• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(6): e5822.
Published online Jun 9, 2009. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0005822
PMCID: PMC2688759

Modulation of eDNA Release and Degradation Affects Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Maturation

Adam J. Ratner, Editor

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated a role for Staphylococcus aureus cidA-mediated cell lysis and genomic DNA release in biofilm adherence. The current study extends these findings by examining both temporal and additional genetic factors involved in the control of genomic DNA release and degradation during biofilm maturation. Cell lysis and DNA release were found to be critical for biofilm attachment during the initial stages of development and the released DNA (eDNA) remained an important matrix component during biofilm maturation. This study also revealed that an lrgAB mutant exhibits increased biofilm adherence and matrix-associated eDNA consistent with its proposed role as an inhibitor of cidA-mediated lysis. In flow-cell assays, both cid and lrg mutations had dramatic effects on biofilm maturation and tower formation. Finally, staphylococcal thermonuclease was shown to be involved in biofilm development as a nuc mutant formed a thicker biofilm containing increased levels of matrix-associated eDNA. Together, these findings suggest a model in which the opposing activities of the cid and lrg gene products control cell lysis and genomic DNA release during biofilm development, while staphylococcal thermonuclease functions to degrade the eDNA, possibly as a means to promote biofilm dispersal.

Introduction

Bacterial biofilm is defined as an ordered assembly of bacterial cells contained within a polymeric matrix [1], [2]. Not only does the matrix provide a structural and protective physical barrier against harsh environmental conditions such as the host immune response and desiccation, it also provides a physiological niche in which the cells become more resistant to the killing effects of antibacterial agents. Recent studies demonstrate that the biofilm matrix can be comprised of a variety of important structural components including polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA [3][9]. The importance of extracellular genomic DNA (eDNA) as a structural component of biofilm was first demonstrated in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [10] but has subsequently been demonstrated in a variety of bacterial species using experiments in which eDNA is removed from the biofilm or that utilize lysis defective mutants unable to release normal amounts of genomic DNA into the matrix [6], [7], [11], [Rice, 2007 #22][12][15]. Recent data also suggest that the presence of DNA within the matrix may contribute to the recalcitrance of biofilms to antibiotics by inducing expression of antibiotic resistance genes [16].

The molecular mechanisms facilitating release of eDNA have been studied in P. aeruginosa [17], S. aureus [7], and Enterococcus faecalis [12]. The results of a study by Webb et al. [17] suggest that bacteriophage-mediated cell death and lysis of P. aeruginosa promotes microcolony development and dispersal. In experiments with Enterococcus faecalis, Thomas et al. [12] demonstrated the effects of two secreted proteases, GelE and SprE, on biofilm development. The GelE protease is the effector of lysis while the SrpE protease was described as an immunity factor that opposes the effects of GelE. It was proposed that a balance between these two proteases affects cell wall hydrolysis and lysis of a subpopulation of cells resulting in release of genomic DNA and enhanced biofilm formation [12]. Although the specific mechanisms controlling cell death and lysis are likely to vary among species, these studies demonstrate that the control of these processes has a significant impact on biofilm development.

In S. aureus, cell death and lysis have been shown to be controlled by the cid and lrg operons, which have opposing effects on murein hydrolase activity and antibiotic tolerance during planktonic growth [18], [19]. The products of the cidA and lrgA genes are proposed to function as holins and antiholins, respectively, regulating cell lysis in a manner thought to be analogous to that observed during bacteriophage-mediated cell lysis [18], [20], [21]. Expression of the cid and lrg operons is regulated by the LytSR [22] and CidR [23] regulators which function in response to changes in membrane potential [24] and glucose metabolism-mediated acetic acid accumulation in the culture medium [25], respectively. Recently, the cidA gene was shown to promote cell lysis and the release of DNA during the development of a biofilm [7]. The importance of this eDNA in biofilm formation was demonstrated by the observation that biofilm adherence could be reduced by treatment with exogenously added DNase I. These studies suggest that the biological function of the Cid/Lrg system involves the coordinated regulatory control of cell lysis during biofilm development.

In the study presented here, we examined additional elements affecting eDNA levels within a developing S. aureus biofilm. Consistent with our previous findings, the S. aureus cidA gene displayed a positive role in cell lysis during biofilm development [7] while the lrg operon, as an inhibitor of lysis [19], exhibited a negative role. Interestingly, mutations in both of these operons led to aberrant biofilm maturation, indicating that balanced expression of these genes is important in biofilm development. Finally, staphylococcal thermonuclease was also shown to be important in biofilm development, suggesting that the eDNA produced as a result of lysis is countered by nuclease-mediated degradation.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The Staphylococcus aureus strains used in this study were derived from the previously characterized osteomyelytis isolate, UAMS-1 [26], and are listed along with plasmids used in Table 1. All the experiments were initiated using fresh overnight cultures grown at 37°C in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (EMD Biosciences, Gibbstown, NJ) using a 10[ratio]1 flask to volume ratio.

Table 1
Strains and plasmids used in this study.

DNA manipulations

An lrgAB mutation was generated in the UAMS-1 background using a deletion plasmid previously used to make the lrgAB mutant in strain RN6390 [19]. This plasmid was transformed into S. aureus strain RN4220 by electroporation, spread onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates containing Erm and incubated at 30°C overnight. The plasmid was then transferred into UAMS-1 by phage-mediated transduction [27]. Transductants were grown at the non-permissive temperature (43°C) in the presence of tetracycline to select for cells in which the plasmid had integrated into the chromosome via homologous recombination. To promote a second recombination event, a single colony was inoculated into antibiotic-free TSB and grown at 30°C for five days after performing 1[ratio]1000 dilutions into fresh antibiotic-free media each day. After the fifth day the culture was diluted and plated on TSA medium to yield isolated colonies. The colonies were then screened for ErmR and TcS. Verification that the lrgA and lrgB genes had been deleted was carried out by PCR amplification and Southern blot analyses. The confirmed mutant strain was designated KB1045.

Complementation of the lrgAB mutation was achieved using a plasmid expressing the lrgAB operon using its native promoter. The S. aureus sequence for strain MRSA252, which has been shown to be most closely related to UAMS-1 [28], was used to design an oligonucleotide primer (lrgA-pro-BamHI-F; 5′-CGCGGATCCGAATCGTTATGAAAAACGATTGAATCC-3′) that annealed to the sequence starting 308 bp upstream of the lrgA locus while inserting a BamHI restriction endonuclease cleavage site at the 5′ end of the fragment. Another primer (lrgB-KpnI-R; 5′-GCGGGTACCTTAGAAGAATATTGCTACAAAGACAGGC-3′) was designed to anneal near the end of the lrgB gene and incorporate a KpnI restriction site at the 3′ end of the amplified DNA fragment. After PCR amplification, the lrgAB-containing DNA fragment was sub-cloned using the TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and pCR2.1 into E. coli strain DH5α and subsequently sequenced to ensure that no mutations had been introduced during PCR-amplification. Next, the lrgAB insert was excised by digestion with BamHI and KpnI, and inserted into the low-copy vector, pJE04 (Table 1). This resulting complementation plasmid, designated pDR45, was transformed into S. aureus RN4220 by electroporation and then into KB1045 generating strain KB1046 (Table 1).

Static biofilm assays

To determine the sensitivity of biofilms to DNase I and polyanethole sulfonate (PAS), static biofilm assays were performed as described previously [7]. Costar 3596 (Corning Life Sciences, Acton, MA) plates were pre-coated for 24 h with 200 µl of 20% (vol/vol) human plasma (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in bicarbonate buffer. Wells were inoculated with 200 µl of overnight S. aureus cultures diluted in tryptic soy broth (TSB) supplemented with 3.0% (wt/vol) NaCl and 0.5% (wt/vol) glucose (TSBsg) to an OD600 of 0.05. Where indicated, 28 U of DNase I per well or 500 µg/ml PAS per well was added. Static biofilms comparing the phenotypes of the UAMS-1, KB1050, KB1045, and KB1046 strains were performed similarly except that 16% plasma was used to coat all the wells, and the media used was supplemented with 0.5% glucose (TSBg). Static biofilms were grown for 24 h and adherence was analyzed by washing twice with 200 µl phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fixing with 100 µl ethanol for 1 min, and staining with 100 µl crystal violet for 1 min as previously described. Biofilm quantification was performed by measuring the amount of crystal violet retained in the wells (at A595) with a Victor3 Multilabel Counter (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). Isolation of eDNA from static biofilms was performed as described previously [7]. After 24 h, the plates were chilled at 4°C for 15 min, and 1.0 µl of 0.5 M EDTA was added to each well. The supernatants were discarded, and the unwashed biofilms were harvested by resuspension in 50 mM TES buffer (Tris_HCl; pH 8.0/10 mM ETDA/500 mM NaCl) and transferred into pre-chilled tubes. After centrifugation for 5 min at 4°C, 100 µl of each supernatant was transferred to a tube containing 300 µl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris_HCl; pH 8.0/1.0 mM EDTA), and extracted once with an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25[ratio]24[ratio]1) and once with chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24[ratio]1). The aqueous phase of each sample was then mixed with 1/10 volume of 3.0 M Na-acetate (pH 5.2) and three volumes of ice-cold 100% (vol/vol) ethanol and stored at 20°C. The next day, the ethanol-precipitated DNA was collected by centrifugation for 20 min at 4°C and 18,000×g, washed with ice-cold 70% (vol/vol) ethanol, air-dried, and dissolved in 20 µl of TE buffer. Q-PCRs were performed on 1[ratio]10 dilutions of each sample with the LightCycler DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche) using four primer sets [7]. Both the static biofilm assay and eDNA concentration levels were statistically analyzed based on the repeated measures ANOVA method adjusting for gene effects.

Flow-cell biofilm assays

Flow-cell biofilm assays were performed using an FC271 flow-cell apparatus (Biosurfaces Technology Inc, Bozeman, MT) containing a 2 mm thick polycarbonate coupon and assembled according to manufacturer's instructions. Biofilm formation was initiated by inoculating with overnight cultures that had been adjusted to an OD600 of 2.0 and then diluted 1[ratio]1,000 in TSB. A total of 3.0 ml of the diluted culture was injected into the chamber and allowed to incubate statically for 2 hours. After this incubation period, 5% TSB (vol/vol) supplemented with 0.125% glucose was constantly perfused over the biofilm in a once-through system using a Rainin RP-1 Peristaltic Pump (Rainin Instrument LLC, Woburn, MA). Media was pumped at a rate of 0.25 ml/min. For high-inoculum biofilms, the growth conditions were similar except that the media was adjusted to 2% TSB supplemented with 0.2% glucose, and a 1[ratio]100 dilution of overnight culture was used to inoculate the flow-cell chamber.

After three days of biofilm development, macroscopic images were taken using a Canon EOS camera with a macroscopic lens (18–55 mm) (Canon Inc, New York, NY). For confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) analysis, the media flow was stopped and fluorescent dyes were injected into the flow-cell chamber. Syto-9 (1.3 µM final concentration) was applied to identify viable cells in the biofilm, propidium iodide (PI; 4.0 µM final concentration) was added to stain dead cells, and Toto-3 (2.0 µM final concentration) was used to stain both dead cells and eDNA. The media tubing was then clamped and the biofilm was imaged using a Zeiss 510 Meta CLSM with an Achroplan 40×0.8 n.a. water dipping objective. The Syto-9 and PI fluorophores were exited with an argon laser at 488 nm, and the emission band-pass filters used for Syto-9 and PI were 515±15 nm and 630±15 nm, respectively. Excitation of Toto-3 was achieved using a HeNe 633 nm laser and emissions were collected using a 680±30 nm filter. Examination of high-inoculum biofilms was performed using strains each containing pAH9 which confers RFP fluorescence (Table 1) using a Radiance 2100 system (Biorad) with a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope. Z-stacks were collected at 1.0 µm intervals and the images were compiled to generate three-dimensional renderings. All confocal parameters were set using wild-type biofilm and were used as standard settings for comparison to the biofilms produced by the mutant and complementation strains. Regions of interest within the biofilms were selected from similar areas within each flow-cell chamber and each confocal experiment was repeated a minimum of four times. CLSM z-stack processing was performed using both the Zeiss ZEN LE software package (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and the Volocity software (Improvision, Lexington, MA). Measurements of the biofilms produced were performed using the COMSTAT software package [29] calculating the biomass, thickness, and roughness coefficients of the biofilm data accumulated for at least three separate image z-stacks.

Sensitivity of mature, low-inoculum biofilms to DNase I was assessed by growing the biofilms in an FC271 flow-cell apparatus as described above. After one or three days of biofilm development, a mixture of RNase-free DNase I (Qiagen, Valencia, CA; final concentration of 0.5 knitzU•ml−1) and 20 µM CaCl2 was added to the growth medium and biofilm growth was continued for an additional six hours. High-inoculum biofilms were grown for two days before the addition of RNase-free DNase I and 20 µM CaCl2 for a total of three days. All macroscopic images were taken using a Canon EOS camera with a macroscopic lens as described above.

Results

Early lysis is important for biofilm adherence

It has been established that eDNA released as a result of cell lysis aids in the formation of an adherent staphylococcal biofilm [6], [7], [14], [30]. To probe the temporal requirements for lysis during the initial stages of biofilm formation, we performed a time-course experiment in which cell lysis was blocked at various time points during development by the addition of polyanethole sulfonate (PAS), a chemical lysis inhibitor that does not affect growth [31], [32]. After 24 hours of biofilm development, the wells were washed and the amount of biofilm remaining was assessed by staining with crystal violet and quantifying the amount of stain that was retained [7]. Despite the presence of similar amounts of bacterial growth (data not shown), PAS treatment at the zero and two-hour time points resulted in a dramatic reduction in the amount of adherent biomass (Fig. 1) and correlates with lower eDNA levels measured from biofilms grown in the presence of PAS as previously reported [7]. In contrast, the addition of PAS as early as four hours post-inoculation had little effect on biofilm adherence. In parallel, biofilms were exposed to DNase I at each point during this time course experiment to gauge the contribution of eDNA to biofilm adherence. Unlike PAS treatment, the addition of DNase I at all time-points diminished cell adherence (Fig. 1) without having a demonstrable effect on bacterial growth (data not shown). These results indicate that cell lysis during the initial stage of biofilm development releases a sufficient amount of genomic DNA to mediate adherence. Furthermore, removal of this eDNA at any point during biofilm development in this static model of biofilm growth results in decreased biofilm adherence.

Figure 1
Extracellular DNA-mediated attachment of static biofilm.

Effect of lrgAB on biofilm development

Previous results from our laboratory [7] have also demonstrated the dependence of cell lysis during biofilm development on the S. aureus cidA gene encoding a known effector of murein hydrolase activity [18], [25], [33]. In the current study, we have extended our analysis of cell lysis to address the impact of the cid counterpart, lrg, on biofilm formation. After several unsuccessful attempts to demonstrate a reproducible phenotype of the lrgAB mutant in the static biofilm assay (unpublished data), we reasoned that the high level of NaCl (3.0% wt/vol) in the biofilm media may suppress any effect of lrgAB on the biofilm. We based this reasoning on data indicating that a high concentration of NaCl inhibits lrgAB expression [34] and because high NaCl levels are known to enhance autolysis [31]. Thus, static biofilm assays were repeated using medium lacking NaCl supplementation. Under these conditions, the lrgAB mutant (KB1045) biofilm displayed significantly enhanced adherence compared to the parental strain (Fig. 2). Furthermore, wild-type levels of biofilm adherence were restored in the complementation strain (KB1046) expressing lrgAB from a plasmid (Fig. 2A). As observed previously, the cidA mutant (KB1050) exhibited a reduced capacity for biofilm adherence compared to wild-type (Fig. 2A). As biofilm adherence was previously shown to be dependent on the amount of eDNA associated with the biofilm [7], we also measured the relative concentration of eDNA in each biofilm using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). As observed previously [7], the cidA mutant biofilm contained significantly reduced levels of eDNA associated with the biofilm (Fig 2B). Conversely, the lrgAB mutant biofilm demonstrated significantly increased levels of eDNA compared to wild-type (Fig. 2). Importantly, the adherence and eDNA associated with the biofilm produced by the lrgAB complement were not significantly different compared to the wild-type strain. Overall, the results of these experiments suggest that the lrgAB operon has an inhibitory role in cell lysis and adherence during biofilm formation.

Figure 2
Static assays and eDNA quantification.

Analysis of biofilm maturation

Since static assays only measure the early events during biofilm development and not biofilm maturation, we tested the effects of the cid and lrg mutations during later stages of biofilm development by performing flow-cell experiments in which the biofilms were allowed to develop over a period of three days. As shown in Figure 3 (A & B), wild-type S. aureus (UAMS-1) produced biofilm with distinct structures randomly formed throughout the surface of the flow-cell chamber, reminiscent of the three-dimensional tower structures formed by other well-characterized biofilm producers [9], [11], [12], [17], [35]. Staining of the UAMS-1 biofilm with the LIVE/DEAD BacLight viability stain and visualization by CLSM revealed that the tower structures arose from and were surrounded by a flat mat or “lawn” of densely packed cells that was approximately 10 µm thick. The variation in the sizes of the structures formed is evident in macroscopic images taken after three days of biofilm growth (Fig. 3A). Although there is a clear indication of live (green) and dead (red) cells homogeneously scattered throughout the lawn, an increased concentration of dead cells localized within the towers is apparent (Fig 3B), similar to observations of P. aeruginosa biofilm [11]. The tower structures were not observed in static assays and were only visible in the flow-cell assays macroscopically after the second day of incubation (unpublished results). Furthermore, the flow-cell biofilm structures form abundantly using dilute TSBg media and an initial inoculum of approximately 5×105 CFU. This is in contrast to flatter, less structured biofilms grown using higher inoculums to initiate biofilm growth, conditions similar to those used in the static biofilm assay. These observations are consistent with the observation that limiting nutrients allows P. aeruginosa biofilm to form better secondary structure [9].

Figure 3
Flow cell biofilm assays.

In contrast to the parental UAMS-1 strain, the cidA (KB1050) and lrgAB (KB1045) mutants formed biofilms after three days growth that lacked obvious tower structures (Fig. 3; panels C-F). CLSM data demonstrated that the cidA and lrgAB mutants produced biofilms under these conditions that were homogeneous in nature, lacking the densely-packed lawn and tower structures that are characteristic of the wild-type biofilm. As shown in figure 3 (panels G & H), complementation of the lrgAB mutation partially restored the wild-type biofilm phenotype as indicated by the presence of tower structures and the characteristic dense, flat basal biofilm. However, as was observed with the static assay, complementation was incomplete as the tower structures were not as well defined and fewer dead cells were present. The visible abundance of the lawn in the UAMS-1 biofilm compared to the mutants agreed favorably with the roughness coefficients calculated using COMSTAT analysis of the CLSM images, which were 0.238±0.056 for the wild-type biofilm and 0.790±0.121 and 0.941±0.119 for the cidA and lrgAB mutants, respectively. The complemented strain generated a roughness coefficient that was intermediate between the wild-type and mutant strains (0.563±0.071) consistent with the observed architecture visualized in figure 3G and 3H. The average maximum thickness (determined from multiple images) of the biofilms produced by the cidA and lrgAB mutants (143.66±2.40 and 112.75±10.14 µm, respectively) were higher compared to the parental and lrgAB complemented strains (94.50±6.69 and 110.80±3.54 µm, respectively). In addition, the COMSTAT data indicated that the wild-type biofilm contained greater biomass (15.35±1.43 µm3/µm2) compared to the cidA and lrgAB mutant biofilms (8.71±1.56 µm3/µm2 and 4.80±0.56 µm3/µm2, respectively). As above, the reduced biomass generated by the lrgAB mutant was partially complemented (8.69±0.813 µm3/µm2) by the presence of the lrgAB expression from a plasmid. Finally, the CLSM images also revealed a pattern of LIVE/DEAD staining that was distinct in the mutant strains. Notably, the dead cells in the cidA mutant biofilm accumulated to high numbers (Fig. 3D), consistent with the observation that this mutant exhibits normal cell death in stationary phase planktonic cultures but does not lyse [36]. In contrast, the lrgAB mutant appeared to contain more live cells compared to the wild-type strain (Fig. 3; compare panels B & F). Combined, these observations provide further support for the importance of the cid and lrg operons during biofilm formation.

Since the heterogeneous nature of the flow-cell biofilms made QRT-PCR quantification of eDNA difficult, we chose to visualize the eDNA produced within the biofilm using the nucleic acid-specific fluorophore, Toto-3. The advantage of this stain is that it has greater fluorescence enhancement compared to PI and Syto-9 when bound to nucleic acid, thereby facilitating visualization of eDNA by CLSM [37]. As illustrated in Figure 4 (panel A), Toto-3 staining was most prominent in the wild-type biofilm tower structures and was diffuse in nature suggesting that it is detecting eDNA. In contrast, the lrgAB mutant biofilm stained more intensely with Toto-3 throughout the biofilm consistent with the increased levels of eDNA detected in the static assays (Fig. 2). As observed in the previous experiment (Fig. 3), the dense 10 µm basal layer of biofilm and well-defined structures were also absent in the lrgAB mutant. Importantly, complementation of the lrgAB mutant resulted in Toto-3 staining that was more similar to the parental strain, although the diffuse staining associated with the towers was not observed (Fig. 4). Combined, these studies support the model in which the cid and lrg operons encode effectors and inhibitors of cell lysis, respectively, and that they are important for the control of DNA release during biofilm development [20], [38].

Figure 4
Visualisation of eDNA.

Susceptibility of mature staphylococcal biofilm to DNase I

In figure 1, we demonstrated that static biofilms are sensitive to DNase I treatment at any stage during the 24 hour growth period, indicating that eDNA is an important part of the biofilm matrix during the initial stages of biofilm development. To investigate the role of eDNA in more mature biofilm, S. aureus UAMS-1 was grown in the flow-cell biofilm model and treated with DNase I at both early (24 hr) and late (72 hr) time points. The biofilms were then allowed to grow for an additional six hours and visualized. As shown in figure 5, the biofilms exposed to DNase I were visibly disrupted compared to the biofilms imaged immediately prior to DNase I exposure. In contrast, biofilms treated with DNase I after 72 hr growth appeared to be largely resistant to DNase I when comparing pre- and post-DNase I treatment images (Fig. 5). Interestingly, wild-type biofilms initiated with higher inoculums (approximately 1×108 cfu/ml versus 5×105 cfu/ml), resulted in greater sensitivity to DNase I as demonstrated by the nearly complete removal of a three-day old biofilm as determined by CLSM (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that biofilm dispersal is impacted by the age of the biofilm as well as number of bacterial cells used to initiate biofilm growth, illustrating the fact that biofilms established using different conditions are distinct from each other.

Figure 5
Mature biofilm sensitivity to DNase I.

Staphylococcal nuclease effects biofilm maturation

Given the effect of exogenously added DNase I on S. aureus biofilm, we considered the possibility that staphylococcal thermonuclease has a previously unappreciated role in biofilm development. Indeed, the nuc gene encoding staphylococcal thermonuclease was found to be differentially regulated within a biofilm [39], [40] and was recently shown to diminish adherence of UAMS-1 biofilm under conditions where it is over-produced [41]. Therefore, we grew the recently characterized nuc mutant (UAMS-1471) in our flow-cell assay to determine the impact of staphylococcal thermonuclease on biofilm formation. Interestingly, the nuc mutant biofilm exhibited increased Toto-3 staining compared to the parental and complementation strains (Fig. 6). The increased fluorescence intensity can be attributed to increased eDNA levels in the matrix as dilution plating experiments revealed similar viable cell densities between these strains (data not shown). The nuc mutant also had a higher roughness coefficient (0.667±0.058) relative to the parental (0.238±0.056) and complementation strains (0.523±0.174) indicating that the altered level of eDNA had an significant effect on biofilm architecture. The effect of the nuc mutation was even more pronounced in biofilms initiated with higher inoculums, resulting in a doubling in thickness from approximately 10 µm to approximately 20 µm (Fig. S1). These results demonstrate that staphylococcal thermonuclease plays a significant role in biofilm development possibly by degrading the eDNA associated with the biofilm.

Figure 6
Staphylococcal thermonuclease affects biofilm structure.

Discussion

The S. aureus cid and lrg operons have been previously shown to have opposing effects on the control of murein activity and lysis in cells grown in planktonic culture. The cidA gene is an effector of these processes as indicated by the observation that a cidA mutant displays reduced murein hydrolase activity and stationary phase lysis [18], [25], [36]. In contrast, the lrgAB operon is associated with the inhibition of murein hydrolase activity [19]. Combined with the similarities of the cidA and lrgA gene products to bacteriophage-encoded holins, it has been proposed that these proteins function in a manner similar to holins and antiholins, respectively [18], [20], [21], [42]. The results of the current study support this model by demonstrating the opposing effects of the cid and lrg operons in the control of cell lysis during biofilm development and provide additional insight into factors modulating the release and metabolism of genomic DNA within a biofilm.

Building on the observation that an inhibitor of lysis, PAS, reduced genomic DNA release and biofilm adherence [7], we assessed the temporal requirements for lysis during the early stages of biofilm development. As shown in figure 1, addition of PAS within the first four hours of development resulted in the reduced capacity of the biofilm to adhere to the surface of microtiter wells. Interestingly, this effect of PAS was lost after the biofilm was greater than four-hours old, presumably due to the accumulation of sufficient levels of eDNA in the biofilm matrix to allow for adherence throughout the entire time-course of the experiment. Although more mature flow-cell biofilms were also sensitive to DNase I treatment, the effect diminished after three days of growth (Fig. 5), suggesting that the biofilm matrix either becomes less dependent on eDNA over time, or that the matrix becomes resistant to the effects of the DNase I treatment. Recently published results, however, demonstrate that protease treatment can also disrupt a mature biofilm [3], [41], indicating that a proteinaceous component also exists in the biofilm matrix that either protects the eDNA from degradation or independently maintains mature biofilm adherence.

In addition, this is the first study to examine the effect of lrgAB on biofilm development. Since the lrg operon is the inhibitory counterpart to cid, an lrg mutation would be expected to produce an opposing phenotype compared to that of a cid mutation. Indeed, the lrgAB mutant exhibited enhanced biofilm adherence and increased eDNA associated with the biofilm matrix relative to the parental and complemented strains (Figs. 2, ,3,3, and and4).4). In the static assay, this phenotype was found to be partially dependent on the level of NaCl used in the assay media, likely due to the repressive effects that NaCl has on lrgAB expression (unpublished results) and/or the stimulatory effects it has on lysis [31]. Importantly, these data are consistent with the proposed role of lrgA gene product as an antiholin [18], [19], inhibiting the activity of the cidA-encoded holin and allowing increased activity of murein hydrolases.

Another finding of this study was that tower structures, which formed in more mature biofilms, were associated with what appeared to be large quantities of eDNA (Fig. 4). Our CLSM data revealed that the internal regions of the tower structures are devoid of intact cells and are comprised, in part, of eDNA (diffuse red staining) beneath a layer containing a combination of dead cells and eDNA (intense red staining) (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, the tower structures exhibited a lack of staining near the base suggesting that the eDNA in this region has either diffused away, or has been degraded, forming a microenvironment lacking bacteria or eDNA (Fig. 4A). These results are consistent with observations of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis biofilms, which also form hollow voids within tower structures [11], [43]. Furthermore, the preponderance of eDNA in towers has also been observed in P. aeruginosa biofilms [11] and mutations in the cid and lrg homologues of this organism also had opposing effects on cell lysis during biofilm development [44].

In previous studies, our laboratory has described regulatory signals and transcription factors that control cid and lrg expression during planktonic growth [7], [24], [25], [45]. During biofilm development, however, it has been hypothesized that the expression of the cid and lrg operons is differentially regulated within individual cells in the biofilm population and that this control dictates which cells are destined for death and lysis and, on the other hand, which cells remain viable [38]. For example, this model predicts that those cells expressing high levels of cid and low levels of lrg will ultimately die and lyse, while those expressing low levels of cid and high levels of lrg will remain viable. Importantly, the balance between these two opposing operons may be critical in determining the proportion of live and dead cells within a biofilm [20]. Furthermore, the “tipping point” may vary depending on the environmental conditions. Indeed, recent data suggests that staphylococcal biofilms are comprised of distinct anaerobic microenvironments [46] and that cell lysis is enhanced within the anaerobic portions of the biofilm (Philip Stewart; personal communication). Recent studies also indicate that cidA expression is induced under anaerobic conditions and that this leads to cell lysis in these regions of the biofilm (data not shown). Whether or not known regulators of cid and lrg expression, such as LytSR and CidR [22], [23], [45], [47], are involved in the control of their expression within a biofilm remains to be determined.

In general the environmental conditions under which biofilms are grown have a dramatic effect on biofilm development. After several attempts to optimize biofilm structure formation in S. aureus, we observed that a more dilute starting inoculum aided the generation of tertiary structure within the biofilm. The lower inoculum led to pronounced tertiary structure formation in biofilms produced by UAMS-1 (Figs. 3 and and4),4), as well as those produced by USA300 LAC (data not shown). It is hypothesized that growth of biofilms using a high inoculum may subvert tower formation due to the high density of cells on the substratum, resulting in thicker initial biofilms. In contrast, the propagation of biofilms using low inoculums may allow the biofilm to mature more gradually, allowing both temporal and spatial signals needed for secondary structure formation. The initial cell density on the substratum may also explain why “low inoculum” biofilms are more resistant to DNase I treatment at the three-day time point in comparison to “high inoculum” biofilms. For example, since the initial steps of biofilm adherence are lysis dependent (Fig. 1), increased numbers of cells used to initiate biofilm formation may lead to a proportionally increased number of cells undergoing cell lysis and, consequently, an enhanced dependence of biofilm adherence on eDNA and increased sensitivity to DNase I treatment. Alternatively, the greater concentration of cells on the substratum may provide an environment promoting cell lysis and DNA release due to the metabolic activity of thick biofilms [46]. Regardless of the mechanism, continued investigations should lead to important information related to the initial events needed for biofilm development.

Because of the sensitivity of the S. aureus biofilm to DNase I, we explored the possibility that staphylococcal thermonuclease may play a role in biofilm development. This is consistent with the recent finding that nuc makes a significant contribution to the biofilm deficient phenotype of a sarA mutant [41]. In the current study, biofilms produced by the nuc mutant (UAMS-1471) were thicker and contained increased levels of eDNA in the matrix compared to the parental and complemented strains (Fig. 6). Importantly, these phenotypes were observed in biofilms produced using both low (Fig. 6) and high initial inoculums (Fig. S1). Thus, these results suggest that the lysis-mediated release of genomic DNA may be balanced by the active degradation of eDNA by thermonuclease, leading to an optimized level of eDNA associated with the biofilm. Whether this activity is also important in the dispersal of cells from the biofilm, as has been well-documented in S. aureus [3], [48], remains to be determined.

Overall, the results of this study provide further insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlling cell death and lysis during biofilm development and are consistent with the previously proposed functions of the cid and lrg operons in the control of cell lysis. Furthermore, these studies support the role of genomic DNA in biofilm formation and suggest that its degradation may be an important aspect of biofilm maintenance that was not previously recognized. Continued studies of the Cid/Lrg system, including the analysis of the metabolic, temporal, and spatial factors that affect expression of this system should be important for gaining a full understanding of biofilm formation and the specific roles of these proteins in this process.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

High inoculum nuclease mutant biofilms. Biofilms of UAMS-1, nuc mutant, and nuc complemented strains each harboring pAH9 conferring RFP fluorescence where initiated with a 1:100 inoculum. The three-day biofilms of each were imaged using CLSM and z-stacks were rendered using Volocity software.

(0.74 MB TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Paul Fey, Ph.D. at the University of Nebraska Medical Center for his technical assistance and Fang Yu, Ph.D. for her assistance with the statistical analysis of the results generated in this study.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was funded by NIH grant no. R01AI038901 (K.W.B.) and AHA grant no. 0810070Z (E.E.M.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publis, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, et al. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1987;41:435–464. [PubMed]
2. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, DeBeer D, Caldwell D, Korber D, et al. Biofilms, the customized microniche. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2137–2142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Boles BR, Horswill AR. Agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000052. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Vuong C, Otto M. The biofilm exopolysaccharide polysaccharide intercellular adhesion–a molecular and biochemical approach. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;431:97–106. [PubMed]
5. Otto M. Staphylococcal biofilms. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2008;322:207–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Izano EA, Amarante MA, Kher WB, Kaplan JB. Differential roles of poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide and extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:470–476. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Rice KC, Mann EE, Endres JL, Weiss EC, Cassat JE, et al. The cidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:8113–8118. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Lasa I, Penades JR. Bap: a family of surface proteins involved in biofilm formation. Res Microbiol. 2006;157:99–107. [PubMed]
9. Costerton JW. Microbioal Biofilms. In: Ghannoum MaOT, George A., editors. Microbial Biofilms. 1 ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 2004. pp. 5–19.
10. Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science. 2002;295:1487. [PubMed]
11. Allesen-Holm M, Barken KB, Yang L, Klausen M, Webb JS, et al. A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:1114–1128. [PubMed]
12. Thomas VC, Thurlow LR, Boyle D, Hancock LE. Regulation of autolysis-dependent eDNA release by Enterococcus faecalis extracellular proteases influences biofilm development. J Bacteriol 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Steinberger RE, Holden PA. Extracellular DNA in single- and multiple-species unsaturated biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:5404–5410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Qin Z, Ou Y, Yang L, Zhu Y, Tolker-Nielsen T, et al. Role of autolysin-mediated DNA release in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology. 2007;153:2083–2092. [PubMed]
15. Bockelmann U, Janke A, Kuhn R, Neu TR, Wecke J, et al. Bacterial extracellular DNA forming a defined network-like structure. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;262:31–38. [PubMed]
16. Mulcahy H, Charron-Mazenod L, Lewenza S. Extracellular DNA chelates cations and induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000213. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Webb JS, Thompson LS, James S, Charlton T, Tolker-Nielsen T, et al. Cell death in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:4585–4592. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Rice KC, Firek BA, Nelson JB, Yang SJ, Patton TG, et al. The Staphylococcus aureus cidAB operon: evaluation of its role in regulation of murein hydrolase activity and penicillin tolerance. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:2635–2643. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Groicher KH, Firek BA, Fujimoto DF, Bayles KW. The Staphylococcus aureus lrgAB operon modulates murein hydrolase activity and penicillin tolerance. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:1794–1801. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Rice KC, Bayles KW. Molecular control of bacterial death and lysis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:85–109. table of contents. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Rice KC, Bayles KW. Death's toolbox: examining the molecular components of bacterial programmed cell death. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50:729–738. [PubMed]
22. Brunskill EW, Bayles KW. Identification and molecular characterization of a putative regulatory locus that affects autolysis in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:611–618. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Yang SJ, Rice KC, Brown RJ, Patton TG, Liou LE, et al. A LysR-type regulator, CidR, is required for induction of the Staphylococcus aureus cidABC operon. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:5893–5900. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Patton TG, Yang SJ, Bayles KW. The role of proton motive force in expression of the Staphylococcus aureus cid and lrg operons. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:1395–1404. [PubMed]
25. Rice KC, Nelson JB, Patton TG, Yang SJ, Bayles KW. Acetic acid induces expression of the Staphylococcus aureus cidABC and lrgAB murein hydrolase regulator operons. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:813–821. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Gillaspy AF, Hickmon SG, Skinner RA, Thomas JR, Nelson CL, et al. Role of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in pathogenesis of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. Infect Immun. 1995;63:3373–3380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Shafer WM, Iandolo JJ. Genetics of staphylococcal enterotoxin B in methicillin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1979;25:902–911. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Cassat JE, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Murphy E, Projan SJ, et al. Comparative genomics of Staphylococcus aureus musculoskeletal isolates. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:576–592. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, et al. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology. 2000;146(Pt 10):2395–2407. [PubMed]
30. Yang L, Barken KB, Skindersoe ME, Christensen AB, Givskov M, et al. Effects of iron on DNA release and biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology. 2007;153:1318–1328. [PubMed]
31. Yabu K, Kaneda S. Salt-induced cell lysis of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Microbiol. 1995;30:299–303. [PubMed]
32. Wecke J, Lahav M, Ginsburg I, Kwa E, Giesbrecht P. Inhibition of wall autolysis of staphylococci by sodium polyanethole sulfonate “liquoid”. Arch Microbiol. 1986;144:110–115. [PubMed]
33. Rice KC, Patton T, Yang SJ, Dumoulin A, Bischoff M, et al. Transcription of the Staphylococcus aureus cid and lrg murein hydrolase regulators is affected by sigma factor B. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:3029–3037. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Brunskill E. 1995. p. 171. Investigation and analysis of the LytS and LytR two-component regulatory system from Staphylococcus aureus: the molecular control of autolysis: University of Maryland Graduate School.
35. Webb JS, Lau M, Kjelleberg S. Bacteriophage and phenotypic variation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:8066–8073. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Patton TG, Rice KC, Foster MK, Bayles KW. The Staphylococcus aureus cidC gene encodes a pyruvate oxidase that affects acetate metabolism and cell death in stationary phase. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56:1664–1674. [PubMed]
37. Ogris M, Wagner E, Steinlein P. A versatile assay to study cellular uptake of gene transfer complexes by flow cytometry. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1474:237–243. [PubMed]
38. Bayles KW. The biological role of death and lysis in biofilm development. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:721–726. [PubMed]
39. Cassat J, Dunman PM, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Beenken KE, et al. Transcriptional profiling of a Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolate and its isogenic agr and sarA mutants reveals global differences in comparison to the laboratory strain RN6390. Microbiology. 2006;152:3075–3090. [PubMed]
40. Beenken KE, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Macapagal D, Murphy E, et al. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4665–4684. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Tsang LH, Cassat JE, Shaw LN, Beenken KE, Smeltzer MS. Factors contributing to the biofilm-deficient phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus sarA mutants. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3361. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Bayles KW. Are the molecular strategies that control apoptosis conserved in bacteria? Trends Microbiol. 2003;11:306–311. [PubMed]
43. Stewart PS, Rani SA, Gjersing E, Codd SL, Zheng Z, et al. Observations of cell cluster hollowing in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007;44:454–457. [PubMed]
44. Ma L, Conover M, Lu H, Parsek MR, Bayles K, et al. Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000354. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Yang SJ, Dunman PM, Projan SJ, Bayles KW. Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus CidR regulon: elucidation of a novel role for acetoin metabolism in cell death and lysis. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:458–468. [PubMed]
46. Rani SA, Pitts B, Beyenal H, Veluchamy RA, Lewandowski Z, et al. Spatial patterns of DNA replication, protein synthesis, and oxygen concentration within bacterial biofilms reveal diverse physiological states. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:4223–4233. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Brunskill EW, Bayles KW. Identification of LytSR-regulated genes from Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:5810–5812. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Yarwood JM, Bartels DJ, Volper EM, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:1838–1850. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Hanahan D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983;166:557–580. [PubMed]
50. Kreiswirth BN, Lofdahl S, Betley MJ, O'Reilly M, Schlievert PM, et al. The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage. Nature. 1983;305:709–712. [PubMed]
51. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, Mehdi S, Perlroth J, et al. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1445–1453. [PubMed]
52. Kazakova SV, Hageman JC, Matava M, Srinivasan A, Phelan L, et al. A clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among professional football players. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:468–475. [PubMed]
53. Charpentier E, Anton AI, Barry P, Alfonso B, Fang Y, et al. Novel cassette-based shuttle vector system for gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:6076–6085. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...