![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Modulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α Activity by N-Acetyl Cysteine Attenuates Inhibition of Oligodendrocyte Development in Lipopolysaccharide Stimulated Mixed Glial Cultures Manjeet K. Paintlia, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Address Correspondence to: Avtar K. Singh, MD; Department of Pediatrics; 173 Ashley Avenue, 513-Darby Children’s Research Institute; Medical University of South Carolina; Charleston, SC 29425; Tel # (843) 792-7542; Fax # (843) 792-7130; Email: singhi/at/musc.edu #These authors contributed equally to this study. The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at J Neurochem.Abstract Glial cells secrete proinflammatory mediators in the brain in response to exogenous stimuli such as infection and injury. Previously, we documented that systemic maternal lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-exposure at E18 causes oligodendrocyte (OL)-injury/hypomyelination in the developing brain which can be attenuated by N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; precursor of glutathione). The present study delineates the underlying mechanism of NAC mediated attenuation of inhibition of OL development in LPS-stimulated mixed glial cultures. Factors released by LPS-stimulated mixed glial cultures inhibited the OL development as showed by decrease in both proliferation (BrdU+/NG2+) and differentiation (O4+ and MBP+) of OL-progenitors. Correspondingly, an impairment of peroxisomal proliferation was showed by decrease in the level of peroxisomal proteins in the developing OLs following exposure to LPS conditioned media (LCM). Both NAC and WY14643, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α agonist attenuated these LCM-induced effects in OL-progenitors. Similar to WY14643, NAC attenuated LCM-induced inhibition of PPAR-α activity in developing OLs. Studies conducted with cytokines and diamide (a thiol-depleting agent) confirmed that cytokines are active agents in LCM which may be responsible for inhibition of OL development via peroxisomal dysfunction and induction of oxidative-stress. These findings were further corroborated by similar treatment of developing OLs generated from PPAR-α (-/-) and wild-type mice or B12 oligodendroglial cells co-transfected with PPAR-α siRNAs/pTK-PPREx3-Luc plasmids. Collectively, these data provide evidence that the modulation of PPAR-α activity thus peroxisomal function by NAC attenuates LPS-induced glial factors mediated inhibition of OL development suggesting new therapeutic interventions to prevent the devastating effects of maternal infections. Keywords: Lipopolysaccharide, oligodendrocyte, cerebral white matter injury, reactive oxygen species, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and N-acetyl cysteine INTRODUCTION Maternal systemic infection and inflammation are two important factors involved in the development of cerebral white matter injury (hypomyelination) in premature infants (Dammann & Leviton 1997, Back & Rivkees 2004). Systemic inflammation subsequent to maternal systemic infection gives rise to the secretion of proinflammatory mediators which are toxic to the developing fetal brain (Bell et al. 2004). This is followed by activation of resident brain glial cells and the inhibition of the differentiation of oligodendrocyte (OL) progenitors into myelin-forming OLs (Back et al. 2002, Leviton & Gilles 1996) which contributes to neonatal brain injury and later developmental disability (Dammann & Leviton 2000). Damage to the developing OLs is the hallmark of cerebral white matter injury due to an increase in production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitrogen species, glutamate, cytokines, and adenosine in perinatal insults (Kinney & Back 1998). Maternal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at embryonic gestation day 18 (E18) and E19 induces an increase in expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in the maternal and fetal compartments, including the fetal brain (Wang et al. 2006, Cai et al. 2000). Clinical studies have established that higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the amniotic fluid observed during intrauterine infections are positively correlated with cerebral white matter injury (Yoon et al. 1997a, Hagberg et al. 2005). In line with this, immature OLs (premyelinating OLs) are reported to be more vulnerable to proinflammatory cytokines compared with myelin-forming OLs (Pang et al. 2005, Levison et al. 2001). Animal studies showed that the administration of LPS (ip) causes peroxisomal dysfunction (β-oxidation inhibition) in the liver (Khan et al. 2000). Peroxisomes are ubiquitous, metabolically active sub-cellular organelles responsible for metabolism of myelin lipids (i.e., plasmalogen, cholesterol, and very long chain fatty acids [VLCFAs]) (Lazarow 1995) as well as the detoxification of ROS (Lazarow 2003). Peroxisomal dysfunction due to impaired β-oxidation results in the accumulation of VLCFAs which is responsible for neuroinflammation and demyelination in the human X-adrenoleukodystrophy brain, a hereditary peroxisomal disorder (Paintlia et al. 2003). Peroxisomal dysfunction has been linked with ROS generation in apoptosis (Baumgart et al. 2001), aging (Lavrovsky et al. 2000), and ischemia/reperfusion injury (Deplanque et al. 2003, Schrader & Fahimi 2006) including pro-inflammatory disease processes (Poynter & Daynes 1998). Biogenesis of peroxisomes is regulated by PPAR-α in combination with the retinoic acid receptor by acting on PPREs present in the promoter region of most of the genes of peroxisomal proteins (Qi et al. 2000). PPAR-α binds to a diverse set of ligands, namely arachidonic acid metabolites (prostaglandins and leukotrienes) and synthetic fibrate drugs (Sher et al. 1993). These PPAR-α ligands induce peroxisomal proliferation in the cell (Sher et al. 1993). An increase in ROS generation and NF-κB activation has been shown to inhibit the expression of both acyl CoA oxidase (AOX) and PPAR-α, and thereby inhibit peroxisomal proliferation in skeletal muscle cells which contributes to cardiac hypertrophy (Cabrero et al. 2003, Cabrero et al. 2002). Since bacterial infection (LPS) induced inflammatory responses and ROS generation are involved in OL-injury/hypomyelination possibly mediated via peroxisomal dysfunction, we proposed to understand the role of LPS-induced effect on PPAR-α activity in developing OLs. The understanding of mechanisms involved in the increased vulnerability of developing OLs to various insults may be exploited for the development of strategies for neuroprotection against such insults. One of the popular therapeutic approaches for the inhibition of ROS-mediated injury is the use of glutathione-modulating agents such as NAC, a precursor of glutathione. NAC is likely one of the most widely investigated agents with both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Earlier, NAC has been shown to attenuate inflammation in various disease models such as ischemia-reperfusion injury in brain (Khan et al. 2004, Sekhon et al. 2003), lethal endotoximia (Victor et al. 2003), experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (Stanislaus et al. 2005), and hypoxia-ischemic brain injury in neonatal brains (Jatana et al. 2006). In addition, we and others have showed that NAC attenuates brain white mater injury in a systemic maternal infection model of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) (Cai et al. 2000, Paintlia et al. 2004). In this study, we showed that the modulation of PPAR-α activity by NAC attenuates the inhibition of OL development by factors secreted by LPS stimulated glial cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals & reagents LPS (Escherichia coli, serotype 055:B5), NAC, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. DMEM was purchased from Cellgro and FBS was purchased from GIBCO. Recombinant proteins of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-A), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and Thyroid hormone (TH) were purchased from R & D Systems. Rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and mouse anti-BrdU FITC conjugated antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Mouse and rabbit anti-NG2, -O4, -O1, -A2B5 (clone A2B5, 105), -integrin alphaM OX42 (microglia), and –anti-oligodendrocyte (clone NS-1; RIP) antibodies were purchased from Chemicon International. Anti-myelin basic protein (MBP clone 1; 129-138) was purchased from Serotec. Neutralizing anti-TNFR1 and –IL1R1 monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech, Inc. Polyclonal antibodies against PMP70 were purchased from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and polyclonal antibodies against acyl CoA: dihydroxyacetonephosphate-acyltransferase (DHAP-AT) were synthesized commercially as described earlier (Khan et al. 2005). Anti-peroxisome proliferator-proliferated receptor (PPAR)-α antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz. Goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with FITC or Texas Red antibodies were purchased from Vector Lab. Generation of mixed glial cultures, purification of OL progenitors, and treatments Mixed glial cultures were generated from brains of rats (SD; Charles River, Wilmington, MA), PPAR-α (-/-) and wild-type mice at PND 1–2 as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2005). B12 oligodendroglial cell line was kind gift from Dr. D. Schubert from the Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA. For purification of OL progenitors, mixed glial cultures were shaken for 30 min at 200 × g at 37 °C to remove microglia, followed by further shaking for 8 h to collect OL-progenitors. Then, supernatants containing OL-progenitors were centrifuged and plated in 100-mm plates after suspending them in fresh media. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C to remove remaining microglia and unattached OL-progenitors were transferred to new plates. Cultures were examined by FACS using specific markers for different cell types. Ninety-seven percent of OL-progenitors were A2B5+ containing approximately 3% of both OX42+ and GFAP+ cells. OL-progenitors were cultured in defined media i.e., DMEM containing 10% FBS and supplemented with growth factors (PDGF-A and bFGF; 10 ng/ml each) (Gregori et al. 2002), 24 h prior to treatment. Developing OLs were generated from OL-progenitors cultured initially for 96 h in defined media supplemented with 10 ng/ml of PDGF-A and TH each to enrich the O4+/GalC- population (Gregori et al. 2002) prior to treatment (confirmed by FACS analysis). Mixed glial cells were plated in 100-mm plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/ml. After 24 h, fresh DMEM without FBS was changed and cells were exposed to LPS (0.5 μg/ml) directly or after a 2-h pretreatment with NAC (10 mM). LPS-conditioned media (LCM) or NAC plus LPS-treated conditioned media (NLCM) were collected 48 h post-treatment. Likewise, conditioned media (CCM) from untreated mixed glial cells or those treated with NAC (10 mM, NCM) were collected after 48 h. For experimental studies, conditioned media were diluted with DMEM without FBS (50:50 v/v) to reduce the expected cell death of OL-progenitors by factors secreted by LPS stimulated glial cells. For proliferation studies, OL-progenitors (1 × 105 cells/ml) were plated on glass chamber slides (LAB TEK® II) and cultured in conditioned media generated from mixed glial cultures. For determination of peroxisomal protein levels, similarly treated OL-progenitors or developing OLs were double immunostained with anti-NG2/-PMP70, and anti-RIP/-PMP70 antibodies, respectively, 48 h post-treatment using standard protocols as described for immunocytochemistry. To determine the effect of NAC or WY14643 on the differentiation of OLs, developing OLs were treated with 20 μM of WY14643 (30 min) or 10 mM of NAC (2 h) prior to culturing in LCM or CCM. For mRNA expression analysis, OL progenitors or developing OLs were cultured in 100-mm plates and treated similar to that described above and harvested 48 h post-culturing. For nuclear translocation studies of PPAR-α, developing OLs were pretreated with 20 μM of WY14643 (30 min) and 10 mM of NAC (2 h) followed by culturing in CCM or LCM for 2 h. Immunocytochemistry Immunocytochemistry was performed using standard protocols. Double immunolabeling was performed by fixing cells in freshly prepared 10% (w/v) p-formaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4), 15 min at room temperature (RT). Then cells were incubated with primary antibodies i.e., anti-NG2 (1: 200), -MBP (1:200), -RIP (1:5,000) overnight at 4°C. Following incubation, cells were washed three times with PBS-Tween 20 (0.01%) and incubated with Texas Red conjugated secondary anti-mouse IgG (Vector Lab) antibodies for 1 h at RT. Then cells were fixed again and permeabilized by treating with Triton X-100 (0.1%) in PBS containing 2% (v/v) fetal calf serum for 15 min, washed three times with PBS and incubated with primary antibodies for PMP70 (1:200) or PPAR-α (1:200) for 2 h at RT followed by incubation with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG for 1 h at RT. Likewise, for BrdU double labeling, prestained cells with anti-NG2 antibodies were fixed and permeabilized as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2005). Then cells were treated with 2N HCl for 15 min at 37°C and then neutralized in sodium tetra-borate buffer (Sigma). Then cell were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-BrdU antibodies at 1:100 for 1 h at RT. Slides were also incubated with Texas Red or FITC-conjugated IgG without primary antibody as a negative control. After thorough washings with PBS, slides were mounted and examined under immunofluorescence microscopy (Olympus BX-60) with an Olympus digital camera (Optronics, Goleta, CA) using a dual band-pass filter as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2005). Counting of NG2+/brdU- and NG2+/BrdU+ cells was performed at 200× magnification, 5 fields/slide in duplicate in each set from three identical experiments and plotted after statistical analysis. The number and length of process of differentiating OLs was determined by using ImagePro plus4 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc. Bethesda, MD) and 10-15 cells were sampled/slide in three identical experiments. FACS analysis Cells (1 × 106) were washed twice and suspended in PBS containing 3% BSA followed by incubation with 10 μg/ml non-immune mouse IgG for 15 min. After washing, cells were incubated with 2 μg/ml of anti-O4 and –MBP antibodies diluted 1:100 in PBS containing 3% BSA at 4 °C for 30 min. After washing, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgM diluted at 1:200. Cells were washed before analysis and measured in a FL-1 channel (530 ± 15 nm band pass filter) on a FACS caliber flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) operating with Cell Quest™ software (Paintlia et al. 2006). Dead cells and debris were excluded from the analysis by gating live cells from size/structure density plots, with at least 10,000 events gated. RNA purification and quantitative real-time-PCR analysis Total RNA from brain tissues or cells was purified using TRIZOL reagent (Gibco BRL) as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2003). Single-stranded cDNA was synthesized from total RNA by using the superscript pre-amplification system for first-strand cDNA synthesis and performed quantitative real-time-PCR as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2003). The primer sets (IDT, Coralville, IA, USA) used was as follows: PMP-70 (Accession No. D90038): forward, 5’-acaccacgagtactacctgcacat-3’ and reverse, 5’-ccgaactcaactgtctcttctgtg-3’, DHAP-AT (Accession No. AF218826): forward, 5′-catcatcctcacagacaaaggg-3′ and reverse, 5′-cttcatgcaagaggcatttgga-3′, acyl CoA oxidase (AOX, Accession No. BC085743): forward, 5′-gaggtccatgaatcttaccaca-3′ and reverse, 5′-gtgagtagaggaagaagttttctgtg-3′, PPAR-α (Accession Nos. NM_013196): forward, 5′-tcgggatgtcacacaatgcaatcc-3′ and reverse, 5′-cgtgttcacaggtaaggatttctgcc-3′, MBP (Accession No. AF439750): forward, 5′-aatcggctcacaagggattcaagg-3′ and reverse, 5′-gctgtctcttcctcccagcttaaa-3′, GAPDH (Accession No. DQ403053): forward, 5′-cctacccccaatgtatccgttgtg-3′ and reverse, 5′-ggaggaatgggagttgctgttgaa-3′, and 18S rRNA: forward, 5’-ccagagcgaaagcatttgccaaga-3’ and reverse, 5’-tcggcatcgtttatggtcggaact-3’. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: activation of iTaq DNA polymerase (Bio-Rad) at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplification at 95 °C for 30 s and 55−60 °C for 1 min. The detection of threshold was set above the mean baseline fluorescence determined by the first 20 cycles. Amplification reactions in which the fluorescence increased above the threshold were defined as positive. In addition, a dissociation or temperature-melting curve was generated each time for confirmation of specific amplification. The quantity of target gene expression was normalized to the corresponding GAPDH mRNA quantity in respective test samples. Similar results were obtained when normalized with reference genes such as GAPDH or 18S rRNA. Plasmids and small interfering RNA (siRNA) oligonucleotides The source of peroxisome proliferator-response element (PPRE)-containing reporter plasmids, pTK-PPREx3-Luc used in the study are the same as previously described (Paintlia et al. 2006). A pool of three siRNAs duplexes for PPAR-α i.e., nucleotide 940: ggaugucacacaaugcaau, nucleotide 1535: gaaguucaaugccuuagaa and nucleotide 2725: cagcuccuuugauaugaua, and respective scramble siRNA (sequences were not disclosed by the company) including transfection reagent and media, were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. The protocol for transient co-transfection used in these studies was described in the product manual. Luciferase reporter assays Luciferase reporter assays were performed with a luciferase assay reagent kit (Roche) as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2006). The protein concentration was determined with the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA) and used to normalize luciferase enzyme activities in samples. Cytotoxicity assays Cytotoxicity was evaluated by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the culture medium with a commercially available kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Preparation of Nuclear Extracts Nuclear extracts of treated cells were prepared as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2006). In brief, cells were treated and washed with ice-cold PBS, and homogenized in 200 μl of buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9; 1 mM EDTA; 1 mM EGTA; 1 mM PMSF; 50 μg/ml leupeptin; 10 μg/ml aprotinin; 5 mM benzamidine; 1 mM sodium orthovandate; 2 mM NaF; and 1 mM DTT). After 10 min at 4 °C, Nonident P-40 was added to a final concentration of 0.5%. The tubes were vigorously vortexed for 10 s and the nuclei were collected by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 30 s. The supernatants were stored at −80 °C and the nuclear pellet was re-suspended by gentle shaking for 30 min at 4 °C in 100 μL of buffer A supplemented with 20% glycerol and 0.4 M NaCl. Nuclear proteins were obtained by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 5 min and the supernatants were stored at −80 °C. Protein concentration was quantified using Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA). Immunoblotting Western blotting of protein samples was carried out as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2005). Determination of PPARα transcription factor activity PPARα transcription factor activity in nuclear extracts of treated cells was determined by using ELISA based Cayman Chemical PPAR-α transcription factor assay kit (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, Michigan). 40- 50 μg of nuclear extract protein/sample was used for determination of PPARα activity using protocol described in the product manual and absorbance measured at 450 nm. VLC fatty acid analysis Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) from astrocytes or primary OL progenitors was prepared and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) as described earlier (Paintlia et al. 2005). Measurement of ROS ROS was determined using the membrane permeable dye 6-carboxy 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH2-DA) in serum-free medium as described earlier (Khan et al. 2005). Statistical analysis Using the Student’s unpaired t-test and ANOVA (Student-Newman-Keuls to compare all pairs of columns) p values were determined for the respective experiment from three identical experiments using GraphPad software (GraphPad Software Inc. San Diego, CA USA). The criterion for statistical significance was p<0.05. RESULTS Factors released by LPS stimulated glial cells block OL development via inhibition of peroxisomal proliferation which is reversed by NAC Because LPS-induced effects on developing OLs occur by activation of microglia and astrocytes (Cai et al. 2000, Lehnardt et al. 2002), we sought to investigate the effect of factors secreted by LPS stimulated glial cells on peroxisomes in developing OLs. For this, OL-progenitors were cultured in conditioned media i.e., LCM, NLCM, NCM and CCM. Conditioned media were diluted with FBS free DMEM (50:50 v/v) to study its effect on peroxisomes in OL-progenitors without induction of their cell death. OL-progenitors cultured in LCM showed a significant decrease in BrdU+/NG2+ cell population 24 h post-incubation compared to those cultured in CCM or NLCM (Fig. 1A and C
Corresponding with these findings, the message for peroxisomal proteins i.e., PMP70 (Fig. 2A
Inhibition of peroxisomal proliferation by LCM in developing OLs is via inhibition of PPAR-α trans-activation To further elucidate the underlying mechanism of LCM mediated inhibition of peroxisomal proliferation in developing OLs and its attenuation by NAC, we proposed to determine the status of PPAR-α (a transcription factor regulates the expression of peroxisomal proteins) activity in the developing OLs. For this, developing OLs were cultured in LCM after pretreatment with NAC or WY14643 (PPAR-α agonist). Interestingly, there was a corresponding decrease in the level of PMP70 (Fig. 3A
Double immunostaining revealed that LCM exposure causes the reduction of PPAR-α protein in the cytoplasm probably by its degradation and inhibits its nuclear translocation in the developing OLs, which was attenuated by WY14643 (Fig. 4A
LCM contains cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) which are responsible for ROS generation and peroxisomal dysfunction in developing Ols Because maternal LPS exposure induces IL-1β and TNF-α production in the fetal brain (Cai et al. 2000, Wang et al. 2006, Paintlia et al. 2004), we next investigated the effect of these cytokines on peroxisomes in developing OLs and astrocytes. Developing OLs or astrocytes were treated separately with a cocktail of cytokines (Cyt-Mix: IL-1β and TNF-α; 10 ng/ml each) in the presence/absence of NAC. Interestingly, Cyt-Mix treatment caused the accumulation of VLCFAs (C26:0/C22:0 ratio) as an indicator of peroxisomal dysfunction in the developing OLs when compared with controls, and this was reversed by NAC pretreatment (Fig. 5A
Depletion of GSH inhibits peroxisomal proliferation in developing Ols Previously, we documented that NAC pretreatment normalizes reduced-GSH in either diamide- (a thiol-depleting agent) or cytokine treated primary OLs (Singh et al. 1998). Cytokine-induced depletion of reduced-GSH in OLs is mediated via degradation of sphingomyelin into ceramide (Singh et al. 1998). Therefore, we next investigated whether the depletion of reduced-GSH has an impact in the inhibition of peroxisomal proliferation/function in the developing OLs. Transcripts for both peroxisomal proteins i.e., DHAP-AT (Fig. 6A
NAC-induced protective effect was diminished in LCM-exposed developing OLs lacking PPAR-α or B12 oligodendroglial cells co-transfected with PPAR-α siRNAs and pTK-PPREx3-Luc To further gain insight into the mechanism of NAC-induced protection in developing OLs via modulation of PPAR-α activity, we evaluated the protection of developing OLs lacking PPAR-α generated from PPAR-α (-/-) mice or B12 OLs co-transfected with PPAR-α siRNA and pTK-PPREx3-Luc (reporter plasmids) under similar conditions. LCM exposed wild-type developing OLs showed a significant decrease in MBP+ OL population compared to those exposed to CCM and that was attenuated by both NAC or WY14643 pretreatment (Fig. 7A
DISCUSSION Maternal LPS exposure has been shown to stimulate the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines i.e., TNF-α, IL-1α and IL-6 as detected in the maternal serum and amniotic fluid of pregnant mice (Fidel et al. 1994), mimicking maternal infection (Yoon et al. 1997b). Results presented here delineate the underlying mechanism of NAC mediated attenuation of LPS-induced inhibition of OL development during prenatal maternal infections which is responsible for cerebral white matter injury in premature infants. Factors secreted by LPS stimulated glial cells inhibited the proliferation of OL-progenitors and disturbed their differentiation into myelin-forming OLs. Correspondingly, the level of peroxisomal proteins such as PMP70 and AOX was reduced in developing OLs when exposed to LPS conditioned media generated from mixed glial cultures. NAC and WY14643 attenuated these LPS-induced effects on developing OLs in mixed glial cultures thus suggested the involvement of peroxisomes in OL development. Similar to WY14643, NAC modulated PPAR-α activity in the developing OLs. TNF-α and IL-1β are found to be active agents in the LPS conditioned media generated from mixed glial cultures, responsible for reduced-GSH depletion and ROS generation in the developing OLs. Furthermore, studies with OL-progenitors generated from PPAR-α (-/-)/wild-type mice and B12 oligodendroglial cells co-transfected with anti-PPAR-α SiRNA and PPRE-Luc plasmids confirmed our findings. It suggested that NAC modulates PPAR-α activity and peroxisomal functions in the developing OLs which are crucial for their development. Together, these findings provide evidence that NAC modulates PPAR-α activity/peroxisomal function in developing OLs against factors secreted byLPS stimulation of glial cells. Several lines of evidence suggest that free radical injury to the developing OLs underlies (at least in part) the pathogenesis of cerebral white matter injury (hypomyelination) observed in periventricular leukomalacia long-term survivors of preterm labor (Haynes et al. 2005). In human cerebral palsy patients, the presence of free radical brain injury is supported by the existence of both oxidative and nitrative stress markers of lipid peroxidation and nitrosylation/nitration, respectively (Haynes et al. 2003). LPS has been shown to cause the depletion of intracellular GSH and an increase in malondialdehyde, a byproduct of lipid peroxidation (Topal et al. 2004, Millan-Plano et al. 2003). This LPS-induced oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation leads to production of potentially toxic aldehydes such as 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) in the cell (Siems et al. 1992). 4-HNE has been reported to cause cellular damage mainly by modification of intracellular proteins (Uchida 2003, Toyokuni et al. 1994, Uchida & Stadtman 1993) and induction of inflammatory mediator expression such as COX-2, especially in macrophages (Kumagai et al. 2004). LPS-induced maternal proinflammatory cytokines or LPS itself can activate microglia in the fetal brain (Haynes et al. 2005). Therefore, activation of microglia in the fetal brain triggers events associated with reactive astrogliosis which disturbs the maturation of myelin-forming OLs, and thus hypomyelination in the postnatal brain. NAC replenishes the level of reduced-GSH thereby provides protection by quenching ROS in the glial cells following LPS exposure. In addition, anti-inflammatory effects of NAC are attributed to the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression/release (Tsuji et al. 1999), and activation of glial cells (Moynagh et al. 1994). Antioxidants have been shown to attenuate the generation of ROS and their cytotoxic effects on neurons in vivo (Bahat-Stroomza et al. 2005). Peroxisomal dysfunction has been shown to contribute partly to the generation of oxidative stress in the cell. Defects in the targeting of catalase to peroxisomes or pharmacologic inhibition of catalase activity has been shown to promote generation of ROS and activation of NF-κB in cells (Sheikh et al. 1998, Singh 1997). In contrast, treatment of these cells with antioxidants normalizes the metabolic function of peroxisomes and stems oxidative stress (Bahat-Stroomza et al. 2005). Defects in peroxisomal functioning can exacerbate demyelination in the brain, resulting in neurological deficits in animals (Elias et al. 1998, Khan et al. 2005, Paintlia et al. 2003). Recent study revealed that peroxisomal function in OLs are vital for brain integrity and their specific loss in OLs causes axonal loss followed by demyelination and neuroinflammation in adult mice brain (Kassmann et al. 2007). Likewise, neuroinflammation has been shown to cause peroxisomal dysfunction and demyelination in an acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model (Singh et al. 2004). So far peroxisomal dysfunction has been shown to be associated with several inherited metabolic diseases due to the deficiency of one or more peroxisomal proteins, and these defects are responsible for about 18 different fatal neurological disorders (Moser 1996, Moser 1999). In addition, animal studies revealed that inhibition of VLCFAs β-oxidation by thioridazine affects the rate of myelination in the developing brain (Van den Branden et al. 1989, Van den Branden et al. 1990). Our findings suggest that LPS-induced oxidative stress, in part, is contributed by peroxisomal dysfunction which increases the vulnerability of the developing OLs to targeted injury, perhaps due to their high lipid environment and decrease in synthesis of plasmalogen. In addition, decrease GSH peroxidase and release of iron also reported to increase the vulnerability of OLs to oxidative-stress (Juurlink et al. 1998). On the other hand, LPS-induced oxidative stress causes the activation of microglia and astrocytes, albeit peroxisomal functioning remains normal, likely due to the availability of strong endogenous antioxidant systems in these glial cells (Min et al. 2006). Major function of peroxisomes in the myelin-forming OLs is the metabolism of ROS and myelin lipids (Paintlia et al. 2003, Sztriha et al. 1997). The metabolism of ROS (H2O2) is vital for the survival of OLs against catastrophic effects of hypotension/hypoxia and/or neuroinflammation. In addition, peroxisomes support myelin biogenesis which is important for the differentiation of myelin-forming OLs (Sztriha et al. 1997). An increase in ROS generation and NF-κB activation has been shown to inhibit the expression of both AOX and PPAR-α which in turn inhibit peroxisomal proliferation in skeletal muscle cells resulting in cardiac hypertrophy (Cabrero et al. 2003, Cabrero et al. 2002). In agreement with these data, cytokine exposure causes peroxisomal dysfunction and ROS generation in the developing OLs, but not in astrocytes, which was attenuated by both NAC and WY14643. It suggests that factors secreted by LPS stimulated glial cells, inhibit peroxisomal function and enhance ROS generation via inhibition of PPAR-α activity in the developing OLs. In support of these data, WY14643 has been shown to protect hippocampal neurons against β-amyloid peptide-induced ROS generation in Alzheimer’s disease via peroxisomal proliferation (Santos et al. 2005). In addition, fibrates are shown to exert their anti-inflammatory effects by antagonizing NF-κB activity in aortic smooth muscle cells (Deplanque et al. 2003). Anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-4 has been documented to inhibit the activation of NF-κB in glial cells via trans-activation of PPAR-γ (Paintlia et al. 2006). This increase in activation of PPAR-γ by IL-4 is mediated via increase in synthesis of natural PPAR-γ ligand via modulation of 12/15 lipoxygenase activity in glial cells. In light of this, an observed decrease in PPAR-α activity and its nuclear translocation in the developing OLs when cultured in LPS-conditioned media and its reversal by NAC similar to WY14643 treatment suggesting that NAC likely increases the availability of endogenous ligands for PPAR-α in developing OLs. Secretary phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) has been shown to produce lipid mediators such as free fatty acids and prostaglandins that are endogenous ligands for PPAR-α (Corton et al. 2000). TNF-α induces an increase in sPLA2 activity and PPAR-α activation in mesangial cells via an autocrine mechanism (Beck et al. 2003). We hypothesize perhaps NAC-induced generation of a reducing environment increases the availability of endogenous PPAR-α ligands synthesized by sPLA2 in the developing OLs when exposed to LPS conditioned media generated from mixed glial cultures. However, more detailed investigations are required in this regard. In summary, this study delineates the underlying mechanism of LPS-induced inflammation mediated inhibition of OL development in brain glial cells (microglia/astrocytes). The impaired peroxisomal proliferation/function in the developing OLs via down regulation of PPAR-α activity (Figure 8
Acknowledgments We thank all members of our laboratory for their valuable comments and help during the course of this study. We thank especially Dr. Jennifer G. Schnellmann for critical reading of this manuscript and Ms. Joyce Brian for her technical assistance. This study was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health: NS-22576, NS-34741, NS-37766, NS-40810, C06 RR018823, and C06 RR015455. Abbreviations Contributor Information Manjeet K. Paintlia, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Ajaib S. Paintlia, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Mushfiquddin Khan, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Inderjit Singh, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Avtar K. Singh, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pediatr Res. 1997 Jul; 42(1):1-8.
[Pediatr Res. 1997]Semin Perinatol. 2004 Dec; 28(6):405-14.
[Semin Perinatol. 2004]Pediatr Res. 2004 Oct; 56(4):541-6.
[Pediatr Res. 2004]J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 15; 22(2):455-63.
[J Neurosci. 2002]Pediatr Neurol. 1996 Sep; 15(2):127-36.
[Pediatr Neurol. 1996]J Endotoxin Res. 2000; 6(1):41-50.
[J Endotoxin Res. 2000]J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1995 Sep; 54(5):720-5.
[J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1995]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003 Aug; 15(4):489-97.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003]Neurobiol Dis. 2003 Dec; 14(3):425-39.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2003]Am J Pathol. 2001 Oct; 159(4):1477-94.
[Am J Pathol. 2001]J Neurosci Res. 2004 May 15; 76(4):519-27.
[J Neurosci Res. 2004]Brain Res. 2003 May 2; 971(1):1-8.
[Brain Res. 2003]Free Radic Res. 2003 Sep; 37(9):919-29.
[Free Radic Res. 2003]J Autoimmune Dis. 2005 May 3; 2(1):4.
[J Autoimmune Dis. 2005]Pediatr Res. 2006 May; 59(5):684-9.
[Pediatr Res. 2006]J Neurosci Res. 2005 Jun 15; 80(6):845-54.
[J Neurosci Res. 2005]FASEB J. 2005 Sep; 19(11):1407-21.
[FASEB J. 2005]J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1; 22(1):248-56.
[J Neurosci. 2002]FASEB J. 2005 Sep; 19(11):1407-21.
[FASEB J. 2005]J Immunol. 2006 Apr 1; 176(7):4385-98.
[J Immunol. 2006]Neurobiol Dis. 2003 Dec; 14(3):425-39.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2003]J Immunol. 2006 Apr 1; 176(7):4385-98.
[J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2006 Apr 1; 176(7):4385-98.
[J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2006 Apr 1; 176(7):4385-98.
[J Immunol. 2006]FASEB J. 2005 Sep; 19(11):1407-21.
[FASEB J. 2005]FASEB J. 2005 Sep; 19(11):1407-21.
[FASEB J. 2005]J Neurosci Res. 2005 Jun 15; 80(6):845-54.
[J Neurosci Res. 2005]Pediatr Res. 2000 Jan; 47(1):64-72.
[Pediatr Res. 2000]J Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1; 22(7):2478-86.
[J Neurosci. 2002]Pediatr Res. 2000 Jan; 47(1):64-72.
[Pediatr Res. 2000]Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Oct; 11(5):343-53.
[Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006]J Neurosci Res. 2004 Nov 1; 78(3):347-61.
[J Neurosci Res. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1998 Aug 7; 273(32):20354-62.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 1):1467-75.
[Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994]Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug; 177(2):406-11.
[Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997]Brain Pathol. 2005 Jul; 15(3):225-33.
[Brain Pathol. 2005]J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003 May; 62(5):441-50.
[J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003]Life Sci. 2004 Jun 11; 75(4):461-7.
[Life Sci. 2004]J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2003; 17(1):39-44.
[J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2003]EXS. 1992; 62():124-35.
[EXS. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17; 95(6):2961-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Mol Cell Biochem. 1997 Feb; 167(1-2):1-29.
[Mol Cell Biochem. 1997]Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Feb; 21(3):637-46.
[Eur J Neurosci. 2005]Am J Med Genet. 1998 Nov 16; 80(3):223-6.
[Am J Med Genet. 1998]J Neurosci Res. 2005 Jun 15; 80(6):845-54.
[J Neurosci Res. 2005]Neurobiol Dis. 2003 Dec; 14(3):425-39.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2003]Pediatr Neurol. 1997 Apr; 16(3):232-6.
[Pediatr Neurol. 1997]J Lipid Res. 2003 Feb; 44(2):388-98.
[J Lipid Res. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2002 Mar 22; 277(12):10100-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2005 Dec 9; 280(49):41057-68.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 8; 278(32):29799-812.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000; 40():491-518.
[Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000]