![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009, European Molecular Biology Organization Termination of NF-κB activity through a gammaherpesvirus protein that assembles an EC5S ubiquitin-ligase 1Instituto de Microbiologia e Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal 2Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal 3Division of Neurobiology, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA aInstituto de Microbiologia e Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal. Tel.: +351 217 999 458; Fax: +351 217 999 459; E-mail: psimas/at/fm.ul.pt Received September 16, 2008; Accepted March 3, 2009. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This license does not permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without specific permission. Abstract Host colonisation by lymphotropic gammaherpesviruses depends critically on the expansion of viral genomes in germinal centre (GC) B cells. Yet, host and virus molecular mechanisms involved in driving such proliferation remain largely unknown. Here, we show that the ORF73 protein encoded by the murid herpesvirus-4 (MuHV-4) inhibits host nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) transcriptional activity through poly-ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal-dependent nuclear degradation of the NF-κB family member p65/RelA. The mechanism involves the assembly of an ElonginC/Cullin5/SOCS (suppressors of cytokine signalling)-like complex, mediated by an unconventional viral SOCS-box motif present in ORF73. Functional deletion of this SOCS-box motif ablated NF-κB inhibitory effect of ORF73, suppressed MuHV-4 expansion in GC B cells and prevented MuHV-4 persistent infection in mice. These findings demonstrate that viral inhibition of NF-κB activity in latently infected GC centroblasts is critical for the establishment of a gammaherpesvirus persistent infection, underscoring the physiological importance of proteasomal degradation of RelA/NF-κB as a regulatory mechanism of this signalling pathway. Keywords: ECS ubiquitin-ligase, gammaherpesvirus, germinal centre latency, NF-κB, SOCS Introduction Being obligatory intracellular parasites, viruses have evolved a variety of mechanisms to modulate specific host signal-transduction pathways to favour their own replication. One of such mechanisms targets nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), a family of ubiquitously expressed transcription factors that bind specific DNA sequences, κB sites, in the promoter region of a variety of genes, to modulate their rate of transcription/expression. In mammalian cells, the NF-κB family comprises five members—p65/RelA, RelB, c-Rel, p105/p50 and p100/p52 (Blank et al, 1992)—that can form homo- or heterodimers (Saccani et al, 2003). Under homoeostasis, NF-κB dimers are sequestered in the cytoplasm by the inhibitory IκB proteins, which include IκBα, IκBβ and IκB . These mask the nuclear localisation signal of the NF-κB dimers, impairing their nuclear translocation. Once exposed to pro-inflammatory stimuli, mammalian cells activate an IκB kinase (IKK) complex that phosphorylates IκB molecules leading to their poly-ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. This, in turn, promotes nuclear translocation of NF-κB dimers, where they bind to euchromatised κB sites to activate target gene transcription (Karin and Ben-Neriah, 2000).Genes regulated through NF-κB are involved in critical biological functions, including inflammation and apoptosis as well as cell proliferation. One essential aspect of the NF-κB signal-transduction pathway is that it must be tightly regulated to afford a fast response to a given stimulus, terminating this response as soon as the stimulus is no longer present. Although mechanisms regulating NF-κB activation have been studied extensively, those regulating its termination are less well perceived. Termination of NF-κB activity was initially thought to rely exclusively on the de novo expression of IκB molecules. Once resynthesised, IκBα enters the nucleus where it dissociates NF-κB dimers from κB sites, shuttling NF-κB dimers back to the cytoplasm (Arenzana-Seisdedos et al, 1997). However, in recent years, it has become apparent that many other mechanisms control the extent of NF-κB activation, including direct poly-ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of promoter-bound RelA (Saccani et al, 2004). This mechanism is regulated through the activation of multimeric E3 ubiquitin-ligases, which accept ubiquitin from E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, and transfer it to specific substrates promoting their degradation by the proteasome (Weissman, 2001). Two cellular proteins, PDLIM2 (Tanaka et al, 2007) and SOCS1 (suppressors of cytokine signalling 1; Ryo et al, 2003), have been identified as mediators of RelA poly-ubiquitination. In the case of SOCS1, this protein functions as the substrate recognition component of an ECS (ElonginC–Cullin2/5–SOCS) E3 ubiquitin-ligase (Ryo et al, 2003). SOCS proteins comprise several family members each of which share a C-terminal 40-amino-acid module that is known as the SOCS-box, which mediates the interaction with ElonginB/C and Cullin2/5 modules, bridging the substrate of ubiquitination to the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (Yoshimura et al, 2007). By virtue of assembling an ECSSOCS1 ligase and interacting with NF-κB subunits, SOCS1 directs ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of promoter-bound NF-κB members and efficient termination of transcriptional responses (Ryo et al, 2003; Saccani et al, 2004). Viruses have evolved several mechanisms to modulate NF-κB activity (Hiscott et al, 2006). One example is the NS5B protein of hepatitis C virus that targets the IKK complex resulting in IKK inhibition and suppression of NF-κB activity (Choi et al, 2006). Another strategy relies on the expression of viral IκB-like proteins that stably interact with NF-κB dimers, but lack the consensus serine residues phosphorylated by IKK. Thus, these viral inhibitors are not degraded in response to IKK activation, which prevents NF-κB translocation to the nucleus and the subsequent NF-κB-driven gene transcription. This is the case for the A238L IκB-like protein of African swine fever virus (Powell et al, 1996; Revilla et al, 1998; Tait et al, 2000). In addition, host NF-κB dimers can be targeted directly for degradation by viral proteins, as exemplified by the 3C-encoded protease of poliovirus that cleaves the transactivation domain (TAD) of RelA to inhibit NF-κB signalling (Neznanov et al, 2005). In this study, we describe a novel viral mechanism to suppress NF-κB activity. We provide conclusive evidence that the latency-associated protein ORF73 encoded by murid herpesvirus-4 (MuHV-4), a gammaherpesvirus genetically related to the human pathogens Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) (Simas and Efstathiou, 1998), targets nuclear RelA for proteasomal degradation. Gammaherpesviruses are among the most prevalent of human pathogens owing to their ability to cause persistent infections (Rickinson and Kieff, 2001). Persistent infection is associated with both lymphoid and epithelial tumours, which occur with increased incidence following immune suppression (Damania, 2004; Sunil-Chandra et al, 1994). Thus, the control of gammaherpesvirus infections represents a major clinical goal. A critical determinant of persistence is the ability to establish latency in memory B cells. Access to this cell type is gained by virus-driven lymphoproliferation of germinal centre (GC) B cells (Thorley-Lawson, 2001). During expansion of latency in B cells, viral genomes replicate in step with normal cell division. This process is mediated by viral episome maintenance proteins, which include Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1) of EBV (Yates et al, 1985) and ORF73 of gamma-2-herpesviruses (Ballestas et al, 1999; Hall et al, 2000). ORF73 proteins have also been shown to function as nuclear regulators of transcription and to interact with several cellular proteins to modulate host functions, postulated to be involved in latency regulation (Verma et al, 2007). The new mechanism here described underlying ORF73-mediated RelA degradation, involves the assembly of an EC5S complex mediated by an unconventional SOCS-box-like motif present in ORF73. We found that EC5SORF73 mimics the host ECSSOCS1 ubiquitin-ligase inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-induced NF-κB activation. Infection with recombinant viruses, bearing disruptive mutations in the ORF73 SOCS-box-like motif, rendered these viruses incapable of inducing lymphoproliferation in GC B cells and prevented persistent infection in mice. This finding emphasises the physiological importance of proteasomal degradation of NF-κB as a prompt terminator of this signalling pathway. Results Identification of ORF73 as an inhibitor of NF-κB transcriptional activity Experiments were designed to investigate whether NF-κB transcriptional activity was modulated in mammalian cells transiently expressing ORF73. Human HEK 293T cells were transiently co-transfected with a synthetic NF-κB reporter containing three copies of κB consensus sequences driving the expression of firefly luciferase (Winkler et al, 1996), with or without ORF73. TNF was used as a prototypical stimulus leading to NF-κB activation. Control cells, which did not express ORF73, responded in a dose-dependent manner to TNF; that is, the higher the TNF concentration the higher the luciferase activity (Figure 1A
We next assessed whether ORF73 would be modulating the NF-κB inhibitor IκBα by interfering with its degradation and/or resynthesis kinetics. Control transfected or ORF73-expressing cells, exposed to TNF, were monitored by western blot for the expression of IκBα. The pattern of IκBα degradation was similar in control versus ORF73-expressing cells (Figure 1B ORF73 directly targets the Rel homology domain of RelA Next, we hypothesised that ORF73 was directly targeting one or more members of the NF-κB family. We performed reporter gene assays where the primary NF-κB family member, RelA, was transiently overexpressed in different combinations with p50 and c-Rel, in the presence or absence of ORF73. Overexpression of these NF-κB family members over-rides the sequestering effect of endogenous IκB molecules (Anrather et al, 1999), as revealed by a significant fold induction of NF-κB transcriptional activity (Figure 1C The Rel homology domain (RHD) is a consensus sequence shared by all NF-κB proteins: RelA, RelB, c-Rel, p105/p50 and p100/p52. RelA, RelB and c-Rel contain an additional TAD responsible for interaction with the basal transcriptional machinery (Chen and Greene, 2004). To investigate which functional RelA domain was targeted by ORF73, we used two artificial fusion proteins depicted in Figure 1D RelA nuclear levels are diminished in ORF73-expressing cells We proceeded to investigate whether ORF73 would be functioning at the nuclear level by impairing the binding of NF-κB to DNA κB sites. We performed electromobility shift assays (EMSA) in the presence of oligonucleotides bearing the consensus κB site from the immunoglobulin promoter region. Cells were transiently transfected with ORF73, or control transfected, and NF-κB activation was induced by TNF. As illustrated in Figure 2A
When transiently expressed in resting HEK 293T cells, ORF73 localised primarily to the nucleus, as assessed by immunofluorescence (Figure 2C ORF73 triggers poly-ubiquitination and degradation of nuclear RelA As RelA nuclear degradation through poly-ubiquitination is one of the mechanisms through which NF-κB activity can be downmodulated (Saccani et al, 2004), we investigated whether ORF73 was targeting nuclear RelA for poly-ubiquitination/degradation. By performing a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) pull-down, in the presence of histidine-tagged ubiquitin, we observed that ORF73 expression significantly enhanced RelA poly-ubiquitination similarly to SOCS1 overexpression (Figure 3A
ORF73 immunoprecipitates exhibit E3 ubiquitin-ligase activity As ORF73 does not possess known catalytic domains that could justify poly-ubiquitination activity, we investigated whether ORF73 could be part of a cellular E3 ubiquitin-ligase. To that end, ORF73 was immunoprecipitated from control transfected, or ORF73-expressing cells, and the respective immunoprecipitates were subjected to an in vitro ubiquitination reaction in the presence of exogenous ubiquitin-activating (E1) and conjugating enzyme (E2) UbcH5a, together with GST–RelA as a substrate. The presence of ligase activity directed towards RelA was analysed by immunoblot with an anti-GST serum. As shown in Figure 3D ORF73 interacts with ElonginC and Cullin5 reconstituting an E3 ubiquitin-ligase Recently, LANA encoded by ORF73 from KSHV was also shown to possess E3 ubiquitin-ligase activity, acting as a SOCS protein responsible for substrate recognition and specificity (Cai et al, 2006). As E3 ubiquitin-ligases must interact physically with their targets to exert their function, we investigated whether ORF73 was associated with RelA in vivo. In cells overexpressing RelA and co-expressing ORF73, the latter protein was able to efficiently co-immunoprecipitate RelA (Figure 4A
We proceeded to test whether ORF73 could associate with other cellular components known to interact with SOCS-box-containing proteins, namely ElonginC and Cullin5. Transiently expressed ORF73 was able to co-immunoprecipitate with endogenous levels of ElonginC and Cullin5 (Figure 4B To confirm that inhibition of NF-κB by ORF73 was dependent on ElonginC and Cullin5, we tested whether ORF73 would inhibit NF-κB activity in cells in which the expression of those E3 ubiquitin-ligase components was suppressed using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Specific targeting of ElonginC and Cullin5 by siRNA was confirmed by a decrease in the expression levels of these two proteins (Figure 4C Mutation of the SOCS-box-like motif in ORF73 abrogates its inhibitory effect on NF-κB transcriptional activity SOCS-box-containing proteins interact with ElonginB/C and Cullin5/Rbx2 modules through specific degenerated amino-acid sequences referred as BC and Cul boxes, respectively (Kamura et al, 2004). Analysis of MuHV-4 ORF73 primary structure and by comparison with the previously identified BC and Cul5 boxes from LANA of KSHV (Cai et al, 2006), ORF73 appears to lack an obvious BC box. However, close to the C-terminal end, ORF73 presents a sequence homologous to LANA Cul5 box: VSCLPLVPGTTQQCVTY (Figure 5A
Further experiments showed that the ORF73–SOCS mutant was unable to potentiate RelA poly-ubiquitination (Figure 6A
Taken together, the data obtained with the ORF73–SOCS mutant corroborate that ORF73 functions as a SOCS-box-containing protein to assemble an EC5SORF73 E3 ubiquitin-ligase that recognises RelA and promotes its poly-ubiquitination. This leads to the subsequent proteasomal-dependent degradation of RelA, resulting in a strong termination of RelA/NF-κB activity. Inhibition of NF-κB signalling is essential for MuHV-4 latency To directly investigate the biological relevance of inhibition of NF-κB signalling in gammaherpesvirus pathogenesis, we generated a recombinant MuHV-4 in which the ORF73 gene was modified to recapitulate the amino-acid substitutions of the ORF73 SOCS-box mutant, designated vSOCS. To assure that any phenotypic alteration in vSOCS was due to the engineered mutations in the SOCS-box and not from any spurious mutation introduced during mutagenesis, a second independent recombinant virus was engineered (vSOCSi). To characterise the role of the introduced mutations in a natural context of infection, we started to compare the kinetics of viral replication in vitro and during the acute phase of infection in lungs of Balb/c mice following intranasal inoculation. For comparative purposes, the viruses analysed included the vSOCS mutants alongside wild-type MuHV-4 (vWT) and a previously described (Fowler et al, 2003) ORF73 frameshift mutant (v73FS) that encodes only the 163 amino acids of the N-terminus of the protein. All these viruses were analysed for genome integrity (Supplementary Figure S1) and showed identical in vitro growth (Supplementary Figure S2), as well as normal replication in acutely infected lungs (Figure 7A
Discussion In this study, we provide compelling evidence that the ORF73 protein from the lymphotropic gammaherpesvirus MuHV-4 is a strong terminator of NF-κB-dependent transcription. Several viral proteins have been shown to interfere with the NF-κB pathway (Hiscott et al, 2006). Here, we report the first example of a viral protein modulating NF-κB signalling/activity in the nucleus by mimicking a physiological regulatory pathway of NF-κB response termination. We show that the mechanism involves the assembly by ORF73 of an EC5S E3 ubiquitin-ligase. This complex targets nuclear-activated RelA for poly-ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation. The recruitment of ElonginB/C and Cullin5 is directed through an unconventional SOCS-box present in ORF73, whereas RelA recognition is mediated through an independent, as yet, unidentified structural motif. Thus, MuHV-4 has evolved to encode a protein that, in a manner equivalent to cellular SOCS1 (Ryo et al, 2003), efficiently terminates the NF-κB response. Taking into account that herpesviruses have co-evolved with their hosts, this finding emphasises the physiological relevance of the recently described regulation of the NF-κB pathway through poly-ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of promoter-bound RelA. This regulatory mechanism has been proposed to function in synergy with resynthesised IκBα to efficiently terminate NF-κB responses (Saccani et al, 2004). The advantage to the virus is obvious. Independently of the nature of the stimulus, MuHV-4 directly targets activated NF-κB dimers bound to κB sites efficiently shutting down transcription of specific genes. This specificity is unique to MuHV-4 and contrasts with other viral mechanisms of NF-κB inhibition that modulate upstream signalling events, such as the IKK complex, thus affecting collateral cellular signalling pathways. However, this property of a viral protein assembling an EC5S E3 ubiquitin-ligase is not exclusive to ORF73 of MuHV-4. The Vif protein encoded by human immunodeficiency virus-1 (Mehle et al, 2004), the E4ORF6 from adenovirus (Querido et al, 2001) and the ORF73 homologue LANA from KSHV (Cai et al, 2006), have recently been shown to assemble EC5S E3 ubiquitin-ligase complexes through unconventional SOCS-box motifs. In the case of LANA, poly-ubiquitination is directed towards the cellular proteins p53 and VHL. The authors suggested that manipulation of these tumour suppressors by LANA could potentially create a propitious environment for the maintenance of latent infection and progression of KSHV-associated tumours. Owing to the absence of an amenable animal model of infection, the direct in vivo role of this LANA function was not possible to assess. Unlike KSHV, the biological significance of the inhibition of NF-κB signalling by ORF73 of MuHV-4 for the pathogenesis of gammaherpesvirus infections can be directly addressed due to the availability of a murine animal model of infection (Simas and Efstathiou, 1998). Here, we show that a MuHV-4 recombinant virus with a disrupted SOCS-box motif abrogated the ability of the virus to expand in GC B cells and persist in the host. Although we cannot formally exclude that mutating four amino-acid residues in the SOCS-box motif in ORF73 of MuHV-4 is compromising its putative role as a viral episome maintenance protein, the findings presented here sustain the interpretation that inhibition of NF-κB activation is critical for amplification of latent virus in GC B cells and for persistence in the host. Notably, it has been recently shown that blocking the inhibition of NK-κB signalling mediated by EBV in latently infected cell lines results in the loss of virus genome copy number (Lu et al, 2008), providing evidence of a link between viral genome maintenance and NK-κB inhibition. Initiation of a GC reaction is reliant not only on specific antigen stimulation through the immunoglobulin B-cell receptor but also on the interaction between the TNFR family member CD40, expressed in B cells, and its ligand CD154, expressed by helper T cells. This molecular event triggers the activation of NF-κB transcription factors, the main downstream effectors of CD40 signalling. However, in the GC the gene expression profile of B cells changes markedly. In clear contrast with what is observed in naïve B cells, GC B cells fail to express most CD40 and NF-κB target genes (Basso et al, 2004; Klein and Dalla-Favera, 2008; Shaffer et al, 2001). Moreover, in GC B cells, the proteins c-Rel and RelA are localised in the cytoplasm, an indication of NF-κB inactivity and absence of CD40 signalling (Basso et al, 2004). It is noted that within the light zone of GCs and in memory B cells NF-κB members are again localised in the nucleus (Basso et al, 2004), which is indicative that activation of these transcriptional factors is needed for exiting from the proliferative GC stage promoting further B-cell differentiation. Taken together, these data suggest that during B-cell responses, NF-κB signalling needs to be transiently switched off during GC proliferation. Putting our present data into this context, we propose that inhibition of NF-κB by ORF73 is essential to promote the proliferation of latently infected B cells within GCs. According to our premise, ORF73 function relies on prior NF-κB activation and translocation of transcriptionally active dimers to the nucleus, which is critical for B-cell activation and initiation of GCs. This interpretation concurs with a previous study showing that constitutive inhibition of NF-κB from the initial stages of MuHV-4 infection impairs the establishment of latency (Krug et al, 2007). Hence, MuHV-4 modulation of NF-κB signalling must be tightly regulated to support GC formation, which needs transcriptionally active NF-κB, whereas progression into, and maintenance of a proliferative GC reaction requires the prompt termination of the NF-κB response. Thus, while ORF73 promotes the proliferation of MuHV-4-infected cells preventing premature differentiation, another yet unidentified signal must exist, viral or foreign, supporting further differentiation of latently infected centroblasts into long-lived memory B cells. Such timely regulation is consistent with the pattern of ORF73 transcription that we have shown before to be restricted to GC B cells but not to newly formed or follicular B cells (Marques et al, 2003). Effective colonisation of the host by gammaherpesviruses requires the proliferation of latently infected B cells (Stevenson, 2004). Herein, we provide evidence for a novel ORF73 function, as a mediator of NF-κB activity termination through the assembly of an Elongin/Cullin/SOCSORF73 ubiquitin-ligase that targets the NF-κB subunit RelA. By mimicking GC physiological inhibition of NF-κB, ORF73 promotes the development of MuHV-4-driven GC-like reactions to expand the host pool of latently infected cells. Given the intimate association of lymphoproliferative disease with gammaherpesvirus persistent infection, this study reinforces NF-κB as a putative target for therapeutic intervention in such virus-driven malignancies. Materials and methods Plasmids ORF73 expression plasmid was amplified by PCR from MuHV-4 genome, and the respective PCR product was cloned into pCMV-Myc (Clontech). pCMV-Myc encoding ORF73–SOCS was generated by site-directed mutagenesis using QuickChange kit (Stratagene). Myc-tagged versions of RelA, p50 and c-Rel; RelA chimaeras; and pC45 (κB-luc) or pBI-5 (TetO-luc) were described earlier (Winkler et al, 1996; Anrather et al, 1999). Histidine-tagged ubiquitin plasmid was kindly offered by Dr D Bohmann. Flag-tagged ElonginC and SOCS1 expression plasmids were provided by Dr E Burstein. Dr X-F Yu provided the Myc-tagged version of Cullin5. Immunological reagents ORF73 antiserum was generated by immunisation of New Zealand white rabbits (Abcam) with purified GST–ORF73 protein. Anti-RelA, anti-IκBα, anti-Cul5, anti-EloC, anti-ubiquitin and anti-LaminB antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies directed to c-Myc and Flag epitopes were from Clontech and Sigma, respectively. Actin was detected with a rabbit anti-actin polyclonal antibody (Sigma). Anti-GST and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Amersham Biosciences. Fluorochrome-labelled secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch. Tissue culture, DNA/siRNA transfection HEK 293T and NIH-3T3-CRE cells were cultured in DMEM plus 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, and 100 U/ml of penicillin–streptomycin. BHK-21 cells were cultured in GMEM supplemented as above plus 10% tryptose phosphate broth. Plasmid DNA and siRNAs were delivered to HEK 293T cells using Fugene 6 (Roche). The nucleofection system (Amaxa) was used to maximise transfection efficiencies for experiments presented in Figures 1B Reporter gene assays For reported gene assays, HEK 293T cells were transiently transfected with 300 ng of reporter vectors, 900 ng of each NF-κB member and 900 ng of ORF73/ORF73–SOCS expression plasmids. In all transfections, a β-galactosidase expression plasmid (300 ng) was used to normalise luciferase values. After 48 h in culture, cells were left unstimulated or stimulated with appropriate TNF concentrations for 7 h. Cells were washed in PBS and lysed in 120 μl of reporter assay lysis buffer (Promega). Luciferase and β-galactosidase activities were assayed using Luciferin (Promega) and Galacton (Tropix), respectively. Light emission in each sample was quantified in a luminometer. Results are shown as the fold induction relative to luciferase activity measured in unstimulated or control transfected cells. EMSAs EMSAs were performed using the Lightshift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Pierce) for the NF-κB consensus oligonucleotide probe (5′-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3′, from the immunoglobulin promoter) 5′ end-labelled with biotin (Thermo Scientific Biopolymers). Binding reactions were made in a total volume of 20 μl by adding 5 μg of nuclear extracts to 20 fmol of probe in binding buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0); 50 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 5% glycerol; 0.05 μg/μl poly [dI–dC] and 0.5 mM DTT). After incubation at room temperature (r.t.) for 30 min, the electromobility of the probe was analysed in 6% native PAGE. For the supershift assays, antibodies recognising RelA, ORF73 or Actin were added to nuclear extracts at a final concentration of 0.05 μg/ml, and incubated at r.t. for 1 h, prior to the addition of the probe 5′ end-labelled with [γ32P]ATP (Amersham Life Science). Immunofluorescence analysis HEK 293T cells grown on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips were transiently transfected with 1 μg of ORF73-expressing plasmid. After 24 h, cells were incubated with medium alone or stimulated with TNF (50 ng/ml) for 15 min. Cells were incubated in fixing solution (5% formaldehyde and 2% sucrose in PBS) for 15 min, and permeabilised (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 5 min. Immunostaining was performed with the appropriate antibodies diluted in PBS. Following staining, coverslips were washed and mounted onto microscope slides with Mowiol. Immunoprecipitations Transiently transfected HEK 293T cells with expression plasmids encoding RelA (3 μg), Cullin5 (4 μg), ElonginC (2 μg) and/or ORF73 (3 μg) were disrupted in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM NaF, 100 μM Na3VO4 and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Complete; Roche). Cleared supernatants were processed for immunoprecipitation essentially as described (Pires de Miranda et al, 2008). RelA ubiquitination in vivo For analysis of endogenous RelA ubiquitination, total cellular lysates, prepared with lysis buffer as above, were immunoprecipitated with anti-RelA antibody and analysed by immunoblotting with anti-ubiquitin antibody. Levels of in vivo ubiquitinated overexpressed RelA were determined by pull-down of histidine-tagged ubiquitin (His6–ubiquitin) with Ni-NTA agarose beads. Cells were transfected with expression plasmids carrying His6–ubiquitin (4 μg), RelA (3 μg) and/or ORF73 (3 μg). When appropriate, cells were incubated in the presence of 10 μM of MG132 (Calbiochem). Transfected cells were lysed with ice-cold urea buffer containing 8 M urea, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM Na3VO4 and Complete. Cleared lysates were incubated for 3 h at 4°C with Ni-NTA beads. After incubation, beads were collected by centrifugation and washed three times with urea buffer. Proteins were eluted and denatured by boiling in Laemmli's buffer and analysed by immunoblotting with anti-RelA antibodies. RNA interference All oligonucleotides were purchased from Ambion. Pre-designed siRNAs for human ElonginC or Cullin5 were transiently transfected into HEK 293T cells, at a final concentration of 30 nM each. Non-targeting siRNAs were used as controls. At 48 h post-transfection, cells were processed for Ni-NTA pull down. In vitro ubiquitination assay Cell lysates from HEK 293T cells transiently expressing ORF73, or control transfected, were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc. Immunoprecipitates were resuspended in reaction buffer (40 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 60 mM potassium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2 and 10% glycerol) supplemented with recombinant ubiquitin (2.5 μg) (Biomol International), E1 (50 ng), UbcH5a E2 (100 ng) (Calbiochem), GST–RelA (2.5 μg) and/or ATP-regenerating buffer (Biomol International). Reactions were incubated for 1 h at 30°C, resolved by SDS–PAGE and analysed by immunoblotting with anti-GST antibody. Generation of recombinant viruses MuHV-4 vSOCS/vSOCSi recombinant viruses (with the amino-acid residues at positions 199, 202, 203 and 206 mutated to alanines) were independently generated by mutagenesis of the viral genome cloned as a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) (Adler et al, 2000). pCMVmyc-ORF73–SOCS was digested with HindIII and PciI to isolate the fragment harbouring the desired mutations, which was inserted into the BamHI-G genomic clone. Recombinant BamHI-G fragment was subcloned into the BamHI site of pST76K-SR shuttle plasmid. Shuttle plasmid was transformed into an Escherichia coli strain (DH10B) containing the wild-type MHV-68 BAC (pHA3). Following a multistep selection procedure, recombinant BAC clones were identified by the loss of the internal ORF73 KpnI restriction site. Both viruses were reconstituted as described (Pires de Miranda et al, 2008). v73FS recombinant virus was reported earlier (Fowler et al, 2003). Analysis of recombinant viruses BALB/c mice (Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Portugal) with 6–8 weeks of age were intranasally inoculated with 104 p.f.u. in 20 μl of PBS under halothane anaesthesia. At 3, 7, 10 and 14 days post-infection, lungs or spleens were removed and processed for subsequent analysis. Infectious virus titers in freeze-thawed lung homogenates were determined by suspension assay using BHK-21 cells. Latent viruses were examined using explant co-cultures of single-cell suspension splenocytes with BHK-21 cells. Plates were incubated for 4 (suspension assay) or 5 days (co-culture assay), fixed with 10% formal saline and counterstained with toluidine blue. Viral plaques were counted with a plate microscope. Frequencies of virus-genome-positive cells were determined by limiting dilution combined with real-time PCR, as described earlier (Marques et al, 2003). GC B-cell (B220+, PNAhigh) populations were cytometry purified from pools of five spleens using a BD FACSAria Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences). The purity of sorted populations was always >97%, as analysed by flow cytometry. Real-time PCR reactions were performed as reported (Pires de Miranda et al, 2008). In situ hybridisation was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded splenic sections using digoxigenin-labelled riboprobes, generated by T7 transcription of pEH1.4 (Simas et al, 1998). Supplementary Data Click here to view.(86K, pdf) Acknowledgments This study was supported by a grant to JPS from the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (POCI/BIA-BCM/60670/2004). LR was recipient of a fellowship from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Trends Biochem Sci. 1992 Apr; 17(4):135-40.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1992]Mol Cell. 2003 Jun; 11(6):1563-74.
[Mol Cell. 2003]Annu Rev Immunol. 2000; 18():621-63.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2000]J Cell Sci. 1997 Feb; 110 ( Pt 3)():369-78.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]J Exp Med. 2004 Jul 5; 200(1):107-13.
[J Exp Med. 2004]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Mar; 2(3):169-78.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Nat Immunol. 2007 Jun; 8(6):584-91.
[Nat Immunol. 2007]Mol Cell. 2003 Dec; 12(6):1413-26.
[Mol Cell. 2003]Oncogene. 2006 Oct 30; 25(51):6844-67.
[Oncogene. 2006]Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Apr; 26(8):3048-59.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2006]J Virol. 1996 Dec; 70(12):8527-33.
[J Virol. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1998 Feb 27; 273(9):5405-11.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]J Biol Chem. 2000 Nov 3; 275(44):34656-64.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Trends Microbiol. 1998 Jul; 6(7):276-82.
[Trends Microbiol. 1998]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Aug; 2(8):656-68.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004]Am J Pathol. 1994 Oct; 145(4):818-26.
[Am J Pathol. 1994]Nat Rev Immunol. 2001 Oct; 1(1):75-82.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2001]Nature. 1985 Feb 28-Mar 6; 313(6005):812-5.
[Nature. 1985]Gene. 1996 Oct 17; 176(1-2):67-72.
[Gene. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1999 May 7; 274(19):13594-603.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 May; 5(5):392-401.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1999 May 7; 274(19):13594-603.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Exp Med. 2004 Jul 5; 200(1):107-13.
[J Exp Med. 2004]PLoS Pathog. 2006 Oct; 2(10):e116.
[PLoS Pathog. 2006]Genes Dev. 2004 Dec 15; 18(24):3055-65.
[Genes Dev. 2004]PLoS Pathog. 2006 Oct; 2(10):e116.
[PLoS Pathog. 2006]J Gen Virol. 2003 Dec; 84(Pt 12):3405-16.
[J Gen Virol. 2003]PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27; 3(2):e1654.
[PLoS One. 2008]Oncogene. 2006 Oct 30; 25(51):6844-67.
[Oncogene. 2006]Mol Cell. 2003 Dec; 12(6):1413-26.
[Mol Cell. 2003]J Exp Med. 2004 Jul 5; 200(1):107-13.
[J Exp Med. 2004]Genes Dev. 2004 Dec 1; 18(23):2861-6.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 1; 15(23):3104-17.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Trends Microbiol. 1998 Jul; 6(7):276-82.
[Trends Microbiol. 1998]J Virol. 2008 Nov; 82(21):10436-43.
[J Virol. 2008]Blood. 2004 Dec 15; 104(13):4088-96.
[Blood. 2004]Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 Jan; 8(1):22-33.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2008]Immunity. 2001 Sep; 15(3):375-85.
[Immunity. 2001]PLoS Pathog. 2007 Jan; 3(1):e11.
[PLoS Pathog. 2007]J Virol. 2003 Jul; 77(13):7308-18.
[J Virol. 2003]Curr Opin Immunol. 2004 Aug; 16(4):456-62.
[Curr Opin Immunol. 2004]Gene. 1996 Oct 17; 176(1-2):67-72.
[Gene. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1999 May 7; 274(19):13594-603.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27; 3(2):e1654.
[PLoS One. 2008]J Virol. 2000 Aug; 74(15):6964-74.
[J Virol. 2000]PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27; 3(2):e1654.
[PLoS One. 2008]J Gen Virol. 2003 Dec; 84(Pt 12):3405-16.
[J Gen Virol. 2003]J Virol. 2003 Jul; 77(13):7308-18.
[J Virol. 2003]PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27; 3(2):e1654.
[PLoS One. 2008]J Gen Virol. 1998 Jan; 79 ( Pt 1)():149-53.
[J Gen Virol. 1998]J Virol. 2003 Feb; 77(4):2779-83.
[J Virol. 2003]