![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 Buhles et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Anti-metastatic effects of viral and non-viral mediated Nk4 delivery to tumours 1Cork Cancer Research Centre, Mercy University Hospital, Leslie C Quick Junior Laboratory, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland Corresponding author.Alexandra Buhles: alexandrabuhles/at/yahoo.com; Sara A Collins: sara.collins/at/student.ucc.ie; Jan P van Pijkeren: vanpijkeren/at/gmail.com; Simon Rajendran: simonrajendran/at/gmail.com; Michelle Miles: mmmichelle30/at/gmail.com; Gerald C O'Sullivan: geraldc/at/iol.ie; Deirdre M O'Hanlon: deirdreohanlon/at/hotmail.com; Mark Tangney: m.tangney/at/ucc.ie Received October 29, 2008; Accepted March 9, 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract The most common cause of death of cancer sufferers is through the occurrence of metastases. The metastatic behaviour of tumour cells is regulated by extracellular growth factors such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a ligand for the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase, and aberrant expression/activation of the c-Met receptor is closely associated with metastatic progression. Nk4 (also known as Interleukin (IL)32b) is a competitive antagonist of the HGF c-Met system and inhibits c-Met signalling and tumour metastasis. Nk4 has an additional anti-angiogenic activity independent of its HGF-antagonist function. Angiogenesis-inhibitory as well as cancer-specific apoptosis inducing effects make the Nk4 sequence an attractive candidate for gene therapy of cancer. This study investigates the inhibition of tumour metasasis by gene therapy mediated production of Nk4 by the primary tumour. Optimal delivery of anti-cancer genes is vital in order to achieve the highest therapeutic responses. Non-viral plasmid delivery methods have the advantage of safety and ease of production, providing immediate transgene expression, albeit short-lived in most tumours. Sustained presence of anti-angiogenic molecules is preferable with anti-angiogenic therapies, and the long-term expression mediated by Adeno-associated Virus (AAV) might represent a more appropriate delivery in this respect. However, the incubation time required by AAV vectors to reach appropriate gene expression levels hampers efficacy in many fast-growing murine tumour models. Here, we describe murine trials assessing the effects of Nk4 on the spontaneously metastatic Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) model when delivered to primary tumour via plasmid lipofection or AAV2 vector. Intratumoural AAV-Nk4 administration produced the highest therapeutic response with significant reduction in both primary tumour growth and incidence of lung metastases. Plasmid-mediated therapy also significantly reduced metastatic growth, but with moderate reduction in primary subcutaneous tumour growth. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential for Nk4 gene therapy of metastatic tumours, when delivered by AAV or non-viral methods. Findings HGF is a heterodimeric molecule and functions include mitogenic, motogenic, morphogenic and anti-apoptotic activities [1,2]. HGF plays roles in organizing tissues during development and regeneration, but in cancer stimulates malignant cell invasive behaviour [3-5]. Nk4 consists of the N-terminus of HGF (447 amino acids of α-chain), which contains an N-terminal hairpin and four kringle domains (β-chain removed) [6]. This molecule inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis by the first kringle domain [7] and promotes anti-angiogenic activities through the competitive inhibition of binding of angiogenic growth factors to endothelial cells by its N-terminus [8]. This study describes murine trials assessing the effects of Nk4 gene therapy on the spontaneously metastatic murine LLC model when delivered to the primary tumour via plasmid lipofection or AAV2 vector. DNA constructs are shown in figure figure1.1
Tumour growth was monitored by alternate day measurements in two dimensions using a Verniers callipers. Tumour volume was calculated according to the formula V = (ab2) /6. At each time point, a two-sampled t-test was used to compare mean tumour volume within each treatment group. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft) was used to manage and analyze data. Statistical significance was defined at the standard 5% level. Figure Figure2c2cWhile both plasmid and adenoviral vectors have been utilised for Nk4 gene therapy of cancer [9-11], the short lived expression in tumours associated with these vectors may reduce therapeutic efficacy. AAV shows promise for anti-angiogenic gene therapy as it has been demonstrated that this vector can maintain gene expression for over 1 year [12-14] and elicits no cell-mediated immune response. To assess if prolonged and increased levels of expression at later time points would improve therapeutic responses, AAV2 mediated delivery of the Nk4 cassette was examined. The recombinant plasmids pAAV-Nk4 and pAAV-BB, were constructed as described in figure figure1.1 Subcutaneous LLC tumours were induced in C57 mice and at an average volume of 0.1 cm3, i.t. administered 107 particles/40 μl AAV-Nk4, AAV-BB or PBS (n = 9). Tumour volumes were measured at regular intervals and 3 mice of each group were culled at 2 time points during the trial for analysis of lung metastases. The effects of AAV particles on tumour growth are detailed in figure figure3.3
Pulmonary metastatic burden was assessed by visual counts at day 21 and 26. Mice in the control groups (BB and Untreated) showed more metastatic burden on both time points than the AAV-Nk4 treated group, and the BB group displayed increased (but statistically insignificant) metastatic burden over the untreated group (data not shown). Combined Day 26 and Day 21 measurements are shown in figures figures3d3d It has previously been reported that by day 6 post tumour inoculation, 100% LLC mice have already developed metastatic disease [15]. In our trials, the earliest possible day of AAV injection into the tumours (minimum injectable size 0.1 cm3) was day 7. Others have addressed the limitation associated with AAV delayed expression by the use of self-complementary AAV [16]. It is plausible that increased therapeutic efficacy might be observed by achieving gene expression earlier in tumour growth and spread. The AAV2/2 serotype used in our studies has only a 30% reported efficiency of transducing LLC in vitro [17]. We observed an even lower efficiency (data not shown). Administration of a higher dose of AAV particles may increase effects on tumour growth and metastasis. This notwithstanding, AAV achieved dramatically higher expression levels per gene copy than plasmid (10-3 p/sec/cm2/sr/AAVparticle vs 10-8 p/sec/cm2/sr/plasmid copy). The significant differences in effects on tumours between the Nk4 containing and Nk4-free controls, coupled with demonstration of in vivo reporter gene expression in LLC tumours, as well as in vitro Nk4 expression data, indicate that Nk4 sequences were responsible for the observed effects on tumour growth. Duration of gene expression is an important factor to be addressed in such gene therapies. It has previously been reported that slow release of NK4 plasmid DNA from cationised gelatin increases efficacy of Nk4 plasmid therapy [18]. While we did not investigate whether the superior responses observed with AAV over plasmid were as a result of increased duration or level of AAV expression, it is possible that a combination of the two systems described here may result in both immediate and long-term therapeutic expression enabled by plasmid initially, then to be superseded upon AAV activation. The nature of our LLC model meant that it was not possible to generate survival curves based on death due to metastatic disease, as trials had to be stopped at or prior to 26 days post tumour inoculation due to primary tumour size. Plasmid experiments were ceased at day 21, due to early ulceration of tumours at subsequent times in plasmid administered groups, possibly related to toxicity of lipofectamine. No such ulceration was observed in AAV administered tumours up to day 26. A tumour model permitting longer-term study of this therapy would yield further information. Given the distance from clinical reality of fast-growing murine tumour models, anti-metastatic therapy as described here may yet prove a powerful therapeutic strategy in humans, especially if applied earlier in tumour progression. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions AB performed the in vitro and in vivo experiments, and contributed to drafting the manuscript. SAC and SR aided in generation of AAV vector particles and in vivo trials. JPvP designed and aided in cloning of AAV plasmids. MM constructed AAVCMVluc. GCO'S, DMO'H and MT were the coordinators of the project. MT designed the studies and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Dr. Martina Scallan, Microbiology Dept. UCC, for use of AAV facilities. This work was funded by a grant from the Irish Cancer Society CRI07TAN, as well as the Cork South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital Breast fund and Cork Cancer Research Centre. SAC and JPvP are funded by Science Foundation Ireland. MT is funded by the Health Research Board of Ireland, SFI and ICS. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997 Oct 29; 239(3):639-44.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997]Trends Cell Biol. 1998 Oct; 8(10):404-10.
[Trends Cell Biol. 1998]Ciba Found Symp. 1997; 212():119-30; discussion 130-2, 148-54.
[Ciba Found Symp. 1997]Cancer Sci. 2003 Apr; 94(4):321-7.
[Cancer Sci. 2003]FEBS Lett. 1997 Dec 22; 420(1):1-6.
[FEBS Lett. 1997]Genet Vaccines Ther. 2007 Dec 10; 5():13.
[Genet Vaccines Ther. 2007]Cancer Gene Ther. 2002 Aug; 9(8):700-7.
[Cancer Gene Ther. 2002]Cancer Gene Ther. 2005 Dec; 12(12):954-62.
[Cancer Gene Ther. 2005]BMC Biotechnol. 2003 Sep 30; 3():16.
[BMC Biotechnol. 2003]Curr Gene Ther. 2008 Apr; 8(2):66-78.
[Curr Gene Ther. 2008]Cancer Res. 1989 Aug 15; 49(16):4509-16.
[Cancer Res. 1989]Genet Vaccines Ther. 2007 Dec 10; 5():13.
[Genet Vaccines Ther. 2007]Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Feb 1; 14(3):939-49.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2008]Gene Ther. 2004 Aug; 11(15):1205-14.
[Gene Ther. 2004]