![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 Walduck et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Identification of novel Cyclooxygenase-2-dependent genes in Helicobacter pylori infection in vivo 1Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Schumanstrasse 21/22 10117 Berlin, Germany 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010 Australia 3Department of Hepatology, Gastroenterology, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany 4Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Preuschwitzer Strasse 101, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany 5Institute for Experimental and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany Corresponding author.#Contributed equally. Anna K Walduck: AWalduck/at/unimelb.edu.au; Matthias Weber: Matthias.Weber/at/solvay.com; Christian Wunder: wunderc/at/mail.nih.gov; Stefan Juettner: juettner/at/pathologie-ansbach.com; Manfred Stolte: prof.m.stolte/at/t-online.de; Michael Vieth: vieth.lkpathol/at/uni-bayreuth.de; Bertram Wiedenmann: bertram.wiedenmann/at/charite.de; Thomas F Meyer: meyer/at/mpiib-berlin.mpg.de; Michael Naumann: Naumann/at/med.ovgu.de; Michael Hoecker: Mihoecker/at/aol.com Received October 8, 2008; Accepted March 24, 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Helicobacter pylori is a crucial determining factor in the pathogenesis of benign and neoplastic gastric diseases. Cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) is the inducible key enzyme of arachidonic acid metabolism and is a central mediator in inflammation and cancer. Expression of the Cox-2 gene is up-regulated in the gastric mucosa during H. pylori infection but the pathobiological consequences of this enhanced Cox-2 expression are not yet characterized. The aim of this study was to identify novel genes down-stream of Cox-2 in an in vivo model, thereby identifying potential targets for the study of the role of Cox- 2 in H. pylori pathogenesis and the initiation of pre- cancerous changes. Results Gene expression profiles in the gastric mucosa of mice treated with a specific Cox-2 inhibitor (NS398) or vehicle were analysed at different time points (6, 13 and 19 wk) after H. pylori infection. H. pylori infection affected the expression of 385 genes over the experimental period, including regulators of gastric physiology, proliferation, apoptosis and mucosal defence. Under conditions of Cox-2 inhibition, 160 target genes were regulated as a result of H. pylori infection. The Cox-2 dependent subset included those influencing gastric physiology (Gastrin, Galr1), epithelial barrier function (Tjp1, connexin45, Aqp5), inflammation (Icam1), apoptosis (Clu) and proliferation (Gdf3, Igf2). Treatment with NS398 alone caused differential expression of 140 genes, 97 of which were unique, indicating that these genes are regulated under conditions of basal Cox-2 expression. Conclusion This study has identified a panel of novel Cox-2 dependent genes influenced under both normal and the inflammatory conditions induced by H. pylori infection. These data provide important new links between Cox-2 and inflammatory processes, epithelial repair and integrity. Background Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with a variety of gastric disorders including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, mucosa associated lymphatic tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma [1,2]. The pathogenicity of the bacterium is determined by epidemiological influences as well as bacterial and host factors [1,3]. Bacterial colonization of the gastric mucosa leads to development of a chronic inflammatory infiltrate, which is accompanied by enhanced release of inflammatory mediators, growth factors and reactive oxygen metabolites [2,4]. The inducible Cox-2 enzyme and its constitutively expressed isoform Cox-1 are the key regulators of human prostaglandin metabolism [5-7]. The end products of their enzymatic activity comprise a panel of prostaglandins and thromboxanes, which have been identified as critical regulators of fundamental physiological and pathological processes including platelet aggregation, parturition, T-cell development, inflammation and cancer [5-7]. Cox-2 enzymatic activity is largely regulated through de novo synthesis of Cox-2 protein [5,6]. In the stomach, enhanced Cox-2 expression has been found during H. pylori-triggered gastritis as well as in mucosal stress lesions, gastroduodenal ulcers and after ischemia/reperfusion damage [8-10]. Cox-2 and its related prostanoids also appear to contribute to the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. Gastric adenocarcinoma and premalignant mucosal lesions frequently over-express the Cox-2 gene [11-14], and elevated intratumoral Cox-2 levels seem to be associated with deeper tumor invasion [15] and an increased frequency of lymphatic metastasis [16]. In addition, Cox-2 inhibitors have been demonstrated to potently suppress proliferation of human gastric cancer cells in vitro [1,17,18] as well as experimental gastric adenocarcinomas in nude mice [17]. Recently however, a number of reports have challenged the notion that this anti- tumour activity is due to inhibition of Cox-2 itself [19]. Individuals taking Cox-inhibitors have been reported to display a reduced risk for development of gastric carcinoma [20], however the reported cardiovascular side effects associated with chronic coxib administration mean that clinical use of Cox- inhibitors for anti-carcinogenic treatment is controversial (Reviewed in[21]). Expression of the Cox-2 gene therefore appears to be an important step in the pathogenesis of benign and malignant gastric diseases and therefore, clarification not only of its contribution to H. pylori-dependent pathogenesis, but also the downstream effects of Cox inhibiting drugs is of special clinical significance. We have previously demonstrated that H. pylori can directly influence expression of Cox-2 in gastric epithelial cells through transcriptional mechanisms, and identified MAPK-ERK-dependent activation of a proximal cis-regulatory CRE-Ebox element as a key step in the H. pylori-response of the Cox-2 gene [22]. While these results further confirmed the pathophysiological link between the bacterium and Cox-2, molecular effectors located downstream of Cox-2 during gastric H. pylori infection remained unidentified. Here we analysed gene expression in the gastric epithelium of mice treated with the Cox-2 specific inhibitor NS398, at different time points after H. pylori infection using DNA microarrays and were able to define gene expression profiles regulated by H. pylori through Cox-2-dependent and independent mechanisms. Results Determination of Cox-2 inhibitor concentration To determine the appropriate concentration of inhibitor in our H. pylori infection model, PGE2 levels were measured in the gastric mucosa after H. pylori infection in the presence or absence of Cox-2 inhibition with NS398. Infected mice showed a 50% increase in PGE2 level in the gastric mucosa. Treatment of infected mice with NS398 (10 mg/kg) led to a reduction in the PGE2 such that it did not differ from the control group (data not shown). We therefore concluded that a dose of 10 mg/kg was sufficient to suppress Cox 2 activity in the presence of a H. pylori infection. Long term administration of the specific Cox-2 inhibitor NS398 does not significantly affect bacterial colonization or inflammatory scores All mice in the infected groups were colonized with H. pylori, as determined by quantitative culture. The bacterial load increased only slightly in the period between 6 and 19 weeks (Figure (Figure1A).1A
RNA from animals with similar scores and colonization levels (3 mice per group) were pooled and used to perform the three experimental comparisons: non-infected versus infected (V vs V+Hp), infected versus NS398 treated and infected (V+Hp vs NS398+Hp), and non-infected versus non-infected and NS398 treated (V vs NS398) (Figure (Figure2A).2A
Global gene expression in the gastric mucosa of H. pylori infected mice The RNA used in this study was extracted from the gastric mucosa only, and histological analyses of stomachs prepared in this way have confirmed that muscle or other connective tissue underlying the mucosa were not included in our preparations (not shown). The changes in gene expression seen in this study are therefore highly likely to reflect a transcriptional response restricted to that of gastric epithelial cells and the developing lymphocytic and granulocytic infiltrates which characterise chronic H. pylori infection. Cut-offs for significant changes in gene expression were set at p < 0.05 and three fold change [25]. In H. pylori infected mice, 385 genes passed the cut- off criteria at at least one time during the study (Figure (Figure2A).2A Infection with H. pylori induced a complex pattern of global gene expression over the period of the experiment (Figure (Figure2B).2B
Effect of NS398 on gastric gene expression profiles Previous studies on the Cox-2 inhibitor NS398 in a variety of in vitro and in vivo models have demonstrated it is a specific inhibitor of Cox-2 activity with little or no influence on the closely related, constitutively expressed Cox-1 [26,27]. In our study, long-term administration appeared to have effects on gene expression that may have been resolved or compensated for after several months, as a large proportion of the genes which were up-regulated after week 6 of administration were not differently expressed after week 13 (Figure (Figure2B2B To complement the 'subtractive' method of classifying genes, data were clustered using an unsupervised approach. A self-ordering matrix (SOM) was created using all Cox-2 dependent genes, Figure Figure33
Confirmation of expression of selected Cox-2 dependent genes The mean change in expression level of Cox1 (Ptgs1) and Cox2 (Ptgs2), and a selection of Cox2-dependent genes involved in inflammation (intracellular adhesion molecule 1, Icam1; Transforming growth factor b1,Tgfb1), gastric function (Gastrin, Gast), barrier function (Aquaporin 5, Aqp5; Tight junction protein 1, Tjp1) and proliferation/carcinogenesis (Ornithine decarboxylase, Odc1) was determined for individual mice at all time points by real-time PCR (Additional File 1, Table S4). In 94% of cases the change in expression could be confirmed (up- or down- regulated over the three-fold cut off criteria). In NS398 treated mice, the expression of Tjp1 dramatically increased in the early stages of the study compared to infected mice (Figure (Figure3).3
Discussion The aim of this study was to enhance our knowledge about the role of cyclooxygenase-2 in H. pylori-triggered mucosal inflammation by identifying new downstream molecular effectors. The in vivo approach taken here has also provided insight at the transcriptome level, into the complex changes that occur as a result of the chronic inflammatory response to H. pylori infection and to Cox-2 inhibition. Both H. pylori infection, and NS398 treatment elicited unique transcriptional signatures in the gastric mucosa of mice, despite the similarity in pathology scores and colonization density between the different groups (Figure (Figure1).1 NS398 specifically inhibits the activity of the Cox-2 protein, and alterations in Cox-2 gene expression might be expected when infected mice were treated with a specific Cox-2 inhibitor, either as a result of a possible feedback mechanism involving PGE2 [29], or as a compensatory mechanism to overcome the enzymatic inhibition. No significant change in Cox-2 expression was observed in vivo however, supporting the notion that the expression of the Cox-2 gene in the stomach is controlled by a variety of factors. Cox-2 is expressed by both inflammatory and gastric epithelial cells [22] and its expression may be controlled by different mechanisms in different cells types. We were able to identify a subset of genes that were differentially expressed as a result of Cox-2 suppression, highlighting the scope of influence of Cox-inhibitors in gastric inflammation. Cox-2 dependent genes fell into numerous functional categories, chiefly those involved in gastric physiology (acid secretion, motility), epithelial repair and proliferation, and inflammatory mediators. Gastrin (Gast) is an important mediator in the stomach [30-34] and expression in the mucosa was strongly influenced, not only by infection with H. pylori, but also by suppression of Cox-2 activity (Figure (Figure3,3 Whereas expression of the apoptosis mediating growth differentiation factor 3 (Gdf3) and c-Myc (Mycs) genes peaked at week 13, the apoptosis inhibiting gene clusterin (Clu) strongly decreased at this time point. Taken together, the gene expression pattern is suggestive of a shift in the rate of proliferation/apoptosis of the epithelium after 13 weeks of infection as a result of NS398 treatment. Longer-term studies would be required to determine whether this effect continues or recurs. A number of genes which have been previously observed to be over-expressed in tumours (Mycs, Clu)[37], tumor suppressors (Patched, Ptch), or otherwise involved in metastasis or DNA repair: bikunin (Ambp)[38], ornithine decarboxylase gene (Odc), Trefoil factor 1 (Tff1)[39], insulin like growth factor (Igf2) [40] and DNA repair protein 1 (Ddb1), were also differentially expressed in NS398 treated infected mice (Figure (Figure3).3 Helicobacter infection is strongly associated with the induction of a strong Th1-type inflammatory response, with high levels of Ifnγ, which induces expression of other inflammatory mediators such as iNOS and Cox-2, and also circulating growth factors such as gastrin [45]. Supporting the notion that Ifnγ plays the key role in attracting and activating lymphocytes [46,47], we observed that expression of T-cell surface markers Icam1 [48,49] and Cd86 and ligands (Sell) [50] peaked at week 13 in infected mice. The interferon dependent GTPases (Igtp, Iigp-pending) regulate the anti-microbial activities of Ifnγ in a STAT1 dependent manner [51,52], and their expression was dramatically reduced in NS398 treated mice by the end of the study. Overall, inhibition of Cox-2 activity led to a reduced expression of inflammatory mediators between weeks 13 and 19 (Figure (Figure3);3 Infection with H. pylori has been reported to damage epithelial integrity and several potential mechanisms for this have been reported (reviewed in [54]). CagA, a major H. pylori pathogenicity factor, is translocated into epithelial cells via the type IV secretion apparatus [55,56]. Studies in a canine kidney cell model (MDCK) showed that CagA associates with the tight junction adaptor protein zona occludens 1 (zo-1, mouse homologue -tight junction protein 1, Tjp1) and the junctional adhesion molecule (Jcam or Jam), leading to a long term disruption of epithelial barrier function in vitro [57]. Whilst we observed increased expression of Tjp1 at the transcriptional level in NS398 treated infected mice, Jcam expression was not affected. In addition, an EST with homology to connexin 45 (AV148957, Gja7) and Aqp5 were influenced by H. pylori infection regardless of NS398 treatment (Figure (Figure3).3 A number of published reports have attempted to shed light on gene regulation in H. pylori infection using the microarray approach to study global gene expression in gastric epithelial cells in vitro [61-63] (reviewed in [64]), reporting a rapid up-regulation of inflammatory mediators and a variety of transcription factors to be the hallmarks of the expression pattern. In our study, none of the proliferation related genes (c-Fos, b-Fos, c-Jun and cyclinD1 (Pcna)) reported by Sepulveda et al., nor those reported by Cox et al. (amphiregulin, Adam10) [61] were differentially expressed in any group of mice. This probably reflects the differences between the in vitro and in vivo models of infection. The data reported here, and that of other reports [25,65] strongly suggest that cells of the immune system influence not only this effect but also epithelial integrity, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from in vitro studies using cell lines in isolation. Conclusion Some of the Cox-2 dependent genes from this study have been previously identified as being influenced by Cox-2 or Cox-2 inhibition (Gast, Icam1, Odc), but the remainder are novel and point to new links between Cox-2 and inflammatory processes, epithelial repair and integrity. This study has provided insights into not only the effects of prostaglandin inhibitors on inflammation, but also enabled us to identify novel Cox-2 dependent processes such as a role in epithelial integrity and as a result further targets for its role in transformation. Further investigation of these targets will help us to explain the protective effects of Cox-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs in gastritis patients and aid the development of new treatment strategies. Methods H. pylori strains H. pylori strain P12, ΔPAI and ΔVacA were cultured on GC Agar plates as previously described [66,67]. The mouse adapted H. pylori strain (SSI) (kind gift from A. Lee, University of Sydney, Australia) were cultured on GC Agar plates as previously described [68]. For infection, bacteria were scraped off plates and grown overnight in liquid culture in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth [68]. Detection of prostaglandin E2 in stomach after daily administration of NS398 After infection with a single oral dose of 1 × 109 of a mouse adapted strain of H. pylori (SS1) suspended in sterile PBS, female C57 BL/6 mice (n = 18) then received daily subcutaneous injections of either vehicle (1% Tween 80) or 10 mg/kg of NS398 (Merck) in 1% Tween 80 for 14 days. On day 14, mice were euthanized and the stomach was removed, opened, washed in ice cold PBS, and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The gastric mucosa was scraped off and pulverized in liquid nitrogen. The material was weighed, suspended in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, vortexed for 1 min, and then clarified by centrifugation at 10 000 g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was purified using a Prostaglandin E2 Affinity Column (Cayman) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The amount of prostaglandin E2 was determined by enzyme immunoassay (PGE2 EIA kit; Cayman). Effect of administration of NS398 on inflammation in chronic H. pylori infection For the long-term gene expression study, 48 female C57 BL/6 mice were infected with two oral doses (one week apart) of 1 × 109 H. pylori (SS1) and 100 μl 0.1 M bicarbonate. Control (non-infected) mice received bicarbonate alone. Groups of infected and non-infected mice received daily subcutaneous doses (100 μl) of 10 mg/kg NS398 dissolved in PBS, 1% Tween 80 for 6, 13 or 19 weeks. Control groups of mice received vehicle alone (PBS, 1% Tween 80) (Table 3).
Preparation of stomach tissue Mice were killed and the stomach was removed and cut along the greater curvature into two tissue fragments encompassing antral and oxyntic mucosa, as well as part of the non-secretory epithelium. The stomach was cut longitudinally into 3 parts. One third of the tissue was frozen immediately in liquid N2. One third was weighed, homogenized and then serially diluted and plated out on Blood Agar plates (blood agar base No.2, 10% defibrinated horse blood, Vancomycin, Amphotericin B, Polymyxin B, Bacitracin, Nalidixic acid) to determine the number of colony forming units (cfu) of H. pylori. The remaining 1/3 of tissue was fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde and processed for histological analysis. Tissue was embedded in paraffin and 2–4 μm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, plus Warthin Starry stain and assessed by 2 independent pathologists (M.S & M.V) blinded to the experimental design. Pathology and colonization were scored according to the modified Sydney System [69]. RNA isolation and quality control RNA was isolated from 1/3 the gastric mucosa by scraping tissue over liquid nitrogen as previously described [25]. RNA from 3 mice with similar colonization levels were selected and pooled for microarray analysis. In situ Oligonucleotide Arrays A custom oligonucleotide glass array of specific 60 mer oligonucleotides representing 8187 mouse genes was designed based on Unigene Clusters (Unigene build#148), and produced by Agilent Technologies (Palo Alto, USA)[25]. Oligonucleotide probes were synthesized and deposited by Agilent using in situ ink-jet printing technology as proposed by Blanchard et al. [70]. Labeling and hybridization to arrays RNA (5 μg) from each pool was amplified and labelled as described previously [25]. Pairs of target RNAs were mixed and hybridized to arrays to perform 3 experimental comparisons i.e. infected versus non infected, infected only versus NS398 treated and infected and non infected versus non infected and NS398 treated (Figure (Figure2A).2A Culture of gastric cell lines, and in vitro infection experiments MKN28 cells (ATCC, Rockville, USA) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco BRL, Eggenstein, Germany) medium containing 10% foetal calf serum (FCS, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Germany) using standard methods. H. pylori strains P12, P12-PAI and P12-VacA were added to epithelial cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100. Western blots were performed as described previously [22]. Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (Perkin Elmer, Jügesheim, Germany) and detected using specific antibodies (Cox-2, Cayman, MI, USA; Zo1; Odc and Aquaporin 5, Santa Cruz, CA, USA,). An HRP-labelled secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody was used (diluted 1:3000) and the Renaissance Western Blot system (ECL, Eschwege, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Real-Time PCR assay Total RNA was isolated from tissue as described above and subsequently used for cDNA synthesis. Real-Time quantitative RT-PCR analyses for Cox-2 sense 5'-AGA AGG AAA TGG CTG CAG AA-3, antisense 5'AGG TGC TCG GCT TCC AG TAT); Aqp5 sense 5'GGC CCT CTT AAT AGG CAA CC-3, antisense 5'TTG CCT GGT GTT GTG TTG TT-3; Gast sense 5' ACC AAT GAG GAC CTG GAA CA-3, antisense 5'CAT CCA TCC GTA TGC TTC CT-3; Tjp1 sense 5'-TCC ACC TCT GTC CAG CTC TT-3', antisense 5'-CAC CGG AGT GAT GGT TTT CT-3'; Icam1 sense, 5'-TTC ACA CTG AAT GCC AGC TC-3' antisense 5'-GCC ACA GTT CTC AAA GCA CA-3'; Odc sense 5'-TTG CCA CTG ATG ATT CCA AA-3', antisense 5'-AGC CAC CAC CAA TAT CAA GC-3' and TGFβ sense 5'-ACC TTC TGA TCC ATC GGT TG-3' TGFβ antisense 5'-TTC CTG TTG GCT GAG TTG TG-3' cDNA were performed using the ABM PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System instrument and software (PE Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA) and SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems) with thermocycler conditions recommended by the manufacturer. PCRs were performed in duplicate in a total volume of 30 μl containing 10 μM primers. Data were normalized to HPRT (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase) expression to perform relative quantifications (Primers: sense 5'-GTT GGA TAC AGG CCA GCA TTT GT-3', antisense 5'-CAC AGG ACT ACT AGA ACA CCT GC-3'). Relative gene expression was calculated using the method described by Pfaffl [71] and expressed as fold change. Competing interests AW has served as a consultant for Agilent Technologies (the MPI for Infection Biology was a reference laboratory for Agilent Technologies). The authors declare that they have no other competing interests. Authors' contributions MN and MH conceived the studies, oversaw the experimental work and helped draft the manuscript. AW, MW, CW and SJ performed the experimental work and participated in data analysis. AW analyzed the microarray data and wrote the manuscript. MS and MV performed the pathological scoring. BW and TFM contributed to the design of the studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Additional file 1 Tables S1, S2, S3 and S4. Table S1 – Fold Change in gene expression of all genes in infected mice (V+Hp) relative to non-infected, vehicle only treated mice (V) ie. A fold change of 3 means that the gene was 3 times more strongly expressed in infected mice (V+Hp). Table S2 – Fold Change in gene expression of all genes in infected, NS398 treated (NS398+Hp) relative to infected mice (V+Hp). Table S3 – Fold Change in gene expression of all genes in in non infected, NS398 (NS398) relative to non infected, vehicle only treated mice (V) mice. Table S4 – Confirmation of gene expression using Real time PCR. The expression level of selected genes was confirmed by performing semi quantitative real time PCR on cDNA from individual mice. Fold changes are the man fold change from n = 3 mice. In all but 4 instances, the microarray result was confirmed (cut off ± 3 fold change) and even in these cases, the gene expression had the same tendency (up or down regulated) (see italicised data points). Click here for file(2.7M, xls) Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Marina Drabkina, Jörg Angermann, Frauke Schreiber, Dagmar Frahm, Kirsten Hoffmann and Annette Dietrich for excellent technical assistance. We are indebted to Yevhen Vainshtein and Hans Mollenkopf for their contributions to the design of the mouse oligonucleotide array and Claudia Scheppers for maintenance of the Resolver database. The support and co-operation of Götz Frommer and Andreas Rhülman of Agilent Technologies, and proofreading of the manuscript by Lesley Ogilvie are also gratefully acknowledged. This work was funded by the Max-Planck Society Tandem Project 'Significance of Helicobacter pylori induced COX-2 gene expression'. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Dig Dis. 2001; 19(2):99-103.
[Dig Dis. 2001]Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Jan; 2(1):28-37.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Apr; 17(4):495-502.
[J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002]Dig Dis. 2001; 19(2):104-11.
[Dig Dis. 2001]Endocr Relat Cancer. 2001 Jun; 8(2):97-114.
[Endocr Relat Cancer. 2001]Annu Rev Biochem. 2000; 69():145-82.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 2000]J Clin Invest. 2001 Jun; 107(12):1491-5.
[J Clin Invest. 2001]Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Feb; 15(2):187-93.
[Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001]Gut. 2001 Sep; 49(3):443-53.
[Gut. 2001]Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Feb; 6(2):519-25.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2000]Cancer Lett. 2008 Nov 8; 270(2):218-28.
[Cancer Lett. 2008]Cancer. 2001 May 15; 91(10):1876-81.
[Cancer. 2001]Cell Microbiol. 2003 Nov; 5(11):821-34.
[Cell Microbiol. 2003]J Immunol. 2000 Jul 15; 165(2):1022-9.
[J Immunol. 2000]Pharmacology. 1997 Jul; 55(1):44-53.
[Pharmacology. 1997]J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Feb; 280(2):606-13.
[J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 14; 100(21):12289-94.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2001 Aug 24; 276(34):31720-31.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Cell Microbiol. 2003 Nov; 5(11):821-34.
[Cell Microbiol. 2003]J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Sep; 199(3):428-35.
[J Am Coll Surg. 2004]Br J Cancer. 2002 Aug 27; 87(5):574-9.
[Br J Cancer. 2002]Cancer Res. 2003 Mar 1; 63(5):942-50.
[Cancer Res. 2003]Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Oct; 48(10):2005-17.
[Dig Dis Sci. 2003]Mol Pathol. 2003 Feb; 56(1):19-24.
[Mol Pathol. 2003]Hum Cell. 2001 Sep; 14(3):233-6.
[Hum Cell. 2001]J Cell Biol. 2002 May 27; 157(5):761-70.
[J Cell Biol. 2002]Biochem J. 1986 Mar 1; 234(2):249-62.
[Biochem J. 1986]Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Jan; 48(1):36-46.
[Dig Dis Sci. 2003]Nature. 2004 Sep 30; 431(7008):527-32.
[Nature. 2004]Adv Immunol. 2007; 96():41-101.
[Adv Immunol. 2007]Gastroenterology. 1997 Jun; 112(6):1908-19.
[Gastroenterology. 1997]J Dent Res. 2000 Dec; 79(12):1955-61.
[J Dent Res. 2000]FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003 May 25; 36(3):127-34.
[FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003]Science. 2000 Feb 25; 287(5457):1497-500.
[Science. 2000]Cell Microbiol. 2000 Apr; 2(2):155-64.
[Cell Microbiol. 2000]Science. 2003 May 30; 300(5624):1430-4.
[Science. 2003]Cell Commun Adhes. 2001; 8(4-6):209-12.
[Cell Commun Adhes. 2001]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002 Jan 30; 1542(1-3):116-24.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002]Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Apr; 16 Suppl 2():145-57.
[Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Feb; 7(1):33-8.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004]Helicobacter. 2008 Apr; 13(2):94-102.
[Helicobacter. 2008]Mol Microbiol. 1996 Apr; 20(2):361-73.
[Mol Microbiol. 1996]Mol Microbiol. 1994 Apr; 12(2):307-19.
[Mol Microbiol. 1994]Infect Immun. 2001 Mar; 69(3):1714-21.
[Infect Immun. 2001]Am J Surg Pathol. 1996 Oct; 20(10):1161-81.
[Am J Surg Pathol. 1996]Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Dec; 14(13):1649.
[Nat Biotechnol. 1996]Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1; 29(9):e45.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2001]Cell Microbiol. 2003 Nov; 5(11):821-34.
[Cell Microbiol. 2003]Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Dec 1; 10(23):7950-7.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2004]