12):6058-62.
[Infect Immun. 1998]Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Sep 1; 22(5):387-94.
[Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005]J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jan; 119(1):192-8.
[J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007]Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jan 1; 27(1):48-57.
[Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008]Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Jun; 39(6):516-23.
[Dig Liver Dis. 2007]J Dent Res. 2007 Feb; 86(2):125-30.
[J Dent Res. 2007]Cell. 2006 Feb 24; 124(4):783-801.
[Cell. 2006]Cell Microbiol. 2001 Jan; 3(1):1-11.
[Cell Microbiol. 2001]Infect Immun. 1996 Dec; 64(12):5403-5.
[Infect Immun. 1996]Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006 Sep; 13(9):997-1003.
[Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006]Infect Immun. 1998 Dec; 66(12):6058-62.
[Infect Immun. 1998]Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Nov; 35(11):1481-9.
[Clin Exp Allergy. 2005]Infect Immun. 2000 Jun; 68(6):3581-6.
[Infect Immun. 2000]World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 7; 12(37):5978-86.
[World J Gastroenterol. 2006]FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003 Sep 22; 38(2):165-72.
[FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003]Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Apr; 16(2):204-11.
[Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005]Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Mar; 52(3):607-11.
[Dig Dis Sci. 2007]Gastroenterology. 2002 Jun; 122(7):1778-83.
[Gastroenterology. 2002]World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 7; 12(37):5978-86.
[World J Gastroenterol. 2006]Infect Immun. 1998 Dec; 66(12):6058-62.
[Infect Immun. 1998]Infect Immun. 2000 Feb; 68(2):752-9.
[Infect Immun. 2000]Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006 Apr; 290(4):G839-45.
[Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006]Infect Immun. 1996 Dec; 64(12):5403-5.
[Infect Immun. 1996]Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006 Sep; 13(9):997-1003.
[Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006]Infect Immun. 1998 Dec; 66(12):6058-62.
[Infect Immun. 1998]World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 14; 13(2):236-43.
[World J Gastroenterol. 2007]Infect Immun. 2000 Feb; 68(2):752-9.
[Infect Immun. 2000]