• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. May 2009; 5(5): e1000497.
Published online May 29, 2009. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1000497
PMCID: PMC2682760

Iron-Sulfur (Fe/S) Protein Biogenesis: Phylogenomic and Genetic Studies of A-Type Carriers

William F. Burkholder, Editor

Abstract

Iron sulfur (Fe/S) proteins are ubiquitous and participate in multiple biological processes, from photosynthesis to DNA repair. Iron and sulfur are highly reactive chemical species, and the mechanisms allowing the multiprotein systems ISC and SUF to assist Fe/S cluster formation in vivo have attracted considerable attention. Here, A-Type components of these systems (ATCs for A-Type Carriers) are studied by phylogenomic and genetic analyses. ATCs that have emerged in the last common ancestor of bacteria were conserved in most bacteria and were acquired by eukaryotes and few archaea via horizontal gene transfers. Many bacteria contain multiple ATCs, as a result of gene duplication and/or horizontal gene transfer events. Based on evolutionary considerations, we could define three subfamilies: ATC-I, -II and -III. Escherichia coli, which has one ATC-I (ErpA) and two ATC-IIs (IscA and SufA), was used as a model to investigate functional redundancy between ATCs in vivo. Genetic analyses revealed that, under aerobiosis, E. coli IscA and SufA are functionally redundant carriers, as both are potentially able to receive an Fe/S cluster from IscU or the SufBCD complex and transfer it to ErpA. In contrast, under anaerobiosis, redundancy occurs between ErpA and IscA, which are both potentially able to receive Fe/S clusters from IscU and transfer them to an apotarget. Our combined phylogenomic and genetic study indicates that ATCs play a crucial role in conveying ready-made Fe/S clusters from components of the biogenesis systems to apotargets. We propose a model wherein the conserved biochemical function of ATCs provides multiple paths for supplying Fe/S clusters to apotargets. This model predicts the occurrence of a dynamic network, the structure and composition of which vary with the growth conditions. As an illustration, we depict three ways for a given protein to be matured, which appears to be dependent on the demand for Fe/S biogenesis.

Author Summary

Iron sulfur (Fe/S) proteins are found in all living organisms where they participate in a wide array of biological processes. Accordingly, genetic defects in Fe/S biogenesis yield pleiotropic phenotypes in bacteria and several syndromes in humans. Multiprotein systems that assist Fe/S cluster formation and insertion into apoproteins have been identified. Most systems include so-called A-type proteins (which we refer to as ATC proteins hereafter), which have an undefined role in Fe/S biogenesis. Phylogenomic analyses presented, here, reveal that the ATC gene is ancient, that it was already present in the last common ancestor of bacteria, and that it subsequently spread to eukaryotes via mitochondria or chloroplastic endosymbioses and to a few archaea via horizontal gene transfers. Proteobacteria are unusual in having multiple ATCs. We show by a genetic approach that the three ATC proteins of E. coli are potentially interchangeable, but that redundancy is limited in vivo, either because of gene expression control or because of inefficient Fe/S transfers between ATCs and other components within the Fe/S biogenesis pathway. The combined phylogenomic and genetic approaches allow us to propose that multiple ATCs enable E. coli to diversify the ways for conveying ready-made Fe/S clusters from components of the biogenesis systems to apotargets, and that environmental conditions influence which pathway is used.

Introduction

Fe/S proteins are present in all living cells, where they participate in a wide range of physiological processes including respiration, photosynthesis, DNA repair, metabolism and regulation of gene expression [1],[2]. Since the discovery of a dedicated system for the maturation of nitrogenase in Azotobacter vinelandii [3],[4], the in vivo mechanism of Fe/S cluster formation and insertion into proteins has received increasing attention. A main conclusion is that this process involves several protein factors that are conserved throughout eukaryotes and prokaryotes [5][11].

Besides the NIF system dedicated to nitrogenase maturation, general systems involved in Fe/S cluster formation, called ISC and SUF, have been described. Sulfur is provided to these systems by cysteine desulfurases, referred to as NifS, IscS, and SufS [3], [12][16]. The role of CsdA, another E. coli cysteine desulfurase, remains to be assessed [17],[18]. In eukaryotes, iron is provided by frataxin [19], and its alteration causes pathological disorders, e.g. Friedreich ataxia in humans [20],[21]. In prokaryotes, frataxin-like, ferritin-like proteins and siderophores were proposed to provide iron for Fe/S biogenesis [22][25]. Scaffold proteins bind iron and sulfur and form Fe/S clusters that are eventually transferred to apotargets. Scaffold proteins were first described in the nitrogen fixing bacterium A. vinelandii [26], and subsequently in other bacteria, yeast, plants and humans, where they are referred to as IscU, Isu, NifU or Nfu [5][8], [27][29]. The SUF and ISC systems also include ATP-hydrolyzing proteins such as SufBCD, a pseudo ABC ATPase complex [24],[30], or HscBA, a DnaJK-like co/chaperone system [31],[32]. Recent results from the Fontecave lab showed that SufB contains an Fe/S cluster and forms a complex with SufC and SufD that can transfer this Fe/S cluster to apotargets ([30], M. Fontecave et al., personal communication). These observations lead to the hypothesis that the SufBCD complex could fulfill the scaffold function within the SUF system. Last, there are the A-type proteins, e.g. IscA, SufA, IscANif, ErpA, ISA1 and ISA2, whose biochemical functions and cellular roles remain unclear despite their presence in most studied systems. They are the objects of the present study, where they will be referred to as A-Type Carrier (ATC).

An important issue regarding the role of ATCs pertains to their specificity in vivo. Indeed, genomes of model organisms, such as E. coli or S. cerevisiae, encode several ATC homologs, raising the question of whether they are functionally redundant. For instance, E. coli synthesizes three ATCs, IscA, SufA and ErpA, sharing 30% sequence identity [33]. Whereas the inactivation of iscA or sufA was almost neutral, an erpA mutation was found to be lethal under respiratory growth conditions [33]. Also, work on A. vinelandii revealed that an iscA mutation was lethal at high oxygen concentration [34]. Hence, these studies supported the notion that there are functional differences between the ATCs in vivo. On the other hand, functional redundancy between ATCs was indicated by other experiments: (i) in E. coli, an iscA sufA double mutant was found to exhibit a strongly decreased growth rate whereas single mutants grew almost like a wild type strain [35],[36, see Discussion], (ii) in S. cerevisiae, a double ISA1 ISA2 knockout exhibited a series of mitochondrial phenotypes not shown by single mutants [37][39]. Importantly, the perception that ATCs are functionally redundant is consistent with in vitro studies where either of the ATCs tested was found to transfer Fe/S to apotargets with similar efficiency [7],[29].

In this work, we combined phylogenomic and genetic approaches to answer several of the questions raised by the presence of an ATC in each Fe/S biogenesis system studied so far. Phylogenomic studies allowed us to trace the emergence of ATCs in bacteria and to follow their evolution throughout living organisms. This analysis gave insight on the question of when and where genetic redundancy arose and allowed the identification of three subfamilies (-I, -II and -III) of ATC. In this regard, Gamma-Proteobacteria, including E. coli, stood out as being exceptional in containing three ATCs belonging to ATC-I and ATC-II subfamilies. The genetic study showed that these ATCs are potentially interchangeable but that this bacterium has evolved to prevent full redundancy by controlling the synthesis of each ATC and the efficiency of its partnership with other components of the Fe/S biogenesis line. Phylogenomic and genetic data indicate that the evolution of ATC-II members was constrained by their partnership with scaffolds from which they receive Fe/S clusters, whereas the evolution of ATC-I members was mainly driven by their partnership with the apotargets to which they transfer Fe/S clusters. The net result is that the cell exploits the multiple ATCs homologs by positioning them between the cysteine desulfurase/scaffold duo and the apotargets, where they act as connectors between different routes for conveying Fe/S clusters from the scaffold to apotargets.

Results

Distribution of the ATC Proteins

Experimentally characterized ATCs (e.g. ErpA, SufA, IscA, IscANif, ISA1 and ISA2) contain a single domain of ~100 residues referred to as PF01521 in the Pfam database. By using this domain as a query, we detected 991 proteins within 622 complete prokaryotic genomes. Among these proteins, 192 contained a truncated PF01521 C-terminal domain, e.g. in Firmicutes, or additional domains, e.g. NfuA proteins found in Gamma-Proteobacteria that contained an Nfu domain fused to PF01521 (see “other” category in Table S1). Similar to the well-characterized ATCs, 799 proteins harbored a single complete PF01521 domain, and were thus considered ATC proteins sensu stricto. These 799 ATC proteins were present in a majority of prokaryotes (436 of 622, ~70%, Table S1 and Figure 1). In contrast, ATC proteins are absent in all Epsilon-Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Fusobacteria, Thermotogae and nearly all Archaea and PVC (Planctomycetales-Verrucomicrobia-Chlamydiae) as well as in many Firmicutes, Delta-Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi (Table S1 and Figure 1). Except in the amitochondria Entamoeba and the highly divergent amitochondriate Microsporidia, ATC encoding genes have been detected in all eukaryotic genomes. More precisely, amitochondriate anaerobic eukaryotes such as Giardia lamblia or Trichomonas vaginalis were found to possess only one ATC encoding gene whereas all other eukaryotes encoded at least two ATCs. A third copy is present in the genome of photosynthetic eukaryotes (e.g. Viridiplantae, Rhodophyta and Stramenopiles, see Table S1). The high conservation of ATC highlights the functional importance of these proteins in eukaryotes and bacteria.

Figure 1
Model for ATC protein evolution.

Phylogenomic Analysis of the ATC Proteins

In order to study the origin and the evolution of the ATC genes, we performed a phylogenomic analysis of the ATC proteins. We inferred the presence of an ATC in the ancestor of a phylum if, in the ATC phylogeny, we found a monophyletic group of ATC that corresponded to the phylum and if the corresponding genes were well distributed within that phylum. The exhaustive phylogenomic analysis of the 911 ATCs from complete prokaryotic genomes showed that the bacterial and the few archaeal sequences did not form two distinct clusters (Figure S1). In fact, archaeal homologs emerged from within different bacterial subgroups. For instance, sequences from Methanosarcina are close to Firmicutes whereas those from Halobacteriales and Delta-Proteobacteria group together (Figure S1). This result, combined with the scarcity of ATC sequences in archaea strongly suggested that the Last Archaeal Common Ancestor (LACA) had no ATC and that a few archaea independently acquired their ATC through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from bacteria (Figure 1, black circle number 3).

Next, in order to pinpoint the origin of bacterial and eukaryotic ATCs, we selected a subset of sequences representative of their diversity to perform a more in-depth phylogenomic analysis. The overall topology of the resulting Bayesian tree was in agreement with the exhaustive phylogeny of the ATC family (Figures 2 and S1). This tree showed a number of monophyletic groups, most of them well supported, which corresponded to major bacterial phyla (Figure 2), i.e. Actinobacteria (Posterior Probability = 1.0), Acidobacteria (PP = 1.00), Chloroflexi (PP = 0.91), Cyanobacteria (PP = 0.75), Deinococcus/Thermus (PP = 1.0), and two clusters of Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-Proteobacteria (PP = 1.0 and PP = 0.51). The wide distribution of the ATC encoding genes in these phyla suggested the presence of such a gene in their ancestors (Figure 1, pink filled-in diamonds and Figure S1). In contrast, ATC proteins were probably absent in the ancestors of the PVC, Spirochaetes, Thermotogae and Epsilon-Proteobacteria (Figure 1, pink empty diamonds). The situation was less clear for the remaining bacterial groups (Figure 1, diamonds with “?” inside), in which ATCs did not form monophyletic groups (e.g. Delta-Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi, Figure S1) or are too scarce, (e.g. Firmicutes, Table S1) or because too few representatives of the phylum were available (i.e. only one representative for Aquificae and for Fusobacteria, Figure 1). The presence of an ATC-encoding gene in the ancestors of a number of bacterial phyla indicated that the corresponding protein is ancient in Bacteria and may already have been present in the last ancestor of this domain (Last Bacterial Common Ancestor, Figure 1, black circle number 0). Consequently, the absence of any ATC-encoding gene in some bacterial lineages likely reflects secondary losses (empty pink diamonds in Figure 1). Caution should be taken to not extrapolate these observations to other components of the SUF and ISC systems as their own history will require a thorough phylogenomic analysis.

Figure 2
Phylogeny of the ATC proteins.

Eukaryotic ATC sequences form three distinct groups in the phylogeny. Two of these emerged within each of the two Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-Proteobacteria groups (PP = 1.0 and PP = 0.99), close to Alpha-Proteobacterial sequences (Figure 2). This did not support the hypothesis that genome duplication was responsible for the appearance of the two eucaryotic ATC copies but rather indicated that the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA) acquired two ATC from these Proteobacteria, likely through endosymbiosis (Figure 1, black circle number 4). The third group of eukaryotic sequences corresponded to the additional copy that is present only in photosynthetic eukaryotes and groups with cyanobacterial sequences (PP = 0.96), confirming its acquisition through the primary chloroplastic endosymbiosis in the ancestor of Plantae (Figure 1, black circle number 5). The presence of this gene in photosynthetic protists such as Stramenopiles indicated that it has been conserved through secondary chloroplastic endosymbioses (Figure 1, black circle number 6).

Defining Three Classes of ATC Proteins

Our phylogenomic analysis showed that ATC likely originated in the Last Bacterial Common Ancestor and were conserved in most bacterial lineages (Figure 1). Surprisingly, the genomes of nearly all Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-Proteobacteria were found to code for at least two ATCs sensu stricto (Table S1). The phylogenomic analysis of ATCs showed that these sequences formed two distinct monophyletic clusters (PP = 1.0 and PP = 0.51, Figure 2). In agreement with the phylogeny of proteobacteria within each cluster, Alpha-, Beta- plus Gamma-Proteobacteria each formed a monophyletic group. These observations indicated that the common ancestor of these Proteobacteria already contained two distinct ATCs that we propose to call ATC-I and ATC-II (Figure 1, blue and yellow filled-in diamonds). ATC-I includes ErpA from E. coli as well as yeast ISA2 whereas ATC-II includes both the SufA and IscA proteins from E. coli and yeast ISA1. ATC-I and ATC-II were conserved during the evolution of these Proteobacteria and in nearly all eukaryotes after their acquisition through the mitochondrial endosymbiosis. The poor resolution of the ATC phylogeny, in particular for the most basal nodes due to the small size of the set of sequences, did not allow us to identify the evolutionary event at the origin of ATC-I and ATC-II in Proteobacteria (Figure 1, black circle number 1). Two hypotheses can be proposed: (i) one of these two ATCs was acquired by the ancestor of Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-Proteobacteria via a HGT of an ATC gene from a non-proteobacterial donor, or (ii) these two ATCs arose from duplication of the native proteobacterial ATC gene. Few Gamma-Proteobacteria, mainly Enterobacteriales, harbor two ATC-II homologs, suggesting that these two copies emerged recently in this group, possibly through the duplication of an ancestral ATC-II copy (Figure 1, black circle number 2). This led us to divide the Gamma-proteobacterial ATC-II in two groups: ATC-IIa that includes E. coli IscA and ATC-IIb that contains E. coli SufA. Interestingly, the comparison of evolutionary distances within the ATC-I, IIa and IIb subfamilies reveals that the corresponding ATC sequences did not evolve at the same rate. This is highlighted by the fact that the lengths of the branches separating ATC sequences from two organisms are different according to the considered family. For example, the evolutionary distances deduced from the tree of Figure 2 between ATC sequences from E. coli K12 and its close relative Yersinia enterolitica 8081 are 0.32 substitutions per site for ATC-IIb, 0.163 for ATC-IIa and 0.068 for ATC-I. This clearly indicated that ATC-IIb sequences are the fastest evolving sequences whereas ATC-I sequences are the slowest.

Finally, the ATC phylogeny showed another well supported subfamily of ATCs that includes sequences annotated as IscANif involved in nitrogenase maturation. We propose classifying them as a third ATC subfamily (ATC-III, PP = 1.0, Figure 2). These sequences are present in organisms from various bacterial phyla (Supplementary Table S1), suggesting that they spread to various bacteria via HGT. Based on our data, it is not possible to determine in which bacterial phylum this third ATC family originated.

Relationships between ATC Encoding Genes and Their Genetic Contexts

The analysis of the genomic context of ATC genes led us to several new considerations. We first observed that the genetic context of non-proteobacterial ATC and proteobacterial ATC-I encoding genes was not conserved and very rarely contained genes encoding ISC or SUF components (Figure 2). In contrast, most of the ATC-II encoding genes were surrounded by genes encoding ISC or SUF components (Figure 2). More precisely, in Beta- and Gamma-Proteobacteria, most ATC-II encoding genes, including E. coli ATC-IIa member iscA, lie close to genes coding for the ISC system. In contrast, ATC-IIb genes are associated with genes coding for components of the SUF system as it is the case for E. coli sufA. This indicated that the association of ATC-II with genes encoding components of the ISC system is likely ancestral in these two proteobacterial subdivisions. Our phylogenomic analysis of the ATCs suggested that the two ATC-II copies observed in some Gamma-Proteobacteria resulted from a recent evolutionary event. It is possible that one of the two resulting copies (i.e. ATC-IIb) was subsequently associated with the SUF system, whereas the other (i.e. ATC-IIa) remained associated with the ISC system. The situation is less clear for the single ATC-II from Alpha-Proteobacteria since the type of association seemed to have changed many times during the evolution of this subdivision. For example, ATC-II encoding genes from Rickettsiales (e.g. from Rickettsia or Wolbachia) are associated with genes from the ISC system, whereas their close relatives (e.g. from Rhizobium, Nitrobacter or Rhodospirilum) are in the neighborhood of the SUF system encoding genes (Figure 2).

The genes belonging to the ATC-III family are surrounded by genes annotated as nif (Figure 2). This strongly suggests that all these ATC-III encoding genes are indeed involved in nitrogenase maturation. Because we showed that ATC-III genes spread by HGT among bacteria from different phyla, this suggests that these HGTs may have involved the whole NIF gene cluster.

In vivo Redundancy versus Specificity: a Genetic Approach in E. coli

E. coli emerged from the phylogenomic approach as representative of the subset of bacteria that synthesize three ATCs: one type I, ErpA, and two type II, IscA and SufA. We next exploit the genetic amenability of this organism to investigate the redundancy versus specificity of the ATC proteins. Results are presented in the sections thereafter.

iscA and sufA Mutations Are Synthetically Lethal under Aerobic Conditions

To investigate a potential redundancy between iscA and sufA, we sought to construct a strain lacking both genes. For this purpose, the ΔiscA::cat mutation present in strain DV698 was transduced into strain DV701 (ΔsufA). The number of tranductants was surprisingly low, two orders of magnitude less, at best, than with the wild type MG1655 used as recipient (Table 1). Similarly, the ΔsufA::kan mutation could not be P1-transduced into the ΔiscA mutant strain DV699. These observations suggested that combining the iscA and sufA mutations in the same background was lethal.

Table 1
iscA and sufA mutations are synthetically lethal in the presence of oxygen.

To test the hypothesis that the iscA and sufA mutations were synthetically lethal, we used a co-transduction strategy, wherein the acquisition of the mutation to be tested is not used as a direct marker in the selection procedure. Hence, we used strain DV1239 (ΔiscA::cat zfh-208::Tn10) in which a Tn10 transposon (TetR) was inserted near the ΔiscA::cat (CamR) mutation. We selected TetR transductants and co-transduction of the ΔiscA::cat (CamR) was subsequently analyzed. The co-transduction frequency of the ΔiscA::cat mutation with zfh-208::Tn10 was about 75% in the wild type and <1% in the ΔsufA DV701 strain (Table 1). This result, in agreement with other data [36],[40], indicated that the presence of a ΔsufA mutation in the recipient strain counterselected the subsequent acquisition of the ΔiscA::cat mutation. The same conclusion could be drawn from the reciprocal experiment carried out using strain DV1230 (ΔsufA::kan zdi-925::Tn10) with a Tn10 located in the vicinity of the sufA gene as a P1 donor, and DV699 (ΔiscA) as recipient (Table 1). We verified that the incompatibility between the iscA and sufA mutations was not due to polar effects on downstream genes in the isc or suf operon (see Materials and Methods). Taken together, these experiments established that iscA and sufA null mutations are synthetically lethal under aerobic conditions, suggesting that the IscA and SufA proteins are redundant for some function(s) essential for cell survival.

An iscA sufA Double Mutant Is Defective for IPP Biosynthesis under Aerobiosis

IspG/H are essential Fe/S enzymes in E. coli because they participate to the isoprenoid (IPP) synthesis pathway. We therefore speculated that an iscA sufA mutant is not viable because IspG/H proteins are not matured. We demonstrated that this is actually the case by introducing eukaryotic genes that allow IPP synthesis from exogenously added mevalonate (hereafter referred to as the MVA pathway). The presence of this pathway allowed us to co-transduce the ΔiscA::cat mutation with the zfh-208::Tn10 locus into the ΔsufA MVA+ strain DV731 (Table 2). Moreover, none of the TetR CamR transductants selected was able to grow in the absence of mevalonate. These results indicate that the heterologous MVA pathway suppresses the defects of an iscA sufA mutant and, by inference that the synthetic lethality under aerobiosis of combining the iscA and sufA mutations comes from a lack of IPP. It is important to underscore that we checked that none of the mutants analyzed is altered in the expression of the ispG or ispH cognate structural genes (data not shown). Hence, we can safely conclude that the molecular bases of the defects exhibited by the iscA sufA mutant in aerobiosis are related to a lack of maturation of the 4Fe/4S-containing IspG and/or IspH proteins.

Table 2
iscA and sufA mutations are synthetically lethal under aerobiosis because of defective IPP biosynthesis.

An iscA sufA Double Mutant Is Viable under Anaerobic Conditions

The phenotype of an iscA sufA mutant, i.e. lethality under aerobiosis suppressible by the MVA pathway, is identical to that of an erpA mutant [33]. We therefore tested whether an iscA sufA mutant was viable under anaerobiosis, like an erpA mutant. In these conditions, we could co-transduce the ΔsufA::kan mutation with the zdi-925::Tn10 marker into either the wild type strain or the ΔiscA mutant (Table 3). Conversely, we could transduce the ΔiscA::cat mutation into the wild type or the ΔsufA DV701 strains (Table 3). Interestingly, the ΔsufA ΔiscA transductants selected under anaerobiosis were unable to form colonies when subsequently incubated aerobically (data not shown). Similarly, the iscA sufA MVA+ strains were able to grow in the absence of mevalonate only in anaerobiosis (Table 4). These results extended the similarity between the conditional phenotype of erpA and iscA sufA mutants.

Table 3
iscA and sufA mutations are not synthetically lethal in the absence of oxygen.
Table 4
Functional redundancy between sufA, iscA and erpA.

Investigating Redundancies under Anaerobic Conditions

The above results showed that the double iscA sufA and the single erpA mutants are each unable to grow under aerobiosis but fully viable under anaerobiosis. To test the hypothesis that, under anaerobiosis, the erpA gene compensates for the lack of iscA and sufA, we transduced the erpA::cat mutation into the sufA iscA strain. This proved to be impossible unless the iscA sufA recipient contained the MVA pathway and the transductants were selected in the presence of mevalonate (data not shown). Moreover, the triple mutant erpA iscA sufA MVA+ could grow aerobically and anaerobically only in the presence of mevalonate (Table 4). This showed that the growth of the iscA sufA mutant under anaerobiosis depended upon the presence of a functional copy of the erpA gene.

Conversely, we tested whether iscA and/or sufA was required for the anaerobic growth of the erpA mutant. First, the erpA sufA strain was found to be viable since we could transduce the erpA::cat mutation into DV701 (ΔsufA). Moreover, an erpA sufA MVA+ strain was able to grow anaerobically even in the absence of mevalonate (Table 4). Second, in contrast to sufA::kan, the iscA::cat mutation could not be transduced into the erpA strain unless it contained the MVA pathway and only if transductants were selected in the presence of mevalonate. The growth of the iscA erpA MVA+ strain was totally dependent on the addition of mevalonate in the medium (Table 4). This showed that a functional copy of the iscA gene was absolutely required for the anaerobic growth of the erpA mutant whereas sufA appeared to be dispensable.

Because the inactivation of the ispG or the ispH gene is lethal in anaerobiosis, these results showed that ErpA and IscA were both able to ensure enough IspG/H maturation to produce sufficient IPP to sustain growth (Paths 4 and 7 in Figure 3A). Thus, ErpA and IscA are redundant under anaerobiosis.

Figure 3
Model for Fe/S trafficking leading to IspG/H maturation in E. coli.

Extragenic Suppressors Strengthen the Functional Connection between iscA, sufA, and erpA Genes

Searching for genetic suppressors has long been a rewarding strategy for revealing functional overlap between different cellular components or pathways. We therefore used the mevalonate dependency of the strains lacking a combination of ATC encoding genes to isolate second site mutations that would render them mevalonate independent for growth.

First, we searched for secondary mutations that could suppress the double iscA sufA mutant. We used strain DV1145 (sufA iscA MVA+), which is mevalonate dependent for growth under aerobiosis, to select and analyze four revertants that could grow in the absence of mevalonate. The mutations that rendered strain DV1145 mevalonate independent were first localized by Hfr mapping and, second, by using a series of Tn10 containing strains as donors in P1 transduction experiments (Materials and Methods). One suppressor mutation, referred to as supSI-1, was unexpectedly found within the erpA gene and led to a glycine-to-valine substitution at position 89 in the C-terminal part of the protein. There are several foreseeable possibilities to account for this by-pass, among which a gained (or optimized) ability to acquire Fe/S from natural (Path 3 in Figure 3A) or alternative sources, or, symmetrically, an increased ability to deliver Fe/S to IspG/H (see below, Path 7 in Figure 3A). The biochemical characterization of this variant is under way.

Second, we selected suppressors that allowed the iscA erpA::cat MVA+ strain to grow aerobically in LB in the absence of mevalonate. Three mutations, referred to as supYI-1 to 3, were found to modify the iscR coding sequence. Actually, in two independently selected suppressors (supYI-1, supYI-2), a single mutation changed the highly conserved Ile-37 residue to Val. The supYI-3 mutant contained a His to Asn change at position 107. Interestingly, transducing a sufA but not sufB or sufCD mutation into any of these three iscA erpA iscR(supYI) mutants abolished colony formation on LB plates unless mevalonate was added, indicating that the suppressive effect of the iscR mutant alleles depended on an active sufA gene. Moreover, the expression of a Psuf+::lacZ gene fusion (see Materials and Methods) was found to be induced in the presence of the supYI suppressor mutation (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicated that suppression of the mevalonate-dependence of the iscA erpA mutant was due to an increased expression of the IscR-activated suf operon, hence an increase in SufA protein synthesis (Path 5 in Figure 3A).

A fourth revertant (supYI-4) was found to be a single G-to-T substitution at position −27 in the promoter sequence of sufA. Remarkably, this mutation altered the putative binding site for the Fur repressor. A possibility was that this mutation led to a derepression of the suf operon, thereby increasing SufA protein synthesis (Path 5 in Figure 3A). This hypothesis was confirmed by fusing this mutant promoter sequence to a lacZ reporter gene (see Materials and Methods): the expression level of Psuf(supYI-4)::lacZ in a wild type genetic context was about 150-fold higher than the expression level of the Psuf+::lacZ fusion.

Overall, this hunt for extragenic suppressors fully confirmed that the three genes iscA, sufA and erpA are interchangeable. These data also revealed that, in vivo, one barrier to full functional redundancy lies in gene expression control.

Analysis of ATC Redundancy via a Multicopy Suppressor Approach

The genetic analysis above suggested that increased synthesis of a given ATC protein could create bypasses, compensating for the loss of the others. We therefore investigated the potential redundancies between ErpA, IscA and SufA by a multicopy suppressor approach. Likewise, the iscA and sufA genes were each cloned under the control of the Para promoter in the pBAD vector, and the resulting plasmids were tested for their ability to suppress the lethality caused by the erpA mutation under aerobiosis. The pLAS-A plasmid (SufA overproducer) suppressed the growth defect of strain LL402 (erpA), although not with wild type efficiency (Table 5). In contrast, the pLAI-A plasmid (IscA overproducer) was unable to suppress the erpA mutant's lethal phenotype (data not shown). A series of additional genetic experiments further strengthened the notion of a difference between IscA and SufA. For instance, transduction experiments showed that the otherwise lethal erpA::cat mutation could be transduced into MG1655 under aerobiosis if the recipient carried the pLAS-A plasmid, whereas no transductants were obtained if MG1655 carried pLAI-A (data not shown). Also, a genomic E. coli pUC-based library was screened for plasmids able to restore the growth of the ΔerpA mutant under aerobiosis. Of nine suppressing plasmids recovered, five carried the erpA gene, four carried the sufA gene, but none carried iscA (data not shown). These studies indicated that increased sufA gene dosage was able to sustain the aerobic growth of an erpA mutant (Path 5 in Figure 3A).

Table 5
Multicopy of sufA suppresses the phenotype of the iscA erpA double mutant via IscU or via the SUF system.

Conversely, we tested whether increased erpA gene dosage was able to suppress the lethality of the iscA sufA mutant. Strain DV731 (iscA sufA MVA+) was grown in the presence of mevalonate and transformed with plasmid pLAE-A (ErpA overproducer). The transformants became able to grow under aerobiosis, even in the absence of added mevalonate (Table 5). Moreover, we were able to transduce the iscA::cat allele into strain DV701 (ΔsufA) carrying plasmid pLAE-A. Thus, these results indicate that ErpA, when overproduced, compensates for the defect of IPP synthesis due to the simultaneous absence of both SufA and IscA under aerobic conditions (Path 3 or 7 in Figure 3A).

S. cerevisiae encodes two ATCs, ISA1 and ISA2. Heterologous complementation was tested using the E. coli strains erpA and sufA iscA mutants. The plasmid p(Isa1) complemented sufA iscA but not erpA, like the pLAI-A plasmid carrying the E. coli iscA gene. The plasmid p(Isa2) complemented both the iscA sufA and the erpA mutants, like the pLAE-A plasmid carrying the E. coli erpA gene. These results were consistent with the classification of ISA1 and ISA2 being an ATC-II and ATC-I, respectively.

Defining Two Separate Pathways for Maturation of IspG/IspH

Both the extragenic and the multicopy suppressor approaches provided data pointing to potential interchangeability among the different ATCs that the cell can use for IspG/H maturation. We were therefore interested in defining the genetic constraints required for these suppressing effects to occur. In particular, it was of great importance to identify which component of the cellular Fe/S biogenesis system (see Introduction) was required in each of the suppression cases described above.

We thus first sought to construct a set of strains in which deletions of each suf gene were combined with deletions of each isc gene. In transduction experiments similar to those described above to assess iscA and sufA incompatibility, we found that, under aerobiosis, the ΔiscA mutation could be combined with a deletion of any of the suf genes (sufB, sufCD, sufS and sufE were tested).

Conversely, the ΔsufA mutation could be introduced without loss of viability into the iscU, iscS, fdx, hscA and hscB mutants (data not shown). On the contrary, the iscUA deletion inactivating both iscA and iscU could not be combined with any suf mutation. Likewise, the Δsuf mutation deleting the whole suf operon was not compatible with a mutation in any of the isc genes. In addition, as was the case for the combination of iscA and sufA mutations, all combinations of mutations became possible in the presence of the MVA pathway genes in the strain and the addition of mevalonate in the medium. All together, these results indicate that IscA can function with the SUF system and, conversely, SufA can function with the ISC system (Path 2 in Figure 3A), consistent with the association of ATC-II encoding genes with either the isc or the suf operon in Alpha-Proteobacteria (Figure 1).

We then tested which elements were required for sufA to act as a multicopy suppressor of the iscA erpA double mutant (Table 6). The ability of pLAS-A to suppress the iscA erpA strain remained possible even in the absence of IscU because pLAS-A suppressed the lethality of the iscUA erpA strain (Table 6). This indicated that sufA could function in the absence of the ISC system. In addition, pLAS-A could suppress the lethality of the iscA erpA strain in the absence of other suf genes, i.e. strain iscA erpA Δsuf/pLAS-A was viable (Path 5 in Figure 3A). In fact, iscA erpA suppression by pLAS-A could be abolished only in strain iscUA Δsuf erpA. These results confirmed that SufA could function, not only with its “natural” partners of the SUF system, but also with IscU in the ISC system.

Table 6
Increased erpA gene dosage suppresses the sufA iscA double mutant phenotype via IscU only.

We showed previously that the growth of the iscA sufA strain in the absence of O2 was erpA dependent, because the growth of the triple mutant iscA erpA sufA strictly depended on the presence of mevalonate (Table 3). An interesting observation was that the growth of iscA sufA in the absence of O2 was also IscU-dependent since the iscUA sufA strain (and Δsuf iscUA) was unable to grow in the absence of O2 unless mevalonate was added in the medium (Table 6). Altogether, these results indicated that the growth of the iscA sufA strain in anaerobiosis likely requires an IscU-ErpA connection (Path 3 in Figure 3A). In the absence of the suf operon, plasmid pLAE-A suppressed the lethality associated with the simultaneous inactivation of the iscA and sufA genes (Table 6). This indicated that ErpA-mediated suppression of the iscA sufA strain was Suf independent. On the contrary, ErpA-mediated suppression of iscA sufA was iscU dependent since plasmid pLAE-A lost its suppressive ability with the additional inactivation of iscU, i.e. strains iscUA sufA/pErpA or iscUA Δsuf/pErpA were inviable in the absence of mevalonate. This strengthened the hypothesis that ErpA could work with IscU (Path 3 in Figure 3) and, moreover, strongly suggested that ErpA could not use the SUF system without SufA.

Discussion

Fe/S proteins rank among the most versatile proteins throughout all living organisms. Our present understanding of the biogenesis of Fe/S clusters rests mainly on the analysis of two multiprotein systems, ISC and SUF, present in model organisms. Among these proteins, the actual cellular role and biochemical function of the ATC proteins has been the subject of some debate. Here, results from a combined phylogenomic and genetic investigation allow us (i) to trace the emergence of multiple ATCs; (ii) to position ATCs as “carriers” acting between scaffolds and apotargets and (iii) to propose a model explaining how the cell controls and exploits potential ATC redundancy to build up different Fe/S trafficking routes in order to meet changes in environmental conditions.

sufA iscA Conditional Lethality Is Most Likely Due to Insufficient Maturation of IPP Synthesizing Enzymes IspG/H

The iscA and sufA single mutants have repeatedly been found to cause marginal defects [5],[6]. However, we find here the iscA sufA double mutant to be conditional lethal in aerobiosis, in agreement with recent reports [36],[40]. In contrast, Lu et al. have found the sufA iscA double mutant to be non viable in synthetic medium but viable when aerobically cultivated in rich medium LB [35]. One reason for the discrepancy between these studies might lie in the fact that the sufA iscA strains generate survivors at a relatively high frequency when cultivated aerobically as we showed here (Table 3, Materials and Methods). Alternatively, the discrepancy might be due to differences in the genetic background: the sufA/iscA combination was found conditionally lethal in MG1655 whereas Lu et al. [35] worked with MC4100, a strain which went through multiple mutagenesis protocols [41].

The conditional phenotype of an iscA sufA mutant could formally be due to the general alteration of the SUF and ISC systems. This hypothesis, however, runs against a series of experimental observations reported in the present and previous studies: (i) analysis of the SUF system revealed the existence of various types of complexes such as SufBCD, SufSE, SufBCDSE, none of them containing SufA ([13],[42], our unpublished results); hence, a mutation in sufA is not predicted to destabilize the entire Suf complex and, indeed, mutations in sufA cause phenotypes much less severe than mutations in other suf genes; (ii) IscA was indeed found to interact with HscA and, because HscA was found to form a complex with IscSUHscB, a formal possibility is that a defect in IscA could alter the functioning of the ISC system; however, this is difficult to reconcile with the fact that a mutation in iscA causes minor phenotype, if at all, compared with mutations in other isc genes [12],[43]; (iii) control experiments allowed us to rule out the hypothesis of a polar effect of the iscA or sufA mutations on the expression of downstream isc or suf genes. Rather, we showed unambiguously in this work that insufficient synthesis of IPP is the cause of the lethality of the sufA iscA mutant. A similar lack of IPP had been put forward to account for the conditional phenotype of the erpA mutant [33]. The last steps of the synthesis of these compounds in E. coli involve two essential enzymes, IspG and IspH, which are known to contain 4Fe/4S clusters necessary for their activity [44],[45]. erpA gene expression was not altered in the sufA iscA mutant, and conversely, no decrease of iscA and sufA mRNA was observed in the erpA mutant (data not shown). Along the same lines, ispG and ispH genes expression was not altered by mutations in sufA, iscA, erpA or combinations thereof (data not shown). Therefore, we conclude that a defect in IspG/H Fe/S maturation is likely the cause of the lack of growth of iscA sufA and erpA mutants. Together with our previous characterization of ErpA, these observations reinforce the idea that IspG/H are the only Fe/S enzymes requiring ATCs essential for E. coli to survive under routine laboratory conditions, and that all three ATCs contribute to the maturation of IspG/H. Mettler et al. recently proposed that the ErpA activity was responsible for the viability of iscA sufA double mutant under anaerobiosis [40]. The present work, in which we showed the lethal phenotype of the iscA sufA erpA triple mutant, fully confirmed this interpretation.

ATC Function as Fe/S Carriers

On the basis of in vitro studies, ATCs were first proposed to act as scaffolds [46], because they were shown to bind and eventually transfer Fe/S clusters to a wide series of apotargets, including 2Fe/2S proteins like Fdx and 4Fe/4S proteins like BioB, IspG and APS reductase [33], [47][49]. Later on, this view was challenged by a series of studies reporting the ability of IscA and SufA to bind in vitro iron only, and by the proposal that they acted as iron sources in vivo [35],[50],[51]. In turn, the “iron only” hypothesis was disputed by the discovery that the as-isolated IscA protein from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans contains a 4Fe/4S cluster [52] and by a new study on E. coli SufA [53]. Last, an in vitro study showed that IscU could assist Fe/S acquisition by IscA but the reverse was not true, indicating that IscA might intervene downstream of the IscU-controlled scaffolding step [48]. Our genetic analysis in E. coli showed that maturation of IspG/H could not take place in two situations: (i) the complete absence of the three ATCs and (ii) the simultaneous absence of IscU and the SufBCD complex. Conversely, in the presence of one ATC protein and IscU or SufBCD, we were always able to find at least one experimental condition supporting IspG/H maturation. The fact that the inactivation of iscU and sufBCD is lethal is fully consistent with the proposal that SufBCD acts as a scaffold within the SUF system [30]. A remote possibility is that SufBCD is necessary for the functioning of an as yet unidentified scaffold. Furthermore, the viability of the iscU sufA and iscA sufB (or sufCD) mutants indicates that the ATC proteins intervene at a different level than IscU/SufBCD. This suggests that ATCs are unlikely to have a scaffolding function, a conclusion also reached by other authors [54]. Our results are thus in agreement with a role of the ATCs as intermediates between the Fe/S synthesis systems and the apotargets, likely as carriers of ready made clusters (Figure 3). Despite their established involvement in the maturation of Fe/S proteins in yeast, the molecular function of ISA1 and ISA2 remains obscure. In particular, their ability to bind Fe/S clusters appears uncertain [8]. Importantly, we found S. cerevisiae ATCs ISA1 and ISA2 able to complement a lack of ATCs in E. coli, hence to presumably act as Fe/S carriers. Studies are however required to test the tentative idea that ISA1/2 can fulfil in the bacterial context a function that they do not carry on in the yeast mitochondria.

Specificity and Redundancy among the ATCs

A mutant devoid of all three ATCs did not permit maturation of IspG/H. Furthermore, we were able to identify at least one experimental condition under which a single ATC could ensure apo-IspG/H maturation in the absence of the two other ATCs. Taken together, these two observations are best explained by postulating that all three ATCs are intrinsically able to mature IspG/H. The ATC proteins are thus clearly biochemically redundant, in agreement with results from the in vitro assays and the common evolutionary origin of their encoding genes.

The question then arises as to why the erpA, erpA sufA and iscA sufA mutants, which all produce at least one ATC, could not mature IspG/H under aerobiosis but could do so under anaerobiosis. One possibility is that under aerobiosis, the cellular need in IPP exceeds that under anaerobiosis and that the concentration of active IspG/H in these mutants is below the critical minimal level necessary for growth. The fact that overproduction of ErpA or SufA is sufficient to restore the growth of the iscA sufA or iscA erpA mutants, respectively, indeed supports the hypothesis that the limiting step for IPP synthesis in these mutants is the activity carried out by ATCs, namely maturation of IspG/H. However, this interpretation does not explain why oversynthesis of IscA does not allow IspG/H maturation (i.e. iscA does not act as a multicopy suppressor of the erpA mutant). This last observation indicates that, in the presence of O2, IscA does require ErpA to make active IspG/H. Hence, this leads us to propose a model in which the environment controls the specificity of partnerships. The molecular bases of this environmental control appear to lie either directly within the transfer process itself or with gene regulation. Under environmental circumstances that are harmless for Fe/S (Figure 3B), such as anaerobiosis, the IscU scaffold transfers its Fe/S to either ErpA or IscA, both of which can transfer the cluster to apo-IspG/H. In addition, ErpA can receive an Fe/S cluster from IscA. Biochemically, SufA is also potentially able to carry out this activity, but it is not synthesized in sufficiently large amounts in these conditions. A direct transfer of an Fe/S cluster from IscU to apo-IspG/H, bypassing IscA and ErpA, does not occur. When conditions are more hazardous for Fe/S cluster synthesis (Figure 3C), such as aerobiosis, IscA and ErpA cooperate to mature apo-IspG/H, presumably because of the O2-sensitivity of the direct transfer from IscA to apo-IspG/H and the poor synthesis of the SUF system. When conditions become stressful (Figure 3D), SufA recruits the whole SUF system for building up a new pathway for maturation of apo-IspG/H.

The model above derives from the interpretation of the phenotypes of mutants and of the effects of plasmids overproducing ATCs. Because we did not directly measure the level of each ATC protein, no definitive conclusion can thus be made on how efficient each ATC protein functions in a particular path in a wild type strain. For example, the transfer of Fe/S clusters from IscU to SufA was put forward to account for the viability of the iscA sufB strain. However, in this strain, the sufA gene expression is increased because of the iscA mutation: the transfer might not occur in a wild type strain with “normal” level of IscA and SufA. Moreover, showing that the proteins are present in normal amounts might not be conclusive either. For instance, a transfer from IscU to ErpA was proposed to occur in the iscA sufA strain but, again, such a transfer ought to be demonstrated to occur in the presence of a competing IscA protein. Hence, our model aims at listing all potential paths for transferring Fe/S from and to ATCs. The next challenge will be to identify conditions under which each path operates.

The ISC and SUF systems have been proposed for a long time to overlap and we showed here that they indeed share a common substrate, i.e. IspG/H. This overlap accounts for both the lethality of isc suf mutants [12],[36],[40],[55] and for the suppressing effect of overproducing the suf operon in isc mutants [12],[40]. On the other hand, recent data revealed that the maturation of Fnr is under the control of ISC only under aerobiosis [40]. Also, in Azotobacter, IscA is required for survival at high oxygen tension, implying that an Fe/S protein, essential for growth under these conditions, is specifically targeted by IscA [34]. Finally, in Azotobacter, IscU can be substituted under low oxygen tension by NifU, the scaffold of the NIF system [56]. Collectively, these observations indicate that substrate specificity might also intervene in deciding which Fe/S biogenesis pathway should be used for a given apoprotein. Clearly, more work is required to define the extent of the overlap between the Isc and Suf pathways. Solving the issue will require, in particular, the in vivo study of the maturation of a large set of Fe/S proteins, if not all, in various conditions and genetic backgrounds. Interestingly, it was recently suggested that the maturation of the 4Fe/4S proteins and 2Fe/2S proteins might follow different pathways [57].

ATCs History

The present phylogenomic study lends credence to an evolutionary scenario in which ATC originated in bacteria and were conserved in main bacterial phyla (Figure 1, circle number 0 and pink filled-in diamonds). Subsequently, Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-Proteobacteria acquired a second ATC gene via either gene duplication or horizontal gene transfer, and the two ATCs were later transferred to eukaryotes via the mitochondrial endosymbiosis. In proteobacteria and eukaryotes, ATCs were subdivided in two sub-families: ATC-I that contains the E. coli ErpA and ISA2 proteins, and ATC-II that contains the E. coli IscA and SufA and the S. cerevisiae ISA1 proteins. Based on genetic experiments, we propose that in E. coli at least, ATC-I became specialized in the transfer of Fe/S to apotargets, while the selection pressure exerted on ATC-IIs tended to keep them in close partnership with proteins of the Fe/S synthesis systems from which they receive Fe/S clusters (Figure 3). This proposal is supported by the fact that: (i) functional analysis of the E. coli system showed that Fe/S transfer does not occur between the ATC-I protein ErpA and SufBCD proteins of the SUF system, and is inefficient between ErpA and IscU (Path 3 in Figure 3); on the contrary, both E. coli ATC-II proteins IscA and SufA can function with the two systems, and (ii) the genomic context of ATC-I encoding genes is devoid of genes involved in Fe/S biosynthesis, in contrast to ATC-II encoding genes, always found associated with such genes in proteobacteria. This scenario led us to speculate that ATC-I (ErpA) intervenes at a different step from ATC-II (IscA/SufA) in the IspG/H maturation process in E. coli (Figure 3).

Perspectives

Three main conclusions can be drawn from studying E. coli as a model: (i) ATCs are essential intermediates between Fe/S biogenesis systems and targets, (ii) ATCs possess highly related biochemical properties, and (iii) the seemingly redundant repertoire of ATCs is exploited by the cell as a function of environmental conditions and possibly substrate specificity. The phylogenomic analysis uncovered a wide diversity in the distribution of ATCs. Thus, the comparison of the E. coli system with these widely diverging systems yields immediate questions, which E. coli could help to solve both as a reference and as a tool. Hereafter are listed a few situations we think might be of great interest to investigate. First, there are organisms (e.g. some Archaea, PVC, Spirochaetes, Thermotogae) that lack ATC but encode SUF or ISC components, IscU and/or SufB/D proteins, in particular. It is conceivable that the scaffold(s) of these organisms evolved in such a way that they acquired the ability to directly transfer Fe/S clusters to apotargets, or, alternatively, that other proteins carry out the function of ATCs. One way to understand these cases would be to test whether IscU from ATC-less organisms can complement the lethality of an E. coli strain devoid of ATC and identify the determinants differentiating these IscUs and E. coli IscU. Second, there are organisms having only one ATC. This latter might have conserved its ancestral ability to interact with both Fe/S biogenesis systems and apotargets. Firmicutes rank among them and it will be a feasible task to test this prediction by using Bacillus subtilis as a model. Third, there are organisms that possess multiple ATCs, but with a repertoire different from that of E. coli. This is the case of Anaebena, which has 2 ATC-IIIs in addition to two ATCs, or Rhodospirillum, which has one ATC-I, one ATC-II and one ATC-III. This raises the question whether, like E. coli, these organisms have exploited their repertoire of ATCs by dedicating some ATCs to an interaction with apotargets while other ATCs were kept in closer connection with general components such as scaffolds. ATC-IIIs represent an interesting case since they seem to have evolved to become specific for a particular target, nitrogenase. It would be interesting to know whether ATC-III also evolved to receive Fe/S solely from the NIF system.

Materials and Methods

Media and Growth Conditions

The rich and synthetic media were LB broth and M9, respectively. Glucose (0.2%), arabinose (0.2%), casaminoacids (0.2%), amino acids (0.005%), thiamine (50 µg/ml), nicotinic acid (12.5 µg/ml) and mevalonate (1 mM) were added when required. Solid media contained 1.5% agar. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: chloramphenicol (Cam) 25 µg/ml, kanamycin (Kan) 25 µg/ml, tetracycline (Tet) 25 µg/ml, spectinomycin (Spc) 50 µg/ml and ampicillin (Amp) 50 µg/ml.

Bacterial Strains, Phages, and Plasmids

All the strains are E. coli K-12 derivatives; principal strains are listed in Table 7. Strains carrying the Tn10 transposons used for co-transduction experiments were from the Singer collection [58],[59]; strain JW1674 from the Keio collection [60] kindly provided by P. Moreau, was the donor of the ΔsufA::kan mutation; the same collection provided all the other suf mutations but Δsuf::cat and all the deletions of the isc genes but iscA::cat and iscUA::cat.

Table 7
Bacterial strains and plasmids.

The iscA::cat mutation was generated in a one-step inactivation of the iscA gene as described [61]. A DNA fragment containing the cat gene flanked with a 5′ and 3′region bordering the iscA gene was PCR-amplified using pKD3 as a template and oligonucleotides iscAUP and iscADO (Table S2). Strain BW25113, carrying the pKD46 plasmid, was transformed by electroporation with the amplified linear fragment and CamR clones were selected; one of these clones was used to transduce the iscA::cat mutation into MG1655, giving strain DV698. To generate the iscUA::cat deletion, we first cloned the iscUA genes by PCR amplification from E. coli MG1655 chromosomal DNA using oligonucleotides iscU and iscA (Table S2) and subsequent insertion of the PCR product in pGEM-T deleted for the HincII restriction site by the T/A cloning method. The two genes were then disrupted by inserting the cat cassette in the coding region between the two HincII sites of iscUA. The resulting iscUA::cat disruption was then excised by restriction and the linear DNA electroporated into the BW25113/pKD46 strain; one CamR clone was used to transfer the iscUA::cat deletion into MG1655 creating strain DV1240. All mutations were introduced into strains by P1 vir transduction [62], selecting for the appropriate antibiotic resistance. The antibiotic resistance cassettes were eliminated when needed using plasmid pCP20 as described [63].

To verify that the isc and suf mutations had no polar effects, we checked that the sufE and hscA genes were correctly transcribed in the mutants. We first extracted the RNA from mutant strains grown overnight in LB medium. RNA was extracted using the SV Total RNA Isolation System according to the manufacturer's recommendations. To remove further DNA contaminations, the eluted RNA was treated with 2 units of RNase-free DNase and kept at −80°C. The amount of RNA was calculated from 260 nm absorption using a Biowave II spectrophotometer. Conversion of RNA to cDNA was performed using the SuperScript RT System from Invitrogen. For all RT reactions, 1 µg RNA was used and 100 ng random primer was added together with diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water to a final volume of 12 µl. The mixture was then incubated at 70°C for 10 min and transferred to room temperature. To continue the reverse transcription reaction, a master mix was prepared according to the manufacturers protocol, added to the RNA tube and incubated at 42°C for 1 hour, followed by a 15 min inactivation step at 70°C in a Robocycler. cDNA was kept at −80°C.

PCR were carried out in a standard PCR Master Mix reaction with 1/30 of the reverse transcription reactions and 100 ng of primers hscARevRT and hscAsensRT or sufErevRT and sufEsensRT in 10 µl final volume (Figure S2A and B). Lack of contaminating DNA from the RNA preparations was checked by performing parallel PCR reactions using RNA at a same concentration (Figure S2C). DNA products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer.

To construct the Psuf::lacZ fusions, PCR amplifications of chromosomal DNA from strains iscA erpA MVA+ and iscA erpA MVA+ sup(YI-4) were carried out using primers sufUP and sufDO (Table S2). The PCR products were digested by EcoR1 and BamHI and cloned into pRS415 [64] to construct transcriptional fusions. The fusions were introduced into the bacterial chromosome of strain DV206 (MG1655 ΔlacZ, [65]) using the RS45 phage and we verified that strains DV1294 (MG1655 ΔlacZ Psuf+::lacZ) and DV1296 (MG1655 ΔlacZ Psuf(YI-4)::lacZ) were monolysogens as described [66]. ß-galactosidase assays were carried out as described [62]. When grown in LB to OD600 about 0.5, the activity of the Psuf+::lacZ and Psuf(YI-4)::lacZ fusions was 4+/−10% and 600+/−10%, respectively.

Plasmids pLAI-A (IscA), pLAS-A (SufA) and pLAE-A (ErpA) were constructed by, first, PCR amplification from the MG1655 chromosomal DNA using the following primers: EcoIscA and XhoIscA for pLAI-A; EcoSufA and XhoSufA for pLAS-A; EcoErpA and XhoErpA for pLAE-A (Table S2). The PCR products were then digested by EcoRI and XhoI and ligated into the cognate sites of pBAD-I* (AmpR). Plasmids p(ISA1) and p(ISA2) were constructed by, first, PCR amplification from pETDuet-1(isa1) with primers T7 and XhoIsa1 or PCR amplification from pE-T3a-(isa2) with primers T7 and XhoIsa2, respectively, and subsequent T/A cloning in pGEM-T. XbaI-XhoI fragments carrying the isa1 or isa2 genes were then subcloned from the pGEM-T derivatives into the NheI/SalI sites of pBAD-I*. This allowed the synthesis ISA1 and ISA2 proteins free of mitochondrial targeting signal.

Suppressors Selection and Localization

In the presence of exogenously added mevalonate, the DV1145 strain (sufA iscA MVA+) forms tiny colonies after 24 h aerobic incubation. However, we noticed that fast growing clones were often seen in the streaks, indicating that suppressor mutations accumulated at high frequency. To select suppressors, we grew the DV1145 strain under anaerobiosis in the presence of MVA, then plated it onto LB plates that were incubated aerobically at 37°C. Plating efficiency in LB compared to mevalonate-supplemented LB was about 10−4 (Table 2). Suppressor mutants were purified twice from the LB plates after two days incubation and four independent mutants (supSI-1 to -4) were retained for further analysis. Four suppressors supYI-1 to -4 of iscA erpA::cat MVA+, occurring at a lower frequency (10−6, Table 2), were selected in a similar way.

Strains iscA erpA::cat MVA+ supYI and sufA iscA::cat MVA+ supSI were crossed with various Hfr Tn10 strains from the Wanner collection [67] kindly provided by M. Berlyn and the exconjugants were selected onto LB medium plates supplemented with Cam, Kan Tet arabinose and mevalonate. The exconjugants were then scored for their ability to grow in the absence of mevalonate, which indicated the presence of suppressor mutations. These experiments showed that the supSI-1+ allele could be transferred at a very high frequency by the HfrC strain (76% of the TetR clones were unable to grow on LB but able to grow on LB supplemented with mevalonate) but not by the P801 and B8 Hfr (none of 80 TetR clones were unable to grow on LB) indicating that the suppressor mutation was located between the transfer starts of these two later Hfr, that is 3,19 and 7,8 min on the chromosomal map. More precise localizations were obtained by the transduction of the suppressor strains with P1 stocks made on various donor strains carrying Tn10 insertions [58], selecting TetR transductant on LB plates supplemented with tetracycline and mevalonate and subsequently scoring the clones on plates devoid of mevalonate. Because we obtained TetR clones unable to grow in the absence of mevalonate, we concluded that the supSI allele was about 30% co-transducible with the zad-220::Tn10 marker (3,2 min). Suppressors supYI-1, -2 and -3 were located in the same way between the injection points of KL98 and KL14 (54.3 and 68.5 min, respectively), while supYI-4 was located between the injection points of B7 and PK19 (32 and 43.5 min, respectively). The supYI-1, -2 and -3 mutations were about 80% co-transducible with zfh-208::Tn10 (57.4 min) and supYI-4 was 30% co-transducible with zdi-925::Tn10 (38.3 min). Therefore, we PCR-amplified the erpA region from the chromosome of the supSI-1containing strain using the EcoErpA and XhoErpA oligonucleotides, and its nucleotide sequence analyzed. Similarly, the iscR region of supYI-1, -2 and -3 containing strains and the sufA region of the supYI-4 containing strain were amplified and sequenced. As control, we sequenced PCR amplifications of the regions of the parental strain used to select the suppressors.

Computational Analyses

The complete sequences of 622 prokaryotic (581 bacterial and 41 archaeal) genomes available in February 2008 were downloaded from the NCBI FTP website (ftp.ncbi.nih.gov). The HMMER package [68] and self-written scripts were then used to search for ATC homologs in these complete genomes, requiring the presence of Fe-S_biosyn domain (Iron-sulphur cluster biosynthesis, PFAM accession number PF01521, PFAM 22.0 version) [69],[70]. Alignments E-value with the Fe-S_biosyn profile less than 0.1 were considered as significant. The corresponding sequences were subsequently analyzed with the same software in order to determine the presence of additional known functional domains. Additional BLASTP/tBLASTN searches [71] were performed in complete genomes to ensure that the ATC family was exhaustively sampled and in the nr database at the NCBI to retrieve eukaryotic sequences. For each homolog, the gene context, defined as the 5 neighboring genes located upstream and downstream, was investigated using self-written scripts.

The retrieved homologous sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW 1.83 [72]. The resulting alignment was then visually inspected and manually refined using ED program from the MUST package [73]. Regions where homology between amino acid positions was doubtful were removed from the phylogenomic analyses. The phylogeny of all the prokaryotic ATC was constructed using the maximum likelihood method implemented in the PHYML software [74] with a WAG model (including an estimated proportion of invariant sites). According to the high number of sequences (911) and the small number of sites (76 positions), bootstrap analysis was not performed. An in-depth phylogenomic analysis using a more restricted sequence sampling representative of the diversity of bacterial and eukaryotic sensu stricto ATCs was performed using the bayesian approach (58 sequences, 90 positions) implemented in program MrBAYES 3.1.2 (with a mixed substitution model and a gamma law (4 rate categories) and a proportion of invariant sites to take among-site rate variation into account [75]). The Markov chain Monte Carlo search was run with 4 chains for 1,000,000 generations, with trees being sampled every 100 generations (the first 2,500 trees were discarded as “burnin”).

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Maximum likelihood tree of the A-type protein family. Because of the high number of sequences included (911) and the low number of amino acids positions used for the phylogenetic analysis, the tree is poorly resolved, especially for the most basal nodes. However, a number of monophyletic groups corresponding to ATC subfamilies can be identified. The scale bar represents the average number of substitutions per site.

(0.10 MB PDF)

Figure S2

The isc and suf mutations have no polar effect on downstream genes. Electrophoresis analysis of the PCR products obtained by amplification of the hscA (A) or sufE (B) genes using cDNA from various mutants. C) Example of control experiments for complete removal of contaminating DNA from the RNA preparations. Parallel PCR reactions were carried out using reverse reaction (RT) or RNA in a same dilution.

(0.88 MB PPT)

Table S1

Taxonomic distribution of ATC proteins. The taxonomic distribution, the accession number and type of each ATC detected in complete genomes available in February 2008 are indicated. ATC are shown in pink, ATC-I are shown in blue, ATC-II are shown in yellow, ATC-III are shown in green and proteins containing a truncated PF01521 domain and/or a PF01521 domain associated with additional domains are shown in orange. For additional details concerning the definition of ATC types, see text.

(0.05 MB PDF)

Table S2

Sequence (5′ to 3′) of the oligonucleotides used in this work.

(0.05 MB DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the FB group for discussions and Béatrice Py in particular for critical review of the manuscript. The authors also thank Michael Cashel, Richard D'Ari and Kasia Potrykus for critical review of the manuscript. Thanks are due to Roland Lill and Uli Mühlenhoff for the gift of plasmids and to Marc Fontecave group for sharing unpublished observations.

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This study was supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de la Méditerranée, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Programme Blanc CSD 8 and a CNRS ATIP grant to CB-A. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Kiley PJ, Beinert H. The role of Fe-S proteins in sensing and regulation in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6:181–185. [PubMed]
2. Fontecave M. Iron-sulfur clusters: ever-expanding roles. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2:171–174. [PubMed]
3. Zheng L, Dean DR. Catalytic formation of a nitrogenase iron-sulfur cluster. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:18723–18726. [PubMed]
4. Kennedy C, Dean D. The nifU, nifS and nifV gene products are required for activity of all three nitrogenases of Azotobacter vinelandii. Mol Gen Genet. 1992;231:494–498. [PubMed]
5. Barras F, Loiseau L, Py B. How Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae build Fe/S proteins. Adv Microb Physiol. 2005;50:41–101. [PubMed]
6. Johnson DC, Dean DR, Smith AD, Johnson MK. Structure, function, and formation of biological iron-sulfur clusters. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:247–281. [PubMed]
7. Fontecave M, Ollagnier-de-Choudens S. Iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis in bacteria: Mechanisms of cluster assembly and transfer. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;474:226–237. [PubMed]
8. Lill R, Muhlenhoff U. Maturation of iron-sulfur proteins in eukaryotes: mechanisms, connected processes, and diseases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:669–700. [PubMed]
9. Xu XM, Moller SG. Iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis systems and their crosstalk. Chembiochem. 2008;9:2355–2362. [PubMed]
10. Balk J, Lobreaux S. Biogenesis of iron-sulfur proteins in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:324–331. [PubMed]
11. Ayala-Castro C, Saini A, Outten FW. Fe-S cluster assembly pathways in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:110–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Takahashi Y, Tokumoto U. A third bacterial system for the assembly of iron-sulfur clusters with homologs in archaea and plastids. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:28380–28383. [PubMed]
13. Loiseau L, Ollagnier-de-Choudens S, Nachin L, Fontecave M, Barras F. Biogenesis of Fe-S cluster by the bacterial Suf system: SufS and SufE form a new type of cysteine desulfurase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:38352–38359. [PubMed]
14. Schwartz CJ, Djaman O, Imlay JA, Kiley PJ. The cysteine desulfurase, IscS, has a major role in in vivo Fe-S cluster formation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:9009–9014. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Flint DH. Escherichia coli contains a protein that is homologous in function and N-terminal sequence to the protein encoded by the nifS gene of Azotobacter vinelandii and that can participate in the synthesis of the Fe-S cluster of dihydroxy-acid dehydratase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:16068–16074. [PubMed]
16. Tokumoto U, Kitamura S, Fukuyama K, Takahashi Y. Interchangeability and distinct properties of bacterial Fe-S cluster assembly systems: functional replacement of the isc and suf operons in Escherichia coli with the nifSU-like operon from Helicobacter pylori. J Biochem. 2004;136:199–209. [PubMed]
17. Mihara H, Kurihara T, Yoshimura T, Esaki N. Kinetic and mutational studies of three NifS homologs from Escherichia coli: mechanistic difference between L-cysteine desulfurase and L-selenocysteine lyase reactions. J Biochem. 2000;127:559–567. [PubMed]
18. Loiseau L, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Lascoux D, Forest E, Fontecave M, et al. Analysis of the heteromeric CsdA-CsdE cysteine desulfurase, assisting Fe-S cluster biogenesis in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:26760–26769. [PubMed]
19. Yoon T, Cowan JA. Iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis. Characterization of frataxin as an iron donor for assembly of [2Fe-2S] clusters in ISU-type proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:6078–6084. [PubMed]
20. Puccio H, Koenig M. Recent advances in the molecular pathogenesis of Friedreich ataxia. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:887–892. [PubMed]
21. Cavadini P, O'Neill HA, Benada O, Isaya G. Assembly and iron-binding properties of human frataxin, the protein deficient in Friedreich ataxia. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:217–227. [PubMed]
22. Patzer SI, Hantke K. SufS is a NifS-like protein, and SufD is necessary for stability of the [2Fe-2S] FhuF protein in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:3307–3309. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Velayudhan J, Castor M, Richardson A, Main-Hester KL, Fang FC. The role of ferritins in the physiology of Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium: a unique role for ferritin B in iron-sulfur cluster repair and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:1495–1507. [PubMed]
24. Nachin L, Loiseau L, Expert D, Barras F. SufC: an unorthodox cytoplasmic ABC/ATPase required for [Fe-S] biogenesis under oxidative stress. EMBO J. 2003;22:427–437. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Layer G, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Sanakis Y, Fontecave M. Iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis: characterization of Escherichia coli CYaY as an iron donor for the assembly of [2Fe-2S] clusters in the scaffold IscU. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:16256–16263. [PubMed]
26. Yuvaniyama P, Agar JN, Cash VL, Johnson MK, Dean DR. NifS-directed assembly of a transient [2Fe-2S] cluster within the NifU protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:599–604. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Raulfs EC, O'Carroll IP, Dos Santos PC, Unciuleac MC, Dean DR. In vivo iron-sulfur cluster formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:8591–8596. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Agar JN, Krebs C, Frazzon J, Huynh BH, Dean DR, et al. IscU as a scaffold for iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis: sequential assembly of [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] clusters in IscU. Biochemistry. 2000;39:7856–7862. [PubMed]
29. Fontecave M, Choudens SO, Py B, Barras F. Mechanisms of iron-sulfur cluster assembly: the SUF machinery. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2005;10:713–721. [PubMed]
30. Layer G, Gaddam SA, Ayala-Castro CN, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Lascoux D, et al. SufE transfers sulfur from SufS to SufB for iron-sulfur cluster assembly. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:13342–13350. [PubMed]
31. Hoff KG, Silberg JJ, Vickery LE. Interaction of the iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein IscU with the Hsc66/Hsc20 molecular chaperone system of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:7790–7795. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Vickery LE, Cupp-Vickery JR. Molecular chaperones HscA/Ssq1 and HscB/Jac1 and their roles in iron-sulfur protein maturation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;42:95–111. [PubMed]
33. Loiseau L, Gerez C, Bekker M, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Py B, et al. ErpA, an iron sulfur (Fe S) protein of the A-type essential for respiratory metabolism in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13626–13631. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Johnson DC, Unciuleac MC, Dean DR. Controlled expression and functional analysis of iron-sulfur cluster biosynthetic components within Azotobacter vinelandii. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:7551–7561. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Lu J, Yang J, Tan G, Ding H. Complementary roles of SufA and IscA in the biogenesis of iron-sulfur clusters in Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 2008;409:535–543. [PubMed]
36. Butland G, Babu M, Diaz-Mejia JJ, Bohdana F, Phanse S, et al. eSGA: E. coli synthetic genetic array analysis. Nat Methods 2008 [PubMed]
37. Jensen LT, Culotta VC. Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ISA1 and ISA2 in iron homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:3918–3927. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Pelzer W, Muhlenhoff U, Diekert K, Siegmund K, Kispal G, et al. Mitochondrial Isa2p plays a crucial role in the maturation of cellular iron-sulfur proteins. FEBS Lett. 2000;476:134–139. [PubMed]
39. Kaut A, Lange H, Diekert K, Kispal G, Lill R. Isa1p is a component of the mitochondrial machinery for maturation of cellular iron-sulfur proteins and requires conserved cysteine residues for function. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:15955–15961. [PubMed]
40. Mettert EL, Outten FW, Wanta B, Kiley PJ. The impact of O(2) on the Fe-S cluster biogenesis requirements of Escherichia coli FNR. J Mol Biol. 2008;384:798–811.41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Peters JE, Thate TE, Craig NL. Definition of the Escherichia coli MC4100 genome by use of a DNA array. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:2017–2021. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Outten FW, Wood MJ, Munoz FM, Storz G. The SufE protein and the SufBCD complex enhance SufS cysteine desulfurase activity as part of a sulfur transfer pathway for Fe-S cluster assembly in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:45713–45719. [PubMed]
43. Tokumoto U, Nomura S, Minami Y, Mihara H, Kato S, et al. Network of protein-protein interactions among iron-sulfur cluster assembly proteins in Escherichia coli. J Biochem. 2002;131:713–719. [PubMed]
44. Wolff M, Seemann M, Tse Sum Bui B, Frapart Y, Tritsch D, et al. Isoprenoid biosynthesis via the methylerythritol phosphate pathway: the (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase (LytB/IspH) from Escherichia coli is a [4Fe-4S] protein. FEBS Lett. 2003;541:115–120. [PubMed]
45. Grawert T, Kaiser J, Zepeck F, Laupitz R, Hecht S, et al. IspH protein of Escherichia coli: studies on iron-sulfur cluster implementation and catalysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:12847–12855. [PubMed]
46. Krebs C, Agar JN, Smith AD, Frazzon J, Dean DR, et al. IscA, an alternate scaffold for Fe-S cluster biosynthesis. Biochemistry. 2001;40:14069–14080. [PubMed]
47. Ollagnier-de-Choudens S, Mattioli T, Takahashi Y, Fontecave M. Iron-sulfur cluster assembly: characterization of IscA and evidence for a specific and functional complex with ferredoxin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:22604–22607. [PubMed]
48. Ollagnier-de-Choudens S, Sanakis Y, Fontecave M. SufA/IscA: reactivity studies of a class of scaffold proteins involved in [Fe-S] cluster assembly. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2004;9:828–838. [PubMed]
49. Wollenberg M, Berndt C, Bill E, Schwenn JD, Seidler A. A dimer of the FeS cluster biosynthesis protein IscA from cyanobacteria binds a [2Fe2S] cluster between two protomers and transfers it to [2Fe2S] and [4Fe4S] apo proteins. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:1662–1671. [PubMed]
50. Ding H, Clark RJ, Ding B. IscA mediates iron delivery for assembly of iron-sulfur clusters in IscU under the limited accessible free iron conditions. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:37499–37504. [PubMed]
51. Ding H, Clark RJ. Characterization of iron binding in IscA, an ancient iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein. Biochem J. 2004;379:433–440. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Zeng J, Geng M, Jiang H, Liu Y, Liu J, et al. The IscA from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is an iron-sulfur protein which assemble the [Fe4S4] cluster with intracellular iron and sulfur. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;463:237–244. [PubMed]
53. Sendra M, Ollagnier de Choudens S, Lascoux D, Sanakis Y, Fontecave M. The SUF iron-sulfur cluster biosynthetic machinery: sulfur transfer from the SUFS-SUFE complex to SUFA. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:1362–1368. [PubMed]
54. Balasubramanian R, Shen G, Bryant DA, Golbeck JH. Regulatory roles for IscA and SufA in iron homeostasis and redox stress responses in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:3182–3191. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Outten FW, Djaman O, Storz G. A suf operon requirement for Fe-S cluster assembly during iron starvation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2004;52:861–872. [PubMed]
56. Dos Santos PC, Johnson DC, Ragle BE, Unciuleac MC, Dean DR. Controlled expression of nif and isc iron-sulfur protein maturation components reveals target specificity and limited functional replacement between the two systems. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:2854–2862. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Tan G, Lu J, Bitoun JP, Huang H, Ding H. IscA/SufA paralogs are required for the [4Fe-4S] cluster assembly in enzymes of multiple physiological pathways in Escherichia coli under aerobic growth conditions. Biochem J. 2009 (in press) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Singer M, Baker TA, Schnitzler G, Deischel SM, Goel M, et al. A collection of strains containing genetically linked alternating antibiotic resistance elements for genetic mapping of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1989;53:1–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Nichols BP, Shafiq O, Meiners V. Sequence analysis of Tn10 insertion sites in a collection of Escherichia coli strains used for genetic mapping and strain construction. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:6408–6411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006 0008. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:6640–6645. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Miller JH. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1972.
63. Cherepanov PP, Wackernagel W. Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene. 1995;158:9–14. [PubMed]
64. Simons RW, Houman F, Kleckner N. Improved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions. Gene. 1987;53:85–96. [PubMed]
65. Vinella D, Cashel M, D'Ari R. Selected amplification of the cell division genes ftsQ-ftsA-ftsZ in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 2000;156:1483–1492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Powell BS, Rivas MP, Court DL, Nakamura Y, Turnbough CL., Jr Rapid confirmation of single copy lambda prophage integration by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:5765–5766. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Wanner BL. Novel regulatory mutants of the phosphate regulon in Escherichia coli K-12. J Mol Biol. 1986;191:39–58. [PubMed]
68. Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, Mitchison G. The theory behind profile HMMs: Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
69. Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Hollich V, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D138–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bockler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D247–251. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. [PubMed]
72. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Philippe H. MUST, a computer package of Management Utilities for Sequences and Trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:5264–5272. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704. [PubMed]
75. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. [PubMed]
76. Campos N, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Sauret-Gueto S, Gallego F, Lois LM, et al. Escherichia coli engineered to synthesize isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate from mevalonate: a novel system for the genetic analysis of the 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis. Biochem J. 2001;353:59–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Gene
    Gene
    Gene links
  • GEO Profiles
    GEO Profiles
    Related GEO records
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Pathways + GO
    Pathways + GO
    Pathways, annotations and biological systems (BioSystems) that cite the current article.
  • Protein
    Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...