![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009, American Society of Plant Biologists Auxin-Responsive Genes AIR12 Code for a New Family of Plasma Membrane b-Type Cytochromes Specific to Flowering Plants1[C][W][OA] Laboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Department of Experimental Evolutionary Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy (V.P., N.T., P.P., P.T.); Institut de Biochimie et Biophysique Moléculaire et Cellulaire, UMR 8619 (C.M.), and Institut de Biotechnologie des Plantes, UMR 8618 (S.D.L.), CNRS, Université Paris-Sud 11, Orsay F–91405 cedex, France; and Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche (D.C., M.D.V.) and Dipartimento di Biologia (A.C.), Università di Padova, Padova 35131, Italy *Corresponding author; e-mail valeria.preger/at/unibo.it. 2These authors contributed equally to the article. Received March 31, 2009; Accepted April 15, 2009. Abstract We report here on the identification of the major plasma membrane (PM) ascorbate-reducible b-type cytochrome of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) hypocotyls as orthologs of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) AIR12 (for auxin induced in root cultures). Soybean AIR12, which is glycosylated and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored to the external side of the PM in vivo, was expressed in Pichia pastoris in a recombinant form, lacking the glycosylphosphatidylinositol modification signal and purified from the culture medium. Recombinant AIR12 is a soluble protein predicted to fold into a β-sandwich domain and belonging to the DOMON (for dopamine β-monooxygenase N terminus) domain superfamily. It is shown to be a b-type cytochrome with a symmetrical α-band at 561 nm, fully reduced by ascorbate, and fully oxidized by monodehydroascorbate radical. AIR12 is a high-potential cytochrome b showing a wide bimodal dependence from the redox potential between +80 mV and +300 mV. Optical absorption and electron paramagnetic resonance analysis indicate that AIR12 binds a single, highly axial low-spin heme, likely coordinated by methionine-91 and histidine-76, which are strongly conserved in AIR12 sequences. Phylogenetic analyses reveal that the auxin-responsive genes AIR12 represent a new family of PM b-type cytochromes specific to flowering plants. Circumstantial evidence suggests that AIR12 may interact with other redox partners within the PM to constitute a redox link between cytoplasm and apoplast. Complex interactions between plant cells and the environment are mediated by the apoplast. The apoplastic liquid phase permeating the cell wall contains relatively low concentrations of solutes (Dietz, 1997). Its composition, although largely determined by the protoplast, is easily perturbed by environmental challenges that can thus be perceived by the apoplast and translated into signals that trigger cell responses (Pignocchi and Foyer, 2003; Foyer and Noctor, 2005). Environmental challenges affecting the apoplast commonly result in an oxidative load, caused, for instance, by pollutants (e.g. ozone; Sandermann, 2008) or by endogenously generated reactive oxygen species (ROS). Several enzymatic and nonenzymatic systems are able to generate ROS in the apoplast (Fry, 1998; Apel and Hirt, 2004), an event that is not restricted to biotic or abiotic stresses (Torres and Dangl, 2005), but also involved in diverse physiological conditions, including stomata closure and cell growth (Foreman et al., 2003; Mori and Schroeder, 2004; Gapper and Dolan, 2006; Schopfer and Liszkay, 2006). Apoplastic reductants not only act as an antioxidant barrier, but they could also modulate oxidative signals, thus actively contributing to plant adaptation to the environment. Ascorbate occurs at 10−4 to 10−3 m concentrations in the apoplast, where it represents the major pool of low-molecular-mass antioxidants (Dietz, 1997; Pignocchi and Foyer, 2003; Padu et al., 2005). Maintenance of the apoplastic ascorbate pool depends on transport systems of the plasma membrane (PM; Horemans et al., 2000). The redox state of the ascorbate in the apoplast is relatively flexible and typically more oxidized than in the symplast (Cordoba-Pedregosa et al., 2003, 2005; de Pinto and De Gara, 2004; Padu et al., 2005; Pignocchi et al., 2006). Ascorbate oxidation can be effected enzymatically by ascorbate oxidase or ascorbate peroxidase, and nonenzymatically by direct interaction with ROS (including ozone; Sandermann, 2008), transition metals (e.g. iron, copper; Fry, 1998), or phenolic radicals (Takahama, 1993). Oxidation of ascorbate gives rise to the monodehydroascorbate (MDA) radical, which can disproportionate into ascorbate and fully oxidized dehydroascorbate. In addition, the apoplastic MDA radical can be reduced back to ascorbate by a trans-PM redox system that uses cytosolic ascorbate as a reductant and involves a high-potential cytochrome b (Horemans et al., 1994). The latter has escaped molecular identification thus far (Trost et al., 2000; Bérczi et al., 2003; Griesen et al., 2004; Preger et al., 2005). It was suggested (Asard et al., 2001) that the trans-PM electron transfer from cytosolic ascorbate to apoplastic MDA may be effected by a cytochrome b561, in analogy to the electron transfer of animal chromaffin vesicles (Kelley and Njus, 1986). Cytochromes b561 are high-potential, transmembrane redox proteins of about 25 kD made of six membrane-spanning α-helices, which bind two hemes b. One heme is predicted to be close to an ascorbate binding site facing the cytosol, whereas the second heme faces the opposite side of the membrane and can be oxidized by either MDA or ferrichelates (Tsubaki et al., 1997; McKie et al., 2001; Bérczi et al., 2005; Kamensky et al., 2007). Plants contain several orthologous genes to animal cytochrome b561 (Asard et al., 2000; Bashtovyy et al., 2003). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) contains four genes belonging to this family (Tsubaki et al., 2005) and one of these (At4g25570, CYBASC1), expressed in recombinant form, showed similar biochemical properties to animal cytochrome b561 (Bérczi et al., 2007). However, the localization in vivo of plant cytochrome b561 is controversial. Arabidopsis CYBASC1 was found to be associated with the tonoplast membrane (Griesen et al., 2004) and annotated in proteomic studies as either a tonoplast protein (Carter et al., 2004; Shimaoka et al., 2004) or a chloroplast protein (Zybailov et al., 2008). Tonoplast localization was also reported for bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) CYBASC1 in etiolated hypocotyls (Preger et al., 2005), whereas a GFP construct of CYBASC1 from wild watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) was shown to be targeted to the PM in transformed onion (Allium cepa) epidermal cells (Nanasato et al., 2005). No data are available for any other isoform of cytochrome b561 in plants. An ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b from enriched PM preparations was purified as a glycosylated protein of 55 to 63 kD (bean hypocotyls; Trost et al., 2000) or 120 kD (Arabidopsis; Bérczi et al., 2003) in SDS-PAGE. The association to the PM of the bean hypocotyl cytochrome was confirmed by analytical Suc gradient centrifugation (Preger et al., 2005). Based on potentiometric redox titrations, both bean and Arabidopsis cytochrome b preparations were suggested to bind two hemes with distant redox potentials (Em7 +135 and +180/+200 mV). However, the nature of this high-potential cytochrome b of plant PM remained elusive, although clearly different from tonoplast cytochrome b561 (Preger et al., 2005). In this article, we report on the purification, molecular identification, cloning, and biochemical characterization of the major ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b associated with the PM of soybean (Glycine max) etiolated hypocotyls. The coding gene, known as AIR12 (for auxin induced in root cultures), is early expressed during auxin-induced lateral root formation in Arabidopsis (Laskowski et al., 2006). We demonstrate that AIR12 is a member of a new family of ascorbate-reducible cytochromes b specific to flowering plant species. The protein is glycosylated and hydrophilic and predicted to be associated in vivo with the external face of the PM by means of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (Borner et al., 2003). AIR12 has been found to be associated with lipid rafts together with other redox proteins (Lefebvre et al., 2007), which may act as its partners in a possible electron link between apoplast and symplast. RESULTS Purification of PM Ascorbate-Reducible Cytochrome b from Etiolated Soybean Hypocotyls Purification of PM ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b from etiolated soybean hypocotyls was performed following the protocol described previously for bean hypocotyls (Preger et al., 2005; see “Materials and Methods” for details). This protocol leads to almost complete purification of a major ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b, previously demonstrated by isopicnic centrifugation to be associated with the PM (Preger et al., 2005). The cytochrome eluted from the last chromatographic step (Superdex 200 gel filtration chromatography; data not shown) as a peak of approximately 70 kD. This peak, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, contained two major bands. A faint and broad band around 60 kD had a distribution in the gel lanes that nicely matched the ascorbate-reduced cytochrome signals in Superdex 200 fractions (Fig. 1
Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry Because the soybean genome is not well annotated yet, precautions were taken to avoid false identifications, and two different tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) search engines were used. For the 100-kD band, the X!tandem search allowed identification of a soybean EST corresponding to a predicted protein (gene no. Glyma05g04270) as revealed by a BLAST analysis against the soybean genome (http://www.phytozome.net/soybean.php). Using MASCOT, the 100-kD bands were found to correspond to a protein from grape (Vitis vinifera) annotated as a homolog of the multicopper oxidase SKU5 from Arabidopsis (gene no. At4g12420). A multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW (data not shown) revealed that these three candidate proteins share more than 76% identity, indicating that the 100-kD band likely corresponds to a SKU5 multicopper oxidase from soybean. For the band of lower molecular mass (about 60 kD), MASCOT only detected a vegetative storage protein A from soybean (gene no. Glyma07g01730), whereas X!tandem allowed identification not only of this same protein, but also of another protein (gene no. Glyma03g22260) annotated as being similar to Arabidopsis AIR12 (gene no. At3g07390). In addition, peptide mass fingerprints were also performed with the same peptide mixtures as used for nano-liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS. For both bands, these analyses confirmed the identifications and increased the sequence coverage. All mass spectrometry (MS) and MS/MS results are summarized in Supplemental Table S1. The results were further strengthened by the identification of the PM ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b of bean hypocotyls (Preger et al., 2005), having the same properties and purified by the same procedure as the soybean protein identified above. Two peptides from the tryptic digest of the 63-kD band in SDS-PAGE corresponding to the purified bean cytochrome were sequenced by Edman degradation. The two sequences (Ala-Leu-[Thr]-X-Ala-Ser-Phe-Lys and Asp-Gly-Lys-Pro-Met-Ile-His-Asp-Ser-[Lys]-Pro-Asp-Asn-Leu-Gln-Ala) perfectly match a Phaseolus coccineus complete cDNA (FJ535652) corresponding to the bean ortholog of Arabidopsis AIR12 (At3g07390). Overall, these results are compatible with the ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b of the PM being coded by AIR12 in soybean and other plants. AIR12 Constitutes a New Protein Family Specific to Flowering Plants AIR12 belongs to the DOMON (for dopamine β-monooxygenase N terminus) domain superfamily, which includes proteins with very different functions, wide phyletic distribution, and different domain architectures (Aravind, 2001; Ponting, 2001; Iyer et al., 2007). The DOMON superfamily includes heme- as well as sugar-binding proteins. BLAST searches for AIR12 orthologs in public databases identified a large number of protein sequences of similar size from different flowering plant species (both monocots and dicots), but apparently no orthologs in any other group of green organisms, such as gymnosperms, ferns, mosses, or algae (green and others), or in nonphotosynthetic eukaryotes, bacteria, or archaea. Additional protein sequences, less closely related to AIR12 and generally much longer than AIR12, were also retrieved and found to contain a DOMON domain linked to a cytochrome b561 domain (Aravind, 2001; Ponting, 2001; Verelst and Asard, 2003; Tsubaki et al., 2005; Iyer et al., 2007). Extensive analysis of the complete genomes of Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa) evidenced 12 and 15 DOMON-containing proteins, respectively (see “Materials and Methods” for search conditions). A phylogenetic analysis of 27 AIR12 sequences from 22 flowering plant species, together with all sequences of Arabidopsis and rice containing a DOMON domain, is presented in Figure 2
Expression and Purification of Soybean AIR12 in Pichia pastoris To get better insights into the properties of the AIR12 protein, a modified version of soybean AIR12 cDNA was introduced in the eukaryotic system P. pastoris for heterologous expression. An expression vector pPICZαB containing the soybean AIR12 cDNA downstream of the ALCOHOL OXIDASE1 (AOX1) promoter and an α-factor secretion signal sequence was constructed and used to transform P. pastoris. Transformants with multicopies of AIR12 cDNA were screened exploiting their hyper-resistance to zeocin. Positive clones were cultured and induced for production of recombinant AIR12 (recAIR12). The yields of recAIR12 were assessed by spectrophotometric analysis of the induction medium. Ascorbate-reduced minus oxidized spectra of culture solutions of recAIR12 positive clones revealed the presence of a cytochrome b starting from 24 h after induction. RecAIR12 concentrations were calculated from reduced minus oxidized spectra using a differential extinction coefficient ( 561–571) of 21 mm−1, as determined by the pyridine hemochrome method with the assumption that AIR12 binds a single heme (see below). The absorption maximum of the pyridine hemochrome at 557 nm strongly suggested that recAIR12 binds indeed a b-type heme (Porra and Jones, 1963). Maximum yields were obtained 48 h after induction and were estimated to be approximately 400 nmol L−1 (10 mg AIR12/L). No detectable b-type cytochromes were observed in the extracellular medium of control cultures.RecAIR12 was purified from the culture medium of P. pastoris by means of three chromatographic steps, including a phenyl Sepharose hydrophobic interaction column, followed by an anion-exchange column and gel filtration. The cytochrome eluted from a Superdex 200 gel filtration column as a single symmetric peak of 163 ± 25 kD (n = 6; Fig. 4A 280 of 29.5 mm−1 calculated on recAIR12 sequence) and heme ( 280 of 12 mm−1; Butt and Keilin, 1962). Based on these extinction coefficients, the ratio A418:A280 of 2.1 of purified recAIR12 could be translated into a ratio of 0.7 heme:apoprotein.
Upon deglycosylation of the native purified protein by endoglycosidase H, the apparent molecular mass dropped to 39 kD (Fig. 4B The purified recAIR12 migrates on SDS-PAGE as a high-molecular-mass broad band from 65 to 90 kD, hardly detected by Coomassie staining together with a contaminant of 50 kD (Fig. 5A
For N-terminal sequencing of recAIR12, purified preparations were blotted on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes after SDS-PAGE and two bands were detected by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. Both bands were separately analyzed by Edman degradation and, in each case, two or three amino acids were detected at each cycle. However, both bands gave similar sequences corresponding to two major peptides Gln-Pro-Ala-Val-Ser-Asp-Arg-Tyr-Pro and Val-Ala-Gln-Pro-Ala-Val-Ser-Asp-Arg-Tyr-Pro and another minor peptide Gly-Ile-His-Val-Ala-Gln-Pro-Ala. This suggests that maturation of recAIR12 in P. pastoris generates a small heterogeneity at the N terminus. Nevertheless, all three peptides correspond to the N-terminal sequence of recAIR12, thereby validating the purity of recAIR12 preparations (Supplemental Fig. S1). Characterization of AIR12 as a High-Potential, Ascorbate-Reducible Cytochrome b Binding a Single Low-Spin Heme Absorption spectra of purified recAIR12 show a symmetric α-band centered at 561 nm in the reduced form together with a β-band at 530 nm and a γ-band at 427 nm (Fig. 6
To check whether recAIR12 could be oxidized by MDA, ascorbate oxidase was added to the reduced cytochrome in the presence of ascorbate (Fig. 8
The EPR spectrum of oxidized recAIR12 shows a ramp-shaped signal with a large gmax value (3.3), and undetectable gmid and gmin (Fig. 9
Potentiometric redox titrations of recAIR12 at pH 7.0 showed a redox response distributed over more than 200 mV, mostly comprised between +80 and +300 mV (Fig. 10
DISCUSSION The capability of plant cells to reduce external electron acceptors by means of a PM redox system is a long-known phenomenon with still scarce molecular basis (Lüthje, 2008). In whole cells or intact tissues, reduction of electron acceptors was found associated with apoplast acidification, membrane depolarization, or oxidation of internal electron donors, suggesting a transmembrane electron transfer chain fed by cytosolic reductants (Vuletić et al., 2005). PM vesicles loaded with physiological electron donors [ascorbate, NAD(P)H] were found to reduce impermeable electron acceptors (MDA, ferrichelates, ferricyanide) on the apoplastic side of the membrane (Askerlund and Larsson, 1991; Asard et al., 1992; Horemans et al., 1994; Menckhoff and Lüthje, 2004). In this way, PM redox systems may influence the redox state of the apoplast and provide a redox connection between apoplast and symplast. Search for molecular components involved in PM redox reactions led to biochemical characterization of several PM redox proteins, including flavoproteins (e.g. quinone reductases; Serrano et al., 1994; Trost et al., 1997; Schopfer et al., 2008; and MDA reductase; Bérczi and Møller, 1998), b-type cytochromes (Trost et al., 2000; Bérczi et al., 2003; Preger et al., 2005), and peroxidases (Mika et al., 2008). Moreover, molecular biology approaches led to the discovery of flavocytochromes of the FRO family that use cytosolic pyridine nucleotides to reduce apoplastic ferrichelates (Robinson et al., 1999). Structurally similar flavocytochromes (Rboh) are involved in one-electron reduction of oxygen with production of superoxide (Simon-Plas et al., 2002). However, these plant flavocytochromes apparently account for a very minor portion of b-type cytochromes associated with the PM, at least under unstressed conditions. On the other hand, PM preparations from different plant species were invariably found to contain ascorbate-reducible cytochromes b displaying a symmetric α-band around 561 nm and typically responding to high redox potentials, usually in the +50- to +300-mV range at neutral pH, with some differences among species and tissues (Asard et al., 1989; Askerlund et al., 1989). Ascorbate-reducible cytochromes b may represent up to 80% of the total cytochrome content in purified PM preparations (Asard et al., 2001). Ascorbate-reducible cytochromes with a symmetric α-band at 561 nm were shown to be involved in trans-PM electron transport from cytosolic ascorbate to apoplastic MDA (Horemans et al., 1994). The reaction was thought to be catalyzed by a cytochrome b561 of the PM (Asard et al., 2001) in analogy with the system for ascorbate regeneration in chromaffin vesicles of mammals (Kelley and Njus, 1986). This concept needs revision, however, because true cytochrome b561 (CYBASC1) is localized in vacuolar membranes (tonoplast) in both Arabidopsis (Griesen et al., 2004) and bean (Preger et al., 2005), and chromaffin membranes are certainly closer to plant vacuolar membranes than PM. Only CYBASC1 of wild watermelon was found targeted to the PM in GFP construct experiments with onion epidermal cells (Nanasato et al., 2005). Moreover, the optical spectra of bona fide cytochrome b561 (CYBASC1 in plants; Tsubaki et al., 1997; Bérczi et al., 2007) are characterized by an asymmetric α-band with a maximum close to 561 nm and a shoulder at 557 nm, unlike the cytochrome involved in trans-PM electron transport whose α-band is definitely symmetric (Asard et al., 1992). Overall, it is unlikely that cytochrome b561 (CYBASC1) represents a significant fraction of high-potential cytochromes b of plant PM. Little is known about other, minor isoforms of cytochrome b561. Here, we report that a major ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b of the PM, purified from either soybean or bean etiolated hypocotyls, according to previously published procedures (Preger et al., 2005), is to be identified as AIR12 (Neuteboom et al., 1999) because AIR12 is known to be one of approximately 80 Arabidopsis genes that are up-regulated in the root during the first 12 h following auxin treatment (Laskowski et al., 2006). No AIR12 protein has been characterized before. Orthologs of AIR12 are present in all flowering plant species (angiosperms) investigated, generally with one gene or, less frequently, two genes, but they appear to be absent from other groups of green plants or photosynthetic organisms, or in other eukaryotes, bacteria, or archaea. The molecular mass of native AIR12 predicted from soybean sequence (GmAIR12-1; Fig. 3 Bioinformatic studies predict AIR12 to belong to the DOMON (Aravind, 2001) or DoH (Ponting, 2001) domain superfamily. The DOMON domain consists of an all-β-strand fold forming a β-sandwich structure, similar to other extracellular adhesion domains (Aravind, 2001). Plant AIR12s consist of a single DOMON domain and thus appear to be largely hydrophilic proteins. Association of the cytochrome here identified as AIR12 to the PM was previously demonstrated by analytical Suc gradient centrifugation of plant microsomes (Preger et al., 2005). This result is supplemented by recent proteomic studies that identified AIR12 as a PM protein (Dunkley et al., 2006) bound to the external face of the PM by means of a GPI anchor (Borner et al., 2003) and in association with lipid rafts (Lefebvre et al., 2007). AIR12 has been reported among secreted proteins of Medicago truncatula cell cultures, suggesting that the GPI anchor is cleaved under particular conditions with release of the protein (Kusumawati et al., 2008). Purifying adequate amounts of native AIR12 from suitable plant material is a very tedious task, so we have set up a heterologous expression system in P. pastoris. This eukaryotic expression system is also of advantage in that it produces a glycosylated recombinant protein, similar to the native one. The soybean AIR12 gene was transformed in P. pastoris cells into a form with no N-terminal signal peptide and a limited C-terminal deletion to get rid of the GPI anchor. Secreted recAIR12 was purified from culture broth and was found to be glycosylated and soluble in the absence of detergents. The expected molecular mass of the recombinant protein (24 kD) was 13 kD higher due to bound carbohydrates (MALDI-TOF MS). Enzymatic removal of N-glycans gave rise to strongly stained bands at expected positions in SDS gels (Fig. 5 RecAIR12 shows the typical spectroscopic signature of a cytochrome b with a symmetric α-band at 561 nm and β- and γ-bands at 530 and 429 nm, respectively, following reduction by ascorbate. The cytochrome recAIR12 was sensitive to ascorbate concentrations in the 10−4 to 10−3 m range (i.e. about the same range of ascorbate concentrations found in the apoplast of different plant species; Pignocchi and Foyer, 2003). The reaction with ascorbate was reversible, MDA being an excellent electron acceptor for reduced AIR12. Besides AIR12, other members of the DOMON superfamily have been demonstrated to bind b-type heme (Iyer et al., 2007). The best fitting of recAIR12 potentiometric redox titrations was obtained when two redox centers were introduced in the Nernst equation. RecAIR12 sensitivity to the redox potential, with two apparent midpoint redox potentials at +137 and +236 mV, is in line with that of partially purified PM cytochrome b from bean hypocotyls (+135 and +204 mV; Trost et al., 2000) and Arabidopsis leaves (+135 and +180 mV; Bérczi et al., 2003), and consistent with redox titrations of whole PM preparations (Asard et al., 1989; Askerlund and Larsson, 1991; Bérczi et al., 2003). This also indicates that AIR12 represents a major fraction of high potential and ascorbate-reducible cytochromes b of plant PM. These potentiometric results, however, are unexpected because other data point to one heme only. The crystallographic structure of DOMON of cellobiose dehydrogenase of the fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium (Hallberg et al., 2000) includes a single high-potential heme b (Em7 +164 mV) coordinated by a Met (Met-65) and a His (His-163). In fact, a Met-His couple (Met-91 and His-176 in GmAIR12-1; Fig. 5 The binding of a single heme per molecule is substantiated by different experimental observations, including (1) EPR spectra showing no other low-spin signal than the HALS; (2) the symmetric shape of the α-band of the optical spectrum of partially and fully reduced forms; (3) the A418/A280 ratio of the purified protein consistent with a stoichiometry of one heme per apoprotein; and, finally, (4) multiple alignment of AIR12 sequences did not show other obvious pairs of conserved residues to coordinate a second low-spin heme besides the Met-65/His-163 couple. Further studies are clearly needed to understand the bimodal redox response of AIR12. DOMON domains are widespread in nature, usually in association with other redox domains within larger proteins (Ponting, 2001; Iyer et al., 2007). Interestingly, DOMON domains are often associated with cytochrome b561 moieties, and Arabidopsis contains 10 genes coding for hypothetical proteins with this particular domain association. Most of them have clear orthologs in other plants, including soybean (Verelst and Asard, 2003; Tsubaki et al., 2005). Animal proteins with analogous domain architecture (e.g. SDR2 of Drosophila) are able to reduce extracellular ferrichelates in transfected Xenopus oocytes, suggesting capability of transmembrane electron transport (Vargas et al., 2003). The conclusion that AIR12 is a cytochrome raises the possibility that DOMON domains bound to b561-type cytochromes (groups F1, F2, G of Fig. 2 The role of AIR12 in plant PM redox reactions is still obscure, although an involvement in trans-PM electron transport, and potentially in redox signaling, seems likely. In fact, in ascorbate-loaded PM vesicles, the totality of ascorbate-reducible cytochromes could be oxidized by an external electron acceptor such as ferricyanide or MDA (Asard et al., 1992; Horemans et al., 1994), and AIR12 certainly represents a major ascorbate-reducible cytochrome of plant PM. Trans-PM electron transport involving cytosolic NAD(P)H was also demonstrated, although it is not known whether a cytochrome was involved (Askerlund and Larsson, 1991; Menckhoff and Lüthje, 2004). In any case, because AIR12 is not a transmembrane protein, interactions with other redox partners would be needed to build up an electron route across the PM (Vuletić et al., 2005; Lüthje, 2008). Notably, only a few redox proteins known to interact with the PM are up-regulated in Arabidopsis roots soon after auxin treatment and are implicated in lateral root emergence (Laskowski et al., 2006). These include AIR12, as well as flavodoxin-like quinone reductase (FQR1; Laskowski et al., 2002), multicopper oxidase SKU5, and a putative peroxidase (At5g64100), all of which could interact directly with AIR12 on the apoplastic side of the PM. SKU5, probably an ascorbate oxidase, is involved in directional growth of Arabidopsis roots (Sedbrook et al., 2002); it is also bound to the PM by means of a GPI anchor (Sedbrook et al., 2002), and it copurifies with AIR12 (see Fig. 1 A DOMON-plus-cytochrome b561 protein (AC147406_8.1) has recently been detected in lipid rafts of M. truncatula roots together with AIR12 and other redox proteins (Lefebvre et al., 2007; i.e. orthologs of SKU5 and FQR1). Peroxidases are also part of the set of redox proteins included in lipid rafts (Lefebvre et al., 2007) and an ascorbate peroxidase was suggested to interact with ascorbate-reducible cytochrome b in bean hypocotyl PM (Preger et al., 2001). FQR1 is expected to reside on the cytosolic side of the membrane and any interaction with AIR12 would need to be mediated by a membrane-diffusible quinone for which the experimental evidence is still inconclusive (Lüthje, 2008). In any case, this assembly of PM redox proteins and compounds sequestered within lipid rafts may form a potential redox link between cells and apoplast, under the control of auxin, an intriguing hypothesis for a role of PM redox systems in lateral root formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant Materials Etiolated seedlings of soybean (Glycine max ‘Pacific’) were grown for 6 d in the dark on moist vermiculite at 25°C. Chemicals All chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich or Merck unless otherwise stated. Preparation of Soybean Microsomal Membranes Microsomal membranes were prepared as described for bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) hypocotyls (Preger et al., 2005), except for minor modifications. Briefly, hypocotyls (100–200 g fresh weight) were harvested and ground on ice in 2 volumes of homogenization buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mm EDTA, 10 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 250 mm Suc, 2 mm ascorbate, 0.5 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) by means of a blender (Minipimer; Braun) for 20 s at full speed. The resulting slurry was filtered through a 30-μm nylon net and centrifuged at 9,000g for 20 min at 4°C. The pellet was discarded and the microsomal fraction was collected by centrifugation at 110,000g for 1 h at 4°C. Microsomes were resuspended in 20 mm Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 20% (v/v) glycerol, at a final concentration of 5 mg mL−1, and stored at −80°C until use. Purification of PM Ascorbate-Reducible Cytochrome b from Soybean Chromatographic medium and systems used for purification were from GE Healthcare. Microsomes (35 mg total protein) were solubilized for 1 h at 4°C under stirring, after the addition of 1% (w/v) octyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (OG) and 1 mm ascorbate in 7 mL of solubilization buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 20% glycerol). Detergent-to-protein ratio was 4:1. Insoluble material was sedimented by centrifugation at 110,000g for 30 min at 4°C. Solubilized microsomal proteins (4 mL) were loaded on an anion-exchange SourceQ column (7 mL) equilibrated with 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mm ascorbate, 1% (w/v) OG. Proteins bound to the resin were eluted with a linear KCl gradient (from 0–0.26 m in 4.7 column volume) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. Optical absorption of the eluate was continuously monitored at 418 and 427 nm and 0.6-mL fractions were collected. PM cytochrome b-containing fractions, deriving from six anion-exchange separations at pH 8 were pooled together, concentrated to 7 mL (Amicon YM-30 and Centricon YM-30; Millipore), equilibrated with 20 mm 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid, pH 10.0, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mm ascorbate, 1% (w/v) OG by means of HiTrap fast-desalting cartridges, and reloaded on the anion-exchange SourceQ column equilibrated with the same buffer. A linear KCl gradient (0–0.5 m in 6.3 column volume) was applied at a 0.5 mL min−1 flow rate, and 0.6-mL fractions were collected. Fractions eluted from 0.04 to 0.09 m KCl were pooled together and concentrated to 0.14 mL by Centricon. The cytochrome was finally loaded on a Superdex 200 (HR 10/30) gel filtration chromatography column equilibrated with 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mm ascorbate, 1% (w/v) OG. Elution was carried out at 0.5 mL min−1 and fractions of 0.2 mL were collected. Protein Identification by MS HPLC-grade acetonitrile (ACN), Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250, dithiothreitol, formic acid, iodoacetamide, and trifluoroacetic acid were purchased from Sigma; Tris and Gly from Bio-Rad; and PVDF membrane from Millipore. HPLC-grade ethanol and acetic acid were purchased from VWR. Bands of interest were excised manually and subjected to in-gel digestion by bovine trypsin (Roche Diagnostics) using the automated protein digestion system DigestPro-96 (Intavis AG). Peptides were extracted first with 1% TFA, then with 60% ACN containing 1% TFA, dried in a SpeedVac concentrator (Savant), and resuspended in 5% ACN/0.1% formic acid. Nano-LC-CHIP-IT-MS/MS experiments were performed on an Agilent 1200 nanoflow LC system coupled to a 6330 ion trap equipped with the Chip Cube orthogonal ionization system (Agilent Technologies). For MS/MS experiments, the system was operated in positive-ion mode with automatic switching between MS and MS/MS modes, whereas MS/MS scanning was performed in the ultrascan resolution mode. A total of six scans were averaged to obtain a MS spectrum, whereas three scans were averaged for the MS/MS spectrum. MS/MS data were analyzed by data analysis software, version 3.4 (Agilent Technologies). Peptide mass fingerprints were also performed by MALDI-TOF MS as described previously (Marchand et al., 2006). Mass spectra were analyzed by DataExplorer, version 5.1 (Applied Biosystems). Protein identifications were performed using two search engines: MASCOT MS/MS Ions search (http://www.matrixscience.com) and X!tandem (http://prowl.rockefeller.edu). The identifications were validated according to the established guidelines for proteomic data publication (Carr et al., 2004; Bradshaw et al., 2006) and notably protein identification was validated only if at least two different sequences were identified with high-quality mass spectra (MASCOT ion score >40). Moreover, the false discovery rate was estimated with X!tandem at less than 0.61% by searches against reversed databases. Detailed protocols and procedures are provided in Supplemental File S1. For automated Edman degradation, peptides from in-gel tryptic digest of a purified sample were first subjected to HPLC separation on a C-18 reverse-phase column. Automated Edman degradation of two peptides was performed with an Applied Biosystems Procise 494 cLC protein sequencer at the W.M. Keck Facility. Heme Content Analysis Heme content of recAIR12 samples was analyzed using the pyridine hemochrome method as described in Metzger et al. (1997). Heme b content was calculated from dithionite-reduced minus ferricyanide-oxidized spectra of pyridine hemochrome using a differential extinction coefficient (557–541 nm) of 20.7 mm−1 (Porra and Jones, 1963). Using this assay, the reduced minus oxidized extinction coefficient for recAIR12 heme at 561 nm relative to the isosbestic wavelength of 571 nm was calculated to be 21 mm−1. Assay of Protein and AIR12 Content Total protein was assayed by the method of Bradford. RecAIR12 content was calculated from dithionite-reduced minus oxidized spectra ( 561−571 21 mm−1), considering a stoichiometry of one heme per AIR12 molecule.Expression of RecAIR12 of Soybean in Pichia pastoris An EST clone containing the full-length soybean AIR12 cDNA (GenBank accession no. FJ528079) was purchased from Biogenetic Services and used as a template for PCR. Two oligonucleotide primers were designed for ligation of a truncated form of AIR12 cDNA into the KpnI site of the expression vector pPICZαB (Invitrogen) in frame with the c-myc epitope and a polyhistidine tag. Sense and antisense primers were 5′-CATGGGTACCCTATGCTCATCTGCGCTTCCC-3′ and 5′-CATGGGTACCGGCGCGGGCGCAGTCGCGTT-3′, respectively (KpnI sites are underlined). The oligonucleotides amplified a region of the gene right after the N-terminal leader peptide encoding sequence. To recover the recombinant protein in the culture medium, avoiding GPI anchoring to the yeast membranes, the sequence coding for the C-terminal GPI signal peptide was also omitted from the amplified cDNA (Fig. 3 Purification of RecAIR12 Chromatographic medium and systems used for purification were from GE Healthcare. Two days after induction, cultures of P. pastoris X-33/pPICZαB-AIR12 were spun down (10 min at 1,500g). The supernatant (220 mL) was concentrated to 10 mL (Amicon YM-10) and equilibrated to pH 5.5 with 1 m MES. The sample was then centrifuged at 35,000g for 1 h at 4°C to remove excess hemin (which precipitates at pH 5.5), then loaded on a Octyl Sepharose 4 fast-flow column (12 mL) equilibrated with 50 mm potassium phosphate, pH 7, (NH4)2SO4 1.7 m. RecAIR12-containing fractions, eluting in the column flow-through, were pooled, diluted twice with water to lower salt content, and concentrated to 7.5 mL (Amicon YM-10). Proteins were then equilibrated with 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 1 mm EDTA, by means of PD-10 columns and loaded on an anion-exchange SourceQ column (7 mL) equilibrated with the same buffer. A linear KCl gradient (0–0.5 m in three-column volume) was applied at a 0.5 mL min−1 flow rate, and 0.4-mL fractions were collected. RecAIR12-containing fractions were pooled, concentrated to 0.2 mL, and loaded on a Superdex 200 (HR 10/30) gel filtration chromatography column equilibrated with 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 2 mm EDTA, 150 mm KCl. Elution was carried out at 0.5 mL min−1 and fractions of 0.2 mL were collected. Protein Deglycosylation For protein deglycosylation Endo H (New England BioLabs) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Incubation of denatured samples with Endo H was carried out at 37°C for 1 h. For deglycosylation of the native nondenatured protein, the incubation was done overnight at 22°C. Expression of RecAIR12 of Soybean in Escherichia coli for Polyclonal Antibody Production A truncated form of soybean AIR12 lacking the N-terminal signal peptide and C-terminal hydrophobic signal peptide (see Fig. 3 Electrophoresis and Western Blotting SDS-PAGE was performed on 12.5% acrylamide gels. Samples were boiled for 10 min in sample buffer prior to loading. Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. The staining of glycoproteins was done according to Leach et al. (1980). To visualize hemoproteins, recAIR12-containing samples were resolved on 12.5% PAGE, using LDS in the gel, sample, and running buffer instead of SDS, according to the method of Sinclair et al. (1981). Electrophoresis was conducted at a constant 90 V, 4°C, for 3 h and staining was performed as described by Thomas et al. (1976). For western blotting, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electroblotted (semidry cell; Schleicher-Schuell) onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were stained with Red Ponceau before incubation with rabbit antiserum raised against AIR12 expressed in E. coli (see above), and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted 1:2,000 and 1:1,000, respectively. Blots were developed by chemiluminescence according to standard procedures. N-Terminal Sequencing and Molecular Weight Determination by MALDI-TOF MS After deglycosylation treatment with EndoH, proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto PVDF membranes (pore size 0.2 μm) using the liquid Mini Trans-Blot Cell (Bio-Rad). Bands detected by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining were cut and subjected to automated Edman degradation using a Procise sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The molecular weight of recAIR12 was determined by MALDI-TOF MS without the desalting step, as described previously (Zaffagnini et al., 2007). Redox Titrations Spectrophotometric titrations were performed essentially as described in Venturoli and Zannoni (1988), using a Jasco V-550 spectrophotometer and an anaerobic titrator (1-cm light path, 3.2-mL sample volume) equipped with a platinum electrode. Measurements were done with a pH meter using a calomel electrode as reference. The ferro-ferricyanide redox couple was used to calibrate the system according to O'Reilly (1973). An oxidized recAIR12 sample (approximately 1.2 μm) in 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 20 mm KCl or 50 mm MES-KOH, pH 5.5, 20 mm KCl was mixed with redox mediators: 1 μm phenazine methosulfate (Em7 = +80 mV), 1 μm phenazine ethosulfate (Em7 = +33 mV), 10 μm 1,4-naphtoquinone (Em7 = +60 mV), 10 μm 1,2-naphtoquinone (Em7 = +157 mV), 10 μm p-benzoquinone (Em7 = +280 mV). Reductive titration was performed at room temperature under N2 flow by addition of small aliquots of sodium ascorbate or sodium dithionite solution. After each addition, the sample was stirred and allowed to equilibrate before recording the visible spectrum. The fraction of maximal change in A561 as a function of redox potential was fitted to the Nernst equation for one or two redox components with unknown percentage contribution to the total response. Nonlinear regression analysis was performed with Costat (CoHort software). Measurements of EPR Spectra Samples containing 120 μm purified recAIR12 dissolved in 50 mm MES-KOH, pH 5.5, 150 mm KCl were withdrawn into EPR tubes. Oxygen was removed by flushing nitrogen above the solutions in the EPR tubes. The samples were flash cooled in liquid nitrogen before insertion in the EPR spectrometer at 10K. Continuous-wave EPR measurements were performed on a Bruker Elexsys E580 spectrometer at 9.4 GHz, equipped with standard TE102 cavity. The temperature was controlled with a helium flow cryostat (Oxford Instruments ESR-900) driven by a temperature controller. Reduction of the samples was obtained by adding a few microliters of a concentrated ascorbate solution (final concentration approximately 5 mm) directly in the EPR tubes. Further reduction was achieved by adding sodium dithionite (few grains). Experimental conditions were T = 10K, microwave power = 2 mW, field modulation = 100 kHz, modulation amplitude = 10 G, time constant = 82 ms, conversion time = 164 ms; g values were estimated by calibration with a diphenylpicrylhydrazyl sample. Spin quantification of the high-spin hemes relative to the HALS species was performed by simulation of the X-band EPR spectrum and double integration of the contribution of each individual species. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses All proteins containing a DOMON domain (IPR005018) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa ‘japonica’ group) were identified in the INTERPRO database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro). AIR12 sequences were identified by BLASTp searches in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) protein database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and in sequenced genomes in Joint Genome Institute databases (http://genome.jgi-psf.org). Additional sequences were retrieved by tBLASTn searches in NCBI GenBank and dbEST databases. For each EST identified, the corresponding Unigene cluster was retrieved (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/unigene) and used for EST assembly with the CAP3 program (Huang and Madan, 1999). Contigs containing complete open reading frames were translated to generate AIR12 protein sequences. All protein sequences used in this study are provided in Supplemental File S2. Multiple sequence alignments were performed with the ClustalW program. The unrooted phylogenetic tree was generated with the ClustalX2 program and visualized with Treeview. Conserved domains were determined using the CD search service of NCBI conserved domain database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd). The presence of signal peptides and potential cleavage sites were determined using PSORT (http://psort.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp). GPI anchors were analyzed using the GPI-SOM program (http://gpi.unibe.ch). Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession numbers FJ528079 and FJ535652. Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Notes 1This work was supported by the Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione (grants FIRB 2004 and PRIN 2007). The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Valeria Preger (valeria.preger/at/unibo.it). [C]Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition. [W]The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA]Open access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Aug; 6(4):379-89.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003]Plant Cell. 2005 Jul; 17(7):1866-75.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Feb 8; 366(2):271-4.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008]Biochem J. 1998 Jun 1; 332 ( Pt 2)():507-15.
[Biochem J. 1998]Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004; 55():373-99.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Aug; 6(4):379-89.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003]New Phytol. 2005 Jan; 165(1):131-41.
[New Phytol. 2005]Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Jun; 5(6):263-7.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2000]Plant Physiol. 2003 Feb; 131(2):697-706.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]J Exp Bot. 2005 Feb; 56(412):685-94.
[J Exp Bot. 2005]Protoplasma. 2001; 217(1-3):77-93.
[Protoplasma. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1986 May 15; 261(14):6429-32.
[J Biol Chem. 1986]J Biol Chem. 1997 Sep 12; 272(37):23206-10.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Science. 2001 Mar 2; 291(5509):1755-9.
[Science. 2001]Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005 Nov 15; 443(1-2):82-92.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Sep 29; 1468(1-2):1-5.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000]Protoplasma. 2003 May; 221(1-2):47-56.
[Protoplasma. 2003]Planta. 2005 Jan; 220(3):365-75.
[Planta. 2005]Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Jun; 47(6):788-92.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun; 132(2):568-77.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2007 May; 144(1):402-18.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Planta. 2005 Jan; 220(3):365-75.
[Planta. 2005]Planta. 2005 Jan; 220(3):365-75.
[Planta. 2005]Trends Biochem Sci. 2001 Sep; 26(9):524-6.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2001]Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Aug 15; 10(17):1853-8.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2001]Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 15; 23(20):2660-4.
[Bioinformatics. 2007]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R38.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Dec 1; 1753(2):174-90.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Dec 1; 1753(2):174-90.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005]Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1; 23(21):2947-8.
[Bioinformatics. 2007]Biochem J. 1963 Apr; 87():186-92.
[Biochem J. 1963]Biochemistry. 1980 Dec 9; 19(25):5734-41.
[Biochemistry. 1980]Anal Biochem. 1976 Sep; 75(1):168-76.
[Anal Biochem. 1976]J Biol Chem. 1984 Feb 25; 259(4):2331-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1984]Chemphyschem. 2006 Jun 12; 7(6):1258-67.
[Chemphyschem. 2006]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Jun; 1048():244-58.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005]Plant Physiol. 1991 Aug; 96(4):1178-1184.
[Plant Physiol. 1991]FEBS Lett. 1992 Jul 20; 306(2-3):143-6.
[FEBS Lett. 1992]Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr; 104(4):1455-1458.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]J Exp Bot. 2004 Jun; 55(401):1343-9.
[J Exp Bot. 2004]Plant Physiol. 1994 Sep; 106(1):87-96.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]Plant Physiol. 1997 Jun; 114(2):737-746.
[Plant Physiol. 1997]Plant Physiol. 2008 Jun; 147(2):864-78.
[Plant Physiol. 2008]Plant Physiol. 1998 Mar; 116(3):1029-36.
[Plant Physiol. 1998]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Sep 29; 1468(1-2):1-5.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000]Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr; 104(4):1455-1458.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]Protoplasma. 2001; 217(1-3):77-93.
[Protoplasma. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1986 May 15; 261(14):6429-32.
[J Biol Chem. 1986]Plant Physiol. 2004 Feb; 134(2):726-34.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Planta. 2005 Jan; 220(3):365-75.
[Planta. 2005]Planta. 2005 Jan; 220(3):365-75.
[Planta. 2005]Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jan; 39(2):273-87.
[Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Jun; 47(6):788-92.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2006]Trends Biochem Sci. 2001 Sep; 26(9):524-6.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2001]Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Aug 15; 10(17):1853-8.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2001]Planta. 2005 Jan; 220(3):365-75.
[Planta. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25; 103(17):6518-23.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun; 132(2):568-77.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Aug; 6(4):379-89.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 15; 23(20):2660-4.
[Bioinformatics. 2007]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Sep 29; 1468(1-2):1-5.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000]Protoplasma. 2003 May; 221(1-2):47-56.
[Protoplasma. 2003]Plant Physiol. 1989 Jul; 90(3):1077-1083.
[Plant Physiol. 1989]Plant Physiol. 1991 Aug; 96(4):1178-1184.
[Plant Physiol. 1991]Structure. 2000 Jan 15; 8(1):79-88.
[Structure. 2000]FEBS Lett. 1992 Jul 28; 307(2):233-6.
[FEBS Lett. 1992]Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Aug 15; 10(17):1853-8.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2001]Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 15; 23(20):2660-4.
[Bioinformatics. 2007]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R38.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Dec 1; 1753(2):174-90.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Sep 23; 1651(1-2):116-23.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003]FEBS Lett. 1992 Jul 20; 306(2-3):143-6.
[FEBS Lett. 1992]Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr; 104(4):1455-1458.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]Plant Physiol. 1991 Aug; 96(4):1178-1184.
[Plant Physiol. 1991]J Exp Bot. 2004 Jun; 55(401):1343-9.
[J Exp Bot. 2004]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Jun; 1048():244-58.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005]Plant Physiol. 2007 May; 144(1):402-18.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Protoplasma. 2001; 217(1-3):137-45.
[Protoplasma. 2001]Planta. 2005 Jan; 220(3):365-75.
[Planta. 2005]Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004 Jun; 3(6):531-3.
[Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004]Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006 May; 5(5):787-8.
[Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Apr 11; 1319(2-3):233-41.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997]Biochem J. 1963 Apr; 87():186-92.
[Biochem J. 1963]FEBS Lett. 1999 Dec 17; 463(3):382-6.
[FEBS Lett. 1999]Biochemistry. 1980 Dec 9; 19(25):5734-41.
[Biochemistry. 1980]Anal Biochem. 1981 Jul 1; 114(2):316-21.
[Anal Biochem. 1981]Anal Biochem. 1976 Sep; 75(1):168-76.
[Anal Biochem. 1976]FEBS J. 2007 Jan; 274(1):212-26.
[FEBS J. 2007]Eur J Biochem. 1988 Dec 15; 178(2):503-9.
[Eur J Biochem. 1988]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Apr 5; 292(3):509-15.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973]Genome Res. 1999 Sep; 9(9):868-77.
[Genome Res. 1999]