![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd α1β1 integrin and interleukin-7 receptor up-regulate the expression of RANKL in human T cells and enhance their osteoclastogenic function Centre de Recherche en Rhumatologie et Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Pavillon CHUL, and Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, QC, Canada Correspondence: F. Aoudjit, PhD, Assistant Professor, Université Laval, Centre de Recherche en Rhumatologie et Immunologie, CHUQ Pavillon CHUL, 2705 Blvd Laurier, local T1-49, Ste-Foy, QC G1V 4G2, Canada. E-mail: fawzi.aoudjit/at/crchul.ulaval.ca Senior author: Fawzi Aoudjit Received February 3, 2008; Revised March 28, 2008; Revised April 3, 2008; Accepted April 7, 2008. Abstract Activated T cells, through the production of the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) cytokine, have been implicated in the osteoclast development and bone loss that are associated with autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. However, the cellular pathways that regulate the expression of RANKL and the induction of osteoclasts are still unclear. In this study, we show that, in human effector CD4+ T cells, activation of α1β1 integrin and interleukin (IL)-7 receptor (IL-7R) up-regulates the expression and production of RANKL but has no effect on the production of interferon-γ, an inhibitor of T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Thus, both α1β1 integrin and IL-7R enhance the ability of these cells to induce the formation of osteoclasts from human monocytes. Furthermore, we found that simultaneous activation of effector CD4+ T cells via α1β1 integrin and IL-7R synergistically increases the production of RANKL and enhances their osteoclastogenic function. We also show that, although α1β1 integrin does not protect human effector CD4+ T cells from IL-2-withdrawal-induced apoptosis, it does enhance the pro-survival effect of IL-7, further emphasizing the importance of the α1β1/IL-7R synergistic effect. Together our results identify a new function of α1β1 integrin in T cells and suggest that activation of effector CD4+ T cells through α1β1 integrin and IL-7R is an important regulatory pathway in T-cell-dependent osteoclastogenesis. Further understanding of the mechanisms by which IL-7R and α1β1 integrin promote T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis will lead to new insights into the regulatory pathways of T-cell-dependent bone resorption associated with autoimmune diseases. Keywords: effector T cells, integrins, osteoclastogenesis, RANKL Introduction The homeostasis of the skeletal system depends on a balance between bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts. The ability of the immune system, through tissue-persisting activated/effector CD4+ T cells, to regulate this balance towards osteoclasts contributes to pathological bone resorption seen in chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), periodontitis and inflammatory bowel disease.1–4 This is in part attributable to the ability of activated T cells to produce the osteoclastogenic cytokine receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), which following its binding to its receptor RANK expressed on osteoclast precursors initiates the differentiation programme that leads to the formation of mature osteoclasts.1–5 Activated T cells in vitro or isolated T cells from patients with chronic inflammatory diseases such as RA produce RANKL and directly induce the development of osteoclasts from autologous monocytes used as osteoclast precursors.6,7 The development of osteoclasts is also dependent on additional cytokines such as osteoprotegerin (OPG), which can be produced by stromal cells8 OPG is a decoy receptor of RANKL and interferes with RANKL-induced differentiation of osteoclasts.2 Interferon (IFN)-γ, which can be produced by activated T cells, also blocks the RANKL/RANK signalling pathway and the subsequent formation of osteoclasts.9,10 In this context, activated T cells that produce large amounts of IFN-γ, such as in response to T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation, are unable to induce the formation of osteoclasts.9–11 In contrast, interleukin (IL)-7, which is an important cytokine in T-cell development and survival,12 has been shown to induce the development of osteoclasts through T-cell production of RANKL,13,14 suggesting that the ability of activated T cells to induce the formation of osteoclasts is probably dependent on how they are activated. It is noteworthy that most of the above studies were conducted with freshly isolated resting T cells, which are unlikely to be representative of the effector T cells found at the sites of tissue injury and which are associated with the inflammatory response. It is therefore still unclear how effector T cells are activated to potently induce the formation of osteoclasts. Integrins are α/β heterodimeric membrane proteins that mediate cell–cell interactions and cell adhesion to the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). In addition, integrins can elicit a wide variety of intracellular signals that modulate cell growth, proliferation and apoptosis.15,16 T cells express several members of the β1 integrin family, which following cellular activation mediate their attachment to the ECM.17,18 In addition, T-cell interactions with the ECM in injured tissues also regulate their effector functions. Recent studies have focused on the function of collagen-binding integrins α1β1 and α2β1, which are expressed on effector/memory T cells infiltrating the tissues.18–20 In this regard, several studies, including ours, have demonstrated that these integrins co-stimulate TCR-dependent proliferation and cytokine production and protect effector T cells from apoptosis.21–24 In addition, α1β1 integrin has been shown to be involved in the development of RA, a chronic inflammatory disease associated with bone resorption. Indeed, infiltrating T cells from the arthritic synovium of patients express high levels of α1β1 integrin25,26 and its blockade with antibodies significantly reduces the inflammatory response and the development of arthritis in animal models.27,28 Whether α1β1 integrin has a direct role in T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis has not been explored. To explore this possibility, we have examined whether activation of α1β1 integrin regulates the expression of RANKL and the ability of effector CD4+ T cells to induce the formation of osteoclasts. Furthermore, we have also examined whether IL-7 regulates RANKL expression in these cells, and whether α1β1 integrin enhances the osteoclastogenic function of IL-7, as integrins can act as co-stimulatory molecules. Our results show that ligation of α1β1 integrin with its ligand collagen IV (Coll IV) or activation of IL-7R with IL-7 up-regulates to the same extent the expression of RANKL in human effector CD4+ T cells. This is correlated with the ability of Coll IV- and IL-7-activated T cells to induce the formation of osteoclasts from monocytes. Importantly, activation of effector CD4+ T cells with both Coll IV and IL-7 led to a synergistic induction of RANKL and development of osteoclasts. Finally, we show that ligation of α1β1 integrin also augments the ability of IL-7 to protect these cells from IL-2-withdrawal-induced apoptosis. Our results indicate that α1β1 integrin and IL-7R may represent two major regulatory pathways that contribute to the osteoclastogenic function of effector CD4+ T cells and may thus be important in T-cell-dependent bone loss associated with the development of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Materials and methods Antibodies and reagents Anti-CD3 (OKT3), anti-CD28 (CD28·2), anti-CD127 (hIL-7R-M21) and isotype control monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). The anti-α1 integrin (FB12) and poly-l-lysine (PLL) were purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, CA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse mAbs were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA), Coll IV and IL-2 from Sigma (St Louis, MO), and IL-7, macrophage–colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and anti-human RANKL mAb (70525) from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Isolation of primary CD4+ T cells and generation of long-term activated lymphoblasts Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy adult volunteers were isolated on Ficoll gradients. Primary human naïve CD4+ T cells were then purified by negative selection using magnetic beads from StemCell Technologies (Vancouver, BC, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Staining with anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 mAbs and flow cytometry [fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS)] analysis indicated that more than 97% of the isolated cells were CD3/CD4 double-positive T cells. Freshly isolated blood T cells do not express the collagen-binding integrins α1β1 and α2β1 but do so after in vitro activation.18,19,24 Thus, the cells were activated with immobilized anti-CD3 (2·5 μg/ml) and soluble anti-CD28 (5 μg/ml) mAbs for 24 hr in complete RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mm/l glutamine and 100 units/ml penicillin and streptomycin. The cells were then washed, transferred to flasks and cultured for 10 more days in the presence of 20 U/ml of recombinant IL-2, which was added every 2 days. Because IL-2 down-regulates the expression of IL-7R on activated/effector T cells,29 the cells at day 10 were cultured for one more day in fresh medium in the absence of IL-2 before being used in subsequent experiments. These cells, which will be referred to as effector CD4+ T cells, are responsive to TCR activation, which leads to IL-2 and IFN-γ production. Cell surface molecule expression The expression of cell surface receptors on effector CD4+ T cells was determined by immunostaining and flow cytometry analysis. The cells were incubated on ice with 10 μg/ml of anti-α1 integrin or anti-CD127 or with control isotypic mAbs for 45 min in PBS containing 1% FBS. The cells were washed and incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse mAb for another 45 min. Cells were washed in PBS and analysed by flow cytometry using a FACScan instrument (BD Biosciences). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) The production of IFN-γ and soluble RANKL was measured using specific ELISAs from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) and Biomedica (Vienna, Austria), respectively. After 24 hr of activation, cell supernatants were harvested and loaded on an ELISA plate according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apoptosis assays Apoptosis was determined using the Annexin V-PE/7AAD detection kit from BD Biosciences. After stimulation, the cells were washed in cold PBS, and 105 cells were incubated in 1× buffer containing 5 μl of Annexin V-PE and 5 μl of 7-aminoactinomycin (7-AAD) for 15 min at room temperature, in the dark. The cells were then washed and analysed by flow cytometry using the FACScan instrument (BD Biosciences) and apoptotic cells were identified as cells that were Annexin V-positive. Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). First-strand cDNA was prepared from 1 μg of total RNA using the Thermoscript RT-PCR system from Invitrogen. RANKL and β-actin transcripts were amplified by PCR using specific primers as previously described.30 PCR reactions were performed with 1 U Taq polymerase in a total volume of 50 μl, and amplifications were carried out in a Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Ramsey, MN). The amplification for each gene was in the linear curve, i.e. under non-saturating conditions during the exponential phase. A volume of 10 μl of the reaction mixture was size-separated on a 2% agarose gel, and specifically amplified products were detected by ethidium bromide staining and UV illumination. Immunoblot analysis The cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium and stimulated in six-well plates. At the end of cultures, the cells were harvested and washed in cold PBS, and cell lysates were prepared in radio-immune precipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors as previously described.24 Cell lysates were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and analysed by immunoblot using specific anti-RANKL mAb. The blots were stripped and re-probed with control anti-actin mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) to ensure equal loading. In all experiments, immunoblots were visualized using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody followed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Osteoclastogenesis experiments The ability of RANKL-expressing effector CD4+ T cells to induce the development of osteoclasts was tested in a co-culture assay with human monocytes used as osteoclasts precursors. Human CD16-negative monocytes, which have the ability to differentiate into osteoclasts,31 were isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy volunteers by immunomagnetic negative selection (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Monocytes (1 × 105 cells) were seeded in 48-well plates and were activated with M-CSF (100 ng/ml) in alpha minimum eagle medium (αMEM) supplemented with serum and antibiotics. Shortly thereafter, effector T cells (1 × 105 cells) that had been activated or not for 12 hr with IL-7, Coll IV, anti-CD3 mAb, IL-7 + Coll IV or anti-CD3 + Coll IV were added to the monocytic cultures. Culture media and activated T cells were replaced every 2 days with fresh media and freshly activated effector T cells, respectively, as above. At the end of the experiment (day 8), osteoclast development was visualized by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After staining, multinucleated (≥4 nuclei) TRAP-positive cells were counted as osteoclasts. Results Expression of α1β1 integrin and IL-7R on effector CD4+ T cells To determine the involvement of α1β1 in T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis, we used effector CD4+ T cells generated after in vitro activation. These cells express high levels of α1 integrin, as we and others have previously shown.19,24,32 After 12 days of activation, almost 78% of the total cell population stained positive for α1 integrin, with an average mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 25·71 (Fig. 1a
α1β1 integrin and IL-7R up-regulate the expression and production of RANKL in effector CD4+ T cells To examine whether α1β1 integrin regulates RANKL gene expression, we stimulated effector CD4+ T cells with Coll IV, the ligand of α1β1 integrin, IL-7 or IL-7 + Coll IV. As shown in Fig. 2a
Similar to other tumour necrosis factor (TNF) ligands, RANKL also undergoes molecular shedding, leading to the production of a soluble form that is measured in cell supernatants.37 We therefore measured the levels of soluble RANKL and, as shown in Fig. 2(c) Activation of effector CD4+ T cells through α1β1 and IL-7R does not modulate IFN-γ production As activated T cells are known to produce IFN-γ, which is an inhibitor of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis, we verified the expression of IFN-γ in effector CD4+ T cells. As shown in Fig. 3
α1β1 integrin and IL-7R up-regulate the osteoclastogenic function of effector CD4+ T cells To examine the functional role of IL-7R and α1β1 integrin in T-cell-dependent osteoclastogenesis, we sought to determine the ability of effector CD4+ T cells activated with IL-7, Coll IV or both to induce the formation of osteoclasts as measured by the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells. As shown in Fig. 4
As TCR-activated effector T cells produce large amounts of IFN-γ, we investigated whether these cells have the ability to induce the formation of osteoclasts, and found that this is not the case (Fig. 5
Coll IV potentiates the survival effect of IL-7 Protection of effector CD4+ T cells from IL-2-withdrawal-induced apoptosis can contribute to their accumulation in inflamed tissues40,41 and thus to T-cell-mediated tissue injury, and IL-7 is known to protect T cells from this form of apoptosis.12,42–44 We therefore investigated whether ligation of α1β1 integrin with Coll IV also regulates T-cell survival or potentiates the anti-apoptotic function of IL-7. Effector CD4+ T cells were activated or not in the absence of IL-2 with IL-7, Coll IV or IL-7 + Coll IV and their apoptosis was determined. As shown in Fig. 7
Discussion The mechanisms by which effector T cells are activated to induce the formation of osteoclasts are not well understood. In the present study, we have demonstrated that α1β1 integrin, which is expressed on effector CD4+ T cells found in inflamed tissues, induces the expression of RANKL and enhances the formation of osteoclasts, thus identifying a novel role of α1β1 integrin in T-cell functions. In addition, our results extend the previously reported osteoclastogenic function of IL-7 in naïve T cells14 to human effector CD4+ T cells. More importantly, our results show that IL-7R and α1β1 integrin on these cells synergize to augment their expression of RANKL, their ability to induce the formation of osteoclasts and their survival. Together these results indicate that IL-7R and α1β1 integrin represent major regulatory pathways involved in T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Our results show that stimulation of IFN-γ-producing effector CD4+ T cells with Coll IV and IL-7 augments the levels of RANKL but does not affect the expression of IFN-γ; an inhibitor of osteoclast development. This is correlated with the ability of these activated cells to induce the formation of osteoclasts. Although they express basal levels of IFN-γ, it is likely that these levels are insufficient to prevent the formation of osteoclasts. This has also been reported with naïve T cells stimulated with phytohaemagglutinin,45 suggesting that IFN-γ-producing effector CD4+ T cells can induce the formation of osteoclasts when they are activated with stimuli that limit the production of IFN-γ. This possibility is also supported by our finding that effector CD4+ T cells activated through the TCR were unable to induce the formation of osteoclasts, despite the fact that these cells also produce RANKL. These results are in agreement with previous studies showing that activation of T cells via the TCR, which leads to the production of high levels of IFN-γ, interferes with their ability to induce osteoclastogenesis.9–11 We also examined whether activation of effector T cells through the TCR and IL-7R and α1β1 integrin enhances their osteoclastogenic function. We found that simultaneous activation of effector T cells via IL-7R and TCR led to slightly increased production of both IFN-γ and RANKL, and Coll IV/α1β1 slightly enhanced IL-7R + TCR-mediated production of RANKL but not IFN-γ. However, these cells were still unable to induce the formation of osteoclasts because of the high levels of IFN-γ produced by these T cells (data not shown). These results further indicate the importance of the IL-7R/α1β1 integrin pathway in T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Although Th1 cells have been associated with the pathogenesis of RA, an autoimmune disease associated with bone resorption, it was not possible to measure significant levels of IFN-γ in the synovial tissue.46 This suggests that, in the synovial tissue, these T cells can be activated with pro-inflammatory signals that do not lead to the production of high amounts of IFN-γ, such as through α1β1 integrin and IL-7R, as proposed herein. In this context, α1β1 integrin is expressed on effector CD4+ T cells infiltrating the synovium and has been implicated in the development of RA.25–28 Furthermore, synovial T cells from patients were also shown to express IL-7R.47 IL-7 is an important cytokine in T-cell development and survival and is produced by stromal cells found in the extracellular compartment of many tissues.12 Importantly, IL-7 levels are augmented in chronic inflammatory diseases such as RA, and IL-7 has been implicated in the activation of synovial T cells48 and in the induction of bone loss in vivo.13 Therefore, our study strongly suggests that α1β1 integrin and IL-7R could represent two major signalling pathways implicated in the regulation of T-cell-mediated bone loss associated with RA. Our results further support the notion that activation of effector T cells can occur independently of the TCR,49–51 especially in chronic inflammatory diseases such as RA, where cytokines and, as shown herein, ECM proteins can be critical in driving the activation of effector T cells. In addition to T cells, osteoblasts also produce RANKL and induce the formation of osteoclasts. In this regard, it was recently demonstrated that adhesion of human osteoblasts to collagen type I (Coll I) also up-regulates RANKL and the induction of osteoclasts.52 Together with ours, these studies identify cell–ECM interactions as important not only in cell adhesion but also in the regulation of bone resorption. We previously demonstrated that ligation of α2β1 integrin with Coll I reduces TCR- and doxorubicin-dependent expression of RANKL in Jurkat T cells.30 We have also shown that α2β1 integrin enhances the production of TCR-dependent production of IFN-γ23 and, similar to Coll IV, we found that anti-CD3 + Coll I-activated effector T cells also do not induce the formation of osteoclasts (data not shown). However, although Coll I enhanced IL-7-dependent RANKL expression in human effector CD4+ T cells, it did not enhance their ability to induce the development of osteoclasts (data not shown). The mechanisms underlying the effect of Coll I in the context of IL-7 co-stimulation are currently unknown but are not due to the up-regulation of IFN-γ. Additional experiments are required to determine how Coll I modulates T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Although α2β1 integrin is expressed along with α1β1 integrin on effector/memory T cells, its blockade had only a minor effect on the development of arthritis compared with the blockade of α1β1 integrin.27 Thus, these studies suggest that α1β1 integrin may be more important than α2β1 integrin in the regulation of T-cell-dependent bone loss. Both Coll IV and IL-7 are present in the bone tissue,48,53 and IL-7 has previously been shown to increase the adhesion of T cells to ECM proteins including Coll IV.54 Thus, during bone resorption, IL-7 can increase the adhesion of effector T cells to Coll IV, which will result in their retention in the bone tissue and to the synergistic production of RANKL. Subsequently, this will lead to the development of osteoclasts either from monocytes recruited from the periphery or from myeloid cells of the bone marrow, which will ultimately lead to bone erosion. In addition to the up-regulation of RANKL, our results also show that α1β1 integrin enhances the pro-survival function of IL-7. While Coll IV had no effect on IL-2-withdrawal-induced apoptosis of effector CD4+ T cells, it did enhance the protective effect of IL-7. This form of apoptosis occurs during the contraction phase of the immune response and protection from it has been suggested to be a critical step in the development of memory T cells as well as in the persistence of activated T cells during chronic inflammation.40,41 Our results may help to explain why synovial T cells, which were shown to be resistant to apoptosis, manage to survive in the inflamed synovium, where only minor amounts of IL-2 were detected.55,56 The role of IL-7 in T-cell survival and in the development of T-cell memory has been well studied.12,43,44 However, recent studies indicate that IL-7R alone is not sufficient for the efficient survival of effector T cells and their differentiation towards memory T cells.35,57 In contrast, α1β1 integrin has been implicated in the protection of effector T cells from apoptosis during influenza infection.58 The results of the present study suggest that it is highly possible that the functional interaction between these two receptors may be the key for long-term survival of effector/memory T cells. Thus, our results suggest that, during chronic inflammation associated with bone loss, IL-7R and α1β1 integrin signalling pathways can rescue effector/memory T cells and promote bone resorption through the up-regulation of RANKL expression. Our findings strongly suggest that β1 integrins can also provide signals that are co-stimulatory to cytokine signalling. A recent study showed that α1β1 integrin synergizes with the TNF II receptor in protecting effector CD8+ T cells from Fas-induced apoptosis.21 Thus, in addition to TCR signalling, integrins can be important modulators of cytokine signalling in T cells. In summary, we have identified a new signalling pathway composed of α1β1 integrin and IL-7R that contributes to T-cell survival and to T-cell-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Further investigation of the signalling mechanisms underlying the effects of IL-7 + Coll IV is likely to provide new insights into how T cells contribute to the T-cell-mediated bone erosion seen in autoimmune diseases. Acknowledgments This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and from the Canadian Arthritis Network Centre of Excellence to FA who is a recipient of a CIHR New Investigator award. SG is a recipient of a scholarship from the Canadian Arthritis Network Centre of Excellence. Abbreviations
References 1. Haynes DR, Crotti TN, Loric M, Bain GI, Atkins GJ, Findlay DM. Osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) regulate osteoclast formation by cells in the human rheumatoid arthritic joint. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40:623–30. [PubMed] 2. Theill LE, Boyle WJ, Penninger JM. RANK-L and RANK: T cells, bone loss, and mammalian evolution. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:795–823. [PubMed] 3. Teng YT, Nguyen H, Gao X, Kong YY, Gorczynski RM, Singh B, Ellen RP, Penninger JM. Functional human T-cell immunity and osteoprotegerin ligand control alveolar bone destruction in periodontal infection. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:R59–67. [PubMed] 4. Byrne FR, Morony S, Warmington K, et al. CD4 + CD45RBHi T cell transfer induced colitis in mice is accompanied by osteopenia which is treatable with recombinant human osteoprotegerin. Gut. 2005;54:78–86. [PubMed] 5. Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I, et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature. 1999;397:315–23. [PubMed] 6. Miranda-Carus ME, Benito-Miguel M, Balsa A, Cobo-Ibanez T, Perez de Ayala C, Pascual-Salcedo D, Martin-Mola E. Peripheral blood T lymphocytes from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis express RANKL and interleukin-15 on the cell surface and promote osteoclastogenesis in autologous monocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1151–64. [PubMed] 7. Kotake S, Udagawa N, Hakoda M, et al. Activated human T cells directly induce osteoclastogenesis from human monocytes: possible role of T cells in bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:1003–12. [PubMed] 8. Brandstrom H, Bjorkman T, Ljunggren O. Regulation of osteoprotegerin secretion from primary cultures of human bone marrow stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;280:831–5. [PubMed] 9. Takayanagi H, Ogasawara K, Hida S, et al. T-cell-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis by signalling cross-talk between RANKL and IFN-gamma. Nature. 2000;408:600–5. [PubMed] 10. Fox SW, Chambers TJ. Interferon-gamma directly inhibits TRANCE-induced osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276:868–72. [PubMed] 11. Wyzga N, Varghese S, Wikel S, Canalis E, Sylvester FA. Effects of activated T cells on osteoclastogenesis depend on how they are activated. Bone. 2004;35:614–20. [PubMed] 12. Jiang Q, Li WQ, Aiello FB, Mazzucchelli R, Asefa B, Khaled AR, Durum SK. Cell biology of IL-7, a key lymphotrophin. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:513–33. [PubMed] 13. Toraldo G, Roggia C, Qian WP, Pacifici R, Weitzmann MN. IL-7 induces bone loss in vivo by induction of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand and tumor necrosis factor alpha from T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:125–30. [PubMed] 14. Weitzmann MN, Cenci S, Rifas L, Brown C, Pacifici R. Interleukin-7 stimulates osteoclast formation by up-regulating the T-cell production of soluble osteoclastogenic cytokines. Blood. 2000;96:1873–8. [PubMed] 15. Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Integrin signaling. Science. 1999;285:1028–32. [PubMed] 16. Schwartz MA, Schaller MD, Ginsberg MH. Integrins: emerging paradigms of signal transduction. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995;11:549–99. [PubMed] 17. Pribila JT, Quale AC, Mueller KL, Shimizu Y. Integrins and T cell-mediated immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:157–80. [PubMed] 18. Hemler ME. VLA proteins in the integrin family: structures, functions, and their role on leukocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:365–400. [PubMed] 19. Krivacic KA, Levine AD. Extracellular matrix conditions T cells for adhesion to tissue interstitium. J Immunol. 2003;170:5034–44. [PubMed] 20. Ben-Horin S, Bank I. The role of very late antigen-1 in immune-mediated inflammation. Clin Immunol. 2004;113:119–29. [PubMed] 21. Richter MV, Topham DJ. The alpha1beta1 integrin and TNF receptor II protect airway CD8 + effector T cells from apoptosis during influenza infection. J Immunol. 2007;179:5054–63. [PubMed] 22. Rao WH, Hales JM, Camp RD. Potent costimulation of effector T lymphocytes by human collagen type I. J Immunol. 2000;165:4935–40. [PubMed] 23. Boisvert M, Gendron S, Chetoui N, Aoudjit F. Alpha2 beta1 integrin signaling augments T cell receptor-dependent production of interferon-gamma in human T cells. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:3732–40. [PubMed] 24. Gendron S, Couture J, Aoudjit F. Integrin alpha2beta1 inhibits Fas-mediated apoptosis in T lymphocytes by protein phosphatase 2A-dependent activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:48633–43. [PubMed] 25. Bank I, Roth D, Book M, et al. Expression and functions of very late antigen 1 in inflammatory joint diseases. J Clin Immunol. 1991;11:29–38. [PubMed] 26. Hemler ME, Glass D, Coblyn JS, Jacobson JG. Very late activation antigens on rheumatoid synovial fluid T lymphocytes. Association with stages of T cell activation. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:696–702. [PubMed] 27. de Fougerolles AR, Sprague AG, Nickerson-Nutter CL, et al. Regulation of inflammation by collagen-binding integrins alpha1beta1 and alpha2beta1 in models of hypersensitivity and arthritis. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:721–9. [PubMed] 28. Ianaro A, Cicala C, Calignano A, et al. Anti-very late antigen-1 monoclonal antibody modulates the development of secondary lesion and T-cell response in experimental arthritis. Lab Invest. 2000;80:73–80. [PubMed] 29. Xue HH, Kovanen PE, Pise-Masison CA, Berg M, Radovich MF, Brady JN, Leonard WJ. IL-2 negatively regulates IL-7 receptor alpha chain expression in activated T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13759–64. [PubMed] 30. Gendron S, Couture J, Aoudjit F. Collagen type I signaling reduces the expression and the function of human receptor activator of nuclear factor -kappaB ligand (RANKL) in T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:3673–82. [PubMed] 31. Komano Y, Nanki T, Hayashida K, Taniguchi K, Miyasaka N. Identification of a human peripheral blood monocyte subset that differentiates into osteoclasts. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R152. [PubMed] 32. Goldstein I, Ben-Horin S, Li J, Bank I, Jiang H, Chess L. Expression of the alpha1beta1 integrin, VLA-1, marks a distinct subset of human CD4 + memory T cells. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1444–54. [PubMed] 33. Seddiki N, Santner-Nanan B, Martinson J, et al. Expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7 receptors discriminates between human regulatory and activated T cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1693–700. [PubMed] 34. Wojciechowski S, Jordan MB, Zhu Y, White J, Zajac AJ, Hildeman DA. Bim mediates apoptosis of CD127(lo) effector T cells and limits T cell memory. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36:1694–706. [PubMed] 35. Lacombe MH, Hardy MP, Rooney J, Labrecque N. IL-7 receptor expression levels do not identify CD8 + memory T lymphocyte precursors following peptide immunization. J Immunol. 2005;175:4400–7. [PubMed] 36. Park JH, Yu Q, Erman B, Appelbaum JS, Montoya-Durango D, Grimes HL, Singer A. Suppression of IL7Ralpha transcription by IL-7 and other prosurvival cytokines: a novel mechanism for maximizing IL-7-dependent T cell survival. Immunity. 2004;21:289–302. [PubMed] 37. Kanamaru F, Iwai H, Ikeda T, Nakajima A, Ishikawa I, Azuma M. Expression of membrane-bound and soluble receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) in human T cells. Immunol Lett. 2004;94:239–46. [PubMed] 38. Dai SM, Nishioka K, Yudoh K. Interleukin (IL) 18 stimulates osteoclast formation through synovial T cells in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with IL1 beta and tumour necrosis factor alpha. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1379–86. [PubMed] 39. Yun S, Gustafsson K, Fabre JW. Suppression of human anti-porcine T-cell immune responses by major histocompatibility complex class II transactivator constructs lacking the amino terminal domain. Transplantation. 1998;66:103–11. [PubMed] 40. Strasser A, Pellegrini M. T-lymphocyte death during shutdown of an immune response. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:610–5. [PubMed] 41. Marrack P, Kappler J. Control of T cell viability. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:765–87. [PubMed] 42. Pajusto M, Ihalainen N, Pelkonen J, Tarkkanen J, Mattila PS. Human in vivo-activated CD45R0(+) CD4(+) T cells are susceptible to spontaneous apoptosis that can be inhibited by the chemokine CXCL12 and IL-2, -6, -7, and -15. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:2771–80. [PubMed] 43. Li J, Huston G, Swain SL. IL-7 promotes the transition of CD4 effectors to persistent memory cells. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1807–15. [PubMed] 44. Li WQ, Jiang Q, Khaled AR, Keller JR, Durum SK. Interleukin-7 inactivates the pro-apoptotic protein Bad promoting T cell survival. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:29160–6. [PubMed] 45. Kotake S, Nanke Y, Mogi M, et al. IFN-gamma-producing human T cells directly induce osteoclastogenesis from human monocytes via the expression of RANKL. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:3353–63. [PubMed] 46. Kotake S, Schumacher HR, Jr, Yarboro CH, et al. In vivo gene expression of type 1 and type 2 cytokines in synovial tissues from patients in early stages of rheumatoid, reactive, and undifferentiated arthritis. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1997;109:286–301. [PubMed] 47. Van Roon JA, Glaudemans KA, Bijlsma JW, Lafeber FP. Interleukin 7 stimulates tumour necrosis factor alpha and Th1 cytokine production in joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:113–9. [PubMed] 48. van Roon JA, Verweij MC, Wijk MW, Jacobs KM, Bijlsma JW, Lafeber FP. Increased intraarticular interleukin-7 in rheumatoid arthritis patients stimulates cell contact-dependent activation of CD4(+) T cells and macrophages. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1700–10. [PubMed] 49. Cope AP. Studies of T-cell activation in chronic inflammation. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(Suppl. 3):S197–211. [PubMed] 50. Cool SM, Nurcombe V. Substrate induction of osteogenesis from marrow-derived mesenchymal precursors. Stem Cells Dev. 2005;14:632–42. [PubMed] 51. Firestein GS. The T cell cometh: interplay between adaptive immunity and cytokine networks in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:471–4. [PubMed] 52. Hirai F, Nakayamada S, Okada Y, Saito K, Kurose H, Mogami A, Tanaka Y. Small GTPase Rho signaling is involved in beta1 integrin-mediated up-regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand on osteoblasts and osteoclast maturation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;356:279–85. [PubMed] 53. Nilsson SK, Debatis ME, Dooner MS, Madri JA, Quesenberry PJ, Becker PS. Immunofluorescence characterization of key extracellular matrix proteins in murine bone marrow in situ. J Histochem Cytochem. 1998;46:371–7. [PubMed] 54. Ariel A, Hershkoviz R, Cahalon L, et al. Induction of T cell adhesion to extracellular matrix or endothelial cell ligands by soluble or matrix-bound interleukin-7. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:2562–70. [PubMed] 55. Firestein GS, Xu WD, Townsend K, Broide D, Alvaro-Gracia J, Glasebrook A, Zvaifler NJ. Cytokines in chronic inflammatory arthritis. I. Failure to detect T cell lymphokines (interleukin 2 and interleukin 3) and presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1) and a novel mast cell growth factor in rheumatoid synovitis. J Exp Med. 1988;168:1573–86. [PubMed] 56. Combe B, Pope RM, Fischbach M, Darnell B, Baron S, Talal N. Interleukin-2 in rheumatoid arthritis: production of and response to interleukin-2 in rheumatoid synovial fluid, synovial tissue and peripheral blood. Clin Exp Immunol. 1985;59:520–8. [PubMed] 57. Tripathi P, Mitchell TC, Finkelman F, Hildeman DA. Cutting Edge: limiting amounts of IL-7 do not control contraction of CD4 + T cell responses. J Immunol. 2007;178:4027–31. [PubMed] 58. Ray SJ, Franki SN, Pierce RH, et al. The collagen binding alpha1beta1 integrin VLA-1 regulates CD8 T cell-mediated immune protection against heterologous influenza infection. Immunity. 2004;20:167–79. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Jun; 40(6):623-30.
[Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001]Gut. 2005 Jan; 54(1):78-86.
[Gut. 2005]Nature. 1999 Jan 28; 397(6717):315-23.
[Nature. 1999]Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Apr; 54(4):1151-64.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2006]Arthritis Rheum. 2001 May; 44(5):1003-12.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2001]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001 Jan 26; 280(3):831-5.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001]Annu Rev Immunol. 2002; 20():795-823.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2002]Nature. 2000 Nov 30; 408(6812):600-5.
[Nature. 2000]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 Oct 5; 276(3):868-72.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000]Bone. 2004 Sep; 35(3):614-20.
[Bone. 2004]Science. 1999 Aug 13; 285(5430):1028-32.
[Science. 1999]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995; 11():549-99.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995]Annu Rev Immunol. 2004; 22():157-80.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2004]Annu Rev Immunol. 1990; 8():365-400.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1990]Clin Immunol. 2004 Nov; 113(2):119-29.
[Clin Immunol. 2004]Annu Rev Immunol. 1990; 8():365-400.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1990]J Immunol. 2003 May 15; 170(10):5034-44.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2003 Dec 5; 278(49):48633-43.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 15; 99(21):13759-64.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Eur J Immunol. 2005 Dec; 35(12):3673-82.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2003 Dec 5; 278(49):48633-43.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Arthritis Res Ther. 2006; 8(5):R152.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2006]J Immunol. 2003 May 15; 170(10):5034-44.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2003 Dec 5; 278(49):48633-43.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Clin Invest. 2003 Nov; 112(9):1444-54.
[J Clin Invest. 2003]J Exp Med. 2006 Jul 10; 203(7):1693-700.
[J Exp Med. 2006]J Immunol. 2005 Oct 1; 175(7):4400-7.
[J Immunol. 2005]Immunol Lett. 2004 Jul 15; 94(3):239-46.
[Immunol Lett. 2004]Mol Immunol. 2007 Jul; 44(15):3732-40.
[Mol Immunol. 2007]Bone. 2004 Sep; 35(3):614-20.
[Bone. 2004]Eur J Immunol. 2005 Dec; 35(12):3673-82.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Nov; 63(11):1379-86.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2004]Transplantation. 1998 Jul 15; 66(1):103-11.
[Transplantation. 1998]Trends Immunol. 2004 Nov; 25(11):610-5.
[Trends Immunol. 2004]Annu Rev Immunol. 2004; 22():765-87.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2004]Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005 Aug-Oct; 16(4-5):513-33.
[Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005]Eur J Immunol. 2004 Oct; 34(10):2771-80.
[Eur J Immunol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jul 9; 279(28):29160-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Blood. 2000 Sep 1; 96(5):1873-8.
[Blood. 2000]Eur J Immunol. 2005 Nov; 35(11):3353-63.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]Nature. 2000 Nov 30; 408(6812):600-5.
[Nature. 2000]Bone. 2004 Sep; 35(3):614-20.
[Bone. 2004]Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1997 May; 109(3):286-301.
[Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1997]J Clin Immunol. 1991 Jan; 11(1):29-38.
[J Clin Immunol. 1991]Lab Invest. 2000 Jan; 80(1):73-80.
[Lab Invest. 2000]Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Feb; 62(2):113-9.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2003]Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005 Aug-Oct; 16(4-5):513-33.
[Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Apr 27; 356(1):279-85.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007]Eur J Immunol. 2005 Dec; 35(12):3673-82.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]Mol Immunol. 2007 Jul; 44(15):3732-40.
[Mol Immunol. 2007]J Clin Invest. 2000 Mar; 105(6):721-9.
[J Clin Invest. 2000]Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Jun; 52(6):1700-10.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2005]J Histochem Cytochem. 1998 Mar; 46(3):371-7.
[J Histochem Cytochem. 1998]Eur J Immunol. 1997 Oct; 27(10):2562-70.
[Eur J Immunol. 1997]Trends Immunol. 2004 Nov; 25(11):610-5.
[Trends Immunol. 2004]Annu Rev Immunol. 2004; 22():765-87.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2004]J Exp Med. 1988 Nov 1; 168(5):1573-86.
[J Exp Med. 1988]Clin Exp Immunol. 1985 Mar; 59(3):520-8.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 1985]Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005 Aug-Oct; 16(4-5):513-33.
[Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005]J Immunol. 2007 Oct 15; 179(8):5054-63.
[J Immunol. 2007]