![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Alternative splicing of anciently exonized 5S rRNA regulates plant transcription factor TFIIIA 1 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, Saint Louis, Missouri 63132, USA; 2 Institut für Physikalische Biologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany 3These authors contributed equally to this work. 4Present addresses: Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA; 5Department of Biology and Zoology and the Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA. 6Corresponding author.E-mail bbarbazuk/at/ufl.edu; fax (352) 273-8624. Received September 20, 2008; Accepted January 6, 2009. Abstract Identifying conserved alternative splicing (AS) events among evolutionarily distant species can prioritize AS events for functional characterization and help uncover relevant cis- and trans-regulatory factors. A genome-wide search for conserved cassette exon AS events in higher plants revealed the exonization of 5S ribosomal RNA (5S rRNA) within the gene of its own transcription regulator, TFIIIA (transcription factor for polymerase III A). The 5S rRNA-derived exon in TFIIIA gene exists in all representative land plant species but not in green algae and nonplant species, suggesting it is specific to land plants. TFIIIA is essential for RNA polymerase III-based transcription of 5S rRNA in eukaryotes. Integrating comparative genomics and molecular biology revealed that the conserved cassette exon derived from 5S rRNA is coupled with nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Utilizing multiple independent Arabidopsis overexpressing TFIIIA transgenic lines under osmotic and salt stress, strong accordance between phenotypic and molecular evidence reveals the biological relevance of AS of the exonized 5S rRNA in quantitative autoregulation of TFIIIA homeostasis. Most significantly, this study provides the first evidence of ancient exaptation of 5S rRNA in plants, suggesting a novel gene regulation model mediated by the AS of an anciently exonized noncoding element. Recent genome-wide estimates of the alternative splicing (AS) rate of plant genes indicate that AS is more prevalent than originally expected (Reddy 2007), although substantially fewer plant genes undergo AS than has been observed for human genes. Approximately 20% of multiexon genes in several plant species, including Arabidopsis, rice, moss, and maize, are predicted to be alternatively spliced based on EST/cDNA evidence (Campbell et al. 2006; Wang and Brendel 2006; Barbazuk et al. 2008). The functional significance of almost all known and predicted plant AS events has yet to be determined; however, the results of a few functional analyses conducted demonstrate roles for AS in important plant processes such as photosynthesis, defense response, flowering, and cereal grain quality (Reddy 2007), as well as some metabolic pathways (Gorlach et al. 1995) and mRNA processing (Golovkin and Reddy 1996; Kalyna et al. 2006). Identification of conserved AS events among multiple evolutionarily distant species will prioritize AS events for functional characterization and help identify relevant cis- and trans-regulatory factors (Xing and Lee 2006; Reddy 2007; Barbazuk et al. 2008). AS events that occur within the translated regions of mRNAs may contribute to the diversity of the proteome (Stamm et al. 2005). Some splice isoforms containing a premature stop codon (PTC) are often not translated. Instead, they are targeted for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), which is an RNA surveillance system that recognizes PTC-containing mRNAs and targets them for degradation (Maquat 2004). Lewis et al. (2003) proposed that coupled AS and NMD, also termed RUST (regulated unproductive splicing and translation), may function to regulate protein expression by generating NMD-targeted isoforms. Recently, ultraconserved elements in mammals associated with cassette exons in some splicing activator SR (serine-arginine rich) proteins have been discovered, and transcript isoforms that include these conserved sequences contain PTCs and are subjected to NMD. The conserved nature of these elements in SR proteins suggests that their unproductive splicing is functionally important for the autoregulation or homeostatic control of these splicing regulators (Lareau et al. 2007; Ni et al. 2007). Conserved AS–NMD events have also been reported within SR proteins in plants (Kalyna et al. 2006). A genome-wide comparative analysis for AS events conserved between Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa sp. Nipponbare), which diverged 140–150 Mya (Chaw et al. 2004), identified a conserved cassette exon splicing event associated with highly conserved sequences within the TFIIIA gene (transcription factor for polymerase III A). In eukaryotes, 5S ribosomal RNA (5S rRNA) is transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III) and is required for the assembly of the large ribosomal subunit (Szymanski et al. 2003). TFIIIA is essential for the Pol III-based transcription of 5S rRNA. TFIIIA was the first zinc finger (ZF) protein characterized and the first protein found to bind both 5S rDNA and 5S rRNA (Engelke et al. 1980; Pelham and Brown 1980). The dual functions of TFIIIA suggest a negative feedback autoregulation model for 5S rRNA transcription (Cassiday and Maher III 2002). A few cis- and trans-factors have been implicated in the developmental regulation of the TFIIIA in Xenopus (Pfaff and Taylor 1992, 1998; Griffin et al. 2003; Penberthy et al. 2003); however, the transcriptional regulation of TFIIIA is not well understood. Post-transcriptional regulation of TFIIIA has never been reported in any species. The current analysis provides evidence of post-transcriptional autoregulation of TFIIIA in plants mediated by coupling a cassette exon AS event in TFIIIA pre-mRNA with NMD. This cassette exon is highly conserved in land plants and exhibits striking sequence and predicted secondary structure similarity to 5S rRNA. Similar to exonization of Alu elements in mammalian genomes (Sorek et al. 2002), the cassette exon may have derived from a 5S rDNA integration into the TFIIIA DNA and acquired a role in regulating TFIIIA homeostasis. Results Identification of a conserved cassette exon AS event within the TFIIIA gene of plants Five cassette exon AS events conserved between A. thaliana and O. sativa were discovered by comparative sequence analysis (Table 1; Fig. 1
Identification of a 5S-rRNA-like cis-element that coincides with the conserved cassette exon AS event The available angiosperm EST data sets provide evidence for the EI isoform of TFIIIA in many plant species (Supplemental Table 1). Cross-species EST alignment and gene structure prediction suggest the existence of the cassette exon in Selaginella moellendorffii, an early vascular plant lacking true leaves and roots that last shared a common ancestor with angiosperms over 400 Mya (Stewart and Rothwell 1993). No obvious TFIIIA ortholog was found in the green algae Chlamydomonas genome. Sequence comparison of TFIIIA orthologs suggests the occurrence of the cassette exon and its AS in all land plant species surveyed (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). Using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), we also isolated both EI and ES isoforms from the tomato and the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens (a moss), which diverged from vascular plants ~450 Mya (Rensing et al. 2008). Multiple RNA sequence alignment of all 52 available TFIIIA orthologs identified an evolutionarily conserved region (ECR) in the TFIIIA gene (Supplemental Fig. 2) that corresponds to the cassette exon of AtTFIIIA (Exon3) and OsTFIIIA (Exon4 and Exon5). It is noteworthy that this ECR exhibits greater sequence conservation than any other coding region in TFIIIA. The predicted secondary structure of the ECR bears considerable similarity to the secondary structure of plant 5S rRNA (Fig. 2
Phylogenetic analyses of 5S rRNAs and 5S-rRNA-like elements Sequence alignment (Supplemental Fig. 2C) and subsequent phylogenetic analysis shows a clear separation between the groups of 5S rRNAs and 5S-rRNA-like elements, with the sequences from P. patens and S. moellendorffii placed close to the center of the tree (Fig. 3
Coupling of the cassette exon AS event in TFIIIA mRNA and NMD The EI mRNA isoforms of AtTFIIIA and OsTFIIIA harbor a PTC within the cassette exon. Cycloheximide (CHX), a known inhibitor of the NMD pathway (Beelman and Parker 1994), was applied to Arabidopsis seedlings and its effect on the abundance ratio of the EI to ES mRNA isoforms was examined. CHX treatment resulted in an increase in the ratio of EI to ES mRNA by almost tenfold (Fig. 4
Multiple independent lines of experimental evidence further support RUST of the EI mRNA isoform. In vitro translation analysis indicated that the Arabidopsis EI mRNA isoform can produce a peptide of ~15 kDa that may correspond to a truncated TFIIIA containing only zf1-2, which is expected as a result of the PTC. The longer product that would correspond to TFIIIA(zf3-9) through an alternate translation re-initiation process (Wang and Wessler 1998) could not be detected in vitro (Fig. 5A
Molecular and physiological phenotypes of TFIIIA overexpression lines The common origin as well as the conserved alternative splicing pattern of TFIIIA genes in land plants may have important implications in both gene regulation and impact on plant fitness. To determine possible molecular and physiological consequences of perturbing the TFIIIA gene, we generated transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing EI or ES isoforms of TFIIIA and tested their ability to withstand abiotic stresses. Consistent with the hypothesis that EI mRNA undergoes unproductive splicing, the EI-overexpressing lines (EI-3 and EI-6) have no obvious phenotype compared with wild-type plants under normal, osmotic, or salt stress conditions (Fig. 6A
Among the independent transgenic lines overexpressing TFIIIA (ES isoform), three representative homozygote lines (ES-3, ES-6, ES-9) with different expression levels of the AtTFIIIA transgene were chosen for further investigation. The expression level of the transgene was the highest in ES-9 and lowest in ES-6 (Fig. 6B
Three Arabidopsis transgenic lines with different expression levels of transgenic AtTFIIIA provide an opportunity to study the functional significance of the homeostasis of TFIIIA. Under salt stress (50 mM NaCl; Fig. 7C Discussion Autoregulation of TFIIIA expression by coupling alternative splicing of the 5S rRNA-derived exon with NMD RUST has been proposed to be critical for autoregulation or homeostatic control of some splicing regulators (Lareau et al. 2007; Ni et al. 2007). In some members of the human family of splicing regulators, highly or ultraconserved elements are alternatively spliced and a strong coupling of AS and NMD in these genes is observed (Lareau et al. 2007; Ni et al. 2007). Comparative genomic analysis reveals that the most evolutionarily conserved regions in TFIIIA pre-mRNA are the 5S-rRNA-derived exonic regions, suggesting the presence of regulatory elements. We hypothesized that inclusion of a 5S-rRNA-derived exon in TFIIIA mRNA can trigger NMD (Figs. 4
The possibility that TFIIIA regulates its own splicing is very intriguing. Pairwise coexpression analysis of TFIIIA using large-scale microarray data across different tissues (http://bar.utoronto.ca/ntools/cgi-bin/ntools_expression_angler.cgi) (Toufighi et al. 2005) indicates that TFIIIA expression is highly correlated with the expression of CypRS64 (At4g32420) (R2 = 0.82) and CPSF160 (At5g51660) (R2 = 0.81; Supplemental Fig. 3). CypRS64 is a protein consisting of an N-terminal peptidyl–prolyl cis/trans isomerase domain and a C-terminal domain with many SR/SP dipeptides. CypRS64 has been demonstrated to interact with the splicing machinery in Arabidopsis and suggested to be functional in early steps of spliceosomal assembly (Lorkovic et al. 2004). CPSF160, a cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor, has been shown to interact with U2 snRNA and provides evidence for the coupling of pre-mRNA 3′ processing and splicing (Kyburz et al. 2006). While it is possible that the observed correlation of expression of TFIIIA, CypRS64, and CPSF160 may be purely circumstantial, the notion that TFIIIA itself may play some role in the splicing processes, consistent with its observed role in influencing the processing of its own pre-mRNA, warrants further investigation. The origin of 5S rRNA-derived exon within the TFIIIA gene in plants Phylogenetic analysis of 5S rRNAs and 5S-rRNA-like elements in TFIIIA (Fig. 3 In all angiosperms investigated, the cassette exon of TFIIIA contains the whole 5S-rRNA-like element (Supplemental Table 1). This suggests that some cis-element(s) within the 5S-rRNA-like element may function as exonic splicing enhancers (Tian and Maniatis 1993). The moss TFIIIA EI isoform includes only 80% of the 5S-rRNA-like element present within the TFIIIA gene. This is presumably a result of a different splice site selection, which reflects the divergent evolution of exonized 5S-rRNA within TFIIIA genes during land plant evolution. To our knowledge, this is the first reported observation of 5S rRNA, a noncoding gene, being exonized into genic sequence in plant genomes. More interestingly, the exonization of 5S rRNA occurred within its own transcription factor (TFIIIA) with high conservation among all land plants investigated. Our concerted evolutionary and functional analyses indicate that this 5S-rRNA-derived exon might have been alternatively spliced before the divergence of nonvascular and vascular plants. The conservation of 5S-rRNA-like elements as well as the alternative splicing pattern of TFIIIA genes in land plants may have played a role in the successful colonization of land by these organisms. Since water deficit and the associated osmotic stress are a major challenge for land plants, we tested the fitness of the homozygous transgenic Arabidopsis plants under osmotic stress by mannitol or salt. Indeed, a highly significant positive correlation between the molecular phenotypes and physiological phenotypes of AtTFIIIA overexpression lines was evident (Figs. 6 Methods Genome-wide identification of conserved cassette exon AS events The pseudochromosomes of Arabidopsis (Version 5) and Oryza (Version 4) were downloaded from TAIR (www.arabidopsis.org) and TIGR (www.tigr.org/tdb/e2k1/osa1). The cDNA/EST data for both species were retrieved from GenBank on August 31, 2006, according to Wang and Brendel (2006). The PASA (Campbell et al. 2006) and GMAP software (Wu and Watanabe 2005) were used to identify cassette exon events. Reciprocal best BLAST matches were used to determine the orthologous gene pairs that both contain ES events. Only the event containing the orthologous cassette exon(s) is deemed as the conserved ES event (illustrated in Fig. 1 Collection and gene structure prediction of TFIIIA orthologs The protein and nucleotide sequences of AtTFIIIA and OsTFIIIA were used to BLAST against plant genome databases at www.phytozome.net and NCBI plant EST databases to identify genomic sequences for TFIIIA orthologs. Reciprocal best BLAST matches assured the orthology of TFIIIA if possible. We also cloned and sequenced the TFIIIA genomic and cDNA sequences in tomato (DQ882178-DQ882180), Arabidopsis, and Physcomitrella patens (moss) (EU574733–EU574735). GeneSeqer (Usuka et al. 2000) was used to seek the EST supporting evidence of gene structures and AS events for TFIIIA orthologs. Phylogenetic analyses of 5S rRNA and 5S-rRNA-like elements Alignments of 5S rRNA sequences (see Fig. 2A In vitro translation of EI-mRNA of AtTFIIIA Full-length EI AtTFIIIA mRNA (GenBank AC: AY054225) was transcribed in vitro according to the RiboMAX Protocol (Promega). In vitro translation in a cell-free wheat germ extract (Promega) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. De novo synthesized proteins were labeled with 35S-L-Methionine and subjected to SDS-PAGE. The dried gels were exposed on PhosphorImager screens, and bands were visualized on a Bioimager FAS 3000 (Fuji). Cloning, expression, and purification of GST-LeTFIIIA and GST-LeTFIIIA(zf1-2) The cDNAs of LeTFIIIA and LeTFIIIA(zf1-2) were cloned into pGEX-4T-3 GST-fusion expression vector (Amersham). The constructs were transformed in Escherichia coli Rosetta2 cells (Novagen) for expression. A modified protocol from Frangioni and Neel (1993) was used to improve the solubility of active GST fusion proteins and purification. After binding of the GST fusion proteins to 50% glutathione sepharose 4B bead suspension (Amersham), the proteins were eluted upon addition of elution buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl at pH 8.8, 10 mM reduced glutathione, 0.1% Triton X, 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 μM ZnCl2). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay GST-LeTFIIIA zf(1-2) and full-length GST-LeTFIIIA were mixed with a 32P-labeled 330-bp DNA fragment comprising the 5S rRNA (GenBank accession no. X55697), respectively. The reaction mixture (containing 20 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 0.004% BPB, 0.008% 2-Mercaptoethanol, 3% glycerin) was preincubated for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were cooled on ice and loaded onto a 5% polyacrylamide gel (43:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) containing 20 mM NaOAc, 8 mM Tris, pH 8.3 adjusted with glacial acetic acid. Electrophoresis was performed in Hoefer SE600 apparatus at 50 V/cm and 4°C for 1 h. Gels were dried and exposed on PhosphorImager screens. Overexpression constructs and plant transformation The cDNAs for EI- and ES-mRNA isoforms of AtTFIIIA were amplified by RT-PCR, and the PCR products were cloned into the pCR8-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and then cloned into the pMDC32 through LR clonase recombination (Invitrogen). The cDNAs of ribosomal protein L5 (GenBank accession no. AY186611) and EI isoform with the elimination of stop codons were also cloned into p35S-BAR-FH vector with an HA-tag at the C-terminal. Plant transformation was performed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. Hygromycin- and Basta-resistant plants transformed by the pMDC32- and p35S-BAR-FH-derived constructs were validated by RT-PCR, respectively. Further screening identified T2 homozygote plants for phenotyping and quantitative RT-PCR. Plant material and growth conditions Arabidopsis Col-0 was used as control for all experiments. Two-week-old seedlings were treated with 10 μM cycloheximide for 4 h. For mannitol and NaCl treatment, one-week-old seedlings grown on vertically incubated one-half MS agar plates were transferred to one-half MS supplemented with different concentrations of mannitol or NaCl. Pictures were taken three (for mannitol) or four (for NaCl) weeks after the transfer. RNA preparation and quantitative RT-PCRs RNA was isolated from two-week-old seedlings using RNeasy Plant mini Kit (QIAGEN), and three seedlings were pooled as each of three biological replicates. SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase and oligo(dT) primer (Invitrogen) were used for synthesis of the first-strand cDNA. Combined with the same reverse primer (TGCAGACAACCTGCTTCTGA), forward primers CATTCGCTCGAGAGATCTTTTAC and CGCTCGAGGAAATAAATAGCC were used to amplify both isoforms of AtTFIIIA. TUB8 was used as reference gene in semiquantitative RT-PCR (TUB8 primers: CGTGGATCACAGCAATACAGAGCC and CCTCCTGCACTTCCACTTCGTCTTC). An Alphaimager 2200 gel doc system (Alpha Innotech) and ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) were used for PCR product (band) quantification. The final quantification was obtained after subtracting background intensity. Acknowledgments We thank Joseph Cho and Ralph S. Quatrano at Washington University (WU) for moss RNA isolation, and Kevin Lutke and Hao Peng at Donald Danforth Plant Science Center (DDPSC) for their assistance on plant transformation and screening of transgenic plants. We are indebted to Elke Reinartz for purification of recombinant proteins. We also thank Craig Pikaard at WU, Ruth Davenport at DDPSC, Detlev Riesner at Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Karen M. McGinnis at Florida State University, and Gordon Burleigh and David Oppenheimer at the University of Florida for their discussion and comments. This work was supported by awards from the National Science Foundations Plant Genome Program (DBI-0501758), The National Research Initiative (NRI) Plant Genome Program of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (CSREES) to W.B.B. (20078-35300-18460), and funds from the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. Footnotes [Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/) under accession nos. DQ882178–DQ882180, EU574733–EU574735, EU924184, EU918200, EU919737.] Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.086876.108. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007; 58():267-94.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007]BMC Genomics. 2006 Dec 28; 7():327.
[BMC Genomics. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2; 103(18):7175-80.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Genome Res. 2008 Sep; 18(9):1381-92.
[Genome Res. 2008]Plant J. 1995 Sep; 8(3):451-6.
[Plant J. 1995]Gene. 2005 Jan 3; 344():1-20.
[Gene. 2005]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Feb; 5(2):89-99.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7; 100(1):189-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Nature. 2007 Apr 19; 446(7138):926-9.
[Nature. 2007]Genes Dev. 2007 Mar 15; 21(6):708-18.
[Genes Dev. 2007]J Mol Evol. 2004 Apr; 58(4):424-41.
[J Mol Evol. 2004]Biochem J. 2003 May 1; 371(Pt 3):641-51.
[Biochem J. 2003]Cell. 1980 Mar; 19(3):717-28.
[Cell. 1980]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul; 77(7):4170-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980]Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Oct 1; 30(19):4118-26.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2002]Genome Res. 2002 Jul; 12(7):1060-7.
[Genome Res. 2002]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(12):R102.
[Genome Biol. 2004]Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Jul; 48(7):1072-8.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2007]Science. 2008 Jan 4; 319(5859):64-9.
[Science. 2008]Biochem J. 2003 May 1; 371(Pt 3):641-51.
[Biochem J. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2000 Feb; 16(2):135-9.
[Bioinformatics. 2000]BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 28; 9():219.
[BMC Bioinformatics. 2008]Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 1; 269(13):9687-92.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Plant Cell. 1998 Oct; 10(10):1733-46.
[Plant Cell. 1998]Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 May 1; 31(9):2424-33.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2003]Nature. 2007 Apr 19; 446(7138):926-9.
[Nature. 2007]Nature. 2007 Apr 19; 446(7138):926-9.
[Nature. 2007]Genes Dev. 2007 Mar 15; 21(6):708-18.
[Genes Dev. 2007]Plant J. 2006 Jul; 47(1):49-62.
[Plant J. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1999 Nov 19; 274(47):33198-201.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Plant J. 2003 Jan; 33(2):361-71.
[Plant J. 2003]Plant J. 2005 Jul; 43(1):153-63.
[Plant J. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 6; 279(32):33890-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Mol Cell. 2006 Jul 21; 23(2):195-205.
[Mol Cell. 2006]Science. 2008 Jan 4; 319(5859):64-9.
[Science. 2008]Cell. 1993 Jul 16; 74(1):105-14.
[Cell. 1993]Nature. 2006 May 4; 441(7089):87-90.
[Nature. 2006]RNA. 2007 Oct; 13(10):1603-8.
[RNA. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15; 105(15):5833-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2; 103(18):7175-80.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]BMC Genomics. 2006 Dec 28; 7():327.
[BMC Genomics. 2006]Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1; 21(9):1859-75.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Bioinformatics. 2000 Mar; 16(3):203-11.
[Bioinformatics. 2000]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(2):511-8.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 28; 9():219.
[BMC Bioinformatics. 2008]Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2006]Science. 1989 Nov 17; 246(4932):941-942.
[Science. 1989]Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 25; 18(20):6097-100.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1990]Anal Biochem. 1993 Apr; 210(1):179-87.
[Anal Biochem. 1993]