• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Cell. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 23, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2662698
NIHMSID: NIHMS94224

Digital signaling and hysteresis characterize Ras activation in lymphoid cells

Abstract

Activation of Ras proteins underlies functional decisions in diverse cell types. Two molecules, RasGRP and SOS, catalyze Ras activation in lymphocytes. Binding of active Ras to SOS′ allosteric pocket markedly increases SOS′ activity establishing a positive feedback loop for SOS-mediated Ras activation. Integrating in silico and in vitro studies, we demonstrate that digital signaling in lymphocytes (cells are “on” or “off”) is predicated upon feedback regulation of SOS. SOS′ feedback loop leads to hysteresis in the dose-response curve, which can enable a capacity to sustain Ras activation as stimuli are withdrawn and exhibit “memory” of past encounters with antigen. Ras activation via RasGRP alone is analog (graded increase in amplitude with stimulus). We describe how complementary analog (RasGRP) and digital (SOS) pathways act on Ras to efficiently convert analog input to digital output. Numerous predictions regarding the impact of our findings on lymphocyte function and development are noted.

INTRODUCTION

Activated Ras proteins regulate several cellular processes by acting on many substrates to affect signaling through diverse pathways (e.g., the MAPK pathway) (Campbell et al., 1998; Mor and Philips, 2006). Membrane-bound Ras proteins shuttle between inactive (GDP-bound) and active (GTP-bound) states. RasGDP binding to guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) results in nucleotide release, enabling nucleotide-free Ras to bind more abundant cellular GTP (Campbell et al., 1998). The intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras is enhanced by Ras GTPase activating proteins (RasGAPs) that promote Ras deactivation (Campbell et al., 1998).

Ras activation is important for the development of T and B lymphocytes and for their effector functions directed against invading pathogens (Genot and Cantrell, 2000). Antigen receptor stimulation of lymphocytes triggers uniquely high levels of Ras activation (Genot and Cantrell, 2000). Two families of RasGEFs are well-studied in lymphocytes: RasGRP1 and RasGRP3 (Ras guanyl nucleotide release protein) and SOS1 and SOS2 (Son of Sevenless) (Ebinu et al., 2000; Roose et al., 2005; Roose et al., 2007). RasGRP proteins, mainly restricted to the nervous and hematopoietic systems, are activated by binding to membrane localized diacylglycerol and by phosphorylation by protein kinase C (see Figures 2A and and4A).4A). SOS proteins are ubiquitous and are recruited to sites of receptor or adaptor tyrosine phosphorylation. SOS′ activity is regulated by membrane localization and is greatly accelerated upon binding of active RasGTP to a non-catalytic (allosteric) site. The functional consequences of such feedback regulation of SOS′ activity, and its interplay with the other GEF, RasGRP, were unknown.

Figure 2
Bimodal Ras activation induced by SOScat operating in the Ras signaling network occurs in a stochastic model and in a T cell line
Figure 4
Digital antigen receptor induced Ras activation in silico

An important issue in cell biology is to understand how cells respond in a decisive manner (digital) to the graded (analog) input of increasing amounts of receptor stimulation. Employing synergistic in silico and in vitro methods, we find that signaling in a population of lymphocytes is digital in character; i.e., a bimodal response emerges as stimulus is increased past a threshold. Digital signaling in individual cells requires SOS-mediated Ras activation. A further unanticipated characteristic of Ras activation via SOS is hysteresis in the dose-response curve; i.e., the response to the same stimulus dose depends upon whether the prevailing level of stimulus is achieved by increasing or decreasing the stimulus from its previous value. Our results suggest that bimodal responses and hysteresis also provide a mechanism for short-term molecular “memory”, making it easier to activate membrane-proximal signaling in previously stimulated cells. This may enable T lymphocytes to integrate signals from serial encounters with rare antigen-bearing cells.

We find that Ras activation via RasGRP alone increases in a graded fashion with stimulus (analog), and does not exhibit hysteresis. This is because, unlike SOS, RasGRP’s activity is not regulated by a positive feedback loop. Our results show how tuning the interplay between two complementary digital and analog signaling modules that activate the same substrate (Ras) leads to more efficient digital responses than if the digital pathway alone was employed. This may be a principle used broadly in biology.

Positive feedback regulation is one of many non-linear mechanisms that can result in “digital” responses of gene regulation programs and signaling networks (Barkai and Leibler, 2000; Bhalla and Iyengar, 1999; Elf and Ehrenberg, 2004; Ferrell, 2002; Kholodenko et al., 2002; McAdams and Arkin, 1997). We describe an example of how positive feedback regulation of a signaling module embedded in a complex signaling network leads to functionally important consequences in cells that orchestrate adaptive immunity. The concepts revealed by our study lead to a number of testable predictions pertinent to lymphocyte development and their ability to be activated in vivo by small doses of stimulatory ligands.

RESULTS

A positive feedback loop that regulates SOS activity results in digital signaling

Stimulated tyrosine kinase receptors (e.g., growth factor receptors, T cell receptors), recruit SOS to the plasma membrane by the adapter molecule, Grb2 (Genot and Cantrell, 2000). The Rem and Cdc25 domains in SOS are required for its GEF catalytic activity (Figure 1A), and we refer to them together as SOScat (SOS catalytic domain). SOS itself has very low GEF activity. Crystallographic and biochemical studies as well as experiments with cell lines show that the activity of SOScat is strongly influenced by a second Ras binding site which is distal to the GEF catalytic site (Margarit et al., 2003). Binding of RasGDP to this allosteric pocket results in a 5-fold increase in GEF activity, whereas binding of RasGTP effects a much larger (~ 75-fold) increase (Freedman et al., 2006; Sondermann et al., 2004). Thus, SOS-mediated Ras activation involves positive feedback regulation by its own catalytic product, RasGTP (Figure 1A).

Figure 1
A minimal model of the catalytic domain of SOS predicts three possible states of Ras activation

The activity of full-length SOS is inhibited by both N-terminal and C-terminal regions that flank SOScat (Figure S21A). Recruitment of SOS to the plasma membrane results in conformational changes that relieve this inhibition and allow RasGDP to bind to SOS′ catalytic site (Corbalan-Garcia et al., 1998). In agreement, expression of SOS1cat without these flanking sequences results in Ras signaling without the need for membrane targeting or external stimulus (Roose et al., 2007). We explored the consequences of positive feedback regulation of SOS by developing a mathematical model for the signaling module in Figure 1B wherein SOScat is uninhibited.

We first ignored stochastic fluctuations (Kampen, 1992) in the number of molecules participating in signaling, and developed a deterministic model describing the temporal evolution of the most probable number (or concentration) of the proteins involved in Ras activation via SOScat (Figure 1B). Table 1 summarizes the values of rate parameters that appear in the equations (Procedures). Only the ratios of certain parameters had been measured. Varying the individual parameters by factors of at least ten while keeping the ratio fixed did not affect the qualitative results (Figures S2–S4).

Table 1
Parameters used for the equations. Rates are calculated from the catalytic rates and/or the dissociation constants (KD) reported in the literature. For additional information see supplement, section I.

Figure 1C shows the theoretical steady-state dose-response curve for Ras activity as the amount of SOScat (α) is varied. For low or high levels of SOScat, there is one possible state characterized by low or high levels of active Ras, respectively. However, for intermediate levels of SOScat, three states of Ras activity are possible. The states shown in blue are unstable to small perturbations, and these states could exist only fleetingly. Therefore, for intermediate levels of SOScat, two possible dominant states of Ras activity could be simultaneously observed; i.e., a bistability is predicted. As the amount of SOScat is increased, the system could follow the lower stable branch until this was no longer possible, and then there would be a large jump in Ras activity (at point A). Thus, the dose-response curve could be very sharp. Importantly, bistability and the concomitant sharp threshold are abrogated if the positive feedback loop regulating SOS′ GEF activity is removed from the model (green line in Figure 1D and S2E).

Formulas obtained from a detailed analytical study (Supplement, Section VI) suggest that, in addition to feedback regulation of SOS, the minimal requirements for bistable Ras activity are: 1] catalytic Ras activation by SOS, with RasGTP bound to the allosteric site and 2] catalytic deactivation of RasGTP by RasGAPs. These features are true. The analytical treatment of simplified models also supports our numerical parameter sensitivity studies which show that our qualitative results are robust to wide variations in parameters as long as the basic ingredients described above are present.

We then investigated the potential effect of Ras activation via RasGRP1 on the bistable Ras activity driven by SOScat. A GEF, RasGRF, which is structurally related to RasGRP, is not dependent on feedback regulation by Ras (Freedman et al., 2006). So, we assumed that Ras is activated by RasGRP without feedback, and used the measured rate parameters for RasGRF since those for RasGRP are unknown. As shown in Figure 1E, bistability and sharp responses are predicted to disappear if RasGRP levels (or activity) are very high. This is because RasGRP activity, which is not subject to feedback regulation can convert most Ras molecules to its active form before the SOS feedback loop is engaged. Figure 1E also shows that low levels of RasGRP activity reduce the threshold for SOScat (α) to induce a sharp response. We show later that this is because absence of RasGRP makes it difficult to ignite the positive feedback loop regulating SOS′ GEF activity. These results suggest that an optimal level of expression or activity of RasGRP, the analog route to Ras activation, enables efficient deployment of feedback regulation of SOS which leads to bistability.

To explore the manifestations of these characteristics of Ras activation in lymphocytes (where stochastic variations between stimulated cells can be important), we carried out stochastic computer simulations of signaling events that might occur in lymphocytes (Figure 2A). The simulations were carried out using the Gillespie algorithm (Gillespie, 1977), which has been used profitably to study biological systems that exhibit multi-stability (Elf and Ehrenberg, 2004; McAdams and Arkin, 1997). Parameters not listed in Table 1 needed to carry out the simulations are provided in the supplement. The qualitative features of the results are robust to variations in unknown parameters over wide ranges (Tables S6–S8, Figures S5–S12). The purpose of our in silico studies was not quantitative recapitulation of known data, but to provide qualitative mechanistic insights that can be tested experimentally.

We carried out stochastic calculations using the amount of SOScat as a surrogate for the level of receptor stimulation. Many replicate dynamic simulations were carried out and levels of RasGTP at various time points were recorded (see Figure S30 for examples). Each simulation corresponds to assaying an individual lymphocyte. The combined results for all such in silico “cells” at a particular time point are displayed (Figure 2B). For low levels of SOScat, all simulations result in low levels of RasGTP, resulting in a single corresponding peak in the histogram. As SOScat is increased, this peak does not gradually move to higher values of RasGTP. Rather, beyond a threshold value of SOScat, a second peak corresponding to a much higher level of RasGTP emerges; the histogram is bimodal (Figure 2B). Thus, the sharp threshold and bistability shown in Figure 1C are manifested as digital signaling. The prediction is that lymphocytes are either “on” or “off” with regard to Ras activation.

To test these predictions, we used a Jurkat T cell line into which different amounts of SOS1cat and GFP were transfected together (Roose et al., 2007). Individual cell assays are required to compare experimental results with the histograms shown in Figure 2B. Analysis of active Ras for individual cells in a population is not possible in this transfection experiment, and so we examined upregulation of a cell surface activation marker CD69 by individual cells using flow cytometry. CD69 levels correlate with the strength of Ras-ERK signaling (Roose et al., 2007), but activation of signaling molecules downstream of Ras could be influenced by feedback regulation of modules such as the MAPK pathway (Ferrell, 2002; Kholodenko et al., 2002). We will address this issue directly below.

Low or high levels of SOS1cat expression led to unimodal cell populations with low or high levels of CD69 induction (Figure 2C and S21B). Intermediate levels of SOS1cat (red) induced a bimodal CD69 expression pattern in wild-type Jurkat T cells (Figure 2C). SOS1cat-induced bimodality was not observed for a control marker that is Ras-unresponsive (Figure S21C). These results in cells mirror the predictions of the computer simulations in that signaling is digital. We next tested the hypothesis emerging from our calculations (Figure 1C and Figure S2E) that the origin of digital signaling is feedback regulation of SOS-mediated Ras activation.

Experiments carried out with RasGRP1-deficient JPRM441 cells indicate the importance of this feedback loop. In contrast to wildtype cells (Figure 2C), intermediate levels of SOS1cat induced high CD69 expression levels in very few JPRM441 cells (13% in Figure 3A, top row). Similarly, intermediate levels of SOScat did not generate a bimodal response in computer simulations of the RasGRP deficient state (Figure 3B). Basal RasGRP1-mediated activation of Ras is not subject to feedback regulation, but can “ignite” the SOS feedback loop (Roose et al., 2007) by providing RasGTP which can bind SOS′ allosteric pocket and increase its activity 75-fold. Consistent with our computational results (Figure 1E), in RasGRP-deficient JPRM441 cells, lower basal levels of RasGTP make it more difficult to ignite the SOS feedback loop. Sufficiently high levels of SOScat can induce bimodal responses without RasGRP1 (Figures 3A, 3B, ,1E1E and S22) because RasGTP produced by the GEF activity of SOScat with RasGDP bound to the allosteric pocket can ultimately prime SOS′ feedback loop.

Figure 3
A RasGTP mimetic restores efficient SOScat –induced bimodal signals in RasGRP deficient cells

The computer simulation results suggested that a bimodal response would re-emerge in RasGRP-deficient cells for intermediate levels of SOS1cat if exogenous RasGTP molecules that bind to SOS′ allosteric pocket were added. To test this, we introduced Ras molecules like H-RasV12C40 (Roose et al., 2007) or H-RasG59E38 (Boykevisch et al., 2006) that are predominantly GTP loaded (because of the V12 or G59 mutation) and thus bind SOS′ allosteric pocket to increase GEF activity. These molecules also contain a second mutation (C40 or E38) that impairs binding to RAF and so do not directly activate the RAF-MEK-ERK-CD69 pathway; i.e., downstream pathways must be activated by endogenous Ras molecules.

In this type of assay, not all transfected cells start to express SOS1cat synchronously and SOS1cat expressing cells transit from low CD69 to high CD69 expression. It is therefore difficult to ascertain whether the response is bimodal or not by visual inspection. We adapted Hartigan’s test (Hartigan, 1985), which allows for a qualitative determination of whether a response in a population of cells is bimodal or unimodal. The generated histograms were divided into 120 equal portions and the mean fluorescence of CD69 and the number of cells in each portion were determined. Hartigan’s test confirmed that intermediate levels of SOS1cat when combined with H-RasG59E38 but not wt H-Ras restored bimodal signaling in RasGRP-deficient cells (Figure 3C, bottom row: B with p<0.01). The same level of SOS1cat or H-RasG59E38 alone also did not result in high CD69 expression (Figure 3C, top row, unimodal; U:p<0.01). Importantly, when the allosteric pocket in SOScat is mutated (SOS1cat-W729E), so that it can no longer interact with nucleotide-associated Ras proteins, adding H-RasG59E38 does not result in a bimodal pattern of signaling (Figure 3C, bottom row). Similar results were obtained with H-RasV12C40 (data not shown). Modeling this cell biological experiment is in concurrence with these results (Figure 3D). Therefore, the digital signaling we observe for ERK-CD69 signaling requires feedback regulation of SOS-mediated Ras activation.

There are two possible reasons for why digital signaling in lymphocytes originates in SOS-mediated Ras activation: (i) Ignition of the SOS feedback loop is necessary for generating sufficiently high levels of RasGTP required to prime downstream feedback loops that cause digital signaling (e.g., those associated with the MAPK pathway (Bhalla and Iyengar, 1999; Ferrell, 2002; Kholodenko et al., 2002). (ii) Digital signaling is controlled by feedback regulation of Ras activation by SOS. Whereas signaling is undoubtedly influenced by feedback regulation of downstream signaling modules, results described below suggest that, in lymphocytes, the latter scenario is true.

Receptor stimulation results in digital signaling with SOS and analog responses with RasGRP alone

The strength of lymphocyte receptor stimulation impacts outcomes (e.g., T cell activation, thymocyte development (Starr et al., 2003)). Therefore, we studied how SOS and RasGRP influence cellular responses as the amount of stimulatory ligands is varied.

We studied a simplified computational model for processes upstream of Ras activation (See section III, supplement). In short (see Figure 4A), receptor stimulation and phosphorylation generates activated ZAP-70 molecules. Activated-ZAP-70 phosphorylates the adaptor molecule LAT, which recruits both PLCγ and Grb2/SOS. PLCγ is then phosphorylated, and this generates IP3 and DAG. Induced DAG enhances RasGRP recruitment and activation. We do not incorporate cooperative effects associated with Grb2/SOS recruitment to LAT (Houtman et al., 2006). Including this feature would lead to sharper cellular responses (Prasad).

For weak receptor stimulation, as might occur under physiologic antigen receptor stimulation (Figure 4B), wildtype systems that have low initial levels of active Ras exhibit a bimodal pattern of signaling after a short time which ultimately becomes a unimodal distribution with high RasGTP (Figure 4B, left column). For very strong stimulation, a unimodal state of high RasGTP is rapidly reached (Figure 4C, left column). Without RasGRP, signaling is inhibited. Importantly, without SOS such systems demonstrate a graded response, indicating the analog character of RasGRP-mediated Ras activation (Figure 4C, middle column). Changing the values of the parameters (e.g., the numbers of RasGRP and SOS molecules) used to obtain the results shown in Figure 4 does not lead to qualitative changes (Tables S12–S13, Figures S13–S20).

To test these predictions, we determined the pattern of ERK phosphorylation in individual cells. First, 20,000 Jurkat T cells were either stimulated via the TCR or by PMA. The latter mimics a DAG-PKC-RasGRP pathway, but does not target SOS. Engagement of the TCR generated a unimodal P-ERK response at early timepoints that transitioned to a bimodal response at three minutes after stimulation (Figure 5A). In contrast, even strong stimulation via PMA never induced a bimodal ERK phosphorylation pattern and, instead, exhibited an analog response (Figure 5B).

Figure 5
RasGRP induces analog phospho-ERK signals, whilst SOS induces digital signals in B cell lines and primary T cells

Experiments with cells wherein genes of interest were deleted further support these results. Peripheral T cells do not develop in RasGRP1 deficient mice (Dower et al., 2000) and a selective SOS1−/−SOS2−/− peripheral T cell model to circumvent lethality due to SOS1 deficiency has not been generated (Wang et al., 1997). Therefore, we used a chicken DT40 B cell line in which pertinent genes have been genetically inactivated (Roose et al., 2007). We analyzed the ERK phosphorylation pattern of 20,000 cells (wildtype, SOS1−/−SOS2−/−, and RasGRP1−/−RasGRP3−/−) that were stimulated with increasing levels of B cell receptor (BCR) crosslinking-M4 monoclonal antibody.

Wildtype cells stimulated by low levels of M4, mimicking physiological lymphocyte stimulation by antigen, exhibited a bimodal pattern of ERK activation at the 3 and 10 minutes time points (Figure 5C “WEAK” and S24). Hartigan’s tests (Hartigan, 1985) confirmed that the response is bimodal. In contrast, SOS1−/−SOS2−/− DT40 B cells do not exhibit bimodal distributions at any time point regardless of stimulus level (Figure 5C, middle column). Thus, without SOS, signaling is analog in character regardless of strength of stimulus. Furthermore, while PMA-induced responses were severely impaired in RasGRP1−/− RasGRP3−/− cells (Figure 5D, right column), PMA induced very similar analog patterns of ERK phosphorylation in wildtype and SOS1−/−SOS2−/− DT40 B cells (Fig 5D, left and middle columns). These results reveal analog ERK responses from RasGRP-induced Ras activation, and that there is no intrinsic defect preventing SOS1−/− SOS2−/− DT40 B cells from turning on the Ras-ERK pathway.

This behavior in cell lines was mirrored in primary CD4 positive peripheral T cells. Ex vivo TCR stimulation of primary cells results in a digital pattern of ERK phosphorylation (Figure 5E), but PMA stimulation results in analog signaling (Figure 5F).

Thus, in Jurkat T cells, DT40 B cells, and primary lymph node T cells digital signaling requires engagement of the SOS pathway for Ras activation (Figs. 25). Notably, for all systems, the ERK response to PMA stimulation was analog at all doses tested, including those that generate high levels of RasGTP. This implies that the predicted analog Ras response in the absence of SOS (Fig. 4C, middle column) is not translated to digital responses by downstream signaling modules. If ignition of the positive feedback loop associated with SOS-mediated Ras activation only served to generate high levels of RasGTP that can stimulate digital signaling in a downstream module such as the MAPK pathway, a bimodal pattern of ERK activation should have been observed upon strong PMA stimulation. Since this is not so (Figure 5B and D), our results suggest that the digital signaling we observe for ERK and CD69 is not only predicated on positive feedback regulation of SOS-mediated Ras activation (Figure 3 and and4C),4C), but is controlled by it.

Prediction of hysteresis in Ras activation

Due to technical limitations, we are not able to carry out single cell assays of Ras activity. However, another related, but unanticipated characteristic that derives from our model, hysteresis, can be assessed by measuring Ras activation at the population level. Hysteresis is a direct consequence of bistability due to positive feedback regulation of SOS-mediated Ras activation (Figure 1), and the phenomenon and its biochemical origin is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Hysteresis at the level of RasGTP depends on SOS

When previously unactivated cells are stimulated, RasGTP levels are low. Hence, the allosteric site of most SOS molecules is occupied by RasGDP and SOS′ GEF activity is low. Increasing stimulus results in more RasGTP production, and an increase in the number of SOS molecules with RasGTP bound to the allosteric pocket, resulting in ignition of the positive feedback loop and a sharp increase in active Ras levels. These processes result in the black dose-response curve in Figure 6A, which is obtained from computer simulations where the initial RasGTP levels were set to zero.

A very different dose-response curve (red curve in Figure 6A) is predicted by computer simulations where the initial RasGTP level was set to a large value, and then the response to smaller stimulus levels were calculated. This is the predicted dose-response for cells that are first robustly stimulated such that a high RasGTP level is realized, then the stimulus is quickly reduced (as in removal of antigen), and the response assessed after a time period that is sufficient for a new active Ras level to be established. When cells that have been previously robustly activated are exposed to lower stimulus levels, most SOS molecules have RasGTP bound to the allosteric site and are characterized by high GEF activity. So, for the same stimulus level (or SOS targeted to the membrane), previously stimulated cells will exhibit a higher level of active Ras than previously unstimulated cells because in the former situation SOS is a more active enzyme. Concomitantly, the threshold stimulus required for robust Ras activation shifts to lower values (Figure 6A and B) for previously stimulated cells. However, this hysteretic effect will only be manifested for a finite period of time. Ultimately, RasGTP molecules bound to the allosteric site of SOS in previously stimulated cells will be displaced by RasGDP molecules as the amount of RasGTP in the cell declines because of lower stimulus levels. If the second stimulus level falls below a threshold, this process occurs very rapidly, and this is why hysteresis is not predicted for weak receptor stimulation.

SOS-dependent hysteresis in Ras activation

Experimental results for Jurkat T cells and DT40 B cells (Figures 6C–L) demonstrate the predicted hysteresis in Ras activation, and that it is due to the feedback loop associated with SOS and not due to feedback from downstream signaling modules.

Stimulation of Jurkat T cells using a maximal dose of TCR crosslinking antibody results in near maximal Ras activation after 3 minutes of stimulation (Figure S27A). Cells were also exposed to increasing concentrations of Src kinase inhibitor (PP2) to inhibit Lck (see Figure 4A) and interrupt signaling events upstream of Ras activation in a dose-dependent manner. PP2 was introduced simultaneously with the stimulus (t=0 min) or after cells reached maximal levels of RasGTP (t=3 min). RasGTP was analyzed at three minutes for PP2 added at t=0 min. If PP2 was added at t=3 min, RasGTP was assayed at seven minutes, thereby allowing a new balance with the reduced stimulus to be established. Computer simulations (Figure S27D) show that this protocol should allow us to test whether hysteresis occurs at the level of Ras as predicted in Figure 6A.

Figure 6C shows that TCR-induced RasGTP levels in wildtype Jurkat cells decrease when PP2 is added simultaneously with the stimulus, demonstrating a dependence on Src kinases (or stimulus level) for RasGTP generation that is akin to the black curve in Figure 6A for previously unstimulated cells. However, when PP2 is added at three minutes (stimulus lowered after stimulation), RasGTP levels are high at seven minutes even at high doses of PP2. This is akin to the red curve in Figure 6A, and demonstrates hysteresis because, in previously stimulated cells, RasGTP levels are relatively high between three and seven minutes in spite of a lower stimulus. After a sufficiently long time, as predicted, hysteresis is not observed (data not shown).

Importantly, these effects were not determined by feedback loops originating downstream of Ras. Preloading of cells with MEK1/2 inhibitor, U0126, efficiently blocks MEK and ERK phosphorylation but allows for RasGTP generation, albeit with slightly delayed kinetics (Figure S27A), but hysteresis was still observed (Figure 6D).

We also tested the prediction that SOS-mediated Ras activation underlies hysteresis by using the doubly SOS deficient DT40 cells. Maximal BCR crosslinking leads to similarly high-levels of RasGTP at three minutes in wildtype and SOS1−/−SOS2−/−cells (Figure S27B). Of note, RasGTP production is clearly impaired in moderately stimulated SOS1−/−SOS2−/− cells (Figure S27C). RasGTP levels in wildtype DT40 cells were sensitive to PP2 inhibition at the initiation of BCR stimulation. When cells were allowed to generate RasGTP for the first three minutes prior to PP2 addition, hysteresis was observed since RasGTP levels were high when compared to cases where the same dose of PP2 was added at the initiation of BCR stimulation (Figure 6E). In sharp contrast, SOS1−/−SOS2−/− cells do not exhibit hysteresis, and RasGTP levels decrease with increasing amounts of PP2 on the way up (PP2 at t=0) and the way down (PP2 at t=3) (Figure 6F).

Bistability and hysteresis provide Ras signaling memory during serial stimulation

T cell activation may require integration of membrane-proximal signals from sequential contacts (each approximately 3 minutes in duration) that occur between T cells and antigen presenting cells in lymphoid tissues (Bousso and Robey, 2003; Henrickson et al., 2008; Skokos et al., 2007). A molecular mechanism that enables T cells to “remember” past encounters with antigen is not known.

Suppose during a T cell-APC contact the quality and quantity of encountered pMHC ligands is sufficient to stimulate engagement of the SOS feedback loop and robust Ras activation, but insufficient for other events necessary for T cell activation. The T cell disengages from the APC, and is not subject to stimulation until it encounters another APC. During this period the stimulus is “off”, and active Ras levels decline because phosphatases act on pLAT (Figure 2) causing SOS to disengage from the membrane, RasGAPs reduce RasGTP levels during the time that the stimulus is “off”, etc.. Suppose that during the next encounter of this T cell with an APC it encounters a weak stimulus that would not result in robust Ras activation if this T cell had not been previously robustly stimulated. We asked whether the existence of an underlying bistable steady-state structure due to feedback regulation of SOS (Figure 1) would result in restoration of robust Ras activation upon weaker re-stimulation. If so, bistability and hysteresis would be manifested as a molecular memory that enables integration of serially encountered weak signals after exposure to a strong stimulus.

To explore this idea, we carried out calculations with the minimal model shown in Figure 1. Robust stimulation of active Ras due to high levels of SOScat was followed by suddenly removing the stimulus. We then studied the dynamics of re-stimulation with a weak stimulus (green) after the originally strong stimulus has been “off” for a certain time (Figure 6G). Increasing the duration of the resting phase reduces the RasGTP level at the time of re-stimulation, because of the RasGAPs present in our model. Figure 6G shows that maximal activation is recovered upon re-stimulation with a subsequent weaker stimulus, provided that RasGTP does not decline below the level of the unstable steady state (blue points in Figure 1C). If RasGTP levels decline to baseline during the duration when the stimulus is “off”, then RasGTP levels are low upon re-stimulation (Figure 6G, 500 sec. rest period). If there is no bistability and hysteresis as when SOScat is not subject to feedback regulation (or Ras is activated via RasGRP), restimulation with a weak stimulus results in low levels of Ras activation regardless of prior stimulation; i.e., there is no memory (Figure 6H).

Stimulation of Jurkat T cells or B cells with the plant lectin Concanavilin A (Con A) results in robust calcium responses that rely on binding of ConA to the TCR or BCR (Weiss et al., 1987). Importantly, binding of Con A can be relatively rapidly abrogated by addition of α-methyl-mannoside (α-MM), a competitive carbohydrate. We used this protocol to test the predictions in Figure 6G and 6H. Because T and B cells respond similarly to this protocol, we used the DT40 system as it enables testing the effects of SOS by genetic deletion (Figure 6I).

ConA stimulation resulted in robust Ras activation in both wildtype and SOS1−/−SOS2−/− DT40 B cells at 3 minutes (Figure 6J). Addition of α-MM treatment to robustly stimulated wildtype cells resulted in a decline in RasGTP levels. It is important to note that at 12 minutes, RasGTP levels still remained moderately above the basal level. Next, we tested the effect of a very weak stimulus of anti-BCR crosslinking antibody given at this 12-minute time point (see Figure 6K). Priming with ConA followed by α-MM treatment resulted in hyperresponsive RasGTP levels induced by this weak second signal that did not elicit a response when wildtype DT40 B cells were primed with PBS as a negative control (Figure 6K). In contrast, when doubly-deficient SOS1−/−SOS2−/− DT40 B cells were primed through the same regimen, we observed only minimal RasGTP stimulation by the second signal mediated by the BCR (Figure 6L). These data are consistent with the prediction (Figure 6G and H) that the underlying bistability and hysteresis due to feedback regulation of SOS confers memory to the dynamic responses of previously stimulated lymphoid cells.

DISCUSSION

Major findings

We combined theoretical analyses and stochastic computer simulations to study membrane-proximal signaling in lymphocytes, with a view toward understanding how activation of a key signaling intermediate in diverse cell types (Ras) is regulated. Experimental tests of these predictions using diverse approaches, and further in silico and in vitro studies lead to the following conclusions. A feedback loop associated with SOS-mediated Ras activation is necessary for digital signaling in lymphoid cells, and hysteresis in the dose-response curve for Ras activation. Digital signaling and hysteresis may also confer lymphocytes with short-term molecular memory of encounters with antigen (Figure 7). Alone, RasGRP-mediated Ras activation results in analog signaling in cell lines and lymph node T cells and does not exhibit hysteresis. But, intermediate levels of RasGRP activity lead to more efficient digital responses than with SOS alone. The interplay of differential activities of these two RasGEFs leading to efficient and varied cellular responses may be a principle that is employed more broadly and could have important implications for lymphocyte function. Our in silico and in vitro studies predict many phenomena that should be explored further.

Figure 7
Model of analog and digital signaling and hysteresis in lymphocytes

Further experimental tests of predicted Ras signaling characteristics

We have demonstrated that digital Ras-ERK signaling requires SOS in cells lines (Figure 5). Similar TCR-induced digital signals operate in primary T cells, but currently a direct demonstration of the involvement of SOS′ positive feedback loop in primary cells is lacking. Future work to address this point will be aided by the generation of the appropriate mouse models.

Compartmentalized Ras signaling has received considerable recent interest (Campbell et al., 1998; Mor and Philips, 2006). SOS activates Ras exclusively at the plasma membrane, but RasGRP can also function on internal membranes. It will of interest to investigate how analog (RasGRP) and digital (SOS) mechanisms of Ras activation occur in time and space as well as whether recently observed spatial nano-clustering of active Ras proteins (Tian et al., 2007) is influenced by positive feedback regulation of Ras activation.

In other cell types digital signaling has been reported to rely on a positive feedback loop between MAPK and phospholipase A2 (Bhalla and Iyengar, 1999). Phospholipase A2 is, however, not expressed in T and B lymphocytes (Gilbert et al., 1996). This may be why digital signaling in lymphocytes is controlled by feedback regulation of SOS′ GEF activity. Nonetheless, feedback loops present in the MAPK pathway (Ferrell, 2002; Kholodenko et al., 2002) undoubtedly further modulate our measurements of CD69 and ERK activation, and it will be important to examine how. Such investigations could help resolve puzzles such as why in SOS1−/−SOS2−/− cells RasGTP levels are lower when PP2 is added after robust stimulation compared to when the inhibitor is added at t=0, or why wildtype Jurkat and DT40 cells exhibit more pronounced hysteresis for higher doses of PP2 (Figure 6). These studies may also resolve whether delayed action of nuclear phosphatases that turn off ERK cause apparent hysteresis in ERK activation in SOS−/− DT40 cells without bistability (Figure S28).

Predicted functional implications of digital signaling and hysteresis

The sharp threshold in the dose-response curve (i.e., digital signaling) originating from feedback regulation of SOS′ GEF activity may provide an additional membrane-proximal checkpoint that prevents spurious T cell activation. Weak receptor stimulation could lead to low levels of TCR and ZAP-70 activation that do not efficiently recruit SOS to the membrane or produce sufficiently large levels of RasGTP via the RasGRP pathway. Thus, the SOS feedback loop will not ignite (Figure 7A), and the resulting low levels of downstream signaling will prevent spurious T cell activation in response to weak stimulation. In contrast, when receptor stimulation exceeds a threshold, the SOS feedback loop will be engaged resulting in a sharp/digital increase in downstream signaling. It has been suggested that digital ERK signaling, along with feedback regulation of Lck, may enable discrimination between ligands of varying potency (Altan-Bonnet and Germain, 2005).

If early signaling events do result in robust Ras activation, it would be undesirable to shut down signaling due to fluctuations in receptor-ligand binding. Hysteresis in the dose-response curve may stabilize signaling once it has proceeded past this checkpoint. We predict hysteresis to be observed for a finite time interval and for stimulus levels that are not far below the threshold. This may ensure that if the signal is absent for a sufficiently long time or falls below a threshold, signaling is terminated.

In vivo infections result in very low numbers of cognate peptide-MHC complexes on most APCs in lymphoid tissues. Recent studies have suggested that T cell activation in such circumstances requires integration of interrupted serial encounters with APCs bearing cognate ligands (Henrickson et al, 2008). Our results suggest that, if a T cell’s membrane-proximal signaling machinery is robustly stimulated once, the short-term molecular memory conferred by feedback regulation of SOS (Figure 6) could enable subsequent weaker signals to robustly stimulate these cells, thereby enabling signal integration. This concept could be examined by combining intravital microscopy with imaging of signaling products such as Ras to test whether hysteresis during Ras activation plays a role in signal integration in vivo.

The threshold potency above which strongly binding ligands negatively select thymocytes in the thymus is very sharp while the positive selection threshold is graded (Daniels et al., 2006). This may be because negative selection results from strong signaling requiring active Ras levels that can be realized only upon ignition of the SOS feedback loop. The resulting digital response may correspond to the sharp boundary separating ligands that induce positive and negative selection in the thymus. Weak stimulation may only activate Ras via the RasGRP pathway, thereby eliciting purely analog responses during positive selection. This potential ability of RasGRP and SOS acting to mediate either analog or digital signaling which impacts T cell development needs to be further examined in mouse models developed with the aim of impairing analog or digital signaling.

Experimental Procedures

Mean-field equations for the minimal model shown in Figure 1

The minimal model is based on the following reactions shown in Figure 1A. The mass action rate equations corresponding to those reactions are,

d[S]dt=k1[S][RD]+k1[SRD]k2[S][RT]+k2[SRT]
(1a)
d[SRT]dt=k2[S][RT]k2[SRT]
(1b)
d[RT]dt=k2[S][RT]+k2[SRT]+k3cat[RD][SRT]K3m+[RD]+k4cat[RD][SRD]K4m+[RD]k5cat[RGAP][RT]K5m+[RT]
(1c)

The total number of SOS and Ras molecules are conserved which leads to the following constraints:

α=[S]+[SRD]+[SRT]β=[RD]+[RT]+[SRD]+[SRT]

In the above equations, [X] represents the concentration of the species, X. The abbreviations used for different species are:

SSOSRDRasGDPRTRasGTPSRDSOSRasGDPSRTSOSRasGTPRGAPRasGAP

The Michealis constants are defined as, K3m=(k3cat+k3)/k3;K4m=(k4cat+k4)/k4;K5m=(k5cat+k5)/k5, where, kn, kn are the binding, unbinding rates of the substrate (S) to the enzyme (E), respectively, and kncat is the rate of production of the product (P) from the complex (ES). The reaction is shown schematically below:

E+Skn;knESkncatE+P.

K3m, K4m and K5m are calculated from Table S1. For the ODE in Eq.(1), reactions, #1 and #2 in Table S1, for Eq.(2), reaction, #2 in Table S1, and for Eq.(3), reactions, #2, #3, #4 and #5 are used. For the reactions in #3, #4 and #5 in Table S1, we used the Michaelis Menten form, and the Michaelis constants are calculated from the binding, unbinding and the catalytic rates of the reactions as described above. In many cases, the KD(=koff/kon) values are known for the reactions but the binding (kon) and unbinding (koff) rates are not known. Therefore, we carried out parameter sensitivity analyses, and our results are robust to up to 10-fold variations of the parameters. The details of this analysis are shown in Table S3. The left hand sides of Eqs. 1ac are set to zero and the algebraic equations are solved for the steady-state concentrations.

Stochastic simulations of the model shown in Figures 2 and and44

We performed stochastic simulations which effectively solve the Master equation (Kampen, 1992) corresponding to the chemical reactions in the signaling network shown in Figure 2a using the Gillespie algorithm (Bortz B, 1975; Gillespie, 1977; McAdams and Arkin, 1997). Simulation details and rather exhaustive parameter sensitivity analyses are provided in the supplement (Sections II and III).

Cell biological procedures

All cell biological procedures are described in the supplement, Section IV, pages 67–72.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Kurosaki for DT40 lines and Dr. Dafna Bar-sagi for the H-RasG59E38 plasmid. We are grateful to Dr. DeFranco and members of the Weiss, Chakraborty, and Roose labs for critically reading of the manuscript. We apologize to colleagues we could not cite due to space constraints. Financial support: NIH Director’s Pioneer Award and 1PO1 (AKC), the Howard Hughes Medical Institute as well as the Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center for Arthritis (AW), and the Sandler Foundation (JR).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • Altan-Bonnet G, Germain RN. Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback control of digital ERK responses. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Barkai N, Leibler S. Circadian clocks limited by noise. Nature. 2000;403:267–268. [PubMed]
  • Bhalla US, Iyengar R. Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science. 1999;283:381–387. [PubMed]
  • Bortz BKMH, Lebowitz JL. Journal of Computational Physics. 1975;17
  • Bousso P, Robey E. Dynamics of CD8(+) T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes. Nature immunology. 2003;4:579–585. [PubMed]
  • Boykevisch S, Zhao C, Sondermann H, Philippidou P, Halegoua S, Kuriyan J, Bar-Sagi D. Regulation of ras signaling dynamics by Sos-mediated positive feedback. Curr Biol. 2006;16:2173–2179. [PubMed]
  • Campbell SL, Khosravi-Far R, Rossman KL, Clark GJ, Der CJ. Increasing complexity of Ras signaling. Oncogene. 1998;17:1395–1413. [PubMed]
  • Corbalan-Garcia S, Margarit SM, Galron D, Yang SS, Bar-Sagi D. Regulation of Sos activity by intramolecular interactions. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:880–886. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Daniels MA, Teixeiro E, Gill J, Hausmann B, Roubaty D, Holmberg K, Werlen G, Hollander GA, Gascoigne NR, Palmer E. Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling. Nature. 2006;444:724–729. [PubMed]
  • Dower NA, Stang SL, Bottorff DA, Ebinu JO, Dickie P, Ostergaard HL, Stone JC. RasGRP is essential for mouse thymocyte differentiation and TCR signaling. Nature immunology. 2000;1:317–321. [PubMed]
  • Ebinu JO, Stang SL, Teixeira C, Bottorff DA, Hooton J, Blumberg PM, Barry M, Bleakley RC, Ostergaard HL, Stone JC. RasGRP links T-cell receptor signaling to Ras. Blood. 2000;95:3199–3203. [PubMed]
  • Elf J, Ehrenberg M. Spontaneous separation of bi-stable biochemical systems into spatial domains of opposite phases. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 2004;1:230–236. [PubMed]
  • Ferrell JE. Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2002;14:140–148. [PubMed]
  • Freedman TS, Sondermann H, Friedland GD, Kortemme T, Bar-Sagi D, Marqusee S, Kuriyan J. A Ras-induced conformational switch in the Ras activator Son of sevenless. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16692–16697. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Genot E, Cantrell DA. Ras regulation and function in lymphocytes. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000;12:289–294. [PubMed]
  • Gilbert JJ, Stewart A, Courtney CA, Fleming MC, Reid P, Jackson CG, Wise A, Wakelam MJ, Harnett MM. Antigen receptors on immature, but not mature, B and T cells are coupled to cytosolic phospholipase A2 activation: expression and activation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 correlate with lymphocyte maturation. J Immunol. 1996;156:2054–2061. [PubMed]
  • Gillespie DT. Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical-Reactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1977;81:2340–2361.
  • Hartigan JA, Hartigan PM. The Dip Test of Unimodality. Annals of Statistics. 1985:15.
  • Henrickson SE, Mempel TR, Mazo IB, Liu B, Artyomov MN, Zheng H, Peixoto A, Flynn MP, Senman B, Junt T, et al. T cell sensing of antigen dose governs interactive behavior with dendritic cells and sets a threshold for T cell activation. Nature immunology. 2008;9:282–291. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Houtman JC, Yamaguchi H, Barda-Saad M, Braiman A, Bowden B, Appella E, Schuck P, Samelson LE. Oligomerization of signaling complexes by the multipoint binding of GRB2 to both LAT and SOS1. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2006;13:798–805. [PubMed]
  • Kampen NGv. Rev and enl edn. Amsterdam; New York, North-Holland: 1992. Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry.
  • Kholodenko BN, Kiyatkin A, Bruggeman FJ, Sontag E, Westerhoff HV, Hoek JB. Untangling the wires: a strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:12841–12846. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Margarit SM, Sondermann H, Hall BE, Nagar B, Hoelz A, Pirruccello M, Bar-Sagi D, Kuriyan J. Structural evidence for feedback activation by Ras.GTP of the Ras-specific nucleotide exchange factor SOS. Cell. 2003;112:685–695. [PubMed]
  • McAdams HH, Arkin A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:814–819. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mor A, Philips MR. Compartmentalized Ras/MAPK signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:771–800. [PubMed]
  • Prasad A, Zikherman J, Das J, Roose JP, Weiss A, Chakraborty AK. Origin of the sharp boundary that discriminates positive and negative selection of thymocytes. PNAS. in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Roose JP, Mollenauer M, Gupta VA, Stone J, Weiss A. A Diacylglycerol-Protein Kinase C-RasGRP1 Pathway Directs Ras Activation upon Antigen Receptor Stimulation of T Cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:4426–4441. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Roose JP, Mollenauer M, Ho M, Kurosaki T, Weiss A. Unusual interplay of two types of Ras activators, RasGRP and SOS, establishes sensitive and robust Ras activation in lymphocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:2732–2745. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ruiz S, Santos E, Bustelo XR. RasGRF2, a guanosine nucleotide exchange factor for Ras GTPases, participates in T-cell signaling responses. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:8127–8142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Skokos D, Shakhar G, Varma R, Waite JC, Cameron TO, Lindquist RL, Schwickert T, Nussenzweig MC, Dustin ML. Peptide-MHC potency governs dynamic interactions between T cells and dendritic cells in lymph nodes. Nature immunology. 2007;8:835–844. [PubMed]
  • Sondermann H, Soisson SM, Boykevisch S, Yang SS, Bar-Sagi D, Kuriyan J. Structural analysis of autoinhibition in the Ras activator Son of sevenless. Cell. 2004;119:393–405. [PubMed]
  • Starr TK, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. Positive and negative selection of T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:139–176. [PubMed]
  • Tian T, Harding A, Inder K, Plowman S, Parton RG, Hancock JF. Plasma membrane nanoswitches generate high-fidelity Ras signal transduction. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:905–914. [PubMed]
  • Wang DZ, Hammond VE, Abud HE, Bertoncello I, McAvoy JW, Bowtell DD. Mutation in Sos1 dominantly enhances a weak allele of the EGFR, demonstrating a requirement for Sos1 in EGFR signaling and development. Genes Dev. 1997;11:309–320. [PubMed]
  • Weiss A, Shields R, Newton M, Manger B, Imboden J. Ligand-receptor interactions required for commitment to the activation of the interleukin 2 gene. J Immunol. 1987;138:2169–2176. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...