![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 Serana et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Identification of a public CDR3 motif and a biased utilization of T-cell receptor V beta and J beta chains in HLA-A2/Melan-A-specific T-cell clonotypes of melanoma patients 1Diagnostics Department, Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy 2Immunology Laboratory, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, via delle Messi d'Oro 156, 00158 Rome, Italy Corresponding author.Federico Serana: federico.serana/at/gmail.com; Alessandra Sottini: asottini/at/libero.it; Luigi Caimi: caimi/at/med.unibs.it; Belinda Palermo: belinda.p/at/fastwebnet.it; Pier Giorgio Natali: natalipg2002/at/yahoo.it; Paola Nisticò: nistico/at/ifo.it; Luisa Imberti: limberti/at/yahoo.it Received March 3, 2009; Accepted March 24, 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Assessment of T-cell diversity, besides giving insights about the molecular basis of tumor antigen recognition, has clinical implications since it provides criteria for evaluating antigen-specific T cells clinically relevant for spontaneous and vaccine-induced anti-tumor activity. Melan-A is one of the melanoma antigens most frequently recognized by peripheral and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in HLA-A2+ melanoma patients. Many clinical trials involving anti-tumor vaccination have been conducted using modified versions of this peptide. Methods We conducted an in-depth characterization of 210 T-cell receptor beta chain (TRB) clonotypes derived from T cells of HLA-A2+ melanoma patients displaying cytotoxic activity against natural and A27L-modified Melan-A peptides. One hundred and thirteen Melan-A-specific clonotypes from melanoma-free subjects, 199 clonotypes from T-cell clones from melanoma patients specific for melanoma antigens other than Melan-A, and 305 clonotypes derived from T cells of HLA-A2+ individuals showing unrelated specificities, were used as control. After sequence analysis, performed according to the IMGT definitions, TRBV and TRBJ usage, CDR3 length and amino acid composition were compared in the four groups of clonotypes. Results TRB sequences of Melan-A-specific clonotypes obtained from melanoma patients were highly heterogeneous, but displayed a preferential usage of few TRBV and TRBJ segments. Furthermore, they included a recurrent "public" amino acid motif (Glycine-Leucine-Glycine at positions 110-112-113 of the CDR3) rearranged with dominant TRBV and TRBJ segments and, in one case, associated with a full conservation of the entire TRB sequence. Conclusion Contrary to what observed for public anti-Melan-A T-cell receptor alpha motifs, which had been identified in several clonotypes of both melanoma patients and healthy controls, the unexpectedly high contribution of a public TRB motif in the recognition of a dominant melanoma epitope in melanoma patients may provide important information about the biology of anti-tumor T-cell responses and improve monitoring strategies of anti-tumor vaccines. Background T-cell receptor (TR) plays a central role in the immune response, interacting with peptide antigens (Ags) and with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. TR alpha (TRA) and beta subunits are comprised of a variable (V) and a constant (C) amino acidic region. The TRBV region, referred according to the ImMunoGeneTics (IMGT) database [1], is encoded by V, diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments. The juxtaposition of these segments [2], the lack of precision during V(D)J gene rearrangement and the removal and/or addition of non-template encoded nucleotides at V(D)J junctions [3], create a region of hypervariability known as complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3). Despite the potentially vast T-cell repertoire, restrictions of TR composition, known as TR bias, are commonly observed [4]. These TR constraints include the preferential usage of one TRV or TRJ region without conserved CDR3, the selection of conserved amino acids (up to five) or 'motifs' at the same CDR3 specific positions, and the selection of clonal TR sequences with identical CDR3 [4]. The different individual responses to discrete Ags are manifested in terms of personal, or "private", and shared, or "public", motifs in the TR sequences [4]. A private TR repertoire describes a situation in which T cells of distinct subjects responding to the same peptide-MHC complex have no significant overlaps in their TR sequences. In contrast, TR repertoires are defined public when Ag-specific T cells in several individuals use the same TR motifs, either in the TRA or TRB chains. To date, TRA and TRB public motifs have been described in human T-cell responses directed against viral peptides [4], while, in the anti-melanoma Ag response, only public TRA motifs have been reported [5-7]. However, TRA constraints, in particular within TRAV12-1 (previously defined Vα2 or TCRAV2.1) T cells, were observed not only in melanoma patients [5-7], but also in cord blood, thymocytes and PBL of non tumor-bearing controls [5], as well as in several subjects with vitiligo [8,9]. On the contrary, no public TRB motifs were identified in the sequences of Melan-A-specific T cells of melanoma patients and controls [5-8,10-19]. The unreported identification of public TRB in anti-melanoma Ag response may be related to the use of different methodological approaches employed to obtain T-cell lines or clones and to analyze CTL activity, as well as to prepare, characterize and analyze TR sequences. Another explanation can be the low number of patients analyzed in different studies. To bypass these limitations we took advantage, in the present study, of the availability of several published and unpublished TRB sequences obtained from a number of melanoma patients in order to study different aspects of TRB chain structural constraints imposed by the melanoma Ag MART1/Melan-A (hereafter reported as Melan-A). This differentiation Ag is a membrane-embedded protein of 118 amino acids expressed both by melanocytes and melanoma cells. Among the melanoma-associated Ags identified so far, Melan-A has received particular attention because of its immune dominance in HLA-A2+ patients. A large number of T-cell clones generated from HLA-A2+ patients are cross-reactive against either the natural nonamer/decamer Melan-A peptide (26/27–38) or the Alanine-to-Leucine substituted heteroclitic Melan-A A27L peptide [20,21]. Here, we identified several melanoma/HLA-A2-restricted TRB clonotypes (sequences showing different CDR3 in a given individual), and, after the definition of a common TR nomenclature, numbering and CDR3 designation, we studied in details their molecular features. Methods The TRB sequences analyzed in this study were obtained either from previously reported or still unpublished studies. The rationale underlying selection of the 4 groups of TR sequences was to take into account three characteristics of the TR clonotypes which may generate biases in the selection of CDR3 region, i.e. Melan-A specificity, HLA-restriction and categories of individuals analyzed. Two hundred and ten Melan-A-specific clonotypes [[5-7,10-18] and manuscript in preparation], sequenced starting from T-cell lines or clones obtained from PBL and/or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) of melanoma patients ("Mel/M-A" group; Table 1), were compared with 113 Melan-A-specific clonotypes ("Ctrl/M-A" group) from healthy controls and from a subject with vitiligo [5,8,19], 199 clonotypes specific either for melanoma Ags other than Melan-A peptide or with undetermined specificity ("Mel/noM-A" group) obtained from T cells of melanoma patients [22-41], and 305 clonotypes prepared from HLA-A2+ melanoma-free patients ("Ctrl/HLA-A2+" group) selected because sequenced from T-cell lines and clones displaying CTL activity against unrelated Ags [42-54]. One hundred and seventy clonotypes of the Mel/M-A group and 85 from the Ctrl/M-A group were specific for the HLA-A2-restricted A27L-modified Melan-A peptide and their CTL activity was evaluated using a multimer-based approach [[5,6,8,12-14,17-19], and manuscript in preparation], by competition assay [15], or by analyzing the production of IL-2 in response to HLA-A2 Melan-A-expressing melanoma cell lines [7]. The remaining 40 clonotypes derived from cells of melanoma patients displayed CTL activity against natural Melan-A peptide, as demonstrated by 51Cr release assay [10,11,16]. Twenty-eight clonotypes of the Ctrl/M-A group, although specific for Melan-A peptide, were obtained from HLA-A2-negative healthy controls. Details on type of treatment, including vaccination, the starting material (peripheral blood or TIL), the experimental procedures used to obtain T-cell lines and clones or to analyze CTL activity, as well as the methodologies for TR sequencing are specified in the references included in Table 1. Before analysis, sequences available only in nucleotide form were translated into their amino acidic counterparts. All sequences analyzed in this study are supplied in the supplemental tables (additional file 1, 2, 3 and 4) showing, respectively, the clonotypes from Mel/M-A, Ctrl/M-A, Mel/noM-A and Ctrl/HLA-A2+ groups. In order to obtain uniformed information, TRBV gene family and CDR3 amino acid positions were named and numbered according to the IMGT indications http://imgt.cines.fr[55].
Statistical analysis To analyze TRBV or TRBJ segment usage, the 95% confidence intervals of the respective proportions were calculated. "Preferentially used" were defined those segments whose lower limit of the respective 95% confidence interval was higher than the mean percentage of TRBV or TRBJ transcripts usage, obtained by arbitrarily hypothesizing a uniform distribution of all segments. When proportions were compared, Fisher's exact test was employed, while the differences between the means of CDR3 length distributions in the four groups of clonotypes were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-hoc test. Results were considered significant for p < 0.05. Results Preferential TRBV and TRBJ usage in HLA-A2/Melan-A restricted response in melanoma patients We first investigated whether clonotypes identified in HLA-A2+ melanoma patients with CTL specificity against Melan-A (Mel/M-A group) had a preferential usage of particular TRBV chains and whether these preferential TRBV were also predominantly utilized in the control (Ctrl/M-A, Mel/noM-A and Ctrl/HLA-A2+ groups) clonotypes. As shown in Figure Figure1A,1A
Among Mel/M-A clonotypes there was a high number of clonotypes bearing the TRBJ2-1, TRBJ2-7 and TRBJ1-5 segments (Figure (Figure1B).1B The mean CDR3 length was highly similar (p = NS) in Mel/M-A, Ctrl/M-A and Mel/noM-A groups (mean ± SD: 12.37 ± 1.29, 12.32 ± 1.43 and 12.35 ± 1.71, respectively), but significantly lower in Ctrl/HLA-A2+ clonotypes (11.95 ± 1.50) in respect to Mel/M-A (p < 0.01) and Mel/noM-A sequences (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the majority of Mel/M-A and Ctrl/M-A CDR3 were 12 amino acid long (32.9% and 31.9% respectively), while most of CDR3 of Mel/noM-A and Ctrl/HLA-A2+ sequences were 13- and 11-amino acid-long, respectively (Figure (Figure1C1C Collectively, the present analysis demonstrated that in melanoma patients there is a biased T-cell response to Melan-A, which is characterized by TR clonotypes using preferentially TRBV28 and TRBJ1-5 segments and containing a 12-amino acid-long CDR3. Public TRB CDR3 motif within HLA-A2/Melan-A-restricted clonotypes of melanoma patients The amino acid composition of TRB hypervariable regions of Melan-A-specific CTL from melanoma patients were subsequently analyzed in detail. Serine, Glycine, Alanine and Glutamine were by far the most frequently used residues in the IMGT-defined CDR3, and were almost equally represented in all groups of analyzed sequences (Figure (Figure2A).2A
Since previous studies focusing on the analysis of shared TR amino acid sequences in humans did not address the extent to which TRB nucleotides are shared among public amino acid stretches, we identified the N-D-N regions of the 22 available nucleotide sequences of clonotypes with Glycine-Leucine-Glycine at position 110, 112 and 113. As summarized in Table 2, all N-D-N regions were different, with the only exception of those of ID D/a and ID 30 sequences, in which, however, the Adenine at the extreme 3'V region must be ascribed to the TRBV segment in clone ID D/a and to the D region in clone ID 30. Finally, the alignment of the 22 nucleotide sequences with the TRBV, TRBJ and TRBD germline gene segments allowed us to calculate the germline contribution and the number of nucleotide deletions (the so-called "nibbling") and additions during the VDJ recombination process. The exonucleolytic nibbling was highly heterogeneous: at 3' V end varied from 0 to 7 nucleotides, at 5' J end ranged from 4 to 9, at 3' D from 0 to 9 and at 5' D from 0 to 7. Similarly, N-addition was highly different at both sites ranging from 0 to 9 nucleotides at N1 and from 0 to 6 at N2 position. Finally, also TRBD region length is diverse since it varies from 3 to 8 nucleotides.
Discussion T-cells recognize peptide Ags in the context of MHC molecules through their TR, and during chronic infections, autoimmunity and alloreactivity a preferential use of particular TRA or TRB regions has been observed [4]. Therefore much effort has been put into the characterization also of tumor Ag-specific TRs. Several data demonstrated a major role of TRAV than TRBV chains in TR-Ag recognition, due to the higher number of contacts of this chain with peptides [59], and, accordingly, a preferential usage of a TRAV chain has been observed in Melan-A-specific T cells from melanoma or vitiligo patients and healthy donors [5-9]. However, this has not been considered a result of TR repertoire narrowing due to affinity focusing during Ag-driven immune responses, but to reflect a structural constraint already present in the pre-immune TR repertoire [5,9]. Differently from TRAV, the TRBV repertoire of Melan-A-specific T lymphocytes appears to be large and diverse in terms of clonal composition and TRBV region usage, as multiple clonotypic transcripts, covering the majority of the TRBV families, have been identified in HLA-A2+ patients [5-7,14,17]. Conversely, other authors reported that the recognition of melanoma Ags involved the use of T lymphocytes bearing specific TRBV chains, such TRBV5, TRBV9, TRBV19, TRBV27, and TRBV28 [16,18,23,30,35]. The different results are likely due to intrinsic limitations imposed by the limited number of patients analyzed and by the fact that the mature TR repertoire is influenced not only by the coding potential of TR VDJ regions, but also by the immunological history of the individuals. To clarify this issue, we analyzed several HLA-A2/Melan-A-specific clonotypes derived from 40 melanoma patients and we compared their features with those found in 103 other individuals including 8 subjects of Ctrl/M-A group, 36 of Mel/noM-A group and 59 of Ctrl/HLA-A2+ group. This comparative analysis indicated that T cells reacting with melanoma Ags utilize preferentially TRBV27 chain, but this segment is also predominant in clonotypes with unrelated specificity derived from HLA-A2+ individuals. On the contrary, TRBV28 chain is significantly more represented in HLA-A2+/Melan-A-specific T-cell clones obtained from melanoma patients and controls. It is of note that TRBV27 and TRBV28 chains (previously defined TCRBV14S1 and TCRBV13S1, respectively) were expressed at very low percentage when PBL of healthy individuals were analyzed by cytofluorimetry using a panel of TRBV subfamily-specific mAbs covering about 65% of TR-expressing cells [60]. Although we cannot exclude that anti-TRBV27 and anti-TRBV28 mAbs may not recognize well these TRBV chains, the overexpression of these segments in the clonotypes that we have analyzed strongly suggests that these TRBV segments are important for melanoma Ag recognition, with TRBV28 being preferentially involved in the interaction between TR and Melan-A. Looking in depth at the peculiar features of TR-Melan-A interaction, we found a biased utilization of TRBJ1-5 segment and a 3-amino acid-long Glycine-Leucine-Glycine public motif occurring in several clonotypes of melanoma patients. Further biases were the frequent association of this public motif with TRBV28 and TRBJ1-5 segments and the lack of rearrangement with members of TRBJ2 cluster. The finding of this public motif demonstrates that the discrepancy between the anti-viral and anti-melanoma Ag responses is only apparent and supports our hypothesis that the lack of common TRB constraints among patients analyzed in different studies [5-8,10-18] is likely due to the paucity of individuals studied and to the diverse technical approaches employed for the sequence analysis. Indeed, Mandruzzato et al [14] have previously identified the Glycine-Leucine-Glycine stretch, but they could not appreciate the frequency of this feature since they studied a single melanoma patient. Clones carrying recurrent motifs were present at low frequency in each patient, exception made for two patients from whom 9 and 28 clones with the same Glycine-Leucine-Glycine-containing TR were isolated [12,18], while during viral infections, public clonotypes are very frequent not only within the population, but are also sequenced in a large number in the same patient [4,43-46]. This is not surprising since most of these studies were carried out in the context of chronic, most likely lifelong, viral infections, i.e. EBV infection, where exposure to Ags is continuous and a selective pressure on T cells remains constantly high. There is not a general rule that could account for the occurrence of public T-cell responses. Some public TRB motifs have been made from near-germline recombination events, involving only few nucleotides deletion from V, D and J germline and no or minimal random nucleotide additions [61,62] but the extent of exonucleolytic nibbling and the substantial number of nucleotide additions in the public anti-Melan-A TR stretch exclude that its public nature is generated by near-germline rearrangements. Looking at the biochemical structure of the public motif identified, one may speculate that the Glycine-Leucine-Glycine stretch positioned in the central region of the CDR3, which is surrounded by hydrophilic residues, can favour the interaction with the antigenic Melan-A peptide, which has a similar central Glycine-Isoleucine-Glycine motif, with the large non polar side chain of the Isoleucine protruding extensively from the molecular surface [63]. The relevance of this and of other structural affinities in the two sequences, such as the potential interactions between the hydrophilic residues flanking their central positions, might be assessed with more confidence when further data on the recently crystallized TR-Melan-A-MHC complex [64] will be available, and the spatial relationships between Melan-A and CDR3 amino acids will became clearer. Conclusion The finding of a conserved amino acid motif in the CDR3, together with the selective use of certain TRBJ and TRBV segments, indicates an important role of the TRB chain in fine-tuning TR affinity of Melan-A-specific T cells of melanoma patients and argues against the hypothesis that high affinity TRs against self-Ags, like Melan-A, are removed during selection in the thymus or, alternatively, by tumor-induced deletion of dominant TR clonotypes [65]. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical relevance of these melanoma-associated clones, which were found not only in T-cell clones isolated from PBL but also from tumor sites, thus suggesting some lymph-node homing properties of the T cells bearing the public motif. However, whatever the function of these clonotypes is, the occurrence of this public CDR3 sequence may have implications for the tracking of tumor Ag-specific T cells in different clinical settings. In particular, sensitive molecular approaches targeting TRBV28+TRBJ1-5+ cells bearing Glycine-Leucine-Glycine motif could be designed to immune-monitor Melan-A-specific responses in melanoma patients and to investigate whether the presence of this specific motif can provide prognostic information, contributing to the design of efficient anti-melanoma vaccines. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions FS, and AS have made substantial contribution in the acquisition and alignment of sequences, in the analysis and interpretation of data, and helped to draft the manuscript. LC, BP, PGN, and PN, have been involved in drafting and critically revising the manuscript. LI conceived and coordinated the study and draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Additional file 1 Supplemental table 1. Table of TRB sequences of 210 clonotypes from Melan-A-specific T-cell lines or clones obtained from HLA-A2+ melanoma patients. Click here for file(117K, xls) Additional file 2 Supplemental table 2. Table of TRB sequences of 113 clonotypes from Melan-A-specific T-cell clones of subjects without melanoma Click here for file(73K, xls) Additional file 3 Supplemental table 3. Table of TRB sequences of 199 clonotypes from T-cell lines or clones obtained from melanoma patients with variable Ag-specificity and no known Melan-A restriction. Click here for file(110K, xls) Additional file 4 Supplemental table 4. Table of TRB sequences of 305 clonotypes from HLA-A2+ T-cell lines or clones with specificities unrelated to melanoma. Click here for file(150K, xls) Acknowledgements This work was supported by grants from ISS-ACC, Ricerca Finalizzata 2007 Fasc. N.ACC5/2, Italian Ministry of Health, Ricerca Finalizzata 2007 Fasc.7OAF4, ISS-ACC, Ricerca Finalizzata 2007 Fasc. N.ACC2/R2.6. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1; 27(1):209-12.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 1; 90(9):4319-23.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]J Exp Med. 2001 Nov 5; 194(9):1385-90.
[J Exp Med. 2001]Nat Rev Immunol. 2006 Dec; 6(12):883-94.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2003 May 15; 170(10):5103-9.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2005 Oct 1; 175(7):4797-805.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Aug; 121(2):308-14.
[J Invest Dermatol. 2003]J Immunol. 2002 Dec 1; 169(11):6253-60.
[J Immunol. 2002]J Immunol. 2003 May 15; 170(10):5103-9.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2005 Oct 1; 175(7):4797-805.
[J Immunol. 2005]Cancer Res. 1994 Oct 15; 54(20):5265-8.
[Cancer Res. 1994]J Immunol. 2002 Apr 15; 168(8):4231-40.
[J Immunol. 2002]J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Aug; 121(2):308-14.
[J Invest Dermatol. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1; 27(1):209-12.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 9; 99(14):9358-63.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Immunogenetics. 1995; 41(2-3):91-100.
[Immunogenetics. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 15; 88(14):6167-70.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]Immunogenetics. 1995; 41(2-3):91-100.
[Immunogenetics. 1995]Eur J Immunol. 2002 Nov; 32(11):3181-90.
[Eur J Immunol. 2002]J Immunol. 2003 May 15; 170(10):5103-9.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2006 Feb 15; 176(4):2330-6.
[J Immunol. 2006]Nat Rev Immunol. 2006 Dec; 6(12):883-94.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2006]Curr Opin Immunol. 2002 Feb; 14(1):52-65.
[Curr Opin Immunol. 2002]J Immunol. 2003 May 15; 170(10):5103-9.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2002 Dec 1; 169(11):6253-60.
[J Immunol. 2002]J Immunol. 2005 Oct 1; 175(7):4797-805.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Immunol. 2003 May 15; 170(10):5103-9.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Aug; 121(2):308-14.
[J Invest Dermatol. 2003]Cancer Res. 1994 Oct 15; 54(20):5265-8.
[Cancer Res. 1994]J Immunol. 2002 Apr 15; 168(8):4231-40.
[J Immunol. 2002]J Immunol. 2002 Oct 1; 169(7):4017-24.
[J Immunol. 2002]Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 Mar; 8(3):231-8.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2008]J Exp Med. 1994 Sep 1; 180(3):861-72.
[J Exp Med. 1994]J Immunol. 2001 Sep 15; 167(6):3276-84.
[J Immunol. 2001]Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2007 Sep 1; 63(Pt 9):758-60.
[Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2007]J Transl Med. 2004 Apr 8; 2(1):11.
[J Transl Med. 2004]