• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of canjgastroThe Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology HomepageSubscription PageSubmissions Pagewww.pulsus.comThe Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Can J Gastroenterol. Feb 2008; 22(2): 133–137.
PMCID: PMC2659131

Language: English | French

Barriers to hepatitis C virus treatment in a Canadian HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfection tertiary care clinic

Meaghan McLaren, MD, Gary Garber, MD FRCPC, and Curtis Cooper, MD FRCPC

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Despite demonstrated efficacy in HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, not all patients initiate, complete or achieve success with HCV antiviral therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

All HIV-HCV coinfected patient consults received at The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Clinic (Ottawa, Ontario) between June 2000 and September 2006 were identified using a clinical database. A descriptive analysis of primary and contributing factors accounting for why patients did not initiate HCV therapy, as well as the therapeutic outcomes of treated patients, was conducted.

RESULTS:

One hundred two consults were received. Sixty-seven per cent of patients did not initiate HCV therapy. The key primary reasons included: HIV therapy was more urgently needed (22%), loss to follow-up (12%), patients were deemed unlikely to progress to advanced liver disease (18%) and patient refusal (12%). Many patients had secondary factors contributing to the decision not to treat, including substance abuse (23%) and psychiatric illness (14%). Overall, 59% of untreated patients (40 of 68) were eventually lost to follow-up. Thirty-three per cent of referred patients started HCV therapy. Twenty-seven of 42 courses (64%) were interrupted prematurely for reasons such as virological nonresponse (48%), psychiatric complications (10%) and physical side effects (7%). Of all treatment recipients, 12 of 42 full courses of therapy were completed and three remained on HCV medication. Overall, eight of the 102 coinfected patients studied (8%) achieved a sustained virological response.

DISCUSSION:

Not all HIV-HCV coinfected patients who are deemed to be in need of HCV treatment are initiating therapy. Only a minority of patients who do receive treatment achieve success. Implementation of HIV treatment, patient retention, attention to substance abuse and mental health care should be the focus of efforts designed to increase HCV treatment uptake and success. This can be best achieved within a multidisciplinary model of health care delivery.

Keywords: Antiviral therapy, HCV, HIV, Liver

Résumé

HISTORIQUE :

Malgré son efficacité démontrée en cas de co-infection par le VIH et le virus de l’hépatite C (VHC), les patients n’entreprennent et ne terminent pas tous l’antivirothérapie du VHC et ils n’en obtiennent pas tous des résultats.

PATIENTS ET MÉTHODOLOGIE :

Les auteurs ont repéré toutes les consultations de patients co-infectés par le VIH et le VHC ayant eu lieu à la clinique d’hépatite virale de l’Hôpital d’Ottawa (Ottawa, Ontario) entre juin 2000 et septembre 2006, au moyen d’une base de données cliniques. Ils ont procédé à une analyse descriptive des facteurs primaires et contributifs déterminant les raisons pour lesquelles des patients n’ont pas entrepris la thérapie contre le VHC, de même que les issues thérapeutiques des patients traités.

RÉSULTATS :

Cent deux consultations ont eu lieu. Soixante-sept pour cent des patients n’ont pas entrepris la thérapie contre le VHC. Les principales raisons s’établissaient comme suit : la thérapie contre le VIH était plus urgente (22 %), perte au suivi (12 %), l’état des patients était réputé peu susceptible de se détériorer vers une maladie hépatique avancée (18 %) et refus des patients (12 %). De nombreux patients présentaient des facteurs secondaires contribuant à la décision de ne pas traiter, y compris l’abus de drogues ou d’alcool (23 %) et les maladies psychiatriques (14 %). Dans l’ensemble, 59 % des patients non traités (40 des 68) ont fini par être perdus au suivi. Trente-trois pour cent des patients aiguillés ont entrepris la thérapie contre le VHC. Vingt-sept de ces 42 thérapies (64 %) ont pris fin prématurément pour des raisons comme une non-réponse virologique (48 %), des complications psychiatriques (10 %) et des effets secondaires physiques (7 %). Chez tous les receveurs d’un traitement, 12 des 42 thérapies ont été menées jusqu’au bout, et trois patients ont continué de prendre des médicaments contre le VHC. En tout, huit des 102 patients co-infectés à l’étude (8 %) ont obtenu une réponse virologique soutenue.

DISCUSSION :

Les patients co-infectés par le VIH et le VHC réputés avoir besoin d’un traitement contre le VHC n’entreprennent pas tous une thérapie. Seule une minorité des patients traités ont des résultats probants. L’implantation du traitement contre le VIH, la rétention des patients, l’attention aux soins de l’abus de drogues et d’alcool et des problèmes de santé mentale doivent être au centre des efforts visant à accroître la mise en œuvre et la réussite du traitement contre le VHC. On y parviendra mieux au sein d’un modèle multidisciplinaire de prestation des soins.

As a result of common risk factors for exposure, HIV and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are often found concurrently. Approximately 20% of HIV seropositive Canadians are HCV coinfected (13). Liver disease has emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-HCV coinfected patients. HIV negatively impacts HCV-induced liver disease, resulting in accelerated progression to cirrhosis, liver failure and liver-specific death (48).

Although the likelihood of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) is diminished in patients with HIV-HCV coinfection (9,10), successful clearance of chronic HCV infection with antiviral therapy reduces liver fibrosis and inflammation, which presumably prevents cirrhosis, liver failure and liver-specific death. The risk of antiretroviral-related hepatotoxicity may also be reduced (11). Despite these potential benefits, many patients do not initiate or complete HCV antiviral therapy and, consequently, do not clear their HCV infection. In the present paper, we describe medical, social and psychological reasons why HIV-HCV coinfected patients are not initiating HCV antiviral therapy despite their referral to a Canadian tertiary care centre dedicated to HCV care provision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all HIV-HCV coinfected patients referred to The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Clinic (Ottawa, Ontario) between June 2000 and September 2006. The program offers clinical care by infectious diseases specialists and nurses who are knowledgeable in the management of HIV and HCV. Hepatology and psychiatric assessment are available by referral. Access to social work and psychologists is very limited. Patients were identified using a computerized clinical database (SPSS Version 13.0, SPSS Inc, USA). A supplemental chart review was performed to gather information on patient characteristics, attendance records, baseline HIV RNA level and CD4 count, and antiretroviral use, as well as to identify the primary and contributing factors responsible for patient failure to initiate HCV antiviral treatment. The collection and analysis of clinical data from consenting patients managed at The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Clinic were reviewed and approved by The Ottawa Hospital Research Ethics Board. Informed consent was obtained for participation in the database at the patient’s first visit to the clinic. Participation rates exceed 99%.

A descriptive analysis was performed to tabulate the primary and contributing factors accounting for why patients did not initiate HCV therapy. Those who did commence therapy were analyzed for their therapeutic outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred six consultations for HIV-HCV coinfection assessment were seen at The Ottawa General Hospital Viral Hepatitis Clinic between June 2000 and September 2006. Four patients were HCV antibody-positive but RNA-negative, and as such, were excluded from the analysis. The remaining 102 HIV-HCV coinfected patients were evaluated in detail (Figure 1).

Figure 1)
Flow chart describing the evaluation of 106 HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected patients who were seen at The Ottawa General Hospital Viral Hepatitis Clinic (Ottawa, Ontario)

The cohort was predominantly male (87%) and Caucasian (95%) (Table 1). The mean age was 43 years. Seventy per cent of referred patients reported a history of injection drug use, 41% had a history of tattooing and 61% reported a history of excessive alcohol consumption. Baseline characteristics were similar between treated and untreated groups for most key parameters. Treated HCV patients did have better control of their HIV disease, with greater HIV RNA suppression (HIV RNA level below 50 copies/mL) and higher mean CD4 cell count. They also had lower rates of injection drug use and incarceration.

TABLE 1
Characteristics of 102 HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected patients on their first visit to The Ottawa General Hospital Viral Hepatitis Clinic (Ottawa, Ontario)

Sixty-eight patients (67%) did not initiate HCV therapy. The key primary reasons for not initiating HCV therapy are reported in Figure 1 and Table 2. HIV therapy was deemed to be more urgently required than HCV treatment in 22% of referrals. Nineteen per cent never came to the clinic or were lost to follow-up before completion of their initial workup. Eighteen per cent were deemed unlikely to progress to advanced liver disease based on their clinical evaluation, liver studies and estimated rate of fibrosis progression calculated from liver biopsy results. These patients were advised not to commence HCV treatment but were asked to follow up in the clinic every six to 12 months. Twelve per cent of patients (n=8) declined treatment for HCV despite recommendations to the contrary. Most cited treatment side effect concerns. Therapy was not initiated in 14% of patients as a consequence of substance abuse issues, and in 7% because of psychiatric illnesses including needle phobia, depression, bipolar condition and anxiety. Other concurrent factors that were not identified as the key reason for not starting HCV therapy, but nevertheless contributed to this decision, were identified. These factors related predominantly to substance abuse (23%) and psychiatric illness (14%) (Figure 1).

TABLE 2
Primary reasons why patients did not initiate hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy (n=68)

A portion of patients who did not initiate therapy (27 of 68 [40%]), but who were advised to be followed serially over the long term, were also eventually lost to follow-up. Overall, 59% of untreated patients (40 of 68) were lost to follow-up during this period of evaluation.

Five of the coinfected patients who did not receive treatment for their HCV (7%) died. Causes of death included untreated HCV due to concomitant untreated psychiatric disorder and subsequent liver failure, death in the hospital with an admission diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis and untreated HIV, septic shock in a patient with controlled HIV (CD4 level 323 cells/μL, viral load less than 50 copies/mL) and unknown (n=2). The outcomes of untreated patients lost to follow-up are not known.

Thirty-four of the original 102 HIV-HCV coinfected patients (33%) received 42 courses of HCV therapy (Table 1). Treatment initiation years were as follows: 2000 (n=2), 2001 (n=6), 2002 (n=5), 2003 (n=8), 2004 (n=6), 2005 (n=3) and 2006 (n=4). Regimens consisted of ribavirin plus interferon-alpha-2B (n=14), pegylated interferon-alpha-2B (n=23) or pegylated interferon-alpha-2A (n=4). Twenty-seven courses of therapy (64%) were interrupted prematurely for reasons including virological nonresponse, defined as failure to achieve a 2log10 reduction at week 12 or detectable HCV viremia at week 24 (n=20); psychiatrical complications (n=4); and physical side effects (n=3). Of the 34 patients who received therapy, 12 completed full courses and three were being treated at the time of analysis. Eight of these 34 patients achieved a SVR, which represents 24% of those starting therapy and only 8% of the original 102 referrals. Three of 24 patients (13%) with genotype 1/4 and five of eight patients (63%) with genotype 2/3 achieved a SVR.

DISCUSSION

Despite effective HCV treatment and access to a dedicated viral hepatitis clinic based within a Canadian tertiary care centre, two-thirds of referred HCV-HIV coinfected patients did not initiate therapy. Only a few patients were ineligible for treatment based on nonmodifiable criteria, including comorbid medical contraindications, end-stage liver disease and advanced HIV disease. Many patients were identified as having multiple concurrent barriers to treatment, including substance abuse, psychiatric illness, anxiety related to workup or treatment, and poor social circumstances. These are challenging obstacles but they can be overcome.

Several studies have demonstrated comparably low rates of treatment uptake in the setting of HIV-HCV coinfection (1217). The barriers to treatment were remarkably similar. In an urban American cohort (18), two-thirds of HIV-HCV patients were ineligible for HCV treatment by virtue of nonadherence to medical visits (23%), active psychiatric disease (21%), ongoing drug or alcohol abuse (23%), decompensated liver disease (12%), advanced HIV disease (13%) and other medical comorbidities (8%). In another American study (19), only 15% of eligible coinfected patients initiated HCV therapy. Reasons included noncompliance (40%), alcohol and injection drug use (15%), decompensated cirrhosis (13%), psychiatric diseases (8%) and comorbid diseases (24%). In a prospective American-based analysis (20), only 12% of patients were free of contraindications to HCV treatment. Alcohol use was the most frequently identified contraindication, but most patients had multiple barriers, including depressive symptoms, injection drug use, poorly controlled HIV and decompensated liver disease. Canadian physicians based at the Northern Alberta HIV Program at the University of Alberta (Edmonton, Alberta) deemed 85% of their coinfected patients to be ineligible for HCV treatment (21). Contraindications included nonadherence or nonattendance (50%), unstable or chaotic lifestyle (46%), active injection drug use (26%), psychiatric comorbidity (18%), low CD4 counts (15%), minimal liver disease based on enzymes (15%) or biopsy (6%), and advanced liver disease (3%).

Our analysis, and that of others, demonstrates that coinfection treatment requires expertise in the management of mental illness, addictions, poverty and patient retention. Like most Canadian HCV clinics, our program has very limited access to these services and is, in our opinion, a major reason why so few of our HIV-HCV coinfected patients ended up on HCV treatment. To achieve success with currently available therapies, a multidisciplinary clinical care model is well suited to enable the coordination of primary health care with specialty HIV and HCV care, alongside integrated support from addiction medicine, mental health and social work. The holistic focus should be on providing ongoing support to engage and retain coinfected patients with complex social and medical health care needs. Multidisciplinary models for the treatment of HIV have been proven to be successful (22). These models should be applied to HCV and coinfected patients.

Several studies have shown the potential effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach to HIV-HCV care (23,24). In one study (23), HCV care was transferred from a liver clinic to a HIV primary care program. Key features of this program included the establishment of a coinfection clinic within the HIV clinic, assignment of a full-time nurse to monitor and support patients, and creation of a coinfection patient peer group. As a result, appointment attendance improved from less than 10% of referred patients to more than 70%. At another American urban centre, a coinfection clinic – consisting of a physician who specialized in HIV and HCV, a hepatologist, a coinfection nurse, a clinical coordinator, psychiatric care, counselling, coinfection group therapy, addiction treatment and home care – was established. Patients received directly administered interferon in conjunction with concurrent mental health and addiction care. In this case, treatment outcomes were improved. Adherence to weekly interferon dosing was nearly complete, and no patient interrupted treatment as a consequence of psychiatrical complications, drug use or relapse (25).

One important component of a comprehensive care program is education. In our experience, many of the patients who decline treatment do so as a consequence of misinformation related to HCV disease and/or treatment. A previous HCV knowledge questionnaire at our site (26) found that 52% of patients rated knowledge of HCV as poor at their first visit. These patients self-identified HCV education and psychological counselling as important needs. After nearly one year of interactions with our HCV clinic team, these patients indicated that they felt better informed, and were more satisfied with their care and more actively involved in their treatment (26). Another study conducted at The Ottawa Hospital (27) found that patient readiness for successfully starting antiretroviral medications for HIV can be enhanced by providing a psychoeducational readiness adherence intervention. HIV treatment, similar to HCV treatment, can be difficult, and a similar model of pretreatment intervention could be applied to patients with HCV.

HIV care is centralized in the Ottawa region, with the vast majority of HIV and HIV-HCV coinfected patients followed entirely or at least in part by the immunodeficiency clinic based at The Ottawa Hospital. As such, we believe that the approximately 350 HIV-HCV coinfected patients followed at the Immunodeficiency Clinic represent the large majority of patients in the region. We acknowledge that the proportion of treatment-eligible, coinfected patients in our region may have been overestimated as a consequence of referral bias, both from our own immunodeficiency clinic and the small number of HIV-HCV coinfected patients followed elsewhere. This may explain why, in our clinic, 33% of patients started therapy, which is higher than the rates reported at other sites (1821). Socioeconomic status impacts treatment uptake and outcomes. However, this information was not available for analysis. Of note, economic factors are not a major barrier to obtaining HCV medication in Canada, because economically disadvantaged patients are eligible for a drug benefit card that covers this specific expense.

Despite the concerns described above, our study demonstrated multiple but consistent barriers to HCV treatment in a Canadian HIV-HCV coinfected population. Our current approach to HCV care is fractured. Mounting evidence suggests that a multidisciplinary model of care could address the social and psychiatric issues frequently encountered in this population, reduce the loss of patients to follow-up, effectively educate and prepare patients, and treat a larger proportion of the HIV-HCV coinfected population.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sandra Cote-Belair for her clerical assistance.

REFERENCES

1. Boulos D, Yan P, Schanzer D, Remis RS, Archibald CP. Estimates of HIV prevalence and incidence in Canada, 2005 Canada Communicable Disease Report 2006. 32165–174.174<http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/06vol32/dr3215e.html> (Version current at December 12, 2007). [PubMed]
2. Rosenthal E, Pialoux G, Bernard N, et al. for the GERMIVIC Joint Study Group. Liver-related mortality in human-immunodeficiency-virus-infected patients between 1995 and 2003 in the French GERMIVIC Joint Study Group Network (MORTAVIC 2003 Study) J Viral Hepat. 2007;14:183–8. [PubMed]
3. Cooper CL, DeForest J, Gill J, LaLonde R, for the Canadian HIV Trials Network (CTN) Co-Infection Core Group. Barriers preventing liver transplantation in Canadians with HIV-infection –Perceptions of HIV specialists. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21:179–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Benhamou Y, Bochet M, Di Martino V, et al. Liver fibrosis progression in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus coinfected patients. The Multivirc Group. Hepatology. 1999;30:1054–8. [PubMed]
5. Lesens O, Deschênes M, Steben M, Bélanger G, Tsoukas CM. Hepatitis C virus is related to progressive liver disease in human immunodeficiency virus-positive hemophiliacs and should be treated as an opportunistic infection. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:1254–8. [PubMed]
6. Thomas DL. Hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Hepatology. 2002;36(Suppl 1):S201–9. [PubMed]
7. Graham CS, Baden LR, Yu E, et al. Influence of human immunodeficiency virus infection on the course of hepatitis C virus infection: A meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:562–9. [PubMed]
8. Monga HK, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Breaux K, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection-related morbidity and mortality among patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:240–7. [PubMed]
9. Torriani FJ, Rodriguez-Torres M, Rockstroh JK, et al. for the APRICOT Study Group. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribaviron for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:438–50. [PubMed]
10. Chung RT, Anderson J, Volberding P, et al. for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5071 Study Team. Peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribaviron for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected persons. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:451–9. [PubMed]
11. Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus and the role of hepatitis C or B virus infection. JAMA. 2000;283:74–80. [PubMed]
12. Restrepo A, Johnson TC, Widjaja D, et al. The rate of treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients co-infected with HIV in an urban medical centre. J Viral Hepat. 2005;12:86–90. [PubMed]
13. Fleming CA, Craven DE, Thornton D, Tumilty S, Nunes D. Hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in an urban population: Low eligibility for interferon treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:97–100. [PubMed]
14. Thompson VV, Regland KE, Hall CS, Morgan M, Bangsberg DR. Provider assessment of eligibility for hepatitis C treatment in HIV-infected homeless and marginally housed persons. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 3):S208–14. [PubMed]
15. Butt A, Justice A, Sanderson M, et al. Program and Abstracts of the 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Denver) Alexandria,VA: Foundation for Retrovirology and Human Health; 2006. Rate and predictors of treatment for Hepatitis C (Abstract 862) p. 365.
16. Scott J, Wald A, Kitahata M, et al. Program and Abstracts of the 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Denver) Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Retrovirology and Human Health; 2006. HCV is infrequently evaluated and treated in an urban HIV clinic population (Astract 882) p. 373.
17. Mehta SH, Lucas G, Torbenson M, et al. Program and Abstracts of the 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Denver) Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Retrovirology and Human Health; 2006. Barriers to referral for hepatisis C virus care among HIV/HCV-co-infected patient in an Urban HIV clinic (Abstract 884) p. 374.
18. Fleming CA, Craven DE, Thornton D, Tumilty S, Nunes D. Hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in an urban population: Low eligibility for interferon treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:97–100. [PubMed]
19. Restrepo A, Johnson TC, Widjaja D, et al. The rate of treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients co-infected with HIV in an urban medical centre. J Viral Hepat. 2005;12:86–90. [PubMed]
20. Nunes D, Saitz R, Libman H, Cheng DM, Vidaver J, Samet JH. Barriers to treatment of hepatitis C in HIV/HCV-coinfected adults with alcohol problems. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30:1520–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Shafran SD, Manshinter LD, Lindemulder A, et al. Eligibility of HIV-HCV coinfected adults for HCV treatment Can J Infect Dis 2004. 1546A(Abst)
22. Mitty JA, Stone VE, Sands M, Macalino G, Flanigan T. Directly observed therapy for the treatment of people with human immunodeficiency virus infection: A work in progress. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:984–90. [PubMed]
23. Clanon KA, Johannes Mueller J, Harank M. Integrating treatment for hepatitis C virus infection into an HIV Clinic. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(Suppl 5):S362–6. [PubMed]
24. Kresina TF, Bruce RD, Cargill VA, Cheever LW. Integrating care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and primary care for HIV for injection drug users coinfected with HIV and HCV. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 1):S83–8. [PubMed]
25. Taylor LE. Delivering care to injection drug users coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(Suppl 5):S355–61. [PubMed]
26. Balfour L, Cooper C, Tasca GA, Kane M, Kowal J, Garber G. Evaluation of health care needs and patient satisfaction among hepatitis C patients treated at a hospital-based, viral hepatitis clinic. Can J Public Health. 2004;95:272–7. [PubMed]
27. Balfour L, Kowal J, Silverman A, et al. A randomized controlled psycho-education intervention trial: Improving psychological readiness for successful HIV medication adherence and reducing depression before initiating HAART. AIDS Care. 2006;18:830–8. [PubMed]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of Pulsus Group
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...