![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dietary Supplementation With Vitamin E Ameliorates Cardiac Failure in Type I Diabetic Cardiomyopathy by Suppressing Myocardial Generation of 8-iso-Prostaglandin F2α and Oxidized Glutathione From the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Cardiovascular Biology, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208 Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Michael F. Hill, Ph.D., Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Room #383, Preston Research Building, Nashville, TN 37232, Telephone: (615) 936-2412, Fax: (615) 936-1872, E-mail: michael.f.hill/at/Vanderbilt.Edu The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at J Card Fail.Abstract Background Diabetic cardiomyopathy has been documented as an underlying etiology of heart failure (HF) in diabetic patients. Although oxidative stress has been implicated in diabetic cardiomyopathy, much of the current evidence lacks specificity. Furthermore, studies investigating antioxidant protection with vitamin E in this unique cardiac phenomenon have yet to be performed. In the present study, we sought to determine whether vitamin E supplementation can confer cardioprotective effects against diabetic cardiomyopathy in relation to specific and quantitative markers of myocardial oxidative stress. Methods and Results Diabetes was induced in rats by a single injection of streptozotocin (STZ). Animals were fed either a basal diet or a diet enriched with 2000 IU of vitamin E/kg beginning immediately after induction of diabetes and continued for 8 weeks. Rats were examined for diabetic cardiomyopathy by left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic analysis. Myocardial oxidative stress was assessed by measuring the formation of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso PGF2α) as well as oxidized glutathione (GSSG). In the un-supplemented STZ-diabetic rats, LV systolic pressure (LVSP), rate of pressure rise (+dP/dt), and rate of pressure decay (−dP/dt) were depressed while LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was increased, indicating reduced LV contractility and slowing of LV relaxation. These hemodynamic alterations were accompanied by increased myocardial formation of 8-iso PGF2α and GSSG. Vitamin E supplementation improved LV function and significantly attenuated myocardial 8-iso PGF2α and GSSG accumulation in STZ-diabetic rats. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the usefulness of vitamin E supplementation during the early phases of type I diabetes for the prophylaxis of cardiomyopathy and subsequent HF. Keywords: cardiomyopathy, oxidative stress, type I diabetes mellitus, heart failure, vitamin E Introduction The majority of U.S. hospitalizations for complications of diabetes are linked to cardiovascular disease (1). Heart failure (HF) is a common and serious comorbidity of diabetes (1, 2). Although the high incidence and poor prognosis of HF in diabetic patients is often explained by the coexistence of hypertension and/or myocardial ischemia, the absence of significant coronary obstructions in a subset of patients with diabetic HF strongly support the existence of an underlying diabetic cardiomyopathy (3–7). Diabetic cardiomyopathy has been found to be associated with depressed mechanical function which results in subclinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction (8, 9). This diabetic cardiomyopathy has been documented to progress to congestive heart failure (CHF) in both type 1 and 2 diabetic patients. However, approximately 30% of all type 1 diabetic patients suffer from this specific cardiomyopathy (10, 11). Despite these observations, no widely applicable treatment regimen has been developed for the prevention of cardiac complications of diabetes. Available evidence from experimental models as well as observational studies have reported that diabetes increases oxidative stress and that the onset of diabetes and its complications, including diabetic cardiomyopathy, are closely associated with oxidative stress (12–17). In most of these studies, increased levels of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and lipid hydroperoxides have been used to establish an association between oxidative stress and diabetic complications. However, the use of these two classic markers of free-radical mediated oxidative stress has been documented to be problematic (18, 19). Consequently, no definitive information as to the importance of this process in vivo in contributing to the functional alterations demonstrated in the hearts of diabetic patients as well as those of experimental animals is available. Vitamin E has been shown to be a potent antioxidant and its presence in biological membranes is thought to represent the major defense system against free-radical mediated lipid peroxidation. Epidemiological studies have shown an inverse correlation between vitamin E intake and cardiovascular disease (20, 21). However, interventional studies in patients have yielded conflicting results, with evidence both for (22–24) and against (25–29) the clinical value of vitamin E. It has recently been suggested that the incongruous results of vitamin E treatment in preventing cardiovascular complications may be due to the lack of identification criteria of patients who are most likely to benefit from antioxidant therapy (30) as well as inappropriate patient selection (31). No clinical trials to date have been performed in which patient enrollment was based on biochemical evidence of elevated oxidative stress. In that regard, persons with diabetes may be more prone to oxidative stress because hyperglycemia depletes natural antioxidants and facilitates the production of free radicals (16). Unfortunately, the vast majority of clinical studies have not been designed to assess the efficacy of vitamin E use specifically in diabetic patients. Thus, it is possible that vitamin E may be more efficacious in subpopulations who exhibit evidence of elevated oxidative stress. Given the number of shortcomings in the clinical trials, the potential of vitamin E to provide protection from myocardial dysfunction in situations of oxidative challenge remains open for further investigation. Accordingly, the present investigation was designed to address these issues. F2-isoprostanes are members of a newly described family of prostaglandin isomers that are produced in vivo primarily from oxidative modification of polyunsaturated fatty acids via a free radical-catalyzed mechanism (32). Of these, 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso PGF2α) has recently been shown to be a specific and sensitive quantitative index of oxidative stress in vivo (33). Therefore, to evaluate myocardial oxidative stress in diabetic cardiac complications, we measured myocardial levels of 8-iso PGF2α along with myocardial oxidized (GSSG) glutathione in relation to left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic function during type I diabetic cardiomyopathy using the well-characterized rat streptozotocin (STZ) model of type I diabetes. To determine whether vitamin E is capable of confering cardioprotective effects against diabetic cardiovascular disease, we supplemented STZ-diabetic rats with vitamin E. The results demonstrate that supplemental vitamin E provides significant protection against cardiac dysfunction and concomitant myocardial oxidative stress induced by type I diabetes. These findings provide evidence of a causal link between myocardial oxidative stress and diabetic cardiac dysfunction and support the use of vitamin E supplements for cardiovascular prevention of type I diabetic complications, especially cardiomyopathy. Methods Experimental Animals Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 150 ± 10 g were obtained from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). All experiments were performed in accordance with the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Meharry Medical College and conforms with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the US National Institutes of Health. Induction of Diabetes Hyperglycemia was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by administering a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of streptozotocin (STZ) (65 mg/kg body wt) prepared daily in citrate buffer pH 4.5 for maximal stability. The control group was injected with the vehicle only. To ensure that the animals were diabetic (D), urine analysis was performed 24–48 hours after STZ injection by Chemstrip uGK (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Rats with urine glucose values of >2000 mg/dL with polyuria 24–48 h after STZ injection were considered to be diabetic. Rats with urine glucose values of <2000 mg/dL 24–48 hours after STZ injection were not considered to be diabetic and were excluded from further study. After hyperglycemia was confirmed 24–48 h after STZ injection with a urine glucose test, the tests were then repeated weekly. All of the rats that were diabetic 24–48 h after STZ injection remained in a diabetic state through to the 8-week endpoint of our study as evidenced by continued urine glucose values of >2000 mg/dL along with polyuria. Vitamin E Supplementation Control and diabetic rats were randomly assigned to a standard rat chow [Rodent Diet (W) 8640] or a chow supplemented with vitamin E (2000 IU of tocopherol acetate/kg of feed) obtained from Teklad (Madison, WI) beginning immediately after confirmation of STZ-induced diabetes. Rats were kept on their respective diets for 8 weeks post-STZ injection so as to allow an adequate period of time for any beneficial effects to be seen. Body weight and average daily food consumption of all groups of rats were measured weekly. Animals were used at eight weeks after vehicle or STZ injection for different studies. Urine glucose values at 8 weeks in the STZ-diabetic rats receiving vitamin E were similar to that observed in the un-supplemented STZ-diabetic rats, indicating that the severity of diabetes was the same between the two groups. Cardiac Function Rats were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine (90 mg/kg:10mg/kg i.p.). The right carotid artery was cannulated with a Millar miniature catheter (SPC-320, 2F, Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas) and advanced into the aorta to record arterial pressure. The aortic catheter was then advanced into the left ventricle (LV) for recording of the following pressures: left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP); left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP); rate of pressure rise (+dP/dt); and rate of pressure decay (−dP/dt). Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was also measured. After these assessments, the rats were killed, and the hearts were removed for further studies. Measurement of Myocardial Oxidative Stress 8-iso PGF2α LV tissue was homogenized in 0.1 M phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM EDTA. An equal volume of 15% wt/vol KOH was added to the tissue homogenate and incubated for 60 minutes at 4°C. 2–4 volumes of ethanol containing 0.01% BHT was added to the sample and incubated for 5 minutes at 4°C and then centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 10 minutes to remove precipitated proteins. The supernatant was then decanted into a clean test tube and the ethanol was evaporated to < 10% v/v under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The samples were then reconstituted with EIA buffer, vortexed, and then analyzed for 8-isoprostane using a commercially available kit (8-Isoprostane EIA Kit, Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI) and expressed as picomoles/g tissue. Reduced and Oxidized Glutathione LV tissue was homogenized in 5–10 ml of cold buffer (i.e., 50 mM MES, pH 6–7, containing 1 mM EDTA) per gram tissue and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C. Reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione levels was examined in the supernatants using a commercially available kit (Glutathione Assay Kit, Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI). Exclusive measurement of GSSG was accomplished by derivatizing GSH with 2-vinylpyridine. Values were expressed as μM/mg tissue. Protein Determination and Statistical Analysis Protein concentration of LV tissue samples were determined using the Modified Lowry Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Pierce Biotechnology). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Group means were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test was used to identify differences between multiple groups. Comparisons between two groups was performed by Student’s t-test. Values of P<0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was done using SigmaStat 3.5 software. Results General Observations STZ-diabetic animals supplemented with and without vitamin E showed a significant decrease in body weight and heart weight compared with controls (Table 1). The results in Table 1 also show an increase in heart/body weight ratio in the STZ-diabetic animals maintained on a basal or vitamin E-supplemented diet compared to respective control animals. The development of diabetes was confirmed by a marked elevation in the urine glucose level (>2000 mg/dl). We chose not to measure blood glucose values as anesthetization is required and this process has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of mortality, particularly in rats that are chronically and severely diabetic, as is the case in the present study.
Food Consumption STZ-diabetic animals supplemented with and without dietary vitamin E displayed an increase in food intake compared to respective control groups of animals at 1-week and 2-weeks post-STZ injection (Figure 1
Ventricular Function LV hemodynamic parameters were measured in vitamin E-supplemented and un-supplemented control and diabetic groups of rats for assessment of ventricular performance. Figure 2
Hemodynamic data are summarized in Table 2. Supplementation of diabetic rats with dietary vitamin E resulted in an improved LVSP, LVEDP, +dP/dt, and MAP as compared to the un-supplemented diabetic rats. The diabetic animals supplemented with dietary vitamin E also showed an increase in −dP/dt as compared to the un-supplemented diabetic group, however, the increase was not statistically significant (Table 2). HR was significantly decreased in both the vitamin E-supplemented and un-supplemented diabetic animals relative to their respective controls (Table 2). These data indicate that vitamin E improves LV systolic and diastolic function in diabetic hearts independent of HR.
Myocardial Oxidative Stress The amount of free-radical mediated oxidative stress was determined by evaluation of myocardial levels of 8-iso PGF2α; these data are shown in Figure 3
Myocardial oxidized (GSSG) glutathione levels were also examined in addition to 8-iso PGF2α to assess oxidative stress. Myocardial GSSG levels in the un-supplemented diabetic animals were significantly increased relative to respective controls (Figure 4
Discussion The excess in-hospital mortality of diabetic patients results primarily from an increased incidence of HF (34). The higher incidence of pump failure among diabetic patients has been attributed in part to an underlying subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy that is unrelated to large-vessel atherosclerosis (4, 34, 35). This unique form of non-atherogenic cardiomyopathy occurs in roughly 30% of all type 1 diabetic patients (10, 11) due to the protracted course of abnormal glucose homeostasis. Although diabetic cardiomyopathy has been reported to be associated with an increase in oxidative stress (12–15), little information is available on the in vivo formation of F2-isoprostanes in diabetic myocardium with attendant cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, no information is available on the effects of vitamin E on myocardial F2-isoprostane formation in diabetic cardiac complications. From a broader perspective, the biological significance of oxidative stress in diabetes and its complications remains poorly understood. The present study, performed using the STZ-diabetic rat model of type I non-atherogenic cardiomyopathy, provides significant new information that is relevant to diabetic cardiac complications. The salient results can be summarized as follows: (1) in STZ rats with type I diabetic cardiomyopathy, myocardial levels of 8-iso PGF2α and GSSG are significantly increased, a reflection of increased oxidative stress; (2) supplementation of STZ-diabetic rats with 2000 IU of vitamin E/kg food provides significant protection against diabetes-induced cardiac dysfunction; (3) vitamin E blunts diabetes-induced amplification of myocardial 8-iso PGF2α and GSSG formation; and (4) excess myocardial oxidative stress is causally related to the development of type I diabetic cardiomyopathy. Taken together, these data demonstrate a causal role for oxidative stress in mediating the pathogenesis of type I diabetic cardiomyopathy and support antioxidant intervention with vitamin E as a cardioprotective strategy in the setting of type I diabetes. Our results strengthen the concept of oxidative stress of hyperglycemia as a potential mechanism for diabetic cardiac complications. In the present study, we found myocardial levels of 8-iso PGF2α to be increased in the LV of un-supplemented diabetic rats 8 weeks after STZ injection. The increased formation of myocardial 8-iso PGF2α among the un-supplemented STZ-diabetic animals was associated with significant depressions in LVSP, +dP/dt, and −dP/dt and concomitant increases in LVEDP. These hemodynamic alterations in the un-supplemented STZ-diabetic rats demonstrate abnormal LV systolic and diastolic function that is the hallmark of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Interventional experiments involving the antioxidant vitamin E attenuated these hemodynamic changes and significantly depressed myocardial 8-iso PGF2α in the STZ-diabetic rats. To our knowledge, it has not previously been shown that vitamin E supplementation can significantly affect diabetes-induced accentuation of specific F2-isoprostanes, such as 8-iso PGF2α, in the hearts of STZ-diabetic rats. These findings provide strong evidence of a causative role for myocardial oxidative stress in the development of type I diabetic cardiomyopathy. The significantly lower HR observed in untreated STZ-diabetic rats in the present study is in agreement with previous findings from the literature (36–40). It is known that reductions in HR are routinely associated with cardiac depression. However, studies undertaking functional comparison at comparable heart rates via pacing in STZ-diabetic rats have reported similar alterations in myocardial contractility despite correcting for HR (41, 42). Therefore, the hemodynamic assessment of untreated STZ-diabetic rats in the present study demonstrates that the cardiomyopathy of this pathophysiological condition is characterized by myocardial contractile dysfunction. Apart from being a sensitive index of oxidative stress, 8-iso PGF2α generated during this process may wield potent vasoconstrictor effects on coronary arteries (43). Therefore, in the present study, we cannot exclude the possibility that this mechanism may be responsible, at least in part, for the decreased cardiac performance observed among the STZ-diabetic animals. We postulate that this may occur through a decrease in subendocardial blood flow. Although the biological effects of 8-iso PGF2α suggest that it may act as a mediator of the cellular effects of oxidative stress, a functional role for isoprostanes in cardiac complications of diabetes remains to be established. Clinical trials examining the use of antioxidants specifically in patients with diabetes is limited. The HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) trial (26) and the MICRO-HOPE (44), a sub-study of the HOPE trial, were the two largest trials conducted thus far to investigate the effects of antioxidants on cardiovascular events in diabetic patients. No cardiovascular benefits for vitamin E in patients with diabetes was found in either trial. The failure of these clinical studies to demonstrate any benefit of vitamin E in preventing cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients is multifactorial. First, there were no measurements using any of the commonly accepted biomarkers to substantiate that oxidative stress was decreased in these studies to an appropriate degree. Second, the human trials to date used endpoints that were not directly related to oxidative stress, but rather gross markers of overall cardiovascular health, such as effect on mortality (45). Finally, these clinical studies included older patients (average age 65.4 years) with established coronary artery disease. It has been suggested that the study populations represented patients in whom the disease states had progressed too far to be amenable to antioxidant intervention (45). A positive effect in an experimental study, such as ours, is most likely due to vitamin E supplementation as a prophylactic treatment (loading the animals with vitamin E before the onset of diabetic cardiovascular disease). In the HOPE (26) and MICRO-HOPE substudy (44), the supplementation was initiated after the clinical diagnosis. In an effort to determine whether longer duration of vitamin E treatment would prevent cardiovascular disease, the HOPE study was extended (HOPE-The Ongoing Outcomes [HOPE-TOO]) roughly 2.5 years beyond it’s previously reported (26) 4.5-year mean follow-up. The HOPE-TOO trial investigators actually demonstrated an increased incidence of HF in patients assigned to vitamin E (46). This paradox may be explained by considering that HOPE-TOO study patients had preexisting coronary or peripheral artery disease, stroke, or diabetes mellitus plus at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. Since atherosclerotic vascular disease has been associated with an increase in oxidative stress (31), diabetes mellitus and vasculopathy is a potent combined risk factor for synergistic increases in oxidative stress in these individuals. As a result, these patients were at very high risk for extreme elevations in systemic oxidative stress. The recognition of the ability of vitamin E to become a pro-oxidant in a highly oxidative milieu (47) together with it’s prolonged administration to HOPE-TOO study patients with known vascular disease and diabetes mellitus may collectively have precluded it’s antioxidative effects and instead promoted extensive oxidative modification, thereby depressing myocardial function with resultant excess HF. The findings from the HOPE-TOO trial coupled with the beneficial effects of vitamin E supplementation on diabetic cardiomyopathy observed in the present study suggest that the cardioprotective effects of vitamin E may be specific to diabetes mellitus alone, where milder myocardial oxidative stress conditions prevail (48). Although the present study does not directly address the mechanism by which vitamin E modulates the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy, the fact that vitamin E-supplemented diabetic rats had reduced oxidative stress and an enhanced hemodynamic functioning suggests that the protection afforded by vitamin E may be attributable, in part, to its antioxidant properties. Vitamin E is a lipid-soluble, naturally occurring antioxidant and its presence in biological membranes is thought to represent the major defense system against peroxidation of lipid components. Because vitamin E supplementation produced a reduction in myocardial oxidative stress, its beneficial effect may be due to a combination of its direct antioxidant properties as well as exerting a sparing effect on the remaining myocardial enzymatic antioxidants. A protective mechanism of vitamin E independent of its direct free radical scavenging effect may also exist. Vitamin E has been shown to decrease platelet adhesion and aggregation (49), promote the inhibition of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors (50), and inhibit the production of nitric oxide (51). These operative mechanisms of action may explain why the use of vitamin E in primary prevention of coronary artery disease has been successful (20, 21). Much of the diastolic dysfunction in diabetes has been attributed to the formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGE’s). A common consequence of their formation is covalent cross-link formation with proteins such as collagen which decrease the compliance of the extracellular matrix (ECM) (52, 53). In the myocardium, this may lead to ventricular stiffness (54, 55) with resultant impaired diastolic function. Increased activation of the diacylglycerol (DAG)-protein kinase C (PKC) signal transduction pathway has been shown in hearts of STZ-diabetic animals (56) and activation of this pathway has been documented as a mechanism linking AGE’s to diabetic complications (57, 58). Inhibition of hyperglycemia-induced PKC activation has been reported to produce significant improvements in cardiac dysfunction (59, 60). In that regard, vitamin E has been identified to normalize DAG-PKC activation induced by hyperglycemia (61, 62). It is possible that this mechanism may be responsible, at least in part, for the prevention of diastolic dysfunction seen among the STZ-diabetic rats treated with vitamin E in the present study. However, further investigations are needed to verify this hypothesis. It is important to note that although vitamin E has not been shown in multiple clinical studies to retard the progression of HF (26, 44, 46, 63), all of these studies were performed in patients with established atherosclerotic heart disease and thus it is likely that these individuals HF was of ischemic origin. In contrast, the HF observed in the STZ-diabetic rats in the present study was a result of non-atherogenic cardiomyopathy. These differences in HF etiology are extremely important as vitamin E has been reported to be less effective in mitigating pathophysiological processes related to atherosclerosis as compared to other antioxidants, such as ascorbate (vitamin C) (64). These aspects may partly substantiate the failure of interventional studies using vitamin E supplementation to demonstrate any benefit in preventing HF in patients with advanced coronary artery disease. Although possible confounding effects of STZ cannot be excluded, the half-life of the drug is ~15 minutes, and it is cleared from the organs within 4 hours (65). Since the present study was conducted at such a late period after STZ treatment (8 weeks post-STZ injection), the results reported herein are likely related to the development of diabetes. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate increased myocardial formation of 8-iso PGF2α and GSSG in association with type I diabetic cardiomyopathy. Dietary supplementation with vitamin E was sufficient to reduce myocardial 8-iso PGF2α and GSSG levels which resulted in significant protection against cardiac dysfunction induced by type I diabetes. These findings in experimental animals provide compelling evidence in favor of a causal role for myocardial oxidative stress in mediating the pathogenesis of type I diabetic cardiomyopathy. Data obtained in experimental animals must obviously be extrapolated to the clinical arena with caution. Nevertheless, the present findings suggest that vitamin E and other antioxidants may confer cardiovascular benefit in select patients who are diabetic and in greater oxidative stress. Indeed, support for this paradigm has recently been demonstrated in a retrospective analysis of the HOPE study where vitamin E administration to diabetic individuals homozygous for the haptoglobin 2 allele, which confers markedly less antioxidant protection against hemoglobin-induced oxidation (66), was shown to result in a 50% reduction in non-fatal MI and cardiovascular death (67). In all the large scale clinical trials that have examined the effect of antioxidants in diabetes, people with long-standing diabetes (>10 years) and at high risk for cardiovascular events were targeted (26, 44). We suggest that it might be fruitful to re-explore the role of antioxidant therapy given immediately after the diagnosis of type I diabetes mellitus to reduce the risk of future cardiovascular complications. Acknowledgments This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants NIH NCRR G12 RR03032-17 and NIH/NIGMS 2 S06 GM08037-32 (M.F.H.) and by NIH/NIDDK predoctoral fellowship award F31 DK061284 (M. H.). Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References 1. Bell DS. Heart failure: the frequent, forgotten, and often fatal complication of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2433–41. [PubMed] 2. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241:2035–8. [PubMed] 3. Rubler S, Dlugash J, Yuceoglu YZ, Kumral T, Branwood AW, Grishman A. New type of cardiomyopathy associated with diabetic glomerulosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 1972;30:595–602. [PubMed] 4. Zarich SW, Nesto RW. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 1989;118:1000–12. [PubMed] 5. Hayat SA, Patel B, Khattar RS, Malik RA. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Sci. 2004;107:539–57. [PubMed] 6. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:29–34. [PubMed] 7. Galderisi M, Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Levy D. Echocardiographic evidence for the existence of a distinct diabetic cardiomyopathy (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:85–9. [PubMed] 8. Ganguly PK, Pierce GN, Dhalla KS, Dhalla NS. Defective sarcoplasmic reticular calcium transport in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol. 1983;244:E528–35. [PubMed] 9. Giacomelli F, Wiener J. Primary myocardial disease in the diabetic mouse. An ultrastructural study Lab Invest. 1979;40:460–73. 10. Fein FS, Sonnenblick EH. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985;27:255–70. [PubMed] 11. Jarrett RJ. Cardiovascular disease and hypertension in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1989;5:547–58. [PubMed] 12. Kaul N, Siveski-Iliskovic N, Hill M, Khaper N, Seneviratne C, Singal PK. Probucol treatment reverses antioxidant and functional deficit in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996;160–161:283–8. 13. Nishio Y, Kashiwagi A, Taki H, Shinozaki K, Maeno Y, Kojima H, et al. Altered activities of transcription factors and their related gene expression in cardiac tissues of diabetic rats. Diabetes. 1998;47:1318–25. [PubMed] 14. Liang Q, Carlson EC, Do nthi RV, Kralik PM, Shen X, Epstein PN. Overexpression of metallothionein reduces diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes. 2002;51:174–81. [PubMed] 15. Cai L, Kang YJ. Oxidative stress and diabetic cardiomyopathy: a brief review. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2001;1:181–93. [PubMed] 16. Penckofer S, Schwertz D, Florczak K. Oxidative stress and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: the role of antioxidants and pro-oxidants. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002;6:68–85. [PubMed] 17. Marra G, Cotroneo P, Pitocco D, Manto A, Di Leo MA, Ruotolo V, et al. Early increase of oxidative stress and reduced antioxidant defenses in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes: a case for gender difference. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:370–5. [PubMed] 18. Gutteridge JM, Halliwell B. The measurement and mechanism of lipid peroxidation in biological systems. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990;15:129–35. [PubMed] 19. Janero DR. Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;9:515–40. [PubMed] 20. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease in men. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1450–6. [PubMed] 21. Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1444–9. [PubMed] 22. Boaz M, Smetana S, Weinstein T, Matas Z, Gafter U, Iaina A, et al. Secondary prevention with antioxidants of cardiovascular disease in endstage renal disease (SPACE): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1213–8. [PubMed] 23. Stephens NG, Parsons A, Schofield PM, Kelly F, Cheeseman K, Mitchinson MJ. Randomised controlled trial of vitamin E in patients with coronary disease: Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS). Lancet. 1996;347:781–6. [PubMed] 24. Singh RB, Niaz MA, Rastogi SS, Rastogi S. Usefulness of antioxidant vitamins in suspected acute myocardial infarction (the Indian experiment of infarct survival-3). Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:232–6. [PubMed] 25. Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico. Lancet. 1999;354:447–55. [PubMed] 26. Yusuf S, Dagenais G, Pogue J, Bosch J, Sleight P. Vitamin E supplementation and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:154–60. [PubMed] 27. Lee IM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, et al. Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: the Women’s Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:56–65. [PubMed] 28. Salonen JT, Nyyssonen K, Salonen R, Lakka HM, Kaikkonen J, Porkkala-Sarataho E, et al. Antioxidant Supplementation in Atherosclerosis Prevention (ASAP) study: a randomized trial of the effect of vitamins E and C on 3-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis. J Intern Med. 2000;248:377–86. [PubMed] 29. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, Mahrer PR, Sevanian A, Liu CR, et al. VEAPS Research Group: Alpha-tocopherol supplementation in healthy individuals reduces low-density lipoprotein oxidation but not atherosclerosis: the Vitamin E Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (VEAPS). Circulation. 2002;106:1453–9. [PubMed] 30. Violi F, Cangemi R, Sabatino G, Pignatelli P. Vitamin E for the treatment of cardiovascular disease: is there a future? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1031:292–304. [PubMed] 31. Levy AP. Application of pharmacogenomics in the prevention of diabetic cardiovascular disease: mechanistic basis and clinical evidence for utilization of the haptoglobin genotype in determining benefit from antioxidant therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112:501–12. [PubMed] 32. Morrow JD, Hill KE, Burk RF, Nammour TM, Badr KF, Roberts LJ., 2nd A series of prostaglandin F2-like compounds are produced in vivo in humans by a non- cyclooxygenase, free radical-catalyzed mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:9383–7. [PubMed] 33. Delanty N, Reilly MP, Pratico D, Lawson JA, McCarthy JF, Wood AE, et al. 8-epi PGF2 alpha generation during coronary reperfusion. A potential quantitative marker of oxidant stress in vivo. Circulation. 1997;95:2492–9. [PubMed] 34. Aronson D, Rayfield EJ, Chesebro JH. Mechanisms determining course and outcome of diabetic patients who have had acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:296–306. [PubMed] 35. Stone PH, Muller JE, Hartwell T, York BJ, Rutherford JD, Parker CB, et al. The effect of diabetes mellitus on prognosis and serial left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction: contribution of both coronary disease and left ventricular dysfunction to the adverse prognosis. The MILIS Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:49–57. [PubMed] 36. Maeda CY, Fernandes TG, Timm HB, Irigoyen MC. Autonomic dysfunction in short- term experimental diabetes. Hypertension. 1995;26:1100–4. [PubMed] 37. Hicks KK, Seifen E, Stimers JR, Kennedy RH. Effects of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac autonomic nervous control. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1998;69:21–30. [PubMed] 38. Sakamoto J, Barr RL, Kavanagh KM, Lopaschuk GD. Contribution of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase to the high fatty acid oxidation rates seen in the diabetic heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H1196–1204. [PubMed] 39. Nagareddy PR, Xia Z, MacLeod KM, McNeill JH. N-acetylcysteine prevents nitrosative stress-associated depression of blood pressure and heart rate in streptozotocin diabetic rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;47:513–20. [PubMed] 40. Borges GR, de Oliveira M, Salgado HC, Fazan R., Jr Myocardial performance in conscious streptozotocin diabetic rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2006;5:26. [PubMed] 41. Banyasz T, Kalapos I, Kelemen SZ, Kovacs T. Changes in cardiac contractility in IDDM and NIDDM diabetic rats. Gen Physiol Biophys. 1996;15:357–69. [PubMed] 42. Banyasz T, Kovacs T. Altered [3H]ouabain binding to cardiac muscle in insulin- dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetic rats. Exp Physiol. 1998;83:65–76. [PubMed] 43. Kromer BM, Tippins JR. Coronary artery constriction by the isoprostane 8-epi prostaglandin F2 alpha. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;119:1276–80. [PubMed] 44. Lonn E, Yusuf S, Hoogwerf B, Pogue J, Yi Q, Zinman B, et al. HOPE Study; MICRO-HOPE Study: Effects of vitamin E on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in high-risk patients with diabetes: results of the HOPE study and MICRO- HOPE substudy. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1919–27. [PubMed] 45. Johansen JS, Harris AK, Rychly DJ, Ergul A. Oxidative stress and the use of antioxidants in diabetes: linking basic science to clinical practice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2005;4:5. [PubMed] 46. Lonn E, Bosch J, Yusuf S, Sheridan P, Pogue J, Arnold JM, et al. HOPE and HOPE-TOO Trial Investigators. Effects of long-term vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular events and cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:1338–47. [PubMed] 47. Bowry VW, Ingold KU, Stocker R. Vitamin E in human low-density lipoprotein. When and how this antioxidant becomes a pro-oxidant. Biochem J. 1992;288:341–4. [PubMed] 48. Smith HM, Hamblin M, Hill MF. Greater propensity of diabetic myocardium for oxidative stress after myocardial infarction is associated with the development of heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;39:657–65. [PubMed] 49. Steiner M. Influence of vitamin E on platelet function in humans. J Am Coll Nutr. 1991;10:466–73. [PubMed] 50. Dowd P, Zheng ZB. On the mechanism of the anticlotting action of vitamin E quinone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:8171–5. [PubMed] 51. Boulanger CM, Tanner FC, Bea ML, Hahn AW, Werner A, Luscher TF. Oxidized low density lipoproteins induce mRNA expression and release of endothelin from human and porcine endothelium. Circ Res. 1992;70:1191–7. [PubMed] 52. Singh R, Barden A, Mori T, Beilin L. Advanced glycation end-products: a review. Diabetologia. 2001;44:129–46. [PubMed] 53. Brownlee M. Negative consequences of glycation. Metabolism. 2000;49:9–13. [PubMed] 54. Bell DS. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. A unique entity or a complication of coronary artery disease? Diabetes Care. 1995;18:708–14. [PubMed] 55. Spiro MJ, Crowley TJ. Increased rat myocardial type VI collagen in diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Diabetologia. 1993;36:93–8. [PubMed] 56. Inoguchi T, Battan R, Handler E, Sportsman JR, Heath W, King GL. Preferential elevation of protein kinase C isoform beta II and diacylglycerol levels in the aorta and heart of diabetic rats: differential reversibility to glycemic control by islet cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:11059–63. [PubMed] 57. Way KJ, Katai N, King GL. Protein kinase C and the development of diabetic vascular complications. Diabet Med. 2001;18:945–59. [PubMed] 58. Mamputu JC, Renier G. Advanced glycation end products increase, through a protein kinase C-dependent pathway, vascular endothelial growth factor expression in retinal endothelial cells. Inhibitory effect of gliclazide. J Diabetes Complications. 2002;16:284–93. [PubMed] 59. Wakasaki H, Koya D, Schoen FJ, Jirousek MR, Ways DK, Hoit BD, et al. Targeted overexpression of protein kinase C beta2 isoform in myocardium causes cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:9320–5. [PubMed] 60. Takeishi Y, Chu G, Kirkpatrick DM, Li Z, Wakasaki H, Kranias EG, et al. In vivo phosphorylation of cardiac troponin I by protein kinase Cbeta2 decreases cardiomyocyte calcium responsiveness and contractility in transgenic mouse hearts. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:72–8. [PubMed] 61. Kunisaki M, Fumio U, Nawata H, King GL. Vitamin E normalizes diacylglycerol- protein kinase C activation induced by hyperglycemia in rat vascular tissues. Diabetes. 1996;45:S117–9. [PubMed] 62. Kunisaki M, Bursell SE, Umeda F, Nawata H, King GL. Normalization of diacylglycerol-protein kinase C activation by vitamin E in aorta of diabetic rats and cultured rat smooth muscle cells exposed to elevated glucose levels. Diabetes. 1994;43:1372–7. [PubMed] 63. Marchioli R, Levantesi G, Macchia A, Marfisi RM, Nicolosi GL, Tavazzi L, et al. GISSI-Prevenzione Investigators. Vitamin E increases the risk of developing heart failure after myocardial infarction: Results from the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. J Cardiovasc Med. 2006;7:347–50. 64. Carr AC, Zhu BZ, Frei B. Potential antiatherogenic mechanisms of ascorbate (vitamin C) and alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E). Circ Res. 2000;87:349–54. [PubMed] 65. Adolphe AB, Glasofer ED, Troetel WM, Weiss AJ, Manthei RW. Preliminary pharmacokinetics of streptozotocin, an antineoplastic antibiotic. J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;17:379–88. [PubMed] 66. Asleh R, Guetta J, Kalet-Litman S, Miller-Lotan R, Levy AP. Haptoglobin genotype- and diabetes-dependent differences in iron-mediated oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo. Circ Res. 2005;96:435–41. [PubMed] 67. Levy AP, Gerstein HC, Miller-Lotan R, Ratner R, McQueen M, Lonn E, et al. The effect of vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular risk in diabetic individuals with different haptoglobin phenotypes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2767. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug; 26(8):2433-41.
[Diabetes Care. 2003]JAMA. 1979 May 11; 241(19):2035-8.
[JAMA. 1979]Am J Cardiol. 1972 Nov 8; 30(6):595-602.
[Am J Cardiol. 1972]Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jul 1; 68(1):85-9.
[Am J Cardiol. 1991]Am J Physiol. 1983 Jun; 244(6):E528-35.
[Am J Physiol. 1983]Diabetes Care. 2002 Feb; 25(2):370-5.
[Diabetes Care. 2002]Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 Apr; 15(4):129-35.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1990]Free Radic Biol Med. 1990; 9(6):515-40.
[Free Radic Biol Med. 1990]N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20; 328(20):1450-6.
[N Engl J Med. 1993]N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20; 328(20):1444-9.
[N Engl J Med. 1993]Lancet. 2000 Oct 7; 356(9237):1213-8.
[Lancet. 2000]Am J Cardiol. 1996 Feb 1; 77(4):232-6.
[Am J Cardiol. 1996]Lancet. 1999 Aug 7; 354(9177):447-55.
[Lancet. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec; 87(23):9383-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]Circulation. 1997 Jun 3; 95(11):2492-9.
[Circulation. 1997]Ann Intern Med. 1997 Feb 15; 126(4):296-306.
[Ann Intern Med. 1997]Am Heart J. 1989 Nov; 118(5 Pt 1):1000-12.
[Am Heart J. 1989]J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Jul; 14(1):49-57.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989]Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985 Jan-Feb; 27(4):255-70.
[Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985]Diabetes Metab Rev. 1989 Nov; 5(7):547-58.
[Diabetes Metab Rev. 1989]Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug; 26(8):2433-41.
[Diabetes Care. 2003]JAMA. 1979 May 11; 241(19):2035-8.
[JAMA. 1979]Am J Cardiol. 1972 Nov 8; 30(6):595-602.
[Am J Cardiol. 1972]Am Heart J. 1989 Nov; 118(5 Pt 1):1000-12.
[Am Heart J. 1989]Hypertension. 1995 Dec; 26(6 Pt 2):1100-4.
[Hypertension. 1995]Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2006 Dec 4; 5():26.
[Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2006]Gen Physiol Biophys. 1996 Oct; 15(5):357-69.
[Gen Physiol Biophys. 1996]Exp Physiol. 1998 Jan; 83(1):65-76.
[Exp Physiol. 1998]Br J Pharmacol. 1996 Nov; 119(6):1276-80.
[Br J Pharmacol. 1996]N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20; 342(3):154-60.
[N Engl J Med. 2000]Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov; 25(11):1919-27.
[Diabetes Care. 2002]Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2005 Apr 29; 4(1):5.
[Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2005]N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20; 342(3):154-60.
[N Engl J Med. 2000]JAMA. 2005 Mar 16; 293(11):1338-47.
[JAMA. 2005]Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Nov; 112(2):501-12.
[Pharmacol Ther. 2006]Biochem J. 1992 Dec 1; 288 ( Pt 2)():341-4.
[Biochem J. 1992]J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005 Oct; 39(4):657-65.
[J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005]J Am Coll Nutr. 1991 Oct; 10(5):466-73.
[J Am Coll Nutr. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29; 92(18):8171-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Circ Res. 1992 Jun; 70(6):1191-7.
[Circ Res. 1992]N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20; 328(20):1450-6.
[N Engl J Med. 1993]N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20; 328(20):1444-9.
[N Engl J Med. 1993]Diabetologia. 2001 Feb; 44(2):129-46.
[Diabetologia. 2001]Metabolism. 2000 Feb; 49(2 Suppl 1):9-13.
[Metabolism. 2000]Diabetes Care. 1995 May; 18(5):708-14.
[Diabetes Care. 1995]Diabetologia. 1993 Feb; 36(2):93-8.
[Diabetologia. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15; 89(22):11059-63.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20; 342(3):154-60.
[N Engl J Med. 2000]Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov; 25(11):1919-27.
[Diabetes Care. 2002]JAMA. 2005 Mar 16; 293(11):1338-47.
[JAMA. 2005]Circ Res. 2000 Sep 1; 87(5):349-54.
[Circ Res. 2000]J Clin Pharmacol. 1977 Jul; 17(7):379-88.
[J Clin Pharmacol. 1977]Circ Res. 2005 Mar 4; 96(4):435-41.
[Circ Res. 2005]Diabetes Care. 2004 Nov; 27(11):2767.
[Diabetes Care. 2004]N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20; 342(3):154-60.
[N Engl J Med. 2000]Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov; 25(11):1919-27.
[Diabetes Care. 2002]