![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oligomeric Structure and Functional Characterization of the Urea Transporter from Actinobacillus pleuropneunomiae 1Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 2Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115 3Howard Hughes Medical Institute 5Address correspondence to: Thomas Walz, Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, Email: twalz/at/hms.harvard.edu 4Current address: Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, 44227 Dortmund, Germany The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at J Mol Biol.Abstract Urea transporters facilitate urea permeation across cell membranes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Bacteria use urea either as a means to survive in acidic environments and/or as a nitrogen source. The urea transporter ApUT from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, the pathogen that causes porcine pleurisy and pneumonia, was expressed in E. coli and purified. Analysis of the recombinant protein using cross-linking and blue-native gel electrophoresis established that ApUT is a dimer in detergent solution. To determine the urea transport kinetics of ApUT, purified protein was reconstituted into proteoliposomes, and urea efflux was measured by stopped-flow fluorometry. The measured urea flux was saturable, could be inhibited by phloretin, and was not affected by pH. Two-dimensional crystals of the biologically active ApUT show that it is also dimeric in a lipid membrane and provide the first structural information on a member of the urea transporter family. Keywords: Urea transporter, oligomeric state, ApUT, Channel, 2D crystallization Introduction Urea is the main catabolite in mammals, which excrete it as waste product in their urine and feces. In the mammalian kidney, urea plays an important role in urine formation. Meanwhile, the ubiquitous urea molecule represents an important nitrogen source for many microorganisms. Urea is thus transported in and out of a variety of cells. Although biological membranes are permeable to urea, a number of mechanisms have evolved that facilitate urea transport across membranes. Besides porins 1, which form rather unspecific membrane pores, and secondary 2; 3 and ATP binding cassette transporters 4, which transport urea actively across membranes, there are three membrane protein families whose members facilitate urea transport in a channel-like manner. These are the urea/amide channel (UAC) family 5, the urea transporter (UT) family 6, and the aquaporin (AQP) family 7. Channels of the AQP family conduct mainly water; but a subfamily, the aquaglyceroporins, are also permeable to small, uncharged solutes such as urea and glycerol 8. The proteins of the UAC family facilitate transport of urea and short-chain aliphatic amides across membranes 9. Channels of the UAC family are only found in bacteria. The best-studied member of the UAC family is UreI from Helicobacter pylori, a 21.7-kDa protein with six putative transmembrane segments. Urea uptake through UreI and subsequent conversion of urea into NH3 and CO2 by urease allow H. pylori to buffer its periplasmic pH and hence enable it to survive in highly acidic environments such as the stomach 10. The UT family is divided into three classes: the renal tubular type of urea transporters UT-A1-6, which in humans are expressed by alternative splicing of the Slc14A2 gene11; the erythrocyte urea transporter UT-B1, which in humans is encoded by the Slc14A1 gene12; and the bacterial urea transporters. All members of the UT family are found only in animals (only vertebrates) or pathogenic bacteria, with no representation in the other eukaryotic kingdoms or in the archaeal domain 13. Hydropathy plots predict 10 transmembrane segments for UT-A2-6, UT-B1 and bacterial UTs including ApUT, which range in molecular weight from 35 to 55 kDa. UT-A1, a ~110-kDa protein, has 20 predicted transmembrane segments, suggesting that it resulted from a gene duplication 13. The role of bacterial UACs such as UreI from H. pylori has been established, but the role of UTs, which are expressed by bacteria residing in non-acidic environments, remains to be elucidated. All bacteria that express UTs are pathogens that first have to pass through the highly acidic environment of the stomach to reach their final destination in the intestine or other organs. It has therefore been proposed that the bacterial UTs may serve a similar function in these pathogenic bacteria as UreI in H. pylori 14. Here, we report the structural and functional characterization of the urea transporter ApUT from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, the pathogen that causes porcine pleurisy and pneumonia. Recombinant ApUT was purified and reconstituted into proteoliposomes, which were used to determine the urea transport kinetics of ApUT by stopped-flow fluorometry. The measured urea flux was saturable, could be inhibited by phloretin, and was not affected by pH. Several methods established that ApUT is a dimer in detergent solution, and two-dimensional crystals of the transporter showed that it also exists as a dimer when embedded in a lipid bilayer. Results Purification and oligomeric state of ApUT in detergent solution Several detergents were tested for solubilization and purification of recombinant ApUT. Dodecyl-ß,D-maltoside (DDM) proved to be the best detergent in keeping the protein stable in solution and was used for all further experiments. After Ni-NTA affinity and gel filtration chromatography, the protein was >95% pure as judged by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining (Fig. 1A
SDS-PAGE analysis of purified ApUT showed a strong monomer band at ~34 kDa (Fig. 1A
To confirm that the ApUT dimer seen on the SDS-PAGE gel after cross-linking was not an artifact and that the dimer is the highest oligomer formed by ApUT in DDM, we performed blue-native gel electrophoresis, which showed a strong band at ~120 kDa (Fig. 2B Two-dimensional (2D) crystals of ApUT 2D crystallization trials of ApUT were carried out in various buffer conditions and different lipid environments. The channel incorporated into membranes with all tested lipids, but 2D crystals only formed in DMPC and DOPC membranes at a lipid-to-protein ratio of 0.5 at a protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. ApUT formed crystalline sheets that typically grew out of clustered proteoliposomes and tended to form multilayered stacks. The salt concentration (50 – 500 mM NaCl) and pH (4-9) of the dialysis buffer were varied. The salt concentration did not affect 2D crystallization, but crystals only formed in a pH range of 6-7. Addition of divalent cations (Mg2+ or Ca2+) did not improve the crystal order or size. The crystals exhibited a tetragonal lattice (Fig. 3A - C
Reconstituted ApUT exhibits specific urea transport To determine whether the recombinant ApUT protein forms a functional urea channel, the purified protein was reconstituted into preformed E. coli polar lipid vesicles, and urea permeability was measured by stopped-flow fluorometry. Proteoliposomes and control vesicles, preloaded with 5,6-carboxyfluoresceine (CF) and urea, were rapidly mixed with urea-free isoosmotic buffer. Urea efflux and concomitant shrinkage of the vesicles was measured by CF self-quenching 17. The urea permeability coefficient of ApUT proteoliposomes was ~33 times higher (2.62 ± 0.37 × 10-5 cm/s) than that of the vesicles lacking the urea transporter (0.08 ± 0.015 × 10-5 cm/s) (Fig. 4A, B
To test the specificity of the transporter for urea, we measured permeabilities of several urea analogs, methyl urea: 1,2-dimethyl urea, and acetamide, as well as glycerol (Fig. 4D Water permeability of ApUT was measured by monitoring the volume change of proteoliposomes and control vesicles subjected to a doubled external osmotic pressure. The osmotic water permeability coefficient of proteoliposomes (0.90 ± 0.0076 × 10-2 cm/s) was ~1.6 times higher than that of control vesicles (0.56 ± 0.027 × 10-2 cm/s), indicating that ApUT is permeable to water (Fig. 4E Urea concentration dependence of ApUT mediated urea permeation To determine the half-saturation concentration for ApUT-mediated urea permeation (K1/2), we measured urea permeability of liposomes at different urea concentrations (Fig. 5A
Discussion Experimental determination of the molecular mass of a membrane protein oligomer is not as straightforward as it is for a soluble protein, because membrane proteins are either embedded in a lipid bilayer or otherwise surrounded by a detergent micelle. Blue-native gel electrophoresis and cross-linking are two methods that have previously been used to determine the oligomeric state of detergent-solubilized membrane proteins 15; 18; 19; 20; 21. Here, we used both methods to show that the prokaryotic urea transporter ApUT is a dimer in detergent solution. While cross-linking stabilized some, but not all, of the ApUT dimers (Fig. 2A Even if ApUT exists as a dimer in the membrane, this observation does not imply that oligomerization is required for urea transport. Although the monomers are the functional units, dimeric association has been reported, for example, for the bacterial ClC chloride channel 23 and the bacterial protein translocation complex SecYEG 24. Similarly, aquaporins are only stable as tetramers, although each subunit forms an independent water pore 25. In contrast, oligomerization is essential for K+ channels to form a central ion conduction channel 26. The question thus arises whether dimerization is required for ApUT to form a urea conducting channel or whether each subunit forms an independent channel. Because of the limited resolution, our projection map does not provide an answer to this question. However, hydropathy analysis suggests that the sequences of the N- and C-terminal halves of UTs are related, with each half consisting of five membrane-spanning domains and the two halves being connected by a hydrophilic extracellular loop 27. It has been suggested that this topology arose from a gene duplication of a five transmembrane domain segment early in the evolutionary history of these genes 13. The largest urea transporter, UT-A1, has 20 transmembrane segments and may thus have evolved by an additional gene duplication 28. This situation is reminiscent of some ion channels. Ca2+ and Na+ channels are monomers containing four internal repeats, and are thought to have evolved from K+ channels, which form homo-tetrameric channels, through two gene duplications 29. It is therefore tempting to speculate that analogous to ion channels, UTs may contain a central urea channel that is either formed by the four repeats in UT-A1 or, in the case of all other UTs, by two monomers coming together and each contributing half of the channel. Mutational and further structural studies will be needed, however, to resolve the question of whether UTs must oligomerize to form a channel or whether each subunit in the oligomer forms an independent urea pathway. The urea efflux observed by stopped-flow measurements demonstrates that recombinant ApUT forms functional channels upon reconstitution into liposomes. Urea transport was abolished by phloretin, proving that the transporter is specific for urea with a small permeability for water. It was found that urease activity is needed to establish A. pleuropneumoniae infection in the respiratory tract of pigs 30, suggesting that it may use a similar survival mechanism as that of H. pylori. The urea channel of H. pylori, UreI, is pH-gated and opens at low pH (below ~6.5). Urea permeates through the channel and is converted into NH3 and CO2 by urease inside the bacteria. Ammonia diffuses to the periplasm and therefore buffers this space. However, unlike UreI from H. pylori, which belongs to the urea/amide channel family and is thus distinct from the UTs, our data show that urea transport mediated by ApUT does not change in the pH range of pH 5 – 7.5. This characteristic has also been found for urea transport mediated by other prokaryotic and eukaryotic UTs 31; 32 and thus seems to be conserved in the UT family. Nevertheless, the UT from Y. pseudotuberculosis, Yut, can substitute the function of UreI, as the urea uptake ability is restored in a UreI-deficient H. pylori strain transcomplemented with yut 14. Glycerol and urea analogs such as 1,2-dimethyl urea and acetamide did not permeate ApUT. Methyl urea permeability, however, was ~2.7 times higher compared to control vesicles, and ApUT is also permeable to water. Results from other studies performed on eukaryotic UTs differ. Transport studies on purified plasma membranes from Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing UT-A2 and UT-A3 revealed that these transporters neither permeate any urea analogs, including methyl urea, nor water 33. UT-B expressed in erythrocytes, however, showed high permeabilities for acetamide and methyl urea 34 as well as water 35. ApUT, which shares 26% and 21% identical and 44% and 45% similar residues with UT-A2 and UT-B, respectively, seems to be more specific than UT-B but less specific than UT-As. The permeability of urea analogs through ApUT decreases with the molecular size of the compound (urea < methyl urea < 1.2-dimethyl urea). Since acetamide, with a size comparable to that of urea, is not transported by ApUT, the presence of two amide groups seems to be another selection criterion of the transporter. It is surprising that UT-As are impermeable to water, because the high polarity and water solubility of urea suggests that a polar, hydrophilic conduit would best facilitate transmembrane urea transport,through which one would expect some water permeability. Phloretin also inhibited water transport by ApUT (data not shown), suggesting that both urea and water permeate through the same channel. The ApUT-mediated efflux of urea increased with increasing urea concentration. At higher urea concentrations, the efflux rate reached saturation and showed typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics. We measured a half-activation constant K1/2 of ~110 mM, which is in the range of K1/2 values reported for UT-B (K1/2= 396 mM 32 and 218 mM 36). For UT-A and Yut, however, a saturable urea flux was not observed, even at urea concentrations as high as 1 M 6; 14; 33. A K1/2 could therefore not be determined for UT-A. This discrepancy between members of the UT family may be related to the systems used to measure the urea efflux rates. UT-B kinetics were measured in erythrocytes, whereas UT-A-mediated efflux was measured in frog oocytes. Since we used purified protein reconstituted into liposomes to characterize urea transport by ApUT, our measurements should not be affected by other membrane proteins present in membranes purified from erythrocytes or in Xenopus oocytes. In summary, our results show that ApUT from A. pleuropneumoniae is a dimer in detergent solution and in the membrane and that it forms a urea specific channel with some permeability for water. The urea flux can be saturated, is inhibited by phloretin, and is independent of pH. Our projection map of ApUT provides the first structural information on UTs. A high-resolution structure will be required, however, to fully understand the mechanism of UT-mediated urea transport. Material and Methods Cloning and cell culture The gene encoding the urea transporter was amplified by PCR using genomic DNA from A. pleuropneunomiae (ATCC, catalog no. 27088D) as a template. The gene was cloned into the pET-15b plasmid (Novagen) with a 6xHis-tag fused to the N terminus. The recombinant plasmid was sequenced, and the inserted gene was found to be identical to the published sequence 31. ApUT was expressed in E. coli strain C-43. 12 l of 2x YT medium were inoculated at 37°C with an overnight culture, followed by induction with 0.5 mM isopropyl-ß,D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at an OD600 of 0.8. Cells were grown at 25°C and harvested 2-3 h after induction. Protein purification Cells were resuspended in homogenization buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl and 1 mM PMSF) and broken by one passage through a microfluidizer operated at 1.5 kbar. Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 6,500g for 15 min at 4°C, and the membrane fraction was collected by centrifugation at 150,000g for 90 min at 4°C. Membranes were resuspended in homogenization buffer and stored at −80°C until further use. Membranes were solubilized in buffer A (1% (w/v) dodecyl-ß,D-maltoside (DDM) (Anatrace) in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl). After stirring for 1 h at 4 C, the solution was clarified by centrifugation at 150,000g for 25 min at 4°C and incubated with Ni2+-NTA resin (Qiagen) (1 ml per 100 mg of membranes) for 1 h at 4°C. The resin was poured into a column and washed with 10 column volumes of buffer B (0.1% DDM in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 500 mM NaCl, 30 mM imidazole). The protein was eluted in buffer C (0.05% DDM in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 300 mM imidazole). Peak fractions were combined and further purified by size-exclusion chromatography using a Superose-12 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with buffer C. Typically, up to 0.7 mg of pure ApUT could be purified from one liter of E. coli cell culture. Cross-linking and blue-native gel electrophoresis Prior to cross-linking experiments, the protein was dialyzed against 0.05% DDM in 25 mM NaPi (pH 7.4), 300 mM NaCl. Glutardialdehyde was added to final concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 10 mM. After a 30-min incubation at room temperature, the reactions were quenched by addition of 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). The cross-linked samples were analyzed on a Coomassie-stained polyacrylamide-SDS gel. For blue native gel electrophoresis 37 linear 4-16% Bis-Tris NativePAGE gels (Invitrogen) were used. Protein samples were supplemented with a 10-fold concentrated loading dye (5% Coomassie Brilliant Blue, 100 mM Bis-Tris (pH 7.0), 500 mM 6-amino-n-caproic acid). Two-dimensional (2D) crystallization Purified ApUT was diluted to 1 mg/ml with 0.05% DDM in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl. 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (POPC), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC), and E. coli polar lipids (all from Avanti) were each dissolved at 10 mg/ml in 1.5%–5% (w/v) decyl-ß,D-maltoside (DM) and mixed with protein at lipid-to-protein ratios of 0.1 – 1.5 (w/w). After an overnight incubation on ice, the mixtures were dialyzed at 30°C against 50 mM MES (pH 6), 200 mM NaCl, 3 mM NaN3 for 7 days with buffer exchanges every other day. Electron microscopy and image processing 2D crystals were negatively stained with uranyl formate as described 38. Electron micrographs were recorded with an FEI Tecnai T12 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV. Images were taken on imaging plates at a magnification of 67,000x and a defocus of −1.5 μm using low-dose conditions. Imaging plates were read out with a DITABIS micron imaging plate scanner using a step size of 15 μm, a gain setting of 20,000, and a laser power setting of 30%. 2 × 2 pixels were averaged, yielding a pixel size of 4.5 Å on the specimen level. Selected images were processed using the program 2dx 39, which is based on the MRC image processing programs 40. Reconstitution of purified ApUT into liposomes Liposomes were prepared as described previously 19. 50 mg of E. coli polar lipids (Avanti) were resuspended in 1 ml of dialysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.9% (w/v) NaCl). A 20-ml aliquot of purified protein solution (1.4 mg/ml) was mixed with 112 ml of liposomes (50 mg/ml) at a lipid-to-protein ratio of 200 (w/w), 10 ml of 20% (w/v) sodium cholate and 17 ml of 5 M NaCl, in a final volume of 205 ml. The mixture was incubated on ice for 10 minutes, followed by a passage through a 1-ml Sephadex G-50 (fine) column equilibrated with dialysis buffer. Solute and water permeability measurements Liposomes were incubated overnight in dialysis buffer containing 15 mM 5,6-carboxyfluoresceine (CF). External CF was removed by passing the liposomes through a PD-10 desalting sephadex column (GE). Osmotic water permeability (Pf) was measured at 25°C as described earlier 41; 42; 43. Briefly, liposomes were abruptly exposed to a doubling of external osmolarity in a stopped-flow fluorometer (SF.17 MV, Applied Photophysics, Leatherhead, United Kingdom), which has a measurement dead time of less than 2 ms. The rate of water efflux from the liposomes was measured as a decrease of CF fluorescence due to self-quenching of the fluorophore. Data from 8-10 measurements were averaged and fit to a single exponential curve. A family of single exponential curves was generated by simulation of the water permeability equation, in which only the Pf value was varied using the MathCad software (MathSoft Inc., Cambridge, MA) as described earlier 44. The permeability for urea and urea analogs was measured by pre-equilibrating the vesicles at a solute concentration of 300 mM in buffer (650 mosmol/kg) for 30 min and then rapidly diluting the vesicle suspension two-fold in the stopped-flow device to create an isoosmotic solute gradient 45. An appropriate amount of NaCl was added to maintain the isoosmotic conditions upon dilution. Vesicle shrinkage due to solute efflux was measured by recording CF quenching over time. Since CF is sensitive to pH, for measurements of pH dependence of solute efflux, light scattering at 600 nm was used to measure vesicle shrinkage. Osmolalities of all solutions were confirmed and, if necessary, adjusted by measuring freezing point depression on a Precision Instruments Osmette A osmometer. Vesicle sizes were determined by using quasi-elastic light scattering with a DynaPro particle sizer. Permeability coefficients were calculated using the Mathcad software as described earlier 45; 46. Urea transport inhibitor studies were performed by incubating the vesicles for 30 min in buffer containing 2 mM phloretin. Kinetic studies of ApUT were performed by incubating the proteoliposomes in urea solutions ranging in concentration from 25 mM to 500 mM. The urea flux per average vesicle was calculated based on Eq. (1):
where Jurea is the rate of uptake in mol/s, SA is the surface area of a vesicle in cm2, and [urea] is the urea concentration in mol/cm3. Purea was determined experimentally. The surface area of a single average vesicle was determined from the diameter measured by quasi-elastic light scattering as described above. Acknowledgments This work was supported by NIH grant RO1 GM082927 (to T.W.) and DK43955 (to M.L.Z. and J.C.M). The molecular EM facility at Harvard Medical School was established with a generous donation from the Giovanni Armenise Harvard Center for Structural Biology and is maintained with funds from NIH Grant PO1 GM62580 (to Stephen C. Harrison). T.W. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. S.R. was a fellow of the German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina (BMBF-LPD 9901/8-163). Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References 1. Mills J, Wyborn NR, Greenwood JA, Williams SG, Jones CW. An outer-membrane porin inducible by short-chain amides and urea in the methylotrophic bacterium Methylophilus methylotrophus. Microbiology. 1997;143(Pt 7):2373–9. [PubMed] 2. ElBerry HM, Majumdar ML, Cunningham TS, Sumrada RA, Cooper TG. Regulation of the urea active transporter gene (DUR3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:4688–98. [PubMed] 3. MacAulay N, Gether U, Klaeke DA, Zeuthen T. Passive water and urea permeability of a human Na(+)-glutamate cotransporter expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol. 2002;542:817–28. [PubMed] 4. Valladares A, Montesinos ML, Herrero A, Flores E. An ABC-type, high-affinity urea permease identified in cyanobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:703–15. [PubMed] 5. Weeks DL, Eskandari S, Scott DR, Sachs G. A H+-gated urea channel: the link between Helicobacter pylori urease and gastric colonization. Science. 2000;287:482–5. [PubMed] 6. You G, Smith CP, Kanai Y, Lee WS, Stelzner M, Hediger MA. Cloning and characterization of the vasopressin-regulated urea transporter. Nature. 1993;365:844–7. [PubMed] 7. Borgnia M, Nielsen S, Engel A, Agre P. Cellular and molecular biology of the aquaporin water channels. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:425–58. [PubMed] 8. Rojek A, Praetorius J, Frokiaer J, Nielsen S, Fenton RA. A current view of the mammalian aquaglyceroporins. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008;70:301–27. [PubMed] 9. Saier MH., Jr A functional-phylogenetic classification system for transmembrane solute transporters. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:354–411. [PubMed] 10. Athmann C, Zeng N, Kang T, Marcus EA, Scott DR, Rektorschek M, Buhmann A, Melchers K, Sachs G. Local pH elevation mediated by the intrabacterial urease of Helicobacter pylori cocultured with gastric cells. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:339–47. [PubMed] 11. Smith CP, Fenton RA. Genomic organization of the mammalian SLC14a2 urea transporter genes. J Membr Biol. 2006;212:109–17. [PubMed] 12. Dobson JG, Jr, Shea LG, Fenton RA. Adenosine A2A and beta-adrenergic calcium transient and contractile responses in rat ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295:H2364–72. [PubMed] 13. Minocha R, Studley K, Saier MH., Jr The urea transporter (UT) family: bioinformatic analyses leading to structural, functional, and evolutionary predictions. Receptors Channels. 2003;9:345–52. [PubMed] 14. Sebbane F, Bury-Mone S, Cailliau K, Browaeys-Poly E, De Reuse H, Simonet M. The Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Yut protein, a new type of urea transporter homologous to eukaryotic channels and functionally interchangeable in vitro with the Helicobacter pylori UreI protein. Mol Microbiol. 2002;45:1165–74. [PubMed] 15. Heuberger EH, Veenhoff LM, Duurkens RH, Friesen RH, Poolman B. Oligomeric state of membrane transport proteins analyzed with blue native electrophoresis and analytical ultracentrifugation. J Mol Biol. 2002;317:591–600. [PubMed] 16. Valpuesta JM, Carrascosa JL, Henderson R. Analysis of electron microscope images and electron diffraction patterns of thin crystals of phi 29 connectors in ice. J Mol Biol. 1994;240:281–7. [PubMed] 17. Zeidel ML, Ambudkar SV, Smith BL, Agre P. Reconstitution of functional water channels in liposomes containing purified red cell CHIP28 protein. Biochemistry. 1992;31:7436–40. [PubMed] 18. Raunser S, Appel M, Ganea C, Geldmacher-Kaufer U, Fendler K, Kühlbrandt W. Structure and Function of Prokaryotic Glutamate Transporters from Escherichia coli and Pyrococcus horikoshii. Biochemistry. 2006;45:12769–12805. 19. Raunser S, Haase W, Bostina M, Parcej DN, Kuhlbrandt W. High-yield expression, reconstitution and structure of the recombinant, fully functional glutamate transporter GLT-1 from Rattus norvegicus. J Mol Biol. 2005;351:598–613. [PubMed] 20. Vinothkumar KR, Raunser S, Jung H, Kuhlbrandt W. Oligomeric structure of the carnitine transporter CaiT from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:4795–801. [PubMed] 21. Bessonneau P, Besson V, Collinson I, Duong F. The SecYEG preprotein translocation channel is a conformationally dynamic and dimeric structure. Embo J. 2002;21:995–1003. [PubMed] 22. Williams KA, Geldmacher-Kaufer U, Padan E, Schuldiner S, Kühlbrandt W. Projection structure of NhaA, a secondary transporter from Escherichia coli, at 4.0 A resolution. EMBO Journal. 1999;18:3558–63. [PubMed] 23. Dutzler R, Campbell EB, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. X-ray structure of a ClC chloride channel at 3.0 A reveals the molecular basis of anion selectivity. Nature. 2002;415:287–94. [PubMed] 24. Breyton C, Haase W, Rapoport TA, Kuhlbrandt W, Collinson I. Three-dimensional structure of the bacterial protein-translocation complex SecYEG. Nature. 2002;418:662–5. [PubMed] 25. Gonen T, Walz T. The structure of aquaporins. Q Rev Biophys. 2006;39:361–96. [PubMed] 26. MacKinnon R. Potassium channels. FEBS Lett. 2003;555:62–5. [PubMed] 27. Shayakul C, Hediger MA. The SLC14 gene family of urea transporters. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:603–9. [PubMed] 28. Fenton RA, Stewart GS, Carpenter B, Howorth A, Potter EA, Cooper GJ, Smith CP. Characterization of mouse urea transporters UT-A1 and UT-A2. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;283:F817–25. [PubMed] 29. Miller C. An overview of the potassium channel family. Genome Biol. 2000;1:REVIEWS0004. [PubMed] 30. Bosse JT, MacInnes JI. Urease activity may contribute to the ability of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae to establish infection. Can J Vet Res. 2000;64:145–50. [PubMed] 31. Bosse JT, Gilmour HD, MacInnes JI. Novel genes affecting urease acivity in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:1242–7. [PubMed] 32. Brahm J. Urea permeability of human red cells. J Gen Physiol. 1983;82:1–23. [PubMed] 33. Maciver B, Smith CP, Hill WG, Zeidel ML. Functional characterization of mouse urea transporters UT-A2 and UT-A3 expressed in purified Xenopus laevis oocyte plasma membranes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294:F956–64. [PubMed] 34. Zhao D, Sonawane ND, Levin MH, Yang B. Comparative transport efficiencies of urea analogues through urea transporter UT-B. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:1815–21. [PubMed] 35. Yang B, Verkman AS. Analysis of double knockout mice lacking aquaporin-1 and urea transporter UT-B. Evidence for UT-B-facilitated water transport in erythrocytes. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:36782–6. [PubMed] 36. Mayrand RR, Levitt DG. Urea and ethylene glycol-facilitated transport systems in the human red cell membrane. Saturation, competition, and asymmetry. J Gen Physiol. 1983;81:221–37. [PubMed] 37. Schagger H, von Jagow G. Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal Biochem. 1991;199:223–31. [PubMed] 38. Ohi M, Li Y, Cheng Y, Walz T. Negative Staining and Image Classification - Powerful Tools in Modern Electron Microscopy. Biol Proced Online. 2004;6:23–34. [PubMed] 39. Gipson B, Zeng X, Zhang ZY, Stahlberg H. 2dx--user-friendly image processing for 2D crystals. J Struct Biol. 2007;157:64–72. [PubMed] 40. Crowther RA, Henderson R, Smith JM. MRC image processing programs. J Struct Biol. 1996;116:9–16. [PubMed] 41. Lande MB, Donovan JM, Zeidel ML. The relationship between membrane fluidity and permeabilities to water, solutes, ammonia, and protons. J Gen Physiol. 1995;106:67–84. [PubMed] 42. Negrete HO, Rivers RL, Goughs AH, Colombini M, Zeidel ML. Individual leaflets of a membrane bilayer can independently regulate permeability. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:11627–30. [PubMed] 43. Rivers RL, Dean RM, Chandy G, Hall JE, Roberts DM, Zeidel ML. Functional analysis of nodulin 26, an aquaporin in soybean root nodule symbiosomes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:16256–61. [PubMed] 44. Grossman EB, Harris HW, Jr, Star RA, Zeidel ML. Water and nonelectrolyte permeabilities of apical membranes of toad urinary bladder granular cells. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:C1109–18. [PubMed] 45. Mathai JC, Sprott GD, Zeidel ML. Molecular mechanisms of water and solute transport across archaebacterial lipid membranes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:27266–71. [PubMed] 46. Mathai JC, Mori S, Smith BL, Preston GM, Mohandas N, Collins M, van Zijl PC, Zeidel ML, Agre P. Functional analysis of aquaporin-1 deficient red cells. The Colton-null phenotype. In J Biol Chem. 1996;271:1309–13. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Microbiology. 1997 Jul; 143 ( Pt 7)():2373-9.
[Microbiology. 1997]J Bacteriol. 1993 Aug; 175(15):4688-98.
[J Bacteriol. 1993]J Physiol. 2002 Aug 1; 542(Pt 3):817-28.
[J Physiol. 2002]Mol Microbiol. 2002 Feb; 43(3):703-15.
[Mol Microbiol. 2002]Science. 2000 Jan 21; 287(5452):482-5.
[Science. 2000]Annu Rev Physiol. 2008; 70():301-27.
[Annu Rev Physiol. 2008]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Jun; 64(2):354-411.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000]J Clin Invest. 2000 Aug; 106(3):339-47.
[J Clin Invest. 2000]J Membr Biol. 2006; 212(2):109-17.
[J Membr Biol. 2006]Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Dec; 295(6):H2364-72.
[Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008]Receptors Channels. 2003; 9(6):345-52.
[Receptors Channels. 2003]Mol Microbiol. 2002 Aug; 45(4):1165-74.
[Mol Microbiol. 2002]J Mol Biol. 2002 Apr 5; 317(4):591-600.
[J Mol Biol. 2002]J Mol Biol. 1994 Jul 22; 240(4):281-7.
[J Mol Biol. 1994]Biochemistry. 1992 Aug 25; 31(33):7436-40.
[Biochemistry. 1992]J Mol Biol. 2002 Apr 5; 317(4):591-600.
[J Mol Biol. 2002]J Mol Biol. 2005 Aug 19; 351(3):598-613.
[J Mol Biol. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2006 Feb 24; 281(8):4795-801.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]EMBO J. 2002 Mar 1; 21(5):995-1003.
[EMBO J. 2002]EMBO J. 1999 Jul 1; 18(13):3558-63.
[EMBO J. 1999]Nature. 2002 Jan 17; 415(6869):287-94.
[Nature. 2002]Nature. 2002 Aug 8; 418(6898):662-5.
[Nature. 2002]Q Rev Biophys. 2006 Nov; 39(4):361-96.
[Q Rev Biophys. 2006]FEBS Lett. 2003 Nov 27; 555(1):62-5.
[FEBS Lett. 2003]Pflugers Arch. 2004 Feb; 447(5):603-9.
[Pflugers Arch. 2004]Can J Vet Res. 2000 Jul; 64(3):145-50.
[Can J Vet Res. 2000]J Bacteriol. 2001 Feb; 183(4):1242-7.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]J Gen Physiol. 1983 Jul; 82(1):1-23.
[J Gen Physiol. 1983]Mol Microbiol. 2002 Aug; 45(4):1165-74.
[Mol Microbiol. 2002]Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008 Apr; 294(4):F956-64.
[Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Jul; 1768(7):1815-21.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 27; 277(39):36782-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]J Gen Physiol. 1983 Jul; 82(1):1-23.
[J Gen Physiol. 1983]J Gen Physiol. 1983 Feb; 81(2):221-37.
[J Gen Physiol. 1983]Nature. 1993 Oct 28; 365(6449):844-7.
[Nature. 1993]Mol Microbiol. 2002 Aug; 45(4):1165-74.
[Mol Microbiol. 2002]Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008 Apr; 294(4):F956-64.
[Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008]J Bacteriol. 2001 Feb; 183(4):1242-7.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]Anal Biochem. 1991 Dec; 199(2):223-31.
[Anal Biochem. 1991]Biol Proced Online. 2004; 6():23-34.
[Biol Proced Online. 2004]J Struct Biol. 2007 Jan; 157(1):64-72.
[J Struct Biol. 2007]J Struct Biol. 1996 Jan-Feb; 116(1):9-16.
[J Struct Biol. 1996]J Mol Biol. 2005 Aug 19; 351(3):598-613.
[J Mol Biol. 2005]J Gen Physiol. 1995 Jul; 106(1):67-84.
[J Gen Physiol. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1996 May 17; 271(20):11627-30.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1997 Jun 27; 272(26):16256-61.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Am J Physiol. 1992 May; 262(5 Pt 1):C1109-18.
[Am J Physiol. 1992]J Biol Chem. 2001 Jul 20; 276(29):27266-71.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2001 Jul 20; 276(29):27266-71.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]