![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Plant Biology Impact of clock-associated Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators in metabolic coordination aRIKEN Plant Science Center, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan; bLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan; and cGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan 2To whom correspondence should be addressed at: RIKEN Plant Science Center, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan., E-mail: ksaito/at/faculty.chiba-u.jp Edited by Marc C. E. Van Montagu, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, and approved March 9, 2009 Author contributions: A.F., M. Kusano, and N.N. designed research; A.F., M. Kusano, N.N., M. Kobayashi, and N.H. performed research; A.F., M. Kusano, N.N., H.S., and T.M. analyzed data; A.F., M. Kusano, and K.S. wrote the paper. 1A.F., M. Kusano, and N.N. contributed equally to this work. Received January 28, 2009. Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. This article has been corrected. See Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26; 106(21): 8791. See commentary "Linkage between circadian clock and tricarboxylic acid cycle in Arabidopsis" in Plant Signal Behav, volume 4 on page 660.Abstract In higher plants, the circadian clock controls a wide range of cellular processes such as photosynthesis and stress responses. Understanding metabolic changes in arrhythmic plants and determining output-related function of clock genes would help in elucidating circadian-clock mechanisms underlying plant growth and development. In this work, we investigated physiological relevance of PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS (PRR 9, 7, and 5) in Arabidopsis thaliana by transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses. Metabolite profiling using gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry demonstrated well-differentiated metabolite phenotypes of seven mutants, including two arrhythmic plants with similar morphology, a PRR 9, 7, and 5 triple mutant and a CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1)-overexpressor line. Despite different light and time conditions, the triple mutant exhibited a dramatic increase in intermediates in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This suggests that proteins PRR 9, 7, and 5 are involved in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis. Integrated analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics revealed that PRR 9, 7, and 5 negatively regulate the biosynthetic pathways of chlorophyll, carotenoid and abscisic acid, and α-tocopherol, highlighting them as additional outputs of pseudo-response regulators. These findings indicated that mitochondrial functions are coupled with the circadian system in plants. Keywords: circadian, mitochondria, metabolomics, GC-MS, tricarboxylic acid cycle In higher plants, the endogenous circadian clock controls various cellular processes ranging from photosynthesis to stress responses (1–3). The clock provides plants with the ability to adapt to daily changes in environmental conditions, thereby temporally organizing their physiological and metabolic processes. Recent studies, using mainly Arabidopsis, have begun to shed light on the mechanism of circadian clock at a molecular level (4, 5). Three candidate genes, CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1), LHY (LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL), and TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1), are associated with the circadian oscillator. They form the first main part of the interlocked transcriptional/translational feedback loops in the model of circadian oscillation. Although this loop is essential for clock function, the CCA1/LHY-TOC1 feedback circuit alone is not sufficient to account for various aspects of circadian behaviors (6, 7). TOC1 is a member of the PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRR) family proteins, which include five elements (PRR9, PRR7, PRR5, PRR3, and TOC1/PRR1) (8, 9). PRR9 and PRR7 are reported to be crucial components of a temperature-sensitive circadian system (10), whereas triple-knockout plants of PRR9, 7, and 5 (d975) show arrhythmic expression of clock-associated genes under continuous light. Furthermore, PRR9/7/5 repress the accumulation of CCA1/LHY mRNA (9), whereas CCA1 and LHY activate transcription of PRR9 and PRR7 by binding with their promoter regions (11). d975 has a pleiotropic phenotype, including developmental abnormalities such as late flowering, long hypocotyls under constant red light, and dark green leaves (9, 12). These phenotypes are substantially similar to those of arrhythmic plants overexpressing the CCA1 gene (CCA1-ox) (13). Using transcriptome analysis, we clarified that d975 is tolerant to abiotic stresses, such as cold and drought, as a result of up-regulation of the dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 1 (DREB1) or C-repeat-binding factor (CBF) gene (14). Other reports on the relationship between circadian-clock regulation and abiotic stress responses (15, 16) suggest that clock genes have unknown output in addition to their clock-related output (17–19). Recent biochemical approaches demonstrated the importance of posttranscriptional and posttranslational control for the circadian mechanism (20–22). In the postgenomics era, metabolomics has been used not only to dissect plant metabolism per se, but also to identify unknown gene functions by comparing profiles of wild-type (WT) and genetically altered plants or during developmental changes (23) and diurnal changes (24). Therefore, characterizing an arrhythmic mutant from the viewpoint of metabolomic changes will help identify unknown output of clock genes. Such study in Arabidopsis may help us understand the evolutionary relationship between the clock function and metabolism across biological kingdoms and help in development of treatment methods for diseases caused by impaired biological clock and metabolic disorders. For example, recent investigations in mouse showed that clock genes are likely related to lifestyle diseases such as obesity and metabolic syndrome (25, 26). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1 (PGC-1), a key component in energy regulation in mammals, integrates the circadian clock with energy or lipid metabolism (27). This component enhances mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial remodeling (28), and although an involvement of mitochondria in circadian rhythmicity in mammals and fungi has been proposed (29, 30), the link between the clock function and mitochondria in plants remains unclear. In the present work, we investigated Arabidopsis thaliana with abnormal rhythmicity and performed transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses to gain insights into clock function and metabolism. Comparative metabolomics revealed unique elevated levels of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates in d975. Because the unique pattern remained unchanged under different light conditions, a robust link between circadian-clock function and metabolic homeostasis in the TCA cycle was suggested. Integrated analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics further revealed outputs of PRR 9/7/5 related to central metabolism, mainly in mitochondria. Results Comparative Genomics Suggests Structural and Functional Conservation of the Multigene Family of PRRs Among Plant Species. Genomic analysis has shown that PRR genes in Arabidopsis are encoded by a multigene family containing five members closely associated with the clock oscillator (8). The sequence analyses based on phylogenetic tree show high conservation of the PRR amino acid sequence (e.g., pseudo-receiver domain and CCT motif) among seven plant species [see also supporting information (SI) Methods]. By assessing syntenic relationships based on the Plant Genome Duplication Database (PGDD) (31), phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that PRR3 and PRR7 in Arabidopsis are paralogous genes (Fig. S1A, solid red arrow). Many cross-genome syntenic relationships among the seven plant species were also indicated (Fig. S1A, black arrows). Expression patterns using the DIURNAL database (see SI Methods) indicate similar diurnal rhythms in the transcript level of the PRRs among three plant species (A. thaliana, Oryza sativa, and Populus trichocarpa) (Fig. S1B), although the function of PRR9/7/5 is largely unknown in these species, except in A. thaliana and O. sativa (32). Thus, our comparative genomics study suggests structural and functional conservation of the multigene family of PRRs across a variety of plant species. Metabolite Phenotyping Differentiates d975 from CCA1-ox Exhibiting Similar Morphology. We confirmed that d975 and CCA1-ox were morphologically similar to each other under identical growth conditions (Fig. 1
d975 Exhibited the Most Pronounced Changes in Primary Metabolism Among the Examined Mutants. To characterize d975 further, we compared metabolite profiles among seven mutants: d975, CCA1-ox, mto1 (33), sng1 (34), tt4, tt5 (35), and double mutant serat2;1 serat2;2 (36). The mutants mto1, sng1, and serat2;1 serat2;2, possess mutations related to primary metabolism, whereas mutants tt4 and tt5 possess mutations related to flavonoid metabolism. Profile clustering, using MDS (multidimensional scaling), was based on 52 metabolites that were commonly detected in the seven mutants. A 2D MDS plot (Fig. 1 d975 Exhibits Considerably Increased TCA Cycle Intermediates, Whereas CCA1-ox Shows Less Change in Primary Metabolism. To differentiate metabolite profiles of the two arrhythmic plants, significant metabolite changes (FDR, q < 0.05) observed in d975 or CCA1-ox were compared against WT on a metabolic map (Fig. 2
In a higher-resolution time series experiment, we further investigated the metabolite profiles of d975 from Zeitgeber time (ZT) 7 to 19 (Fig. 2 Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Changes Reveal PRR9/7/5 Function in Regulation of Biosynthetic Pathways Associated with Chlorophyll, Carotenoid and Abscisic Acid (ABA), and α-Tocopherol. Using MapMan (37), an ontology tool, we examined the patterns of transcriptional change in genes involved in central metabolism (Fig. S4A). We observed the up-regulation of genes encoding synthetic enzymes of osmolytes such as proline, galactinol, and raffinose (e.g., AT2G39800, P5CS1) as reported (14). There were general trends for induction of expression of genes that are involved in starch synthesis and degradation, photorespiration, tetrapyrrole metabolism, and terpene biosynthesis. Particularly, to facilitate the integration of marked changes in gene expression and metabolite accumulation in d975, we focused on TCA cycle (Fig. S4B). The expressions of a gene encoding fumarase (AT2G47510) and putative 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (AT5G65750) in the TCA cycle were down-regulated in d975. These changes might suggest a reason for the overaccumulation of TCA cycle intermediates in the triple mutant (see Discussion). To detect the transcriptional coordination at the metabolic pathway level further, the number of genes with significant changes in expression in d975 at each time point was counted. Within each AraCyc (38) pathway, we compared the proportion of genes with significant changes in expressions (Dataset S4). Marked induction was observed in the metabolic pathways associated with (i) chlorophyll biosynthesis, (ii) carotenoid and ABA, and (iii) α-tocopherol (Fig. 3
Discussion A detailed metabolomic analysis using a triple mutant, d975, clearly demonstrated that PRR9/7/5 is involved in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Although it has been proposed that abnormalities in mitochondrial function probably affect clock functions in animals and fungi (29, 30), there were no reports indicating such a relationship in plants. Here, a robust link between the function of PRR9/7/5 and mitochondrial metabolism was detected by transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses. First, despite the morphological similarity between the two arrhythmic mutants (d975 and CCA1-ox), we were able to distinguish clearly their metabolite phenotypes under both LD and LL (Fig. 1 Overaccumulation of TCA cycle intermediates in d975 may be explained, at least partially, by the down-regulation of genes encoding fumarase (AT2G47510) and putative 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (AT5G65750), which are supposed to be localized in mitochondria (Fig. S4). Because of the reduction in expression of these genes, the levels of malate, fumarate, and amino acids, produced via 2-oxo-glutarate, increased in d975. This is in accordance with a report that showed elevated levels of malate, fumarate, and glycine in transgenic tomato with low fumarase activity (40). Sweetlove et al. (41) have proposed an interaction of ascorbate metabolism, respiration, and photosynthesis, and it is known that ascorbate levels in higher plant leaves show a diurnal rhythm (42). Both reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and ROS defense in plants are likely controlled, in part, by a functional circadian clock. Because the last enzyme in the ascorbate biosynthesis pathway, l-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase (GLDH), is known as an integral membrane protein in mitochondria (43), the clock function involved in cellular redox homeostasis and stress resistance may be closely related with the mitochondrial function. Here, we observed pathway-level changes in expression of genes encoding enzymes associated with the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathways (Fig. S4C Upper). However, no change in the expression level of PIF1 (39), one of the regulators of chlorophyll biosynthesis, was observed in d975. This implies that regulation of PRR9/7/5 for chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway is independent of PIF1-mediated regulation. It is possible that up-regulation of gene expressions in the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway resulted in the mature, dark green leaves of d975 (9). This hypothesis is further supported by the significant increase of phytol in d975, as phytol is generated during chlorophyll catabolism by chlorophyllase. As an output pathway regulated by PRR9/7/5, we also clarified the biosynthesis of carotenoid and ABA (Fig. 3 The significance of ascorbate and α-tocopherol as protectants against light-induced oxidative stress is well established (45, 46), and α-tocopherol content follows a diurnal rhythm in leaves (47). Significant increase of α-tocopherol level in d975, together with up-regulation of gene expressions of the α-tocopherol biosynthetic pathway (Fig. S4C Lower), suggests that PRR9/7/5 may play a role in regulating the α-tocopherol level in the diurnal cycle. As a conclusion, the function of PRR9/7/5, as elucidated so far, is summarized in Fig. 4
Methods Plant Materials and Growth Conditions. A. thaliana accession Columbia (Col-0) was used as a WT plant source. Triple-knockout Arabidopsis mutant prr9-10/prr7-11/prr5-11 has been described in ref. 9. Seedling were grown on Murashige and Skoog (392-00591;Wako) with 0.3% gellan gumand 2% sucrose at pH 5.7 under continuous light (LL) or 12-h light/12-h dark (LD) cycles at 22 °C for 18 days. Whole plants were sampled during days 18–19 to reduce possible developmental effects. Experimental Design. Two types of experiments were carried out. The lower temporal resolution experiment (Design 1) was designed for metabolite phenotyping of WT, d975, and CCA1-ox (Fig. S2A), over 24 sampling times (3 genotypes were harvested at 3-h intervals). To facilitate LD metabolite phenotyping, we represent three successive sampling times as points ZT 3, 6, and 9 for LD1 and ZT 15, 18, and 21 for LD2 (Fig. S2A Top). Similarly, under LL conditions, sampling times (ZT 4, 7, and 10) were designated as point LL1–1, (ZT 16, 19, and 22) as LL1–2 (Fig. S2A Middle), (ZT 26, 29, and 32) as LL2–1, and (ZT 38, 41, and 44) as LL2–2 (Fig. S2A Bottom). The second experiment (Design 2) was a higher-resolution time series intended to obtain insight into the functional role of PRR 9/7/5 from ZT 7 to ZT 19 with respect to WT and d975 (Fig. S2B). This includes transcript profiling investigated previously (14). The number of time points in transcript profiling was smaller (4 time points, ZT 8 to 14 with 2-h intervals) than that in metabolite profiling (7 time points, ZT 7 to 19 with 2-h intervals). Metabolite Profiling. Each sample was extracted, derivatized, and analyzed by using gas chromatography–time-of-flight (GC-TOF/MS) as described in ref. 48. See also SI Methods. Quantification of ABA. One hundred mg of 18-day-old plants grown under LD conditions were harvested and ABA contents were measured as reported (49). Three biological replicates were harvested for ABA measurement. Transcript Profiling. The data were obtained from a previous study with the permission of authors (14). All raw CEL files have been deposited in the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center microarray database (NASCArrays) under accession number NASCARRAYS-421. Raw CEL files were normalized by robust multiarray average (RMA) (50) with Bioconductor Simpleaffy package (51). See also SI Methods. Comparative Metabolome Analysis. Metabolite profiles of d975 and CCA1-ox in Design 1 (Fig. S2A) were compared with those of other metabolome datasets: d975 (9) and CCA1-ox (13); mto1 (methionine-over accumulation 1) (33), tt4 (transparent testa4) (35), and double mutant serat2;1 serat2;2 (36); tt5 (35) and sng1 (sinapoylglucose accumulator 1) (34). All mutants used are in the Col-0 background. To cancel out the effect of different mass spectrometric conditions (e.g., detector responses, detector sensitivity, and column performance) among datasets the log2 ratio of the samples to the control samples in each dataset was used. We used MDS with Euclidean distance as implemented in the statistical R package. Statistical Data Analysis. PLS-DA, which is a highly suited regression technique for the analysis of “omics” data that contain typically many more variables (e.g., metabolites) than observations (e.g., replicates), was calculated by using SIMCA-P 11.0 software (Umetrics AB) with log10 transformation and unit variance scaling. The PLS-DA models for Fig. 1 Supporting Information
Acknowledgments. We thank Thomas Moritz from Umeå Plant Science Centre (Umeå, Sweden) for excellent technical advice on GC-TOF/MS profiling, Pär Jonsson from Umeå University (Umeå, Sweden) for hyphenated data analysis (HDA) assistance, and Hans Stenlund from Umeå University for raw data analysis (RDA) assistance. We thank Elaine Tobin at University of California (Los Angeles, CA) for the CCA1-ox plants. We thank Masanori Arita and Henning Redestig from RIKEN Plant Science Center (Yokohama, Japan) for discussions. This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports, and Technology, Japan. Footnotes The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0900952106/DCSupplemental. References 1. Dodd AN, et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science. 2005;309:630–633. [PubMed] 2. McClung CR. Plant circadian rhythms. Plant Cell. 2006;18:792–803. [PubMed] 3. Wijnen H, Young MW. Interplay of circadian clocks and metabolic rhythms. Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:409–448. [PubMed] 4. Mas P. Circadian-clock function in Arabidopsis thaliana: Time beyond transcription. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:273–281. [PubMed] 5. Harmer SL. The circadian system in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009 in press. 6. Locke JC, et al. Experimental validation of a predicted feedback loop in the multi-oscillator clock of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:59. [PubMed] 7. Zeilinger MN, Farre EM, Taylor SR, Kay SA, Doyle FJ., 3rd A novel computational model of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis that incorporates PRR7 and PRR9. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:58. [PubMed] 8. Matsushika A, Makino S, Kojima M, Mizuno T. Circadian waves of expression of the APRR1/TOC1 family of pseudo-response regulators in Arabidopsis thaliana: Insight into the plant circadian clock. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:1002–1012. [PubMed] 9. Nakamichi N, Kita M, Ito S, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS, PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5, together play essential roles close to the circadian clock of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46:686–698. [PubMed] 10. Salome PA, McClung CR. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 7 and 9 are partially redundant genes essential for the temperature responsiveness of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2005;17:791–803. [PubMed] 11. Farre EM, Harmer SL, Harmon FG, Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA. Overlapping and distinct roles of PRR7 and PRR9 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Curr Biol. 2005;15:47–54. [PubMed] 12. Nakamichi N, et al. Arabidopsis clock-associated pseudo-response regulators PRR9, PRR7, and PRR5 coordinately and positively regulate flowering time through the canonical CONSTANS-dependent photoperiodic pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:822–832. [PubMed] 13. Wang ZY, Tobin EM. Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell. 1998;93:1207–1217. [PubMed] 14. Nakamichi N, et al. Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:447–462. [PubMed] 15. Kant P, et al. Functional-genomics-based identification of genes that regulate Arabidopsis responses to multiple abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31:697–714. [PubMed] 16. Bieniawska Z, et al. Disruption of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is responsible for extensive variation in the cold-responsive transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:263–279. [PubMed] 17. Lakin-Thomas PL. Circadian rhythms: New functions for old clock genes. Trends Genet. 2000;16:135–142. [PubMed] 18. Ni Z, et al. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature. 2009;457:327–331. [PubMed] 19. Gutierrez RA, et al. Systems approach identifies an organic nitrogen-responsive gene network that is regulated by the master clock control gene CCA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4939–4944. [PubMed] 20. Sugano S, Andronis C, Green RM, Wang ZY, Tobin EM. Protein kinase CK2 interacts with and phosphorylates the Arabidopsis circadian clock-associated 1 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:11020–11025. [PubMed] 21. Kiba T, Henriques R, Sakakibara H, Chua NH. Targeted degradation of PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 5 by an SCFZTL complex regulates clock function and photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2007;19:2516–2530. [PubMed] 22. Fujiwara S, et al. Post-translational regulation of the Arabidopsis circadian clock through selective proteolysis and phosphorylation of pseudo-response regulator proteins. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:23073–23083. [PubMed] 23. Oksman-Caldentey KM, Saito K. Integrating genomics and metabolomics for engineering plant metabolic pathways. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005;16:174–179. [PubMed] 24. Gibon Y, et al. Integration of metabolite with transcript and enzyme activity profiling during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis rosettes. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R76. [PubMed] 25. Shimba S, et al. Brain and muscle Arnt-like protein-1 (BMAL1), a component of the molecular clock, regulates adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:12071–12076. [PubMed] 26. Turek FW, et al. Obesity and metabolic syndrome in circadian clock mutant mice. Science. 2005;308:1043–1045. [PubMed] 27. Liu C, Li S, Liu T, Borjigin J, Lin JD. Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α integrates the mammalian clock and energy metabolism. Nature. 2007;447:477–481. [PubMed] 28. Lin JD. Minireview. The PGC-1 coactivator networks: Chromatin-remodeling and mitochondrial energy metabolism. Mol Endocrinol. 2009;23:2–10. [PubMed] 29. Brody S. Circadian rhythms in Neurospora crassa: The role of mitochondria. Chronobiol Int. 1992;9:222–230. [PubMed] 30. Langmesser S, Albrecht U. Life time circadian clocks, mitochondria and metabolism. Chronobiol Int. 2006;23:151–157. [PubMed] 31. Tang H, et al. Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science. 2008;320:486–488. [PubMed] 32. Murakami M, Ashikari M, Miura K, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. The evolutionarily conserved OsPRR quintet: Rice pseudo-response regulators implicated in circadian rhythm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:1229–1236. [PubMed] 33. Inaba K, et al. Isolation of an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant, mto1, that overaccumulates soluble methionine (temporal and spatial patterns of soluble methionine accumulation). Plant Physiol. 1994;104:881–887. [PubMed] 34. Lorenzen M, Racicot V, Strack D, Chapple C. Sinapic acid ester metabolism in wild type and a sinapoylglucose-accumulating mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:1625–1630. [PubMed] 35. Li J, Ou-Lee TM, Raba R, Amundson RG, Last RL. Arabidopsis flavonoid mutants are hypersensitive to UV-B irradiation. Plant Cell. 1993;5:171–179. [PubMed] 36. Watanabe M, et al. Comparative genomics and reverse genetics analysis reveal indispensable functions of the serine acetyltransferase gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20:2484–2496. [PubMed] 37. Thimm O, et al. MapMan: A user-driven tool to display genomics datasets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 2004;37:914–939. [PubMed] 38. Mueller LA, Zhang P, Rhee SY. AraCyc: A biochemical pathway database for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:453–460. [PubMed] 39. Huq E, et al. Phytochrome-interacting factor 1 is a critical bHLH regulator of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Science. 2004;305:1937–1941. [PubMed] 40. Nunes-Nesi A, et al. Deficiency of mitochondrial fumarase activity in tomato plants impairs photosynthesis via an effect on stomatal function. Plant J. 2007;50:1093–1106. [PubMed] 41. Sweetlove LJ, Fait A, Nunes-Nesi A, Williams T, Fernie AR. The mitochondrion: An integration point of cellular metabolism and signalling. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2007;26:17–43. 42. Dutilleul C, et al. Leaf mitochondria modulate whole-cell redox homeostasis, set antioxidant capacity, and determine stress resistance through altered signaling and diurnal regulation. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1212–1226. [PubMed] 43. Millar AH, et al. Control of ascorbate synthesis by respiration and its implications for stress responses. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:443–447. [PubMed] 44. Lee KH, et al. Activation of glucosidase via stress-induced polymerization rapidly increases active pools of abscisic acid. Cell. 2006;126:1109–1120. [PubMed] 45. Muller-Moule P, Havaux M, Niyogi KK. Zeaxanthin deficiency enhances the high light sensitivity of an ascorbate-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:748–760. [PubMed] 46. Kanwischer M, Porfirova S, Bergmuller E, Dormann P. Alterations in tocopherol cyclase activity in transgenic and mutant plants of Arabidopsis affect tocopherol content, tocopherol composition, and oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 2005;137:713–723. [PubMed] 47. Munne-Bosch S, Alegre L. The function of tocopherols and tocotrienols in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2002;21:31–57. 48. Kusano M, et al. Unbiased characterization of genotype-dependent metabolic regulations by metabolomic approach in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst Biol. 2007;1:53. [PubMed] 49. Naito T, et al. A link between cytokinin and ASL9 (ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 2 LIKE 9) that belongs to the AS2/LOB (LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES) family genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:1269–1278. [PubMed] 50. Irizarry RA, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249–264. [PubMed] 51. Wilson CL, Miller CJ. Simpleaffy: A bioconductor package for Affymetrix quality control and data analysis. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3683–3685. [PubMed] 52. de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1453–1454. [PubMed] 53. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:9440–9445. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Science. 2005 Jul 22; 309(5734):630-3.
[Science. 2005]Plant Cell. 2006 Apr; 18(4):792-803.
[Plant Cell. 2006]Annu Rev Genet. 2006; 40():409-48.
[Annu Rev Genet. 2006]Trends Cell Biol. 2008 Jun; 18(6):273-81.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2008]Mol Syst Biol. 2006; 2():59.
[Mol Syst Biol. 2006]Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Sep; 41(9):1002-12.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2000]Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 May; 46(5):686-98.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2005]Plant Cell. 2005 Mar; 17(3):791-803.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 11; 15(1):47-54.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Jun; 48(6):822-32.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 23; 102(34):12071-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Science. 2005 May 13; 308(5724):1043-5.
[Science. 2005]Nature. 2007 May 24; 447(7143):477-81.
[Nature. 2007]Mol Endocrinol. 2009 Jan; 23(1):2-10.
[Mol Endocrinol. 2009]Chronobiol Int. 1992 Jun; 9(3):222-30.
[Chronobiol Int. 1992]Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Sep; 41(9):1002-12.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2000]Science. 2008 Apr 25; 320(5875):486-8.
[Science. 2008]Plant Cell Physiol. 2003 Nov; 44(11):1229-36.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2003]Plant Physiol. 1994 Mar; 104(3):881-887.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]Plant Physiol. 1996 Dec; 112(4):1625-30.
[Plant Physiol. 1996]Plant Cell. 1993 Feb; 5(2):171-179.
[Plant Cell. 1993]Plant Cell. 2008 Sep; 20(9):2484-96.
[Plant Cell. 2008]Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Mar; 50(3):447-62.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2009]Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Jun; 31(6):697-714.
[Plant Cell Environ. 2008]Plant Physiol. 2008 May; 147(1):263-79.
[Plant Physiol. 2008]Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 May; 46(5):686-98.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2005]Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Mar; 50(3):447-62.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2009]Plant J. 2004 Mar; 37(6):914-39.
[Plant J. 2004]Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Mar; 50(3):447-62.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2009]Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun; 132(2):453-60.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Science. 2004 Sep 24; 305(5692):1937-41.
[Science. 2004]Chronobiol Int. 1992 Jun; 9(3):222-30.
[Chronobiol Int. 1992]Chronobiol Int. 2006; 23(1-2):151-7.
[Chronobiol Int. 2006]Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Mar; 50(3):447-62.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2009]Plant J. 2007 Jun; 50(6):1093-106.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant Cell. 2003 May; 15(5):1212-26.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2003 Oct; 133(2):443-7.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Science. 2004 Sep 24; 305(5692):1937-41.
[Science. 2004]Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 May; 46(5):686-98.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2005]Cell. 2006 Sep 22; 126(6):1109-20.
[Cell. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2003 Oct; 133(2):748-60.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb; 137(2):713-23.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Mar; 50(3):447-62.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2009]Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 May; 46(5):686-98.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2005]Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Jun; 48(6):822-32.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2007]Chronobiol Int. 1992 Jun; 9(3):222-30.
[Chronobiol Int. 1992]Chronobiol Int. 2006; 23(1-2):151-7.
[Chronobiol Int. 2006]Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 May; 46(5):686-98.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2005]Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Mar; 50(3):447-62.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2009]BMC Syst Biol. 2007 Nov 21; 1():53.
[BMC Syst Biol. 2007]Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007 May; 71(5):1269-78.
[Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007]Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Mar; 50(3):447-62.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2009]Biostatistics. 2003 Apr; 4(2):249-64.
[Biostatistics. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15; 21(18):3683-5.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 May; 46(5):686-98.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2005]Cell. 1998 Jun 26; 93(7):1207-17.
[Cell. 1998]Plant Physiol. 1994 Mar; 104(3):881-887.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]Plant Cell. 1993 Feb; 5(2):171-179.
[Plant Cell. 1993]Plant Cell. 2008 Sep; 20(9):2484-96.
[Plant Cell. 2008]Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun; 132(2):453-60.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 12; 20(9):1453-4.
[Bioinformatics. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5; 100(16):9440-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]