![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright Kita-Matsuo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Lentiviral Vectors and Protocols for Creation of Stable hESC Lines for Fluorescent Tracking and Drug Resistance Selection of Cardiomyocytes 1Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, California, United States of America 2Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America 3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America 4Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America Mikhail V. Blagosklonny, Editor Ordway Research Institute, United States of America * E-mail: mmercola/at/burnham.org Conceived and designed the experiments: HKM MB NP NGS KW JGJ BN ADM JP HSVC MM. Performed the experiments: HKM MB NP NGS KW JGJ BN SS RH CK MT RB DC HSVC. Analyzed the data: HKM MB NP NGS JGJ SS RH CK DC ADM JP BRC HSVC MM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CK AVT ADM BRC HSVC. Wrote the paper: HKM HSVC MM. ¤Current address: Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America Received October 22, 2008; Accepted February 17, 2009. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background Developmental, physiological and tissue engineering studies critical to the development of successful myocardial regeneration therapies require new ways to effectively visualize and isolate large numbers of fluorescently labeled, functional cardiomyocytes. Methodology/Principal Findings Here we describe methods for the clonal expansion of engineered hESCs and make available a suite of lentiviral vectors for that combine Blasticidin, Neomycin and Puromycin resistance based drug selection of pure populations of stem cells and cardiomyocytes with ubiquitous or lineage-specific promoters that direct expression of fluorescent proteins to visualize and track cardiomyocytes and their progenitors. The phospho-glycerate kinase (PGK) promoter was used to ubiquitously direct expression of histone-2B fused eGFP and mCherry proteins to the nucleus to monitor DNA content and enable tracking of cell migration and lineage. Vectors with T/Brachyury and α-myosin heavy chain (αMHC) promoters targeted fluorescent or drug-resistance proteins to early mesoderm and cardiomyocytes. The drug selection protocol yielded 96% pure cardiomyocytes that could be cultured for over 4 months. Puromycin-selected cardiomyocytes exhibited a gene expression profile similar to that of adult human cardiomyocytes and generated force and action potentials consistent with normal fetal cardiomyocytes, documenting these parameters in hESC-derived cardiomyocytes and validating that the selected cells retained normal differentiation and function. Conclusion/Significance The protocols, vectors and gene expression data comprise tools to enhance cardiomyocyte production for large-scale applications. Introduction The minimal ability of the adult human heart to regenerate lost or damaged cardiomyocytes has led to an intense effort to direct human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) to form cardiomyocytes in order to model human heart disease and develop therapies [1]. hESC-derived cardiomyocytes resemble immature human fetal cardiomyocytes by multiple criteria, including electrophysiology [2], [3], calcium handling [3], [4], [5], force generation [5], and contractile protein expression and myofibrillar structure [6]. Since hESC-derived cardiomyocytes have the potential to engraft into surgical models of heart disease [7], [8], they have been considered for cardiomyocyte replacement therapy and as well as a tool to discover drugs capable of stimulating endogenous regeneration. Despite such encouraging advances, the application of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes for basic developmental research and large-scale applications, such as high throughput screening, toxicology testing and large animal studies, has been hindered by their poor yield from the heterogeneous hESC cultures and the difficulty of manipulating hESCs to express uniform levels of reporter constructs. We have therefore developed methods and vectors to produce homogeneous hESC lines with fluorescent and drug-selectable markers that permit isolation of pure populations of labeled stem cells and hESC-derived cardiomyocytes. Prior strategies to increase the yield of cardiomyocytes from hESCs have included optimizing culture regimens by the addition of growth factors and other reagents to direct differentiation [7], [9], [10]. Although such advances quantitatively improved the proportion of the cells that differentiate into cardiomyocytes, in most settings the yield remains between 5–25%. Strategies for enrichment have included manual dissection of beating areas [10], [11], Percoll® density gradient sedimentation [7], [12], and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of cells based on expression of a fluorescent reporter protein from cardiomyocyte gene promoters [11], [13]. Each of these strategies has drawbacks in terms of purity (density gradient sedimentation and manual dissection), viability (FACS) and scalability (FACS and manual dissection). In theory, an effective alternative is drug resistance based selection of cardiomyocytes as successfully implemented by Field and collaborators using the Neomycin analogue G418 to purify cardiomyocytes from differentiating mouse ESC cultures [14]. Genetic selection has recently been adapted to hESCs [15], and we applied this technology with a suite of lentiviral vectors and protocols for the production of stable, homogenous and clonal lines of hESCs with Neomycin, Blasticidin and Puromycin resistance cassettes for drug selection of undifferentiated stem cells and functional hESC-derived cardiomyocytes. Additional vectors were constructed to produce hESC lines with eGFP and mCherry fluorescent reporters of mesoderm and cardiac lineages and also fluorescent Histone2B (H2B) fusion proteins that allow real-time sensing of the DNA content and recognition by automated algorithms for cell screening and tracking. We used 3 criteria (electrophysiological characterization of action potentials, force generation, and gene expression profile) to validate that the isolation procedure did not adversely affect the cardiomyocytes, indicati that the drug-isolated cardiomyocytes were physiologically normal. Results Isolation of homogeneous lines of reporter hESCs Lentiviral infection of hESCs commonly results in functional transgene expression in only a fraction of the total cells, even at high multiplicity of infection, illustrated by the typically mixed colony of mCherry-labeled and unlabeled hESCs (Figure 1B
Nuclear localized fluorescent proteins are useful for cell tracking. Moreover, a label that shows a temporal change, such as correlation with DNA content, can be used in correction routines for during automated tracking [16], for instance to distinguish tracks of two cells that cross paths from two daughters arising from a single progenitor. To test utility of the nuclear fluorescent proteins in tracking applications, differentiating cells of the FACS-enriched hESCs were tracked automatically using a modified version of the Particle Tracking Plugin for ImageJ [17]. Fig. 2C Comparison of the integrated fluorescence intensity of H2BmCherry to that of DAPI in the overall population after end-point fixation and flow cytometry yielded a squared correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.733, indicating that H2BmCherry brightness is not as accurate a measure of DNA content as is DAPI staining. Nonetheless, we examined whether the H2B fluorescent fusion proteins could be used to report DNA content in real time by imaging PGK-H2BmCherry cells at the border of an undifferentiated hESC colony for a period of 2 days and analyzing the levels of fluorescence intensity during instances of cell division (Figure 2B Method for clonal expansion of engineered hESC lines In order to create homogeneous populations of fluorescent reporter lines for quantitative applications, such as for high throughput biology or for using biosensors to measure intracellular signaling activity or subcellular constituents, we developed a protocol for clonal expansion of single cells (Figure 3A
Engineered clonal hESCs retain pluripotency, as demonstrated by expression of hTERT, nanog, Rex-1 and Oct4 (Figure 4K
T/Brachyury promoter eGFP reporter vectors To visualize mesodermal outgrowths in hESC cultures, we used a portion of the T/Brachyury promoter [20] that contains elements shown to direct directs transcription in primitive streak-stage mesendoderm, including cardiomyocyte precursors, in transgenic mouse embryos [21]. Although absent in undifferentiated hESCs, eGFP fluorescence directed from the T/brachyury promoter vector (Figure 1A
Drug resistance cassettes for selection of stem cells and differentiated lineages Drug selection cassettes were developed to enable co-selection of stable hESC lines with integrated promoter-reporter constructs that are not expressed in stem cells but only in differentiated lineages. Neomycin (Neor) and Blasticidin (Blar) resistance genes were placed under control of the Rex-1 promoter (Figure 1A To create hESC lines for the efficient purification of cardiomyocytes, a dual selectable marker cassette lentivirus was constructed containing either the Rex-Neor or Rex-Blar cassettes together with the αMHC promoter directing transcription of the Puromycin resistance gene (αMHC-Puror_Rex-Neor and αMHC-Puror_Rex-Blar; Figure 1A
The dual drug selection protocol for isolation of cardiomyocytes from hESCs is diagrammed in Figure 6A = 10 independent biological replicates) after Puror selection (Figure 6HThe incorporation of Neor and Blar cassettes into different vectors (Figure 1A Gene array profile of Neor, Puror-selected hESC-derived cardiomyocytes A major advantage of the CS selection protocol is that it permits developmental, genetic and physiological studies of cardiomyocytes without the potentially confounding influence of other cells present in normally heterogeneous EBs. To demonstrate this approach and begin to validate that the selected cardiomyocytes retained normal function, we compared human Affymetrix exon array data from the day 40 CSs to undifferentiated hESCs, which had been treated with G418 to ensure that they were free of differentiated cells. 3030 genes were up- or down-regulated in the day 40 CSs relative to the hESCs. Further comparison of these day 40 CS profiles to adult heart arrays identified 6 out of 9 gene clusters with analogous expression profiles (Figure 7B
Neor, Puror-selected hESC-derived cardiomyocytes exhibit action potentials consistent with early embryonic fetal cardiomyocytes We next verified that the drug selection protocol does not adversely affect the electrophysiological phenotypes of the cardiomyocytes. Electrophysiological phenotypes of cardiomyocytes in the Neor, Puror-selected CSs at day 20 of differentiation (8 days after Puromycin treatment of day 12 EBs) were obtained by intra-cellular recording techniques (see Methods). As shown in Figure 8A
Force generation of isolated hESC-derived cardiomyocytes As a third validation of the dual drug selection protocol, contractile forces in individual, selected cardiomyocytes were measured using a method of dynamic traction force microscopy as described [see Methods and 29]. CSs were dispersed and individual cardiomyocytes plated onto polyacrylamide gels (Figure 9A = 11) contracted with an average axial force of 139±29 nN and a total force of 144±33 nN. These values did not change appreciably with time in culture after isolation (up to 90 days, not shown). For comparison, NRVCs contracted with an average axial force of 202±47 nN and a total force of 222±54 nN on the same gels using the same protocol (Supplemental Figure S2C). Cell spread area between these cells is similar and the differences in total force are primarily due to differences in generated traction. NRVCs had a higher aspect ratio, calculated as the length of the long axis divided by the length of the short axis, than the hESC-derived myocytes, of 4.2+/−0.2 versus 3.0+−0.3. However, the ratio of the axial to total force was 0.93+/−0.02 in the hESC-derived cells and 0.93+/−0.02 in NRVCs, indicating that variations in morphological alignment did not impact the polarization of force generation. Average velocity of contractions was measured as 6.9±2.1 µm/s for hESC-derived cardiomyocytes and 9.7±1.5 µm/s for NRVCs. Thus, drug-selected hESC-derived cardiomyocytes generated contractile force comparable to that of NRVCs providing further evidence of normal behavior after selection from the engineered hESCs.
Discussion We describe single cell cloning and drug selection procedures methods and a suite of lentiviral vectors to engineer hESC lines for visualization, tracking and purification of pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated cardiomyocyte derivatives. These methods overcome variegation and downregulation of fluorescent reporters and other markers observed without enrichment (Figure 1 Although the experiments shown were performed using H9 cells (WiCell WA09), similar outcomes were obtained with the PGK-H2B fluorescent protein vectors, Rex- and αMHC-driven fluorescent and selectable markers using HUES13 (Harvard) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hIPSCs) derived in our laboratory. Dual cassette lentiviral vectors were developed to enable drug selection of pluripotent stem cells with G418 or Blasticidin and cardiomyocytes with Puromycin. The two-stage selection procedure (Figure 6 The hESC-derived cardiomyocytes generated contractile forces characteristic of fetal cardiomyocytes, illustrating the utility of the approach for developmental and physiological studies and providing further validation that the cardiomyocytes produced by drug selection from the engineered hESCs were normal by multiple physiological criteria. It should be noted that these measurements were performed on gels with mechanical properties (4 kPa) much softer than the adult myocardium (10–20 kPa) in order to improve the resolution of the dynamic traction force microscopy, which increases as the shortening length increases, and also to approximate conditions for fetal myocardium, which has less collagen content than adult heart. Reduced stiffness is expected to result in lower force because increased shortening decreases force generation. It is to be expected that more mature cells would generate much greater contractile force. For comparison, we found that adult cardiomyocytes from rabbits at slack length contraction, with sarcomere lengths near 1.8 µm, generate forces ranging from 500 nN to 2700 nN depending on the stimulation frequency[31]. Active stresses in these cells are again an order of magnitude greater than the hESC-derived cardiomyocytes, ranging from 3000 to 5000 Pa. In addition, the two-dimensional geometry of this cell culture could further decrease the force generated compared to a more physiological three-dimensional environment. Cell tracking using the PGK-H2BmCherry- and PGK-H2BeGFP-containing vectors will enable stem cells and their differentiated derivatives, regardless of lineage, to be followed in cell mixing and in vivo engraftment studies. The heritable and ubiquitously expressed reporters can be used to quantify regeneration of functional cardiomyocytes as well as persistence of non-cardiomyocyte derivatives of the graft, such as fibroblasts or de-differentiated cells as well as residual stem cells with tumorigenic potential. Moreover, application of the H2B fluorescent fusion proteins as sensors of DNA content in a 2-D tracking study (Figure 2B In conclusion, we have described a toolbox of lentiviral vectors and protocols for cell line creation and isolation of pure cardiomyocytes that provide the means for a wide range of studies aimed at improving cardiomyocyte differentiation from stem cells and their functional incorporation into damaged myocardium. Methods hESCs and culture conditions Low passage hESCs (H9, WiCell) were used. Similar results were obtained using HUES13 (Harvard) and hIPSCs derived in our laboratory. Undifferentiated hESCs were cultured as described [33] with slight modification. Briefly, cells were cultured in Knockout Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (KODMEM, Invitrogen, 10829-018) supplemented with 1 mM L-glutamine with 20% Knockout Serum Replacement medium (KOSR, Invitrogen), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (NEAA, Invitrogen), 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen) and 8 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, Sigma catalogue F0291-25UG). hESCs were grown on Matrigel (growth factor-reduced, BD Bioscience)-coated 6-well plates (Corning, Inc. catalogue 3506) on a feeder layer of primary MEFs from E13.5 CD-1 mice isolated as described [33]. Passage 3 to 4 MEFs were gamma-irradiated with 3,000 rads (30 Grays) and plated at 104 cells per cm2. All hESC lines were passaged following enzymatic digestion with either collagenase IV (Invitrogen, 17104-019) approximately every 7 days or Accutase (Chemicon) approximately every 10 days [34], depending on cell condition and confluency. For collagenase treatment, cells were exposed to 1 mg/ml in KODMEM, sterile filtered, at room temperature. Once the edge of colonies were about to lift from the plate, the cells were rinsed twice with DPBS (Ca2+- and Mg2+-free), culture medium was added and cells were mechanically dispersed into 100–500-cell clusters by trituration using a 5 ml pipette and re-plated. For Accutase treatment, cells were washed twice with DPBS and then subsequently washed with a small amount of Accutase (1× concentration, Innovative Cell Technologies) and then exposed to Accutase at room temperature. After a few minutes, when MEFs and hESC-derived fibroblasts began to lift from the plate, accutase was removed and hESCs were washed twice with DPBS (Ca2+- and Mg2+-free) to remove MEFs and hESC-derived fibroblasts. A third of the volume of culture medium normally used was added and the stem cells were mechanically dispersed into 10–50-cell clusters by trituration as above. Each passage was a 1 3 split ratio for collagenase IV-treated cells and 1 4 to 1 6 ratio for accutase-treated cells. Cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma (MycoAlert; Cambrex, Walkersville, MD).Lentivirus vector design, preparation and hESC infection The SIN18.WPRE lentiviral vector [35] was modified by insertion of the promoter regions and the drug selectable or fluorescent proteins (Figure 1A SIN18.WPRE-based lentivirus production in HEK 293T cells was as previously described [35], [37], followed by purification and concentration by ultra-centrifugation. Briefly, three plasmids (transfer vector with expression construct, the packaging plasmid pCMVΔR8.74, and the VSV-G envelope protein expression plasmid pMD.G) were mixed in a ratio of 3 2 1 and 293T cells were transiently transfected using calcium phosphate method and viral supernatant from the transfected plate was collected every 24 hours in serum-free Ultraculture medium (Bio-Whitttaker #12-725F) with 1 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin up to 4 days after the transfection. The pooled viral supernatant was concentrated by ultracentrifugation at 21,000 rpm for 2 hours at 4°C, passed through 0.22 or 0.4 µm filters, and aliquots were used to transfect the hESCs.For infection, confluent hESCs, in one well of a 6-well plate, were lightly dissociated with 1 mg/ml collagenase 7 days after the last passage and rinsed twice with DPBS. The small cell clumps of approximately 100 to 200 cells were resuspended in 1 ml of culture medium and collected upon settling in 15 ml conical tube for 5 min at room temperature. 500 µl of the supernatant was exchanged with fresh 400 µl fresh media and 8 µg of polybrene. Finally 100 µl of the concentrated virus supernatant was added and mixed with the cells and incubated at 37°C for 4 to 6 hrs. The cell/virus suspension was mixed occasionally during the incubation and then plated on to one or two wells of the Matrigel-coated wells with MEF cells and cultured overnight. 1 ml of the culture media was added to the cells on the next day and the virus particles were washed out 36 hours after the infection by medium change. G418 and Blasticidin selection of drug resistant hESC lines Four days after virus infection, hESCs were treated with either G418 (400 µg/ml) or Blasticidin (5 µg/ml) for 36 hours, rinsed twice with DPBS to remove drugs, and cultured for two to three days with daily medium change to permit recovery. Recovered cells were then treated with the same drug a second time and allowed to recover, as before, until colonies attained sufficient size and cell density for passage. FACS purification and cloning of hESCs Figure 3A To generate a single-cell suspension for FACS, hESCs were dispersed with Accutase (1×) for 10 to 15 minutes at room temperature and cells were collected by centrifugation at 200 rpm for 5 minutes and the medium was exchanged to regular culturing medium and kept at room temperature until use. The dissociated hESCs (adjusted to 106 cells/ml) were stained with SytoxGreen (Invitrogen) or 7-AAD (7-amino-actinomycin D, BD Bioscience) prior to sorting on a FACSVantage™. Cell debris, cell clumps, dead cells and MEFs were gated out before sorting. Dissociated hESCs were sorted in pre-warmed 100% KOSR and then diluted with pre-warmed culture media and seeded on top of the irradiated hESC feeder plates at 10,000 to 20,000 cells/well final concentration on Matrigel-coated 6-well dishes (Corning, Inc. catalogue 3506) with 20% and 40% of KOSR, respectively. Fresh medium was added occasionally but not exchanged until day 7 post-FACS and then exchanged every day thereafter. Single colonies were passaged onto irradiated MEFs in a well of a 24-well dish on day 18 after which they were expanded onto successively larger wells with each passage (Figure 3 hESC differentiation Figure 6A For neuronal differentiation, EBs were prepared as above but with aggregates of approximately 50 to 100 cells in neurogenic medium [DMEM/F12 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 0.1 mM NEAA, 1× N-2 supplement (Invitrogen, catalogue 17502), 1× B-27 supplement (Invitrogen, catalogue 17504), 25 µg/ml bFGF (Chemicon)] in place of cardiogenic EB medium. For endodermal differentiation, EBs were prepared as above but with aggregates of approximately 100 to 200 cells in endodermal EB medium [DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 20% FBS (Hyclone), 0.1 mM NEAA, 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol]. RT-PCR Total RNA was extracted using acid-guanidium-phenol-chloroform and cDNA was synthesized using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen) and amplified products measured by Syber Green incorporation on the LightCycler (Roche). The following primers were used: hAMHC_U5619, GAAGGGCATGAGGAAGAGTGA; hAMHC_L5901, GGTTATTCCTCGTCGTGCATC; hBMHC_U5242, AGAACACCAGCCTCATCAACC; hBMHC_L5639, CTGTCCTCCTCCGTCTGGTAG; hbACTIN_U, GAGCATCCCCCAAAGTTCACA; hbACTIN_L, GCAATGCTATCACCTCCCCTG; hPDX-1_U, CCGCAGGAACCACGATGAGA; hPDX-1_L, GCCACAAACAACGCCAATCC; hAFP_U, GTCGTTTTGTCTTCTCTTCC; hAFP_L, GCCACAAATAACAGAGGAAC. Oct-4, Nanog, Rex-1 and hTERT primers were as in [38]. Immunohistochemistry Cells were washed with warm PBS, fixed with ice-cold MeOH at −20°C for 7 minutes and then incubated with DPBS for 10 minutes at room temperature. Cells were blocked with 1%BSA/PBS for 1 hour and then incubated in primary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature. After three 10-minute washes with PBS, the secondary antibody solution was incubated for a period ranging from 40 minutes to overnight at 4°C and then washed three times with PBS prior to mounting with SlowFade mounting medium with DAPI (Invitrogen). Histological sections were sectioned in OCT at 8 µm and stained as above to quantify percentage of cardiomyocytes in CSs. Cardiac Troponin-I (Alomone Labs), MAP2 (Chemicon), CD31 (eBiosciences), and appropriate AlexaFluor488 (Invitrogen), Cy3 or Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch) secondary antibodies were used for immunostaining. Microscopy and DNA content determination For cell tracking and DNA content determination, differentiating hESCs were plated in 2 ml of appropriate differentiation medium for two days prior to recording onto 0.17-mm thick Delta T glass-bottom culture dishes (Biotechs, Butler, PA) that had been coated with 0.1% gelatin for 1 hr at room temperature. The dishes were then sealed with parafilm and mounted on the stage of an inverted Nikon microscope equipped with electronically controlled shutters, filter wheels, and a 14-bit cooled CCD camera (Orca II, Hamamatsu Corporation) controlled by MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices, USA). Time-lapse images were acquired for up to several days at a time. H2BmCherry, H2BeGFP and DAPI integrated fluorescence intensity was calculated and cell tracks were created using MetaMorph and a modified version of Particle Tracking Plugin for ImageJ [17]. Gene Expression Microarray Analysis Total RNA was extracted as described [26] for biological triplicates of Rex-Neor hESCs and Rex-Neor, αMHC-Puror day 40 CSs for microarray sample preparation. Total RNA with a concentration of ~1 µg, was treated with the RiboMinus human Transcriptome Isolation kit (Invitrogen) and used as input for the GeneChip® WT cDNA Synthesis and WT Terminal Labeling kits (Affymetrix), according to manufacturers instructions by the Gladstone Institutes Genomics Core. The resulting fragmented and labeled cDNA were hybridized to individual Human Exon 1.0 ST GeneChip arrays and scanned according to manufacturers' instructions. Affymetrix CEL files from these samples were combined with CEL files for the Cythera neuronal precursor differentiation datasets (Cy-ESCs and Cy-NPs), HUES6 cell line experiment (HUES6-ESCs and HUES6-NPs) and fetal human CNS stem cells (hCNS-SCs), provided by the Gage laboratory (http://www.snl.salk.edu/˜geneyeo/stuff/papers/supplementary/ES-NP) and 33 CEL files for 11 different adult human tissues obtained from the Affymetrix website (http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/sample_data/exon_array_data.affx). RMA [39] expression values and detection p-values were obtained for all probesets using the Affymetrix program, ExpressionConsole (http://www.affymetrix.com/products/software/specific/expression_console_software.affx). To calculate gene expression values from the exon array data, we developed a program in python called ExpressionBuilder. Expression builder aligns probeset genomic coordinates to Ensembl genes and exons along with probeset to transcript associations from the Affymetrix probeset annotation file (HuEx-1_0-st-v2.na23.hg18.probeset.csv) to identify probesets that are most common (constitutive) to all transcripts for an Ensembl gene. Constitutive gene expression values were determined from the mean of the probeset log2 intensity values of all constitutive probesets. If no constitutive probesets are present, gene expression is calculated by the mean of all gene linked probeset intensities. To determine differential expression, fold changes and T-test p-values were calculated from the log2 expression data for differentiated cell sample arrays compared to the appropriate undifferentiated hESC baseline (Rex-Neor H9, Cythera or HUES6 lines). Differentially expressed genes (absolute fold>2 and p<0.05) for day 40 CS samples compared to Rex-Neor hESCs were clustered along with differentially expressed genes (same criteria) in adult heart compared to Rex-Neor hESCs (no filtering) using the clustering method HOPACH (hierarchical ordered partitioning and collapsing hybrid) in R [40]. The resulting cluster data was visualized in the program TreeView [41]. Gene Ontololgy over-representation analysis and tree filtering were performed using the freely available software GO-Elite (http://www.genmapp.org/go_elite/go_elite.html). Downloadable Gene Expression Dataset The hESC and tissue derived gene expression data can be downloaded at http://conklinwolf.ucsf.edu/informatics/Mercola/DATASET-all-tissues_all-hESCs_all_diff-rma-exon.zip. For 3472 Ensembl gene identifiers, mean fold change and ttest p-values are provided along with log2 expression values for all in vitro and in vivo cell/tissue derived exon arrays. This data is accompanied by gene annotations including probesets for which the values are derived, associated Affymetrix transcript clusters and HOPACH cluster data (used in Figure 7 Intracellular recordings with sharp electrode technique CSs were plated on coverslips coated with 0.1% gelatin and the coverslips were mounted in a chamber on the stage of an inverted microscope (Olympus IX71) and superfused with extracellular DMEM containing 1.8 mM Ca2+. All experiments were conducted at 37°C and the extracellular DMEM was continuously pre-oxygenated with 95% O2/5% CO2. Sharp glass microelectrodes are fabricated with resistances of 50–200 MΩ when filled with 3 M KCl. The spontaneously beating CSs were then impaled with the microelectrodes and electrode capacitance was nullified. The intracellular recordings of APs were obtained using an AxoPatch 200B amplifier in current clamp mode and pCLAMP-10 software (Molecular Devices). Data were sampled at 10 kHz and low pass filtered at 5 kHz. The following parameters of APs with more than 10 seconds of stable baselines were measured: AP amplitude (APA), maximum diastolic potential (MDP), maximal upstroke velocity (Vmax), AP duration at 90% of the repolarization (APD90), and the cycle-length between two spontaneous APs (RR). The APD90 is corrected by heart rates with Bazett formula (APD/square root of RR). Single cell force measurements Contractile forces in individual cells were measured using a method of dynamic traction force microscopy [29]. Briefly, polyacrylamide gels with an elastic modulus of 4 kPa were polymerized using 4% acrylamide (BioRad), 0.2% bisacrylamide (BioRad), 5% fluorescent beads (Molecular Probes), 0.1% ammonium persulfate (Sigma) and 0.5% N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED, Biorad). These gels were bound to cover slips coated with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (Sigma) and 0.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma). Gels were coated with 0.5 mg/ml of rat tail type I collagen (Sigma) bound through the heterobifunctional crosslinker N-Sulfosuccinimidyl-6-[4′-azido-2′-nitrophenylamino] hexanoate (sulfo-SANPAH, Pierce). Contractile CSs were manually transferred to 0.1% gelatin-coated plates for 24 hours and then dispersed into single cells by incubating in 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Individual cardiomyocytes were resuspended in serum-containing media and plated onto collagen-coated polyacrylamide gels at a density of 20,500 cells per gel and allowed to attach to substrates overnight. Individual cells were stimulated at 0.5 Hz with 0.8 ms pulses of 50 V using a platinum electrode. Images of fluorescent beads at the gel surface were taken every 15 ms (Supplemental Movie S5). Bead displacements were tracked using a cross-correlation-based optical flow algorithm in order to map deformations across the face of the gel [42]. These displacements, along with the gel elastic modulus and Poisson Ratio were used to calculate a map of shear stress on the gel surface based on the Boussinesq solution of deformation in an infinite elastic half space [43]. These stresses, or traction forces, were integrated over the projected cell area to calculate force, which is then graphed versus time. Force vectors were projected along the major axis of contraction in order to calculate the reported axial force. Figure S1 Co-incident fluorescent reporter and myosin expression in EBs derived from engineered hESCs. Examples of differentiating EBs from αMHC-Puror_Rex-Neor, αMHC-mCherry_Rex-Blar, PGK-H2BeGFP hESC line created by G418 and Blasticidin selection. EBs were plated onto gelatin at day 6 of differentiation and processed for immunochemistry at day 10. Micrographs of two EBs imaged at 10× (E–H) and 20× (A–D) showing DAPI (A,E), mCherry (B,F) and MF20 immunostaining (C,G) and merged (D,H) fluorescence. mCherry and MF20 immunostaining fluorescence were coincident in Blasticidin-selected hESCs, reflecting efficacy of the co-selection strategy at removing non-functionally transduced cells. (9.04 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(8.6M, tif) Figure S2 Bead displacement and force generation by day 50 hESC-derived cardiomycytes. Individual hESC-derived cardiomyocytes were deposited onto gelatin functionalized surfaces of polyacrylamide gels incorporating fluorescent beads (see Methods). (A,B) Fluorescent micrographs of bead surface beneath a cardiomyocyte when relaxed (A) and contracted (B). Bead displacements were plotted as deformations or stresses, with displacement vectors as red arrows. Panels are individual frames from the stack shown as Supplemental Movie S5. White scale bars (10 µm) are for the image. Red scale bars (1 µm) represent the scale of the displacement arrows that are expanded 20-fold for visualization. (C) Example of a stress map across the face of the gel during contraction of the hESC-derived cardiomyocyte causing the displacement in (B). The scale bar represents 10 um and scale arrow represents 0.1 nN/µm2. (D) Sample plot of total force over time for hESC-derived cardiomyocyte (dashed) and control neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocyte (solid) showing similar force generation. (2.19 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(2.0M, tif) Figure S4 Schematic of T/Brachyury-eGFP_Rex-Neo. (0.45 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(443K, tif) Figure S5 Schematic of αMHC-mCherry_Rex-Blar. (0.28 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(274K, tif) Figure S6 Schematic of αMHC-eGFP_Rex-Neor. (0.45 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(442K, tif) Figure S7 Schematic of αMHC-Puror_Rex-Neor. (0.41 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(402K, tif) Figure S8 Schematic of αMHC-Puror_Rex-Blar. (0.41 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(396K, tif) Movie S1 Example of uniform PGK-H2BeGFP fluorescence in nuclei of cardiomyocytes derived from a FACS isolated hESC line. Automaticity is evident by spontaneous contractions. Inset shows phase contrast brightfield image. (1.15 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(1.1M, mov) Movie S2 Example of cell tracking using PGK-H2BmCherry hESCs. Time-lapse image stacks of PGK-H2BmCherry ESCs over 20 hours were acquired with a 10× objective (NA 0.5) at 10 minute intervals using MetaMorph. Centroids of H2BmCherry fluorescence were tracked automatically using a modified version of the Particle Tracking Plugin [17] for ImageJ (Methods). The 4 concatenated clips correspond to single tracks within the yellow boxes in Figure 2C (1.52 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(1.4M, mov) Movie S3 Example of cardiomyocytes labeled with αMHC-mCherry. The hESC line was engineered with αMHC-Puror_Rex-Neor and αMHC-mCherry_Rex-Blar vectors (Figure 1A (2.45 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(2.3M, mov) Movie S4 Example of cardiomyocyte spheroid uniformly labeled with αMHC-eGFP Example of a dual drug selected CS from a hESC line engineered with αMHC-Puror_Rex-Blar and αMHC-eGFP_Rex-Neor vectors (Methods). Phase contrast and eGFP fluorescence image stacks were acquired 3 days following Puromycin drug selection (corresponding to day 16 after EB formation, see Methods). (1.63 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(1.5M, mov) Movie S5 Bead displacements used to calculate axial force of individual cardiomyocytes. Bead displacements in gels were tracked using a cross-correlation-based optical flow algorithm in order to map deformations (Supplemental Figure S1B) and stresses (Supplemental Figure S1C) across the face of the gel corresponding to individual cardiomyocytes [42]. (1.36 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(1.2M, mov) Acknowledgments We thank Ed Monosov and Yoav Altman from the BIMR Microscopy and Cell Analysis Cores for expert consultation, Linda Ta and Chris Barker from the Gladstone Genomics Core for their help in microarray sample preparation and data extraction and Austin Griggs for help with image analysis. Footnotes Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Funding: This work was funded by grant support from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) (RC1-00132-1) and NIH (R37HL059502, R33HL088266) to MM; the Mather's Charitable Foundation to MM and JHP; an Early Career Development Award from American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Bechtel Trusts & Foundation Grant, and CIRM (RS1-00171-1) to H-S.V.C.; NIH (HG003053 and HL66621) to BRC; and NIH (5P01HL46345-12) to ADM and University of California Biotechnology, Research and Education Program (UCBREP) GREAT award (2006-016) to ADM and KW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. References 1. Olson EN, Schneider MD. Sizing up the heart: development redux in disease. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1937–1956. [PubMed] 2. Kehat I, Gepstein A, Spira A, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Gepstein L. High-resolution electrophysiological assessment of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: a novel in vitro model for the study of conduction. Circ Res. 2002;91:659–661. [PubMed] 3. Binah O, Dolnikov K, Sadan O, Shilkrut M, Zeevi-Levin N, et al. Functional and developmental properties of human embryonic stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes. J Electrocardiol. 2007;40:S192–196. [PubMed] 4. Liu J, Fu JD, Siu CW, Li RA. Functional sarcoplasmic reticulum for calcium handling of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: insights for driven maturation. Stem Cells. 2007;25:3038–3044. [PubMed] 5. Dolnikov K, Shilkrut M, Zeevi-Levin N, Gerecht-Nir S, Amit M, et al. Functional properties of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: intracellular Ca2+ handling and the role of sarcoplasmic reticulum in the contraction. Stem Cells. 2006;24:236–245. [PubMed] 6. Laflamme MA, Gold J, Xu C, Hassanipour M, Rosler E, et al. Formation of human myocardium in the rat heart from human embryonic stem cells. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:663–671. [PubMed] 7. Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1015–1024. [PubMed] 8. van Laake LW, Passier R, Doevendans PA, Mummery CL. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and cardiac repair in rodents. Circ Res. 2008;102:1008–1010. [PubMed] 9. Xu C, Police S, Rao N, Carpenter MK. Characterization and enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Circ Res. 2002;91:501–508. [PubMed] 10. Mummery CL, Ward D, Passier R. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes by coculture with endoderm in serum-free medium. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2007;Chapter 1:Unit 1F 2. [PubMed] 11. Huber I, Itzhaki I, Caspi O, Arbel G, Tzukerman M, et al. Identification and selection of cardiomyocytes during human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Faseb J. 2007;21:2551–2563. [PubMed] 12. Xu C, Police S, Hassanipour M, Gold JD. Cardiac bodies: a novel culture method for enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2006;15:631–639. [PubMed] 13. Muller M, Fleischmann BK, Selbert S, Ji GJ, Endl E, et al. Selection of ventricular-like cardiomyocytes from ES cells in vitro. Faseb J. 2000;14:2540–2548. [PubMed] 14. Klug MG, Soonpaa MH, Koh GY, Field LJ. Genetically selected cardiomyocytes from differentiating embronic stem cells form stable intracardiac grafts. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:216–224. [PubMed] 15. Anderson D, Self T, Mellor IR, Goh G, Hill SJ, et al. Transgenic enrichment of cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cells. Mol Ther. 2007;15:2027–2036. [PubMed] 16. Shen F, Hodgson L, Rabinovich A, Pertz O, Hahn K, et al. Functional proteometrics for cell migration. Cytometry A. 2006;69:563–572. [PubMed] 17. Sbalzarini IF, Koumoutsakos P. Feature point tracking and trajectory analysis for video imaging in cell biology. J Struct Biol. 2005;151:182–195. [PubMed] 18. Amit M, Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS, Chiu CP, Harris CP, et al. Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture. Dev Biol. 2000;227:271–278. [PubMed] 19. Watanabe K, Ueno M, Kamiya D, Nishiyama A, Matsumura M, et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:681–686. [PubMed] 20. Arnold SJ, Stappert J, Bauer A, Kispert A, Herrmann BG, et al. Brachyury is a target gene of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Mech Dev. 2000;91:249–258. [PubMed] 21. Clements D, Taylor HC, Herrmann BG, Stott D. Distinct regulatory control of the Brachyury gene in axial and non-axial mesoderm suggests separation of mesoderm lineages early in mouse gastrulation. Mech Dev. 1996;56:139–149. [PubMed] 22. Yamaguchi H, Niimi T, Kitagawa Y, Miki K. Brachyury (T) expression in embryonal carcinoma P19 cells resembles its expression in primitive streak and tail-bud but not that in notochord. Dev Growth Differ. 1999;41:253–264. [PubMed] 23. Yamaguchi TP, Takada S, Yoshikawa Y, Wu N, McMahon AP. T (Brachyury) is a direct target of Wnt3a during paraxial mesoderm specification. Genes Dev. 1999;13:3185–3190. [PubMed] 24. Hosler BA, Rogers MB, Kozak CA, Gudas LJ. An octamer motif contributes to the expression of the retinoic acid-regulated zinc finger gene Rex-1 (Zfp-42) in F9 teratocarcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:2919–2928. [PubMed] 25. Kim C, Talantova M, Wei K, Barcova M, Nelson B, et al. Extra-cardiac cells and the mechanistic switch of automaticity during differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. 2008. submitted. 26. Yeo GW, Xu X, Liang TY, Muotri AR, Carson CT, et al. Alternative splicing events identified in human embryonic stem cells and neural progenitors. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3:1951–1967. [PubMed] 27. Synnergren J, Akesson K, Dahlenborg K, Vidarsson H, Ameen C, et al. Molecular signature of cardiomyocyte clusters derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1831–1840. [PubMed] 28. Mummery C, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Doevendans P, Spijker R, van den Brink S, et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes: role of coculture with visceral endoderm-like cells. Circulation. 2003;107:2733–2740. [PubMed] 29. Jacot JG, McCulloch AD, Omens JH. Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Biophysical Journal in revision. 2008 30. Pertz O, Hahn KM. Designing biosensors for Rho family proteins–deciphering the dynamics of Rho family GTPase activation in living cells. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:1313–1318. [PubMed] 31. Bluhm WF, McCulloch AD, Lew WY. Active force in rabbit ventricular myocytes. J Biomech. 1995;28:1119–1122. [PubMed] 32. Narmoneva DA, Vukmirovic R, Davis ME, Kamm RD, Lee RT. Endothelial cells promote cardiac myocyte survival and spatial reorganization: implications for cardiac regeneration. Circulation. 2004;110:962–968. [PubMed] 33. Barcova M, Campa VM, Mercola M. Human embryonic stem cell cardiogenesis. In: Loring JF, Wesselschmidt RL, Schwartz PH, editors. Human stem cell manual: a laboratory guide. 1st ed. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2007. 34. Bajpai R, Lesperance J, Kim M, Terskikh AV. Efficient propagation of single cells Accutase-dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75:818–827. [PubMed] 35. Zufferey R, Dull T, Mandel RJ, Bukovsky A, Quiroz D, et al. Self-inactivating lentivirus vector for safe and efficient in vivo gene delivery. J Virol. 1998;72:9873–9880. [PubMed] 36. Subramaniam A, Jones WK, Gulick J, Wert S, Neumann J, et al. Tissue-specific regulation of the alpha-myosin heavy chain gene promoter in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:24613–24620. [PubMed] 37. Dull T, Zufferey R, Kelly M, Mandel RJ, Nguyen M, et al. A third-generation lentivirus vector with a conditional packaging system. J Virol. 1998;72:8463–8471. [PubMed] 38. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–872. [PubMed] 39. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, et al. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e15. [PubMed] 40. Salomonis N, Cotte N, Zambon AC, Pollard KS, Vranizan K, et al. Identifying genetic networks underlying myometrial transition to labor. Genome Biol. 2005;6:R12. [PubMed] 41. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14863–14868. [PubMed] 42. Marganski WA, Dembo M, Wang YL. Measurements of cell-generated deformations on flexible substrata using correlation-based optical flow. Methods Enzymol. 2003;361:197–211. [PubMed] 43. Dembo M, Wang YL. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys J. 1999;76:2307–2316. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Genes Dev. 2003 Aug 15; 17(16):1937-56.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Circ Res. 2002 Oct 18; 91(8):659-61.
[Circ Res. 2002]J Electrocardiol. 2007 Nov-Dec; 40(6 Suppl):S192-6.
[J Electrocardiol. 2007]Stem Cells. 2007 Dec; 25(12):3038-44.
[Stem Cells. 2007]Stem Cells. 2006 Feb; 24(2):236-45.
[Stem Cells. 2006]Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Sep; 25(9):1015-24.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2007]Circ Res. 2002 Sep 20; 91(6):501-8.
[Circ Res. 2002]Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2007 Jul; Chapter 1():Unit 1F.2.
[Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2007]FASEB J. 2007 Aug; 21(10):2551-63.
[FASEB J. 2007]Stem Cells Dev. 2006 Oct; 15(5):631-9.
[Stem Cells Dev. 2006]FASEB J. 2007 Aug; 21(10):2551-63.
[FASEB J. 2007]FASEB J. 2000 Dec; 14(15):2540-8.
[FASEB J. 2000]J Struct Biol. 2005 Aug; 151(2):182-95.
[J Struct Biol. 2005]Cytometry A. 2006 Jul; 69(7):563-72.
[Cytometry A. 2006]J Struct Biol. 2005 Aug; 151(2):182-95.
[J Struct Biol. 2005]Cytometry A. 2006 Jul; 69(7):563-72.
[Cytometry A. 2006]Dev Biol. 2000 Nov 15; 227(2):271-8.
[Dev Biol. 2000]Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jun; 25(6):681-6.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2007]Mech Dev. 2000 Mar 1; 91(1-2):249-58.
[Mech Dev. 2000]Mech Dev. 1996 May; 56(1-2):139-49.
[Mech Dev. 1996]Dev Growth Differ. 1999 Jun; 41(3):253-64.
[Dev Growth Differ. 1999]Genes Dev. 1999 Dec 15; 13(24):3185-90.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Mol Cell Biol. 1993 May; 13(5):2919-28.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1993]J Clin Invest. 1996 Jul 1; 98(1):216-24.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]Mol Ther. 2007 Nov; 15(11):2027-36.
[Mol Ther. 2007]PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Oct; 3(10):1951-67.
[PLoS Comput Biol. 2007]Stem Cells. 2008 Jul; 26(7):1831-40.
[Stem Cells. 2008]Circulation. 2003 Jun 3; 107(21):2733-40.
[Circulation. 2003]FASEB J. 2007 Aug; 21(10):2551-63.
[FASEB J. 2007]FASEB J. 2000 Dec; 14(15):2540-8.
[FASEB J. 2000]J Cell Sci. 2004 Mar 15; 117(Pt 8):1313-8.
[J Cell Sci. 2004]J Biomech. 1995 Sep; 28(9):1119-22.
[J Biomech. 1995]Circulation. 2004 Aug 24; 110(8):962-8.
[Circulation. 2004]Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 May; 75(5):818-27.
[Mol Reprod Dev. 2008]J Virol. 1998 Dec; 72(12):9873-80.
[J Virol. 1998]Mech Dev. 2000 Mar 1; 91(1-2):249-58.
[Mech Dev. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1991 Dec 25; 266(36):24613-20.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Mol Cell Biol. 1993 May; 13(5):2919-28.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1993]J Virol. 1998 Dec; 72(12):9873-80.
[J Virol. 1998]J Virol. 1998 Nov; 72(11):8463-71.
[J Virol. 1998]Cell. 2007 Nov 30; 131(5):861-72.
[Cell. 2007]J Struct Biol. 2005 Aug; 151(2):182-95.
[J Struct Biol. 2005]PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Oct; 3(10):1951-67.
[PLoS Comput Biol. 2007]Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Feb 15; 31(4):e15.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2003]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(2):R12.
[Genome Biol. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8; 95(25):14863-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Methods Enzymol. 2003; 361():197-211.
[Methods Enzymol. 2003]Biophys J. 1999 Apr; 76(4):2307-16.
[Biophys J. 1999]J Struct Biol. 2005 Aug; 151(2):182-95.
[J Struct Biol. 2005]Methods Enzymol. 2003; 361():197-211.
[Methods Enzymol. 2003]